Added: 4 years ago
From: davidorban
Views: 59,646
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (268)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • what an interview. lol

  • This is one "hilarious" video. =p

  • What a pathetic stupid interviewer. A younger Jhon Nash would just walk away from such idiotic questions.

  • Your video is a favorite on Paramaribo

    

  • This video is about some interviewer trying to put words in Nash's mouth.

  • omg...  is this guy rly teaching prof. Nash how watter boiles?

  • I dont think that shizofrenia is a real illness because all people can be angry sometimes.

  • @19whitepower are you dumb or stupid? I'm wondering because your comment has to be one of the most ignorant statements I've ever read.

  • @19whitepower ... schizophrenia had nothing to do with being angry...

    are you for real?

  • i just watched Beautiful mind ... i've spend 30 minutes just looking up John Nash and learning more about him, in those 30 mins spent ive grown not only respect but admiration for the man ...

    this is why i have to say this WHAT THE EFF IS THAT INTERVIEWER EVEN SAYING!?!?! its like 'economony, another example technology difusion i cant talk english correct' ... WTF IS WRONG WITH HIM ... the interviewer seems to be the one in need of a movie ... should name it 'THE DUMBASS MIND'

  • @omegamik20 Or they could call it "An ugly mind". It would just be him sitting around trying to do some basic arithmetic and thinking of stupid questions to ask nobel prize winning mathematicians.

  • @Maca2199 HAHAHA yeah true that.. should have a sequel of him going back to the 1st grade and learning how to talk.. like another Forest Gump movie except it doesn't end so well .

    p.s- okay now going too far LOL

  • this interviewer is pissing me off. I learned nothing relevant from this and was a waste of everyone's time except this asshole.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Note to the interviewer: One does NOT, under ANY circumstance, interrupt John Nash.

  • Who is this IDIOT questioning John Nash? This interview accomplishes absolutely nothing due to the interviewer being rude, incompetent and arrogant! John Nash should have gotten up and walked way!

  • I couldn't understand anything that guy interviewing Dr. John Nash said. Maybe this quote by Einstein explains why. Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction.

  • @ohshutup100

    Because you said "All he *did* you silly boy" .

    And by this statement you were implying that the interviwer had an agenda to try and oust Nash.

    I have stated that the interviewer quite clearly changed the direction of the question as logical progression.

    If the above statement I have made is incorrect please provide further details of you previos statement "All he *did* you silly boy"

  • @ohshutup100

    Unfortunately you probably did not understand this interview.

  • @di55ection

    The interviewer is a physicist and computer scientist that has does research into energy modelling and has put a question of universal application.

    Pure mathematcial logic is not always compatible with modelling due to preconceived notions of constants.

  • dude.. first of all you are talking with 90 year old guy, he barely understood your question. I barely understood your question; there was no question. Nothing changed his mind, you just seemed to talk to yourself.. u are asking questions imposed with your own opinion wanting to be confirmed by a Nobel laureate. If you want to draw an opinion from another person, ask a Question, not an answer with question mark.

  • @doockey1

    The question that the interviewer asked were logical and based the language of physics and mathematics.

    The idea of static universe is illogical.

    Every atom in the universe is present of constant change there is no such thing as absolute space nor absolute time.

  • It amaze me how people call "complex" something they don't understand, complexity is something that can not be explain, therefor not definable, if it's not definable is not real, the truth have the quality of being simple, evident and explainable.

    This poor man suffer from a debilitating illness, the only people that took his theories seriously were people too embarrass to admit they did not understand his arguments, and now you can see the results.

  • It amaze me how people call "complex" something they don't understand, complexity is something that can not be explain, therefor not definable, if it's not definable is not real, the truth have the quality of being simple, evident and explainable.

    This poor man suffer from

  • I think John Nash's views on change is that change never changes, it just shows itself in other ways. Whether it's forward or backwards. We're all humans, and we are subject to humen nature, which is just a steady cycle of hatred, greed, and failure. There can never be real change, but there is only the option for slight progess, but the rate always stays the same because of that. A thousand years from now we'll be cavemen again. Also, like my comment if u think the interviewer's accent is fake.

  • big fat blind huy talking bullshit

  • ASk the fucking question you douche!

  • I believe the interviewer is a wannabee he should throw his question out there and let the old genius go with it, it appears hes one of those assholes that likes to ask his questions and then answer them too.

  • @TheDocdolittle

    The interviewer is physicist and computer scientist that does understand the question he is putting forward. He had to change the position of the question so that nash could understand the the question.

  • John Nash to me is just a regular psychic who did some spy work and was not understood by general people. His thinking is too complex. I believe he does not have any mental illness until maybe the mental ward would give him great fear. Mental wards are like concentration camps.

  • The interviewer is translating from another language with 14 questions he tried to put into a question.

  • THE INTERVIEWER IS BOOAAAARING!

  • Comment removed

  • Was the interviewer really just talking about ranking email by relevance? Get out of here, if he sent me an email it would be ranked as spam.

  • I am truly shocked that the interviewer so aggressively spoke over Dr. Nash... The questions were terrible and pointless. "The rate of change itself has seemed to increase"--- and you had to explain what that means!! And you explained it poorly. Hello buddy, this guy is a mathematician. Rate of change of rate of change is the second derivative of a function. I'm pretty sure Nash needed no explanation.

    You essentially just used his name, and this interview, to get people to hear YOUR voice.

  • @CrackHeadForLife420

    The interviewer does not need Nash to forward his own research.

    The interviewers question was simple and elegant and adapted the question so that there was no misunderstanding.

    Unfortunately most of the closed minded people here do not understand this interview.

    The interviewer was not trying to get one over on Nash. There was some misunderstanding with the questions so the interview adapted the questions.

  • What a tool. He used his time with Mr Nash basicly to babble on about what for the most part is common since, and at no time seeking any real info from Mr Nash. He could of got the same result setting at home talking to him monotor and just putting Nashs name in his title. Sad and almost as pathetic as my grammer. Learn some respect aswell and dont talk over someone trying to answer your paragraph of nothingness.

  • people are being a bit harsh on the interviewer - it seems more like an attempt at a conversation? The interviewer is talking of accelerating change with tech and Dr. Nash is like why the fuck are you asking me this?

  • you all might well be brilliant but your camera work is terribly poor and sophomoric very uneducated camera person

  • Love the look Dr Nash gives the guy, trying to teach your Nobel Prize winning doctor something shows that maybe you are the true delusional one. I think his look changed due to the fact he realised you are an absolute fool not worthy of his time

  • faggot, youre not smarter than john nash, fat asshole

  • the interviewer is a piece of shit!!!

  • the interviewer is a piece of shit!!!

  • He looks enthralled.

  • that last minute in the interview makes the video worth listening to.

  • I wanted to visit the university cause i hear nash still chills around, and i wanted to ask him personally what he thought about the new world order, and the world elite enslaving us all. But i had no particular question about math, but i sure did want to see if he is willing to respond to some questions on the question of a "single world government" erected through regional trade pacts a la European Union.

  • John Nash is hella ready to go to the crib and chill back...

  • I belive that things never change in their essence, only their forms change.Every thing that was and will be, we have them in present.Human nature never changed and never will change.

  • @andeyrock Thanks, I collect platitudes.

  • interviewer is too straight forward,thats y they call him fool

  • He looks really bored ><

  • interviewer absolutely fool

  • do you really want his oppinion or you just wanted to teach something to the man ?

    who do you think you are sir ?!!

  • The interview should have read his questions from a piece of paper. This would have helped him avoid the pitfall of looking like an idiot. But this was not the case...

  • interviewer is an idiot lol, talking to nash like he is a child

  • @AtomicSnoCat

    The interviewer did not talk to Mr Nash like he was a child.

    The interviewer was talking in such a tone so that Mr Nash would understand the direction of the question.

    There was misunderstanding occurring at the start of the interview. and as such the interviewer had to adjust accordingly.

  • The accomplishments of John Nash never cease, he can now say he has been interviewed by the King of all Douchebags.

  • You, interviewer, are not worthy to talk to John Nash in such a condecending tone. Period.

  • @seanhy7

    That was not a condescending tone by the interviewer.

    It was an excellent conversation. Mr Nash did struggle to understand the direction of the question. But for an 82 yr he still in the game(no pun intended).

  • WTF? haha poor Mr Nash. he`s thinking to himself "here is 10 min. of my life I`m not getting back...get me out of here, this guy(interviewer) is a jackass"

  • @sled1950 A broken genius interviewed by Art Bell. What a waste.

  • the interviewer is disrespectful and childish, you suppose to liston, not talk the whole interview, when you are asking a wise man. People are interresting what nash is saying, not him.

  • This is an example of someone agreeing with someone after realising he is talking to an idiot who isn't listening. It's a way of shutting the idiot up.

  • god this guy is fucking annoying

  • Agreed. This is a bad interview. Not good when you talk more than your guest and also interrupt him several times. 

  • There is too much talking from the "interviewer" off screen. Does he like hearing himself speak? Let the man speak. A conversation is just that, a dialogue between two people. A whole minute to introduce the question? Form your question, then open your mouth. Either that or get out of the way. It's unfair to the interview subject.

  • Certainly, you have not changed Nash's mind by bringing up an example from Physics, a subject in which clear rules and laws are far more prevalent than in something like human interaction or society, not to mention "change". Nash, of all people, probably has one of the clearest understandings of how scientific laws, rational behaviour, etc are not, or only with great care, to be compared to human emotions and feelings associated with change.

  • What the hell is WRONG with this interviewer... seriously.. Trying to ask difficult questions is no sign of intelligence... Intelligent people make things easy.

  • there is nothing new under the sun ...except advaced control of the profane masses as we delve deeper into the cybernetic cultural revolution....engineered..to bring in the new world order...

    most people live their whole lives asleep...

    the interviewer is totally indoctrinated and Nash has no clue..

    a brilliant man who was used by the "system"..macy group

  • the only thing in which am very disappointed is that people started acknowledging him after they saw the movie not 1 of you writing comments here knew this man even existed

  • @ashman9992 Does anybody know anything until they hear of it for the first time? What's your point?

  • @ashman9992 i did

  • Nash: (...) a king is overthrown

    Interviewer: or a monarchy becomes a democracy

  • Wow jmac281...you hit the nail right on the head. How as an interviewer are you going to ask 83 very VERY long winded questions and expect to get an answer? What a moron.

  • omg the interviewer is boring

  • WTf is wrong with this guy??? this interviewer honestly made me fall asleep im surprised nash could stay awake it was like death. its like just ask your question and get the hell out of there

  • I feel like strangling this interviewer.

  • I'm surprised .... I think Nash used "balance" because the other would give a slap in the face of this idiot.

    Viva Nash, my idol!

    Eu estou surpresa.... Acho que Nash usou "equilíbrio", pois outro daria um tapa na cara deste idiota.

    Viva Nash, meu ídolo!

  • 0:00-1:19 First question

  • Author, you are an asswhole.

  • let the man speak...-.-

  • I'm surprised at how genuinely nice John Nash is. As a troubled genius, I would have expected him to be somewhat more irritable. He has nothing to prove, yet he sits and listens to this moron, even attempting to give meaningful and insightful answers to his pseudo-intellectual questions/ramblings despite this idiot's astonishing attempts to interrupt him mid-sentence.

    Three cheers for John Nash. A true hero of our time.

  • 'it's essentially a telegraph'... you can feel the contempt.

  • Even thou the interviewer is asking random questions, John Nash is able 2 deal with him because of game theory, sometimes the luck of the draw gets u a moron asking random questions (you have 2 take the good with the bad)!!

  • nash is actually laughing from inside listening this dumb ass question .....hehe

  • this interviewer makes nash problematic because of stupid questions.. he irationalize!!!

  • he speak a lot

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • nash's answers I think regarding stability under fiat... and foreign influence on the US macro economy have since proven to be correct... the fiat issues spread further afield... but I think he was mostly right that the US economy is no longer the unstable anchor of world economy... other nations are anchoring their economies... so the sudden failure of banking did in fact illicit an immediate reaction of forcing stability worldwide.

  • I don't think the man is understanding the quiestions fully. Bit of a language barrier.

  • "Economical" terms!!!! ... this guy has no idea of what English means ... in particular what economical (which different of economic) means ... :))))

  • this isn't an interview, this is some random retard who can't stop talking and cotinually interrupts one of the great minds of the 21th century

  • Listen I respect everyones hate on the interviewer and his possible irrational thought. But you have to give him a hand for his effort to change Nash's views on qualitative change through Physics Laws. Good attempt, anyone got any abstract views, if not then dont say bad things.

    To be honest no one will impress Nash, but we can attempt to challenge him!

    Game Theory has enlightened Economic thought, well done Nash!

  • What an idiot interviewer, asking questions about things he knows nothing of, and attempting to pass off a stupid physical analogy as something of intellectual value - not a bad effort on games john, but I'll get a nobel with my "water on the boil" theory - how irritating for nash!!!

  • He does NOT have a degenerative brain disease. He was once subjected to Paranoid Schizophrenia. For 25 years he suffered with it. Schizophrenia deserts its victims in most cases with age.. The reason he speaks as he does, as with most geniuses, is that most do not function on a plane as a normal person does.. If you have ever known a true genius most are "Weird" in their own way.. They are essentially disconnected in several ways from the world around them and the people as well.

  • Comment removed

  • What's the point of this? The guy has a degernative brain disease, it's amazing he can still talk even. It was amazing 30 years ago,even. For crying out loud, leave him alone. He just tries to pretend to be normal from time to time for his own sake, don't expect him to be intelligent or make sense or anything. Despite the movies claim, he's not even on any psychiatric drugs.

  • Nash is still an active researcher. Schizophrenia can be very debilitating, but it's not always degenerative; it can be degenerative, or have a "peak" and then stabilize.

    The reason he seems "out of it" is because one of the effects is losing the ability to display and read facial expression properly. Also extreme social anxiety, etc. -- Think of mumbling like an idiot when you're nervous around a pretty girl.

  • Also, as for "leave him alone". nobody's bothering him!

    ever consider that maybe it makes him feel good to share his experience and keep being a productive member of society, instead of becoming a recluse and living like a vegetable?

    You wouldn't ask Hawking to be "left alone" like he's some useless spectacle just because he has his affliction. Mental disorders are no different; they are debilitating, but do you expect him to just give up on life and what he loves? - that's the easy way out.

  • Ok i take back the mean stuff I said before: this whole video is redeemed by the random religious orthodox Jew in it: check out the beard and Yarmulke [skull cap] at 7:59 !! Jewish Pride!

  • Very humble of him to put up with this guy. I, for one, consider myself to be very humble, but i would just slap the !@#$ out of this interviewer. 'an email is even faster than a telegraph' 'well, they are essentially the same' LOL

  • this interviewer is a dumbass, he thinks he's smarter than his subject

  • @jmac281 You are totaly right my friend. He certanly is an idiot. I may not know as good as profesor Nash nor even as that little smartypants but he certanly behaves unrespectfully with a Nobel Prize Laureat.

  • @jmac281 I rarely give thumbs up or down to Highest Rated Comments but in this case I make an exception.

  • @jmac281 agreed....a crap interviewrs..Damm he wanted to put all the words from his own mouth..trying to sow he knows quite alot about this subject..then Ehy getting answers from Nash..

    and Jhon Nash looked bit annoyed..

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Very intresting series of videos. Good job David!

  • I found a formula to find the rate of increase in regards to the probability of stocks by use of integration and linear algebra.

  • the interviewer is a rookie

  • you ask him a question ,let him answer

    idiot

  • My gratitude is sent to Professor Nash. He is my idol in Mathematics and my inspiration in Economics

  • John Nash is a brilliant man who doesn't deserve to have his time wasted with idiotic questions coming from someone no smarter than a fance post. He has, unfortunately, lost many years due to his schizophrenia and hopes to catch up somehow.

  • idiot interviewer, what a waste of time

  • Many young people like this gentlemen interviewing Professor Nash are so full of pride and ego when it comes to intellect. Its so obvious he is not listening to What Dr. Nash has to offer for quite a bit of this interview. He is trying so hard to impress the man, without realizing how he is making full of himself. This is where Dr. Nash surpasses the great intellect itself. The experiences of life gave him calmness composure and freedom to breathe wisdom through his being. Cheers

  • Maybe he was nervous. Trying to impress someone like Nash could get you all excited and nervous.

    Nash is a humble man who contributed alot to this society. He could care less on who the hell interviewer is.

  • @ObeeLektro

    The interviewer is not trying to impress he is a physicist and computer scientist who has excelled in the field of energy modelling and does not have a large ego.

    He was not trying to catch our nash. All he done was change the position of the question so that nash could understand the question.

  • i am no math man or anything but i have respect to this man so much.

    and i truly think this interviwer wants brag his vocs and show he is smart but he forgot one important thing.. Nash is there

  • well john nash didn't express himself very clearly or answer the questions directly. of course, most mathematical genius's are more or less introverted.

  • this guys a straight retard (th einterviewer), they werent on the same wavelength at all he made no fuckin sense

  • I don't see who interviews whom?

    The intreview is PITA, actually an idiot PITA

  • excelent point.

    John Nash points out that email is simply a return to telegraph with the change of individual usership.

  • lol poor old man is like "is this guy for real" lol

  • way to annoy an old man. Dr. Nash has a very expressive face and you can practically read the words "Get out of my face you idiot" across his forehead.

    What was the point? oh well, I met John Nash too once on Princeton Campus and annoyed and frightened him with some idiotic questions of my own. but at least i didnt post it on youtube.

    but thanks anyway. very entertaining.

  • The interviewer should accelerate putting a bullet in his brain for asking obliviously obvious questions which are primarly not open ended or statements that sound like he is just reaffirming his own ideas, and lacks lessons in being concise. What..a..nerdy..tool.

  • Ink on paper, 12 BC - 20th C. Typewriter, 1870 - 1980's. Word processor 1980's. Speech recognition, recent.

    Instruments only for 100's of years / Gramaphone / LP's / Cassette / CD / mp3.

    Where's my Hover Car?

  • He knows it's bullshit. :D

  • When Nash got the laureate, he said that he don't think that he invented something new, he just added his opinion to what was already invented. But his opinion changed a lot...

  • looool . This man in the interview is making fun of himself. The old man knows that your questions are non sense.

  • a lot more energy is needed for water to go from 95 to 105 then from 85 to 95

  • Let him talk u fucking bitch!!! Nash should just smack that fool!

  • haha, spot on.

  • sure enough..

  • In the not too distant future, interviews will accelerate and be quicker, you will also be able to reach your hand through the monitor to slap the interviewer.

  • HAHAHA! Great one!

  • @Yimmery hahaha...don't we all hope so !

  • john nash is a genius.

    this guy isint

  • wtf is this about - Nash looks bored and half asleep - why is he bothering - why am i bothering??

  • Way to suprise a man who is way past his primed and disorderd..... using esoteric terminology to a man who has auditory deficits.... this is fair...

  • I wish Nash would have turned into the Hulk and torn that ass apart!

  • I met Nash in Berkeley when he was a long haired homeless and asked me for a quarter. I bought him a cup of coffee and he wrote my thesis on A.I. in 1/2 hour.

    I got an A..

  • not an A+ ?

  • Geez!!!

  • john nash must be thinking.. "bitch i wrote my thesis before you were a fetus.." , fucking idiot indeed..

  • This interviewer is a fucking dumbass... all he's doing is trying to sound smart trying to use the biggest words to look smarter than john nash.... how long did it take him to think about these ridiculous questions ?? fucking idiot

  • that interviewer is a clueless dick. Who's he to lecture a recognised genius??

  • qualitive change, that's the "key":

  • The game is always changing the rules are always changing!!!!

  • emails are not a telegraph, any can get on anyone network or computer and send out an email!!!! PERIOD!!! It's the truth!!!!!

  • Were living in "SEASONS IN THE ABYSS"!!

  • i've seen it before... He's not actually crazy just very smart.... It's like a short film or a fucking movie!!!

  • I ran across the old bird!!!! Have you ever been to Guttenberg Museum, you ever been to Mainz!!!!

  • Quit hemming him up you cowards. I'm not running you fuck with me!!!

  • The interviewer has not clue what he is saying, he says the same thing 10 times, but with different wording..fucking idiot. John Nash can't even understand cause the interviewer makes no sense.

  • Who is the Idiot interviewing John Nash?. Fire the guy who hired the interviewer. What a joke, this dude is a Joke, trying so hard to be smart. Very funny.

  • wow... so bad....

  • Is the interview reading the question phonetically off a board. Disgraceful, the interviewer is just making it up as he goes along. He shouldn't have been allowed to talk, let alone stand, near Nash.

    Nash has a pain in his ass standing talking to this idiot. Raise of eyes to heaven at 3.26.

    Why is this embarassing scene on youtube?

    The interviewer makes an amazing discovery at 4.20, the 'internet,' we can trnasfer information simaltaneously, wow!!!!!!!!!!!

  • I think everyone here agrees with the opinion that this interview was humiliation....Nothing more to add.

  • I love how you are trying so hard to sound smart, you made yourself look like a jackass, with no respect for john nash. douche bag

  • wht a douche... respect nash motherfucker