Added: 5 years ago
From: rboman75
Views: 34,558
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (9)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • To break a virtual engine in a computer simulation is cheaper than to break a real one. Consequently, simulations may be used to avoid some bad designs. Finally the number of "real tests" should be reduced thanks to the numerical simulation results.

  • just because the failure of a fem model is less expensive than the failure of a real engine :)

  • such kind of simulation is extremely hard to perform, however, I do not see any reasons to do it... since all engines must be tested on the bird strike in reality

  • What time interval is this and what rpm is rotating?

  • They showed a real life simulation of losing a blade in a Discovery show about the A380. The whole challenge was to keep the parts inside the engine from getting out because the engine basically exploded. And they said that it is something that happens once in a while.

  • Oh snap, thats a lot of damage from one blade.

  • @SlavaVB: When I and my high school physics class visited a turbine manufacturer (MTU, now part of Siemens) they showed us an actual blade that broke and then went through the housing of the power generator and then through the roof of the powerplant. That blade was found some 400 meters away from the generator, dug deep into a nearby crop field. These turbine blades have a lot of kinetic energy, for sure.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more