The experts cant explain it so its very likely this cubby person on youtube with an annoying TV sounds in the background... NIST has asked others to explain it cause they sure can't...
WTC& was supposed to be hit by the plane out of JFK - but that didn't go to plan.
So they brought it down before dusk to stop the charges being seen in the dark and to stop the pre planted explosives being found - who the fuck hasn't worked that out yet?
@spacehopperballs yes hes right and your wrong you twoofers! they where raging fires thats why people can stand next to them for over 20 minutes! damn twoofers and your fuckin god damn commen sense!.....
anyone with a brain can see that 47 story buildings dont turn it to dust and fall at the speed of gravity from fire evan the twin towers witch turnd into dust magicly witch are 72 story buildings the just fucken evaparated into there own foot prints like that. i think its safe to say that 1 of his family works for the NWO and is about to get hung out too dry and hes all but hurt about it. alass youv only proven won thing that retards shouldnt breed
@kenneth1795 Conspiracy theorists are pathological liars and are inherently afraid of their own shadow. To them, its impossible to believe the simplest solution is the correct one, instead, they take the details they wish to use, forget the ones that don't apply, misquote people, use conclusions that use no facts, references, observations To them, its easier to blame the enemy they know (the U.S government), rather than the enemy they do not know and can not identify or locate
dude your a tard you should go too to the UN take off all your close and scream out loud i would like too be ass raped frist dumby then shoot your self
i've got a question for you - do you think that challenging the government's explanation for a cataclysmic event that is being used as the justification for endless wars and the curtailment of civil liberties is somehow... unamerican? You still looking for those WMDs?
that´s just a stupid explanation.How come you havent found osama bin laden yet?do you think you will ever find him?and your goverment started this al Queda shit anyways.bin laden handpicked 19 guys to hijack 4 planes with boxcutters,I understand that you wanna defend your country and i don´t blame you for that.But poeple over there seems to just buy everything they hear on tv these days.It´s a stupid story that makes no sense.how many innocent poeple have your goverment killed by starting wars?
one more thing, for someone who thinks truthers are such dumnies and have no case, you sure as hell spend alot of time speaking out against them. If truthers are so stupid why do you waste so much time? I think I know exactly where you are coming from.
didnt hear them say that, Im pretty sure I heard the testimony of teh firefighters clearly saying they heard explosions. BOOM, BOOM , BOOM while the building was collapsing. Pull it has been used for demolition. Do your research mam.
you're an idiot, just ignore the fire fighters and rescue workers who heard explosions. Not to mention the owner of the WTC saying over radio to "pull it."
I dont complain in the streets. Infact I dont complain at all. Instead I support further investigation, especially into the better hypothesis which was completey ignored by the governments official inestigation. Science should have not rules out the better hypothesis.
dude your an idiot. You dont even need such a powerful explosion to start the thermite reaction which cuts through metal and melts steel. Maybe that explains why they found traces of the stuff in the debri and why they found melted steel on the bottom of all three buildings. People do yourself a favor and wake up. Look up Dr Steven Jones for yourselves. Dont let his testimony be silenced by thugs.
used to be on your side a week ago. After watching the videos covering Dr Jones, I can no longer agree with the official explanation the government gave on the collapses of the WTC 1,2, and 7. too much evidence supports prepositioned explosives using thermite
911 was a United States initiated, United States executed treasonous action against americans and humanity. It was ordered by George Bush and rich american and Israeli jews to assist and usher in Legislation to ease the transition of a one world government. We are done here. These are the facts son and they are..undisputed.
On a side note fat ass you have a bologna for a brain, you are an american, the lowest form of life on this planet. There isnt room for humans AND americans on my earth.
theres no need to be upset about americans. Its not our fault the the media is bias. I just recently came to learnd of Dr Steven Jones a week ago. Thats because the news doesnt cover him very well.
Not all americans agree with their government. Your comment devides those among the truth because a great majority of them are americans and you just insulted them all.
i wonder if u even kno what was WTC 7? in it was the fbi, secret service, various govt centers, it was even guiliani's supposed safe house so it should b probably 1 of the safest & strongest facilities in NYC! now u tellin me a little bit of debris & limited fire caused the massive instantaneous collapse of the entire WTC7? so which sound mor like bull? i mean if u put 2 & 2 together, we c that there r people who would much rather c the destruction of such a building- ie criminals not foreign
If the fires in WTC 1 and 2 were so hot how was it that a woman who is named Rachel was able to walk through the impact area and wave for help in the opening made by the airplane?
If you doubt this just google.."Woman waving from WTC 1".
For someone who just walked through a raging inferno she manages to not be burned.
dood doo the math and the science it DOES NOT FUCKING ADD UPP... OUR CONSPIRACY THEORY SOUNDS WAY BETTER YOUR SONSPIRACY SAYING THAT DEBREE FROM THE TOURS THAT HAPPEND TO BE MILES AWAY FLEW ALL THE WAY OVER THEERE AND KNOCKED IT DOWN LMAO
Falling debris and raging infernos do not cause 47 story sky scrapers to collapse at free fall speed straight into their own footprint....nor did you care to mention the molten steel at all 3 bases of the towers. Fire is 1000 degrees short of liquifying structural steel which melts at 2700 degrees fahrenheit, erego fire didnt cause its collapse.
You are sitting there reading off of a website pretending to know what the fuck your talking about and claiming debunk status. Thats called plagiarism friend you get an F.
and also...because surely whoever this video was intended for didnt explain the anomalies of building 7I will elaborate.
Time to move out of you mommys basement and think about girls or something. Maybe do some research and you will see how obvious it is your goverment planned all of 9-11
I hope your not going to start to cry, is mommy around to hold you
This kid lives in Florida, there aren't any basements in Florida, dumbass. YOU'RE probably in your Mommy's basement, wearing a tinfoil hat and whacking off to 'Loose Change' all day long.
So they designed WTC7 as a bunker type facility for a 9/11 type of circumstance and they fatally designed each column to hold 2000 feet of floor space? hahhahaha
Lets here you explain away the Law of Conservation of Momentum because that law as well as several others were broken that day when building 7 collapsed.
Anyone that holds a physics degree knows something is wrong with the fall time. Second, hydro carbon fires will never ever melt steel.
They did in deed mess up the construction of that building by relying on so few support beams. People f-up from time to time and sadly, that building was one of them. They placed a high preasure gas line at the base of the building, right where debris from the tower struck it. This caused a chain reaction which took out at least one of the connected generators. The exploding generator would've sent a brief power surge, causing the transformers in that building to explode.
So then WTC7 was the 3rd building in the history of mankind to fall due to fire, in the same city, on the same day, to dive symmetrically into its own footprint at freefall speed?
Of course the first 2 buildings, WTC1,2 experienced the same thing.
Only in America could this be achieved!
INSIDE JOB WRITTEN ALL OVER IT.
Physics says inside job, you must not believe in physics, or, you believe the USA can just turn physics on and off whenever they need it!
You're leaving out all sorts of information. Building 7 wasn't built like traditional building. I'm gonna assume you mean "steel framed building" and not just building, cause millions of buildings fall due to fire. It's the steel type that got people wondering. However as I said, the building was uniquie. It contained only 3 steel struts as weight baring points. It also had several generators fed by a high preasure gas line. The gas line was ignited by falling debris.
First of all, maybe turn down the tv before you make a vid, just a tip. Second, your not explaining much, your just regurgitating the official BS story back to us. U wanna explain something why don't you tell us why there was molten metal underneath the WTC7, or why everyone knew this bldg was coming down: (firefighters, Giuliani, the BBC, Silverstein,etc.) or why WTC bldgs 3, 4, 5 & 6 which were all closer in proximity to 1 &2, had far worse debris and fire damage but all remained standing..
gs generators cannot cause structuaral failure of a steel frame building no matter how it was designed to hold its weight. sorry you fail horribly. gas explosions cause momentous force but not enough to cause a free fall of a building, or if it somehow did that explosive force would have to be directed at syncronous points in order to achieve that vacuum effect. go eat some more freedom fries
And here's a video of a fire department Lieutenant saying he's gonna take down Bld. 7 if it doesn't fall on it's own. How fucking nice. I wonder how he was going to do that. And since when did the fire department start taking down towers? Sort of goes hand in hand with Silverstein's PULL IT. You de-bunkers need to find a new line of work. watch?v=uEDbzC8Rork
Larry referred to pulling the efforts to save the building along with the fire fighters.
I have a fine job. Debunking you all is a fun hobby cause it's so easy. Like your video, it's just a fire fighter stating the obvious. You got a building with massive damage. Since they knew it was going to come down eventually, they wanted to make sure it wasn't a day or so later when people might be in the area cleaning. However it came down on it's own.
What a cleaver and witty come back. Clearly because I disagree with you, I must have no real education. You're right, I don't have any college degrees cause I haven't bothered working towards one. Instead, I've taken classes to enrich myself. For my hard work, I have a total of 51 credit hours, most of which are computer classes (hardware, programming, etc).
9/11 was the largest attack on US soil ever and naturally people want to believe we're more secure then we actually were.
What a shit for brains moron you are. How the hell did they know the building was going to fall down? And that building didn't have massive damage. You want to see massive damage, take a look at 3-4-6. They were pulverized to death and still didn;t fall down. And what the hell do you mean by = they knew it was going to come down eventually and wanted to make sure it wasn't a day or so later? Here, take a look at Bld. 5. I'm dying to hear your know it all answer on this one. watch?v=3fjAkZpnSO0
First of all, I don't think I insulted anyone, so please try to keep this civil.
Second, there's more then enough video with people saying there were signs that the building would come down.
Building 5 apepared to be 5 to 7 floors tall (a guess). I can't talk about it's construction designs cause I've never looked them up. However I can say it's almost certainly a different type then building 7. Building 7 was 47 floors tall as well. It's all about weight.
Building 7 had hardly any damage from debris. A hunk of steel stuck in the face of the building and a few small fires isn't enough to make a tower fall to the ground flat as a pancake in one shot. Look at this video of Bld. 5. This thing was pulverized to death, engulfed in flames from top to bottom and it still didn't fall down. watch?v=3fjAkZpnSO0
The building had damage right where the three desiel generators were located. They caught fire, blew up, disrupting the electical grid, causing the transformers to overload, and eventually the heat and explossions took out the support columns. That and the fact that none of the buildings actually fell at "free fall speed" proves there were no bombs.
The fact that 7 was hit by falling debris serves as evidence itself of explosives in wtc1 and 2. enormous amounts of materials were blown outward which would not be part of a "pan cake" or "tamper" scenario. only explosives have the ability to pulverize 500,000 tons of steel and reinforced concrete in the blink of an eye. THINK
why did wtc 7 collapse from falling debris yet wtc 3,4,5,6 did not. they were hit by just as much or more falling debris and also had fires. where is the evidence of this raging inferno burning inside wtc 7? every video clip ive ever seen shows only small fires burning on a few floors, not to mention that fire is incapable of causing a perfectly symmetrical collapse at nearly freefall speed. It would be the 3rd time in history that happened, the first 2 being earlier that day, right next door.
Hey fat boy... get off the couch and do something productive! You think falling debris caused this building to collapse in 6.5 seconds??? Listen man, do yourself a favor and take this video off youtube... You obviously do not know what you are talking about and your making as ass out of yourself...
Yep I guess the NIST has no scientific merit because that's where I got the information, your explanation of "hey it looks like a controlled demolition" is a fucking joke as are you twoofer faggot Timothy Mcveigh wannabe proto-fascist loser.
@ThomasLocke1789 Of course NIST could never have been corrupted & there are no banking familes & other powerful families that have controlled the world for centuries (if not milleniums) that could have controlled the NIST explanation! What a crazy idea! By the way, have you seen the video footage of the collapse of WTC 7?
@ThomasLocke1789 the 'explanation' that you offered in this video lasted from .37 to 1.05. Your explanation was 28 seconds long--28 seconds out of 109. Most of the 'explanation' (I was actually looking for a sound refutation) was you blathering on about how pissed you are at your opponents in this argument. You should choose a different user name, as Locke is probably spinning in his grave.
Yes, I'm afraid he is. But, just think of how much fertelizer this sack of human waste will produce for our crops after we take care of him and his ilk in the second american revolution. The depression is comming everyone.
Bring it twoofer faggot, I've still got my 2nd amendment rights, so I'll put a bullet in your fucking head if you ever try to infringe upon my natural right of life.
YOU GOT NOTHING...You dirty fat fuck. The fascist/corporate/ bank government that you so love will take your gun and throw you into a detention camp. Who do you think they are going to come for first shithead? You think just because you spew their putrid agenda they will spare you? You will die for the will of the American empire. Stop quoting the founders.
Lol no I will die for the republic in defense against proto-fascist little faggots like you so why don't you go jerk off to the Turner Diaries again you Timothy McVeigh wannabe piece of shit? I will fucking kill you if you ever come after me and mine so fucking bring you fascist fuck!
Who the fuck records a video with the TV on in the background? Idiots.
Your explanation for WT7 is unsubstantial. You offer nothing more than the official explanation which STILL does not explain how the building collapsed in such a symmetric, demolition-like, manner.
Anyone with an atom of intelligence can see the resemblance to controlled demolishment in the collapse of WT7.
Perhaps you should take a look at the OK city bombing of the Murrah federal building and ask yourself why that building remained standing? Why did 5 and 6(which were more heavily damaged)remain standing yet 7 fell? If ignoring of the all the "coincidences" involved with the 911 attacks makes you feel better then all I can say to you is I'm sorry. We were attacked, that fact remains, I'm just not sure it was by the people that we were told did it and Im not subscribing to the "Official report".
congrats thomaslocke ur a douchebag! continue to kill urself with that cig cuz it makes u look so much cooler while trying to convince people how wtc7 came down.
So funny. You keep talking about presenting facts, but I still haven't heard or seen ANY fact from you. None, supported by sources that is. You saying something is fact, doesn't make it so.
Question to you: What is your professional background, that makes your statements so much more valid than anyone else?
fuckin idiots love to coin catchwords like "truther" , you have the logic of infants. are you guys really so in fear of a government without concience? it is scary... but not so scary as your refusal to stare cold hard facts in the eye. wt7 in inexplixacle by any other means than controlled demolition.
Perhaps on planet twoofer, but here in reality it is explained by a 10 story hole in the south facade of the building and fires that went unfought for 7 hours.
I hope the guy on this video will live to bitterly regret his brainwashed and stupid, unexperienced teenage FOXNEWS-staged neocon-bullshit view on the world!
He looks and acts like one so he fooled us. Fuck off with your attitude.
And don't be a verbally abusive prick to people who try to offer information that nobody in this country even does themselves the favor of looking at. Go to sleep you vindictive ignorant-ass American, and put your head back in the sand. It being an inside job is all over other intelligence agencies and common knowledge in these agencies... they're laughing at us because of people like you.
I wish I could see you on the street just to first tell you the supposed bullshit and after I am done with that I am gona smear actuall bullshit on your computer in hope you never use it to spout stupid shit and deciet given to by non other than mainstream media. Its ok im still sure after your done cleanin the shit your gona make another video to piss off more people and make you look like more than just the huge waste of space you are.Also peace is gone thanks to people who dont ask questions.
How do you explain the thermite reidues at ground zero. Steven Jones (physics prof, BYU) gives a presentation where he uses a little method called NMR (nulear magnetic resonance) spectrophotometry to prove the presence of thermite.
you a stupid fat motherfucker, you are dump sheep. open books you sick fuck and stop reading all the BULLSHIT they say. Stop sucking dicks. Stop being an ignorant bitch. Do RESEARCH. AND STOP SMOKING, YOU'RE FAT ENOUGH TO GET A HEART ATTACK.
"CHARCATERISTICS OF CONTROLLED DEMOLITION" {Post these for the "Debunkers"} #1.Sudden onset. #2.Symmetrical collapse. {Straight down} #3.Near free fall speed. #4.Total collapse. {Not partial or Localized} #5.Sliced steel. #6.Pulverization of concrete. #7.Pyroclastic dust clouds. #8.Horozontal ejection. #9.Demolition rings. #10.Eyewitness testimony of explosions. #11.Molten metal. Evidence for all were shown on the WTC buildings.
I offered you a more rational explination then the Truthers have offered so far. It seems to be a popular sport amongst Truthers to completely ignore the more rational theories and go straight for the ones that support their government hating notions. No one has ruled out the transformers and from what I've heard from eye witness testimoney, it's more likely them. They said the explosions were followed by a crackling sound. Doesn't that fit a transformer overload a lot better then CD exploves?
How many transformers have you been around when they exploded? 1? 100?
I have seen eye witness testimony from firefighters who where in the building that said they saw "molten lava" coming down the stairwell. That would support the claim that Thermite was used to melt and weaken steel support beams in the towers.
Traces of this Thermite material, which burns 3 times hotter than jet fuel can burn even under ideal conditions have been found on debris from WTC 1 and 2.
I've seen a few in real life and a few videos of them exploding on Youtube. They sound exactly like bombs going off with one difference. After exploding, a crackling sound can be heard. Just like the witnesses described.
Thermite was ruled out because it can't cut through steel beams. And please don't try the "nano-thermite" angle as that stuff doesn't actually exist. It's a theoretical substance that hasn't actually been made yet.
4. And most importantly, to set up the US to go to war under false pretenses, just like EVERY other war starting with WW1 in US history. Not only war, but a war unlike any other that will have never have a visible end. That way we can fight forever making people richer.
Explaining world trade seven with the official story means jackshit! If the official story were even remotely believable people wouldn't be questioning it. 911 did four things.
1. Got rid of two buildings that were loosing money.
2. Got rid of a ton of evidence about insider trading and other criminal dealings of white collar crimes. (building 7)
"CHARACTERISTICS OF CONTROLLED DEMOLITION" {This is for all you "Debunkers" #1.Sudden onset. #2.Symmetrical collapse. {Straight down} #3.Near free fall speed. #4.Total collapse {Not partial or Localized} #5.Sliced steel. #6.Pulverization of concrete. #7.Pyroclastic dust clouds. #8.Horizontal ejections. #9.Demolition rings. #10.Eyewitness testimony of exolosions. #11.Molten metal.
Thomas, you truely are quite the idiot. I played your explaination a few times and laughed harder with each replay. You're crapping out a bunch of mumbo billshit from your mouth, and your manor screams of someone who has no idea of the meaning behind what he is saying. Please stop embarrasing yourself all over youtube. Thanks for the chuckle though! :)
Read the NIST report. It's a laughing stock of lies. No explosions heard by people? Google "9/11 Explosions" and you'll see witnesses and hear the explosions yourself. NIST LIED. They are a government agency. Government agencies LIE. Government officials LIE. The official story is a LIE. Get it?
Instead of making an fool of yourself, just do one thing for me ... watch "The Power of Nightmares". It's on Youtube. Before you reply to another comment or post another embarassing video, just watch it ... all three episodes. Watch them with open eyes and an open mind. I would be interested in your response. A little light might just start to flicker inside your head ...
WOW you are repeating official bs, that means about as much as all the other bs.
James Quintiere says the investigations were blocked from seeking answers and we need a new independent investigation. He also says that the nist conclusions are not backed up by the evidence they found.
journalof911studies com for some scientific and well sourced papers.
facts and scientific tests mean much more than your uneducated opinion
Show me that hole? But you cant! Even if you could it would not explain the way it fell.
Skyscrapers don't collapse at near gravity speed in the path of most resistance with out explosives. They don't and they never will. You can clearly see a sock wave running upward WT7 just as it start to collapse, how do you explain that? Don't bother!
Nice try but asymmetrical fires don't cause symmetrical collapses. Meaning that Fires that weaken steel in an asymmetrical pattern don't account for a perfect 7 second collapse into the building's footprint. The building collapses of 9/11 are unpresidented, no steel building in human history has ever collapsed due to fire. plus 9/11 truth is a movement tha aims to ask questions not rant and rave notice the signs that say investigate 9/11. We just want to find out what really happened.
WTC 6 was heavily damaged by falling debris because it was standing next to tower one. Still, the remaining structure didn't collapse. WTC 7 was on the other side of the road, only to be lightly scratched by falling debris. No plane, no huge fires and no huge structural damage. Still WTC 7 implodes and collapse straight down. Verizon and the U.S. Post Office standing next to WTC 7 was both untouched. Clearly I have a question.
You truly are a dumb SOB WTC 6's fires were being fought, and its center of gravity was nothing like WTC 7's because it was nowhere near as tall. And if by "lightly scratched" you mean had a 10 story hole in it which stretched 1/3 across the South Facade and 1/4 into the interior, then ya sure, and not to mention that you are talking about 4 completely different building structures so WTF exactly is your point retard?
This retard does indeed have a professional background in architecture and structural engineering. What do you do apart from being a computer neard?
1/4 into the interior you say. Can you back this up?
Look at the image/floor plan in your inbox (can't post links here).
It shows "possible extend of debris damage". That is "3 columns that could have "possibly" been damaged". Did this "possible" damage cause all columns in the whole building to collapse simultaneously?
Yes I was like I said their was a hole in WTC 7 caused by collapsing buildings 1&2 which extended 1/3 across the south facade and 1/4 into the interior and this combined with the fires that had gone unfought for many hours brought down the building.
your an idiot man, your reading that crap off a bullcrap report, its obvious that 911 was an iside job, they still cant even tell us who did it let alone give a proper explanation to what happened that day, wake up like everyone else.... -peace
Um the names of the hijackers have been listed, the conspiracy theories revolving around them are bullshit as if no Muslim person in the world has the same name. And I think I'll believe the report from the NIST which had 100's of experts working on it over some truther faggot website than you very much.
I think you are not understanding what they are saying & that is why you are frustrated... Buildings do not collapse from a huge gapping gash from falling debris... They might partially collapse, like in Oklahoma, but they do not fall into dust...
Says who you? And what is your expertise? Are you a structural engineer like the hundreds who worked on the NIST report? Plus the hole was one of the factors the buildings were also experiencing a raging inferno that went completely unfought.
Thomas, there's no convincing these truthers. It's like trying to convince creationists. Don't worry, most of us aren't RETARDED, (and I hope these MORONS are offended), let them start their little movement or their revolution or whatever, and I'll be waiting at my door with my fully loaded AK-47 to blast away ANY of these fucking hippies.
They're worse than creationists at least creationists only hurt themselves with their ignorance but these assholes hurt the U.S. by making people think that the gravest danger to the national security of this republic (the global jihad) doesn't even exist. They are to unbelievable to take seriously yet many people do take them seriously that is why I strike them up to being propagandists for the fucking enemy.
what about the rest of bldg 7, the part that WASNT on fire or damaged by debris? how come that part collapsed in perfect timing with the burning, damaged part??????
Show me. You are reading that stuff but there is no proof.You are an idiot. You are bullshit you have not given any facts except what you were told or you read or your mommy told you. JUst shut up and keep wasting your parents money on an education that you will never use. IDIOT
Sry but every word you have spoken is indeed without doubt bs.
Like people before me have said you just repeated the "official reports".
Ignorant people like you is a direct result of their doing. They keep the massa's dumb or/and confused. It is really scary to realise that we live in a polyarchy.
"There is no crueller tyranny than that which is perpetrated under the shield of law and in the name of justice."
As for you Thomas Locke WAKE UP for a change!!! You poor sheep..
Why didn't the building topple over, or lean to the south where it was damaged so badly? If you were to knock out two legs of a chair would you expect it to topple over or fall in on itself? Building 7 falls straight down rather than toppling over and ideed the roofline falls at freefall speeds. For the roof to make it's way to the footprint it has to travel through 47 stories of beams, floors, concrete and yet we see that all these things are providing no resistance to the roof
I think the guy in the video blew up WTC7. He seems to be getting a little nervouse there. I think he is hiding something. I find it funny that people explain that the twin towers collapsed as a result of fire and structural damage to the core columbs caused by the plane strikes and fuel, yet both towers and WTC7 all collapsed Exactly the same way, at free fall speed, and into thier own footprints and that doesn't strike some people as strange? Wake up!
Yet buildings which were closer and received more damage are still standing?
WTC 7 was brought down by controlled demolition, it fell at "free fall" speed genius. 6.6 seconds to be exact.
Did you notice the "classic crimp" in the middle of the building? Take it from a demolitions expert...and the numerous media outlets reporting the building had already fallen, when the damn thing is still standing in the background?
You must be a retard!! Why don't you start up a Demolition company and use Kerosene to Crumble Skyscrapers into the path of the most resistance while ignoring the laws of Psysics? And if you want to argue damage then just rent a wrecking ball and take a few whacks at it before lighting it on fire?? That should do the trick, right?? I mean if it was done 3 times for the first and last time in History
people can i ask u a question who the fuck is this fuckin guy lol they were told to pull the building...asshole. and its not truthers u retard its just common sence...what the fuck is wrong with you that you stick to these people's side you dont know shit ur in ur dorm room u get no pussy..i know ur bored go fuck ur self...stop thinking u know anything about this shit go suck a bush dick
Go read YOUR FEMA reports again. The firefighters had been evacuated for hours before. The fire commander denied any conversation with Silverstein. Silverstein was politely asked who he had spoken with just to clear things up because the fire commander denied the conversation. Silverstein conveniently says "next question". Should I point the PROOF out to you?
Tell your drunken parents to STFU!!
drummer4theperish 3 months ago
The experts cant explain it so its very likely this cubby person on youtube with an annoying TV sounds in the background... NIST has asked others to explain it cause they sure can't...
blakkelure 6 months ago
Comment removed
SteelHorseRiders 6 months ago
LOL you have no idea what you are talking about. WoW, you can read(barely) an erroneous report that even NIST concedes is nowhere near conclusive...
What's your degree in fatass? Birthday Cake?
splendid1000 10 months ago
WTC& was supposed to be hit by the plane out of JFK - but that didn't go to plan.
So they brought it down before dusk to stop the charges being seen in the dark and to stop the pre planted explosives being found - who the fuck hasn't worked that out yet?
spacehopperballs 1 year ago
such a lame load
NIST said 7 came done due to office fires - not the damage
Ok how long did it take them to say that?
spacehopperballs 1 year ago
@spacehopperballs yes hes right and your wrong you twoofers! they where raging fires thats why people can stand next to them for over 20 minutes! damn twoofers and your fuckin god damn commen sense!.....
TheWeaponsmith69 1 year ago
pownd
kenneth1795 1 year ago
anyone with a brain can see that 47 story buildings dont turn it to dust and fall at the speed of gravity from fire evan the twin towers witch turnd into dust magicly witch are 72 story buildings the just fucken evaparated into there own foot prints like that. i think its safe to say that 1 of his family works for the NWO and is about to get hung out too dry and hes all but hurt about it. alass youv only proven won thing that retards shouldnt breed
kenneth1795 1 year ago
@kenneth1795 Conspiracy theorists are pathological liars and are inherently afraid of their own shadow. To them, its impossible to believe the simplest solution is the correct one, instead, they take the details they wish to use, forget the ones that don't apply, misquote people, use conclusions that use no facts, references, observations To them, its easier to blame the enemy they know (the U.S government), rather than the enemy they do not know and can not identify or locate
romans52345 7 months ago
dude your a tard you should go too to the UN take off all your close and scream out loud i would like too be ass raped frist dumby then shoot your self
kenneth1795 1 year ago
30 story building on fire. No collapse. watch?v=nH5-DpMObGc&feature=sub
iso56k123 1 year ago
Keep drinking your fluoride water and everything will be A-OK!
helpendthefed 1 year ago
lol. You haven't explained anything. How is a hole in the side of a building going to cause it to collapse in its own footprint at freefall speed?
SonnyDelight55 1 year ago
What an idiot ! Shit for brains ! PEACE though
frenkynofuzz 1 year ago
i've got a question for you - do you think that challenging the government's explanation for a cataclysmic event that is being used as the justification for endless wars and the curtailment of civil liberties is somehow... unamerican? You still looking for those WMDs?
freedomaintfries 1 year ago
that´s just a stupid explanation.How come you havent found osama bin laden yet?do you think you will ever find him?and your goverment started this al Queda shit anyways.bin laden handpicked 19 guys to hijack 4 planes with boxcutters,I understand that you wanna defend your country and i don´t blame you for that.But poeple over there seems to just buy everything they hear on tv these days.It´s a stupid story that makes no sense.how many innocent poeple have your goverment killed by starting wars?
robbirotta 1 year ago
Peace?? your as about as black as the Pillsbury Doe Boy. Please explain the molten metal you opinionated fuck
NeilCrouse 1 year ago 7
you want to know what Silverstein meant by pull it?? go to google, type in "pull it" and click on the first link that pops up. READ dumbasses.
Origin305 1 year ago
@blackjerryboymetal
one more thing, for someone who thinks truthers are such dumnies and have no case, you sure as hell spend alot of time speaking out against them. If truthers are so stupid why do you waste so much time? I think I know exactly where you are coming from.
Origin305 1 year ago
@blackjerryboymetal
didnt hear them say that, Im pretty sure I heard the testimony of teh firefighters clearly saying they heard explosions. BOOM, BOOM , BOOM while the building was collapsing. Pull it has been used for demolition. Do your research mam.
Origin305 1 year ago
@Origin305 Reasearch Reasearch Reasearch!!! is that the only word conspiracy theroists know?? Jesus
romans52345 7 months ago
@blackjerryboymetal
I would put my money on Dr Steven Jones knowing a hell of alot more than you know.
I bet you are one of those fagots who is going to bend over when uncle sam tells you he wants anal. Fagot.
Origin305 1 year ago
@blackjerryboymetal
you're an idiot, just ignore the fire fighters and rescue workers who heard explosions. Not to mention the owner of the WTC saying over radio to "pull it."
I dont complain in the streets. Infact I dont complain at all. Instead I support further investigation, especially into the better hypothesis which was completey ignored by the governments official inestigation. Science should have not rules out the better hypothesis.
Origin305 1 year ago
@blackjerryboymetal
not to mention there were many eye witnesses who heard explosions. Fire Fighters included.
Origin305 1 year ago
@blackjerryboymetal
dude your an idiot. You dont even need such a powerful explosion to start the thermite reaction which cuts through metal and melts steel. Maybe that explains why they found traces of the stuff in the debri and why they found melted steel on the bottom of all three buildings. People do yourself a favor and wake up. Look up Dr Steven Jones for yourselves. Dont let his testimony be silenced by thugs.
Origin305 1 year ago
@blackjerryboymetal
used to be on your side a week ago. After watching the videos covering Dr Jones, I can no longer agree with the official explanation the government gave on the collapses of the WTC 1,2, and 7. too much evidence supports prepositioned explosives using thermite
Origin305 1 year ago
your explanation for the collapse of WTC7 defies the laws of physics.
Origin305 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
you are a joke!
mlkbeat 1 year ago
you are a joke!
mlkbeat 1 year ago
man are you stupid....! was that little masturbation supposed to close the door on building 7 for good...??? hahahaha
72simba 1 year ago
911 was a United States initiated, United States executed treasonous action against americans and humanity. It was ordered by George Bush and rich american and Israeli jews to assist and usher in Legislation to ease the transition of a one world government. We are done here. These are the facts son and they are..undisputed.
On a side note fat ass you have a bologna for a brain, you are an american, the lowest form of life on this planet. There isnt room for humans AND americans on my earth.
699backstab 1 year ago
@699backstab
theres no need to be upset about americans. Its not our fault the the media is bias. I just recently came to learnd of Dr Steven Jones a week ago. Thats because the news doesnt cover him very well.
Not all americans agree with their government. Your comment devides those among the truth because a great majority of them are americans and you just insulted them all.
Origin305 1 year ago
You sounded much more intelligent when you cursed and had that annoying noise on in the background, thanks,
IAlwaysAskQuestions 2 years ago
i wonder if u even kno what was WTC 7? in it was the fbi, secret service, various govt centers, it was even guiliani's supposed safe house so it should b probably 1 of the safest & strongest facilities in NYC! now u tellin me a little bit of debris & limited fire caused the massive instantaneous collapse of the entire WTC7? so which sound mor like bull? i mean if u put 2 & 2 together, we c that there r people who would much rather c the destruction of such a building- ie criminals not foreign
imbrd 2 years ago
@imbrd
yup I agree
Origin305 1 year ago
If the fires in WTC 1 and 2 were so hot how was it that a woman who is named Rachel was able to walk through the impact area and wave for help in the opening made by the airplane?
If you doubt this just google.."Woman waving from WTC 1".
For someone who just walked through a raging inferno she manages to not be burned.
Sadly though she lost her life minutes later.
ARBuilder1776 2 years ago
lmao!
dood doo the math and the science it DOES NOT FUCKING ADD UPP... OUR CONSPIRACY THEORY SOUNDS WAY BETTER YOUR SONSPIRACY SAYING THAT DEBREE FROM THE TOURS THAT HAPPEND TO BE MILES AWAY FLEW ALL THE WAY OVER THEERE AND KNOCKED IT DOWN LMAO
CocainePolitics 2 years ago
Can a 110-story skyscraper collapse straight down through the path of maximum resistance and disappear into complete powder and dust?
The answer is no. It defies Newtons second law of motion.
accersitusmaximus 2 years ago
turn off the tv
snapkat 2 years ago
This dude is hilarious!
niverent 2 years ago
Falling debris and raging infernos do not cause 47 story sky scrapers to collapse at free fall speed straight into their own footprint....nor did you care to mention the molten steel at all 3 bases of the towers. Fire is 1000 degrees short of liquifying structural steel which melts at 2700 degrees fahrenheit, erego fire didnt cause its collapse.
Lawrencium2222 2 years ago
This is hilarious.
You are sitting there reading off of a website pretending to know what the fuck your talking about and claiming debunk status. Thats called plagiarism friend you get an F.
and also...because surely whoever this video was intended for didnt explain the anomalies of building 7I will elaborate.
Lawrencium2222 2 years ago
This guy is a total LOSER! Brainless US generation.
nobleprince007 2 years ago
Time to move out of you mommys basement and think about girls or something. Maybe do some research and you will see how obvious it is your goverment planned all of 9-11
I hope your not going to start to cry, is mommy around to hold you
zosk57 2 years ago 3
This kid lives in Florida, there aren't any basements in Florida, dumbass. YOU'RE probably in your Mommy's basement, wearing a tinfoil hat and whacking off to 'Loose Change' all day long.
petergriffinsawesome 2 years ago
So they designed WTC7 as a bunker type facility for a 9/11 type of circumstance and they fatally designed each column to hold 2000 feet of floor space? hahhahaha
Lets here you explain away the Law of Conservation of Momentum because that law as well as several others were broken that day when building 7 collapsed.
Anyone that holds a physics degree knows something is wrong with the fall time. Second, hydro carbon fires will never ever melt steel.
The one spread disinfo is you Thomas Locke!
F4O4U4R4S 2 years ago
They did in deed mess up the construction of that building by relying on so few support beams. People f-up from time to time and sadly, that building was one of them. They placed a high preasure gas line at the base of the building, right where debris from the tower struck it. This caused a chain reaction which took out at least one of the connected generators. The exploding generator would've sent a brief power surge, causing the transformers in that building to explode.
stbays 2 years ago
So then WTC7 was the 3rd building in the history of mankind to fall due to fire, in the same city, on the same day, to dive symmetrically into its own footprint at freefall speed?
Of course the first 2 buildings, WTC1,2 experienced the same thing.
Only in America could this be achieved!
INSIDE JOB WRITTEN ALL OVER IT.
Physics says inside job, you must not believe in physics, or, you believe the USA can just turn physics on and off whenever they need it!
F4O4U4R4S 2 years ago
You're leaving out all sorts of information. Building 7 wasn't built like traditional building. I'm gonna assume you mean "steel framed building" and not just building, cause millions of buildings fall due to fire. It's the steel type that got people wondering. However as I said, the building was uniquie. It contained only 3 steel struts as weight baring points. It also had several generators fed by a high preasure gas line. The gas line was ignited by falling debris.
stbays 2 years ago
First of all, maybe turn down the tv before you make a vid, just a tip. Second, your not explaining much, your just regurgitating the official BS story back to us. U wanna explain something why don't you tell us why there was molten metal underneath the WTC7, or why everyone knew this bldg was coming down: (firefighters, Giuliani, the BBC, Silverstein,etc.) or why WTC bldgs 3, 4, 5 & 6 which were all closer in proximity to 1 &2, had far worse debris and fire damage but all remained standing..
hmessier 2 years ago
Did any of those buildings have three gas generators on the lower level?
stbays 2 years ago
gs generators cannot cause structuaral failure of a steel frame building no matter how it was designed to hold its weight. sorry you fail horribly. gas explosions cause momentous force but not enough to cause a free fall of a building, or if it somehow did that explosive force would have to be directed at syncronous points in order to achieve that vacuum effect. go eat some more freedom fries
runelord37 2 years ago
Are you a structural engineer? Cause if not, I'd say my theory is as good as yours.
I don't think those explosions brought it down alone; I think they added to what the fires were doing.
stbays 2 years ago
And here's a video of a fire department Lieutenant saying he's gonna take down Bld. 7 if it doesn't fall on it's own. How fucking nice. I wonder how he was going to do that. And since when did the fire department start taking down towers? Sort of goes hand in hand with Silverstein's PULL IT. You de-bunkers need to find a new line of work. watch?v=uEDbzC8Rork
HemiHead66 2 years ago
Larry referred to pulling the efforts to save the building along with the fire fighters.
I have a fine job. Debunking you all is a fun hobby cause it's so easy. Like your video, it's just a fire fighter stating the obvious. You got a building with massive damage. Since they knew it was going to come down eventually, they wanted to make sure it wasn't a day or so later when people might be in the area cleaning. However it came down on it's own.
stbays 2 years ago
Tell that to the now 700+ architects and engineers who want a new investigation into 9/11 (meaning they doubt the official story).
It's obvious that you have no college degree of any kind.
merrimac291 2 years ago
What a cleaver and witty come back. Clearly because I disagree with you, I must have no real education. You're right, I don't have any college degrees cause I haven't bothered working towards one. Instead, I've taken classes to enrich myself. For my hard work, I have a total of 51 credit hours, most of which are computer classes (hardware, programming, etc).
9/11 was the largest attack on US soil ever and naturally people want to believe we're more secure then we actually were.
stbays 2 years ago
What a shit for brains moron you are. How the hell did they know the building was going to fall down? And that building didn't have massive damage. You want to see massive damage, take a look at 3-4-6. They were pulverized to death and still didn;t fall down. And what the hell do you mean by = they knew it was going to come down eventually and wanted to make sure it wasn't a day or so later? Here, take a look at Bld. 5. I'm dying to hear your know it all answer on this one. watch?v=3fjAkZpnSO0
HemiHead66 2 years ago
First of all, I don't think I insulted anyone, so please try to keep this civil.
Second, there's more then enough video with people saying there were signs that the building would come down.
Building 5 apepared to be 5 to 7 floors tall (a guess). I can't talk about it's construction designs cause I've never looked them up. However I can say it's almost certainly a different type then building 7. Building 7 was 47 floors tall as well. It's all about weight.
stbays 2 years ago
Building 7 had hardly any damage from debris. A hunk of steel stuck in the face of the building and a few small fires isn't enough to make a tower fall to the ground flat as a pancake in one shot. Look at this video of Bld. 5. This thing was pulverized to death, engulfed in flames from top to bottom and it still didn't fall down. watch?v=3fjAkZpnSO0
HemiHead66 2 years ago
The building had damage right where the three desiel generators were located. They caught fire, blew up, disrupting the electical grid, causing the transformers to overload, and eventually the heat and explossions took out the support columns. That and the fact that none of the buildings actually fell at "free fall speed" proves there were no bombs.
stbays 2 years ago
dbl noob
sirreal6 2 years ago
Oh look, another inbred with a camera.
merrimac291 2 years ago
What you mean, I don't see you any where...
stbays 2 years ago
Here is some spam...you're an idiot!
dondalle 2 years ago
The fact that 7 was hit by falling debris serves as evidence itself of explosives in wtc1 and 2. enormous amounts of materials were blown outward which would not be part of a "pan cake" or "tamper" scenario. only explosives have the ability to pulverize 500,000 tons of steel and reinforced concrete in the blink of an eye. THINK
bcz1515 2 years ago 5
why did wtc 7 collapse from falling debris yet wtc 3,4,5,6 did not. they were hit by just as much or more falling debris and also had fires. where is the evidence of this raging inferno burning inside wtc 7? every video clip ive ever seen shows only small fires burning on a few floors, not to mention that fire is incapable of causing a perfectly symmetrical collapse at nearly freefall speed. It would be the 3rd time in history that happened, the first 2 being earlier that day, right next door.
bcz1515 2 years ago
Comment removed
UnpluggedTruth 2 years ago
You're just a cigarette smoking dummy.
JohnnyHorton 2 years ago
poor explanation. You havent explained anything
usa91nick 2 years ago 3
Haha Jesus femas gonna have to get a bigger cofin for your fat ass
CHECK OUT THIS LINK IF YOU HAVE ANY DOUBTS /watch?v=mzXX_UgDhgo
ParanoidAndroid001 2 years ago
Dylan Avery is much more convincing than your fat ass
FK777FK 2 years ago
Hey fat boy... get off the couch and do something productive! You think falling debris caused this building to collapse in 6.5 seconds??? Listen man, do yourself a favor and take this video off youtube... You obviously do not know what you are talking about and your making as ass out of yourself...
jjmurph22290 2 years ago
everything you was wrong, your not funny
QymLym 2 years ago
hahahaha this kid is fucking retarded, his explaination has no scientific relevance what so ever, kids like him are the reason inbreeding is illegal
Maumer1035 2 years ago
Yep I guess the NIST has no scientific merit because that's where I got the information, your explanation of "hey it looks like a controlled demolition" is a fucking joke as are you twoofer faggot Timothy Mcveigh wannabe proto-fascist loser.
ThomasLocke1789 2 years ago
@ThomasLocke1789 Of course NIST could never have been corrupted & there are no banking familes & other powerful families that have controlled the world for centuries (if not milleniums) that could have controlled the NIST explanation! What a crazy idea! By the way, have you seen the video footage of the collapse of WTC 7?
Boxcutter7 1 year ago
@ThomasLocke1789 the 'explanation' that you offered in this video lasted from .37 to 1.05. Your explanation was 28 seconds long--28 seconds out of 109. Most of the 'explanation' (I was actually looking for a sound refutation) was you blathering on about how pissed you are at your opponents in this argument. You should choose a different user name, as Locke is probably spinning in his grave.
steelyman40 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ThomasLocke1789 would you support a new investigation into the murders of 3000 Americans?
MilitaryMind4409 1 year ago
lol is this fat fuck for real?
darveaux 3 years ago 2
Yes, I'm afraid he is. But, just think of how much fertelizer this sack of human waste will produce for our crops after we take care of him and his ilk in the second american revolution. The depression is comming everyone.
biped19 2 years ago
Bring it twoofer faggot, I've still got my 2nd amendment rights, so I'll put a bullet in your fucking head if you ever try to infringe upon my natural right of life.
ThomasLocke1789 2 years ago
YOU GOT NOTHING...You dirty fat fuck. The fascist/corporate/ bank government that you so love will take your gun and throw you into a detention camp. Who do you think they are going to come for first shithead? You think just because you spew their putrid agenda they will spare you? You will die for the will of the American empire. Stop quoting the founders.
biped19 2 years ago
Lol no I will die for the republic in defense against proto-fascist little faggots like you so why don't you go jerk off to the Turner Diaries again you Timothy McVeigh wannabe piece of shit? I will fucking kill you if you ever come after me and mine so fucking bring you fascist fuck!
ThomasLocke1789 2 years ago
yeah...that`s like what the Bush Administration violated.
rorymarin 2 years ago
@ThomasLocke1789 It's funny how you & others say "twoofer", making fun of the word "truther" & simultaneously making fun of its base word "truth".
Boxcutter7 1 year ago
" Alright, first of all...World Trade Center collapsed because of freaking, falling debris from the collapsing showers 1 and 2, alright."
-Genius! Now we know what really happened...haha
Beacom1sm 3 years ago
you are fat and stupid.
have a nice day.
montrazvan89 3 years ago 3
Who the fuck records a video with the TV on in the background? Idiots.
Your explanation for WT7 is unsubstantial. You offer nothing more than the official explanation which STILL does not explain how the building collapsed in such a symmetric, demolition-like, manner.
Anyone with an atom of intelligence can see the resemblance to controlled demolishment in the collapse of WT7.
podge187 3 years ago
your explanation sucks, doesn't make sense. fire took down a steel building at free fall rate? ya bud. ok. I hope you enjoy your smoking.
maplejib 3 years ago
Perhaps you should take a look at the OK city bombing of the Murrah federal building and ask yourself why that building remained standing? Why did 5 and 6(which were more heavily damaged)remain standing yet 7 fell? If ignoring of the all the "coincidences" involved with the 911 attacks makes you feel better then all I can say to you is I'm sorry. We were attacked, that fact remains, I'm just not sure it was by the people that we were told did it and Im not subscribing to the "Official report".
fraziermachine 3 years ago
congrats thomaslocke ur a douchebag! continue to kill urself with that cig cuz it makes u look so much cooler while trying to convince people how wtc7 came down.
audiorage25 3 years ago
To ThomasLocke..
So funny. You keep talking about presenting facts, but I still haven't heard or seen ANY fact from you. None, supported by sources that is. You saying something is fact, doesn't make it so.
Question to you: What is your professional background, that makes your statements so much more valid than anyone else?
ozswede74 3 years ago
fuckin idiots love to coin catchwords like "truther" , you have the logic of infants. are you guys really so in fear of a government without concience? it is scary... but not so scary as your refusal to stare cold hard facts in the eye. wt7 in inexplixacle by any other means than controlled demolition.
runelord37 3 years ago
Perhaps on planet twoofer, but here in reality it is explained by a 10 story hole in the south facade of the building and fires that went unfought for 7 hours.
ThomasLocke1789 3 years ago
You do know that the NIST report you so highly value has said, 6 months ago, that the hole in the building had nothing to do with the collapse?
It's time for you to start studying again because you come off as a bit of an idiot, insulting everyone when it's very clear you're uninformed.
A good starting point is trying to realize you know absolutely nothing, it works a lot better than trying to pose like you know everything.
Ab4kus 3 years ago
I hope the guy on this video will live to bitterly regret his brainwashed and stupid, unexperienced teenage FOXNEWS-staged neocon-bullshit view on the world!
Angelsgaard 3 years ago
He's not a teenager, you truther idiot. He's 26-27 yrs old.
screwmichaelmoore 3 years ago
Fuckin chill.
He looks and acts like one so he fooled us. Fuck off with your attitude.
And don't be a verbally abusive prick to people who try to offer information that nobody in this country even does themselves the favor of looking at. Go to sleep you vindictive ignorant-ass American, and put your head back in the sand. It being an inside job is all over other intelligence agencies and common knowledge in these agencies... they're laughing at us because of people like you.
brodudesnsupras 3 years ago
Death to all truthers! THEY should've been in those damn towers that day!
screwmichaelmoore 3 years ago
Um, are you fucking MENTAL?
brodudesnsupras 3 years ago
I wish I could see you on the street just to first tell you the supposed bullshit and after I am done with that I am gona smear actuall bullshit on your computer in hope you never use it to spout stupid shit and deciet given to by non other than mainstream media. Its ok im still sure after your done cleanin the shit your gona make another video to piss off more people and make you look like more than just the huge waste of space you are.Also peace is gone thanks to people who dont ask questions.
truth357 3 years ago 2
Dude, how much did they pay you to say all this crap.
moh2o 3 years ago 2
How do you explain the thermite reidues at ground zero. Steven Jones (physics prof, BYU) gives a presentation where he uses a little method called NMR (nulear magnetic resonance) spectrophotometry to prove the presence of thermite.
des070776 3 years ago 2
you a stupid fat motherfucker, you are dump sheep. open books you sick fuck and stop reading all the BULLSHIT they say. Stop sucking dicks. Stop being an ignorant bitch. Do RESEARCH. AND STOP SMOKING, YOU'RE FAT ENOUGH TO GET A HEART ATTACK.
rymen 3 years ago 4
How has this fag smoking tosser magaged to explaind WT7 nine months before the official report came out. On who's behalf is he speaking?
MistaEks 3 years ago
"nine months before the official report came out", he posted this video on November 8, 2007.
screwmichaelmoore 3 years ago
Do your sums dude. The official report on WT7 came out a couple of months ago..... or were you too busy screwing Mr Moore to notice.
MistaEks 3 years ago
No, I HAAAATE Mr. Moore, dumbass.
screwmichaelmoore 3 years ago
you look like a fatter version of sean hannity so it shouldnt suprise anyone that you are a dumbass sheeple retard...quit eating you fat fuck...
orbit639 3 years ago
wow fatass, you are great a regurgitating the same ol' bullshit...quit eating you fat fuck....
orbit639 3 years ago
ShaggyTheClown17 3 years ago 3
very clever
chrisswansea2 3 years ago
Too bad most of those aren't present. The funny thing is the pictures show the "sliced steel" was from the clean up crew.
Free fall would've been 92 seconds. The towers fell for roughly 14 seconds and 22 seconds.
WTC 7 was far from sudden and had become obvious hours before it fell.
In a real CD, there are explosive flashes at every level BEFORE the collapse.
The eye witnesses heard, not saw explosions. These explosions could've been overloaded transformers.
stbays 2 years ago
Oh so your basing your version on "could have been"?
WOW that's very scientific.
So if it could have been transformers then it also could have been explosives.
See how that works?
ARBuilder1776 2 years ago
I offered you a more rational explination then the Truthers have offered so far. It seems to be a popular sport amongst Truthers to completely ignore the more rational theories and go straight for the ones that support their government hating notions. No one has ruled out the transformers and from what I've heard from eye witness testimoney, it's more likely them. They said the explosions were followed by a crackling sound. Doesn't that fit a transformer overload a lot better then CD exploves?
stbays 2 years ago
How many transformers have you been around when they exploded? 1? 100?
I have seen eye witness testimony from firefighters who where in the building that said they saw "molten lava" coming down the stairwell. That would support the claim that Thermite was used to melt and weaken steel support beams in the towers.
Traces of this Thermite material, which burns 3 times hotter than jet fuel can burn even under ideal conditions have been found on debris from WTC 1 and 2.
ARBuilder1776 2 years ago
I've seen a few in real life and a few videos of them exploding on Youtube. They sound exactly like bombs going off with one difference. After exploding, a crackling sound can be heard. Just like the witnesses described.
Thermite was ruled out because it can't cut through steel beams. And please don't try the "nano-thermite" angle as that stuff doesn't actually exist. It's a theoretical substance that hasn't actually been made yet.
stbays 2 years ago
9.2 seconds*
stbays 2 years ago
4. And most importantly, to set up the US to go to war under false pretenses, just like EVERY other war starting with WW1 in US history. Not only war, but a war unlike any other that will have never have a visible end. That way we can fight forever making people richer.
Socialism NOW!
Capitalism is the true cancer of the World.
swho23 3 years ago
Explaining world trade seven with the official story means jackshit! If the official story were even remotely believable people wouldn't be questioning it. 911 did four things.
1. Got rid of two buildings that were loosing money.
2. Got rid of a ton of evidence about insider trading and other criminal dealings of white collar crimes. (building 7)
3. Made Silverstien a shit load of more money.
swho23 3 years ago
AiresQX4 3 years ago
Thomas, you truely are quite the idiot. I played your explaination a few times and laughed harder with each replay. You're crapping out a bunch of mumbo billshit from your mouth, and your manor screams of someone who has no idea of the meaning behind what he is saying. Please stop embarrasing yourself all over youtube. Thanks for the chuckle though! :)
tedkez 3 years ago 2
What's in it for you, you fat fuck ?
antoinelo 3 years ago
Fools like you shouldn't be allowed to speak anywhere.
ElPeruanoUFO 3 years ago
Read the NIST report. It's a laughing stock of lies. No explosions heard by people? Google "9/11 Explosions" and you'll see witnesses and hear the explosions yourself. NIST LIED. They are a government agency. Government agencies LIE. Government officials LIE. The official story is a LIE. Get it?
felicity5150 3 years ago
Instead of making an fool of yourself, just do one thing for me ... watch "The Power of Nightmares". It's on Youtube. Before you reply to another comment or post another embarassing video, just watch it ... all three episodes. Watch them with open eyes and an open mind. I would be interested in your response. A little light might just start to flicker inside your head ...
BlahBBBlahBlah 3 years ago
WOW you are repeating official bs, that means about as much as all the other bs.
James Quintiere says the investigations were blocked from seeking answers and we need a new independent investigation. He also says that the nist conclusions are not backed up by the evidence they found.
journalof911studies com for some scientific and well sourced papers.
facts and scientific tests mean much more than your uneducated opinion
lisabob22 3 years ago
One side's fucked so it collapses straight down, huh? Shoot yourself.
00EnemyoftheState00 3 years ago 5
Go on a diet!
JoeTube27 3 years ago
What an idiot? You just don't get it do you?
Show me that hole? But you cant! Even if you could it would not explain the way it fell.
Skyscrapers don't collapse at near gravity speed in the path of most resistance with out explosives. They don't and they never will. You can clearly see a sock wave running upward WT7 just as it start to collapse, how do you explain that? Don't bother!
MustacheVerra 3 years ago
Nice try but asymmetrical fires don't cause symmetrical collapses. Meaning that Fires that weaken steel in an asymmetrical pattern don't account for a perfect 7 second collapse into the building's footprint. The building collapses of 9/11 are unpresidented, no steel building in human history has ever collapsed due to fire. plus 9/11 truth is a movement tha aims to ask questions not rant and rave notice the signs that say investigate 9/11. We just want to find out what really happened.
TRUTHRAPPER 3 years ago 5
DR> STEVEN JONES
DankLove9 3 years ago
Open the damn door already! Or turn of the tv or whatever! I can't hear anything you're saying.. Oh nevermind, I just realised I don't give a shit...
steffenla4 3 years ago 2
watch?v=GEPjOi2dQSM&feature=rec-fresh
watch?v=wlGm9ZorT4Q&feature=related
altusaccersitus 3 years ago
Who the fuck are you to explain anything?
WTC 6 was heavily damaged by falling debris because it was standing next to tower one. Still, the remaining structure didn't collapse. WTC 7 was on the other side of the road, only to be lightly scratched by falling debris. No plane, no huge fires and no huge structural damage. Still WTC 7 implodes and collapse straight down. Verizon and the U.S. Post Office standing next to WTC 7 was both untouched. Clearly I have a question.
altusaccersitus 3 years ago 3
You truly are a dumb SOB WTC 6's fires were being fought, and its center of gravity was nothing like WTC 7's because it was nowhere near as tall. And if by "lightly scratched" you mean had a 10 story hole in it which stretched 1/3 across the South Facade and 1/4 into the interior, then ya sure, and not to mention that you are talking about 4 completely different building structures so WTF exactly is your point retard?
ThomasLocke1789 3 years ago
This retard does indeed have a professional background in architecture and structural engineering. What do you do apart from being a computer neard?
1/4 into the interior you say. Can you back this up?
Look at the image/floor plan in your inbox (can't post links here).
It shows "possible extend of debris damage". That is "3 columns that could have "possibly" been damaged". Did this "possible" damage cause all columns in the whole building to collapse simultaneously?
altusaccersitus 3 years ago
I don't fucking know but you can see the collapsing towers hitting it in videos and you can see the hole in the building in pictures:
Buildings hitting wtc 7:
youtube. com /watch?v=IwdD6ERutEI
Fires and huge hole:
youtube. com/watch?v=Afb7eUHr64U
Picture of huge hole:
kolumbus. fi/av. caesar/wtc/wtc7_2. jpg
ThomasLocke1789 3 years ago
Better angle on the collapse hitting WTC 7:
watch?v=h_JHzuVywQ8
ThomasLocke1789 3 years ago
Yes I was like I said their was a hole in WTC 7 caused by collapsing buildings 1&2 which extended 1/3 across the south facade and 1/4 into the interior and this combined with the fires that had gone unfought for many hours brought down the building.
ThomasLocke1789 3 years ago
Then let me dumb it down for you a bit:
Big fucking hole ripped out + fires that went on un-fought for numerous hours = collapsing building.
ThomasLocke1789 3 years ago
your an idiot man, your reading that crap off a bullcrap report, its obvious that 911 was an iside job, they still cant even tell us who did it let alone give a proper explanation to what happened that day, wake up like everyone else.... -peace
baraldosix 3 years ago 2
Um the names of the hijackers have been listed, the conspiracy theories revolving around them are bullshit as if no Muslim person in the world has the same name. And I think I'll believe the report from the NIST which had 100's of experts working on it over some truther faggot website than you very much.
ThomasLocke1789 3 years ago
I think you are not understanding what they are saying & that is why you are frustrated... Buildings do not collapse from a huge gapping gash from falling debris... They might partially collapse, like in Oklahoma, but they do not fall into dust...
dmerasure 3 years ago
Says who you? And what is your expertise? Are you a structural engineer like the hundreds who worked on the NIST report? Plus the hole was one of the factors the buildings were also experiencing a raging inferno that went completely unfought.
ThomasLocke1789 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Thomas, there's no convincing these truthers. It's like trying to convince creationists. Don't worry, most of us aren't RETARDED, (and I hope these MORONS are offended), let them start their little movement or their revolution or whatever, and I'll be waiting at my door with my fully loaded AK-47 to blast away ANY of these fucking hippies.
screwmichaelmoore 3 years ago
They're worse than creationists at least creationists only hurt themselves with their ignorance but these assholes hurt the U.S. by making people think that the gravest danger to the national security of this republic (the global jihad) doesn't even exist. They are to unbelievable to take seriously yet many people do take them seriously that is why I strike them up to being propagandists for the fucking enemy.
ThomasLocke1789 3 years ago
You should be ashamed of yourself you silly Goy.
pranadhana 3 years ago
I really wanted someone to come up with a cogent and even vaguely convincing argument to explain this increasingly inexplicable event.
Still not explained, in any way shape or form.
To use your own phrase: "You're not presenting facts, you're presenting bullshit. Nothing you say has any relevance whatsoever. Peace"
alanpgoodwin 3 years ago
next time you might want to turn the t.v. off.
sandwichTRC 3 years ago 2
what about the rest of bldg 7, the part that WASNT on fire or damaged by debris? how come that part collapsed in perfect timing with the burning, damaged part??????
metalminded 3 years ago 2
EHI you from the video ...
Europe is begging you to jump in the trash and hide because you are fucking pathetic...
why didn´t all the other buildings around WTC block collapse ? why only building 7 ?
saxoniano 3 years ago
Show me. You are reading that stuff but there is no proof.You are an idiot. You are bullshit you have not given any facts except what you were told or you read or your mommy told you. JUst shut up and keep wasting your parents money on an education that you will never use. IDIOT
freedomriver 3 years ago
Sry but every word you have spoken is indeed without doubt bs.
Like people before me have said you just repeated the "official reports".
Ignorant people like you is a direct result of their doing. They keep the massa's dumb or/and confused. It is really scary to realise that we live in a polyarchy.
"There is no crueller tyranny than that which is perpetrated under the shield of law and in the name of justice."
As for you Thomas Locke WAKE UP for a change!!! You poor sheep..
rusjones 3 years ago
Your just spouting the same official "story" over and over, and explanation means actually going into details, in which you do not have.
jedirock 3 years ago
You still did not explain one thing!! LOL What rock did you come out from under.
jedirock 3 years ago
WOW this guy has a report on WTC 7, but his source (NIST) STILL hasnt......
Please show your degree in your next video.
Where is YOUR facts to YOUR theory which has not been explained by YOUR source in prior videos.
You killed yourself. Just because you ate those books doesnt mean you got anything from them.
jordansonmyfeet23 3 years ago
not a tuther, but this guy sucks. cant argue, didn't explain anything, he read something - hey fat smoker, shut up
tomoleary1 3 years ago
Consider this:
Why didn't the building topple over, or lean to the south where it was damaged so badly? If you were to knock out two legs of a chair would you expect it to topple over or fall in on itself? Building 7 falls straight down rather than toppling over and ideed the roofline falls at freefall speeds. For the roof to make it's way to the footprint it has to travel through 47 stories of beams, floors, concrete and yet we see that all these things are providing no resistance to the roof
lookbetween 3 years ago 2
Hmm do I trust fat jew boy here or Steven Jones?
cubeprisioner8 3 years ago 3
I think the guy in the video blew up WTC7. He seems to be getting a little nervouse there. I think he is hiding something. I find it funny that people explain that the twin towers collapsed as a result of fire and structural damage to the core columbs caused by the plane strikes and fuel, yet both towers and WTC7 all collapsed Exactly the same way, at free fall speed, and into thier own footprints and that doesn't strike some people as strange? Wake up!
simonnaylor 3 years ago 2
Yet buildings which were closer and received more damage are still standing?
WTC 7 was brought down by controlled demolition, it fell at "free fall" speed genius. 6.6 seconds to be exact.
Did you notice the "classic crimp" in the middle of the building? Take it from a demolitions expert...and the numerous media outlets reporting the building had already fallen, when the damn thing is still standing in the background?
Explain that one for me please.
johnhart30 3 years ago
You must be a retard!! Why don't you start up a Demolition company and use Kerosene to Crumble Skyscrapers into the path of the most resistance while ignoring the laws of Psysics? And if you want to argue damage then just rent a wrecking ball and take a few whacks at it before lighting it on fire?? That should do the trick, right?? I mean if it was done 3 times for the first and last time in History
you could always depend on the Official story
to back up your claims to your customers..
AiresQX4 3 years ago 2
people can i ask u a question who the fuck is this fuckin guy lol they were told to pull the building...asshole. and its not truthers u retard its just common sence...what the fuck is wrong with you that you stick to these people's side you dont know shit ur in ur dorm room u get no pussy..i know ur bored go fuck ur self...stop thinking u know anything about this shit go suck a bush dick
nycses 3 years ago 4
He told the firechief to pull the firemen out of the building before it collapsed. It is common sense something which you completely lack evidently.
ThomasLocke1789 3 years ago
"Pull it" "And then we watched the building collapse" Yeah that sounds like he was talking about Fire men!! God!! You believe everything!!
AiresQX4 3 years ago
Go read YOUR FEMA reports again. The firefighters had been evacuated for hours before. The fire commander denied any conversation with Silverstein. Silverstein was politely asked who he had spoken with just to clear things up because the fire commander denied the conversation. Silverstein conveniently says "next question". Should I point the PROOF out to you?
Now firefighters are refered to as "it". LOL
Good job fat boy. Keep me laughing.
jordansonmyfeet23 3 years ago
how the fuck did the rageing inferno start queer
johnnythrust55 3 years ago
The falling debris of WTC's 1 and 2.
ThomasLocke1789 3 years ago
Too bad the fires started before any of the towers fell. So there goes that theory.
Ab4kus 3 years ago
larry silverstein said he told the fire department to "pull" building 7 explain that fuck stick.
slither42 3 years ago