Ha. im studying engineering, and 911 was definitely sketchy... cuz a STEEL FRAME of a skyscraper CANNOT MELT from jet fuel. If a steel frame melted, it would not have fallen so nicely. Look at buildings that are destroyed with tnt, it fell the same way.
@nomilkforsanta Gotta love liquidity, but still the pool of malten steel burnt for 2 weeks after they fell.. Id say something got it rediculisly hot, way hotter then fuel can burn for sure.
Okay Mr. Engineer. If you had passed your classes you would know that you dont have the melt the steel down to a liquidate form to take down the building. The steel was under a lot of pressure, remember the term load bearing form your classes. All you would have to do is degrade the steels integrity enough and it will fail. Jet fuel burning is enough heat to degrade the integrity. This is a silly argument used by conspiracy theorists.
@bugsta77 Jet fuel burned very quickly, it was the ignited material's sustained burning which caused the steel to weaken once it got heated into a plastic state and change its strength modulus, at which point it did not meet the design parameters. Once one floor collapsed on top of another, the weight and lack of structural integrity created an avalanche, and taking out each level as the added weight of each collapse separated the collapsing mass from the outer structure (box).
many will try to discredit a statement or neutralize it by shifting the attention away from whats being said. I apologize, i'm also capable of error...you see I'm human.
A comedy itself , a fight between darkness and light , talking to you is like talkin to a goat mmmmmmmmm
Hayamoto120 7 months ago
this is hillarious!is this from a parody movie?
sunlocdong 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this is hillarious!is this from a parody movie?
sunlocdong 1 year ago
Comment removed
sunlocdong 1 year ago
OMG this cracks me up every time I watch it.
gilliangirl1 1 year ago
Ha. im studying engineering, and 911 was definitely sketchy... cuz a STEEL FRAME of a skyscraper CANNOT MELT from jet fuel. If a steel frame melted, it would not have fallen so nicely. Look at buildings that are destroyed with tnt, it fell the same way.
ohhhshitty 2 years ago
steel does not need to melt to bend...re-take general chemistry and study thermodynamics.
nomilkforsanta 2 years ago 5
@nomilkforsanta Gotta love liquidity, but still the pool of malten steel burnt for 2 weeks after they fell.. Id say something got it rediculisly hot, way hotter then fuel can burn for sure.
11kungfu11 2 months ago
Okay Mr. Engineer. If you had passed your classes you would know that you dont have the melt the steel down to a liquidate form to take down the building. The steel was under a lot of pressure, remember the term load bearing form your classes. All you would have to do is degrade the steels integrity enough and it will fail. Jet fuel burning is enough heat to degrade the integrity. This is a silly argument used by conspiracy theorists.
bugsta77 2 years ago
@bugsta77 Jet fuel burned very quickly, it was the ignited material's sustained burning which caused the steel to weaken once it got heated into a plastic state and change its strength modulus, at which point it did not meet the design parameters. Once one floor collapsed on top of another, the weight and lack of structural integrity created an avalanche, and taking out each level as the added weight of each collapse separated the collapsing mass from the outer structure (box).
amramjose 4 months ago
@ohhhshitty
who said it melted?????? WHO SAID?
heres a building collapsing when the steel got hot enough that it weakened enough to lose its structural integrity
watch?v=A4aKQXJtBdE
taledarkside 1 year ago
:D.........
sygma707 2 years ago
Guys this is "fake news" its not real ok. Having said that the only thing I hate worse than hippies is terrorist supporting 9/11 truther fucks!
LiberalshateAmerica 2 years ago
Lmao, why would this "terrorist" guy be on there standing up for the terrorist? lmao, this is stupid.
WuNdAfRiEnD 2 years ago
@WuNdAfRiEnD You idiot it is a satirical news channel.
X46RAPTOR 1 year ago
Why wiuld they kill 3000 of their oen infedels?
Celler2 2 years ago
i do not think 9/11 was a conspiracy. terrorists are still to blame.
damn that was a quick telecast. He sure cut that conversation quickly!
ajdonabed 2 years ago
ehhh whoever knocked those buildings down are definitely terrorists
but im not so sure they are uneducated, towel wearing, "dune-coons".
Have you seen the wtc7 collapse?
theirs some obvious "fishyness" going on but nobody wants to question it..
shit, i dont blame them either...
too much pride, ego, and nationalism to sift through before you ever get to any real objective thoughts.
much luck to you brother.
Dont be afraid so speak your mind
peace
JueputaGuebon 2 years ago
wait
correction: theirs/ there's
many will try to discredit a statement or neutralize it by shifting the attention away from whats being said. I apologize, i'm also capable of error...you see I'm human.
JueputaGuebon 2 years ago
JG,
I see thanks! i agree with you
ajdonabed 2 years ago
Haha, "Me and Bush, we go out, we hang." That Al Qaeda dude was sort of funny.
CaptainAmerica322 2 years ago 4