Come on. Can you really deny evolution? Really? Start listening to the evidence. Open your eyes. An old earth actually disproves global warming as it means that positive feedback do not dominate the climate system.
There are an abundance of other proxy data which is perfectly consistent eith the ice core data, so how can the be that if the ice core data is wrong?
If I, as a complete amateur in this area (although with e university engineer exam) can debunk this guy he has to be a crackpot. The age of the ice core layers are verified in other ways too.
(There may be other different problems in the measurement of ice core proxies, e g CO2 moving inside the ice.)
There is no other data that corresponds with ice core dating. There was no ice on greenland 1000 years ago because thats when it was called greenland, hence it was green. Norse farming lodges are found on greenland when the ice melts, they were not built 800,000 years ago.
You misunderstood me. I agree that Greenland and the world was warmer in the medieval period, and I''m a skeptic too.
I say that this observation and the theory based on it is stupid, It's not debunk anything because it's a stupid conspiracy against a natural phenomenon.
If don't think the critics against the AGW religion benifits from stupid theories like this among skeptics. I'm not going to silent him either, because I believe there ppl have enough education to reject this.
I can add that there are other methods with which one dates ice. If he's right then the ice ages and interglaciers would be 10000 and 1000 years, not 10 times longer. Ice core data are consistent with other proxy data in respect to ice ages and the interglaciers! Of course weather partterns idoesn't cause the same lines in the ice as summer and winter.
This hypothesis is crap. I'm a climate skeptic, and not an idiot.
.This is common sense any one can go out on one of Minnesotas frozen lakes in mid March, find a spot without tracks made by man or beast ad find several layers created in a single winter season. It is dishonest to believe each layer represents a single year.
Follow the money, and then decide if man made global warming is science or politics. Over 31,000 scientists have signed a petition disputing man made global warming. Politician Al Gore has declared the issue as decided science while he collects millions in his carbon credit schemes. The Political class and Academia have money and power to gain in perpetuating the man made global warming myth. They have money, power, and face to loose if Global Warming is determined to be a hoax.
I did not site any scientists. It is my own experience as an ice fisherman. I have experienced hitting several layers of different ice cutting a single hole. I do not need a PHD to figure out that each layer of ice does not represent twelve months.
Those planes were on an active glacier LOL
DutchNordic 1 year ago
3:50 - hallelujah
KarlRuprectKroenen 1 year ago
Kent Hovind is a moron. Even though global warming is nonsense you shouldn't listen to him.
Scoforever 2 years ago
@Scoforever Global Warming is the second biggest scientific hoax of all time, Evolution dwarfs it.
M4GW 2 years ago 2
Come on. Can you really deny evolution? Really? Start listening to the evidence. Open your eyes. An old earth actually disproves global warming as it means that positive feedback do not dominate the climate system.
Scoforever 2 years ago
is this a joke?
cthulhu11111111 2 years ago
That sounds like a preacher-man.
Dont you know that pressure under a plane creates heat, that makes tha plane melt its way down?
wikeroy 2 years ago
There are an abundance of other proxy data which is perfectly consistent eith the ice core data, so how can the be that if the ice core data is wrong?
If I, as a complete amateur in this area (although with e university engineer exam) can debunk this guy he has to be a crackpot. The age of the ice core layers are verified in other ways too.
(There may be other different problems in the measurement of ice core proxies, e g CO2 moving inside the ice.)
magnusea 2 years ago
This is actually so typical conspiracy junk so I'm embarressed for my comment.
magnusea 2 years ago
There is no other data that corresponds with ice core dating. There was no ice on greenland 1000 years ago because thats when it was called greenland, hence it was green. Norse farming lodges are found on greenland when the ice melts, they were not built 800,000 years ago.
warriorprince1010 2 years ago
You misunderstood me. I agree that Greenland and the world was warmer in the medieval period, and I''m a skeptic too.
I say that this observation and the theory based on it is stupid, It's not debunk anything because it's a stupid conspiracy against a natural phenomenon.
If don't think the critics against the AGW religion benifits from stupid theories like this among skeptics. I'm not going to silent him either, because I believe there ppl have enough education to reject this.
magnusea 2 years ago
I can add that there are other methods with which one dates ice. If he's right then the ice ages and interglaciers would be 10000 and 1000 years, not 10 times longer. Ice core data are consistent with other proxy data in respect to ice ages and the interglaciers! Of course weather partterns idoesn't cause the same lines in the ice as summer and winter.
This hypothesis is crap. I'm a climate skeptic, and not an idiot.
magnusea 2 years ago
thanks for sharing gents. even though I live in Canada I never learned enough about ice to know this.
LeGioNoFZioN 2 years ago
Kent Hovind, a creationist, conspiracy theorist, recently sentenced to 10 years in federal prison?
Gee, let's hear what he has to say ;D
greyflcn 2 years ago
Incidentally, here's a detailed debunk on the criminal preacher's interpretation of "science".
greyfalcon. net/ hovind
Kind of scary how people act like they get to have their own version of reality.
Where the earth is only 6000 years old, the laws of thermodynamics don't exist, and plate tectonics never happened....
Good times.
greyflcn 2 years ago
I did my research after seeing this, thanks for the update but you are about a week too late. appreciate the attempt to clarify though
LeGioNoFZioN 2 years ago
.This is common sense any one can go out on one of Minnesotas frozen lakes in mid March, find a spot without tracks made by man or beast ad find several layers created in a single winter season. It is dishonest to believe each layer represents a single year.
coldwarvet75 2 years ago 4
Amen M4GW it is a little much to discover that both Santa & the Easter Bunny are pretend at the same time.
coldwarvet75 2 years ago
the Easter Bunny?
huh? no way
1LBRTY 2 years ago
Follow the money, and then decide if man made global warming is science or politics. Over 31,000 scientists have signed a petition disputing man made global warming. Politician Al Gore has declared the issue as decided science while he collects millions in his carbon credit schemes. The Political class and Academia have money and power to gain in perpetuating the man made global warming myth. They have money, power, and face to loose if Global Warming is determined to be a hoax.
coldwarvet75 2 years ago 4
re: coldwarvet75
Really, could you perhaps show me where shows the credentials of these so called "scientists"?
Because frankly, they are pulling your leg.
greyfalcon. net/ oism
greyfalcon. net/ oism2
greyflcn 2 years ago
I did not site any scientists. It is my own experience as an ice fisherman. I have experienced hitting several layers of different ice cutting a single hole. I do not need a PHD to figure out that each layer of ice does not represent twelve months.
coldwarvet75 2 years ago 2
Good point, I don't know if I'd cite a creationist or flat earther to prove a point, though.
quuaa1 2 years ago 2
True, its maybe not such a good idea to burst more than one misconception at a time.
M4GW 2 years ago