That's about idle for an F-22. Everyone in the world hates us cause they are jealous. I see all kinds of Euro shit on here with high speed Alpha jet passes down the Mach Loop....LMFAO.
@UnufcE I am so sorry you got shut down and have nothing to say. You got out smarted at what you thought was your own game, in reality you don't know anything about aviation. Reply and let me know what ratings you hold... If any.
@UnufcE YOU SIR ARE A FUCKING IDIOT! 760 mph is fast, faster than you will ever experience. Obviously the jet wasn't flying as fast as it can... Next time I put up a video I will be sure the jet is traveling at Vno to please you and your ignorant ass liberal fucking mind. I never asked you to come watch my video take your shit somewhere else.
ok for the people who say ALL I THINK OF IS STARSCREAM WHEN I SEE THIS are just newbs they dont really like it for what it is. if the transformers movie didnt come out they wouldnt give a dam about the f-22. i care for it because one of my uncles is in the air force and he specificly flys the f-22 raptor. im not tryin to dog on anyone here its just people dont care for it unless its on a popular movie
BEYOND THE F-22: The latest Editorial-Review published this April online at DOI: 10.1515/TJJ.2011.006, /April/2011 covers Jet-Steered [thrust vectored] vehicles beyond the F-22, namely: (1) The next-generation, super-agile, thrust vectored, stealth, tailless, manned and unmanned vehicles, (2) maximization of flight safety in preventing crashes by jet steering when conventional flight control fails.
@za10aj12 I just cannot stand when I find a video I really liked and want to read all the comments and they are really long. It just really bothers me. The other day I was driving down the street and you will never guess what I saw but it was a car crash. Shortly afterward I went and got fuel for my car then went to work. It was a hot work day but overall went rather. Well. Oh by the way don't read long stuff if you don't want to.
@fabianromano thats not high speed. :/ Lol thats actually pretty slow. Going supersonic is illegal in civilian-populated areas. Also it's illegal under several thousand feet in altitude.
Those are facts. Hell even with tranche 3, the Tiffy STILL doesn't have the capabilities of the F-15. As for costs... £125m or 199 million dollars per Tiffy (includes development costs)... F-22? $150 million per unit including development costs. Too expensive??? I recommend YOU go back and read up, Boy.
So does the Typhoon... your point? The Typhoon is more expensive per aircraft than the F-22. The Air Force warned that when the F-22 entered service it would be expensive to support for the first year to 18 months until units could manage the fighter properly. Costs for managing the F-22 are already down nearly 70% from where they were. Stop basing your idiocy on information you Bing'ed or Googled that is 3-4 years old. Fucktard.
This isn't WW2. One Bone can do as much as a full squadron of B-17's could do, and be 1000x more accurate. Not to mention the real reason German lost the war was fighting in Russia and a total group of nutters in charge. The air war would have been much different if the Me 262 was in service like it was scheduled to be (1943) and the Luftwaffe run by Galland without interference...
@PhotoShopChannel Haha really, the F-22 is a pile of shit? Um no its actually probably the best fighter in the world. And probably the reason he said that was because on alot of videos of the U.S. military theres always some European trolls talking shit about our military, its annoying as fuck.
All F-22's are currently grounded because there might be a problem with the pilot oxygen system which led to a crash in Alaska. Hopefully they can fix this issue and make them able to get back up soon. Once Lockheed Martin makes sure the oxygen system is safe, I hope Congress allows the USAF to buy more. Expensive but a good thing to have defend the lagre areas the United States has to cover.
@jdmess14hc so they cancelled f22 production? that sucks. my cousin told me obama also recently cancelled f35 production. what gives? i mean come on. those 2 planes are the most technologicaly advanced planes in the world. i mean sure, they are friggin expensive but you have to think of the long term. you would only have to buy a few and you would have control of the skys for decades. you wouldnt have to upgrade them that often.
@ACFriday6 Yeah the F22 was halted a few years ago I think that was the purpose of the F35...I didn't hear they cancelled that one though that would suck. and you're 100% right that's the whole point.
@ACFriday6 Oh I found it so they put the F-35B (USMC version) on hold until some issues are fixed, and the Navy and AF orders for the 35C and A may be cut in half for now I don't think there's anything conclusive thus far. They did talk about cancellation but they didn't go thru with it cuz it would cause a huge fighter gap in the arsenal.
You people that say that other fighters are better are not being honest with yourselves. f 15s have been out for years and they still have a superb record. Let us face it, no one even got a kill on an f-15 yet more or less these raptors. Keep dreaming...
At first I thought these were a waste of money,but since China wants to step and play with the big boys I say we should invest in more....Ex Navy ,so I will always feel that they could have given the F14 an E,F,and G model.Miss the CATS.
There was little suprise that Typhoon, with its world-class agility and high off-boresight missile capability was able to dominate "Within Visual Range" flight, but the aircraft did cause a suprise by getting a radar lock on the F22 at a suprisingly long range. The F-22s cried off, claiming that they were "unstealthed" anyway, although the next day´s scheduled two vs. two BWR engagement was canceled, and "the USAF decided they didn´t want to play any more
@ylad1999 That's exactly what I've read (and I believe it's true). Do you have the source? I can't find it. BTW. I simply don't understand that some here claim the F22 is more manoeuvrable than the Thypon. It weighs 10 ton more and if that doesn't make is clumsy the stealth nonsense will. History repeats itself in that it's like the Phantoms vs the nimble Migs in Vietnam. It flies but it's too big. Same business with the F35 that I expect will be bagged ("too big to fall" or not).
@GranTurismo5Fan11 You're absolutely right my friend, there could never be proper replacements for either of the f-14 or the f-15, and frankly the hornet and the raptor get totally embarassed in the speed and range department by them, this is what we call a FAIL.
@SuperCncguy you know, apart from the supercruise, stealth and some othere abilities, the raptor is really an average fighterjet. I don't think it is bad, its just that it is made in a much more civilized way (thats why i dont like it :)) The thing is, it can do some really good things, it has fairly advanced avionics, making the job easier for the pilot for example. And information flow, the most important thing, is also quiet advanced. In terms of sheer performance, id choose something else.
But you're wrong. It's useless and wildy expensive. So much so that the United States has stopped producing them. Why do you think we haven't used them in Iraq and Afghanistan?
@dickbutt63 First let me start by saying how liberal and uninformed that video is. The F-22 Raptor is the best aircraft design ever created by a being with a human brain. Its actually limited by a computer to its maneuverability. Without that computer, the G forces would tear the pilot's spine from his body. No other aircraft, Russian or Chinese is capable of its ability. The F-22 was able to "shoot down" 20 F-15's before the F-15's even found it where it was. I can go on but I have no space.
This video has Australian experts (Australians who were to purchase F-22's) call the raptor useless after war games which pitted f-22's along with f-18s against russian and chinese fighters. You never know what media to believe but I think it would be wise to research both sides of an argument before you mindlessly consume the propaganda the US shoves down your throat.
@dickbutt63 The United State has never nor will never sell its F-22. You're thinking of the F-35. I have done my research. I am an aeronautical engineering major at the University of Arizona, while doing ROTC, and I plan on flying for the air force. The media I believe is called the Majors and Lieutenants of the United States air force, as well as majors are the demonstration squadron. The F-22, has capabilities and 70,000 lbs of thrust that is unmatch by anyone. Believe it.
@dickbutt63 Dont be so sure little boy. I've already got hours up... They didn't lose. The SU-47 has lost in simulations to the F-22 already. Now, go comment on vevo videos about how much you hate their ads.
Remember the part when I referenced outside sources and you just said, "no you're wrong no you're wrong." who is the little boy again? And you already have hours up? in what, a crop duster? Anyone can pay for flight lessons you weaselly little cunt.
@dickbutt63 I don't know why you're so hostile all of the sudden. Your outside sources are pathetic. Australians talking about planes they've probably never seen fly over their skies and suddenly they're experts? Get real kid. Not anyone can pay for flight lessons. I'm sure a ghetto tough internet kid cant pay the $250+ per hour it costs to get lessons. 40 hours until a solo too. So, UMADBRO?
Listen to the pilots themselves lol. Who says those sources are even backed up by reliable sources? Shya the F-22 cost $19,000 to maintain per flight hour, but it still does its job uncomparibly ;)
The only advantage the F-22 has is electronics and radar. Sukhoi fighters are faster and more maneuverable. And as far as the pilots giving testament to how their planes are the best in the world, look at it this way: Imagine you work for Chevrolet. Secondly, imagine a reporter is asking you what motor company makes the best pick up trucks. What would you tell the reporter, regardless of facts?
@dickbutt63 [Sukhoi fighters are faster and more maneuverable. And as far as the pilots giving testament to how their planes are the best in the world] That's a bunch of bullcrap. I can find many pilots from around the world that have said the F22 is top notch. . + add external stores to those Su's and see how they perform. W/ external stores they don't perform the same as what you see at airshows.
@asusucks actually he's right re top speed su-27/35 has a faster top end due to design differences, stealth vs just speed. Some maneuvers maybe as well, but not all by a long shot. The 22 can't use all the thrust it has, would burn up the airframe!! Overall, European, not US, simulations have a 10-1 kill ratio in the 22's favor. not even close...
@nwtruckerll If that's the case then I bet his figures are when the aircraft are flying clean. As you know adding external stores creates drag which reduces speed and maneuverability. & as far as I know the USAF still has never released the top speed of the F22. If you have seen a USAF statement saying otherwise then I would appreciate a link to it. I have seen a release that it's been able to go I believe Mach 1.78 w/o AB.
You're an idiot. Most infants that show any interest in aircraft know that there is NOTHING made that can come even remotely close to the F-22. Furthermore, you, and most "commoner-nobodys" like yourself will never know what this aircraft can actually do. Lastly, (ROFL!) if you think what you see at these "airshow" demonstrations" is anything close to this aircraft's true potential them you're actually as stupid as you sentence structuring indicates.
@matthewcardinals that's why it was canceled, lol that why only 40 percent of f-22 are not defected. that's why the f-22 f-35 and f-18 proved useless in pacific vision against sukhois?stealth due to computer aider design is myth, because inoder for the aircraft to see the enemy beyong visual range it must use it's own radars, immediately given it location. learn something /watch?v=27qdB1D0s9M&feature=related. US air superiorety is a fantacy. russian aircraft downed hundreds american in 20 m
@alex080297 The plane was cancelled cuz it was supposed to fight the Soviet Union, which doesnt exist anymore. And 40% are defective because the plane has over 500,000 pieces in it, all which need to work perfectly. If one doesnt work the plane needs to go in for maintenance. Its part of having a plane. And lmao radar works with the shape of an aircraft. For the raptor to be detected it would physically have to change shape not use its own radar. Please research before you attempt to outsmart me
@matthewcardinals you clearly are not a good listener. I said only 40% ARE NOT DEFECTED. AND having something with so many parts is not reliable. I said when the raptor uses it's radar it is giving it's location right away. I don't need to research because i know what i am talking about, and i am not trying to outsmart you because we all are people and we are the same. I am only showing u the other side. personaly i like the pak fa more. I don't like this fighter the f-15 is my fav american
@alex080297 Do you know how Radar works? You can not be detected for using radar. The shape needs to physically change. The F-22 has radar absorbing materials and the shape reflects the radar beams. Those never change so the aircraft will never be detected. Besides, a Raptors radar is so advanced that it would detect the enemy aircraft before its even in range of the enemy's radar. So even if it were to be able to be detected (which it isnt) it would shoot the enemy down before they even see it.
@matthewcardinals I too believe you are wrong on this one. Using radar means sending out radio waves thus giving away position. Secondly the Raptor and any other "stealth" can in some extent all be seen on radar. The echo may be small but radars can or will be able to see'm. Btw. I saw a story where the Raptor was supposed to show off against two Thypons who happened to spot it at long range. It might be a false but I don't trust stealth-tech. Radar development will make it useless.
@hrc1966 Radio waves dont give off position. Theyre forms of light. Not a material that reflects radar waves. And the F-22 has the radar signature of a steel marble, youre correct there. But to a bad guy scanning radar, a steel marble doesn't look like a fighter jet haha.
@matthewcardinals Oh yes they do. How do you think GPS works? Any radio wave emitted can be traced back to its sender! The F22 may have an absolute best cast signature of a marble which will render it stealth, but what about all the other angles? It's visible all right and radar improvements will catch up making the plane pretty useless. Mind you, the Chinese are stealing F35 secrets with both hands (was it several terrabyte they nicked?) and if radar signature information is leaked it is BAD!
@matthewcardinals too bad it doesn't have missiles to reach that distance. only aim-120 wich is mid range missile, russian missiles reach 120 and 160 km other awacs killer missiles are 400 km, and russian radars are more advanced then american. Also russian fighters have more then 1 radar unlike the f-22. russian fighters have rear radars as well
@matthewcardinals It's not that the Raptor's radar is so advanced, which it is, but the Raptor is one of the first fighters to be "Netcentric equipped". The Raptor doesn't even have to turn on it's radar because AWACS will report target information to Raptor digitally, and so F-22 will be emitting for a minimum of time...the bare minimum. Netcentric warfare is the name of the game. Raptor and F-35 are new generation Netcentric warplanes. THAT's the difference.
@mihailofsx Agreed, I just have a hard time with a fighter aircraft that is supposed to proceed another but cant nearly match the speed. Besides, a fighter can do all sorts of crazy things...fine and dandy, but the fact is the PILOT can only take 9 g's. period.
@SuperCncguy im an f-16 crew chief and i can tell you since learning about the f-22 thru upgrade training and questioning the raptor crew chiefs, the f-22 is significantly faster then all current fighters that the u.s. military currently flys. would love to give you an exact top speed but it is still classified
@EricG2122 And I'm a former Jet engine mechanic who built GE F100's before the -110 changeover on F16's everyday and crawled in F15 intakes on the flight line with a scope and I can tell you #1 Their speed has been publicly released for some time now #2 while i WILL agree the government downplays a bit but the facts remain the F14&15's are much faster. The stealth nature and variable nozzle (what actually GIVES it its superior maneuverability hinder performance as far as top speed is concerned.
@EricG2122 And I'm a former Jet engine mechanic who built GE F100's before the -110 changeover on F16's everyday and crawled in F15 intakes on the flight line with a scope and I can tell you #1 Their speed has been publicly released for some time now #2 while i WILL agree the government downplays a bit but the facts remain the F14&15's are much faster. The stealth nature and variable nozzle (what actually GIVES it its superior maneuverability hinder performance as far as top speed is concerned
@mihailofsx hahaha, it's funny how you say the F-22 is like every other fighter EXCEPT for everything that make it so much better, you contradict yourself.
@TheSnivilous Ok, lets get this straight! The F-22 is not like any other fighter jet! What it has that others dont have is: Advanced avionics and advanced stealth. What it makes it ordinary is performance in combat! In terms of ferry range (bearing in mind supercruise) F-22: 1,600 nmi; Su-27: 1 900 nmi; F-15: 3,000 nmi!!! Thrust/weight: F-22: 1.08; Su-27: 1.09; F-15: 1.12. Max rate of climb: F-22(classified); Su-27: 54,000 ft/min; F-15: 50,000 ft/min. SO: Range=SHIT. T/W=DISASTER. MRC: SHIT!
@Nataku81 Check my comments my friend, i mentioned "supercruise" a few times. Supercruise is the ability of the F-22 to maintain 1.3 Mach supersonic flight at an altitude of 35 000 ft without the use of afterburners. I believe this characteristic is an advantage, but it brings no good. Thats why I said, bearing in mind the supercuise ability, the F-22's range is still just 1600 nmi, much less then the F-15 for example. And the F-15's range is 3000 nmi.
@mihailofsx yo the f22 is one of the worst fighters america has made... it has a major failure every 1.7 hours, it cant fly in rain, it needs repairs after every flight, and it took thirty years to make... and now it is canceld and not made anymore its shit
@DrummingBonham xD everything you said came out the mouth of rachel maddow lol you believe anything the news tells because the Air force association came out and laughed at the negative things said about the F 22 JUST LIKE I AM XD XD XD XD, what else did the news tell you to know today? ge learn real shit instead waiting sitting watching the news for bullshit twisted up stories, as soon as a news corporation buys a story they can legally change and broadcast it in anyway even if its wrong.
@DrummingBonham early F-22's had penny size damage on the skin that had to be painted, the paint took a day and a half to dry or 3o hrs. it is still maintainence but you see how the news twisted that. also production was halted do to military budget cuts which had to do nothing with the F-22's performance which is excellent.
I have checked your channels and liked your videos very much. thats why i am going to subscribe you. Plz check mine videos and subscribe me if you like to.
I want one!
ACfireandiceDC 1 month ago
cool. Rutan Varieze
backintack 1 month ago
i looove that plane :D
frank22517 1 month ago
So slow.. you could hear the jet as it flew by.
rjriley7 2 months ago
thats super cool. what speed would it be roughly doing ? 300-400 mph ?
ExecutionerThe 2 months ago
@ExecutionerThe
more like around 1,220 mph
TheWhiteboy3431 2 months ago
@TheWhiteboy3431 Swing and a miss....
Thump505 1 month ago
@ExecutionerThe If it was high speed, anywhere from 500 to 600 is a good approximate without asking the demonstrator.
Thump505 1 month ago
please don't put an annotation in the center of the video, we can see your account name right above the video
st3v0011 3 months ago
They never allow them to pass the "sound barrier". Not really sure why but yeah they dont ever go supersonic.
bluepros915 3 months ago
@bluepros915 They can't go supersonic at air shows because it would royally fuck everyone's ears.
ImRusko 3 months ago 5
That's about idle for an F-22. Everyone in the world hates us cause they are jealous. I see all kinds of Euro shit on here with high speed Alpha jet passes down the Mach Loop....LMFAO.
anpmech 3 months ago
Comment removed
anpmech 3 months ago
@va7oloko If they flew top speed that low everyone in the stands would be bleeding from the ears. Anyone and everyone with a pacemaker would be dead.
gmet 3 months ago 12
That is definitely true.
Nastafar 3 months ago
@gmet You can't hear anything traveling over the speed of sound?
94mcliam 3 months ago
Starscream! :D <3
TheChainsawArtist 3 months ago
@babylauncher3000 I think its more like mach 1.5-1.75
va7oloko 3 months ago
i want to see them fly over 2000km/h
TheYasill 4 months ago
i was there!
FastRedDragon1984 4 months ago
That's probably not half as fast as it can really go.
CopperheadViper 4 months ago
@CopperheadViper
Your correct. That was less then Mach 1 and a Raptor can go Mach 2.25
Babylauncher3000 4 months ago
@Babylauncher3000 Its a shame they wont let em fly top speed.
CopperheadViper 4 months ago 2
@CopperheadViper the top speed is confidential but it's probably around 1800 miles per hour
GatremagWenYm 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"u jelly eurofags?"
This doesn't even make sense.
lexichronicle2 4 months ago
title should be- not that high speed pass
rossm21uk 4 months ago
85 people missed it
SugarAA95 5 months ago
it was low speed pass
TheUndergroundStage 5 months ago
sooo cool ~~~so fast
teajoefish1 5 months ago
@UnufcE your second post has no relevance... everyone sees that tough guy :)
N2369Z 5 months ago
@UnufcE I am so sorry you got shut down and have nothing to say. You got out smarted at what you thought was your own game, in reality you don't know anything about aviation. Reply and let me know what ratings you hold... If any.
N2369Z 5 months ago
@UnufcE YOU SIR ARE A FUCKING IDIOT! 760 mph is fast, faster than you will ever experience. Obviously the jet wasn't flying as fast as it can... Next time I put up a video I will be sure the jet is traveling at Vno to please you and your ignorant ass liberal fucking mind. I never asked you to come watch my video take your shit somewhere else.
N2369Z 5 months ago
i Not liking this Aircraft...
Floppy197 5 months ago
@UnufcE As delusional as your comment was ill try and interpret it.. your saying mach .99 is not fast...
N2369Z 5 months ago
@UnufcE ya just mach .99 no biggy.
N2369Z 5 months ago
I was there in the photography stand that day
augustyn1967 5 months ago
we americans can't design cars with any passion, but if its meant for killing then we poor our soul into it, god i love this plane
bmwandcadillacftw 5 months ago
@bmwandcadillacftw that would make you a terrorist.
thatmrdudeman 5 months ago
@bmwandcadillacftw great point ! that is really true ! the f-22 is some smooth death for sure.....one bad mo-fo !
mwupchurch 5 months ago
81 people don't have thrust vectoring
keljackson 5 months ago 79
@keljackson best comment ive seen in a while
N2369Z 5 months ago 10
@keljackson
Its 82.
eightway1 5 months ago
@keljackson lol its up to 92 people now
darkblaze176 1 month ago
@keljackson 92 People cant supercruise
dogfight001 1 month ago
@dogfight001 LOL
keljackson 1 month ago
i love both f22 and su37
lagunabad 5 months ago
ahh im going to go and play Ace Combat 6 now :)
keep your MW3 im getting ACE COMBAT ASSULT HORIZON :D
Cipher00007 6 months ago
Made In The USA.
nitro6080 6 months ago
ok for the people who say ALL I THINK OF IS STARSCREAM WHEN I SEE THIS are just newbs they dont really like it for what it is. if the transformers movie didnt come out they wouldnt give a dam about the f-22. i care for it because one of my uncles is in the air force and he specificly flys the f-22 raptor. im not tryin to dog on anyone here its just people dont care for it unless its on a popular movie
ShelbyGT500TT 6 months ago
@ShelbyGT500TT
Actually the REAL Starscream was an F-15 way back in 1985
LOL
ToonandBBfan 6 months ago
BEYOND THE F-22: The latest Editorial-Review published this April online at DOI: 10.1515/TJJ.2011.006, /April/2011 covers Jet-Steered [thrust vectored] vehicles beyond the F-22, namely: (1) The next-generation, super-agile, thrust vectored, stealth, tailless, manned and unmanned vehicles, (2) maximization of flight safety in preventing crashes by jet steering when conventional flight control fails.
1Bengalor 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Those dirty coward killers bombing defenseless Libyans day and night since 4 months !
NATO bombarding the conference of libyan bishops in Brega (view from far away)
watch?v=Hpy-psuDz6U
same killing of libyan Imams in Brega,Libya + destruction (arb. engl.subs)
watch?v=xTo9-pXIsuw libyan Girl wants no longer to be bombed by nato day and night and prefers to kill herself
watch?v=7KnHv0VNYqU&NR=1
refugees about NATO bombing: watch?v=tD_-zVadgNw&NR=1
edgar0001 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The f22 was built using Chuck Norris blood mixed into molten steel
war3hog1337 6 months ago
stop posting paragraphs on this video jeeeeeez
za10aj12 6 months ago
@za10aj12 I just cannot stand when I find a video I really liked and want to read all the comments and they are really long. It just really bothers me. The other day I was driving down the street and you will never guess what I saw but it was a car crash. Shortly afterward I went and got fuel for my car then went to work. It was a hot work day but overall went rather. Well. Oh by the way don't read long stuff if you don't want to.
zachattack83 6 months ago
The Vari-EZ in the front is more interesting.
hrc1966 7 months ago
I hate the fact they cannot pass the mach 1 barrier at airshows!!! Please give me a vid of the Raptor doing a fast pass at mach 2!
Firestoner46 7 months ago
price tag on this plane is enormous
cRaZy6362 7 months ago
Why wasn't he flying supersonic if its suppose to be a high speed pass ? Is it dangerous for people around ?
fabianromano 7 months ago
@fabianromano thats not high speed. :/ Lol thats actually pretty slow. Going supersonic is illegal in civilian-populated areas. Also it's illegal under several thousand feet in altitude.
theskitzoone 7 months ago
@theskitzoone haha yea I figured something like that. Thanks for the info
fabianromano 7 months ago
lol I was there :)
siryouareaterd 8 months ago
u jelly eurofags?
rusty5100 8 months ago 39
@rusty5100 lol, the mirage would pwn this shit.
seacuracao 5 months ago
@seacuracao wheres the proof bitch lolool fail
battingriver 4 months ago
@rusty5100
JAS 39 Gripen. You jelly tiny sweden can compete? :3
Come on fatty, don't take credit for sitting on your ass.
Andreazor 4 months ago
@rusty5100 no were not you bible thumping fat fuck :)
goreziad 4 months ago
@rusty5100 No. We have Eurofighter Typhoon bro', not this way too expensive shit.
Brokkolesz 4 months ago
@Brokkolesz
Which can't do much of what the F-22 can do, and barely more than the F-15 can.
EvilxMerlin 4 months ago
@EvilxMerlin Cool story bro'. Read some facts before you comment kid.
Brokkolesz 4 months ago
@Brokkolesz
Those are facts. Hell even with tranche 3, the Tiffy STILL doesn't have the capabilities of the F-15. As for costs... £125m or 199 million dollars per Tiffy (includes development costs)... F-22? $150 million per unit including development costs. Too expensive??? I recommend YOU go back and read up, Boy.
EvilxMerlin 4 months ago
@EvilxMerlin LOL You fucking motherfucking retard youtube troll.
Are you plain stupid fucking dumb or just trolling?
F22 costs fucking lot of millions due to fucking expensive maintanance.
Brokkolesz 4 months ago
@Brokkolesz
So does the Typhoon... your point? The Typhoon is more expensive per aircraft than the F-22. The Air Force warned that when the F-22 entered service it would be expensive to support for the first year to 18 months until units could manage the fighter properly. Costs for managing the F-22 are already down nearly 70% from where they were. Stop basing your idiocy on information you Bing'ed or Googled that is 3-4 years old. Fucktard.
EvilxMerlin 4 months ago 2
@EvilxMerlin Hi maintenance costs and lower numbers but much better tech didnt work for the Germans in WW2... just sayin.
implodingrat 4 months ago
@implodingrat
This isn't WW2. One Bone can do as much as a full squadron of B-17's could do, and be 1000x more accurate. Not to mention the real reason German lost the war was fighting in Russia and a total group of nutters in charge. The air war would have been much different if the Me 262 was in service like it was scheduled to be (1943) and the Luftwaffe run by Galland without interference...
EvilxMerlin 4 months ago
@rusty5100 no because the f-22 is a pile of shit.
PhotoShopChannel 4 months ago
@PhotoShopChannel Haha really, the F-22 is a pile of shit? Um no its actually probably the best fighter in the world. And probably the reason he said that was because on alot of videos of the U.S. military theres always some European trolls talking shit about our military, its annoying as fuck.
JBoY2214 3 months ago
@JBoY2214 /watch?v=KaoYz90giTk ...useless
PhotoShopChannel 3 months ago
Comment removed
Nucleariasi 3 months ago
@Nucleariasi U mad bro?
DoWorkNP 3 months ago
@Nucleariasi aww someones jelouse
M11ty 3 months ago
@rusty5100 xD
MrAlexHuff 3 months ago
All F-22's are currently grounded because there might be a problem with the pilot oxygen system which led to a crash in Alaska. Hopefully they can fix this issue and make them able to get back up soon. Once Lockheed Martin makes sure the oxygen system is safe, I hope Congress allows the USAF to buy more. Expensive but a good thing to have defend the lagre areas the United States has to cover.
kwmkc13 8 months ago
@kwmkc13 you're right, but unfortunately they probably won't buy more because of the F-35 program.
jdmess14hc 8 months ago
@jdmess14hc so they cancelled f22 production? that sucks. my cousin told me obama also recently cancelled f35 production. what gives? i mean come on. those 2 planes are the most technologicaly advanced planes in the world. i mean sure, they are friggin expensive but you have to think of the long term. you would only have to buy a few and you would have control of the skys for decades. you wouldnt have to upgrade them that often.
ACFriday6 7 months ago
@ACFriday6 Yeah the F22 was halted a few years ago I think that was the purpose of the F35...I didn't hear they cancelled that one though that would suck. and you're 100% right that's the whole point.
jdmess14hc 7 months ago
@ACFriday6 Oh I found it so they put the F-35B (USMC version) on hold until some issues are fixed, and the Navy and AF orders for the 35C and A may be cut in half for now I don't think there's anything conclusive thus far. They did talk about cancellation but they didn't go thru with it cuz it would cause a huge fighter gap in the arsenal.
jdmess14hc 7 months ago
Starscream!
GalenMarek20101 8 months ago
@GalenMarek20101 Starscream? Never heard of it.
336kgf 8 months ago
amazing how many f-22 experts there are in the world, oh gee wiz all of them are youtubing the f-22 at the same time gtfo!!! thats trippy
tweeterballer 9 months ago
@tweeterballer oh wow people are discussing the F-22 on an F-22 video. Shocking.
OlderG0ds 9 months ago 2
Think of it this way, if you had to choose to go into battle with a F-22 or a Su-27, which would you pick?
discobobify 9 months ago
@discobobify f 22
kirbyroxy 8 months ago
You people that say that other fighters are better are not being honest with yourselves. f 15s have been out for years and they still have a superb record. Let us face it, no one even got a kill on an f-15 yet more or less these raptors. Keep dreaming...
anointedsword 9 months ago
I love that sound. what a job.
adleraviation 9 months ago
Thats so fast it looks framey
Sinbadsmoking 10 months ago
Can`t compare to a SU35-37 not even in engine roar x)!
dragonfangalexander 10 months ago
Yet other countries are making copies of it lol
bobbyraejohnson 10 months ago
AMAZING!
yorappflash24 10 months ago
At first I thought these were a waste of money,but since China wants to step and play with the big boys I say we should invest in more....Ex Navy ,so I will always feel that they could have given the F14 an E,F,and G model.Miss the CATS.
marchdisco77 10 months ago
pft i can walk faster
classics07 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
There was little suprise that Typhoon, with its world-class agility and high off-boresight missile capability was able to dominate "Within Visual Range" flight, but the aircraft did cause a suprise by getting a radar lock on the F22 at a suprisingly long range. The F-22s cried off, claiming that they were "unstealthed" anyway, although the next day´s scheduled two vs. two BWR engagement was canceled, and "the USAF decided they didn´t want to play any more
ylad1999 11 months ago
@ylad1999 That's exactly what I've read (and I believe it's true). Do you have the source? I can't find it. BTW. I simply don't understand that some here claim the F22 is more manoeuvrable than the Thypon. It weighs 10 ton more and if that doesn't make is clumsy the stealth nonsense will. History repeats itself in that it's like the Phantoms vs the nimble Migs in Vietnam. It flies but it's too big. Same business with the F35 that I expect will be bagged ("too big to fall" or not).
hrc1966 7 months ago
fuck thats hot!!!!! i that wait to go to the air force
TheZooloo354 11 months ago
fuck thats hot!!!!! i that wait to go to the air force
TheZooloo354 11 months ago
@GranTurismo5Fan11 You're absolutely right my friend, there could never be proper replacements for either of the f-14 or the f-15, and frankly the hornet and the raptor get totally embarassed in the speed and range department by them, this is what we call a FAIL.
SuperCncguy 11 months ago
@SuperCncguy you know, apart from the supercruise, stealth and some othere abilities, the raptor is really an average fighterjet. I don't think it is bad, its just that it is made in a much more civilized way (thats why i dont like it :)) The thing is, it can do some really good things, it has fairly advanced avionics, making the job easier for the pilot for example. And information flow, the most important thing, is also quiet advanced. In terms of sheer performance, id choose something else.
mihailofsx 11 months ago
@mihailofsx the raptor bests every other aircraft in existence in terms of sheer performance...
matthewcardinals 11 months ago 39
@matthewcardinals Not true.
DSOXBLADE 9 months ago
@matthewcardinals
But you're wrong. It's useless and wildy expensive. So much so that the United States has stopped producing them. Why do you think we haven't used them in Iraq and Afghanistan?
@matthewcardinals
But you're wrong. It's a spending disaster and The U.S. has stopped manufacturing them.
dickbutt63 9 months ago
@matthewcardinals
watch?v=ei9oa5d2oNk
dickbutt63 9 months ago
@matthewcardinals
watch?v=27qdB1D0s9M&feature=related
dickbutt63 9 months ago
@dickbutt63 First let me start by saying how liberal and uninformed that video is. The F-22 Raptor is the best aircraft design ever created by a being with a human brain. Its actually limited by a computer to its maneuverability. Without that computer, the G forces would tear the pilot's spine from his body. No other aircraft, Russian or Chinese is capable of its ability. The F-22 was able to "shoot down" 20 F-15's before the F-15's even found it where it was. I can go on but I have no space.
matthewcardinals 9 months ago
@matthewcardinals
watch?v=27qdB1D0s9M
This video has Australian experts (Australians who were to purchase F-22's) call the raptor useless after war games which pitted f-22's along with f-18s against russian and chinese fighters. You never know what media to believe but I think it would be wise to research both sides of an argument before you mindlessly consume the propaganda the US shoves down your throat.
dickbutt63 9 months ago
@dickbutt63 The United State has never nor will never sell its F-22. You're thinking of the F-35. I have done my research. I am an aeronautical engineering major at the University of Arizona, while doing ROTC, and I plan on flying for the air force. The media I believe is called the Majors and Lieutenants of the United States air force, as well as majors are the demonstration squadron. The F-22, has capabilities and 70,000 lbs of thrust that is unmatch by anyone. Believe it.
matthewcardinals 9 months ago
@matthewcardinals
you will never fly. Also if it's unmatched by anyone why did the team the F-22 was on lose to the team with Russian Sukhoi's? Believe it.
dickbutt63 9 months ago
@dickbutt63 Dont be so sure little boy. I've already got hours up... They didn't lose. The SU-47 has lost in simulations to the F-22 already. Now, go comment on vevo videos about how much you hate their ads.
matthewcardinals 9 months ago
@matthewcardinals
Remember the part when I referenced outside sources and you just said, "no you're wrong no you're wrong." who is the little boy again? And you already have hours up? in what, a crop duster? Anyone can pay for flight lessons you weaselly little cunt.
dickbutt63 9 months ago
@dickbutt63 I don't know why you're so hostile all of the sudden. Your outside sources are pathetic. Australians talking about planes they've probably never seen fly over their skies and suddenly they're experts? Get real kid. Not anyone can pay for flight lessons. I'm sure a ghetto tough internet kid cant pay the $250+ per hour it costs to get lessons. 40 hours until a solo too. So, UMADBRO?
matthewcardinals 9 months ago
@matthewcardinals
Iaintevenmadbro
Here are some more sources for you. Still waiting on yours.
watch?v=Bf_6RPWmjGc&feature=related
watch?v=7RgjdnDBX4U&feature=fvwrel
dickbutt63 9 months ago
@dickbutt63 watch?v=-sL_q0rQe8c
Listen to the pilots themselves lol. Who says those sources are even backed up by reliable sources? Shya the F-22 cost $19,000 to maintain per flight hour, but it still does its job uncomparibly ;)
matthewcardinals 9 months ago
@matthewcardinals
The only advantage the F-22 has is electronics and radar. Sukhoi fighters are faster and more maneuverable. And as far as the pilots giving testament to how their planes are the best in the world, look at it this way: Imagine you work for Chevrolet. Secondly, imagine a reporter is asking you what motor company makes the best pick up trucks. What would you tell the reporter, regardless of facts?
dickbutt63 9 months ago
@dickbutt63 [Sukhoi fighters are faster and more maneuverable. And as far as the pilots giving testament to how their planes are the best in the world] That's a bunch of bullcrap. I can find many pilots from around the world that have said the F22 is top notch. . + add external stores to those Su's and see how they perform. W/ external stores they don't perform the same as what you see at airshows.
asusucks 9 months ago
@asusucks actually he's right re top speed su-27/35 has a faster top end due to design differences, stealth vs just speed. Some maneuvers maybe as well, but not all by a long shot. The 22 can't use all the thrust it has, would burn up the airframe!! Overall, European, not US, simulations have a 10-1 kill ratio in the 22's favor. not even close...
nwtruckerll 9 months ago
@nwtruckerll If that's the case then I bet his figures are when the aircraft are flying clean. As you know adding external stores creates drag which reduces speed and maneuverability. & as far as I know the USAF still has never released the top speed of the F22. If you have seen a USAF statement saying otherwise then I would appreciate a link to it. I have seen a release that it's been able to go I believe Mach 1.78 w/o AB.
asusucks 9 months ago
@asusucks the highest actually that the public knows is mack 2.2
kirbyroxy 8 months ago
@nwtruckerll u really think it would burn up the air frame
kirbyroxy 8 months ago
You're an idiot. Most infants that show any interest in aircraft know that there is NOTHING made that can come even remotely close to the F-22. Furthermore, you, and most "commoner-nobodys" like yourself will never know what this aircraft can actually do. Lastly, (ROFL!) if you think what you see at these "airshow" demonstrations" is anything close to this aircraft's true potential them you're actually as stupid as you sentence structuring indicates.
konakaine 9 months ago
@konakaine
"them you're actually as stupid as you sentence structuring indicates."
nice.
"airshow" demonstrations"
nice.
"commoner-nobodys"
nice.
For a grammar nazi, you sure don't know much about correct punctuation or spelling.
dickbutt63 9 months ago
ROFl! Got nothin to say about the topic at hand??
"L"
"nice."
konakaine 9 months ago
@konakaine
I'm not going to debate a dumbass. It's too exhausting.
dickbutt63 9 months ago
@matthewcardinals Really? I think the mig 25 is faster
moonscar119 9 months ago
@matthewcardinals no it doesnt :)
Dreadnought942 9 months ago
@matthewcardinals i dont know about that , the russians have vectoring thats more impressive than this
3habaneros 7 months ago
@matthewcardinals that's why it was canceled, lol that why only 40 percent of f-22 are not defected. that's why the f-22 f-35 and f-18 proved useless in pacific vision against sukhois?stealth due to computer aider design is myth, because inoder for the aircraft to see the enemy beyong visual range it must use it's own radars, immediately given it location. learn something /watch?v=27qdB1D0s9M&feature=related. US air superiorety is a fantacy. russian aircraft downed hundreds american in 20 m
alex080297 7 months ago
@alex080297 The plane was cancelled cuz it was supposed to fight the Soviet Union, which doesnt exist anymore. And 40% are defective because the plane has over 500,000 pieces in it, all which need to work perfectly. If one doesnt work the plane needs to go in for maintenance. Its part of having a plane. And lmao radar works with the shape of an aircraft. For the raptor to be detected it would physically have to change shape not use its own radar. Please research before you attempt to outsmart me
matthewcardinals 7 months ago
@matthewcardinals you clearly are not a good listener. I said only 40% ARE NOT DEFECTED. AND having something with so many parts is not reliable. I said when the raptor uses it's radar it is giving it's location right away. I don't need to research because i know what i am talking about, and i am not trying to outsmart you because we all are people and we are the same. I am only showing u the other side. personaly i like the pak fa more. I don't like this fighter the f-15 is my fav american
alex080297 7 months ago
@alex080297 Do you know how Radar works? You can not be detected for using radar. The shape needs to physically change. The F-22 has radar absorbing materials and the shape reflects the radar beams. Those never change so the aircraft will never be detected. Besides, a Raptors radar is so advanced that it would detect the enemy aircraft before its even in range of the enemy's radar. So even if it were to be able to be detected (which it isnt) it would shoot the enemy down before they even see it.
matthewcardinals 7 months ago
@matthewcardinals I too believe you are wrong on this one. Using radar means sending out radio waves thus giving away position. Secondly the Raptor and any other "stealth" can in some extent all be seen on radar. The echo may be small but radars can or will be able to see'm. Btw. I saw a story where the Raptor was supposed to show off against two Thypons who happened to spot it at long range. It might be a false but I don't trust stealth-tech. Radar development will make it useless.
hrc1966 7 months ago
@hrc1966 Radio waves dont give off position. Theyre forms of light. Not a material that reflects radar waves. And the F-22 has the radar signature of a steel marble, youre correct there. But to a bad guy scanning radar, a steel marble doesn't look like a fighter jet haha.
matthewcardinals 7 months ago
@matthewcardinals Oh yes they do. How do you think GPS works? Any radio wave emitted can be traced back to its sender! The F22 may have an absolute best cast signature of a marble which will render it stealth, but what about all the other angles? It's visible all right and radar improvements will catch up making the plane pretty useless. Mind you, the Chinese are stealing F35 secrets with both hands (was it several terrabyte they nicked?) and if radar signature information is leaked it is BAD!
hrc1966 7 months ago
@matthewcardinals too bad it doesn't have missiles to reach that distance. only aim-120 wich is mid range missile, russian missiles reach 120 and 160 km other awacs killer missiles are 400 km, and russian radars are more advanced then american. Also russian fighters have more then 1 radar unlike the f-22. russian fighters have rear radars as well
alex080297 7 months ago
@matthewcardinals It's not that the Raptor's radar is so advanced, which it is, but the Raptor is one of the first fighters to be "Netcentric equipped". The Raptor doesn't even have to turn on it's radar because AWACS will report target information to Raptor digitally, and so F-22 will be emitting for a minimum of time...the bare minimum. Netcentric warfare is the name of the game. Raptor and F-35 are new generation Netcentric warplanes. THAT's the difference.
JetMechMA 6 months ago
@matthewcardinals In USAF
BusinessKi11ER 5 months ago
@mihailofsx Agreed, I just have a hard time with a fighter aircraft that is supposed to proceed another but cant nearly match the speed. Besides, a fighter can do all sorts of crazy things...fine and dandy, but the fact is the PILOT can only take 9 g's. period.
SuperCncguy 11 months ago
@SuperCncguy im an f-16 crew chief and i can tell you since learning about the f-22 thru upgrade training and questioning the raptor crew chiefs, the f-22 is significantly faster then all current fighters that the u.s. military currently flys. would love to give you an exact top speed but it is still classified
EricG2122 11 months ago
@EricG2122 And I'm a former Jet engine mechanic who built GE F100's before the -110 changeover on F16's everyday and crawled in F15 intakes on the flight line with a scope and I can tell you #1 Their speed has been publicly released for some time now #2 while i WILL agree the government downplays a bit but the facts remain the F14&15's are much faster. The stealth nature and variable nozzle (what actually GIVES it its superior maneuverability hinder performance as far as top speed is concerned.
SuperCncguy 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@EricG2122 And I'm a former Jet engine mechanic who built GE F100's before the -110 changeover on F16's everyday and crawled in F15 intakes on the flight line with a scope and I can tell you #1 Their speed has been publicly released for some time now #2 while i WILL agree the government downplays a bit but the facts remain the F14&15's are much faster. The stealth nature and variable nozzle (what actually GIVES it its superior maneuverability hinder performance as far as top speed is concerned
SuperCncguy 10 months ago
@mihailofsx hahaha, it's funny how you say the F-22 is like every other fighter EXCEPT for everything that make it so much better, you contradict yourself.
TheSnivilous 11 months ago
@TheSnivilous Ok, lets get this straight! The F-22 is not like any other fighter jet! What it has that others dont have is: Advanced avionics and advanced stealth. What it makes it ordinary is performance in combat! In terms of ferry range (bearing in mind supercruise) F-22: 1,600 nmi; Su-27: 1 900 nmi; F-15: 3,000 nmi!!! Thrust/weight: F-22: 1.08; Su-27: 1.09; F-15: 1.12. Max rate of climb: F-22(classified); Su-27: 54,000 ft/min; F-15: 50,000 ft/min. SO: Range=SHIT. T/W=DISASTER. MRC: SHIT!
mihailofsx 11 months ago
@mihailofsx and while quoting stats for thrust:weight you're totally ignoring that the f-22 can go supersonic without the use of afterburners?
Nataku81 11 months ago
@Nataku81 Check my comments my friend, i mentioned "supercruise" a few times. Supercruise is the ability of the F-22 to maintain 1.3 Mach supersonic flight at an altitude of 35 000 ft without the use of afterburners. I believe this characteristic is an advantage, but it brings no good. Thats why I said, bearing in mind the supercuise ability, the F-22's range is still just 1600 nmi, much less then the F-15 for example. And the F-15's range is 3000 nmi.
mihailofsx 11 months ago
@mihailofsx yo the f22 is one of the worst fighters america has made... it has a major failure every 1.7 hours, it cant fly in rain, it needs repairs after every flight, and it took thirty years to make... and now it is canceld and not made anymore its shit
DrummingBonham 10 months ago
@DrummingBonham xD everything you said came out the mouth of rachel maddow lol you believe anything the news tells because the Air force association came out and laughed at the negative things said about the F 22 JUST LIKE I AM XD XD XD XD, what else did the news tell you to know today? ge learn real shit instead waiting sitting watching the news for bullshit twisted up stories, as soon as a news corporation buys a story they can legally change and broadcast it in anyway even if its wrong.
TH7596 10 months ago
@DrummingBonham early F-22's had penny size damage on the skin that had to be painted, the paint took a day and a half to dry or 3o hrs. it is still maintainence but you see how the news twisted that. also production was halted do to military budget cuts which had to do nothing with the F-22's performance which is excellent.
TH7596 10 months ago
@TH7596 no because the part where i said it has a major failure ever 1.7 hours is true. ive seen a video where the thing blew up while landing
DrummingBonham 10 months ago
@DrummingBonham xD that was the test flight stages
TH7596 10 months ago
@DrummingBonham i agree
F22 raptor is one of the worst aircraft
because it cant fly while raining, and it cost 2x larger than F15
thetrialshot 9 months ago
I have checked your channels and liked your videos very much. thats why i am going to subscribe you. Plz check mine videos and subscribe me if you like to.
faizi719 11 months ago
f22 raptor ftw.
Flaricus 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
that was pathetic, the f-22 is ****
edwardsweeney24 1 year ago
@edwardsweeney24 you're pathetic, you're ****
OlderG0ds 11 months ago
@OlderG0ds nooooo u are mate
edwardsweeney24 11 months ago
f22 is sick, all i think of when i see it is starscream. Thank you Michael Bay :D
vroomvroompartystata 1 year ago 30
@vroomvroompartystata boo starscream is a damn f-15
spyder1721 10 months ago
@vroomvroompartystata F@ck Michael Bay,Although its cool Starscream is an F-22,He looks like a damn tortilla chip in robot form
CyberdyneModelT101 7 months ago
@vroomvroompartystata For such a beast of an airplane, it is a shame how much of a bitch Starscream is...
knightimer2 7 months ago
the F-15 and F-14 are the best fighters ever !! :'( but we all miss the F-14
GranTurismo5Fan11 1 year ago
I got a boner watching this
nuggz503 1 year ago
nope f22 is amazing
eknirbknarf 1 year ago
the F15 is better
JonBob2391 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It will be difficult for anyone to equal this video....stunningly brilliant..... Absolutely perfectly matched music.
type on Google: "Patrick's Aviation / elegant bird"
thank
MAXOU10428 1 year ago
Very poor product , around 0:05 comes engine failure .
Vykuk123 1 year ago
@Vykuk123 lol wat??? thts just him putting on the afterburners
SquaidsIHave 1 year ago
@Vykuk123 i bet u have no clue about planes
SAPMixcraft92 1 year ago