How can ppl not be interested in this stuff? I try to tell my friends about black holes and pulsar stars and they just look at me like an idiot!? Like thinking about this is not cool or sumthing
The information in this video is thoroughly dated. Cosmological "redshift" has been shown to be no indication of distance or of velocity. "Big bang" and "tired light" assumptions have been falsified by direct observation. These "quasars" are typically ejected from galaxies, they are not fantastically bright or preposterously distant, they are just luminous objects electrically ejected from galaxies.
@fertilizerspike So you claim you know more than the astronomers who all agree with the theory that the quasars are from an early stage of cosmic evolution?
Astronomers are scientists. Scientists tend not to believe in things for which there is no evidence. Any researcher who thinks the term "early" even has any relevance in this universe is not a scientist, they are an astronoger. "Big bang" is an absurd creationist myth, not science. Further, anyone who is aware of the data and still clings to this idea that "quasars" are all incredibly distant (and therefore old) and more massive than observations suggest is an astronoger.
@fertilizerspike Your first 2 statements are certainly true. There is ample evidence for the Big Bang. Therefore astronomers are correct to believe the Big Bang theory and quasars are distant objects.
There is no evidence that verifies "big bang". It is an absurd creationist myth that has been elevated gradually over time to the status of dogma. There is nothing scientific about ex nihilo creation, "big bang" is not science, it's essentially the genesis myth from the bible without mentioning god. It was invented by a belgian priest.
NGC 7319 is a galaxy with a higher "redshift" quasar in front of it. This falsifies "redshift = distance = velocity" as well as "big bang".
@zer0dahero Had you paid attention to the comments by the astronomers in segment 4 of this episode on quasars, you would realize that their hypothesis on black holes as the source of the energy in quasars have proven to be ENTIRELY CORRECT. What we know today about quasars are based on the research of these very same astronomers. Don't make comments about subjects that you are not knowledgeable about.
@zer0dahero I disagree, I've followed the space program for many years and I worked in aersopsace. While some information may be dated much is still relevant. I think for many because the show doesn't have a modern look to it they dismiss it's content. Yet I haven't seen another program that even comes close to its depth.
@zer0dahero I disagree, I've followed the space program for many years and I worked in aersopsace. While some information may be dated much is still relevant. I think for many because the show doesn't have a modern look to it they dismiss it's content. Yet I haven't seen another program that even comes close to its depth.
Just because these video's were made years ago the information is still relevant. As a matter of fact this was a college accredited course. It was well done and feature the actual astronomers themselves.
This series of videos is great! I grew up with these learning astronomy in the 1980's. These videos were made in the late 1970's. These are outdated,yes, but still educational for the beginner. PBS and Nova have excellent recent shows on Astronomy (e.g. Quasars, Black Holes). It would be nice if they would update this show to present...Great to see it again though!! Thank you :)
Yes it's an old video, about 1978 production date according to the trailer in part 4, but good for its time. If you have a better recent video on quasars, please upload it!
The astronomers in this video series are the ones that made the discoveries that allows us to understand what we know today about the universe. It is truly wonderful to hear them directly talk about it.
@WarrenChu000 Why does every comment HAVE to be useful? Just poking a bit of fun at the obvious age of this video. Not meant to offend anyone. Apologize if I did.
@Hustada Thank you. This series is a classic because of its comprehensive survey of astronomy. Although astronomy has made huge advances since this series was made, all the concepts presented are still completely relevant and unsurpassed in the way they are presented.
Loved watching this show as a kid <3
MrSpinteractive 3 months ago
How can ppl not be interested in this stuff? I try to tell my friends about black holes and pulsar stars and they just look at me like an idiot!? Like thinking about this is not cool or sumthing
TheDrunkenTrooper 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The information in this video is thoroughly dated. Cosmological "redshift" has been shown to be no indication of distance or of velocity. "Big bang" and "tired light" assumptions have been falsified by direct observation. These "quasars" are typically ejected from galaxies, they are not fantastically bright or preposterously distant, they are just luminous objects electrically ejected from galaxies.
fertilizerspike 1 year ago
@fertilizerspike So you claim you know more than the astronomers who all agree with the theory that the quasars are from an early stage of cosmic evolution?
WarrenChu000 1 year ago
@WarrenChu000
Astronomers are scientists. Scientists tend not to believe in things for which there is no evidence. Any researcher who thinks the term "early" even has any relevance in this universe is not a scientist, they are an astronoger. "Big bang" is an absurd creationist myth, not science. Further, anyone who is aware of the data and still clings to this idea that "quasars" are all incredibly distant (and therefore old) and more massive than observations suggest is an astronoger.
fertilizerspike 1 year ago
@fertilizerspike Your first 2 statements are certainly true. There is ample evidence for the Big Bang. Therefore astronomers are correct to believe the Big Bang theory and quasars are distant objects.
WarrenChu000 1 year ago
@WarrenChu000
There is no evidence that verifies "big bang". It is an absurd creationist myth that has been elevated gradually over time to the status of dogma. There is nothing scientific about ex nihilo creation, "big bang" is not science, it's essentially the genesis myth from the bible without mentioning god. It was invented by a belgian priest.
NGC 7319 is a galaxy with a higher "redshift" quasar in front of it. This falsifies "redshift = distance = velocity" as well as "big bang".
fertilizerspike 1 year ago
@fertilizerspike Did you eat lead-based paint chips as a child?
BorgDrone000 1 year ago
@zer0dahero Had you paid attention to the comments by the astronomers in segment 4 of this episode on quasars, you would realize that their hypothesis on black holes as the source of the energy in quasars have proven to be ENTIRELY CORRECT. What we know today about quasars are based on the research of these very same astronomers. Don't make comments about subjects that you are not knowledgeable about.
WarrenChu000 1 year ago
@zer0dahero I disagree, I've followed the space program for many years and I worked in aersopsace. While some information may be dated much is still relevant. I think for many because the show doesn't have a modern look to it they dismiss it's content. Yet I haven't seen another program that even comes close to its depth.
beachnikk 1 year ago
@zer0dahero I disagree, I've followed the space program for many years and I worked in aersopsace. While some information may be dated much is still relevant. I think for many because the show doesn't have a modern look to it they dismiss it's content. Yet I haven't seen another program that even comes close to its depth.
beachnikk 1 year ago
Just because these video's were made years ago the information is still relevant. As a matter of fact this was a college accredited course. It was well done and feature the actual astronomers themselves.
beachnikk 1 year ago
@beachnikk Thank you for your comment.
WarrenChu000 1 year ago
Isn't it true that which we think is a circle if formed natural is really a spiral?
toechesse 2 years ago
@toechesse Sounds true.
spiralcosmosart 1 year ago
@toechesse This comment makes no sense and has no relevance to this video.
WarrenChu000 1 year ago
This series of videos is great! I grew up with these learning astronomy in the 1980's. These videos were made in the late 1970's. These are outdated,yes, but still educational for the beginner. PBS and Nova have excellent recent shows on Astronomy (e.g. Quasars, Black Holes). It would be nice if they would update this show to present...Great to see it again though!! Thank you :)
mickmrn 2 years ago
Yes it's an old video, about 1978 production date according to the trailer in part 4, but good for its time. If you have a better recent video on quasars, please upload it!
acegregory 2 years ago
I think this video is more ancient than the quasars themselves.
Hustada 2 years ago 16
The astronomers in this video series are the ones that made the discoveries that allows us to understand what we know today about the universe. It is truly wonderful to hear them directly talk about it.
WarrenChu000 1 year ago
@Hustada Thank you for the absolutely useless comment.
WarrenChu000 1 year ago
@WarrenChu000 Why does every comment HAVE to be useful? Just poking a bit of fun at the obvious age of this video. Not meant to offend anyone. Apologize if I did.
Hustada 1 year ago
@Hustada Thank you. This series is a classic because of its comprehensive survey of astronomy. Although astronomy has made huge advances since this series was made, all the concepts presented are still completely relevant and unsurpassed in the way they are presented.
WarrenChu000 1 year ago
@WarrenChu000 Regardless of their age, the content is very interesting. Thanks for posting Warren.
Hustada 1 year ago
This smells VERY old.. When was this made?
Thymonico 2 years ago 6
@Thymonico I suggest you get your nose fixed.
WarrenChu000 1 year ago 2
I watched this show, Project Universe, on KCET or KOCE faithfully when I was a kid. What a treat it is to see a bit of it here.
rsp196607 3 years ago 12
Great video.Thank YOU
blusior 4 years ago 5