The quality is sure better than on my cell-phone. I have them both and I would opt for it if apple creates a cellphone with this kind (or a little bit better quality video recording). I know, iPhone, but I don't like touch screen phones. Call me old fashioned, but I'd rather have keys under my fingers so I could feel them (not to mention that touch screen phones are "so useful for blind, or visually impaired people")
3GS is far better. Anyway this is a real good camera for a nano that is so thin. Can't wait to see how apple develops this in the future (2010 iPod event here we come).
It lacks manual controls, like changing the shutter speed and aperture. Plus I'm seeing some jello effect. Meh, I'll stick with my VDSLR.. Apple fail.
wow good video quality. thinking of buying one.
whatev53 2 years ago
thats pretty fucin beast!!:)
angelsbaseball714 2 years ago
it doesn't record at 16:9..pointless
vitto 2 years ago
why would it?.. thats just asking for too much lol
KingSiddhartha 2 years ago
nice finger ^^
polozura 2 years ago
I have them both, I meant, nano and the classic.
ViD3R 2 years ago
The quality is sure better than on my cell-phone. I have them both and I would opt for it if apple creates a cellphone with this kind (or a little bit better quality video recording). I know, iPhone, but I don't like touch screen phones. Call me old fashioned, but I'd rather have keys under my fingers so I could feel them (not to mention that touch screen phones are "so useful for blind, or visually impaired people")
ViD3R 2 years ago
omg where is so good weather?:o
cookiex92 2 years ago
San Francisco at the peirs, i live here so I recognize it right away.
Daniel1000rr 2 years ago
Yeah it's near Pier 39 I think, I've been their 2 years ago and I still recognized it instantly. It's a nice city.
dechileen 2 years ago
For a nano that's some pretty damm good quality
zeroalmost 2 years ago 2
i agree i am surprised!
geekaleek 2 years ago
looks better than the cycorder on my 3g lol
Kime0 2 years ago
ok... GOODBYE GIZMODO, FFING SPAM!
server4uorg 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Apple products..for gays & fat chicks
mopore 2 years ago
looks about the same as the 3GS quality. nice.
IllManneredPrince 2 years ago
3GS is far better. Anyway this is a real good camera for a nano that is so thin. Can't wait to see how apple develops this in the future (2010 iPod event here we come).
AngelChildxxx 2 years ago
Lol Fishermans wharf
XXdarktheifXX 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Apple products...for gays & fat chicks
mopore 2 years ago
well...your a fat gay chick :P
timstarockz 2 years ago
correction...gay fat chick
i have a pink nano w/ hello kitty stickers on it
mopore 2 years ago
...cool...*"gay fat chick"
timstarockz 2 years ago
probably you look at the mirror and say: ehi, I want an iPhone.
AngelChildxxx 2 years ago
Damn! That's better than i thought it would be.
xdrcft56 2 years ago 2
It's good for just youtube videos. This is in no way high quality.
evolutiotology 2 years ago
It lacks manual controls, like changing the shutter speed and aperture. Plus I'm seeing some jello effect. Meh, I'll stick with my VDSLR.. Apple fail.
peacefulpony 2 years ago
lol you're joking right?
if so...good one :]
if not...WOW.
USERX15 2 years ago
is that for the nano??!! is it tha nanos video camera?? if it is then its really high quality!!!!!!!!!!!
bmd900 2 years ago
nice
delgadilloaaron 2 years ago