Added: 4 years ago
From: Phlemmer
Views: 104,206
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (42)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I think the orbital crankshaft gears are too small. You need to add two more orbital crankshafts (turning at half speed) in order to double the size of all orbital crankshaft gears.

  • OH YEAH THIS IS THE MEXICAN WANKEL

  • i hate graphics.... you fake man...

  • i was confused about this engine until i saw this kaleidoscope. now im just dazed.

  • lol at you alternative fuel people. just build the gasoline engine better..like they are. ever seen a motorcycle?! power to weight ration is incredible! R6's are turning 26000 rpm. maybe if people didnt demand to have monster cars and 6 billion cup holders and crap we could have a line of cars simply driven by 1000cc bike engines.

  • @roycehellion

    Reciprocating piston engines are 37% efficient at "best". Average in a vehicle 20%. So, 75% of the energy in the tank is wasted. That says it all.

    In the MYT engine, all the main parts move only one way. A "great" improvement.

    The Chevy Volt was to have 100cc engine in a genny set. The car moves by electric motors only. Lotus have developed a two speed genny set engine for series hybrid.

    The rotary type engines are the way. They have to be well tested and cheap to make

  • @roycehellion

    wow that blew my mind. i had no idea my r6 runs at 26,000 rpms. unbelievable. dang, you gotta be the dumbest. your a joke. do you even know what rpm means?

  • Comment removed

  • I think the reason they're finding it difficult to bring this to the automotive market is because companies are looking towards electricity not fossil fuels. Electric motors are by far superior in terms of Power to Weight ratio the only downside of them at this time is the batteries used to power them. Companies would rather invest in these electrically powered systems than steadily use up the worlds fossil fuels. Also its cleaner and will likely stay in use far into the future.

  • electric motors are HEAVY. there is no way they are superior in terms of power/weight.

    this myt engine is easily 20:1 p/w ratio.

    these companies are completely stupid if they are still going the battery/electric route.

    now HYDROGEN and electric would be something worth looking into if the myt engine wasn't considered.

    my vote is a myt/electric hybrid.

    superior power, superior efficiency.

  • like a Hydroxy fuel.

    your right that would be awesome

  • amen prech it i totoley agree youer right on there

  • @mastariffa

    Electric motors power/weight ratio is vastly superior an IC engine. A MYT series hybrid is the way.

  • @oasiac

    most likley electricty will end up using more fossil fuels to create it. to build the power plant and to store. them der big ol batteries get old and need changing to. getting rid of batteries is not environmental friendly at all. no matter what as of now, we will depend on oil. no way around it.

  • HHO. I bet this will run off of one huge hho cell with dual batteries and dual alternators,...that is if it isnt'' bull$hit. With the world coming to and end and all, you would think the tech revolution bubble makers would be all over this.

  • So when it is proven will you shut up and grow your hair.....Jackass

  • website has an update:

    Announcement: Thank you for waiting. The MYT Engine finally coming. Please stand by

  • The whole engine is a heat sink. Look at it's design. The internal friction is so low that air cooling is all it needs besides the Bio-diesel

    natural lubricating/cooling effects.

    Friction is heat....

    Reduce friction=reduce heat

    I feel this design is very usable. Time will tell

  • I would insulate the engine. The only reason we cool engines is to make the intake and compression stroke easier and to prevent excessive damage. But with direct injection and lean burn technology solves the damage, and the compression and combustion take place in seperate sections in rotary engines like this. It would increase thermal efficiency, especially since this does not have substantial friction losses(or heat losses should it be insulated) it would be close to perfect thermal efficiency

  • yup add a water jacket for cabin heat

  • @bmfoshizzle

    lean burn is hotter

  • How do you cool 16 fires a Cylinder rotaion?? I'm a student at Engine city and was browsing engines and came across this. Just wonderin'

  • my thoughts exactly charles...there will have to be either a different design, or very expensive materials involved.

    good design, but if you cant cool it down it turns into a claymore mine. a really really big one.

  • eheheh... we had the banger...

    now we have the slapper... lol

    stop this nonsense... allow HHO to evolve

    work on the corrosion prevention of a water fueled combustion engine.. pa-leeeeeease

  • HHO is an extreme waste of time. For fun, I installed a system onto my car, and the fuel mileage didn't change at all, and neither did my engine run any hotter or colder. All it did was waste space.

  • some engines ... if completely stock don't benefit from this.

    in my cars engine . for instance... i supose its because of a defective sensor, the computer leans out the mixture so bad... so i get bad performance vibration, damage the engine and i get no economy.

    same model same year same engine in another car could produce clear results

    That goes to electronic fuel injected cars

    ALL the carbured engines will benefit from this.

    they all easily 2 to 5% CO emission +awfull smoky exaust smell

  • yes and no for me , i put one jar on my

    91rs305 camero . IT DID clean up my combustion chambers...but i could have done this with 50% e85..

  • Hmmm, a catch up clutch huh ?,,yeah it will loose momentum.

  • A Compressed air throttled I.C.E..........Hmmmmm.

  • Update: I'm not an engineer. A real engineer would have the ports on the housing lined up properly by now. I've abandoned combustion in favor of compressed air, steam, etc.

    I wish Angel Labs the best of luck. They're going to need it.

  • Phlemmer, your use of compressed air is the ONLY way that this engine can be run. Even then, it's going to have a lot of blow-by and wear. Unfortunately, Angel Labs has probably raised some funding from investors without being able to offer them any return on their money.

    There are at least 50+ decent advanced engine technologies that I'm aware of in development today. The MYT isn't among them.

  • A qualified engineer from California, whom has shown his credentials previously, posted in this guys forum the technical reasons of why this engine wouldn't work. The forum was shutdown 2 days after and the website remains without updating since 2006. :pppp

  • I'm not a mechanic or engineer...but even I can see that this engine has problems with lubrication and sealing the combustion chambers. I mean where is the cooling system? Interesting concept and project. Besides a proper High performance V8 will chuck out 600-700 BHP if highly tuned not 350 !

  • Update on my model:

    I've found that reducing the offset of the crank pins from the full planet gear radius to 3/4 the radius removes the retrogade motion of the vanes.

  • The engine doesn't work, plain and simple. This is a case of an inventor coming into an already crowed field (Bullington rotaries), and making claims that the technology can't begin to live up to. This "engine" can't even handle combustion due to the impossibility of sealing and lubricating a combustion chamber with 4 parting lines, of which 3 move relative to each other. Many other problems as well, with the worst being excessive heat retention.

  • Thank you for pointing me to the name "Bullington", which I hadn't seen before. There is a patent (1568053, filed 1926) that almost exactly matches this mechanism.

    From the model I have made, I can see numerous problems with the design as an ICE. If I hadn't made the model, I wouldn't have found those problems.

  • No problem. Many of the 28 patents listed on the MYT patent are very similar also. I'm sure this design infringes several that came before it.

  • Depends on the claims, it could be an improvement. (legal theft)

  • so you reckon this bit on the MYT website is a tad far fetched? hehe

    The MYT (Massive Yet Tiny) Engine, is a breakthrough of immense proportions that will spawn the next industrial revolution and will rocket the internal

    combustion engine into the next millennium. Please spread the word.

  • This technology has gone nowhere because it's claims are complete fabrications. They can't even run the engine under combustion but only on air.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more