Its funny seeing the Supra fans and NSX fans going at it. Both sides won't agree on which car is better no matter evidence etc nor should they. At the end of the day its all down to what you personally like, driver skill and modifications. No one car is better than another. Ive heard people say that the stock porsche is unbeatable against other stock cars. Kinda true - a stock $90000 porsche would beat a stock $20000 skyline just like a stock veyron would beat a stock porsche.
I have a NSX. Buddy had to spend a shit load to go that fast in the nsx. Cause a stock nsx can only support 450 to the wheels before the motor needs beefing up.
Umm. Power to weight ratio plays a huge roll in this race. And to the dude who said pick up a T88. Get with the times. Greddy and HKS are behind the times in turbo technology.
my 2 favourite japanese super cars...*thinks very hard* i believe am a little more on the supra side..the supra owner shod try a t88 turbo 4 a rematch
@Mr.Juice , you're an idiot. Its not about how much boost youre pushing.. Its about how much air you move.. Go read some books or something.. Stay away from forced induction... You dont know wtf youre talking about.
honestly i blame it on the supra driver for runing 15 pounds on a fucking supra that nsx is lucky thou if he got that same car on 35+ pounds it would be a hole different outcome lemme tell you that!!!
it would be too dangerous if Honda would manufacture turbo fro regualr passenger cars. let alone well all might think honda doesnt have the technology to do that. Turbo + Aluminum Chassis + Mid Engine + crazy understeer, its just basically a death trap waiting to happen. but them nsx can move.
@V10Killer2JayZee hondas attitude is always toward to NA engine and it had been that way since they start making race engines. they make turbo v6 for touring competition and v8 for f1 and i wish they release those engines in their production car.
i just cant stand how other ppl talk about hondas, cmon just take a look at k20, f22s, i dont care how many cylynders its missing i dont care which set of wheels its driven by.....hondas always take others out in engine performance and engineering
@mrblockboii: Agree with you here. I ran across a RSX Type S with a K24 swap, all motor and the guy made 302whp. If he decides to go boost too, EVEN JUST ON LOW BOOST like at about 7 PSI, he has himself a monster!
@mrblockboii lets not forget the b series! not quite as powerful as an f22c or k20, but in its time it was running with american made v8s! and thats 90's technology!
@mrblockboii couldn't agree with you more man, honda is all about n/a. I think the main reason is simply because of reliability, less = fewer problems. Though it would be nice to see honda go turbo with some of their sport models like the si, because i know they have a couple cars that are turbo (rdx i believe). But back on point, its quite amazing what honda has accomplished without the use of force induction, the k20 and f22 being great examples.
if supra or skyline owners are being bigger dicks than usual, the nsx will take care of the problem. the nsx seems to be the only car to piss them off.
@Type2Vtec Well I'll look past the fact you have vtec in your name.....but if you're trying to tell everyone here an NSX has near the potential as a supra in straight line races. Please go end yourself.
Regardless what anyone can say. The NSX is a car that define Japenese motoring, then you have the Skyline and the Supra. People sleep on the NSX cause its a cheap ferrari. Work and a fine tune and it over.
nice pull by the nsx....lets face it people, the nsx won, we can always go into "what if"..is the supra capable of more power, hell yeah. at 16psi, the supra is barely running past stock boost of the stock twins. the nsx is a high comp motor, so at 15psi, its making a lot more power. use that same 67mm turbo and run it up to 25psi and see how the tables turn drastically. also i doubt the nsx can run too much more boost without a costly build
Give the NSX it's due props. I have a single turbo supra myself, but I love NSX's also. Very unique hand built car and rare to see on the streets. My friend has a NSX turbo that smokes damn near everything on the streets out here in the California bay area.
@meifert2 if chuck is a f1/monster truck then steven seagul has gotta be a couple of bugatti veyrons combined. thats how indestructably powerfully awesome steven is.
I know people are gonna bitch at this, but i dont like the 2JZ-GTE that much, its a turbo 6 cyl putting down about 320hp, and the C-series is an NA V6 producing roughly 295hp. now you tell me which is the better engine.
@BYCURE213 You're retarded. The 2JZ was designed with a heavy duty iron block and low-compression pistons specifically for forced induction. FI motors like low-comp as it aids in preventing predetonation.. but i doubt you even know what that is.
Your argument would be like saying "NSXs suck because they need high compression, high rpms, and variable timing to get power". Slap some low comp pistons into that C30 and shift at 7k rpm and let me know how fast your vtak wunder engine is dumbass..
@jerryatrix9no, but like the tard you are, youd build an NA engine with low comp pistons and low revs. NA engines need High comp, high revs. just because the pistons in a 2JZ are low comp doesnt mean its running low comp because you still have that turbo shoving air into the cyls creating more compression. but hey, i dont know anything about cars i just base my whole life around them and have built some you could only wish to stand next to.
@BYCURE213 Dumbass, learn to read better. I am aware there is higher compression in a FI engine when under load, otherwise I would'nt have already said the reason for the low-comp pistons was to help prevent detonation. My whole comment was based towards that idiot kid who said the C30 was superior because it made more power in N/A form than the 2JZ. My point was that his argument is idiotic, because a 2JZ is designed for FI to attain higher CFMs, whereas an NSX uses high comp and high revs.
WOW you supra owners are really pissed off lol although i am a proud supra owner myself i respect the nsx since u hardly ever see them let alone modded to this extent
slotank, scienceofspeed has their 3.8L stroker kit for nsx. don't get me wrong. both vehicles are engineering marvels, but the nsx was built to track race, not drag. oh yeah! stock vs stock, the nsx spanks the supra.
yet again honda beats toyota in something lol but we should of know theres really not that many cars that are fucking with the NSX those things are no jokess
@noobwithanrs well imagine if that nsx was single turbo gt47, yall need 2 stop comparin supras nd skylines 2 civics nsx ob boost is wayyyyyy better than skylines nd supras
@noobwithanrs yeah definitely a supra with a gt47-88 would kill it but the nsx would beat it on the track where there are apex, corkscrews and wat not.
@noobwithanrs If this NSX is really equipped with a TT then the performance of the engine should be equel to that of a Supra TT. A single Turbo isn´t playing in the same leage as a TT. Even if the Turbo would be bigger, as long a they run the same boost the twin is taking the win.
@noobwithanrs im sorry did you not see that yankin dat jus went down come on i would do either car if i had the money but prefer nsx but still woulda,coulda,shoulda no lie dat was a ass beatin no matter what
@noobwithanrs I would argue that the NSX has better straight line traction than the supra, and thus the power gets better on the wheels on NSX than on supra
@noobwithanrs LOL agreed, the supra would dominate the nsx on a drag race but when it comes to the track with winding roads apex and hair pins, the nsx would dominate the supra. with its mid engine platform, lightness and a high revving engine.
@Kuriousgorge87 not to mention that NSX have a better handling (plus the better stock engine, as you said), as Honda seems to have issues in improving it for an eventual new version.
the supra is easier to make faster cheaper..........400whp with just bolt ons an a couple of them run in the ten sec range with stock turbos......but the nsx is a beat on the cuircut
sure the supra is not as expensive as a nsx but its certainly not a first time buyers car........320hp in stock form is not really recomended for new drivers
A 500-550rwhp NSX will trap out at 130-135. The engine must be modded - new pistons arp studs to get pass 400-450rwhp. With the mild mods you can get to 600rwhp. You can push it to 650rwhp but third gear is a weak link at this power level. Many track turbo NSXs run around the 500-550 range. The FactorX time attack car runs in the 750rwhp range and has many track records and won the unlimited class this year. Power is not everything --- they detuned from 900-1000rwhp.
when fully modded to my tastes... i'd rather have the nsx. it's got more potential. but also cost WAY more to mod than the supra.
to get a baseline turbo nsx, you're spending atleast $10k worth in mods to only get 400'ish hp. for the supra, that can easily be done with bolt-ons on stock twins. that's why many opt to go supra. and you don't have to start thinking about building the 2jz until you're past 700hp. nsx stock engines give out around 500hp is the general concensus
this is strange. Stock the NSX newest model has hp of 290 and the supra has hp or 320. That's if the things were stock. I looked it up at Carpoint(dot)com. I am assuming who had the NSX spent more money under the hood.
The NSX might have lesser power than the Supra but it is around 800-1000 lighter than the Supra. That's quite a lot of baggage to haul compare to a NSX. Plus NSX gets better traction because it is a mid engine and there is also less power loss to the wheel compare to the Supra. UPs to the NSX because I owned two of them but I take nothing away from the Supra because with stock bottom end the 2JZ-GTE and handle up to 1000HP. The CA30 and 32 certainly can't do that with stock bottoms end.
I have a supra and its a head roller. But I love the NSX, i just read the history and information about the car and im eager to have one. How much did you pay for your nsx and how much you invested on it?
i dunno why people seem to think the supra is heavy as a truck lol.....mine weighed in at 1490ish kg which is around 3278 pounds so around 500 pounds heavier then the lightest nsx
@slotank 500 pounds is quite a lot in sports car and car racing world. Try loading 500 pounds of bricks on some car, I am pretty sure it will slow it down significantly.
Everyone has their views, but stock vs stock NSX-R rocks the Supra. Supra better drag car, but downside its heavy. NSX is a really well balanced chassis suitable for circuits. It does lack power because it was a car designed back in 1990 and back then 280hp was enough HP. From 1990 to 2005 the car has basically stayed unchanged. Remember the NSX design is REALLY OLD. The engine design is REALLY OLD. First production Variable Valve Timing engine. Besides NSX looks way better then Supra :D
@c312eal I don' think "REALLY OLD" would be the choice right words to describe the NSX engine. It is the first engine that has dual variable valve timing (intake and exhaust) which is still being used today. OVER-ENGINEERED maybe - the last generation 3.2 L engine (290 HP) even has titanium connecting rods. These engines were designed with reliability as the top priority.
@ating555 The engine was designed in the 80s. Thats 20 years ago. Pretty old if you ask me. All of the NSX engines the C32B and the 3.0L C30A had titanium connecting rods. Yes you are right at with reliability but you forgot to mention, RELIABILITY at high end performance. The nsx redlines at 8000rpm but it can reliably rev to 9000rpm. It is over engineered. An engine way ahead of its time. Thats why its hard to tune. The cylinders are coated with titanum or something to help cooling.
I don't agree. I hear they're a pain in the ass to modify. You can make any car fast. People who race with them complain about lack of power vs. other modified. You'd have to put a lot of money in to it.
But maybe that's just my preference of the supra over NSX any day.
@damstr How wrong are you. Japanese car makers and car people said that the NSX was the God of JDM until the R35. The stock NA2 NSX-R runs faster than the R34 on the 1/4 mile. Lets not even talk about cornering between the R34 vs the NSX. Get your facts straight. Every professional racer in japan will tell you that the NSX is God of JDM and is faster/has more potential than the R34. Fat ass 1500kg R34. PSSSSSH
I think what he was trying to say was a sequential twin turbo setup. IE One Small Turbo, One Big Turbo. Essentially what happens is the small turbo builds boost quicker to put the second turbo, the bigger one into full boost quicker.
agreed to a single turbo would make it faster. but the turbo lag sucks ass.. when your gear up to 4th gear, the second turbo kicks in and thus hurting your back in the seat... but its easier for a twin turbo to spool up faster making quicker shifts =D .. thats if your a pro driver.. The other day i was in the passenger seat of a tt 92 supra and a 2008 M3 was tailing us hard.. when the second turbo kicked in the supra was out. when we came to stop light he said " fuck that's a fast car"
yeah. the second turbo kicks in.. the car's computer tells it to spool up thus preventing turbo lag.. let me simple it up. when you start the drive the car the first trubo is already spooling up simontaneously(sorry for bad spelling) as the second turbo starts to spool up making it easier for the car to breathe(add a blow off valve) and this makes the fuel/air ratio greater.. there will also be less compression with a twin turbo then a single. a proud owner of a1997 15th anniversary supra T top
ahhh a supra owner....i would be fucking honored to have one haha. its been my favorite car for 3 years and its my dreaaaaam before i die (or until the zombies come :P) to get one. i need a supra. i am obsessed.
Sure you can, most are single though...including this one. IT IS NOT A TWIN! The motor is also fully built by Factor X and the turbo setup is FX. It would take a 800hp supra to even stand a chance against this NSX. Weight/engine configuration and gearing give the NSX a huge advantage.
LISTEN UP!!!! The NSX is a SINGLE TURBO FactorX built motor and T67 turbo. It is making 500whp. It is a fully built engine running 9.0/1 compression. It is not stock! It will take AT LEAST a 650+hp supra to win this race. Weight and engine configuration are what make the difference. Transversely mounted VS longitudinally mounted....30% VS 15% drivetraine losses. Getting the power to the wheels is the diffenence here!
yup i think your right its the aem civic but look up titan celica it runs a 2jzgte an runs 6.4 at its best which makes it the fastest import at the drag strip
type in titan celica an titan scion, rayglass celica an gas motor sports celica all running 6s, so theres more then one theres more like more then 4 or 5 of these 2jz powered cars doing 6s down the qaurter mile, fastest being in the 6.4s
here's the way I see it:
Turbo Camaro (SS) > Turbo NSX > Turbo Supra
no camaro in the vid though, but I saw the same NSX get walked by a Camaro
not dissing the all-aluminum NSX, its the only decent jap car (still no match for v8 tho.)
the rest are just overrated big time
gmpushrodpower 1 week ago
@gmpushrodpower Skyline GT-R R34 with higher boost will beat all three of those ;) And most v8's
cam420000 5 days ago
Its funny seeing the Supra fans and NSX fans going at it. Both sides won't agree on which car is better no matter evidence etc nor should they. At the end of the day its all down to what you personally like, driver skill and modifications. No one car is better than another. Ive heard people say that the stock porsche is unbeatable against other stock cars. Kinda true - a stock $90000 porsche would beat a stock $20000 skyline just like a stock veyron would beat a stock porsche.
TheKamakazipenguin 1 week ago
Priceless reaction!!!! LOLOL!!!
ranmas2004 1 month ago
Horsepower difference?
ThePh03niXSun 1 month ago
NSX 4 LYFE!!!!!
Fuck Supras. Fuck Toyota.
primalfear312 1 month ago
ns-sex
nuocmat 1 month ago
nsx= badass
supra= overrated piece of shit
chuckmekere 2 months ago
NSX and SKyline FTW. Not SUpra
chuckmekere 3 months ago
Fuck.. Supras, silvias, mustang and all the the low shit.. Honda world (NSX)
gvcivico4ever 3 months ago 4
Although mods are more expensive for the NSX, a clean 91-93 NSX with not too high of mileage costs less nowadays, which kinda makes up for it.
chuckmekere 3 months ago
Simple physics (that the Supra fans have forgotten):
Mid engine 2-seater, same displacement, twin-turbo & lighter= FASTER
Supras are overrated. NSX > Supra.
chuckmekere 3 months ago
I have a NSX. Buddy had to spend a shit load to go that fast in the nsx. Cause a stock nsx can only support 450 to the wheels before the motor needs beefing up.
tayman1975 3 months ago
Hahahaaa Supra got shitted on..!
yoassgoinhateme 4 months ago
Honda the power of dreams.
503JDMwarrior 4 months ago
The CA30 is a supercar engine peroid !!
AlliGDigital 4 months ago
if you wanna race in a honda make sure its an NSX Period !
Hell with the other models .. XD
IVEMER 5 months ago
Umm. Power to weight ratio plays a huge roll in this race. And to the dude who said pick up a T88. Get with the times. Greddy and HKS are behind the times in turbo technology.
SinisterSC 6 months ago
I've never seen a Supra get walked like that, let alone for the driver to just let off 2 seconds into the race. That NSX is truly insane.
HeyMan096 6 months ago
"geezus christ!... Hoollyyy fuck!". LMAO
J30A1TypeR 6 months ago
my 2 favourite japanese super cars...*thinks very hard* i believe am a little more on the supra side..the supra owner shod try a t88 turbo 4 a rematch
TrionJuggernaut 6 months ago
Comment removed
TrionJuggernaut 6 months ago
@Mr.Juice , you're an idiot. Its not about how much boost youre pushing.. Its about how much air you move.. Go read some books or something.. Stay away from forced induction... You dont know wtf youre talking about.
240WRsXti 7 months ago
man both my favrite cars supras nd nsx's...gotta love that vtec tho!!!!!
jon1ramirez994 7 months ago
his vtec kicked in HARD yo
m6205 7 months ago
The nsx is only on 15psi and the supra is on 16psi... NSX FTW!
J30A1TypeR 7 months ago
honestly i blame it on the supra driver for runing 15 pounds on a fucking supra that nsx is lucky thou if he got that same car on 35+ pounds it would be a hole different outcome lemme tell you that!!!
MrJuice105 7 months ago
it would be too dangerous if Honda would manufacture turbo fro regualr passenger cars. let alone well all might think honda doesnt have the technology to do that. Turbo + Aluminum Chassis + Mid Engine + crazy understeer, its just basically a death trap waiting to happen. but them nsx can move.
V10Killer2JayZee 8 months ago
@V10Killer2JayZee hondas attitude is always toward to NA engine and it had been that way since they start making race engines. they make turbo v6 for touring competition and v8 for f1 and i wish they release those engines in their production car.
i just cant stand how other ppl talk about hondas, cmon just take a look at k20, f22s, i dont care how many cylynders its missing i dont care which set of wheels its driven by.....hondas always take others out in engine performance and engineering
mrblockboii 7 months ago 15
@mrblockboii: Agree with you here. I ran across a RSX Type S with a K24 swap, all motor and the guy made 302whp. If he decides to go boost too, EVEN JUST ON LOW BOOST like at about 7 PSI, he has himself a monster!
LAKid17 3 months ago
@mrblockboii lets not forget the b series! not quite as powerful as an f22c or k20, but in its time it was running with american made v8s! and thats 90's technology!
arcticmonkey487 3 months ago
@mrblockboii couldn't agree with you more man, honda is all about n/a. I think the main reason is simply because of reliability, less = fewer problems. Though it would be nice to see honda go turbo with some of their sport models like the si, because i know they have a couple cars that are turbo (rdx i believe). But back on point, its quite amazing what honda has accomplished without the use of force induction, the k20 and f22 being great examples.
ZerOArtGFX 2 months ago
@Marshmallowrex dont be mad because i got 14 thumbs ups.
noobwithanrs 9 months ago
do not mess with an NSX hahaha acura for life
CrzyKid48 10 months ago
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHA
jacked080 10 months ago
yea at 15psi he easly has 650hp it wouldnt matter if supra was runnin a t88 nsx is just 2 light weight
expantha 11 months ago 2
@expantha Nah not from a t67 he should be somewhere around 500hp in the supra.
nitrousboy0311 3 months ago
geez u can just hear the lopey idle on the nsx, cammed as fuck!
AsmodiusMKII 11 months ago
MY FAVORITE VIDEO OF ALL TIME HAHAHA JESUS CHRIST.......!!!!!!!!!!!
tomagotchii 11 months ago 2
I agree with Type 2 Vtec. Watch "NSX vs Supra". Same vid but up close
DC5Anthony 11 months ago
bitch is fasttt
mrblockboii 1 year ago
Why is that Supra owner only running 16 psi? I've tuned T67 supras to 20 psi on pump gas....
Nettikturbo 1 year ago
if supra or skyline owners are being bigger dicks than usual, the nsx will take care of the problem. the nsx seems to be the only car to piss them off.
Stangorino281 1 year ago
Go watch "Turbo NSX vs Twin turbo supra"....please so all you supra cock-heads can shut up!
Type2Vtec 1 year ago
@Type2Vtec Well I'll look past the fact you have vtec in your name.....but if you're trying to tell everyone here an NSX has near the potential as a supra in straight line races. Please go end yourself.
sirrloin 1 year ago
Regardless what anyone can say. The NSX is a car that define Japenese motoring, then you have the Skyline and the Supra. People sleep on the NSX cause its a cheap ferrari. Work and a fine tune and it over.
Type2Vtec 1 year ago
I rofl'd at last 2 comments
11secSTideadbolt 1 year ago
space shuttle main engines generate the maximum equivalent of about 37 million horsepower. The fuel pump alone delivers as much as 71,000 horsepower
battleborn7 1 year ago
@battleborn7 Yeh but they're rubbish in the corners
thehushman 1 year ago
JESUS CHRIST!....... HOOOOLY FUCK!
i lol'd hard
intelsilver 1 year ago
NSX IS THE TRUTH THAT SUPRA should of known better that two small turbos gonna spooled faster than his t67 either way thumbs up for both cars
MrLilcarter12345 1 year ago
I fear Grand Tourismo is the closest I'll ever get to a NSX :(
St0neLuv 1 year ago
@St0neLuv haha yeah me too
ridegreen78 1 year ago
For the argument of the nsx winning around the track, I encourage a review of the supras records...
jman7425 1 year ago
if i ever get rich, ima buy an nsx and boost it so i can teach the supra boys round my way a lesson :D
rofLopolous 1 year ago
@rofLopolous I doubt it all it takes is a 42r+ turbo supra to decimate all.
nitrousboy0311 1 year ago
Nice to see a old NSX built to haul ass! sounds wicked at idle too!
wugrut 1 year ago
ya using cheap apexi parts to try and tune your 2jz will make you lose to a nsx easy
JunTaoMotorSports 1 year ago
nice pull by the nsx....lets face it people, the nsx won, we can always go into "what if"..is the supra capable of more power, hell yeah. at 16psi, the supra is barely running past stock boost of the stock twins. the nsx is a high comp motor, so at 15psi, its making a lot more power. use that same 67mm turbo and run it up to 25psi and see how the tables turn drastically. also i doubt the nsx can run too much more boost without a costly build
jamaicanlovrboy 1 year ago
they are both legendary and beautiful cars. no fighting over the jdm legends here lol. take the fight to the pos domestics.
InsanityRewritten 1 year ago 2
Glad to see this video is about free of FatF Supra nutswinging ricers.
I actually like the NSX, even though it is about the only import I like.
xZZxTakedown 1 year ago
Any info or website on this nsx?
Cheers.
alundrasrt 1 year ago
yea!!! all about Mid engine more faster and lighter... that's y i own nsx and soon tune 1000hp.... i cant wait when nsx's finish tune
kiddoxsupra2 1 year ago
Why is it that people think that just because it's a supra it is automatically going to win
FUTUREofWIN 1 year ago
chassis we're talkin about here and lbs of boost.
DustinLee533 1 year ago
Give the NSX it's due props. I have a single turbo supra myself, but I love NSX's also. Very unique hand built car and rare to see on the streets. My friend has a NSX turbo that smokes damn near everything on the streets out here in the California bay area.
Soldier19KTanker 1 year ago
tha guy in tha supra doesnt know wat tha fuck to do tha supra could've caught up or passed tha nsx!!
dmbnorthphilly 1 year ago
right your in a nsx supercar and you go "right holy fuck" to a supra single turbo rubbish
WheeLMaN3008 1 year ago
HANDS DOWN THE BEST HONDA SPORTS CAR!
FLAZH007 1 year ago 3
< supra owner in distress after having witnessed such atrocity.
daddyjunkie 1 year ago
Supra still kept letting off too early. Didn't seem like he even gave the car a chance to get into it!
thatsumbody181 1 year ago
oh man this is one of the old Factor X turbo kits that we did back in 03/04 that car made just over 620whp on hi-boost , 100 octane .
it was fun driving that car ,to bad Jason crashed the car .
FXMDGSX 1 year ago
If Bruce Lee was a Car, he'd be an NSX.
pkr150 1 year ago 44
@pkr150 more like a Lotus. There's a fanmade commercial about the Lotus and with Bruce lee too.
carmodifire 1 year ago
@pkr150 and the supra would be IP man... period
upbeatmantis86 1 year ago
@pkr150 if Bruce Lee is an NSX then Chuck Norris is a hybrid F1/Monster Truck
meifert2 1 year ago
@meifert2 if chuck is a f1/monster truck then steven seagul has gotta be a couple of bugatti veyrons combined. thats how indestructably powerfully awesome steven is.
SincerelyJnC 1 year ago
@pkr150 i disagree, i think if bruce lee was a car he would be a ae86, light, nimble, quick, and snappy.
JacksonHagin 1 year ago
I know people are gonna bitch at this, but i dont like the 2JZ-GTE that much, its a turbo 6 cyl putting down about 320hp, and the C-series is an NA V6 producing roughly 295hp. now you tell me which is the better engine.
BYCURE213 1 year ago
@BYCURE213 You're retarded. The 2JZ was designed with a heavy duty iron block and low-compression pistons specifically for forced induction. FI motors like low-comp as it aids in preventing predetonation.. but i doubt you even know what that is.
Your argument would be like saying "NSXs suck because they need high compression, high rpms, and variable timing to get power". Slap some low comp pistons into that C30 and shift at 7k rpm and let me know how fast your vtak wunder engine is dumbass..
jerryatrix9 1 year ago
@jerryatrix9no, but like the tard you are, youd build an NA engine with low comp pistons and low revs. NA engines need High comp, high revs. just because the pistons in a 2JZ are low comp doesnt mean its running low comp because you still have that turbo shoving air into the cyls creating more compression. but hey, i dont know anything about cars i just base my whole life around them and have built some you could only wish to stand next to.
BYCURE213 1 year ago
@BYCURE213 Dumbass, learn to read better. I am aware there is higher compression in a FI engine when under load, otherwise I would'nt have already said the reason for the low-comp pistons was to help prevent detonation. My whole comment was based towards that idiot kid who said the C30 was superior because it made more power in N/A form than the 2JZ. My point was that his argument is idiotic, because a 2JZ is designed for FI to attain higher CFMs, whereas an NSX uses high comp and high revs.
jerryatrix9 1 year ago
@jerryatrix9 forced induction as in turbos correct?
FREESTLE760 1 year ago
@FREESTLE760 Aye, Turbochargers and Superchargers.
jerryatrix9 1 year ago
@BYCURE213 :My case exactly. I would hope to get my hands on a VR4 but if I had my choice of JDM cars, NSX, without hesitation! To hell with Supras
YoniRene 1 year ago 2
i cant see anything! all i hear is turboss! AHHH
integraguy101 1 year ago 3
that nsx owns, damn
DRFTBling711 1 year ago
WOW you supra owners are really pissed off lol although i am a proud supra owner myself i respect the nsx since u hardly ever see them let alone modded to this extent
hamizle 1 year ago 9
when that nsx spooled up....i blew a load in my pants
bigdan4712 1 year ago 2
who won, i cant see anything
be4unvme 1 year ago
Supra was on 16lbs... thats really low for a singled supra
jman7425 1 year ago
slotank, scienceofspeed has their 3.8L stroker kit for nsx. don't get me wrong. both vehicles are engineering marvels, but the nsx was built to track race, not drag. oh yeah! stock vs stock, the nsx spanks the supra.
omyjism 1 year ago
depending on the year nsx, maybe. Generally they are neck to neck stock.
ImportDreams500 1 year ago
imports ftw
jgkov49 1 year ago
yet again honda beats toyota in something lol but we should of know theres really not that many cars that are fucking with the NSX those things are no jokess
3men2sicario 2 years ago
yea im tired of seeing toyota woop hondas ass everyday
slotank 2 years ago
t-67 is not a big turbo, this nsx would not do that to a gt47-88 supra.
noobwithanrs 2 years ago 15
@noobwithanrs well imagine if that nsx was single turbo gt47, yall need 2 stop comparin supras nd skylines 2 civics nsx ob boost is wayyyyyy better than skylines nd supras
homey97 1 year ago
@noobwithanrs Exactly. Everyone is getting all worked up when the max power this supra is going to make is 600hp.
Scions4life 1 year ago
@Scions4life yup
noobwithanrs 1 year ago
@noobwithanrs im glad some one here knows what they are talking about.... but still a good top end race... lol
240SSONLY 1 year ago
@noobwithanrs yeah definitely a supra with a gt47-88 would kill it but the nsx would beat it on the track where there are apex, corkscrews and wat not.
Kuriousgorge87 1 year ago
@Kuriousgorge87 yup.
noobwithanrs 1 year ago
@noobwithanrs but beat any kind of turbo powered supra around corners:D:D a midship car always about cornering:D:D
takimakikaki 1 year ago
@noobwithanrs If this NSX is really equipped with a TT then the performance of the engine should be equel to that of a Supra TT. A single Turbo isn´t playing in the same leage as a TT. Even if the Turbo would be bigger, as long a they run the same boost the twin is taking the win.
Helldorado2008 1 year ago
@Helldorado2008 nsx tt vs. supra tt = nsx wins,,, nsx is lighter than supra plus it has more grip in the rear bein mid engine and all
jawbreakerzzz1 1 year ago
@jawbreakerzzz1 sound´s just about right to me
Helldorado2008 1 year ago
@noobwithanrs im sorry did you not see that yankin dat jus went down come on i would do either car if i had the money but prefer nsx but still woulda,coulda,shoulda no lie dat was a ass beatin no matter what
rafaelislife5 1 year ago
@noobwithanrs I would argue that the NSX has better straight line traction than the supra, and thus the power gets better on the wheels on NSX than on supra
Tuze 1 year ago
@noobwithanrs but a gt47-88 nsx would :)
beastson 11 months ago
@noobwithanrs LOL agreed, the supra would dominate the nsx on a drag race but when it comes to the track with winding roads apex and hair pins, the nsx would dominate the supra. with its mid engine platform, lightness and a high revving engine.
Kuriousgorge87 10 months ago
@Kuriousgorge87 not to mention that NSX have a better handling (plus the better stock engine, as you said), as Honda seems to have issues in improving it for an eventual new version.
09csr 8 months ago
Power to weight ratio on the stock nsx is great add in the extra power of the two turbos and you have a deadly combo as seen here.
300ZXrider1 2 years ago
psi is the pressure
hvtecfreak 2 years ago
ok can someone explain what is turbo then Psi numbers? what does the number mean?
supertrex2 2 years ago
psi stands for pounds per square inches i thinkk
ladida89 2 years ago
you are under the wrong impression. the nsx is faster than the supra. look it up. or you can take my word as an nsx owner
nsxracersb 2 years ago
the supra is easier to make faster cheaper..........400whp with just bolt ons an a couple of them run in the ten sec range with stock turbos......but the nsx is a beat on the cuircut
slotank 2 years ago
an you can take my word as im a supra owner
slotank 2 years ago
the supra is a heavy fiberglass front engine first time car buyer car
nsxracersb 2 years ago
sure the supra is not as expensive as a nsx but its certainly not a first time buyers car........320hp in stock form is not really recomended for new drivers
slotank 2 years ago 2
That what i keep telling everybody
TheDogVI 2 years ago
A 500-550rwhp NSX will trap out at 130-135. The engine must be modded - new pistons arp studs to get pass 400-450rwhp. With the mild mods you can get to 600rwhp. You can push it to 650rwhp but third gear is a weak link at this power level. Many track turbo NSXs run around the 500-550 range. The FactorX time attack car runs in the 750rwhp range and has many track records and won the unlimited class this year. Power is not everything --- they detuned from 900-1000rwhp.
nsxcpt 2 years ago
when fully modded to my tastes... i'd rather have the nsx. it's got more potential. but also cost WAY more to mod than the supra.
to get a baseline turbo nsx, you're spending atleast $10k worth in mods to only get 400'ish hp. for the supra, that can easily be done with bolt-ons on stock twins. that's why many opt to go supra. and you don't have to start thinking about building the 2jz until you're past 700hp. nsx stock engines give out around 500hp is the general concensus
krzfly 2 years ago
its got more potential as a track racer......as a drag car supra gets my vote with a bullet proof 6speed an 2jz engine
slotank 2 years ago
jeeeeeezus christ....... hooooooooooly fawk. that sounds about right
worldcrafter 2 years ago 5
this is strange. Stock the NSX newest model has hp of 290 and the supra has hp or 320. That's if the things were stock. I looked it up at Carpoint(dot)com. I am assuming who had the NSX spent more money under the hood.
IntenseObservation 2 years ago
The NSX might have lesser power than the Supra but it is around 800-1000 lighter than the Supra. That's quite a lot of baggage to haul compare to a NSX. Plus NSX gets better traction because it is a mid engine and there is also less power loss to the wheel compare to the Supra. UPs to the NSX because I owned two of them but I take nothing away from the Supra because with stock bottom end the 2JZ-GTE and handle up to 1000HP. The CA30 and 32 certainly can't do that with stock bottoms end.
Veilside1000HP 2 years ago 2
I have a supra and its a head roller. But I love the NSX, i just read the history and information about the car and im eager to have one. How much did you pay for your nsx and how much you invested on it?
wardogmobius 2 years ago
i dunno why people seem to think the supra is heavy as a truck lol.....mine weighed in at 1490ish kg which is around 3278 pounds so around 500 pounds heavier then the lightest nsx
slotank 2 years ago
@slotank 500 pounds is quite a lot in sports car and car racing world. Try loading 500 pounds of bricks on some car, I am pretty sure it will slow it down significantly.
Veilside1000HP 6 months ago
This title Fails! The Supra is CLEARLY Still Rockin' Twin Snails!
SoCalStar69 2 years ago
supra cannit chase that nsx!
shame!..
drift1356 2 years ago
any1 know exact mods on that nsx?
henrydolly777 2 years ago
id pick any model nsx over any model supra
StevenHGiang 2 years ago
Everyone has their views, but stock vs stock NSX-R rocks the Supra. Supra better drag car, but downside its heavy. NSX is a really well balanced chassis suitable for circuits. It does lack power because it was a car designed back in 1990 and back then 280hp was enough HP. From 1990 to 2005 the car has basically stayed unchanged. Remember the NSX design is REALLY OLD. The engine design is REALLY OLD. First production Variable Valve Timing engine. Besides NSX looks way better then Supra :D
c312eal 2 years ago 20
@c312eal I don' think "REALLY OLD" would be the choice right words to describe the NSX engine. It is the first engine that has dual variable valve timing (intake and exhaust) which is still being used today. OVER-ENGINEERED maybe - the last generation 3.2 L engine (290 HP) even has titanium connecting rods. These engines were designed with reliability as the top priority.
ating555 1 year ago
@ating555 The engine was designed in the 80s. Thats 20 years ago. Pretty old if you ask me. All of the NSX engines the C32B and the 3.0L C30A had titanium connecting rods. Yes you are right at with reliability but you forgot to mention, RELIABILITY at high end performance. The nsx redlines at 8000rpm but it can reliably rev to 9000rpm. It is over engineered. An engine way ahead of its time. Thats why its hard to tune. The cylinders are coated with titanum or something to help cooling.
c312eal 1 year ago
NSX is BEAST. God of JDM right there
c312eal 2 years ago 26
Amen brother
ManuelDr 2 years ago
I don't agree. I hear they're a pain in the ass to modify. You can make any car fast. People who race with them complain about lack of power vs. other modified. You'd have to put a lot of money in to it.
But maybe that's just my preference of the supra over NSX any day.
zenrael 2 years ago
@c312eal God of JDM would be the GT-R R34 not the NSX
damstr 1 year ago
@damstr How wrong are you. Japanese car makers and car people said that the NSX was the God of JDM until the R35. The stock NA2 NSX-R runs faster than the R34 on the 1/4 mile. Lets not even talk about cornering between the R34 vs the NSX. Get your facts straight. Every professional racer in japan will tell you that the NSX is God of JDM and is faster/has more potential than the R34. Fat ass 1500kg R34. PSSSSSH
c312eal 1 year ago
Owned by Honda
It Sucks To Be You
ElitePokerPlayer 2 years ago
Supra Won, t-67mm turbo comon
CFTuRbOtC 2 years ago
No, the Supra is the camera car.
It lost.
mimixownzall 2 years ago 3
I think what he was trying to say was a sequential twin turbo setup. IE One Small Turbo, One Big Turbo. Essentially what happens is the small turbo builds boost quicker to put the second turbo, the bigger one into full boost quicker.
BildoTheGreat69 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hey, Great Video! We would love to have it on our site. Come check us out at C-A-R-C-O-M-M-U-N-I-T-I-E-S-d-o-t-C-O-M.
Make sure to sign up for an account and upload your video! See ya there ;)
sidditalees 2 years ago
agreed to a single turbo would make it faster. but the turbo lag sucks ass.. when your gear up to 4th gear, the second turbo kicks in and thus hurting your back in the seat... but its easier for a twin turbo to spool up faster making quicker shifts =D .. thats if your a pro driver.. The other day i was in the passenger seat of a tt 92 supra and a 2008 M3 was tailing us hard.. when the second turbo kicked in the supra was out. when we came to stop light he said " fuck that's a fast car"
V10Killer2JayZee 2 years ago
"when the second turbo kicked in"
do you even know wtf you are talking about?
The NSX driver knew how to break boost, the supra driver did not, but i still think this NSX is faster than this Supra.
mimixownzall 2 years ago
yeah. the second turbo kicks in.. the car's computer tells it to spool up thus preventing turbo lag.. let me simple it up. when you start the drive the car the first trubo is already spooling up simontaneously(sorry for bad spelling) as the second turbo starts to spool up making it easier for the car to breathe(add a blow off valve) and this makes the fuel/air ratio greater.. there will also be less compression with a twin turbo then a single. a proud owner of a1997 15th anniversary supra T top
V10Killer2JayZee 2 years ago 2
ahhh a supra owner....i would be fucking honored to have one haha. its been my favorite car for 3 years and its my dreaaaaam before i die (or until the zombies come :P) to get one. i need a supra. i am obsessed.
pa1nt13aller 2 years ago
is this meant to be humorous, or did you get a good whack from the stupid stick?
pedro4presidentk 2 years ago
Nice nsx.
To the v10killee a few posts down.
A single turbo supra has a better chance against that nsx. That's why most supras convert to single turbo anyways. Beter top end.
If your such a supra fan, you would have known that
12secSTi 2 years ago
can you really twin turbo an nsx??
ucantcme762 2 years ago
Sure you can, most are single though...including this one. IT IS NOT A TWIN! The motor is also fully built by Factor X and the turbo setup is FX. It would take a 800hp supra to even stand a chance against this NSX. Weight/engine configuration and gearing give the NSX a huge advantage.
SouthSideChiTown14 2 years ago
you can put a turbo on any engine
sjerseyb856 2 years ago
love both cars jdm for life!
Allanmembreno 2 years ago
although im a supra fans, sometimes people dont know what hondas could do . thumbs up honda
V10Killer2JayZee 2 years ago 2
well lets see a video with a twin turbo nsx and a twin turbo supra. thats a highly respectable race. didnt think the nsx would sound that nasty
V10Killer2JayZee 2 years ago
wow thats one quick nsx!! luv to see supra beat one in a while. love supra's but got damn i love nsx's
vteccustums 2 years ago
muahahahaha
vollgas83 2 years ago
I'd like to see this NSX against that white camaro in the Bay Area racing videos
Siguy999 2 years ago
best part from :33 to :39.....
R18SEDAN 2 years ago
LISTEN UP!!!! The NSX is a SINGLE TURBO FactorX built motor and T67 turbo. It is making 500whp. It is a fully built engine running 9.0/1 compression. It is not stock! It will take AT LEAST a 650+hp supra to win this race. Weight and engine configuration are what make the difference. Transversely mounted VS longitudinally mounted....30% VS 15% drivetraine losses. Getting the power to the wheels is the diffenence here!
SouthSideChiTown14 2 years ago
naa that supra owner just needs a T88 not a T67 lol
phatdrifter 2 years ago
Not to be outdone there is a civic drag car with an acura nsx motor putting out 1,600 horses.
Mariolude 2 years ago
is that the aem drag civic ?
TheMugenboy 1 year ago
yup i think your right its the aem civic but look up titan celica it runs a 2jzgte an runs 6.4 at its best which makes it the fastest import at the drag strip
slotank 1 year ago
@slotank cool, I'll check it out dude .
TheMugenboy 1 year ago
type in titan celica an titan scion, rayglass celica an gas motor sports celica all running 6s, so theres more then one theres more like more then 4 or 5 of these 2jz powered cars doing 6s down the qaurter mile, fastest being in the 6.4s
slotank 1 year ago
The Supra is a fast and strong car but you gotta love the NSX. It's my dream car, wish I could afford one and sick ass video!
bbv90612