How could hating retards make him feel sick? The religious must have the IQ of a down syndrome jellyfish to believe in the idiotic shit that they do, to be honest they don't even deserve to live, I would rather a child become a doctor, than a religious moronic retard who works in a cardboard box factory.
i love this interview you really get to see a different side of dawkins, one much more full of life and hope. I think it would be hard for him to have to be made out as almost 'the devil' by fundamentalists.
Ironically, that book was written by a mormon. Im an atheist and i love that book, so i admire the author, by it amazes me how someone so intelligent can believe in religion.
@FreeTh1nk3r good book and I would support such a thing because theres too many people on the planet. on the other hand I think its morally wrong to tell others what to do in that regard so I can't decide which is worse, forced eugenics or the eventual hardship and misery of Billions of people.
Dead-to-the-spirit deluded "God Delusion" author & blithering fool scientist goon Richard Dawkins another "leader" given 2 the profane masses is another useful idiot 4 Jesuit machinations
Jesuitical; pertaining to the Jesuits or their principals; designing; cunning; deceitful; prevaricating
The Jesuit Order completely altered the education system 2 suit their Evo-Hoax Agenda to discredit the Bible
Papal Rome cant have their Counter Reformation 2nd Dark Age DESPOTISM until Bible is destroyed
I'm all for science, but I do fear cloning and genetic engineering of humans. That scientific realm could cause alot of trouble and I think it's best if we stopped exploring it.
@counterclockwise123 Why? Let's fix our flaws and make a race of happy individuals who don't have to worry about being too short or having a penis that is too small or being too skinny.
@counterclockwise123 I understand your fear of genetic engineering however you are ignoring the huge medical advances which could lead to the elimination of many horrendous genetic diseases.
It wouldn't work. The countries that put greater emphasis on engineering, stem cell research, and training would win. Genetic engineering would be much more efficient than natural selection.
@MatsEP i dont know guy, no matter how desperate and unattractive you are, there's someone more desperate and possibly more attractive within walking distance. More over, i have found that masturbation is faster, cheaper, and all around better, and this after much attempted reproduction.
I am guilty of making jokes about the less intelligent being able to survive due to the efforts of science. Of course, I should realize, and I do realize, that intelligence and education are different things.
Dawkins is an idiot..as are all the other atheist..he will be eaing his words soon mark my words..as soon as he has a bereavement..he will be praying to God..Science doesnt know anything,,,Darwin was proved wrong in his time and he admitted at the end of his life he was wrong..this English idiot has only been listened to because of his accent..he is an idiot
well mr FUCK A DOG you have only had colour televisions for 50 years..flight has only been around for 200 cars 150..i dont think thats very long compared to the complexities and mysteries of the universe over millions of years..like i said Science does not know anything...
@ChooseHeaven I see by your comment that you cannot be very bright. Don’t get lost in thought; you’d be in unfamiliar territory. Instead of writing nonsense about Richard Dawkins and we atheists you should save your breath, as you’ll need it to blow up your date. ~So think before you write and it will save you from setting aside this moment from humiliating yourself. I see you’ve set aside this special time to humiliate yourself
@ChooseHeaven Methinks it is you who is the idiot. Do not get lost in thought you would be in unfamiliar territory. Instead of writing inane comments you should save your breath, you may need it to blow up your date.
Pathetic nonsensicle comment..whooshh..its gone over my head because you know you have nothing meaningful to say...go back to you immoral way of life..indulge in your favourite pastime of incest..who is it today your mother?,,might as well since you dont believe in anything or believe there is any type of punishment out there.
@ChooseHeaven Spoken like a true Christian, you cannot face the truth so you indulge in insults. Do not get lost in thought you would be in unfamiliar territory. I am glad you have chosen this time to write to me to humiliate yourself.
Its YOU who is humiliating yourself dickhead using the same words in your comments..the reason USA is going downhill is because of Atheism and idiots like you representing it. Why dont you stand up for something at the moment you are putting up a very WEAK fight representing NOBODIES with no morals and filthy inclinations..Fuck off before i really start on you.
@ChooseHeaven You keep repeating yourself. Tell you what, you stop telling lies about me and my fellow atheists and I will stop telling the truth about you and your religion.
@ChooseHeaven: if there is one reason the USA is going downhill - it's because its population is born in to a culture that habitually claims singular greatness in its entirity throughout the world as an inherited entitlement.
The greatest divinely created and blessed nation. The best.
Greatness isn't to be aspired to, it isn't earned, it isn't aspired to and striven to be achieved through actions - it's assumed.
It's a cancer on honest self assessment growth and improvement. Its dogmadness
I never reply to comments online, but you couldnt be more right.
I think theres a similar but opposite phenomenon going on here in Britain: we automatically assume (or would prefer) everything to be crap. Theres a real sneering contempt for honest earnestness, idealism and national pride, which manifests as a ridiculous twisted form of snobbery - we have contempt for anyone who genuinely succeeds, or even wants to succeed.
The problem with the culture in the united states that contributes most to its difficulties is a claim that capitalism in its 'purest' form. It has been attached to our basic emotions in that any alternative is construed as 'communism' or 'socialism,' and thus represents a threat to our own individual freedoms. However, as we have been seeing for a while now capitalism run 'rampant' without restriction is cannibalistic-we devour our own and weaken from within.
@ChooseHeaven dude please ... wake up. youre scaring the shit out of me! im beginning to lose every hope that mankind's breeders arent dumb as a cheesetoast sandwich.
The thing about the russian foxes is still going on. Many generations later. It is a sped up breeding of the sort we did to dogs. Essentialy as I understand it it is about prolonging/encouraging the naiveness of the animal because the behaviour of these bred foxes in their adulthood is the same as how they are when young. Basicaly making them survival idiots, because in nature real adulthood is required for survival.
@Hodongji Which guy? Has no answers? Everyone in this clip is serving their cause perfectly, Penn is being a decent radio host and Dawkins is giving the answers that a distinguished biologist on a mission to kill religion would give.
I don't think Penn got the answer he was hoping for with the eugenics discussion. I think it probably is possible to selectively breed for smarter humans, but I don't think our current trend is making the species stupider. I think it's important to note that intelligence does not equal education, class or culture. That and the fact that intelligence has shown fairly low inheritability means I'm not concerned by this idea of "stupid people" breeding.
That Russian silver fox experiment is still on-going. The reason that breeding for tameness lead to dog-like foxes is that the tameness came about by mean of neoteny. Dogs are just neotenous wolves!
Here in America, welfare-recipients receive more free money if they have a lot of children. There's no such incentive to reproduce, for people who support themselves. So, yes, we select for disability, stupidity, and laziness.
And then we wonder why the country is full of zeroes. Duh.
When Richard mentions the idea of a nation who wants to win the Olympic High jump, it reminded me of something I read in "Before The Dawn" where they talked about how people from a certain area of Kenya have the fastest distance running records due to practices that involve people in that area needing to run. I think they were herding sheep or goats from other villages and running them back to their village. And through generations, speed became a natural genetic ability.
I think another bigf reason, besides Hitler, that the idea of "human breeding" has fallen out of favor–or, more correctly, the reason the idea used to be more popular–is that people today are not dependent on domesticated animals the way they were 150 years ago. I can see how eugenics might have made a lot more sense to people who regularly compared the bloodlines of the horses that pulled their carriages and farm equipment. The idea of breeding was just a fact of life for people back then.
In the grand scheme of things one or two more atheist kids aren't going to make a big difference. What will make a difference is society itself evolving to the point where truth is praised and myths are discarded.
With the atheist population growing faster than ever, it's nonsense to worry about who is having more children.
@flapjackboy "Easy way to control the levels of stupid people in the population:
Remove all warning labels."
We got another stupid one. Don't breed, bro.
"Easy way to control the levels of stupid people in the population:
Print clear, obvious warning labels with detailed explanations and a 'did you know' text box referencing the scientific understanding behind the ingredients"
Dawkins did say that Eugenics is possible, but I think from the tone of his voice he is completely against it. Like Penn it is quite disgusting and I don't think we should mess in that kind of science with people. Just for the reason Dawkins states that you could breed some desirable trait, but you would also end up with some trait you where not counting on that would be very undesirable.
I don't think people talk about outbreeding the idiot as a genetics way, but as with intelligent people, their offspring get better education without the prejudice and the superstition of their parent passed on them. When idiot and bigot reproduce more, they get more vote for their idea that they pass on to their children. Thus making idiotic policy.
@coprographia I think most people are disgusted by that, and if they aren't, they know how much shit they'd get for it if they supported it. It's like one step removed from being racist. Maybe a lot of people do support it though, I may just be imagining this because, I promise, I actually find it disgusting, I'm not just saying that so I won't appear to be almost racist.
@coprographia I feel it's more insidious than racism because it can easily be presented in a way that is innocuous, or in a way that people seem to agree with it.
@coprographia wuddnt you like to be born with a stroner body and a stronger mind tho? i kno we are who we are now, but wudnt you like ur kids to be stronger more intelligent human beings?
@coprographia yes that was part of the fox study tho. they gave aggressive fox kits to tame fox moms who raised them but they remained agressive implying nature was stronger than nurture. and i dont think it makes us livestock. see thing is we try to cure disease so if we can affect disease on a genetic scale it wud be a cure. so we cure your family line of being susceptable to brain anurisms. then we start breeding for stenghth , intelligence... i think it gets slippery
Why? I don’t understand why it’s so terrible. If stupid and intelligence has a genetic component which it obviously does it is plausible that it could work. I don’t see the harm in trying to increase the frequency of intelligence conducive genes in a population as long as people's liberties are not infringed upon in doing so. I am not sure how effective it will be and i wouldn’t both myself. But if others want to what is so terrible about it?
Smart people volunteering to donate large amounts of their eggs or sperm and large numbers of people choosing to use said eggs and sperm to have children. If you think my method is flawed, i don’t care. Just because i cannot think of a way of ending world poverty without force does not mean that there isn’t one and it defiantly doesn’t mean ending world poverty is evil. It probably means i lack the skills knowledge and resources.
Yeah, good idea smartie. You hate the idea of people trying to improve the gene pool even if they don’t hurt anyone in the process but like the idea of people mutilating themselves if they don’t agree with you. You’re so a righteous.
@antonyneal "Just because i cannot think of a way of ending world poverty without force does not mean that there isn’t one and it defiantly doesn’t mean ending world poverty is evil"
I'm very extremely curious right now: explain a scenario under which "force" would "end world poverty"?
@coprographia There's the kind of people who think of themselves as highly intelligent and wish they could get laid despite the anti-intellectual American zeitgeist. But there's also the type that has seen actual statistics showing that religious people breed exponentially faster than non-believers, and that most people indoctrinated in childhood remain believers their whole life. In light of this undeniable FACT, some get nightmares about what the world will look like half a century from now.
Reducto ad odium? :P It's interesting you assumed I'm in favor of eugenics even though all I've done is present two points of view, to which you responded like the classic internet tough guy. Well, tough guy, why don't you rip your own dick off and show me how it's done?
@coprographia I think trying to "outbreed the stupid people" qualifies you for celibacy.
Like the foxes and the collies and others, if you breed for a desirable trait you're also breeding for several unexpected traits. And further, the bigger point is:
If you're too dumb to realize that the "stupid people" problem is actually a "stupid education system" problem, then you probably shouldn't be breeding a large flock.
In short: stupidity is not a genetic problem, stupid.
Nobody who really understands evolution flirts with eugenics, it's just a thin veneer of science spread over a lot of self-entitled classist or racist horseshit.
I mean, call me cold-hearted if you want, but I'd rather see any deadbeat dad/mother made to have their reproductive organs removed than to see my taxes increased to subsidize their irresponsible behaviors..
Eugenics practices by the Nazi party was arguably more about silencing race and political tendencies than inferior genetics. I'm not going to prevaricate about the bush.. Personal responsibility seems to be slipping away in modern America, and in that light, I do in fact support eugenics to a degree.
@jakematters I liked Doug Stanhope's idea of "Incentive-based Eugenics" where we get undesirable people to castrate themselves by giving out white trash prizes n' stuff.
Yeah, nice to hear Dawkins admit that eugenics could actually work. Too many people dismiss it as pseudo-science, no doubt because of the nazi connection.
Well it's wishthinking.. Regardless though I found the discussion to be interesting I don't know what it is about eugenics but the subject for some reason manages to capture my fascination. I especially enjoyed that little thing he said about the russians who were breading foxes that ended up coming out looking like Collie's. That part is cool.
I've been saying the same for a long time, after researching it a few years ago. The Nazis definitely ruined eugenics for the 20th century, though in the 1930's you could say the epicentre of it was in the United States.
N.B.: the father of eugenics, Francis Galton, was Charles Darwin's cousin (Galton also did research about the occurence of genius in families...).
You carnt test Richy d.
juren669 4 days ago
How could hating retards make him feel sick? The religious must have the IQ of a down syndrome jellyfish to believe in the idiotic shit that they do, to be honest they don't even deserve to live, I would rather a child become a doctor, than a religious moronic retard who works in a cardboard box factory.
oBLACKIECHANoo 2 weeks ago
this is big bad dawkins? he's very reasonable
MrROTD 1 month ago in playlist More videos from UTbone04 5
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrROTD "this is big bad dawkins? he's very reasonable"
Exactly! Atheists are labeled strident and radical for having the nerve to disagree with the theists.
TomVodkaCollins 3 weeks ago in playlist More videos from UTbone04
i love this interview you really get to see a different side of dawkins, one much more full of life and hope. I think it would be hard for him to have to be made out as almost 'the devil' by fundamentalists.
XepicmeauX 1 month ago
In the book "Ender's Game" The government would only allow geniuses to have children because the survival of the human race depended on it.
FreeTh1nk3r 1 month ago
@FreeTh1nk3r
Ironically, that book was written by a mormon. Im an atheist and i love that book, so i admire the author, by it amazes me how someone so intelligent can believe in religion.
TheDunefanatic 1 month ago
@TheDunefanatic I think he didnt believe, he was so smart he recognised he could control gullible and stupid people and become wealthy and powerful
MrROTD 1 month ago in playlist More videos from UTbone04
@MrROTD I don´t understand your comment. I was talking about Orson Scott Card, the author of Ender´s Game.
TheDunefanatic 2 days ago
@FreeTh1nk3r good book and I would support such a thing because theres too many people on the planet. on the other hand I think its morally wrong to tell others what to do in that regard so I can't decide which is worse, forced eugenics or the eventual hardship and misery of Billions of people.
MrROTD 1 month ago in playlist More videos from UTbone04
The whole time he was talking about unwanted results from selective human breeding, one word kept going through my head: "Khaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaan!"
ShawnRavenfire 1 month ago
Richard Dawkins is a hot sexy man.
martyaus2905 1 month ago 4
and now foxes are domesticated :)
vendetta89 2 months ago
haha, Penn has a funny laugh
funkyguyxxx 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dead-to-the-spirit deluded "God Delusion" author & blithering fool scientist goon Richard Dawkins another "leader" given 2 the profane masses is another useful idiot 4 Jesuit machinations
Jesuitical; pertaining to the Jesuits or their principals; designing; cunning; deceitful; prevaricating
The Jesuit Order completely altered the education system 2 suit their Evo-Hoax Agenda to discredit the Bible
Papal Rome cant have their Counter Reformation 2nd Dark Age DESPOTISM until Bible is destroyed
SpencerBenedict2nd 4 months ago
my biology teacher told me to have children with a tall man. and I did.
MsMaggieOC 4 months ago
@MsMaggieOC was he the tall man? you should probably tell an adult... :/
panterasux22 3 months ago
@panterasux22 lol! no, she was a very short woman. My kids have a better shot being tall now though.
MsMaggieOC 2 months ago
I'm all for science, but I do fear cloning and genetic engineering of humans. That scientific realm could cause alot of trouble and I think it's best if we stopped exploring it.
counterclockwise123 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@counterclockwise123 Why? Let's fix our flaws and make a race of happy individuals who don't have to worry about being too short or having a penis that is too small or being too skinny.
Luigi84289 3 months ago
@counterclockwise123 I understand your fear of genetic engineering however you are ignoring the huge medical advances which could lead to the elimination of many horrendous genetic diseases.
hungryman211 3 months ago
@4:33,
It wouldn't work. The countries that put greater emphasis on engineering, stem cell research, and training would win. Genetic engineering would be much more efficient than natural selection.
MegaAstrodude 4 months ago
"It's pretty easy to reproduce if you want to"... Easy for you to say, mister famous scientist :(
MatsEP 4 months ago 83
@MatsEP then natural selection will end your legacy :)
thelws 2 months ago
@MatsEP i dont know guy, no matter how desperate and unattractive you are, there's someone more desperate and possibly more attractive within walking distance. More over, i have found that masturbation is faster, cheaper, and all around better, and this after much attempted reproduction.
thesearewarningsigns 2 months ago
@MatsEP Hahahah I share your pain buddy :(
Maddolis 2 months ago
@MatsEP Forever alone...
Shoesarequiteuseful 1 month ago
@MatsEP What is your problem with Mr. Dawkins saying that?
zideffil 2 days ago
We don't have to outbreed stupid people, we just have to exterminate them.
fdasherv 4 months ago
@fdasherv That's quite redundant.
Getlowend1812 4 months ago
I am guilty of making jokes about the less intelligent being able to survive due to the efforts of science. Of course, I should realize, and I do realize, that intelligence and education are different things.
GenghisCohen1 5 months ago
never thought about that the fox would become more relaxed and not have to have its ears as rigid and ready.
Razz000 5 months ago
3:03 he believed in inbreeding?
Groth1175 6 months ago
@rodiel89
Greatest man that ever lived?..you are easily pleased..
ChooseHeaven 6 months ago
Dawkins is an idiot..as are all the other atheist..he will be eaing his words soon mark my words..as soon as he has a bereavement..he will be praying to God..Science doesnt know anything,,,Darwin was proved wrong in his time and he admitted at the end of his life he was wrong..this English idiot has only been listened to because of his accent..he is an idiot
ChooseHeaven 6 months ago
@ChooseHeaven "Science doesnt know anything"
hahahah you fucking idiot. without science you would a) not be living right now, and b) not be typing your asinine comment.
You are the reason why people want eugenics:)
fcdog555 6 months ago
@fcdog555
well mr FUCK A DOG you have only had colour televisions for 50 years..flight has only been around for 200 cars 150..i dont think thats very long compared to the complexities and mysteries of the universe over millions of years..like i said Science does not know anything...
ChooseHeaven 6 months ago
@ChooseHeaven Flight hasn't been around for 200 years.........
Pretty sure ive decided that ChooseHeaven doesn't know anything
sweetvids2 6 months ago
@sweetvids2 Indeed.
TheYouthHeroic 6 months ago
@ChooseHeaven penis
fcdog555 6 months ago
@ChooseHeaven is "FUCK A DOG" in the bible you read?
Misterdave5555 6 months ago
@Misterdave5555
Get real!!...being religious doesnt mean you cant swear at idiots.
ChooseHeaven 6 months ago
@ChooseHeaven Have a good life!
Misterdave5555 6 months ago
@ChooseHeaven "Science does not know anything"!!!!! That is the most ignorant statement I have seen on You Tube.
roac7777 6 months ago
@roac7777 I actually laughed out loud.
AltruisticSelfishnes 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ChooseHeaven You're an idiot. You aren't worth arguing with.
AltruisticSelfishnes 5 months ago
@ChooseHeaven trollol
Getlowend1812 4 months ago
@ChooseHeaven That is funny.
thesecondislander 6 months ago
@ChooseHeaven I see by your comment that you cannot be very bright. Don’t get lost in thought; you’d be in unfamiliar territory. Instead of writing nonsense about Richard Dawkins and we atheists you should save your breath, as you’ll need it to blow up your date. ~So think before you write and it will save you from setting aside this moment from humiliating yourself. I see you’ve set aside this special time to humiliate yourself
roac7777 5 months ago
@ChooseHeaven Methinks it is you who is the idiot. Do not get lost in thought you would be in unfamiliar territory. Instead of writing inane comments you should save your breath, you may need it to blow up your date.
roac7777 5 months ago
@roac7777
Pathetic nonsensicle comment..whooshh..its gone over my head because you know you have nothing meaningful to say...go back to you immoral way of life..indulge in your favourite pastime of incest..who is it today your mother?,,might as well since you dont believe in anything or believe there is any type of punishment out there.
ChooseHeaven 5 months ago
@ChooseHeaven Spoken like a true Christian, you cannot face the truth so you indulge in insults. Do not get lost in thought you would be in unfamiliar territory. I am glad you have chosen this time to write to me to humiliate yourself.
roac7777 5 months ago
@roac7777
Its YOU who is humiliating yourself dickhead using the same words in your comments..the reason USA is going downhill is because of Atheism and idiots like you representing it. Why dont you stand up for something at the moment you are putting up a very WEAK fight representing NOBODIES with no morals and filthy inclinations..Fuck off before i really start on you.
ChooseHeaven 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ChooseHeaven You keep repeating yourself. Tell you what, you stop telling lies about me and my fellow atheists and I will stop telling the truth about you and your religion.
roac7777 5 months ago
@ChooseHeaven Does your mom know you are on the internet?
2camjohn 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ChooseHeaven
"....using the same words in your comments."
He is repeating himself? I just read his comments, he is in fact not.
"USA is going downhill is because of Atheism"
No basis for this claim. Wild Slander.
" Why dont you stand up for something "
You said Science doesn't know anything, he said that is ridiculous. He just stood up for what he believes.
"representing NOBODIES with no morals and filthy inclinations."
You are the one flinging insults, insulting him constantly.
Obliza2 5 months ago
@ChooseHeaven: if there is one reason the USA is going downhill - it's because its population is born in to a culture that habitually claims singular greatness in its entirity throughout the world as an inherited entitlement.
The greatest divinely created and blessed nation. The best.
Greatness isn't to be aspired to, it isn't earned, it isn't aspired to and striven to be achieved through actions - it's assumed.
It's a cancer on honest self assessment growth and improvement. Its dogmadness
GraeHall 5 months ago
@GraeHall
Thats an excellent point.
I never reply to comments online, but you couldnt be more right.
I think theres a similar but opposite phenomenon going on here in Britain: we automatically assume (or would prefer) everything to be crap. Theres a real sneering contempt for honest earnestness, idealism and national pride, which manifests as a ridiculous twisted form of snobbery - we have contempt for anyone who genuinely succeeds, or even wants to succeed.
Bad attitudes as a default.
whataheapofpish 5 months ago
@GraeHall
Agreed
ChooseHeaven 5 months ago
@GraeHall
The problem with the culture in the united states that contributes most to its difficulties is a claim that capitalism in its 'purest' form. It has been attached to our basic emotions in that any alternative is construed as 'communism' or 'socialism,' and thus represents a threat to our own individual freedoms. However, as we have been seeing for a while now capitalism run 'rampant' without restriction is cannibalistic-we devour our own and weaken from within.
johnnyphoenix74 4 months ago in playlist More videos from UTbone04
@ChooseHeaven
You really are a biblekissing dipshit
sonykroket 4 months ago
@ChooseHeaven dude please ... wake up. youre scaring the shit out of me! im beginning to lose every hope that mankind's breeders arent dumb as a cheesetoast sandwich.
MrMaffen 1 month ago
theyve already done that human breeding thing, in China and Sovjet
unfad1ng 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
foxnews(.)com/opinion/2011/07/27/does-cross-belong-at-11-memorial-site Vote!
Reaperlastfm 6 months ago
The thing about the russian foxes is still going on. Many generations later. It is a sped up breeding of the sort we did to dogs. Essentialy as I understand it it is about prolonging/encouraging the naiveness of the animal because the behaviour of these bred foxes in their adulthood is the same as how they are when young. Basicaly making them survival idiots, because in nature real adulthood is required for survival.
KalleVarta 8 months ago
This guy speaks eloquently, yet has no answers.. I like how he goes against the grain..
Hodongji 8 months ago
@Hodongji Which guy? Has no answers? Everyone in this clip is serving their cause perfectly, Penn is being a decent radio host and Dawkins is giving the answers that a distinguished biologist on a mission to kill religion would give.
mehico33 7 months ago
I don't think Penn got the answer he was hoping for with the eugenics discussion. I think it probably is possible to selectively breed for smarter humans, but I don't think our current trend is making the species stupider. I think it's important to note that intelligence does not equal education, class or culture. That and the fact that intelligence has shown fairly low inheritability means I'm not concerned by this idea of "stupid people" breeding.
ShiftyMcSly 8 months ago
Eugenics wouldn't work because wisdom is dictated only by the individual in control of his own mind.
wingsofliberty437 8 months ago
If we outbreed the stupid people, how will congress survive?
cretinalert 8 months ago
That Russian silver fox experiment is still on-going. The reason that breeding for tameness lead to dog-like foxes is that the tameness came about by mean of neoteny. Dogs are just neotenous wolves!
JiveDadson 9 months ago
Here in America, welfare-recipients receive more free money if they have a lot of children. There's no such incentive to reproduce, for people who support themselves. So, yes, we select for disability, stupidity, and laziness.
And then we wonder why the country is full of zeroes. Duh.
TheNewCrankyWorkshop 9 months ago
When Richard mentions the idea of a nation who wants to win the Olympic High jump, it reminded me of something I read in "Before The Dawn" where they talked about how people from a certain area of Kenya have the fastest distance running records due to practices that involve people in that area needing to run. I think they were herding sheep or goats from other villages and running them back to their village. And through generations, speed became a natural genetic ability.
Moggiemcclee 9 months ago
I think another bigf reason, besides Hitler, that the idea of "human breeding" has fallen out of favor–or, more correctly, the reason the idea used to be more popular–is that people today are not dependent on domesticated animals the way they were 150 years ago. I can see how eugenics might have made a lot more sense to people who regularly compared the bloodlines of the horses that pulled their carriages and farm equipment. The idea of breeding was just a fact of life for people back then.
Guitcad1 9 months ago
lol at the 2 creationist nut-bags who disliked this...
mufcrulz 10 months ago
brb breeding wolves for tameness to see what happens..
then lions..
maybe komodo dragons or something else after that too.
Anonymous7349 11 months ago
3:44 Now that's what I call being objective, good point.
ExEverest10 1 year ago
The eugenics bit is sooooo true.
Because we have bread dogs to look a certain way but a side effect is that they can suffer from arthritis,seizures etc.
AtheismFTW1988 1 year ago
easy way to get rid of all the stupid people is to educate the stupid out of them.
Vermin298 1 year ago 20
@Vermin298 no, because stupidity is relative
octemberfury 3 months ago
@octemberfury no
Vermin298 3 months ago
@Vermin298 with a stick
panterasux22 3 months ago
@Vermin298
Completely agree.
In the grand scheme of things one or two more atheist kids aren't going to make a big difference. What will make a difference is society itself evolving to the point where truth is praised and myths are discarded.
With the atheist population growing faster than ever, it's nonsense to worry about who is having more children.
anonymous8261631 2 months ago
@Vermin298
Too bad that intelligence and education are two different things...
aimonaali 2 months ago 20
@aimonaali yeah, you use one to get the other.
Vermin298 2 months ago
Easy way to control the levels of stupid people in the population:
Remove all warning labels.
flapjackboy 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@flapjackboy "Easy way to control the levels of stupid people in the population:
Remove all warning labels."
We got another stupid one. Don't breed, bro.
"Easy way to control the levels of stupid people in the population:
Print clear, obvious warning labels with detailed explanations and a 'did you know' text box referencing the scientific understanding behind the ingredients"
Stupid people don't read.
Icemario87 10 months ago
All I could think of during the eugenics discussion was the movie Time Machine and how humans had bread themselves into their own predators.
hop208 1 year ago
Dawkins did say that Eugenics is possible, but I think from the tone of his voice he is completely against it. Like Penn it is quite disgusting and I don't think we should mess in that kind of science with people. Just for the reason Dawkins states that you could breed some desirable trait, but you would also end up with some trait you where not counting on that would be very undesirable.
jrwilson98 1 year ago
Great interview!!! thank you for posting it.
whatthehellimbored 1 year ago
I don't think people talk about outbreeding the idiot as a genetics way, but as with intelligent people, their offspring get better education without the prejudice and the superstition of their parent passed on them. When idiot and bigot reproduce more, they get more vote for their idea that they pass on to their children. Thus making idiotic policy.
moestietabarnak 1 year ago
On tame fox experiment:
watch?v=enrLSfxTqZ0
beavis6363 1 year ago
The problem is something bad this generation if it can reproduce it could become the start of the frontal lobes all over again.
maj1kninja07 1 year ago
evolutionary biology is fucking amazing and hearing dawkins talk about what he most knows is so deeply interesting!
SelfAware1 1 year ago
"Outbreed the stupid people." Jesus, I'm glad to hear someone else say they're disgusted by that.
coprographia 1 year ago 42
@coprographia I think most people are disgusted by that, and if they aren't, they know how much shit they'd get for it if they supported it. It's like one step removed from being racist. Maybe a lot of people do support it though, I may just be imagining this because, I promise, I actually find it disgusting, I'm not just saying that so I won't appear to be almost racist.
LanceDirk 1 year ago
@LanceDirk eugenics is even worse than racism
and classism in the U.S. is so pervasive that most of us don't even see it
coprographia 1 year ago
@coprographia I feel it's more insidious than racism because it can easily be presented in a way that is innocuous, or in a way that people seem to agree with it.
LanceDirk 1 year ago
@LanceDirk right. most people consider themselves part of some racial category or another but very few identify with "stupid people"
coprographia 1 year ago
@coprographia wuddnt you like to be born with a stroner body and a stronger mind tho? i kno we are who we are now, but wudnt you like ur kids to be stronger more intelligent human beings?
adzug 1 year ago
@adzug no
if I wanted stronger, smarter kids I'd try to inspire them to have those kinds of values
trying to breed people for specific traits will make them into livestock
coprographia 1 year ago
@coprographia yes that was part of the fox study tho. they gave aggressive fox kits to tame fox moms who raised them but they remained agressive implying nature was stronger than nurture. and i dont think it makes us livestock. see thing is we try to cure disease so if we can affect disease on a genetic scale it wud be a cure. so we cure your family line of being susceptable to brain anurisms. then we start breeding for stenghth , intelligence... i think it gets slippery
adzug 1 year ago
@coprographia
Why? I don’t understand why it’s so terrible. If stupid and intelligence has a genetic component which it obviously does it is plausible that it could work. I don’t see the harm in trying to increase the frequency of intelligence conducive genes in a population as long as people's liberties are not infringed upon in doing so. I am not sure how effective it will be and i wouldn’t both myself. But if others want to what is so terrible about it?
antonyneal 1 year ago
@antonyneal through what methods, then?
coprographia 1 year ago
@coprographia and to what ends?
coprographia 1 year ago
@coprographia
Smart people volunteering to donate large amounts of their eggs or sperm and large numbers of people choosing to use said eggs and sperm to have children. If you think my method is flawed, i don’t care. Just because i cannot think of a way of ending world poverty without force does not mean that there isn’t one and it defiantly doesn’t mean ending world poverty is evil. It probably means i lack the skills knowledge and resources.
antonyneal 1 year ago
@antonyneal you could cut your own dick and balls off
I wouldn't object to that
coprographia 1 year ago
@coprographia
Yeah, good idea smartie. You hate the idea of people trying to improve the gene pool even if they don’t hurt anyone in the process but like the idea of people mutilating themselves if they don’t agree with you. You’re so a righteous.
antonyneal 1 year ago
@antonyneal oh are you electing yourself as a designated breeder then
coprographia 1 year ago
@antonyneal "Just because i cannot think of a way of ending world poverty without force does not mean that there isn’t one and it defiantly doesn’t mean ending world poverty is evil"
I'm very extremely curious right now: explain a scenario under which "force" would "end world poverty"?
Icemario87 10 months ago
@coprographia There's the kind of people who think of themselves as highly intelligent and wish they could get laid despite the anti-intellectual American zeitgeist. But there's also the type that has seen actual statistics showing that religious people breed exponentially faster than non-believers, and that most people indoctrinated in childhood remain believers their whole life. In light of this undeniable FACT, some get nightmares about what the world will look like half a century from now.
nactan 1 year ago
@nactan you are so precociously full of shit
look, son. becoming an adult is all about learning to live up to your own ideals instead of expecting the rest of the world to conform to them.
so be a man
and rip your own stupid dick off
coprographia 1 year ago
@coprographia
Line 1: Possibly.
2 & 3: "Becoming an adult"? What does that mean?
4: I am biologically male.
5: Not until I understand your argument.
Reducto ad odium? :P It's interesting you assumed I'm in favor of eugenics even though all I've done is present two points of view, to which you responded like the classic internet tough guy. Well, tough guy, why don't you rip your own dick off and show me how it's done?
nactan 1 year ago 2
@nactan you are not even remotely worth taking that seriously you gross child
coprographia 1 year ago
@nactan Ignore coprographia. He thinks you're antonyneal.
Icemario87 10 months ago
@coprographia I think trying to "outbreed the stupid people" qualifies you for celibacy.
Like the foxes and the collies and others, if you breed for a desirable trait you're also breeding for several unexpected traits. And further, the bigger point is:
If you're too dumb to realize that the "stupid people" problem is actually a "stupid education system" problem, then you probably shouldn't be breeding a large flock.
In short: stupidity is not a genetic problem, stupid.
Icemario87 10 months ago
@Icemario87 damn straight
Nobody who really understands evolution flirts with eugenics, it's just a thin veneer of science spread over a lot of self-entitled classist or racist horseshit.
coprographia 10 months ago
I mean, call me cold-hearted if you want, but I'd rather see any deadbeat dad/mother made to have their reproductive organs removed than to see my taxes increased to subsidize their irresponsible behaviors..
jakematters 2 years ago
Eugenics practices by the Nazi party was arguably more about silencing race and political tendencies than inferior genetics. I'm not going to prevaricate about the bush.. Personal responsibility seems to be slipping away in modern America, and in that light, I do in fact support eugenics to a degree.
jakematters 2 years ago
@jakematters I liked Doug Stanhope's idea of "Incentive-based Eugenics" where we get undesirable people to castrate themselves by giving out white trash prizes n' stuff.
pyrix 1 year ago
@pyrix
"we get undesirable people to castrate themselves by giving out white trash prizes"
Well, what is Jackass and Backyard Wrestling?
imsuperhim 1 year ago
That eugenics discussion was very fascinating.
SockbatReplica 2 years ago 38
Yeah, nice to hear Dawkins admit that eugenics could actually work. Too many people dismiss it as pseudo-science, no doubt because of the nazi connection.
DavidLavery78 2 years ago
Well it's wishthinking.. Regardless though I found the discussion to be interesting I don't know what it is about eugenics but the subject for some reason manages to capture my fascination. I especially enjoyed that little thing he said about the russians who were breading foxes that ended up coming out looking like Collie's. That part is cool.
SockbatReplica 2 years ago
I've been saying the same for a long time, after researching it a few years ago. The Nazis definitely ruined eugenics for the 20th century, though in the 1930's you could say the epicentre of it was in the United States.
N.B.: the father of eugenics, Francis Galton, was Charles Darwin's cousin (Galton also did research about the occurence of genius in families...).
ytzuigt 2 years ago
@SockbatReplica My thoughts exactly on the 'taming of the fox' experiment
CrossCreed4800 5 months ago