@LoveAndGymnastics Sometimes the dismount is so well done, the rings are able to stop themselves from counter-forces on the way down.
Other than that, sometimes they do get wrapped around the frame, so the best way is just to poke it away with a stick until its free again! Then stop it with a hook.
there's 3 new move with the victorian .. it's called a rodriguez. it's a french guys named pedro rodriguez who invented those moves this guys is awesome.
They are not forbidden. They just don't get the same credit the used to. Now they are valued as two separate skills: front uprise + maltese or front uprise + inverted cross.
...you didn't happen to have competed in the IHSA state meet yesterday now did you? I was there and saw someone do a chechi on rings. It was the only chechi i've ever seen and it's sort of odd that we just talked about this trick a week ago.
Right. "Any" skill that swings up and backward past a vertical support to another skill is now two skills - so Kip Maltese is no longer an E (it's A + D), Kip Planche is no longer a D (it's A + C), Frontuprise inverted cross is no longer a D (it's A + C), etc. Kip cross is ok because it doesn't swing past vertical support.
Doctors once said the same thing of the four-minute mile too. Give gymnastics another decade and Victorians may well be as standard as malteses / swallows.
This is not possible because of the latissimus muscle absurd growth under the practise of the skill. Juri Chechi said that he stopped training it because of that (he wanted to perform on other events like pommel horse, which you cant do if you have large lats)
And if you're just a ring specialist who doesn't do other events, it's certainly possible.
Arguing about this isn't productive, because it's a difference in value-choice about impossibility. I retain the belief that advancements in training and understanding of muscle growth could enable a ring specialist to compete a good Victorian.
Actually, that's not quite right; a backward roll to maltese or a pull to maltese from back lever is an F, whereas a front uprise victorian is only an E (in my opinion it SHOULD be an F, though)
Rate the strength parts in terms of difficulty 1. Balandin I, 2 Balandin II, 3. Victorian 4. Maltese 5. Invert. Check out Dong Zhen(2001) here: =HrmjBBPqKhg He does the Balandin I in two presise steps. DIFFICULT!
The forst 3 are debatable. An inverted cross is definitely the easiest, a maltese being the second easiest, but honestly I'd guess the Balandins to be on about the same level of difficulty as a victorian. I say "guess" because I've never been close to strong enough to do any of those three, though on a ring machine a victorian is definitely the easiest of the remaining three (as in I can do a victorian on a ring machine and I can't do either of the balandins)
dude maltese is easier than inverted, i know because i can do them, the inverted not all the way down but i got the idea just in my opinion, and about the victorian.....yeah that is hard skill. do you do gymnastics?
I guess because i have good planches, and when I do the cross it hearts my biceps. I need to stop lifting hard weights. Where do you find the value of the skills?
schwalbe i think might be a maltese press to planche (looked like he was going to but vid got cut?)
a russian giant starts and ends in an inverted cross, not handstand.
pretty sure an o'neil is just a double back within the rings. i dont think it matters if its piked, tucked, or laid out. even yang wei does one but keeps pressure on the rings.
On the Russian giant, that just sounds like an inlocate. Maybe I don't understand THAT as well? Could you explain? I would appreciate it.
Mmm, no, a Guczoghy is a double back and I think it's still a Guczoghy if it's piked (only it's qualified as "piked Guczoghy" or "Guczoghy piked", whichever you prefer). An O'Neil from what I recall should be laid-out but I guess the guy here just does it a bit sloppy.
Yeah, neither can I. Maybe it's the pike part that makes it a Russian giant? Looks like we need to ask a coach who's familiar with all these things. :(
I looked much closer and did slight research. A Schwalbe is a maltese. Except it is the "real" name for it. Similar to a whip-it vs Honma.
And a russian giant is the same on rings as it is on high bar. Imagine a giant in the "skin the cat" position, if that makes sense (inlocated shoulders throughout the giant swing).
Not 100% but I'm pretty sure an O'Neil is a laid out Guczoghy. The video is seemingly right; the first back in most laid out doubles is usually hollowed through.
I thought the "real" name for a Maltese was Swallow or something like that. I never even heard of Schwalbe until now. I assume it was named after someone named Schwalbe?
I think I understand what you mean about the Russian giant. Sorta hard to picture in my mind though and the video isn't that clear.
Agreed on the O'Neil thing. I've seen better. The guy just did it sloppy. Seen the same with double lay-outs off the rings.
li ning 1 starts from a swing, li ning 2 starts from support, the li ning shown here is something in between. li ning 1 is B and li ning 2 is C. when preformed to cross they're respectivly C and D.
I talked with Mr. Nakayama several years ago.
He showed the gold medal proudly.
His lesson was very pleasant.
japanesedunkmania 2 months ago
How do they get the rings to stop flying around after a gymnast dismounts and it's someone else's turn?
LoveAndGymnastics 4 months ago
@LoveAndGymnastics Sometimes the dismount is so well done, the rings are able to stop themselves from counter-forces on the way down.
Other than that, sometimes they do get wrapped around the frame, so the best way is just to poke it away with a stick until its free again! Then stop it with a hook.
oknowiamdead 3 months ago
Guczoghy - Nemov and Saito (i guess), about the other one I'm not shure...
Carmona, Van Gelder, Mollinari and Rodrigues are missing
AeffchenSkill 4 months ago
please why music why ? WHY ? good shoots doh
weedisallineed1 6 months ago
ONeil - Jesus Carballo
igorgymn1 9 months ago
whats the name of the people who does guzoghy or the o'neill in this video.
lilsmithyg5 9 months ago
fantastic video
lilsmithyg5 9 months ago
Hello! I upload a video of the Molinari new element! It's a kip to cross to V sit.. Put this exercice in your video! Thanks
89paulita89 1 year ago
layed out yamawalki**
flipkid2233 1 year ago
layed out tkatchev?
flipkid2233 1 year ago
2:48 is just beyond.
Thehamez 1 year ago
Where's the van Gelder?
Olivier89 1 year ago
NO DOUBT...VICTORIAN IS THE BEST and the O'Neill
WeaponX0187 1 year ago
YAMAWAKI!!!!
WeaponX0187 1 year ago
Isnt that a maltese not a schwalbe
ksuhrud 2 years ago
the body is higher in a maltese.
Genomatekk 2 years ago
That Bhavsar is crazy. Goinig against the motion you are going and that too on rings.
ksuhrud 2 years ago
what's the hardest trick you can perform on the rings?
brokebackcowboy3 2 years ago
I think sit's a baladin 2
From still hang pull to inverted cross
Rasvatri 2 years ago
@brokebackcowboy3 It's Balandin II and Victorian for sure. Those require nasty strength.
egorych 2 years ago
there's 3 new move with the victorian .. it's called a rodriguez. it's a french guys named pedro rodriguez who invented those moves this guys is awesome.
syzlox 2 years ago
@syzlox his name is Danny rodriguez, not perdo.
joshuachancuevas 1 year ago
@joshuachancuevas Danny Pinheiro Rodrigues sorry ! i though his middle name was pedro
syzlox 1 year ago
@syzlox Danny Pinheiro Rodrigues sorry ! i though his middle name was pedro
syzlox 1 year ago
how do they flip while holding on to the rings and not make the rings twisted??
sorry, i'm a girl gymnast so i don't really know
nastrocksxd18 2 years ago
There are ball bearings on the top so when we flip the motion is tranferred all the way to the top and the cables are not twisted
ksuhrud 2 years ago
oh...okay
thanks a lot!
nastrocksxd18 2 years ago
awesome video, crappy music.
rambo5551 2 years ago
These take a crazy a amount of strength- respect to all the athletes.
streetmirage 2 years ago 5
Tampakos 1 and 2 are forbidden elements
Rasvatri 2 years ago
wonder why there not in the code anymore....
createwithkathy 2 years ago
FIG decided that, i don't know why either
Rasvatri 2 years ago
why? if u look at the ohio state video the first guy does tampakos 2
xSiLeNtKiLax 2 years ago
Because they are contra swing elements and all contra swing elements are removed from the FIG-code
Rasvatri 2 years ago
even Bhavsar
ksuhrud 2 years ago
They are not forbidden. They just don't get the same credit the used to. Now they are valued as two separate skills: front uprise + maltese or front uprise + inverted cross.
DrAlexisOlson 2 years ago
Indeed
Rasvatri 2 years ago
does any body know the value of the Chechi i want put it in my routine
H2SSelly 2 years ago
FIG B
I think its also a B in IHSA.
Hooligan8200 2 years ago
thx i looked in the IHSA rule book and it didnt list it. i dont need any more Bs but its a cool trick to stand out with for a mount thx
H2SSelly 2 years ago
...you didn't happen to have competed in the IHSA state meet yesterday now did you? I was there and saw someone do a chechi on rings. It was the only chechi i've ever seen and it's sort of odd that we just talked about this trick a week ago.
Hooligan8200 2 years ago
lmao! yeah! it was the worst meet of my life too n gave me a shit tone fo swing n i dislocated my shoulder/elbow on the 1st trick! wooooot!
H2SSelly 2 years ago
haha wow thats insane, small world eh?
Your routine didn't look too bad, you just sorta looked tired (or injured from your first trick). But hey you had a chechi in there!
Hooligan8200 2 years ago
Comment removed
H2SSelly 2 years ago
dude, at 2:43, thats a Rodrigues 1.
createwithkathy 2 years ago
fucking shit, the last one after the victorian was crazy!!!
MicrosoftIndesign 2 years ago
And Tampakos either
Rasvatri 2 years ago
Right. "Any" skill that swings up and backward past a vertical support to another skill is now two skills - so Kip Maltese is no longer an E (it's A + D), Kip Planche is no longer a D (it's A + C), Frontuprise inverted cross is no longer a D (it's A + C), etc. Kip cross is ok because it doesn't swing past vertical support.
dd8yf 2 years ago
In the new FIG-code, cosollany isn't an element anymore
Rasvatri 2 years ago
HOLY SHIT AT 2:50 IS THE ONLY GOOD VICTORIAN ON YOUTUBE. Victorian is by far the hardest skill
crazybuffkid 2 years ago
Nobody does a good victorian because its against nature.
Rasvatri 2 years ago
Doctors once said the same thing of the four-minute mile too. Give gymnastics another decade and Victorians may well be as standard as malteses / swallows.
dd8yf 2 years ago
This is not possible because of the latissimus muscle absurd growth under the practise of the skill. Juri Chechi said that he stopped training it because of that (he wanted to perform on other events like pommel horse, which you cant do if you have large lats)
Fizniperal 2 years ago
And if you're just a ring specialist who doesn't do other events, it's certainly possible.
Arguing about this isn't productive, because it's a difference in value-choice about impossibility. I retain the belief that advancements in training and understanding of muscle growth could enable a ring specialist to compete a good Victorian.
dd8yf 2 years ago
True, higher than the others I've uploaded. I think that was the first time ever Rodrigues did it.
Fizniperal 2 years ago
no i have a victorian on my favorites, i am working on that skill and hopefully upload it soon
MicrosoftIndesign 2 years ago
great song, great music
Sameronei 2 years ago
there aren't even 10 ppl on earth who can do Victorian i think...it's fucking hard. you need fucking strong lats
ziga112 3 years ago
victorian is the hardest skill on rings no question
flipkid2233 3 years ago
I'm a female gymnast and know next to nothing about men's gymnastics, but what is the most difficult element on rings?
xllamasrhawtx 3 years ago
stength wise - I'd say a Victorian. skill ("trick") wise - it would depend.
Italirican08 3 years ago
The Rodrigues (front uprise to Victorian) is more difficult.
Back lever pull to Maltese also worth the same as the Rodrigues. (Whether or not it is harder is debatable.)
DrAlexisOlson 3 years ago
Actually, that's not quite right; a backward roll to maltese or a pull to maltese from back lever is an F, whereas a front uprise victorian is only an E (in my opinion it SHOULD be an F, though)
GeoffTaucer 2 years ago
Check the code again. A front uprise victorian (Rodrigues) is indeed an F.
DrAlexisOlson 2 years ago 2
My mistake; I was thinking of the other two Rodrigues elements.
GeoffTaucer 2 years ago 2
Wasn't the olympic cross named after someone?
Rate the strength parts in terms of difficulty 1. Balandin I, 2 Balandin II, 3. Victorian 4. Maltese 5. Invert. Check out Dong Zhen(2001) here: =HrmjBBPqKhg He does the Balandin I in two presise steps. DIFFICULT!
johnseeley 3 years ago
The forst 3 are debatable. An inverted cross is definitely the easiest, a maltese being the second easiest, but honestly I'd guess the Balandins to be on about the same level of difficulty as a victorian. I say "guess" because I've never been close to strong enough to do any of those three, though on a ring machine a victorian is definitely the easiest of the remaining three (as in I can do a victorian on a ring machine and I can't do either of the balandins)
GeoffTaucer 2 years ago
dude maltese is easier than inverted, i know because i can do them, the inverted not all the way down but i got the idea just in my opinion, and about the victorian.....yeah that is hard skill. do you do gymnastics?
MicrosoftIndesign 2 years ago
I've always found an inverted cross to be much easier than a maltese -- in fact, I've found it to be easier than a cross or streaight-body planche.
GeoffTaucer 2 years ago
I guess because i have good planches, and when I do the cross it hearts my biceps. I need to stop lifting hard weights. Where do you find the value of the skills?
MicrosoftIndesign 2 years ago
You can download the code of points from the FIG website.
GeoffTaucer 2 years ago
deltchev and jotchev are bulgarian w00t rep
playman9111 3 years ago
Pretty sure deltchev was done in the 1980 olympics by russia
oknowiamdead 3 years ago
im pretty sure you're wrong buddy, check it out en.wikipedia(dot)org/wiki/Stoyan_Deltchev
playman9111 3 years ago
Deltchev wins gold on HB and bronze in all around in 1980
simsmims 3 years ago
Holy monkey. Balandin is amazing.
GeoffTaucer 3 years ago
Jeeeeeez! Unreal.
alepeccia 3 years ago
During the Balandin 1, a guy stands up making it a weird optical illusion. Very neat move however.
Hooligan8200 3 years ago
Is a Schawlbe just a Maltese?
What's the difference between Li Ning 1 and 2?
What exactly is a Russian giant? It looks just like a front giant on rings.
Is an O'Neil supposed to be a double lay-out? Looked more piked here.
kommisar 3 years ago
schwalbe i think might be a maltese press to planche (looked like he was going to but vid got cut?)
a russian giant starts and ends in an inverted cross, not handstand.
pretty sure an o'neil is just a double back within the rings. i dont think it matters if its piked, tucked, or laid out. even yang wei does one but keeps pressure on the rings.
jparkdzg 3 years ago
No idea on that Schwalbe still.
On the Russian giant, that just sounds like an inlocate. Maybe I don't understand THAT as well? Could you explain? I would appreciate it.
Mmm, no, a Guczoghy is a double back and I think it's still a Guczoghy if it's piked (only it's qualified as "piked Guczoghy" or "Guczoghy piked", whichever you prefer). An O'Neil from what I recall should be laid-out but I guess the guy here just does it a bit sloppy.
kommisar 3 years ago
Then i have no idea. initially i thought a russian giant was the same as on hb, but cant really tell by the video.
jparkdzg 3 years ago
Yeah, neither can I. Maybe it's the pike part that makes it a Russian giant? Looks like we need to ask a coach who's familiar with all these things. :(
kommisar 3 years ago
I looked much closer and did slight research. A Schwalbe is a maltese. Except it is the "real" name for it. Similar to a whip-it vs Honma.
And a russian giant is the same on rings as it is on high bar. Imagine a giant in the "skin the cat" position, if that makes sense (inlocated shoulders throughout the giant swing).
Not 100% but I'm pretty sure an O'Neil is a laid out Guczoghy. The video is seemingly right; the first back in most laid out doubles is usually hollowed through.
jparkdzg 3 years ago
I thought the "real" name for a Maltese was Swallow or something like that. I never even heard of Schwalbe until now. I assume it was named after someone named Schwalbe?
I think I understand what you mean about the Russian giant. Sorta hard to picture in my mind though and the video isn't that clear.
Agreed on the O'Neil thing. I've seen better. The guy just did it sloppy. Seen the same with double lay-outs off the rings.
kommisar 3 years ago
o'neil is jsut stretched
tsukbelle 3 years ago
li ning 1 starts from a swing, li ning 2 starts from support, the li ning shown here is something in between. li ning 1 is B and li ning 2 is C. when preformed to cross they're respectivly C and D.
Nilsnqe 3 years ago
Hey that's my rope routine music?
akawhippy 3 years ago
who does that victorian?
gymnova93 4 years ago
i believe that that is danny rodrigues, or something like that. i think he is from france
LFDYGymnast 4 years ago
who is the guy doing Victorian
klaustrogymn 4 years ago
i was always terrible at rings... these men are gods.
prepster845 4 years ago
The victorian and the balandin look impossible!!!!
natcomber13 4 years ago