I think, if rumours are correct for the PS4 going multicore and for release in 2012. Then maybe they should do a Quad, becasue no real game on the PC uses a Quad to play at high, Arma 2 uses Quad for recommended and plays excellcent with my AMD II x4 3.2ghz.
They have to make a leap for the PC's sake, Microsoft can shove it, becasue they thing Natal is like a new console to them. So its probably the PS4 coming soon.
What do others think for the next generationg of console ?? GPU,CPU etc.
@BigBoiBoss1 They should look into a processor aa head of hte quad, and i od not think the PS4 is coming out in 2012. but when it does the quad qore will probrobly be out dated and they should use what ever Processor is out that holds the title "Most powerful Processor on the planet".
hey this is your opinion xbox 360 and ps3 really they have no diffrents just the ps3 is alot darker and 360 lighter so it's really just lay's on if you like dark or light game play one this is the 360 has alot of contrast and ps3 does not so this type of game will look better becuase of lighting of the 360, ps3 killzone or mgs4 are better darker so those are the type of game's ps3 would look better in so it's 50 360 50 ps3
i cant care enough.... i'm still to see a good game published on CryEngine,
Crysis and "Farcries" dont even get to the feet of Unreal Engine published game... CryEngine sounds more like a benchmark tool than an actual game engine
true, pc is better but its still impressive how well the consoles can play it.
and just for others out there, yes the PC version looks better but most pc fans blow things totally out of proportion. yes PC looks and gets faster FPS, but its by probably one quality setting. xbox and ps3 both look like they are on high settings while PC will be able to play them on very high, not too terribly big of a difference.
that is until DX 11 hits, then it will be more noticable.
bullshit the guys that are makeing god of war 3 sed it will run at 60fps (most of the time cus sometimes when hundgreds of enenies are on screen it will jrop to 30fps)
Well that comment proves you're lying - its pathetic.
90% of the shadows are removed, alot of post processing gone or reduced, much lower resolution and flat textures like all console games - just some of the things I noticed at a glance. Anyone claiming otherwise is just dillusional.
That said it still looks unbelievable for a console game.
I think, if rumours are correct for the PS4 going multicore and for release in 2012. Then maybe they should do a Quad, becasue no real game on the PC uses a Quad to play at high, Arma 2 uses Quad for recommended and plays excellcent with my AMD II x4 3.2ghz.
They have to make a leap for the PC's sake, Microsoft can shove it, becasue they thing Natal is like a new console to them. So its probably the PS4 coming soon.
What do others think for the next generationg of console ?? GPU,CPU etc.
BigBoiBoss1 2 years ago
@BigBoiBoss1 They should look into a processor aa head of hte quad, and i od not think the PS4 is coming out in 2012. but when it does the quad qore will probrobly be out dated and they should use what ever Processor is out that holds the title "Most powerful Processor on the planet".
amartinez97 10 months ago
PC all the way.
lol but itll be cool if they had some of that urban fighting gameplay in crysis
CoolViet93 2 years ago 2
both are great...
but i prefer the x360 a lil bit more
1994german1994 2 years ago
PC - awesom graphic
PS3 - ok
X360 - WTF
Gricle 2 years ago
I think both xbox and ps3 graphics look fine. Retard.
ArturikLV 2 years ago 3
so when does it come out?
rethedred 2 years ago
lol they just looks the same xD
OlleSwe90 2 years ago
hey this is your opinion xbox 360 and ps3 really they have no diffrents just the ps3 is alot darker and 360 lighter so it's really just lay's on if you like dark or light game play one this is the 360 has alot of contrast and ps3 does not so this type of game will look better becuase of lighting of the 360, ps3 killzone or mgs4 are better darker so those are the type of game's ps3 would look better in so it's 50 360 50 ps3
killerv135 2 years ago 2
Its' darker because on PS3 you have to turn ON super white In options..
G0SP0DAR 2 years ago
well you must be the only guy that got a brain (=
OlleSwe90 2 years ago
hooray it might finally be more friendly to ati cards
Tinfoilpain 2 years ago 4
i cant care enough.... i'm still to see a good game published on CryEngine,
Crysis and "Farcries" dont even get to the feet of Unreal Engine published game... CryEngine sounds more like a benchmark tool than an actual game engine
StridBR 2 years ago
its looks better on ps3 than xbox 360.
lilnz3 2 years ago 3
no
they r the same
davidof619902 2 years ago
nope
GamerOMatic 2 years ago
yep
davidof619902 2 years ago
And both don't look as good as the pc!
liveswired 2 years ago
is this crysis 2
xxragesonicxx 2 years ago
maybe, it is shown on console.
tdk12 2 years ago
Crysis and Crysis warhead look A LOT better since consoles dont have the power to run such graphics.
Spockkker 2 years ago
? the graphics look the exact same man
GeForce47 2 years ago
dont have the power?? Didnt u just see the video?? it has the cryengine just like Crysis.
XGamerX620 2 years ago
consoles look exactly the same, ps3 seems to have a darker shade of green. thats about it
ninjaseven 2 years ago
shitty textures my ass >_>
you're watching this video on youtube you know?
mrnewsman6660 2 years ago 5
agreed with him below.
Tatazildo 2 years ago
shitty textures, in pc it looks infinite better
mayituck 2 years ago
true, pc is better but its still impressive how well the consoles can play it.
and just for others out there, yes the PC version looks better but most pc fans blow things totally out of proportion. yes PC looks and gets faster FPS, but its by probably one quality setting. xbox and ps3 both look like they are on high settings while PC will be able to play them on very high, not too terribly big of a difference.
that is until DX 11 hits, then it will be more noticable.
just my 2 cents
ninjaseven 2 years ago
shitty textures are u blind or what?? This even looks better than PC
GeForce47 2 years ago
remember the GCD06 crysis videos? 60 fps on Ultra high settings? They were rendered frame by frame.
30fps max that the consoles will have
Xmeagol 2 years ago
wow why are u so sure about that??
30FPS? Do you think anyone would make a game that would run at 30FPS max to a console? huh
GeForce47 2 years ago
bullshit the guys that are makeing god of war 3 sed it will run at 60fps (most of the time cus sometimes when hundgreds of enenies are on screen it will jrop to 30fps)
amartinez97 2 years ago
Crytek hasn't gave out licenses yet, lol.
Xmeagol 2 years ago
the framerate will not drop to 30FPS get over it -.-
GeForce47 2 years ago
yes that looks better than crysis on PC and i play crysis maxed out.
1994german1994 2 years ago
Well that comment proves you're lying - its pathetic.
90% of the shadows are removed, alot of post processing gone or reduced, much lower resolution and flat textures like all console games - just some of the things I noticed at a glance. Anyone claiming otherwise is just dillusional.
That said it still looks unbelievable for a console game.
liveswired 2 years ago
Shadow update rate is much lower as well. I found it annoying.
SlyNine 2 years ago
Crysis 2 is coming!*.* And will be in a city this time!
DarknessDiego 2 years ago 3
hehe wcale nie nie zamkneli :)
peter14000 2 years ago
dokładnie......żałoba za bash'a !! :(
jaceksuj 2 years ago
my tutaj ogladamy silnik play'a 3 a basha zamkneli!!! watch?v=5LGb9KnJJh4 :((
Olej1906 2 years ago