Slowest Acceleration!! Take 2! (See description)

[HumanSlave843]

wow, I think the ford transit has it beat.

[FatGuyWithAKatana]

that's a real bat out of hell white knuckle get in sit down shut up and hold on kinda car ain't it?

[Bobagonoosh552]

@FatGuyWithAKatana yeah pretty much

[palebeachbum]

Haha, this is SO the 2.5L 4cyl. and 3-spd automatic. I owned a Chrysler and 2 Plymouths with this engine and transmission. I recognize the sound and LONG first gear. Very dependable, but so friggin' slow.

[McCooper21]

id be so fustrated by this junk and probaly killed cos its too slow

[Awadfakhoury]

the car sounds mean but it is slow as heck

[whitecabinet1]

running on EMPTY!

[Bobagonoosh552]

@whitecabinet1 Wrong. Full tank. Broken gas gauge. We know when to fill up by the mileage.

[streetboy281]

SOUNDS LIKE A FUCKINF 4 CYLINDER VOYAGER,PIECE OF SHIT ENGINES, NEONS, STRATUS AND ECLIPSES, POSHIT CARS..

[Bobagonoosh552]

@streetboy281 it is. but at least its built like a tank. I dont think it will ever die

[MultiParasite]

Well shorter gearing would certainly help.

[MsCrappants]

i have seen slower

[Pabcio]

Well, I'm glad that at least you started...

[Bobagonoosh552]

@Pabcio Its a milestone every time the keys are turned.

[Kenttas]

This is still far better looking and faster car than audi. Audi = POS.

[Capwonder]

@Kenttas You prolly had a bad experience Their older models suck ass i agree lol if thats what your referring to. I have a couple audis ones abused as shit but both run perfect with 170k on it no sign of stopping

[aura984]

yay!!!! the engine sounds cool :D

[geforcefly1982]

23 seconds to 60... no wonder why Chrysler dropped that anemic 100hp 4-cylinder.

[Bobagonoosh552]

@geforcefly1982 hahaha! yeah really. but old Chryslers are tanks! they are very reliable. have much less problems than new ones

[Cruxalicious]

@geforcefly1982 But the 75BHP Twingo engine does it in just under 13. It's just that a Voyager's one huge lump of steel and plastic.