I am much more worried about Al Cracker and the Teahadists than any group from outside the USA. We already have Christian Laws forced on this Secular Nation, I want things to get better, and we begin preserving our Liberty by strengthening the Wall of Separation between Church and State to protect *EVERYONE'S* Rights.
@ThorkilKowalski lol it just occurred to me that you were being sarcastic...my apologies...it's just so many obama supporters say that EXACT SAME LOAD OF SHIT.
ROFL. The fact that most socialist don't complain about Obama's wars just shows that they didn't really mind the wars, their actual problem was George Bush. The wars were just an apology to bash Bush ("Bush-bashing"). Even I didn't have that low thoughts about the left and they are not exactly my favorite people :/
Not completely true. Contrary to popular belief, the War on Terror ended in 2003, but it's never TECHNICALLY ended because we haven't removed the troops. Vietnam wasn't really getting stuck, it was Nixon being pressured into removing the troops. And World War 2 and World War 1... yeah, we didn't get stuck there.
ww1-2 were successes but since then its been downhill vietnam is widly considered a failure and the middle east my have sortof been a success but killing adam hussain made al-queda worse and there still at large despite bin ladens death so thats pretty much a failure aswell since that was the aim the war on terror isnt over
this is fucking bullshit. republicans are the ones who know who the enemy is. The only thing democrats care about is helping people sit on their asses and do nothing with welfare, spending, and raising taxes.
what about in the sino-russian war where the democrats attacked japan, when they thought they were on japans side? know your history as well. The leader at the time was democratic.
@zachmagana95 ok these may be good points lets now look at the present shall we its now the republican party trying to cut min wage (basically re instate slavery) its the republican party that's trying to cut social security make you work longer its the republican party that started and has maintained the war in the middle east for nearly 10 years so basically the republican party is going backwards or at least contradicting its original ideology
@zachmagana95 The Republican party that voted to free the slaves had LIBERAL beliefs like the Democrats today, until the party re-alignment...the Republicans today hold conservative views.
@zachmagana95 Are you joking? I THINK YOU NEED TO LEARN YOUR "FACTS". No clue how you concluded that Republicans voted for the civil rights act of 1964 but you are either misinformed or purposely lying. In fact it was signed into law by a democratic President and voted on by both Democrats and Republicans and although a majority of both parties voted for it, there were more democrats in both house and senate. The bill was also first called for by Kennedy in a speech he did in 63'.
it just comes to show how far republicans will go to start another war.. LAME!! lets just all spend another $300trillion of taxpayers money on war. Fuck the economy or who cares if we have the money to do it or not (sarcasm intended) Isn't this one of the reasons America is where it is at today? THINK PEOPLE !! USE THAT NOODLE
I'm sorry, but I must say, this series is really pissing me off. Seriously, if you're going to compare the parties, be fair, don't be so fucking one sided!
@IndianaJoker seriously when it comes down to foreign policy the Republicans are unelectable ...........greetings from the Uk ( and I am a Torie and not a lib/lab voter)
@KingEdward993 I will concede this. Besides, I'm not a Republican, more of a moderate leaning conservative, or Republicrat, if you will. Do you mean you vote for the Conservative Party? Because, I'm planning on moving over to London at some point, and I'm trying to learn more on British politics and culture. Also, did Cameron and Clegg ever decide to have a partnership in Parliment?
it is worth noting how much terrorism has diminished ever since western leftist media started sweeping it under the rug after obama's election. not as many terrorists and insurgents were willing to sacrifice their lives if the western press would not pick up the story. this was clear proof that many if not most of the casualties were the result of "anti-war" protesters and the leftist media, who were desperately trying to turn it into a defeat for bush.
the left knew it would be poitical suicide to come out and directly support terrorists. instead, they made excuses for terrorists by blamiing everything they hated, from bush, to israel, to the republican party, to christianity, to capitalism, to the US, to western civilization. in other words, everyone who made such comments in public, including public internet forums, was providing moral support, aid and comfort to the enemies of western liberal values.
@ellwyn no they didn't I am a member of the Conservative Party of the United Kingdom and must say that even in my political view the measures the Bush administration took were clearly inapropriate and not helpfull . Terrorism grows from poverty lacking education and of course exploitation.
This attributes are usually to be blamed on completly unrestrained capitalism and the Intolerance of the Republican governments towards other cultures.
Yeah problem is we don't have that info cause the democratshsve a real good plan let's slack airport securities and we can't look for people who are muslim cause that's not right let's tell osama and the others when were pulling out so all they have to do is wait till then
yea cause we should totaly just let the terroist come to us. no big deal right, i mean clinton didn't do anything about the first bombing of the twin towers, and Al-Qaeda only came back in 2001 to finish the job. Not a big deal right?
You democrats out there have no idea what the fuck your talking about
@Dwal86 Touching. Is it blatant concern for your country that allows you to justify invading countries and killing innocent people? I suppose you also think GITMO is perfectly alright? Sure, let's strip innocent people of their rights under the Geneva Conventions; as long as it makes us feel safer, then it's okay. Fear and propaganda are clouding your moral judgment. Iraq is not better off. Thousands dead, Iraqis and Americans, and all because of fear.
So what is in this "Democrat's" "Red-Book" that would stop it all "in it's tracks".....? Worldwide appology tour? Nukes? Free $ and healthcare for Al Queda? Hope... Change...? What pray tell have i missed? BTW, I love the way they put a communist weapon in the hands of a "Republican".. As if a Democrat would know the difference one firearm to the next..
hasn't the past year of maintaining the status quo shown ANYTHING to you people??? This ridiculous two-sided competition (Dems/Repubs) is like choosing between an Ass or a Dick!! The Dems in office r just as awful as bush was and its SO apperent they all work together for the lobbists interests only, not the people. period.
Dont pull that oh Democrats are always pitting the blame on Republicans shit and while Im at it honestly i think the Republiacans are a good party it's just the over flown condridictions in the party are what pull people away from it plus if you look at ideoligys technically Republicans are a party for going back to the Good old Days and Democrats are about Moving Forward. Civics 101 tells you that.Plus this pro life shit, the is America right? They have the freedom to choose to have an abortion
democrats are more concern about aborting babies and euthanizing the elderly than they are about terrorists. It's a democrat thing, you wouldn't understand
Just like how the vast VAST majority of Democrats voted against the 13th and 15th amendment and 97% of Democrats voted against the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Then, by 1970 through Present, you try to tell people that the Democrats are the "Civil Rights" champions and the Republicans are racist.
Did you know, that the KKK was founded by Democrats? Did you know that there is a Senator who is in the Senate TODAY that was in the KKK? (Robert Byrd)
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! That tired of SMEAR campaign eh? I have a question? Have you actually read the amendment in question?
If you have, why do you think it doesn't mention rape, nor discuss rape, nor present any legislation that would protect rape victims or prosecute rapists?
Yet you EXTREME left-wing liberals try to pass it off as a rape bill so you can call those who voted against it pro-rape?
In case you haven't read it (which I believe you haven't) here is the full text of said amendment:
To prohibit the use of funds for any Federal contract with Halliburton Company, KBR, Inc., any of their subsidiaries or affiliates, or any other contracting party if such contractor or a subcontractor at any tier under such contract requires that employees or independent contractors sign mandatory arbitration clauses regarding certain claims.
Let me carefully analyse this for you, in regards to this being an anti-rape bill. This bill limits mandatory arbitration. Mandatory arbitration does not protect employees of a company, only the company itself. Further more, it does not protect against criminal charges. Last I checked, rape was a criminal offense, not a civil offense.
So if mandatory arbitration does not protect rapists from the law, and this amendment is concerned with mandatory arbitration and not rape...
yea obama even said if im president we leave iraq, but he didnt and he is sending thousands more troops to afghanistan. just makes me wonder why democrats hate bush, he had less troops out there....
"Don't you think we should pay attention to who the enemy is and where he's hiding?" I don't know - ask Bill Clinton - see what he thinks? Job well done dems. Job well done. It's not a stare down! Pay attention all you want - what good would that do. Oh yeah...once again - ask Billy Bob. Paying attention get's you the info on where he is. Well thanks for keeping an eye on the enemy.
SmallMedia should do their research before making fools of themselves. What intel do they have that could help the US magically disrupt Al Qaeda without putting any boots on the ground?
Oh, and Chrisg, I probably don't totally agree with your political stance, but thank you very much for your service. I don't particularly support the war in Iraq, but I totally stand behind men and women like you. You're right about Dems and Repubs both being pro-war. The Dems just lie about it for the votes.
awful videos.. saying republicans are like bin ladin?? wow! thats really not even close to being true, and they make it look like we have the lay out of all terrorist groups homes! lol!!
democrats trying to trick people? whats else is new?
i don't know why we democrats even bother. we should just let republicans look more and more stupid every day and casue all the problems. they already know how to do it, and they want to erradicate everything that isn't white or christian.
very one sided and completely false. they represent the republican minority that believes in war and violence. its like saying all democrats want to kill babies, smoke weed, and hump trees.
Wouldn't it be fantastic if there actually were democrats like the one presented in this video? (Well, there were...but then Lieberman was shunned--dissenting voices must be silenced. "Where have I heard that before?")
As I recall, the dems have stood in opposition to almost every effective information gathering tool we've been using in the last few years.
That "Republican" does not represent any real Republican's viewpoint.
My question to the makers of this video is:
How many terrorist attacks have there been on the US since 9/11?
Another one I have is:
Is Iraq better off now, without Saddam and Al-Qaeda, or was it better off before with the dictator or with us just leaving when all of those terrorists were running around?
Is Iraq better off now, with Saddam. Water worked. No nuclear waste all over. 2,000,000 more moms, dads, kids alive and healthy. No cities uttterly destroyed. No Al-Qaeda -- Saddam would have killed them.
@WashLincTRoosReag I can't believe peoples ignorance.... OMFG... Please tell me, and yes I am making fun of you but Im also being completely and totally serious... WHERE, DO, YOU, GET, YOUR, INFORMATION, FROM, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, TELL, ME! No, I really want to know, and Im being 100% serious about this. WHERE?!
@WashLincTRoosReag Saddam was a monster i agree and counter terrorism actions must be taken but did you know Osama is not even charged for 9/11? there simply isn't any proof that associates the two. terrorism has more then quadrupled in the last 8 years. and who do we have to tank for?
To answer your question there have been several small terrorist attacks in the US since 9/11.
And Iraq now has an Extremist Islamic government as appose to a Secular which means ( none religious ) goverment as they had under saddam.
also Al-Queda is from Afghanistan which is thousands of miles away from Iraq so that is like mixing up the US and Brazil, but Al-Queda did come to fight in Iraq AFTER the invasion.
Saddam was enemies with Muslim extremists and used to kill them.
@colour749 name the small attacks. chances are they where something like heists or car bombs, those are not things you can stop. al-queda is not in any single country. they might be from afghanistan, doesnt mean they are solely in afghanistan. doesnt matter who saddam was enemies with, that doesnt make him a good guy.
The problem is both our parties are SHIT!!! One party is crazed by war and getin richer. Another party are socialist mofos who want to get more involved in people's lives. So peoples i dnt know which evil is better?
as a consevative u know this is not how real republicans and conservatives really are this is showing what a radical republican would think also known as a neocon u can just as easly show on the far left someone crazy asshole like rosie odonnel who would premote killing innocent babies and saving convicted criminals soo this is not that good of an example
Liberals (Socialists)/Democrats like these two absolute morons will have their little fun making vids like these, all the while feeling so smug and intellectual, thinking they have made such REASONED points. Sadly for them though, all they have "proven" is how little they are able to REASON. These guys are both idiots. They know NOTHING about
FACTUAL events or what a "Republican/conservative is. ....absolutely NOTHING.
and how was my last statement unnecessary, its true
lets flip it, ronald reagan was to the right of the political spectrum, that is like me saying ronald reagan isn't a republican, he is a fascist, yes fascism is on the far right, but that doesn't make reagan a fascist
if i were to say something like that, than anyone has the right (even if i didnt say that, b/c of freedom of speech) to call me a jackass :)
his policies do lean to the left, but socialism is very far left,
he isn't going to make a welfare state where the CEO's and the shit kickers make the same amount, he is a capitalist, and last time i checked, you can't be a capitalist and a socialist at the same time ... unless i missed something lol
We know exactly who these terrorists are, and what they look like. When we try to capture terrorists, the ACLU (a liberal organization)starts whining. learn to politik.
Oh and by the way, FDR was th BEST president this world had yet!FDR entered the war to end a war! WE entered the war last. The Japanese bombed pearl harbor, and killed over 100 men!
BTW with Obama's 700,000,000,000 $ f.b. He will raise taxes on everyone. There is no other way he would be able to afford it. Clinton promised the same thing.
McCain was the biggest Republican cheerleader of the Bailout.
So while Obama taxes the upper 1%, McCain cuts taxes across the board while promising the same level of spending - thus skyrocketing our deficit even higher.
Economics 101 - You can't spend what you don't have.
Republicans don't understand this, and would rather your children be saddled w/ debt.
Upper 1%,,, who do you think invests the most and controls businesses and development. McCain doesnt promise a 700,000,000,000$ spending. You just made that up whatever though. "You cant spend what you dont have" are you serious; that contradict everything Obamas planning. Economics 101 you dont raise taxes on ANYONE during bad economic times..
"are you serious; that contradict everything Obamas planning."
Not true. Obama plans on taxing the people who already have more than enough money.
He will lower taxes on the middle-lower classes, ensuring that the money actually is inserted into the economy, rather than being siphoned off into an offshore account somewhere.
McCain is cutting taxes across the board, while maintaining the same amount of spending.
"Keeping to the pattern of Bush-era Republicans, McCain would also go deeper into the red than Obama. Including interest, hed increase the national debt by $4.5 trillion over a decade."
Bush era republicans? You realize most of this turmoil that begun the economic crisis started a while back before GW Bush's term... but I wouldnt expect you to know anymore about the crisis and the bad economy than its portrayed on cnn or whatever you watch. It goes a lot deeper than you know. If you can honestly just continue to blame the Republicans alone for whats happening then youre clearly an idiot and a waste of my time.
Bush could have fixed it and fot the record this shit really got bad under bush sr's watch.clinton was able to calm the situation down but then bush jr fucked it up all over again
if you used common sense, you would realize that once clinton left, there was a surplus, but when bush got in office, the shit hit the fan when it came to borrowing and spending and more borrowing
republicans had control from 01-06 and in 06 when they were fucking up the people voted for dems, almost every issue was in a gridlock, and for 2 years nothing happened which is the worse thing you can do, both parties are to blame, but republicans did more to fuck things up
Actually, the Bush tax cuts have generated more of an income than the tax bracet under Clinton; it's the spending thats out of control, the taxs cuts are working. Alos, the Community Reinvestinment Act of 1995 made banks give loans to "risky" clients; (ones that are in forclosure now) I think we all know who was President in 1995.
democrats are at fault to, im not taking away the blame on them
but i just find it retarded, that republicans blame the entire economic collapse on democrats, when they only cause the housing thing with the bad loans, if that were the case, how come republicans didn't foresee this and stop it
and if bush wanted to do the spending he did, then he shouldn't have cut taxes, that was retarded on his part
What capabilities bo we have to "disrupt" the terrorists that don't involve fighting? These are typical democratic rhetoric, baseless claims, pure rhetoric with no factual base. Stupid.
Fight Smart. Not hard. Hell, using a few hundred dollars worth of bombs and bullets, Mossad was able to tear the Black September organization's leadership to shreds in the seventies. We, on the other hand, have been stupid enough to use a ham-fisted millitary approach against an intangable enemy. The whole "shock and awe" thing was great political theatre, but now we've had our nose broken just like the French did in Algeria and the way out won't be easy.
I serve better by being a productive citizen and taking care of the cancer patients in the hospital where i work, not by blowing up people you're prejudiced against,
the problem is YOU DON'T need to fight... people does not have to die. you does not have to kill. you have an ignorat "shit list" fuck, your opinion is just a brainwashed crap,
Yeah I was in the Army, and I went through the brain-washing as well. The military doesn't want free thinkers. The military wants pawns and tools. You shouldn't be capable of questioning the agenda of the people telling you to go die. That's part of your training. I bet you god soldier of the cycle.
By the way, Democrats Suck 666, you do realize you have the mark of the beast in your name right? How conservative are you, really, you devil worshiper?
Actually , unless your a guns blazing , arab hating, ignorant ,gun loving, republican jerk....you're allowed to THINK all you want in the Army. Oh trust me I know. Any thing else other than I just described is a no-go in our military.
Basically, if you weren't a bush loyalist or McCain lover, you are not going to like your 4 or 6 year contract in the military nor will you make many friends.
Wow, you realize there is nothing credible about what you say... i take you about as seriously as a peanutTry to say something intelligent. I get the same asinine comments from all stupid democrats.
I guess you just can't handle why the Democrats are doing well in the polls and the Republicans are crashing and burning. Republicans are like spoilt children.
I find this funny seeing how Obama went into Libya and Pakistan
jac619 2 months ago
Democrats are a liberal wing of a business party. R. Nader.
Hey Democrats we are also members of a socio-economic class as well as a race, religion, gender and sexual identity.
Talltrees84 2 months ago
Wtf is this saying? I think they got the video backwards...
scoopolard 3 months ago
I am much more worried about Al Cracker and the Teahadists than any group from outside the USA. We already have Christian Laws forced on this Secular Nation, I want things to get better, and we begin preserving our Liberty by strengthening the Wall of Separation between Church and State to protect *EVERYONE'S* Rights.
tazru333 4 months ago in playlist More videos from SmallMediaXL
LOL Socialists
ClutchFR4G 5 months ago
Thank God Obama has pulled out all the troops of Afghanistan and Iraq and hasn't started any new wars... -.-
And equating R with Taleban and Al Qaeda is just classy.
ThorkilKowalski 5 months ago
@ThorkilKowalski Libya=new war
We still have thousands of troops in both afghanistan and iraq. DERP.
scoopolard 3 months ago
@scoopolard
:o No way!!
ThorkilKowalski 3 months ago
@ThorkilKowalski lol it just occurred to me that you were being sarcastic...my apologies...it's just so many obama supporters say that EXACT SAME LOAD OF SHIT.
scoopolard 3 months ago
@scoopolard
ROFL. The fact that most socialist don't complain about Obama's wars just shows that they didn't really mind the wars, their actual problem was George Bush. The wars were just an apology to bash Bush ("Bush-bashing"). Even I didn't have that low thoughts about the left and they are not exactly my favorite people :/
ThorkilKowalski 3 months ago
Vote Stewart Alexander 2012
skepticswastika1121 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I support Ron Paul for President 2012!
★ Join the Revolution! ★
Restore America now!
The Champion of the Constitution
The Defender of Freedom
The Taxpayer's Best Friend
Spread the word!!
VeniVidiAmavi 6 months ago
wow this video is so bias and wrong :(
OverseerJames 6 months ago
"where have I heard that before?" haha :)
santanaramostarango 6 months ago
What a bunch of liberal crap.
zipsrule 6 months ago
I <3 you
kisa154 7 months ago
IT'S TIME TO KICK SOME ASS!
AwesomeCoosa 7 months ago
i dnt thnk us hav the best military
kittendealer 8 months ago
@kittendealer
But they do... and they also have the biggest military funding.
AETutorials42 6 months ago
@AETutorials42
there the richest and and on paper they are the best but when they actually go to war theyget stuck
kittendealer 6 months ago
@kittendealer
Not completely true. Contrary to popular belief, the War on Terror ended in 2003, but it's never TECHNICALLY ended because we haven't removed the troops. Vietnam wasn't really getting stuck, it was Nixon being pressured into removing the troops. And World War 2 and World War 1... yeah, we didn't get stuck there.
AETutorials42 6 months ago
@AETutorials42
ww1-2 were successes but since then its been downhill vietnam is widly considered a failure and the middle east my have sortof been a success but killing adam hussain made al-queda worse and there still at large despite bin ladens death so thats pretty much a failure aswell since that was the aim the war on terror isnt over
kittendealer 6 months ago
War on terror's been going on for ten years and I'm still scared!
RadarKat73080 10 months ago
9/11 was done by terrorist from al-qaida, becouse muslims are crazy and want to kill every western people
DaBoomz13 11 months ago
@DaBoomz13 youre a dumbass just looking for attention.
AztlanFrost 10 months ago
this is fucking bullshit. republicans are the ones who know who the enemy is. The only thing democrats care about is helping people sit on their asses and do nothing with welfare, spending, and raising taxes.
VibroFuzz 1 year ago
@VibroFuzz if republicans know who the enemy is, then why did they invade the wrong country you tea bagging piece of shit????
AztlanFrost 10 months ago
@AztlanFrost
what about in the sino-russian war where the democrats attacked japan, when they thought they were on japans side? know your history as well. The leader at the time was democratic.
VibroFuzz 10 months ago
@VibroFuzz old history...
AztlanFrost 10 months ago
@AztlanFrost
ehh.. know what your talking about. I worked for the government, and I know what it can spew. So don't believe everything you hear.
VibroFuzz 10 months ago
you understand...
it was the REPUBLICAN PARTY that voted to FREE the slaves.
it was the REPUBLICAN PARTY that voted to give women the right to vote
it was the REPUBLICAN PARTY that voted FOR the civil rights act of 1964
AND YOU DO REALIZE,
it was the DEMOCRATS who kept the U.S. in Vietnam, which was the LONGEST WAR in U.S history (15 years)
please....learn your facts :)
zachmagana95 1 year ago
@zachmagana95 ok these may be good points lets now look at the present shall we its now the republican party trying to cut min wage (basically re instate slavery) its the republican party that's trying to cut social security make you work longer its the republican party that started and has maintained the war in the middle east for nearly 10 years so basically the republican party is going backwards or at least contradicting its original ideology
cloudvszell 11 months ago
@zachmagana95 The Republican party that voted to free the slaves had LIBERAL beliefs like the Democrats today, until the party re-alignment...the Republicans today hold conservative views.
dracenyian 3 months ago
@zachmagana95 Are you joking? I THINK YOU NEED TO LEARN YOUR "FACTS". No clue how you concluded that Republicans voted for the civil rights act of 1964 but you are either misinformed or purposely lying. In fact it was signed into law by a democratic President and voted on by both Democrats and Republicans and although a majority of both parties voted for it, there were more democrats in both house and senate. The bill was also first called for by Kennedy in a speech he did in 63'.
davewinger 2 months ago
@davewinger Yes, but a Republican president is the one that freed the slaves in the first place... DERP Ever hear of Abraham Lincoln?
AnnoyingXboxer 1 week ago
The Democrats disagree with the war but then they keep voting to fund it?
AmericaDevil 1 year ago
it just comes to show how far republicans will go to start another war.. LAME!! lets just all spend another $300trillion of taxpayers money on war. Fuck the economy or who cares if we have the money to do it or not (sarcasm intended) Isn't this one of the reasons America is where it is at today? THINK PEOPLE !! USE THAT NOODLE
raulrodri602 1 year ago
Comment removed
PunkAttitude8V 1 year ago
It's funny cause this is how it is in real life stupid Republicans.
Gatorfan242 1 year ago 6
@Gatorfan242 This video could be switched around with a Black man continuously asking for money.
GetPunkk 1 year ago
@Gatorfan242 This video is completely biased and anyone who doesn't see that is just a retard...
AnnoyingXboxer 1 week ago
fuck you dems
FrancescoIce 1 year ago
@FrancescoIce Fuck you too.
Sadiquit0 1 year ago
You guys think this is one-sided?... Nah, probably not...
ailbubble 1 year ago
@ailbubble Lol of course it's one-sided. Doesn't make it wrong.
Sadiquit0 1 year ago
I'm sorry, but I must say, this series is really pissing me off. Seriously, if you're going to compare the parties, be fair, don't be so fucking one sided!
IndianaJoker 1 year ago
@IndianaJoker seriously when it comes down to foreign policy the Republicans are unelectable ...........greetings from the Uk ( and I am a Torie and not a lib/lab voter)
KingEdward993 1 year ago
@KingEdward993 I will concede this. Besides, I'm not a Republican, more of a moderate leaning conservative, or Republicrat, if you will. Do you mean you vote for the Conservative Party? Because, I'm planning on moving over to London at some point, and I'm trying to learn more on British politics and culture. Also, did Cameron and Clegg ever decide to have a partnership in Parliment?
IndianaJoker 1 year ago
it is worth noting how much terrorism has diminished ever since western leftist media started sweeping it under the rug after obama's election. not as many terrorists and insurgents were willing to sacrifice their lives if the western press would not pick up the story. this was clear proof that many if not most of the casualties were the result of "anti-war" protesters and the leftist media, who were desperately trying to turn it into a defeat for bush.
ellwyn 1 year ago
@ellwyn So, what, you want someone like Bush to get into office and then have the attacks start up again?
MaoiMeowi2 1 year ago
@ellwyn the Reps are unelectable with their foreign policy
KingEdward993 1 year ago
the left knew it would be poitical suicide to come out and directly support terrorists. instead, they made excuses for terrorists by blamiing everything they hated, from bush, to israel, to the republican party, to christianity, to capitalism, to the US, to western civilization. in other words, everyone who made such comments in public, including public internet forums, was providing moral support, aid and comfort to the enemies of western liberal values.
ellwyn 1 year ago
@ellwyn no they didn't I am a member of the Conservative Party of the United Kingdom and must say that even in my political view the measures the Bush administration took were clearly inapropriate and not helpfull . Terrorism grows from poverty lacking education and of course exploitation.
This attributes are usually to be blamed on completly unrestrained capitalism and the Intolerance of the Republican governments towards other cultures.
Greetings
Theodore Cromwell
KingEdward993 1 year ago
the only thing I have eo say is a mac sucks
Splangy1 1 year ago
Clearly as soon as we elect a Democrat we'll stop occupying these countries we've invaded for no reason. Oh wait...
Casanuda 1 year ago
This is more like Liberal vs. Libertarian.
Savaril 1 year ago
Ur a fucking douche just like a democrat you have succesfully created propoganda we don't have that info bitch
TheKentuckykid9513 1 year ago
Yeah problem is we don't have that info cause the democratshsve a real good plan let's slack airport securities and we can't look for people who are muslim cause that's not right let's tell osama and the others when were pulling out so all they have to do is wait till then
TheKentuckykid9513 1 year ago
Pussy Democrats hate to take action, don't they?
feeblepizza 1 year ago
yea cause we should totaly just let the terroist come to us. no big deal right, i mean clinton didn't do anything about the first bombing of the twin towers, and Al-Qaeda only came back in 2001 to finish the job. Not a big deal right?
You democrats out there have no idea what the fuck your talking about
Dwal86 1 year ago
@Dwal86 Touching. Is it blatant concern for your country that allows you to justify invading countries and killing innocent people? I suppose you also think GITMO is perfectly alright? Sure, let's strip innocent people of their rights under the Geneva Conventions; as long as it makes us feel safer, then it's okay. Fear and propaganda are clouding your moral judgment. Iraq is not better off. Thousands dead, Iraqis and Americans, and all because of fear.
monomezurashii 1 year ago
Liberals are pussys.
taythesnakewrangler 1 year ago
HAHA Democrats don't know how to handle the War on Terror.
PunkAttitude8V 1 year ago
So what is in this "Democrat's" "Red-Book" that would stop it all "in it's tracks".....? Worldwide appology tour? Nukes? Free $ and healthcare for Al Queda? Hope... Change...? What pray tell have i missed? BTW, I love the way they put a communist weapon in the hands of a "Republican".. As if a Democrat would know the difference one firearm to the next..
koibast 1 year ago
hasn't the past year of maintaining the status quo shown ANYTHING to you people??? This ridiculous two-sided competition (Dems/Repubs) is like choosing between an Ass or a Dick!! The Dems in office r just as awful as bush was and its SO apperent they all work together for the lobbists interests only, not the people. period.
CetraTJ 1 year ago
This is kind of offensive,
Offensive to the fact that they didn't research before they made this. :P
Karregaard 2 years ago 2
jeangrey your a genius.
thetriggerpuller 2 years ago
Dont pull that oh Democrats are always pitting the blame on Republicans shit and while Im at it honestly i think the Republiacans are a good party it's just the over flown condridictions in the party are what pull people away from it plus if you look at ideoligys technically Republicans are a party for going back to the Good old Days and Democrats are about Moving Forward. Civics 101 tells you that.Plus this pro life shit, the is America right? They have the freedom to choose to have an abortion
thetriggerpuller 2 years ago
Republicans are about "ME", Democrates are about "WE"
jeangrey65 2 years ago
republicans! hahhaa
MrAmerica406 2 years ago
democrats are more concern about aborting babies and euthanizing the elderly than they are about terrorists. It's a democrat thing, you wouldn't understand
jlane4512 2 years ago
Funny. If you look at all of the official wars fought in the past 100 years, you'll noticed something.
World War 1 - Democrat Administration
World War 2 - Democrat Administration
Korean War - Democrat Administration
Vietnam - Democrat Administration
Persian Gulf War - Republican Administration.
Sooooo .... Republicans are the war starters huh?
I just love the way you Democrats try to blame all your habits on Republicans.
mcdonalsuny 2 years ago 2
Just like how the vast VAST majority of Democrats voted against the 13th and 15th amendment and 97% of Democrats voted against the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Then, by 1970 through Present, you try to tell people that the Democrats are the "Civil Rights" champions and the Republicans are racist.
Did you know, that the KKK was founded by Democrats? Did you know that there is a Senator who is in the Senate TODAY that was in the KKK? (Robert Byrd)
mcdonalsuny 2 years ago
Check out the video "Papantonio: Republicans for Rape" This explains what they are for.
jeangrey65 2 years ago
@jeangrey65
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! That tired of SMEAR campaign eh? I have a question? Have you actually read the amendment in question?
If you have, why do you think it doesn't mention rape, nor discuss rape, nor present any legislation that would protect rape victims or prosecute rapists?
Yet you EXTREME left-wing liberals try to pass it off as a rape bill so you can call those who voted against it pro-rape?
mcdonalsuny 2 years ago
In case you haven't read it (which I believe you haven't) here is the full text of said amendment:
To prohibit the use of funds for any Federal contract with Halliburton Company, KBR, Inc., any of their subsidiaries or affiliates, or any other contracting party if such contractor or a subcontractor at any tier under such contract requires that employees or independent contractors sign mandatory arbitration clauses regarding certain claims.
Show me where it mentions rape?
mcdonalsuny 2 years ago
Let me carefully analyse this for you, in regards to this being an anti-rape bill. This bill limits mandatory arbitration. Mandatory arbitration does not protect employees of a company, only the company itself. Further more, it does not protect against criminal charges. Last I checked, rape was a criminal offense, not a civil offense.
So if mandatory arbitration does not protect rapists from the law, and this amendment is concerned with mandatory arbitration and not rape...
mcdonalsuny 2 years ago
lol this is a bad video, but the republicans would have done the same thing.
grnbbllntrck 2 years ago
@mcdonalsuny
yea obama even said if im president we leave iraq, but he didnt and he is sending thousands more troops to afghanistan. just makes me wonder why democrats hate bush, he had less troops out there....
cancanbiker 2 years ago
cheap ''Crat propaganda
ntn1987 2 years ago
"Don't you think we should pay attention to who the enemy is and where he's hiding?" I don't know - ask Bill Clinton - see what he thinks? Job well done dems. Job well done. It's not a stare down! Pay attention all you want - what good would that do. Oh yeah...once again - ask Billy Bob. Paying attention get's you the info on where he is. Well thanks for keeping an eye on the enemy.
g4shorty9niner 2 years ago
Republicans : Fight wars there
Democrats : Fight wars here
RadiouAddict 2 years ago
Libertarians: Don't fight wars at all because it's harmful to go messing around with other countries.
unityrover 2 years ago
hahah republicans are so ignorant
dowshipwigga 2 years ago
Oh, you.
unityrover 2 years ago
SmallMedia should do their research before making fools of themselves. What intel do they have that could help the US magically disrupt Al Qaeda without putting any boots on the ground?
Oh, and Chrisg, I probably don't totally agree with your political stance, but thank you very much for your service. I don't particularly support the war in Iraq, but I totally stand behind men and women like you. You're right about Dems and Repubs both being pro-war. The Dems just lie about it for the votes.
coma8coma1 2 years ago
i love the way that only republicans watch these videos lol!
moan moan moan....
benbrocklehurst 2 years ago
YAY! Let's let terrorists live!
And spend other people's money on it!
CaledoniaProductions 2 years ago
awful videos.. saying republicans are like bin ladin?? wow! thats really not even close to being true, and they make it look like we have the lay out of all terrorist groups homes! lol!!
democrats trying to trick people? whats else is new?
cboy1589 2 years ago
voting democrat and republican end up roughly the same (both in a bad place)
to really vote different vote 3rd party or ron paul
amalwaysawsome 2 years ago
i don't know why we democrats even bother. we should just let republicans look more and more stupid every day and casue all the problems. they already know how to do it, and they want to erradicate everything that isn't white or christian.
happyzapata 2 years ago
One sided arguments, you make me lol.
Pellett29 2 years ago
very one sided and completely false. they represent the republican minority that believes in war and violence. its like saying all democrats want to kill babies, smoke weed, and hump trees.
coverchenko 2 years ago
These videos are completely one sided and suck ass.
KingGinger1 2 years ago
Yeah because those damn Republicans got us into Vietnam, Korea, Bosnia,Somalia..... o wait no that was Democrats.
Da55Moose 2 years ago 2
So pathetic.
ArboriusOwns 2 years ago 3
these videos are incredibly lame.
Russoft 2 years ago 5
Wouldn't it be fantastic if there actually were democrats like the one presented in this video? (Well, there were...but then Lieberman was shunned--dissenting voices must be silenced. "Where have I heard that before?")
As I recall, the dems have stood in opposition to almost every effective information gathering tool we've been using in the last few years.
MissingChurchill 2 years ago 5
stupid ass... assuming any liberal is smart enough to get that
MaryBeth321123 2 years ago 4
Oh American Politics. I will never understand your government.
BrittandSlav 3 years ago
and what british politics are any better, god save the queen!!!!!!
LiberalTranslation 2 years ago
Yea this is totally de-grading to democrats and makes them look like liberal pussys also if you want ure kids looking at porn vote pro democrat.
peepoo1 3 years ago 3
That "Republican" does not represent any real Republican's viewpoint.
My question to the makers of this video is:
How many terrorist attacks have there been on the US since 9/11?
Another one I have is:
Is Iraq better off now, without Saddam and Al-Qaeda, or was it better off before with the dictator or with us just leaving when all of those terrorists were running around?
WashLincTRoosReag 3 years ago 5
Is Iraq better off now, with Saddam. Water worked. No nuclear waste all over. 2,000,000 more moms, dads, kids alive and healthy. No cities uttterly destroyed. No Al-Qaeda -- Saddam would have killed them.
9-11 was a BLESSING. -- D. Rumsfeld
also said by his colleagues who agreed
including some said it before 9-11
we need another attack -- D. Rumsfeld
and his colleagues who Bush hired to protect us
do the math
dilbertgeg 2 years ago
@WashLincTRoosReag I can't believe peoples ignorance.... OMFG... Please tell me, and yes I am making fun of you but Im also being completely and totally serious... WHERE, DO, YOU, GET, YOUR, INFORMATION, FROM, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, TELL, ME! No, I really want to know, and Im being 100% serious about this. WHERE?!
TovarishGruzin 1 year ago
@WashLincTRoosReag Saddam was a monster i agree and counter terrorism actions must be taken but did you know Osama is not even charged for 9/11? there simply isn't any proof that associates the two. terrorism has more then quadrupled in the last 8 years. and who do we have to tank for?
eidius1989 1 year ago
@WashLincTRoosReag
To answer your question there have been several small terrorist attacks in the US since 9/11.
And Iraq now has an Extremist Islamic government as appose to a Secular which means ( none religious ) goverment as they had under saddam.
also Al-Queda is from Afghanistan which is thousands of miles away from Iraq so that is like mixing up the US and Brazil, but Al-Queda did come to fight in Iraq AFTER the invasion.
Saddam was enemies with Muslim extremists and used to kill them.
colour749 1 year ago 18
@colour749
yup.
AceofDlamonds 9 months ago
@colour749 why does they have to be so many stupid people today.
gigaboy47 5 months ago
We also paid Saddam to fight Muslim extremists and used to support Al-Qaeda.
AnnoyingXboxer 1 week ago
@colour749 name the small attacks. chances are they where something like heists or car bombs, those are not things you can stop. al-queda is not in any single country. they might be from afghanistan, doesnt mean they are solely in afghanistan. doesnt matter who saddam was enemies with, that doesnt make him a good guy.
RESTxINxPIECEZ 23 hours ago
Dude, it's just a joke. don't take it personally.
phantom4087 1 year ago
The problem is both our parties are SHIT!!! One party is crazed by war and getin richer. Another party are socialist mofos who want to get more involved in people's lives. So peoples i dnt know which evil is better?
zezinho733 3 years ago 2
Where did you get this "information" from?
SaphireCatElf 3 years ago 4
So cliche...get a life liberal douche bags. Stop trying to be politically correct.
BryanNC08 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Alright, go fuck yourself to death. Incorrect enough for you?
mrbadguysan 3 years ago
Wow typical whinny immature liberal. "You don't agree with me so you should die! But I'm tolerant of everyone!"
BryanNC08 3 years ago 5
as a consevative u know this is not how real republicans and conservatives really are this is showing what a radical republican would think also known as a neocon u can just as easly show on the far left someone crazy asshole like rosie odonnel who would premote killing innocent babies and saving convicted criminals soo this is not that good of an example
rangershockey97 3 years ago
Liberals (Socialists)/Democrats like these two absolute morons will have their little fun making vids like these, all the while feeling so smug and intellectual, thinking they have made such REASONED points. Sadly for them though, all they have "proven" is how little they are able to REASON. These guys are both idiots. They know NOTHING about
FACTUAL events or what a "Republican/conservative is. ....absolutely NOTHING.
Stratslayer 3 years ago
As much as I agree with that, this video...kinda sucks...
BlueAllegory 3 years ago 2
Hahaha THAT's the AVERAGE REPUBLICAN for YOU!! They are mostly ignorant dumbasses
IAmSonyFanBoy 3 years ago
the idiocy in these video's is astounding
atemikage 3 years ago
lol, you have yet to proven yourself to being not a jackass, so i stand by my statement
andretheking86 3 years ago
(continued)
and how was my last statement unnecessary, its true
lets flip it, ronald reagan was to the right of the political spectrum, that is like me saying ronald reagan isn't a republican, he is a fascist, yes fascism is on the far right, but that doesn't make reagan a fascist
if i were to say something like that, than anyone has the right (even if i didnt say that, b/c of freedom of speech) to call me a jackass :)
andretheking86 3 years ago
totally? better, but not true
his policies do lean to the left, but socialism is very far left,
he isn't going to make a welfare state where the CEO's and the shit kickers make the same amount, he is a capitalist, and last time i checked, you can't be a capitalist and a socialist at the same time ... unless i missed something lol
(continued)
andretheking86 3 years ago
rpg2master: "Actually he's (talking about obama) a Socialist."
actually no you are wrong, he is a democrat
Brian Moore was the socialist party nominee ... jackass
andretheking86 3 years ago
and yet the democrats support killing babies.
VoiceOfModeration 3 years ago
Democrats support killing babies and republicans support killing babies with 500IB bombs. No one is innocent on that one budddddy!
Chrisg586 2 years ago
Well, granted, teachers won't accept it, b/c its not completely unbaised.
Airportchris2 3 years ago
B/c anyone can go in and edit them.
Airportchris2 3 years ago
Well, b/c of Bush.
Airportchris2 3 years ago
lol, you can't trust Wikipedia, my teachers won't accept essays, or papers, that have Wikipedia as a source.
Airportchris2 3 years ago
and exactly how do you come to that conclusion?
Airportchris2 3 years ago
Yeah, and the dems have had control of congress since '06!!
they could end the war if they REALLY wanted to, but the truth is, they're part of the same washington establishment as the republicans
VIVA RON PAUL-- he's our only hope now
omegaeli7e 3 years ago
We know exactly who these terrorists are, and what they look like. When we try to capture terrorists, the ACLU (a liberal organization)starts whining. learn to politik.
Tridd666 3 years ago 2
Who completly FUCKED this country?
George W FUCKHEAD!A REPUBLICAN!
Oh and by the way, FDR was th BEST president this world had yet!FDR entered the war to end a war! WE entered the war last. The Japanese bombed pearl harbor, and killed over 100 men!
America couldn't sit on that!
Spinosaur101 3 years ago
so republicans are terrorists....hmmm...wow, that'll divide a country
livephil121 3 years ago
yeah. democrats are really into bringing the country together. look at the wondrous good pelosi and reed have done since taking over.
shuhouse25 3 years ago
Apparently not, Obama won, and guess what, he is a democrat.
Airportchris2 3 years ago
This is so distorted and stupid that I could support an R.P. McMurphy Lobotomy on whoever wrote this dumbass skit. Calling Nurse Ratched!
JSK1121 3 years ago
BTW with Obama's 700,000,000,000 $ f.b. He will raise taxes on everyone. There is no other way he would be able to afford it. Clinton promised the same thing.
Democratssuck666 3 years ago
Obamas?
McCain was the biggest Republican cheerleader of the Bailout.
So while Obama taxes the upper 1%, McCain cuts taxes across the board while promising the same level of spending - thus skyrocketing our deficit even higher.
Economics 101 - You can't spend what you don't have.
Republicans don't understand this, and would rather your children be saddled w/ debt.
F33bs 3 years ago
Upper 1%,,, who do you think invests the most and controls businesses and development. McCain doesnt promise a 700,000,000,000$ spending. You just made that up whatever though. "You cant spend what you dont have" are you serious; that contradict everything Obamas planning. Economics 101 you dont raise taxes on ANYONE during bad economic times..
Democratssuck666 3 years ago
"Upper 1%,,, who do you think invests the most and controls businesses and development."
Know what that's called? Serfdom. If you enjoy being basically enslaved by rich bankers while you work your ass off, maybe you should move to China.
"McCain doesnt promise a 700,000,000,000$ spending."
McCain voted for the Bailout bill, which was actually $850 billion.
"You just made that up whatever though."
Maybe you should watch the news or read a paper.
F33bs 3 years ago
"are you serious; that contradict everything Obamas planning."
Not true. Obama plans on taxing the people who already have more than enough money.
He will lower taxes on the middle-lower classes, ensuring that the money actually is inserted into the economy, rather than being siphoned off into an offshore account somewhere.
McCain is cutting taxes across the board, while maintaining the same amount of spending.
F33bs 3 years ago
With Obama's plan, we are able to pay off some of the interest from borrowing from the Fed.
McCain is making sure we have NO money at all. Meaning programs people rely on will lose funding.
McCains basically amounts to a bribe, and not only that but is actually closer to socialism than Obama.
In order to offset the staggering amounts he's giving back to the upper 1%, the MIDDLE class will pay more taxes.
That is essentially redistribution of wealth.
F33bs 3 years ago
"Keeping to the pattern of Bush-era Republicans, McCain would also go deeper into the red than Obama. Including interest, hed increase the national debt by $4.5 trillion over a decade."
-Tax Vox Blog
The Tax Policy Center
F33bs 3 years ago
Bush era republicans? You realize most of this turmoil that begun the economic crisis started a while back before GW Bush's term... but I wouldnt expect you to know anymore about the crisis and the bad economy than its portrayed on cnn or whatever you watch. It goes a lot deeper than you know. If you can honestly just continue to blame the Republicans alone for whats happening then youre clearly an idiot and a waste of my time.
Democratssuck666 3 years ago 3
Bush could have fixed it and fot the record this shit really got bad under bush sr's watch.clinton was able to calm the situation down but then bush jr fucked it up all over again
wyrwulf69 3 years ago
Excuse me but I didn't say that. That was the Tax Policy Center.
Methinks they know a little more than some random sap on the internet with a ridiculously childish username.
F33bs 3 years ago
if you used common sense, you would realize that once clinton left, there was a surplus, but when bush got in office, the shit hit the fan when it came to borrowing and spending and more borrowing
republicans had control from 01-06 and in 06 when they were fucking up the people voted for dems, almost every issue was in a gridlock, and for 2 years nothing happened which is the worse thing you can do, both parties are to blame, but republicans did more to fuck things up
andretheking86 3 years ago
Actually, the Bush tax cuts have generated more of an income than the tax bracet under Clinton; it's the spending thats out of control, the taxs cuts are working. Alos, the Community Reinvestinment Act of 1995 made banks give loans to "risky" clients; (ones that are in forclosure now) I think we all know who was President in 1995.
pimpJIMMY69 3 years ago
democrats are at fault to, im not taking away the blame on them
but i just find it retarded, that republicans blame the entire economic collapse on democrats, when they only cause the housing thing with the bad loans, if that were the case, how come republicans didn't foresee this and stop it
and if bush wanted to do the spending he did, then he shouldn't have cut taxes, that was retarded on his part
andretheking86 3 years ago
aren't we doing both of those put together
MarkWayneCadman 3 years ago
al-qaeda doesn't exist.
caserock 3 years ago
What capabilities bo we have to "disrupt" the terrorists that don't involve fighting? These are typical democratic rhetoric, baseless claims, pure rhetoric with no factual base. Stupid.
nonamelef 3 years ago
Fight Smart. Not hard. Hell, using a few hundred dollars worth of bombs and bullets, Mossad was able to tear the Black September organization's leadership to shreds in the seventies. We, on the other hand, have been stupid enough to use a ham-fisted millitary approach against an intangable enemy. The whole "shock and awe" thing was great political theatre, but now we've had our nose broken just like the French did in Algeria and the way out won't be easy.
deadpool03mm 3 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
^
do u HATE today's political climate? check out. MR-SHY. COM !!
:)
mrshy 3 years ago
huh thats odd consitering the entire military supports the republicans........ Another double standard sad... :(
Democratssuck666 3 years ago
bullshit when I was in everyone hated going to IRaq
mbuller11 3 years ago
well, im not talking about the pussy squad.
FYI when you join the military don't bitch when you actually gave to serve.....
Democratssuck666 3 years ago
I serve better by being a productive citizen and taking care of the cancer patients in the hospital where i work, not by blowing up people you're prejudiced against,
mbuller11 3 years ago 3
mabye you do.......
Democratssuck666 3 years ago
I know I do, and so does everyone else, even you could serve better by doing that
mbuller11 3 years ago
are you saying we don't need soldiers? Some people are better at fighting than others
Democratssuck666 3 years ago
we special forces but not 100's of 1000's of kids out there
mbuller11 3 years ago
the problem is YOU DON'T need to fight... people does not have to die. you does not have to kill. you have an ignorat "shit list" fuck, your opinion is just a brainwashed crap,
deraickripper 3 years ago
Has your ass ever deployed before you little cunt?
Chrisg586 2 years ago
Yeah I was in the Army, and I went through the brain-washing as well. The military doesn't want free thinkers. The military wants pawns and tools. You shouldn't be capable of questioning the agenda of the people telling you to go die. That's part of your training. I bet you god soldier of the cycle.
By the way, Democrats Suck 666, you do realize you have the mark of the beast in your name right? How conservative are you, really, you devil worshiper?
evhwolfgang2003 3 years ago 4
There is a reason soldiers are lower ranks than their co's. They arent as quick. :(
Thy talking to a officer and someone who went to the military academy. Those people arent the tools you'll find in the regulars. They have brains
666 ohhh its a number... ITs that what your tantrum has come too? Sad. Dont think too hard youll hurt yourself.
Democratssuck666 3 years ago
Actually , unless your a guns blazing , arab hating, ignorant ,gun loving, republican jerk....you're allowed to THINK all you want in the Army. Oh trust me I know. Any thing else other than I just described is a no-go in our military.
Basically, if you weren't a bush loyalist or McCain lover, you are not going to like your 4 or 6 year contract in the military nor will you make many friends.
Chrisg586 2 years ago
Ha. You're funny. I guess the fact that Obama receives 6 times more donations from military families than McCain does means nothing to you?
bren9323 3 years ago
Where did you pull that one out of your ass? Cite a "Credible" Page ......
Democratssuck666 3 years ago
Sigh another nasty republican with his head full of shit.
reblives 3 years ago
Wow, you realize there is nothing credible about what you say... i take you about as seriously as a peanutTry to say something intelligent. I get the same asinine comments from all stupid democrats.
Democratssuck666 3 years ago
I guess you just can't handle why the Democrats are doing well in the polls and the Republicans are crashing and burning. Republicans are like spoilt children.
reblives 3 years ago