The final it's "painful" for me (as a punch to the stomach), 'cause I'm always been a great Schumacher fan and that day (the British-GP day) I've not dined, so I was worried and pissed for the Micheal accident.
@DerAdler82 you do remember though that that crash was entirely schumacher's own fault, not only did he bugger up the breaking, but he was the only driver that, apparently, didn't notice that the red flags were out and was still racing as hard as he could. that's not just shear stupidity, its neglagence, potentially putting other's lives at risk. he deserves very little sympathy for that incident.
@DerAdler82 "his breaking system was not yet working proprely; that's why he lost control of his car", erm, the temperatures are always a little off at the start, he knew this full well, every drive knows that, so it's no excuse, it's not like it was his first race! the marshals post on the hanger straight was showing red flags, that's why all the other's, including irvine, who was in front, had slowed down 2/3 of the way down it. long and short, it was his own fault, his most costly mistake.
It's obviously senseless carry on this discussion, 'cause you are too biased about him and, whatever I will tell you, you'll keep your ideas anyway (wrong or right they're).
The only suggestion: get a recording of the 1st start of the F1 British GP, and reformulate your thoughts based on what you see, not on the basis of the tv-comments or the post-race comments from detractors.
@DerAdler82 erm... i do have a recording of the event, and have seen it many times. it was his mistake. maybe it is you who should re think your biased views, just a suggestion as you've indicated your personal views about the man, however i have not, you don't know mine. though i'll agree with you that it's obviously senseless to carry on this discussion, because you are obviously too biased about him and whatever i well tell you, you'll keep your ideas anyway(whether they be right or wrong).
oooh, impressive explanation of the events... You're so sad man: what's the point of this sentence? It's senseless! That's just your opinion, not facts.
Maybe you need an extra-view of the race start, 'cause your words looks like a verdict, instead of an objective comment.
He didn't started well, loosing few positions and, starting from the first corners, he was trying to recover its position in order to save time (due the pit-stops strategies).
If you know what you're talking about, you should know how important is not be stuck, at the race start, behind to slower cars (as the Irvine's one was).
And that's what he was trying to achive, with the competitive spirit of a race, using the throttle/brake delay, near the curves.
Because the accident happened in the really first curves, the braking system was not yet working properly ('cause still too cold) and that's why he wasn't able to control his car and missed the track.
That's was the only Schumacher's error, secondary - by my prospective - respect of the Ferrari's huge one, missing to comunicate him that the race had been suspended (as all teams did).
And arguing about the RED FLAG, I'm sorry to say it once again: no videos shows Schumacher fighting with E.Irvine, with any race stewart near the track, waving that f*cking flag. All the videos available, shows just them fighting.. no flags around..
If you've any that proves what you're saying, please POST IT.
@DerAdler82 oh dear, right, i thought we'd agreed that not continuing with this was the best course of action here, particularly not to act out with such vitriol. but seeing as you've spent so much time i shall reply, it'd be rude not to. i'll ignore all the language usage that doesn't really make sense, after all, english may not be your first language(in which case a genuine well done to you), and my use of the language is far from expert. but here goes...
@DerAdler82 to explain my sentence that you quoted, the point of the sentence was to tell u that i have seen it, and that i've seen it many times, and that from this, and my knowledge of f1(which is rather extensive, i've been obsessed for the past 20yrs), i concluded, as have most others, that it was his fault. you certainly can't be castigating me for expressing my view as fact, when that is exactly what you are doing too. oh and yes, those words are a verdict, but also an objective comment...
@DerAdler82 you are right, he didn't start well, and would have wanted to get by irvine. however, you are wrong with your suggestions as to how much of a problem this would have been. remember, this was before the rule banning team orders came about, it was written in irvine's contract that he had to move over to let schumacher through when asked. and ferrari would have soon enough if irvine was holding him up, they've done it countless times. you entire 2nd post merely proves my entire point...
@DerAdler82 my point being that it was entirely his own fault. yes it was the first lap, yes the breaks, and more particularly the tires(seeing as they ride the breaks on the parade lap, break heating on the parade lap is far more effective than their tire heating efforts) would not have been up to full operating temperature quite yet. but schumacher wasn't exactly a rookie, he was well aware of this fact, he's managed to not stuff it up hundreds of other times. this time, however, he saw...
@DerAdler82 ...irvine slowing up, and tried to dive for the inside, breaked far too sharply for breaks he knew full well would not quite be where he needed them, locked up, therefore lost virtually all retardation, didn't ease off of the breaks again, which would have unlocked them and allowed them to actually slow the car a bit. and well, we all know what happened then, spearing off into the barrier. if he had have lifted off, well, he probably would have run wide, a bit, and been punished...
@DerAdler82 ...for overtaking under red flag conditions. possibly by being black flagged, and then likely a subsequent ban from a few races. even though the overtake wouldn't have been successful, attempting to do so is rather more than frowned upon. so the long and short is, locking the breaks so badly was his fault, okay, 1st lap it's tricky, but fact is he knew that full well, therefore that is his fault, it could not be the fault of anyone else. then he didn't ease off of the breaks, to...
@DerAdler82 ...to unlock them, allowing him to slow down a bit. only he could have done that, you see f1 drivers doing it all the time, it's a pretty basic skill. if you lock up, ease off so the wheels can rotate yet still be slowing you down. if he had of done this, he'd almost certainly not broken his leg, the way the fia worked back then he might have been lucky enough to have even stayed in the race. so, could any body else lift off for him? no. ergo, this was also his fault...
@DerAdler82 now, even if there was no red flag for him to see, and even if ferrari hadn't have told him, the accident would still have been entirely schumacher's own fault, there is no way a driver of his calibre should be locking up his wheels that badly, regardless of it being the first lap. even when rookies do that it's frowned upon, because they should know better. however, about the red flag, i've tried to find a clip on here to quote, but cannot find anything but amateur footage...
@DerAdler82 ...which doesn't show the necessary views. if you could find one maybe you would be so kind, i don't know why the onus of proof should lie solely in my court. especially as you say the footage that proves there were no flags shows "just them fighting", erm, they were not fighting, irvine had slowed up for the red flag. it is one of your deffences for schumacher, after all that irvine was told when he wasn't, so therefore how could this footage show them fighting? now,on that point...
@DerAdler82 ...even if ferrari say they didn't tell him, that is no proof that they did, seeing as you are demanding proof, be so demanding of your view points too. remember, ferrari ran with very strict encryption on their communications until very recently, taking the two base principals that ferrari have been untruthful/deceptive on numerous occasions, and schumacher has "missed" various flags and orders on various other occasions, it's far from unreasonable to conclude that they did...
@DerAdler82 ...did tell him, but say they didn't to ensure shcumacher didn't receive any punishment for disobeying the rules. after all, any likely punishment aimed at him would have been more costly for the team than a punishment aimed at them. that's just the way things work in f1. also, do you really think it's likely that ferrari would tell irvine, but "forget" to tell their beloved schumacher? that's far from likely, schumacher was the focus of the entire team, all their efforts...
@DerAdler82 ...then the claimed lack of flags itself, now i've already said i couldn't find footage that shows anything on here to direct you towards, only things showing the end of the incident, but i'm sure there's a marshal's post 2/3rds the way down the hanger straight which had flags out in time, after all, from watching on the tele, the first we knew of the red flag situation was seeing the physical flags being waived, and we knew this before they got anywhere near the breaking zone...
@DerAdler82 ...from all that is known it's most likely shumi, caught up in the moment, the desire to get by irvine, didn't hear the radio&missed the flags, neither of these would have been a first for schumacher, and then ballsed it up, rather badly, under breaking. even if i'm wrong about the first parts here, about the radio and flags, him breaking his leg was entirely his own fault because he should not have stuffed up the breaking so badly, knowing the breaks weren't at optimum temp...
@DerAdler82 ....so, based off all of this i still stand by my very 1st assertion, that u shouldn't feel much sympathy for schumacher with respect to his leg breaking incident, arguably he was negligent, if he wasn't his team were, even if that is the case, he made a mistake, and compounded his mistake, in a huge way, a manner in which a rookie would be criticised. you shouldn't lock up your breaks that badly at any time, even the first lap, if you do, you ease off of them. so...it was his fault.
@DerAdler82 by the by, sorry for that going on for quite so long, i like to try to make sure that, even if i'm not agreed with, my points are understood, so end up rambling. anyway, this now is this end of this particular instalment of this tome.
I appreciate the time u spent to reply to me, so don't worry to have wrote that much.
Btw, I won't reply each point, 'cause otherwise we could stay here forever, exchanging comments...quite senseless, as we both said, moreover considering our different point of view.
I'm Italian, so English isn't my 1st language; I'm really sorry to crippling your language that bad, but I tried to do my best, arranging the few words I know.
Next time we should try in Italian: I'll I give vent to all my tech-dic.
@DerAdler82 thank you very much. just to clarify again, i wasn't mocking your use of english, i was acknowledging that, rather obviously, many if not most people commenting on youtube are using their 2nd/3rd language, normally english. my comment in this respect was a genuine well done if you weren't using your 1st language, as it turns out you aren't. personally i wish i wasn't british, maybe then i'd be able to speak another language, unfortunately i have trouble enough with my native tongue.
As you said, we're arguing about nothing: the official explanation by FIA & Ferrari was that ADR datas, together to Ferrari's telemetries, confirmed a mechanical failure, due a suddently loosening of the nut brake bleeding, on the left rear wheel. That's it.
And no red flag can be see on Schumacher's camera-car and in the "near crash area" videos: see ==> watch?v=NSGS5BPA4CQ#t=2m24s (I advise you to lower the speakers volume, LOL).
Oh, forgot that: I watch F1 since I was 6yo. I'm 28 now. Bye
Yep, but they sure as hell are taking flight. If it wasn't then when the goal of flight travel was accomplished, watching this clip lets me know that humans would have discovered the ability to fly machines sooner or later. lmao
2:07のはセルジオ・サンタナーの死亡事故だったっけ?
TAGUTAGU92 8 months ago
Just my 2 cents, but I think the LeMans crash has nothing to do in a video like this.
Krakaklat 9 months ago
途中サーキットを横切った鳥は何だ?www
kenq9 11 months ago
The singing is terrible.
jimmywrangles 11 months ago
its that a boost cheat from Gran Turismo 4 at 0:42? xD
twr45 1 year ago
スポンサー涙目ww
1994929ABE 1 year ago
This is burnout in real life. Even the song fits!!!1
Ztrainbug 1 year ago
3:08 lol. nana nana nana nana nana nana nana nanaaaaa, bat-maaaaan!!!!
gtett 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
2:25 wow, they did a good job making sure future generations wouldnt get to enjoy those cars... =/
gtett 1 year ago
Comment removed
gtett 1 year ago
0,36 haha
MultiDiabel 1 year ago
jw in the crash at 2:06 which was fatal which driver died was it the driver of the yellow car
metallife365 1 year ago
Nihongo desu ka ne?
PaintballIt 1 year ago
Wow, rocketpowered McLaren F1...^^
MPZRACEVIDEO 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free Energy is real and it's here but the coverup is strong, if u r interested in a REAL free energy magnet motor then
just go to LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM and download the blueprints ,it's probably the ONLY working magnet
motor out there. Join the free energy revolution!!
affluenceclm 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free Energy is real and it's here! The Oil companies r doing everything they can to stop this
information. If you want a Free energy magnet motor , get the blueprints at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM , Join the
revolution!
graywackeknifebdr 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free Energy is real and its here but the coverup is strong, if u r interested in a REAL free energy magnet motor then
just go to LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM and download the blueprints ,it's probably the ONLY working magnet
motor out there. Join the free energy revolution!!
baccaratbargaineq 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free Energy is real and its here! The Oil companies r doing everything they can to stop this
information. If you want a Free energy magnet motor , get the blueprints at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM , Join the
revolution!
breeannaqktjbl 1 year ago
2:30 カーズに出てるハドソンホーネットが出てるかな?
rkmario2009 1 year ago
nice vid :)
nathanOII 1 year ago
Comment removed
minato0722 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
さいこおおおおおおおおおおおおおおおおおおおおおおおおおおおおおおおおおおおおおお
daijin098 2 years ago
epic fail
MrUltraFly 2 years ago
weres collection 1 and 2 and 4 etc?
rcnuub 2 years ago
Hey Great videO :D.... and Great Music
Name Song Plz :D
TheMoises07 2 years ago
that songs in burnout 3... fitting
CorporalElm 2 years ago
lmao... 2:26- 2:44 biggest crash probebly history thats like 30 cars lol!..
mosportkarting6 2 years ago
actually there were 37 cars involved in that one
*just type "1960 NASCAR Daytona 500" on the search engine and look for the first or second vid at the results page*
ma55aracin9 2 years ago
2:22 WTF SO STUPID DRIVERS xP
misticos90 2 years ago
met zun alle xD
Driftunitz 2 years ago
1:04 is from Le Mans '55, 80 people died
3:35 door owned XD ahahah
Robi9944 2 years ago
esta guapisimo
diaverso100 2 years ago
Camera Owned At 1:33!
>:-) = Thake that camera! XD
123Anthony45 2 years ago
i have always wonder why people stand so colse to the road in rally car races good way tto get hurt
ridley9000 2 years ago
2:07 One guy had the sense to think the cars are no longer on the track so the safest place is on the track.
At 3:45, Thats pretty minor considering the possible outcome's.
0:27, Hey check this out, I'm gonna do a mctwist.
blyndrotor 2 years ago
is one crass at santer pod
stevehydeaaronhyde 2 years ago
What happened at 01:02? Is that a car exploading ???
sibailey1 2 years ago
What happened at 01:02 is that a car exloading???
sibailey1 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
wtf your taste of music is horrible.
you fail.
mrnice88x 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
nice video =D
tswhchan 2 years ago
1:02 is one of the worst crashes in the history of racing 80 people died there and after i1989 mercedes got again in le mans
ozilevin200 2 years ago
every single one of ur vids take years to load?!?!?
but they rock
rexbloke 2 years ago
whith me they dont but i only seen one im gonna look formore. 5/5
Mitsubushi99 2 years ago
3:09 - NITROOOOOOOOO!!!!!11
marcel863 2 years ago 8
LMAO At 0:36
123Anthony45 2 years ago 2
COOL
Kolac1980 3 years ago
The final it's "painful" for me (as a punch to the stomach), 'cause I'm always been a great Schumacher fan and that day (the British-GP day) I've not dined, so I was worried and pissed for the Micheal accident.
omg, bad memories!!
DerAdler82 3 years ago 4
@DerAdler82 you do remember though that that crash was entirely schumacher's own fault, not only did he bugger up the breaking, but he was the only driver that, apparently, didn't notice that the red flags were out and was still racing as hard as he could. that's not just shear stupidity, its neglagence, potentially putting other's lives at risk. he deserves very little sympathy for that incident.
MrTautologist 1 year ago
@MrTautologist: well, actually he didn't get any red flag 'till he crashed; the ones you saw, were just on your TV screen and on the starting grid.
No race-stewards showed him any flag (there's the camera-car video proving that).
He was fighting with E.Irvine for the lead and his breaking system was not yet working proprely; that's why he lost control of his car and crashed.
Anyway, the main fault was by Ferrari's box, that didn't reported him - via Radio - that the race had been suspended.
DerAdler82 1 year ago
@DerAdler82 "his breaking system was not yet working proprely; that's why he lost control of his car", erm, the temperatures are always a little off at the start, he knew this full well, every drive knows that, so it's no excuse, it's not like it was his first race! the marshals post on the hanger straight was showing red flags, that's why all the other's, including irvine, who was in front, had slowed down 2/3 of the way down it. long and short, it was his own fault, his most costly mistake.
MrTautologist 1 year ago
@MrTautologist: mate I guess you really need a rest.
It's obviously senseless carry on this discussion, 'cause you are too biased about him and, whatever I will tell you, you'll keep your ideas anyway (wrong or right they're).
The only suggestion: get a recording of the 1st start of the F1 British GP, and reformulate your thoughts based on what you see, not on the basis of the tv-comments or the post-race comments from detractors.
DerAdler82 1 year ago
@DerAdler82 erm... i do have a recording of the event, and have seen it many times. it was his mistake. maybe it is you who should re think your biased views, just a suggestion as you've indicated your personal views about the man, however i have not, you don't know mine. though i'll agree with you that it's obviously senseless to carry on this discussion, because you are obviously too biased about him and whatever i well tell you, you'll keep your ideas anyway(whether they be right or wrong).
MrTautologist 1 year ago
"have seen it many times. it was his mistake."
oooh, impressive explanation of the events... You're so sad man: what's the point of this sentence? It's senseless! That's just your opinion, not facts.
Maybe you need an extra-view of the race start, 'cause your words looks like a verdict, instead of an objective comment.
He didn't started well, loosing few positions and, starting from the first corners, he was trying to recover its position in order to save time (due the pit-stops strategies).
DerAdler82 1 year ago
If you know what you're talking about, you should know how important is not be stuck, at the race start, behind to slower cars (as the Irvine's one was).
And that's what he was trying to achive, with the competitive spirit of a race, using the throttle/brake delay, near the curves.
Because the accident happened in the really first curves, the braking system was not yet working properly ('cause still too cold) and that's why he wasn't able to control his car and missed the track.
DerAdler82 1 year ago
That's was the only Schumacher's error, secondary - by my prospective - respect of the Ferrari's huge one, missing to comunicate him that the race had been suspended (as all teams did).
And arguing about the RED FLAG, I'm sorry to say it once again: no videos shows Schumacher fighting with E.Irvine, with any race stewart near the track, waving that f*cking flag. All the videos available, shows just them fighting.. no flags around..
If you've any that proves what you're saying, please POST IT.
DerAdler82 1 year ago
@DerAdler82 oh dear, right, i thought we'd agreed that not continuing with this was the best course of action here, particularly not to act out with such vitriol. but seeing as you've spent so much time i shall reply, it'd be rude not to. i'll ignore all the language usage that doesn't really make sense, after all, english may not be your first language(in which case a genuine well done to you), and my use of the language is far from expert. but here goes...
MrTautologist 1 year ago
@DerAdler82 to explain my sentence that you quoted, the point of the sentence was to tell u that i have seen it, and that i've seen it many times, and that from this, and my knowledge of f1(which is rather extensive, i've been obsessed for the past 20yrs), i concluded, as have most others, that it was his fault. you certainly can't be castigating me for expressing my view as fact, when that is exactly what you are doing too. oh and yes, those words are a verdict, but also an objective comment...
MrTautologist 1 year ago
@DerAdler82 you are right, he didn't start well, and would have wanted to get by irvine. however, you are wrong with your suggestions as to how much of a problem this would have been. remember, this was before the rule banning team orders came about, it was written in irvine's contract that he had to move over to let schumacher through when asked. and ferrari would have soon enough if irvine was holding him up, they've done it countless times. you entire 2nd post merely proves my entire point...
MrTautologist 1 year ago
@DerAdler82 my point being that it was entirely his own fault. yes it was the first lap, yes the breaks, and more particularly the tires(seeing as they ride the breaks on the parade lap, break heating on the parade lap is far more effective than their tire heating efforts) would not have been up to full operating temperature quite yet. but schumacher wasn't exactly a rookie, he was well aware of this fact, he's managed to not stuff it up hundreds of other times. this time, however, he saw...
MrTautologist 1 year ago
@DerAdler82 ...irvine slowing up, and tried to dive for the inside, breaked far too sharply for breaks he knew full well would not quite be where he needed them, locked up, therefore lost virtually all retardation, didn't ease off of the breaks again, which would have unlocked them and allowed them to actually slow the car a bit. and well, we all know what happened then, spearing off into the barrier. if he had have lifted off, well, he probably would have run wide, a bit, and been punished...
MrTautologist 1 year ago
@DerAdler82 ...for overtaking under red flag conditions. possibly by being black flagged, and then likely a subsequent ban from a few races. even though the overtake wouldn't have been successful, attempting to do so is rather more than frowned upon. so the long and short is, locking the breaks so badly was his fault, okay, 1st lap it's tricky, but fact is he knew that full well, therefore that is his fault, it could not be the fault of anyone else. then he didn't ease off of the breaks, to...
MrTautologist 1 year ago
@DerAdler82 ...to unlock them, allowing him to slow down a bit. only he could have done that, you see f1 drivers doing it all the time, it's a pretty basic skill. if you lock up, ease off so the wheels can rotate yet still be slowing you down. if he had of done this, he'd almost certainly not broken his leg, the way the fia worked back then he might have been lucky enough to have even stayed in the race. so, could any body else lift off for him? no. ergo, this was also his fault...
MrTautologist 1 year ago
@DerAdler82 now, even if there was no red flag for him to see, and even if ferrari hadn't have told him, the accident would still have been entirely schumacher's own fault, there is no way a driver of his calibre should be locking up his wheels that badly, regardless of it being the first lap. even when rookies do that it's frowned upon, because they should know better. however, about the red flag, i've tried to find a clip on here to quote, but cannot find anything but amateur footage...
MrTautologist 1 year ago
@DerAdler82 ...which doesn't show the necessary views. if you could find one maybe you would be so kind, i don't know why the onus of proof should lie solely in my court. especially as you say the footage that proves there were no flags shows "just them fighting", erm, they were not fighting, irvine had slowed up for the red flag. it is one of your deffences for schumacher, after all that irvine was told when he wasn't, so therefore how could this footage show them fighting? now,on that point...
MrTautologist 1 year ago
@DerAdler82 ...even if ferrari say they didn't tell him, that is no proof that they did, seeing as you are demanding proof, be so demanding of your view points too. remember, ferrari ran with very strict encryption on their communications until very recently, taking the two base principals that ferrari have been untruthful/deceptive on numerous occasions, and schumacher has "missed" various flags and orders on various other occasions, it's far from unreasonable to conclude that they did...
MrTautologist 1 year ago
@DerAdler82 ...did tell him, but say they didn't to ensure shcumacher didn't receive any punishment for disobeying the rules. after all, any likely punishment aimed at him would have been more costly for the team than a punishment aimed at them. that's just the way things work in f1. also, do you really think it's likely that ferrari would tell irvine, but "forget" to tell their beloved schumacher? that's far from likely, schumacher was the focus of the entire team, all their efforts...
MrTautologist 1 year ago
@DerAdler82 ...then the claimed lack of flags itself, now i've already said i couldn't find footage that shows anything on here to direct you towards, only things showing the end of the incident, but i'm sure there's a marshal's post 2/3rds the way down the hanger straight which had flags out in time, after all, from watching on the tele, the first we knew of the red flag situation was seeing the physical flags being waived, and we knew this before they got anywhere near the breaking zone...
MrTautologist 1 year ago
@DerAdler82 ...from all that is known it's most likely shumi, caught up in the moment, the desire to get by irvine, didn't hear the radio&missed the flags, neither of these would have been a first for schumacher, and then ballsed it up, rather badly, under breaking. even if i'm wrong about the first parts here, about the radio and flags, him breaking his leg was entirely his own fault because he should not have stuffed up the breaking so badly, knowing the breaks weren't at optimum temp...
MrTautologist 1 year ago
@DerAdler82 ....so, based off all of this i still stand by my very 1st assertion, that u shouldn't feel much sympathy for schumacher with respect to his leg breaking incident, arguably he was negligent, if he wasn't his team were, even if that is the case, he made a mistake, and compounded his mistake, in a huge way, a manner in which a rookie would be criticised. you shouldn't lock up your breaks that badly at any time, even the first lap, if you do, you ease off of them. so...it was his fault.
MrTautologist 1 year ago
@DerAdler82 by the by, sorry for that going on for quite so long, i like to try to make sure that, even if i'm not agreed with, my points are understood, so end up rambling. anyway, this now is this end of this particular instalment of this tome.
MrTautologist 1 year ago
I appreciate the time u spent to reply to me, so don't worry to have wrote that much.
Btw, I won't reply each point, 'cause otherwise we could stay here forever, exchanging comments...quite senseless, as we both said, moreover considering our different point of view.
I'm Italian, so English isn't my 1st language; I'm really sorry to crippling your language that bad, but I tried to do my best, arranging the few words I know.
Next time we should try in Italian: I'll I give vent to all my tech-dic.
DerAdler82 1 year ago
@DerAdler82 thank you very much. just to clarify again, i wasn't mocking your use of english, i was acknowledging that, rather obviously, many if not most people commenting on youtube are using their 2nd/3rd language, normally english. my comment in this respect was a genuine well done if you weren't using your 1st language, as it turns out you aren't. personally i wish i wasn't british, maybe then i'd be able to speak another language, unfortunately i have trouble enough with my native tongue.
MrTautologist 1 year ago
As you said, we're arguing about nothing: the official explanation by FIA & Ferrari was that ADR datas, together to Ferrari's telemetries, confirmed a mechanical failure, due a suddently loosening of the nut brake bleeding, on the left rear wheel. That's it.
And no red flag can be see on Schumacher's camera-car and in the "near crash area" videos: see ==> watch?v=NSGS5BPA4CQ#t=2m24s (I advise you to lower the speakers volume, LOL).
Oh, forgot that: I watch F1 since I was 6yo. I'm 28 now. Bye
DerAdler82 1 year ago
i mean 0:42
MaraxHBJDenza 3 years ago
far out 0:40 thats just insane gud vid
MaraxHBJDenza 3 years ago
you like the music from burnout 3 takedown i can see!
ConceptEuphoria 3 years ago 2
0:34,Gary Myers burnout mustang years ago at summernats,the radiator exploded.
falconhell69 3 years ago
Amber Pacific
Always You
どっちかがアーティストかと・・
でもうひとつが曲名かと・・^^;
nascararekore 3 years ago
3:20 damn hes fats hes flaming
wizzman5 3 years ago
at 3.34. i remember watching that mercedes door get hit by the other car, live.
rossy2by5 3 years ago
amber pacific sings this song not finger 11
TOUGHGUYPISS 3 years ago
aren't cars meant to stay on the ground?
hillibillidilligilli 3 years ago 2
Yep, but they sure as hell are taking flight. If it wasn't then when the goal of flight travel was accomplished, watching this clip lets me know that humans would have discovered the ability to fly machines sooner or later. lmao
falconmanf16 3 years ago
one of the la mans races, i forgot for a second
it sounded fuckin terrible, there were people with flaps of skin hanging off and a guy holding onto a fence without any legs
nicksaysword 3 years ago
holy shit dude... my grandfather was at an old race and a car exploded and the engine flew thru the crowd and was cutting ppl in half and shit
nicksaysword 3 years ago
ありがとうございます!!
nascararekore 4 years ago
そうです。
nascararekore 4 years ago
3:30 - who is that escaped from that burning an wasted racing car ?
Brett140 4 years ago
near the 1:00 min., people died there to when shit off the car came in the public
Viperman1979 4 years ago
Is this "Burn Out 3" song?
Zangyakunakikousi 4 years ago
what's the name of this song ?
samupuerto 4 years ago
pause it at 0.14 look how close the williams came
assmasterj 4 years ago
that at 2:00 was in Las Vizcachas, Santiago, Chile, there were 2 or 3 deads I can't remember.
benja1357 4 years ago
Too emo for accidents.
masterofone 4 years ago
THE DUCKIES MADE IT!YAY!
Serjery15 4 years ago 3
sick video, great
vortexboy87 4 years ago
bad because some fatals -> eg LeMans '55
DoomWarriorX 4 years ago
what's the name of this song ?
Ilias25 4 years ago
nice video
ExtremeRacing 5 years ago 2
Mad video mate what is the song I love it
d1damo 5 years ago