It was a loose fibre optic connection apparently, and once it was fixed everything went back to observing the laws of physics, haha. I just read that the other day.
@jtathaizzosh try rereading your source or reading a source worth reading
quote:
"But the team also said they found a problem in the optical fibre connection between the GPS signal and the experiment's main clock - quite simply, a cable not quite fully plugged in.
In contrast, the team said that effect would increase the neutrinos' apparent speed."
bbc report.
the problem seems to be in their timing method not the fibre optic connection.
@advers1078 So a loose cable increased the apparent speed of the neutrinos, that is exactly what I said... P.S. I never claimed to be the world's foremost expert in the area, cool your jets.
@jtathaizzosh once the loose/damaged cable is plugged in well it would increase the speed of the neutrinos not reduce it. The fibre optic cable was a connection between the GPS satellite signal and the main clock, if its not plugged in full the data is reduced not increased and as such the main clock would be slightly off; I just hate when people put the effort to read the news and yet somehow be able to miss inform tht's all & like I initially said the problem is most likely in the timing gear
just a theroy but these particles are smaller than atoms there passing between them hence yes they will go faster because there is nothing to stop them... so light being a certain atom size and things being bigger than the atom of light light atoms are hitting other attoms in the vacuum of space aka dust etc and it maxes the speed out.. just a thought
SIGNS OF JESUS COMING:DAMASCUS,SYRIA-WILL BE DESTROYED(ISAIAH 17:1),EGYPT(ISAIAH 19:1),ISRAEL-DIVIDED(JOEL 3:1-2),WARS-IRAN’PERSIA’(EZEKIEL 38-39,PSALMS 83), EARTHQUAKES(MATT.24),¬MYSTERIOUS DEATH OF ANIMALS(HOSEA 4:3),GLOBAL STRANGE SOUNDS(JEREMIAH 25:31).IT’S FRIGHTENING FOR THOSE WHO DON’T KNOW THE TRUTH.HELL IS REAL!WWIII,MEGA EARTHQUAKE?–RAPTURE (1THESSALONIANS 4:17)-ABOUT TO HAPPEN--ONLY THE HOLY ONES WILL SEE THE KINGDOM OF GOD.REPENT!READ THE BIBLE.GET IN THE ARK NOW!JESUS IS COMING!
I heard that they redid the calculations and found that there was no faster than light travel after accounting for the fact that the particles were traveling in a non-uniform gravitational field.
so his ultimate conclusion was that the neutrinos took a shortcut through some sort of dimentional space? & then you have people saying that it was wrong the whole time because of gps? even if it was gps that failed, the distance reference should back that up but it doesn't, no - neutrino's & light moved much faster at the start of our universe, this has been observed, it's only natural to conclude that if cern was creating conditions like of that after the big bang then maybe they succeeded?
Their text scenario is stupid, if the neutrino is faster than the speed of light, then that means Einstein was wrong. So their text message lottery situation shouldn't take into account relativity. Bunch of idiots.
Tesla vs. Edison, Tesla won! Tesla vs. Marconi, Tesla won! In 21 century Tesla vs Einstein, and will we see who will won. Tesla said that the particles faster than light. CERN in 2011 is confirmed! Quantum Physics is sucks!
Key of universe are with me and future is my - Nikola Tesla
things being relative when a object traveling at more than half the speed of light passes me and I'm on an object travelling also slightly more than half the speed of light in the opposite direction the first object passes me at more than the speed of light, right??
@frost1947 nope, see the 'Twin paradox' it has to do with Newtonian mechanics, only the twin that has undergone acceleration will have its clock ticking slower and will stay young.
Light is, I believe a particle because it moves like a billiard ball; it bounces off something and then goes straight ahead. This is just what I believe; many scientist believe the same thing.
We are a primitive race in the cosmos; we have who knows how much to learn and discover in science. Don't put anything in stone yet; the class is not over.
It's strange, whenever String theory is brought up cymatics is never encorporated. Why is this aspect of science silenced? Another strange silence of science is "entanglement" isn't this effect instantaneous making a speed limit a null concept?
The speed of the neutrinos was compared to the speed of light in a vacuum. The speed of light used is wrong. The speed of light we use now is the speed of light in dark matter. Light travels slower in dark matter just as it does any other matter. Air is transparent and has an index of refraction. Same for water. Mass slows the speed of light. Once you correct for this the neutrinos are going just slower than the speed of light. Look at my channel.
I think that even the most honored physicists themselves have to sit back and wonder if they are right in the end, given the number of things that are involved in the calculations they use to base their findings on.
Scientists know that just as a fast growing child sheds old clothes that no longer fit, science also sheds old ideas that no longer fit the growth of what technology reveals.
I think they could learn from your post. A dose of humility we need.
He said the possibility to go back in time to win the lottery or kill our grandmother...... well its impossible to go back in time to win the lottery, but you can just kill your grandmother
this doesnt matter if anything is faster then light because non locality exist (when 2 particles react to each other immediately even if they are a light year away)
This measurement, considering its antiquity, method of measurement, and 17th century uncertainty in exactly how far Jupiter was from the Earth, is surprisingly close to the modern value of 2.99792458 x 108 meters per second. These modern values are obtained using devices called laser interferometers, which can very precicely pin down speeds and distances. " Kindly copied and pasted from "Curious about astronomy" webpage
"The first true measurement of light-speed came in 1676 by a fellow named Olaf Roemer. He noted that the time elapsed between eclipses of Jupiter with its moons became shorter as the Earth moved closer to Jupiter and became longer as the Earth and Jupiter drew farther apart. This anomalous behavior could be accounted for by a finite speed of light. He calculated that the speed of light was something like 2.14 x 108 meters per second.
@jlr92958 Speed of light >in a vacuum< is supposed to be the universal speed limit, and yes, it can be hindered (slowed down) by passing through matter, such as water or glass.
@Nomasain did you not watch the video? light goes exactly the same speed no matter what.
space dust would hinder the intensity of the light over time, it has no relevance to the speed.
a burst of light would be lets say a sheed of paper for example, particles of dust in space in contact to the light bean would be me poking holes in the paper.
@jlr92958 did you not watch the video? light goes exactly the same speed no matter what.
space dust would hinder the intensity of the light over time, it has no relevance to the speed.
a burst of light would be lets say a sheed of paper for example, particles of dust in space in contact to the light bean would be me poking holes in the paper.
Well, even if a beam of light was slowed down by making it pass through a medium, once it is out of the medium, it would move again it's same speed. Wonder WHY?
Pls search for "Using BEC to Slow Down Light" in youtube and see the first few mnts.
@utubenagoya light is electromagnetic wave not a balistic projectile powered by an initial kinetic energy, light as an E/M wave travels as follows: a magnetic field is induced, then this turns into an electric field in the direction of movement, then this electric field creates another magnetic field again, and in vacuum it does this process at C speed
@llparasitell This may be the natural speed of light, however, humans are know to overcome the natural laws of nature. It is just a matter of time before we learn how to harness the energy need to go beyond that speed.
@jlr92958 breaking the sound barrier was never a law, it was hypothosised and proved wrong, theres a difference because you are talking about a hypothesis not a law.
breaking the speed of light is mathematically impossible, unless like in the video states, there was a special circumstance, which is probably true.
this means e=mc2 is not wrong, because it is still right.
and because of how little the speed is over light speed in this situation, its most likely a measurmental error.
@llparasitell Part 01: String theory I don't know if you have watched this but it shows that string theory is a hypothesis at best; it has not been proven.
@jlr92958 lol? You act as if you dont know string theory is a combination of many theoretic multitudes, many many equations to explain certain things.
so tell me what part of string theory are you referring to,
Don't forget dark matter and dark energy ? we know nothing about either and they make up 95 % of everything.. ok so we really cant say anything til we have found out a little about each of those.. case closed and i will be accepting thumbs up now !!
@koodahquake Dark matter and dark energy are simply place-holders. They are variables currently used so we can keep our current theories intact until we gain a better understanding of how gravity works, which might be mediated by them, maybe not. Physicists sometimes talk about them as if they were real, which we don't know. They are two hypotheses to explain observations. There is no evidence yet beyond these (retrospective and so far non-predictive) hypotheses that either exists.
@dcs002 Well the quantum world has many more shocks for us.. and nothing in the macro world really apply s..to me anyway.. plus I think they took a short cut to the mountain like dood said.. having access to "the Bulk".. If i where a nutreno and had access to other dimensions and was created from an unnatural event i would fuck with everyone too..lol
No no no time travel is impossible! Because time doesn't even exist. It's just a delusion created by the brain, this is how we construct our experience of existence. Causality is an illusion. Existence is timeless, eternal, everything happens all at once. So "you" can't "go" "backwards"!
@Atlantean24 Time travel is possible but only into the future. Time is influenced by your velocity relative to the observer. If you were to circle the earth in a space ship travelling at near the speed of light you would travel into the future. If you did this for a year you would age 1 year, whilst earth and everything on it would age 10 years.
The speed of light 180,000 M/s in a vacuum, but space is not a vacuum. In that case I belief that the speed of light is variable. When light shines through water the speed of light will be 90,000 M/s. When light particles collide against matter the particles will change their speed. The universe has dark matter, energie and a lot of things we do not know. Space isn't a vacuum, so in that case light speed must be variable. A vacuum can only be simulated on Earth!
Light Speed experiments should be done totally in space; our experiments are to find out if anything can travel faster or if we can achieve such velocities. We need to conduct these experiments within the solar system not the earth.
time actually travels faster for anything on a satellite. Time slows down in a gravitational field, so although the speed of the satellite slows time down slightly, the distance from the earth more than makes up for it (the effects of gravity in this case are about 6 times more prominent). speed slows time down about 7200ns/day, lower gravity speeds it up by 46000ns/day.
I guess BBC thought that was straying too far off topic..
at 32:35 were they looking for it 4 yrs ago? they didnt see the light so as far as there concerned it didnt happen the 4 yrs before.and since nuetrinos are so hard to detect even of they did see it, they mightve just assumed a false reading
1. light cant really pass through objects,nutrions can, witch would mean it has less mass witch means less resistance, so it should theoreticlly travel faster
2 there whole concept of time travel. is using that same logic as that headstart paradox (not sure its real name).At 28:27 what would happen is ud simply be sending the text before they knew it happen. think of it like a delay in a tv. the event already happen, but they just got the message 1st.
It's another propaganda video in hope to make absurd Big Bang theory a bit more believable. It's politics. The person on the screen isn't even a good mathematician probably. No mathematician with higher education makes his equations without integrals etc.
@Firelife3 and are you retarded or what? because that has nothing to do with what I've said. The Big Bang is an absurd. Just think about this. I think even your beloved bible is more believable. There may be no theory that would be worth of time, but even then believing in that shit is just idiocy.
@vamshiinhell let go of your ego pal and stop wasting your life trying to figure it all out and just let the truth come on its own like it always does
neutrinos may really do travel faster light due to its size, comparing it to an atom it is very small..if an atom is a "solar system" and the neutrinos are the size of a "golf ball" imagine that ultimately they have no measurable mass ..they can pass any atom while light can only travel w/ the presence of an atom particle..
I think Einstein was using his theory based on what he believed at the time and phsycists now tend to just continue to accept it as fact because we can't really prove it otherwise. I also think alot of science theory and wanting to understand makes things more complicated than they really are in alot of respects. Maybe one day technology will allow to prove these things right and wrong from the past, but until it catches up to us, we will always have many ideas as to what and why.
because there is nothing to restrct its momentum. The only mass would be the object itself and there would be nothing to resist the object from increasing in speed. It would eventually pass the speed of light, where it actually would be going back in time (as far the lights' travel is concerned not actual time) and continue. Since every second the light is 186,000 miles farther ahead the object would likely never "pass" the light, it would simply be traveling faster than it does per second.
Einstien says the faster you travel and reaching the speed of light the mass would eventually become infinate meaning its velocity would crush the object by its mass. I don't really believe this is true. We do experiments here on earth where you have to push the object thru either atmosphere (air pressure) or gravity and cannot reach the speed of light. In the vacuum of space there is none. A constant velocity generator would continually propel the object at increasing speed faster than light
I guess I find it hard to understand why the threshold of the speed of light is the maximum speed an object can travel. Light is simply an object in itself traveling at it's own maximum velocity. Just like a bullet travels at its maximum velocity based on it's original potential for propulsion. I can't see why an object can't travel faster than the speed of light, it is nothing more than 1 object taveling faster than another, they are not connected physically.
@JessicaTG2008 If you fire a bullet from a moving car, the velocity of the bullet relative to the ground will be the velocity from which it exits the gun + the velocity of the car
If you shine a flashlight from a moving car the speed of the rays of light is still exactly constant, the speed of the car has no effect.
Nothing can travel faster than the speed of light, not even light itself.
And this thing has already been disproven i think.
@JessicaT As time passes and things change, it looks like everything is smooth and constant but it's not.
The true passage of events would look like everything stops and starts at an incredibly fast pace like a strobe light flickers on/off
If something travels faster than the speed of light, it is not quantum registered and has skipped actually existing for a small section of reality, that's why the constant C is maximum, it's the frequency of existence x the passage of photons.
@JessicaTG2008 light travels at that speed it does because it is a massless particle and all massless particles travel at that speed (speed of light), neutrinos are not massless particles although they have a very low mass, but still they do have a certain mass that's why they can't travel faster then light, in theory or "fantasy" to travel faster then light you have to have an imagenary mass hence the presenter mentioned Tachyons which are hypothetical and highly unlikely existent particles.
When you make a science documentary you should hire a narrator who can pronounce "nuclear" correctly.
vk45de 2 hours ago
Star Hustler music at 4:18 (Arabesque). Miss you Jack Horkheimer.
black3119 2 hours ago
@6:26 middle figure at mirror.....
john2675 6 hours ago
I hope it's not just a measurement error..
gupta5882 1 day ago
Since when does a faulty connection make things go faster than the speed of light?
TheInterestedIn 1 day ago
@TheInterestedIn when doesnt a mistake happen and its a break though discovery?
juki0h 1 day ago
it was an error as the person before me wrote
excan90 2 days ago
It was a loose fibre optic connection apparently, and once it was fixed everything went back to observing the laws of physics, haha. I just read that the other day.
jtathaizzosh 2 days ago
@jtathaizzosh try rereading your source or reading a source worth reading
quote:
"But the team also said they found a problem in the optical fibre connection between the GPS signal and the experiment's main clock - quite simply, a cable not quite fully plugged in.
In contrast, the team said that effect would increase the neutrinos' apparent speed."
bbc report.
the problem seems to be in their timing method not the fibre optic connection.
the research will be repeated in may 2012 onward.
advers1078 2 days ago
@advers1078 So a loose cable increased the apparent speed of the neutrinos, that is exactly what I said... P.S. I never claimed to be the world's foremost expert in the area, cool your jets.
jtathaizzosh 2 days ago
@jtathaizzosh once the loose/damaged cable is plugged in well it would increase the speed of the neutrinos not reduce it. The fibre optic cable was a connection between the GPS satellite signal and the main clock, if its not plugged in full the data is reduced not increased and as such the main clock would be slightly off; I just hate when people put the effort to read the news and yet somehow be able to miss inform tht's all & like I initially said the problem is most likely in the timing gear
advers1078 2 days ago
just a theroy but these particles are smaller than atoms there passing between them hence yes they will go faster because there is nothing to stop them... so light being a certain atom size and things being bigger than the atom of light light atoms are hitting other attoms in the vacuum of space aka dust etc and it maxes the speed out.. just a thought
locutus340 2 days ago
6:46 Thumbs up for the 3rd movement of Beethoven's Tempest sonata = D
SomeAnimeOtaku 4 days ago
hmmm....
bryanchance100 4 days ago
6:29 flipped me off
kimbobrand7 4 days ago
@kimbobrand7 lmao
360waveboiiswagg 4 days ago
There will be final observations being done in May 2012 to finally resolve the issue!! But, by now they think they made a measurment mistake.
zvolencan77 5 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SIGNS OF JESUS COMING:DAMASCUS,SYRIA-WILL BE DESTROYED(ISAIAH 17:1),EGYPT(ISAIAH 19:1),ISRAEL-DIVIDED(JOEL 3:1-2),WARS-IRAN’PERSIA’(EZEKIEL 38-39,PSALMS 83), EARTHQUAKES(MATT.24),¬MYSTERIOUS DEATH OF ANIMALS(HOSEA 4:3),GLOBAL STRANGE SOUNDS(JEREMIAH 25:31).IT’S FRIGHTENING FOR THOSE WHO DON’T KNOW THE TRUTH.HELL IS REAL!WWIII,MEGA EARTHQUAKE?–RAPTURE (1THESSALONIANS 4:17)-ABOUT TO HAPPEN--ONLY THE HOLY ONES WILL SEE THE KINGDOM OF GOD.REPENT!READ THE BIBLE.GET IN THE ARK NOW!JESUS IS COMING!
ENTERRAPTURE20 5 days ago
I heard that they redid the calculations and found that there was no faster than light travel after accounting for the fact that the particles were traveling in a non-uniform gravitational field.
charlesvan13 5 days ago
@charlesvan13 Nope, they redid the calculations and found it still correct.
megamaa 5 days ago
so his ultimate conclusion was that the neutrinos took a shortcut through some sort of dimentional space? & then you have people saying that it was wrong the whole time because of gps? even if it was gps that failed, the distance reference should back that up but it doesn't, no - neutrino's & light moved much faster at the start of our universe, this has been observed, it's only natural to conclude that if cern was creating conditions like of that after the big bang then maybe they succeeded?
santirock69 6 days ago
Their text scenario is stupid, if the neutrino is faster than the speed of light, then that means Einstein was wrong. So their text message lottery situation shouldn't take into account relativity. Bunch of idiots.
Graham6762 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Tesla vs. Edison, Tesla won! Tesla vs. Marconi, Tesla won! In 21 century Tesla vs Einstein, and will we see who will won. Tesla said that the particles faster than light. CERN in 2011 is confirmed! Quantum Physics is sucks!
Key of universe are with me and future is my - Nikola Tesla
hill33ification 1 week ago
The zero point is in space and not the earth Where they meet
legendarypaulus 1 week ago
things being relative when a object traveling at more than half the speed of light passes me and I'm on an object travelling also slightly more than half the speed of light in the opposite direction the first object passes me at more than the speed of light, right??
frost1947 1 week ago
@frost1947 nope, see the 'Twin paradox' it has to do with Newtonian mechanics, only the twin that has undergone acceleration will have its clock ticking slower and will stay young.
VERGIS92 1 week ago
33:35 is where the video gets interesting.
Lilbitevil 1 week ago
Turned out to be a mistake
Avidcomp 1 week ago
Comment removed
jorgepeterbarton 1 week ago
Just this basic explanation blows my fucking mind. It's insane that he figured this out.
JakesNotDrinking 1 week ago
Light is, I believe a particle because it moves like a billiard ball; it bounces off something and then goes straight ahead. This is just what I believe; many scientist believe the same thing.
jlr92958 1 week ago
@jlr92958 it's the duality , it behaves as both a wave and a particle, and is also bent by gravity
VERGIS92 1 week ago
@VERGIS92 Only if matter is in its path; then it goes around it using gravity as a stream.
jlr92958 1 week ago
We are a primitive race in the cosmos; we have who knows how much to learn and discover in science. Don't put anything in stone yet; the class is not over.
jlr92958 1 week ago
One idea is there are many ways to look at string theory; watch the presentation.
jlr92958 1 week ago
Did anybody ever consider that gravity surrounds matter and that matter does not create it?
jlr92958 1 week ago
Einstein's theories were based on physics of the early to mid 20th century; we have discovered many things that question his theories since then.
jlr92958 1 week ago
It's strange, whenever String theory is brought up cymatics is never encorporated. Why is this aspect of science silenced? Another strange silence of science is "entanglement" isn't this effect instantaneous making a speed limit a null concept?
wiseyeffect 1 week ago
@wiseyeffect Isn't string theory a hypothesis? Why do people talk about it as if it is fact?
jlr92958 1 week ago
One day I was doing this chick in the butt so fast it had to be faster than the speed of light I was like totally doing her SO fast.
NEOSPORINZ 2 weeks ago
@NEOSPORINZ Did you cum like a bastard?
jlr92958 1 week ago
57:00 - yeah but the problem is - how many LHC's are there in the world?
TheMimeGogo 2 weeks ago
Lol....Eienstein's paper had no references ....
nehemiahjacob 2 weeks ago
No wonder this world is going down the toilet; nobody knows what to believe. there is total confusion on what everybody believes; no continuity.
jlr92958 2 weeks ago
Thanks for posting this. It is good to know that there is freedom from the shackles of Einsteinian dogma.
SherryVapors 2 weeks ago
The speed of the neutrinos was compared to the speed of light in a vacuum. The speed of light used is wrong. The speed of light we use now is the speed of light in dark matter. Light travels slower in dark matter just as it does any other matter. Air is transparent and has an index of refraction. Same for water. Mass slows the speed of light. Once you correct for this the neutrinos are going just slower than the speed of light. Look at my channel.
DiogenesofCalgary 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
johnmair 2 weeks ago
in these comments: bunch of people with very basic knowledge in physics arguing about the complex nature of the universe and thinking they are right.
lineikatabs 2 weeks ago
@lineikatabs Hahaha... Great comment.
I think that even the most honored physicists themselves have to sit back and wonder if they are right in the end, given the number of things that are involved in the calculations they use to base their findings on.
Scientists know that just as a fast growing child sheds old clothes that no longer fit, science also sheds old ideas that no longer fit the growth of what technology reveals.
I think they could learn from your post. A dose of humility we need.
2eelShmeal 2 weeks ago
He said the possibility to go back in time to win the lottery or kill our grandmother...... well its impossible to go back in time to win the lottery, but you can just kill your grandmother
lighteningxl 2 weeks ago
this doesnt matter if anything is faster then light because non locality exist (when 2 particles react to each other immediately even if they are a light year away)
LeonAQXX 3 weeks ago
The discovery of superluminal particles will shake up science but we will not have to "throw away all the textbooks"; that is oversimplification.
JamesTheMadProphet 3 weeks ago
I RUN FASTER THAN LIGHT
ToughSerb147 3 weeks ago
This measurement, considering its antiquity, method of measurement, and 17th century uncertainty in exactly how far Jupiter was from the Earth, is surprisingly close to the modern value of 2.99792458 x 108 meters per second. These modern values are obtained using devices called laser interferometers, which can very precicely pin down speeds and distances. " Kindly copied and pasted from "Curious about astronomy" webpage
cloverleaf4all 3 weeks ago
"The first true measurement of light-speed came in 1676 by a fellow named Olaf Roemer. He noted that the time elapsed between eclipses of Jupiter with its moons became shorter as the Earth moved closer to Jupiter and became longer as the Earth and Jupiter drew farther apart. This anomalous behavior could be accounted for by a finite speed of light. He calculated that the speed of light was something like 2.14 x 108 meters per second.
cloverleaf4all 3 weeks ago
If the S.O.L. can be hindered than it is not the universal speed limit.
jlr92958 3 weeks ago
@jlr92958 Speed of light >in a vacuum< is supposed to be the universal speed limit, and yes, it can be hindered (slowed down) by passing through matter, such as water or glass.
dcs002 3 weeks ago
@dcs002 If space dust is removed, than light would probably go faster.
jlr92958 3 weeks ago
@jlr92958 Sorry to butt in, but space dust propels the photons....
Nomasain 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Nomasain did you not watch the video? light goes exactly the same speed no matter what.
space dust would hinder the intensity of the light over time, it has no relevance to the speed.
a burst of light would be lets say a sheed of paper for example, particles of dust in space in contact to the light bean would be me poking holes in the paper.
I hope this clears your understanding.
llparasitell 1 week ago
@jlr92958 did you not watch the video? light goes exactly the same speed no matter what.
space dust would hinder the intensity of the light over time, it has no relevance to the speed.
a burst of light would be lets say a sheed of paper for example, particles of dust in space in contact to the light bean would be me poking holes in the paper.
I hope this clears your understanding.
llparasitell 1 week ago
@llparasitell
Wonder why light has to keep moving at it's speed all the time, why not slow down and stop in space in front of us. Any idea pls.
utubenagoya 1 week ago
@utubenagoya light has no rest mass, that's what makes it different
VERGIS92 1 week ago
@VERGIS92
Well, even if a beam of light was slowed down by making it pass through a medium, once it is out of the medium, it would move again it's same speed. Wonder WHY?
Pls search for "Using BEC to Slow Down Light" in youtube and see the first few mnts.
utubenagoya 1 week ago
@utubenagoya light is electromagnetic wave not a balistic projectile powered by an initial kinetic energy, light as an E/M wave travels as follows: a magnetic field is induced, then this turns into an electric field in the direction of movement, then this electric field creates another magnetic field again, and in vacuum it does this process at C speed
VERGIS92 1 week ago
@VERGIS92 Light is a particle!
jlr92958 1 week ago
@jlr92958 nope! light is photons, and they have ZERO rest mass, a particle must have rest mass or else it's not a particle
VERGIS92 1 week ago
@VERGIS92
Thank you.
utubenagoya 1 week ago
@llparasitell This may be the natural speed of light, however, humans are know to overcome the natural laws of nature. It is just a matter of time before we learn how to harness the energy need to go beyond that speed.
jlr92958 1 week ago
@jlr92958 humans are knows to overcome natural laws?
name me one law that humans overcame in the past, if a law is over ruled than the law wasn't true in the first place.
and to answer your other question,
String theory is a THEORY, lmao its even named t-h-e-o-r-y
Do you even know what string theory is ?
Its a multitude of many theory to explain everything.
so far the math behind most of the theory makes sence,
llparasitell 1 week ago
@llparasitell The sound barrier, breaking free of earth's gravity; in the past scientist said these things could not be done.
jlr92958 1 week ago
@jlr92958 breaking the sound barrier was never a law, it was hypothosised and proved wrong, theres a difference because you are talking about a hypothesis not a law.
breaking the speed of light is mathematically impossible, unless like in the video states, there was a special circumstance, which is probably true.
this means e=mc2 is not wrong, because it is still right.
and because of how little the speed is over light speed in this situation, its most likely a measurmental error.
llparasitell 1 week ago
@llparasitell Part 01: String theory I don't know if you have watched this but it shows that string theory is a hypothesis at best; it has not been proven.
jlr92958 1 week ago
@jlr92958 lol? You act as if you dont know string theory is a combination of many theoretic multitudes, many many equations to explain certain things.
so tell me what part of string theory are you referring to,
because alot of it is theorized.
llparasitell 1 week ago
haha the title immediately made me think of brian griffin's book title
sudzrbad 3 weeks ago
Just because einstein said something doesn't mean it was true, he got a lot of things wrong, but they act like if a jew says it is has to be true.
Graham6762 3 weeks ago
and as we all know there are galaxy's at edge of our known universe traveling at speeds way beyond light..
koodahquake 3 weeks ago
Don't forget dark matter and dark energy ? we know nothing about either and they make up 95 % of everything.. ok so we really cant say anything til we have found out a little about each of those.. case closed and i will be accepting thumbs up now !!
koodahquake 3 weeks ago
@koodahquake Dark matter and dark energy are simply place-holders. They are variables currently used so we can keep our current theories intact until we gain a better understanding of how gravity works, which might be mediated by them, maybe not. Physicists sometimes talk about them as if they were real, which we don't know. They are two hypotheses to explain observations. There is no evidence yet beyond these (retrospective and so far non-predictive) hypotheses that either exists.
dcs002 3 weeks ago
@dcs002 Well the quantum world has many more shocks for us.. and nothing in the macro world really apply s..to me anyway.. plus I think they took a short cut to the mountain like dood said.. having access to "the Bulk".. If i where a nutreno and had access to other dimensions and was created from an unnatural event i would fuck with everyone too..lol
koodahquake 3 weeks ago
rofl @ 6:28 hahahaha, he flipped the bird! :D
Greendragon420able 1 month ago
New Killer Bomb...
sweetnothing1977 1 month ago
the difficult we do immediately the impossible takesss a little while longer
TheDublin09 1 month ago
No no no time travel is impossible! Because time doesn't even exist. It's just a delusion created by the brain, this is how we construct our experience of existence. Causality is an illusion. Existence is timeless, eternal, everything happens all at once. So "you" can't "go" "backwards"!
Atlantean24 1 month ago
@Atlantean24 Time travel is possible but only into the future. Time is influenced by your velocity relative to the observer. If you were to circle the earth in a space ship travelling at near the speed of light you would travel into the future. If you did this for a year you would age 1 year, whilst earth and everything on it would age 10 years.
leerees 1 month ago
The speed of light 180,000 M/s in a vacuum, but space is not a vacuum. In that case I belief that the speed of light is variable. When light shines through water the speed of light will be 90,000 M/s. When light particles collide against matter the particles will change their speed. The universe has dark matter, energie and a lot of things we do not know. Space isn't a vacuum, so in that case light speed must be variable. A vacuum can only be simulated on Earth!
brightingsky2009 1 month ago
Nice presentation. I'm just sorry that the narrator doesn't know how to properly pronounce the word "Nuclear."
georgegoss1 1 month ago 14
@georgegoss1 Mr smarty pants, every country have their own accent. Does that make any difference to the show?
siccckhead 2 weeks ago
We should not say it's impossible but that we believe it's impossible; for now we can not prove it either way. So don't state hypothesis as facts.
jlr92958 1 month ago in playlist Favorite videos
0:50 travel back in time is impossible, even if you are going faster than light. I hate when pplz say that, they dont understand sh!t
Typho0n86 1 month ago
Light Speed experiments should be done totally in space; our experiments are to find out if anything can travel faster or if we can achieve such velocities. We need to conduct these experiments within the solar system not the earth.
jlr92958 1 month ago in playlist Favorite videos
@jlr92958 Indeed my brother, we must conduct these experiments in space within and out our solar system, because space isn't a vacuum.
brightingsky2009 1 month ago
Concerning string theory, it might be applied to organic matter but not inorganic matter?
jlr92958 1 month ago
im thinking, and thats the only thing important!
system0system0 1 month ago
...loyte?
cdubsak 1 month ago
Neutrino: The bad boy of physics
glenndar 1 month ago 17
time actually travels faster for anything on a satellite. Time slows down in a gravitational field, so although the speed of the satellite slows time down slightly, the distance from the earth more than makes up for it (the effects of gravity in this case are about 6 times more prominent). speed slows time down about 7200ns/day, lower gravity speeds it up by 46000ns/day.
I guess BBC thought that was straying too far off topic..
MIISHOWW 1 month ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
at 32:35 were they looking for it 4 yrs ago? they didnt see the light so as far as there concerned it didnt happen the 4 yrs before.and since nuetrinos are so hard to detect even of they did see it, they mightve just assumed a false reading
xTheDeathSaintx 1 month ago
couple things dont make sense to me
1. light cant really pass through objects,nutrions can, witch would mean it has less mass witch means less resistance, so it should theoreticlly travel faster
2 there whole concept of time travel. is using that same logic as that headstart paradox (not sure its real name).At 28:27 what would happen is ud simply be sending the text before they knew it happen. think of it like a delay in a tv. the event already happen, but they just got the message 1st.
xTheDeathSaintx 1 month ago
@xTheDeathSaintx doesnt light not have mass?
dfceltics20 1 month ago
It's another propaganda video in hope to make absurd Big Bang theory a bit more believable. It's politics. The person on the screen isn't even a good mathematician probably. No mathematician with higher education makes his equations without integrals etc.
ibziur 1 month ago
@ibziur r u american or something?
VXiuhcoatl 1 month ago
@VXiuhcoatl Nope. And what it has to do with what I wrote?
ibziur 1 month ago
@ibziur how can you expect most people on here to understand what you're saying?
Redflowers9 1 month ago
@ibziur and u belive in the bible?
Firelife3 1 month ago
@Firelife3 and are you retarded or what? because that has nothing to do with what I've said. The Big Bang is an absurd. Just think about this. I think even your beloved bible is more believable. There may be no theory that would be worth of time, but even then believing in that shit is just idiocy.
ibziur 1 month ago
Why would you even ask that question? Why does that matters for You? huh?
ibziur 1 month ago
am i the only with the sound lag?
nubz66 1 month ago
I love science and physics.
MrTyAaron 1 month ago 2
the flux capacitor is reallll someone build it
problyout 1 month ago
@problyout What makes you think that I will have not already done that?
VXiuhcoatl 1 month ago
@VXiuhcoatl because you havent
problyout 1 month ago
Marcus du Sautoy is bald now? I remember when he still had hair :\
dojokonojo 1 month ago
To the creationists.... what does the book of genesis say about the speed of light. Does it violate the laws of thermodynamics?
vamshiinhell 2 months ago 2
@vamshiinhell let go of your ego pal and stop wasting your life trying to figure it all out and just let the truth come on its own like it always does
problyout 1 month ago
@vamshiinhell now, your going into unknown territory that they have no idea how to even begin to make a sentence on it.
Shawn21769 1 month ago
i hope its true its really interesting
islamloverist 2 months ago
neutrinos may really do travel faster light due to its size, comparing it to an atom it is very small..if an atom is a "solar system" and the neutrinos are the size of a "golf ball" imagine that ultimately they have no measurable mass ..they can pass any atom while light can only travel w/ the presence of an atom particle..
paulaaron777 2 months ago
@paulaaron777 whats the lights's speed?...
keylllogdark 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I think Einstein was using his theory based on what he believed at the time and phsycists now tend to just continue to accept it as fact because we can't really prove it otherwise. I also think alot of science theory and wanting to understand makes things more complicated than they really are in alot of respects. Maybe one day technology will allow to prove these things right and wrong from the past, but until it catches up to us, we will always have many ideas as to what and why.
JessicaTG2008 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
because there is nothing to restrct its momentum. The only mass would be the object itself and there would be nothing to resist the object from increasing in speed. It would eventually pass the speed of light, where it actually would be going back in time (as far the lights' travel is concerned not actual time) and continue. Since every second the light is 186,000 miles farther ahead the object would likely never "pass" the light, it would simply be traveling faster than it does per second.
JessicaTG2008 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Einstien says the faster you travel and reaching the speed of light the mass would eventually become infinate meaning its velocity would crush the object by its mass. I don't really believe this is true. We do experiments here on earth where you have to push the object thru either atmosphere (air pressure) or gravity and cannot reach the speed of light. In the vacuum of space there is none. A constant velocity generator would continually propel the object at increasing speed faster than light
JessicaTG2008 3 months ago
I guess I find it hard to understand why the threshold of the speed of light is the maximum speed an object can travel. Light is simply an object in itself traveling at it's own maximum velocity. Just like a bullet travels at its maximum velocity based on it's original potential for propulsion. I can't see why an object can't travel faster than the speed of light, it is nothing more than 1 object taveling faster than another, they are not connected physically.
JessicaTG2008 3 months ago
@JessicaTG2008 If you fire a bullet from a moving car, the velocity of the bullet relative to the ground will be the velocity from which it exits the gun + the velocity of the car
If you shine a flashlight from a moving car the speed of the rays of light is still exactly constant, the speed of the car has no effect.
Nothing can travel faster than the speed of light, not even light itself.
And this thing has already been disproven i think.
Monsterguden 3 months ago
@JessicaT As time passes and things change, it looks like everything is smooth and constant but it's not.
The true passage of events would look like everything stops and starts at an incredibly fast pace like a strobe light flickers on/off
If something travels faster than the speed of light, it is not quantum registered and has skipped actually existing for a small section of reality, that's why the constant C is maximum, it's the frequency of existence x the passage of photons.
johnaiton 2 months ago
@JessicaTG2008 light travels at that speed it does because it is a massless particle and all massless particles travel at that speed (speed of light), neutrinos are not massless particles although they have a very low mass, but still they do have a certain mass that's why they can't travel faster then light, in theory or "fantasy" to travel faster then light you have to have an imagenary mass hence the presenter mentioned Tachyons which are hypothetical and highly unlikely existent particles.
truesemite 1 month ago