meaningfully and quizzically looks up at the person. This is the parent or therapist CUE (an often vitally missed opportunity) to deepen engagement. For example: "Oh no! What happened? Where is it? Is it over there? No. Up there?" This deepens the Focus from "task of child finding object and realizing what happened" to the social interaction of deepening the "task of engagement" which supports the deeper Aspects of the child's emotional-cognitive communicative language growth and development.
Now, with respect to "object permanence", "If a one-year old cannot find an object right away, they are likely to give up looking." Yes, this is true. But this is why Piaget thinking is limited as the focus is on a world of objects rather than the affect reciprocity of co-narrative social engagement. In other words, there is no object that baby acts on independently. Baby acts on objects only in relationship to social meaning with others. When the little boy can't find object he beautifully...
begins to naturally incorporate into his/her rich affect emerging dyadic repertoire with mom a new (playful back and forth) affect-sensory-motor dynamic: A new way or subtle added nuance of interacting (or rather co-interacting with caregiver). The "not sure of what happens when it leaves their sight." does not play a role of significance, as affective (emotional qualitative) reciprocal gesturing is quickly (and more or less seamlessly) integrated into a new way of back-and-forth rich exchanges
As a developmental special educator/therapist who works in Early Intervention with families of children with typical or neurodiversified challenges it is NOT that babies "..Are not quite sure what happens when objects leave their sight." This is a somewhat removed interpretation There is a more deeply empathically attuned interpretation. Awareness of what happened to mom (who is not an object ) is not the bemusement (from baby). It would better expressed by saying the baby.....
@bbsonjohn Hahah if you're in stage one you stop looking because you can't understand that the object exists without you necessarily seeing it. No object permeance in other words.
as difficult as this seems, i finally managed to masturbate to this video.
lordcalvert1 4 months ago
@lordcalvert1
...are you stupid?
carzybutsweet 2 months ago
hahaha little children, Y U so stupid?
pesiuber 4 months ago
Thumbs up if Pediatric Nursing brought you here!
TJPITT91 5 months ago
well not psychology....but human growth & development brought me here
nickyhoj11 6 months ago 2
@nickyhoj11 Me too!! Where are you going to school?
californiaking100 6 months ago
I think they know something we dont and as they grow up they forget.
mOIsEsEdUaRd0 6 months ago
Awwww aint they cute, the little retards :D
VII89 7 months ago 7
@VII89 im going to hell for laughing at ur comment xD
mOIsEsEdUaRd0 6 months ago 3
@mOIsEsEdUaRd0 I think we all are. xD but it was worth it.
JohnnyB2x4 6 months ago
@VII89 so we all were like 'little retards''
darcywretzky 5 months ago
meaningfully and quizzically looks up at the person. This is the parent or therapist CUE (an often vitally missed opportunity) to deepen engagement. For example: "Oh no! What happened? Where is it? Is it over there? No. Up there?" This deepens the Focus from "task of child finding object and realizing what happened" to the social interaction of deepening the "task of engagement" which supports the deeper Aspects of the child's emotional-cognitive communicative language growth and development.
Neilgs 1 year ago
Now, with respect to "object permanence", "If a one-year old cannot find an object right away, they are likely to give up looking." Yes, this is true. But this is why Piaget thinking is limited as the focus is on a world of objects rather than the affect reciprocity of co-narrative social engagement. In other words, there is no object that baby acts on independently. Baby acts on objects only in relationship to social meaning with others. When the little boy can't find object he beautifully...
Neilgs 1 year ago
begins to naturally incorporate into his/her rich affect emerging dyadic repertoire with mom a new (playful back and forth) affect-sensory-motor dynamic: A new way or subtle added nuance of interacting (or rather co-interacting with caregiver). The "not sure of what happens when it leaves their sight." does not play a role of significance, as affective (emotional qualitative) reciprocal gesturing is quickly (and more or less seamlessly) integrated into a new way of back-and-forth rich exchanges
Neilgs 1 year ago
As a developmental special educator/therapist who works in Early Intervention with families of children with typical or neurodiversified challenges it is NOT that babies "..Are not quite sure what happens when objects leave their sight." This is a somewhat removed interpretation There is a more deeply empathically attuned interpretation. Awareness of what happened to mom (who is not an object ) is not the bemusement (from baby). It would better expressed by saying the baby.....
Neilgs 1 year ago
thumbs up if childcare brought you here
TheBadRobot112 1 year ago
this is the most critical part of age!!!
switregz7 1 year ago
Dumb bastards.
RunningWithin 1 year ago
thanks helps understand the concept easily:)
jyojyoti 1 year ago
Thumbs up if psychology brought you here.
suavion 1 year ago 166
@suavion Let me guess, Psychology in college? Thumbs up for you man :D
Midnight1711 1 year ago 3
@Midnight1711 LOL yea man my psychology class Life Span Growth and Development. I passed it with an A!
suavion 1 year ago
No Thumbs up for you for asking for a Thumbs up.
LAMF1968 8 months ago
@suavion 9Gag bring me here
DunkelStern 6 months ago
interesting! are there more of these videos??
GoldenBrandon131997 1 year ago
what is the point of psychology?
sillydillydokieo 1 year ago
@sillydillydokieo So ppl won't be dumb as you.
astamatikos 1 year ago
helpful!
SheryeS 1 year ago
wow.... so thats the real resoning behind the peekaboo game
cwashi51 1 year ago
0:13 baby is toooooo cuteeee
kakaphenom 2 years ago
Thanks for the videos
fatimalazim 2 years ago
Can't find an object right away, they tend on give up looking?
I am still in stage 1 :(
bbsonjohn 2 years ago 114
Me too!! :D:D
XblindelveX 2 years ago
hahahaha...... thumb's up...
same lol
spegg89 1 year ago
@bbsonjohn Awww! That was honest of ya...
Redrum267 1 year ago
@bbsonjohn lollll!! I think alot of us are!
0NI0NCAT 1 year ago
@bbsonjohn Hahah if you're in stage one you stop looking because you can't understand that the object exists without you necessarily seeing it. No object permeance in other words.
ReyyanK 4 months ago
y en español no está?
sahid31390 2 years ago
muy bueno!
Ish90100 2 years ago
lol its a cool theory
RaquelRoxMySox 2 years ago
great video, wooo psychology!!!
richardwhaley53 3 years ago 8