Clinton's death count is actually comparable to that of Bush considering he sanctioned the bombing of a pharmaceutical plant in Sudan called Al Shifa that lead to over 10 thousand deaths and counting because when we blew up that plant we destroyed the entire country's supply of malaria medication and since 1998 (when the bombing occurred), that is the approximate death count and we have refused to re-supply them with the medication.
God fucking dammit always The Young Turks. I'm sorry, but most of the views your channel gets is from misleading thumbnails and video titles. Your stories are extremely watery, no one wants to hear either of your opinions, and the stage is a mess. C'mon... Just give us what we are looking for
@Scotish223332 iraq has NOTHING to do with 9/11. Iran DEFINITELY has nothin to do with 9/11. We caught the guy who was allegedly behind the 9/11 attacks who was sitting in pakistan suburbs with his dick in is hand watching tv. although theres an entire movement that insists that 9/11 was an inside job. they bring up good points that should at least call for it to be looked into again. (building 7 etc) but the main reasons we were given for going overseas (WMDs) was a big red white and blue LIE.
@Scotish223332 The point is, as this video suggests They didnt have WMD's and that was the main reason they used as an excuse for going over there. And we KNEW that they didnt. That is a war crime. plain and simple.
@Scotish223332 -- You are to be pitied, but that doesn't absolve you of being despised for your willful obfuscation of facts to justify the indefensible. Even according to your twisted rationale, it STILL can't justify millions of innocents in Iraq, Pakistan & Afghanistan that had nothing to do w/ 911. You deserve profound reproach for having a self-serving, superficial knowledge of US's belligerant, treacherous history of coups, terrorism, treachery & deceit because of arrogant malice.
Millions of innocents? Killing christians and americans out of hatred deserve my sympathy? You think I'm going to cheer for villains who want to enslave me, my family, and my kin because they are too damn barbaric?
Bush is Just a Puppet. Jews Have hijacked & subverted America. The Federal Reserve is Jewish. The media is controlled by Jews,& the government is nearly 70% Jewish. The remaining non-Jewish members of Congress pander to the Jewish lobby AIPAC, and do not represent Americans&that is why we fight all of Israel's wars, even though it is never in this country's best interests.109 locations Jews have been expelled from since 250AD, but it's everyone else's fault.They MUST be expelled from America
I counted only 918; so you lie, you lie. And what kind of name is Cenk? Sounds like some sort of commie name. Wouldn't trust anybody with that kind of name.
Nothing wrong with war if it serves to better the country via resources, territory/glory/power, and technology. This war in iraq was to gain more puppets in the region to (control) the oil supply.
Boris, you are an idiot. Were you watching the news back then? Check this...and several other videos, just as I remember happening...Clinton Iraq War WMD Speech in 1998 Desert Fox Bush Lied? P1
NOTICE THE DATE...1998. It was on the news every time there were inspectors in Iraq, they were not allowed in and it was also stated ON THE NEWS that Saddam kept moving his weapons before the inspectors were allowed in.
You keep trying to blame Bush, but he didn't start anything, he FINISHED IT.
THANK YOU PRESIDENT BUSH FOR LIBERATING MILLIONS OF PEOPLE FROM BRUTAL TYRANNY, FOR SAVING MILLIONS OF LIVES IN AFRICA FROM HIV/AIDS, FOR KEEPING AMERICA STABLE AND PRODUCTIVE AFTER THE WORST TERRORIST ATTACK EVER, AND FOR KEEPING US SAFE. JOB WELL DONE. YOUR LEADERSHIP IS SORELY MISSED.
@Boris82much no it wont...if he liberated them why were people throwing shoes at him? millions in Africa still have aids and hiv nothing he can do really and America was so unstable and if we were safe then how could the terrorist have attacked us....his leadership is thankfully gone
All the politician's lie they no longer listen to the voice of the people, read a good book called "how did things get so crazy in america" find it at amazon.com, the time for a change is now before it's to late
The illegal and immoral invasion and occupation of Iraq was based on the lies of 9/11, which was a FALSE FLAG/INSIDE JOB pulled off by the highest levels of our government; elements of the CIA and FBI, plus Israel.
War is good for the economy?
What the hell is that kind of statement, that we need to KILL humans in order to make our economy hum?
That's the job of the Zionist owned, Jewish run Federal Reserve.
somebody said, that war is good for the economy. Yet, what I don't get, is that from the day we set foot on Iraq in the war, after 9/11. As of February 2010, around $704 billion has been spent based on estimates of current expenditure rates. So, WTF?
@Valkilmer89 It depends how you look at it. For instance, during world war 2, in Britain, employment rose to a point where barely anyone didn't have a job. People unite during war-time, which can essentially be good for the economy. On the flip-side, the amount of money that's pumped into the war effort can topple the economy, for example in Russia, both the world wars and the cold war.
Hi I am from Iraq and trust me this is what saw in Iraq for past 7 year and mabye worse just like US President Franklin Delano Roosevelt said ,,,,I have seen war. I have seen war on land and sea. I have seen blood running from the wounded . . . I have seen the dead in the mud. I have seen cities destroyed . . . I have seen children starving. I have seen the agony of mothers and wives. I hate war."
@bardarash i have shared your experience, fallujah made me cry with anger, 1million dead people dosent equil liberation, listen to lowkey-cradle of civilisation, beautiful song, about iraq and how this war ruined peoples lives living in and out of the country
this reporter is an idiot. bush didn't get people killed for no reason, saying this makes bush supporters think the theory is ridiculous which it is.
bush and various other business men of energy company's made millions from oil and investment off the war. you don't have to be a genius to make that connection. how did this retard get the job ae.
i think the fact that it is out in the open that bush lied... is better than you claim that clinton's lies didn't cause deaths every american president has lied to the public and got away with killing thousands of people bush is the only 1 that has been called out on it by the press...
wow im not the biggest bush fan but this guy is fucking annoying like forreal shut the fuck up your immature as shit. no wonder your not on cnn, fox, or msnbc cuz your annoying, fat, and immature
it's a crime that Obama hasn't prosecuted the Bush's administration for all it's crimes not just against the US but against the Iraqi and Afghanistan people and not just the wars but the corruption of the US government with the corporate criminals..they all should be taken out to sea and pushed overboard after dumping chum into the water until we are sure the water is full of sharks
@xadam2dudex excellent excellent thought but........obama now works for the VERY SAME MASTERS the amorals bush cheyney and rice worked for. globalist trillionaire bankers. this wont change untill americans by the MILLIONS understand this fact and stand up. the ENTIRE bush administration STILL BELONGS BEHIND BARS
@MrHarry46 they are as bad as any Nazi war criminal.. they have blood on their hands..Obama if he wasn't lying to the US people during the campaign was told by those same global masters after he got into office how things work and if he didn't cooperate things can happen not just to him but to his kids etc..don't forget they are above the law both civil and moral codes..don't forget the C Street Family who practice non-christian morals stating god made them above all laws
@bmyze316 after reading a few of your comments its obvious you like using the word "liberal"...much like your icon Slush Limpdick. look...the ENTIRE US GOVERNMENT IS OFF THE LEASH. remember:...this left right wing paragidm is nothing more than two wings of the very same bird, Globalist Bankers! liberal, conservative, whatever, Americans by the MILLIONS must get together and support their very own Hallowed, Sacred US Constitution. first by merely READING IT and understanding what it says.
@xadam2dudex that would be great but you would have to arrest clinton bush snr obama regan carter etc every american president for the last 100 years at least is guilty of terrorism so prosecuting bush while great doesn't get rid of the problem.. america will support terrorism if it's in there own interest to do so.
@giggilamour how many murders have you witnessed in iraq? yu must have been there to witness all of bush's crimes right? or are just another liberal loon shooting off at the mouth from your air conditioned house? do the 29 dems who voted to go hold any responsibility? Is Iraq a better place now?
@bmyze316 PROOF? 100,000+ of murders by the instigation of Evil fuctard Bush and Puppet master Cheney.The Blackwater ethnic cleansing army belongs to Cheney and is funded by Bush!His knowledge of the 911 attack and omitting to warn the people makes HIM the killer.LOuisiana levies wich BUSH REFUSED to properly fix makes HIM the killer of the"Louisianans".The 100,000 INNOCENT iraquis KILLED by Bush to fuel his BLOOD FOR oil war and the 30000+ US soldiers KILLED or BUTCHERED makes HIM the killer...
Congress has the duty to know what they are voting on. They have the same evidence/information the president has. thats a cop out and a pathetic excuse to say they just believed the president. The point i was trying to make was that back then almost EVERYBODY in the world thought iraq has wmd's. that seems crazy to think now but it's true. even 29 democrats believed that. because of the same intel that bush was following.
They don't have the same information as the president. Otherwise why are presidential candidates given special intelligence information when they run? Complete bull right there.
Furthermore, UN inspectors were told to get out by Bush and Bush only. So it is all on him. He could've waited to get all the information, but he was itchy to start the bombing. So it is about time you republicans are accountable for your actions.
@d00derman The invasion of Iraq was arguably the most justified case of military action the U.S. has ever taken. Because it's VERY COMPLEX, the TRUTH has been sabotaged, but not by the Bush Administration or America's allies! Read what Resolution 1441 stated, then chek my link on what the UN felt on 3/7/2003
•Iraq must comply fully with UNSCR 660 (regarding Iraq's illegal invasion of Kuwait) "and all subsequent relevant resolutions."
•Authorizes UN Member States "To Use All Necessary Means to Uphold and Implement resolution 660 and all subsequent relevant resolutions and to restore international peace and security in the area."
@bmyze316 More of a realist when it comes to foreign policy. I definately lean more on the conservative side. That's one of the areas I was somewhat disappointed about with the Bush Administration. But his presidency was filled with alot of tough decisions.
•Iraq must "unconditionally accept" the destruction, removal or rendering harmless "under international supervision" of all "chemical and biological weapons and all stocks of agents and all related subsystems and components and all research, development, support and manufacturing facilities."
@d00derman ( Resolution 1441) # 13. Recalls, in that context, that the Council has repeatedly warned Iraq that it will face "serious consequences" as a result of its continued violations of its obligations; Better go back and read the U.N. Resolutions!
@ResearchForTruth75 "serious consequences"? That's it? That doesn't mean war or even a trigger for war, that can mean any kind of consequence. Anything from embargoes, blockades, or any other political diplomatic punishment. BTW, there is no 'war' in the resolution, maybe you should read it.
There were sanctions against his country, ever hear of the oil for food program? It turned out to be a big UN scandal. EVERYONE at the UN knew "serious consequences" meant military action! Did you read ANY of the links, or do I have to read them for you? Don't be lusk!
"[T]his resolution contains no "hidden triggers" and no "automaticity" with respect to the use of force." John Negroponte, U.S. Ambassador.
"We heard loud and clear during the negotiations the concerns about "automaticity" and "hidden triggers" -- the concern that on a decision so crucial we should not rush into military action;" - U.K. Ambassador
@d00derman 1. Decides that Iraq has been and remains in material breach of its obligations under relevant resolutions, including resolution 687 (1991), in particular through Iraqs failure to cooperate with United Nations inspectors and the IAEA, and to complete the actions required under paragraphs 8 to 13 of resolution 687 (1991);
2. Decides, while acknowledging paragraph 1 above, to afford Iraq, by this
resolution, a final opportunity to comply with its disarmament obligations under
relevant resolutions of the Council; and accordingly decides to set up an enhanced inspection regime with the aim of bringing to full and verified completion the disarmament process established by resolution 687 (1991) and subsequent resolutions of the Council;
2. Decides, while acknowledging paragraph 1 above, to afford Iraq, by this
resolution, a final opportunity to comply with its disarmament obligations under
relevant resolutions of the Council; and accordingly decides to set up an enhanced inspection regime with the aim of bringing to full and verified completion the disarmament process established by resolution 687 (1991) and subsequent resolutions of the Council;
@d00derman 9. Requests the Secretary-General immediately to notify Iraq of this
resolution, which is binding on Iraq; demands that Iraq confirm within seven days of that notification its intention to comply fully with this resolution; and demands5 S/RES/1441 (2002)
further that Iraq cooperate immediately, unconditionally, and actively with
@d00derman 13. Recalls, in that context, that the Council has repeatedly warned Iraq that it will face serious consequences as a result of its continued violations of its obligations;
Don't be a fool, they knew what "serious consequences" meant. This is a pathetic attempt by yourself!
@ResearchForTruth75 Oh no: "Syria voted in favour of the resolution, having received reassurances from its sponsors, the United States of America and the United Kingdom, and from France and Russia through high-level contacts, that it would not be used as a pretext for striking against Iraq and does not constitute a basis for any automatic strikes against Iraq."
@ResearchForTruth75 Plus, the UN didn't enter the conflict, neither did the Permanent and Temporary Security Council members except for the UK and US. If they knew they had to support military action, like you claim, why weren't they in the coalition?
@d00derman They didn't enter because one no vote nullifies everything, and we know Russia, Germany, and France, all of whom made major kickbacks from Saddam being in power, were asking for more time for inspectors. Was this an attempt to move material out of Iraq? Maybe. Public Law 107 243 It's the law of your country. Take notice what it says. Sorry pal, but any way u look at it, you're wrong.
@ResearchForTruth75 That is the biggest non-sequitur I have seen yet. First off, Germany wasn't on the Security Council during the vote. Next, if Russia and France did receive kickbacks like you said, why did they vote yes? Another point, it's the most damning evidence yet, Syria on the Temporary Security Council voted yes, and an Arab nation would never vote yes on this resolution if it entailed military action on another Arab nation.
@d00derman You are so thick! You are the one twisting words. Resolution 1441 was passed unanimously by the 15 members of the security council. It declared Iraq to be in "material breach" of the 16 previous UN Resolutions that had sought to enforce the truce which ended the Gulf War. The SC ruled Iraq had broken the terms of the truce and was in violation of international law.
@d00derman UN SC Resolution 1441 was also an ultimatum designed to end Iraq's 11 year breaches of agreements by holding out the threat of force. It offered "a final opportunity" to comply or face "serious consequences." Even a staunch opponent of military action as UN chief Hans Blix recognized this ultimatum as "diplomatic language for possible armed action." They also knew because Bush and Blair talked about it often, don't play dumb!
@d00derman The resolution gave Saddam a 30 day deadline to comply. When the deadline passed Blix stated " Iraq appears not to have come to a genuine acceptance, not even today, of the disarmament which was demanded of it and which it needs to carry out to win the confidence of the world and to live in peace."
@d00derman It must also be noted a last minute measure submitted by the US, after Resolution 1441, and less than two weeks before the onset of war. It was submitted at the request of Tony Blair, who was under enormous pressure from the anti-war left. The effort was withdrawn when French foreign minister, Dominique de Villepin told Colin Powell that although France had voted for the original ultimatum, it would now veto any use of force "under any circumstances,"
@d00derman It was totally evident that Russia and China too, both of which were arms suppliers to Saddam and allies that helped him circumvent the UN sanctions would provide vetoes as well. I've just owned you with FACTS of what happened. If you can't understand the reality of that, sorry. At the present time you may be on the popular side of what the public thinks, BUT you are on the WRONG side of the true history as to what happened!
@d00derman It was totally evident that Russia and China too, both of which were arms suppliers to Saddam and allies that helped him circumvent the UN sanctions would provide vetoes as well. I've just owned you with FACTS of what happened. If you can't understand the reality of that, sorry. At the present time you may be on the popular side of what the public thinks, BUT you are on the WRONG side of the true history as to what happened!
We now know, however, that giving Blix a few more months would not have made a difference. Last month Kay was asked what would have happened if Blix and his team had been allowed to continue their mission. "All I can say is that among an extensive body of Iraqi scientists who are talking to us, they have said: The U.N. interviewed us; we did not tell them the truth, we did not show them this equipment, we did not talk about these programs; we couldn't do it as long as Saddam was in power.
Well im not sure if you are a conservative or not but too many conservatives today look to the founders for everything except foreign policy and that is hypocritical. ww1, korea, vietnam, and iraq were all mistakes. we should stay out of other peoples business.
the fact of the matter is we are in 130 countries today. its expensive and it creates more enemies, not to mention it leaves those forces vulnerable and spreads us out. bring everyone home and militarize space
@bmyze316 Almost everybody in the world thought there were WMDs in Iraq? Thats a lie. some intell. agencies said there were WMDs in Iraq but there were many agencies who said there weren't any.
@Braves0056 the agencies that America trusts thought there was. my only point is that Bush wasn't the only person in america that thought Iraq had wmd's. 29 different democrats voted to go to Iraq but everyone acts like Bush went to Iraq against the will of the people. Iraq had MUCH MORE Bi-Partisan support than Obama's healthcare bill but liberals don't think he did that against the will of the people but Bush who had 29 dem votes did? That doesn't make sense, there is an EXTREME dbl standard
congress is completely separate from the executive branch. Congress wouldn't be doing it's job if they just listened to the president. he is not a king. Bush is at fault, BUT so is congress and the senate.
and if healthcare costs a dollar more than they said ONLY the dems will be to blame. if any rationing of care occurs ONLY dems are to blame.
740 bill. thats still not as much as healthcare!! lol
New england journal of medicine reports that 46% of doctors will leave the profession if healthcare passes.
So we will add 30 millions new patients and take away 46% of the doctors...hmm lets think about this can you say Rationing of care?? imagine the lines at the doctors office!!
waiting 6 months for an x-ray (yeah that happens in europe)
name one bill that cost as much as the government said it would? its not just bush thats where your missing the point. you just want to hate bush.
Bush was a progressive he spent too much...got it. but what does that say about obama?
you liberal loons love to talk about bush, and Iraq. 77 senators voted to go to iraq, 29 dems, they deserve some of the blame as well, RIGHT? if you cant admit that your completely un-reasonable.
@bmyze316 Hahaha. Bush was a progressive because he spent too much. Keep lying to yourself. Reagan had the largest debt since WWII, and taxed the most since WWII. Bush had the largest increase in govt with bailouts, the Iraq War and tax cuts . At least Reagan taxed. Bush put it all on credit. Fiscal Conservative my ass.
although with obamas spending, sending troops to combat, renewing the patriot act, drone attacks, lies, re-signing military tribunals it feels like Bush never left HUH?
LOL wake up dude, obama is just another dirty politician who mis-represented himself during the campaign so he could fly around on air force one.
stop drinking the kool-aid and start to educate yourself on history and what is going on today.
So Obama "mis-represented himself" and Bush flat out lied about WMDs in Iraq, connections to Al Qaeda, and destroyed the economy with tax cuts that didn't work, and you want to talk about kool aid?
You've been lapping up the Rush/Drudge/Hannity instructions to parrots like you since who knows when.
obama said if a president passed healthcare with a 50+1 majority he couldn't govern. now healthcare is being passed in the senate by 51 votes. explain that.
CSPAN-explain that?
he was going to change things in washington and be bi-partisan. but whenever the dems get questioned they say "thats how it's always been done"
YES he mis-represented himself. he was supposed to be DIFFERENT but by his own admission he does things the Same way as every one else wheres the change????
you need a 60 vote majority so the so 56 is still reconciliation. its them same thing you clown.
and i never said bush was a fiscal conservative. i agree with the bush critics, but that doesnt give obama a free pass does it? bush was wrong to go to iraq. i dont think we should go to war unless we are attacked. period. just like the founders inteded. so please stop talking about bush like i am a fan.
Stop defending Bush like you're a fan and maybe people won't get the wrong impression.
BTW, Reagan and Bush Sr. raised taxes and increased the deficit. Clinton lowered the deficit and the debt. Bush Jr. came in and re-increased the deficit again, and by a large numbers. So there is no such thing as a fiscal conservative. Like the easter bunny or santa claus.
And Barry's(Aka-Barack) has lied how many times to keep us in Iraq. With no plans of taking us out. The global banks who put this puppet(Barry) in office are making too much money off this war to let him pull us out of Iraq. Open your eyes. He's breaking the law(article 1 section 9) by seating himself at the head of the U.N. Security Council(first Pres. to chair the World Body).
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
this is the stupidest crap ever. SO BIASED. at least be a little impartial. I mean sure, you could say Bush lied. But how do we know that there were no WMD originally. The news of Bush's intentions on going into Iraq (which had started about 4 months before we did) was known around the world. How hard would it be for Sadam to have seen that his WMD's were discovered and move them within 4 months. NOT HARD AT ALL.
"when bush lies people die" AS IF HE KNEW PEOPLE WERE GOING TO DIE
iraq is a far better place now? what the hell are you talking about? the unemployment is 80 percent, most areas dont have consistant water or electricity, when a foreign country attacks you, everything goes to hell. these countries had problems before we attacked, but now they've been devestated. we're just there to destroy them and grab the oil. america was a great country but now the corporations control our policies including the plans to attack and fuck up iran.
Please explain how 8 years later we still haven't taken any oil. How countries like China and Russia are getting the oil. Oooooh, you were wrong, I get it.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
The young turds get it wrong again. Bushes quote was dead on, he never said that Iraq was connected to WTC2. Iraq is a far far better place now with the hope of a great future. Liberals just hate that.
redumlicans are liars & scam artists don't listen to shit republicans tell you they lie to get their way, they lie to get elected & reelected & after the election sometimes they even admit they lie as a "fuck you" to everyone.like hahaha we lie & you still vote for us FUCK OFF REPUBLICANS we've had enough. repubs had the congress for 12+ years, pres for 8 and supreme court since the 80s and have only accomplished fucking the world up.. time to let another party have the wheel for a decade or so
Um.. but we won?! The GOP says we already won the war in Iraq. Really? Against a 3rd world nation, the Bush Administration playing with our once proud military like they were toy soldiers are STILL FIGHTING a war in Iraq, after HOW MANY YEARS? They can't even do what daddy Bush said not to do!? Amazing incompetence. Amazing lack of skill. A bumbling bunch of idiots destroying this nations fighting stock, along with our economy. These brainless hacks should be summarily executed for treason!
General comment to you minority-Republicans out there. Your ulcers may be getting worse as you listen, see, and swallow the mountain of evidence confirming that your President (Bush) lied through his teeth to shove this nation into war with Iraq. The facts speak clearly and eloquently. The credibility of every Republican is known. And its ZERO. The only avenue these shameless dolts have left is to attempt, however pathetic, to rewrite recent history. It won't work. We know what happened. Period.
You might presume that the Iraqi's live under more freedom now, but do they have the freedom to demand that US soldiers leave Iraq? No, the army of occupation will not leave until there is no more oil to pump out.
So you really believe that they did not lie about the reason for going to war in Iraq? What do you believe were the reasons for going to war? Spreading democracy? That only came about after they could NOT find any WMD's. Democracy will collapse as soon as we leave.
He will go down in history as one the best presidents if the democracy remains stable, similar to Lincoln cause of the liberation of the slaves. Honestly i don't know if the word democracy was put forth after they failed to find the WMD's but one thing is certain: Bush always had the freedom (or the lack of it) of the Iraqis on his mind from day 1. But no, who cares if the Iraqis live under a oppressive government?
Who cares if they're put in a meat grinder with their feet first?
It does not make any real sense that a president with sky high ratings would deliberately lie about something like that, deliberately making himself look bad. I don't know anyone like that. Do you?
People don't put the casualties of the war into perspective. How many people do you think Saddam has killed? Most probably more casualties have been caused by him than in the war.
I don't know if you have been following the news, but Bush and Cheney are now repeatedly DENYING any connection btwn Saddam and al Qeda. So are you still deluding yourself as to the reasons for going to war?
Yes I heard Cheney denied it the other day. Doesn't mean there never was a connection because there was. Sheeples like to believe otherwise because the mainstream media never reported them.
Google: Interview Exploring Probable Links Between 9/11 and Saddam Hussein
So even when Cheney denies there was a connection, you deny his admission and and say "there might still be one." Wow, talk about not letting facts get in the way of your conclusions.
We fought WWII to prove that Germany could not invade another country and impose their system of govt on another country. Are you aware that the US does NOT have the right to go into another country and change their government? If you think that the we had to right to remove Saddam because he was an oppressive dictator, why aren't we invading Somalia or other countries in Africa that are run by dictators or warlords?
I can't believe many ignorant rednecks still supporting that idiot
folladordeprostis 1 week ago
@folladordeprostis Rednecks > Crack Addicts any day.
Scotish223332 1 week ago
Clinton's death count is actually comparable to that of Bush considering he sanctioned the bombing of a pharmaceutical plant in Sudan called Al Shifa that lead to over 10 thousand deaths and counting because when we blew up that plant we destroyed the entire country's supply of malaria medication and since 1998 (when the bombing occurred), that is the approximate death count and we have refused to re-supply them with the medication.
eboyd32 2 weeks ago
God fucking dammit always The Young Turks. I'm sorry, but most of the views your channel gets is from misleading thumbnails and video titles. Your stories are extremely watery, no one wants to hear either of your opinions, and the stage is a mess. C'mon... Just give us what we are looking for
flonga1 3 weeks ago
Ron Paul 2012, enough said....
LOLYUFAT 1 month ago
O look, mindless bush bashing.
O look over there, a lying liberals called the Young Turks.
Stay away Billy, this is the liberal zone, a blighted wasteland of bad liars and mindless zombies.
Scotish223332 1 month ago
@Scotish223332 oh look, a president who started a 10 year long war based on a lie
Oh look, thousands of twenty something year olds going back their mothers in BOXES.
When you start a war for money and then lie about it, people should be able to bash you all they want. cuz your a fucking war criminal.
bigcheesy95 3 weeks ago
@bigcheesy95 A lie?
Yea, because two planes crashing into the twin towers is just a every day in New York, right?
War? Who needs it when we can bow our heads to our new muslim overlords.
Scotish223332 3 weeks ago
@Scotish223332 iraq has NOTHING to do with 9/11. Iran DEFINITELY has nothin to do with 9/11. We caught the guy who was allegedly behind the 9/11 attacks who was sitting in pakistan suburbs with his dick in is hand watching tv. although theres an entire movement that insists that 9/11 was an inside job. they bring up good points that should at least call for it to be looked into again. (building 7 etc) but the main reasons we were given for going overseas (WMDs) was a big red white and blue LIE.
bigcheesy95 3 weeks ago
@bigcheesy95 You do realize they found yellow cake, right?
Nothing, huh? You do realize Iraq's little government had allied themselves with the terrorists, right?
Interesting point's my nether regions, those nuts are about as legit as Slagar in a civil rights convention.
Scotish223332 3 weeks ago
@Scotish223332 The point is, as this video suggests They didnt have WMD's and that was the main reason they used as an excuse for going over there. And we KNEW that they didnt. That is a war crime. plain and simple.
bigcheesy95 3 weeks ago
@bigcheesy95 An excuse for what?
Is it a war crime to defend your family's life and liberty?
Scotish223332 3 weeks ago
@Scotish223332 An excuse to start a war. And it is a War crime to lie about the reason for starting a war when the only other motive is MONEY.
bigcheesy95 3 weeks ago
@bigcheesy95 Yea, that's why he still lives on a ranch, because he has lots of money.
Scotish223332 3 weeks ago
@Scotish223332 -- You are to be pitied, but that doesn't absolve you of being despised for your willful obfuscation of facts to justify the indefensible. Even according to your twisted rationale, it STILL can't justify millions of innocents in Iraq, Pakistan & Afghanistan that had nothing to do w/ 911. You deserve profound reproach for having a self-serving, superficial knowledge of US's belligerant, treacherous history of coups, terrorism, treachery & deceit because of arrogant malice.
starmanskye 1 week ago
@starmanskye Bold words, hypocrite.
Millions of innocents? Killing christians and americans out of hatred deserve my sympathy? You think I'm going to cheer for villains who want to enslave me, my family, and my kin because they are too damn barbaric?
And you say I should be pitied.
Scotish223332 1 week ago
LOOK UP (s1867) THE TERRORISTS HAVE WON...WE JUST LOST OUR BILL OF RIGHTS!
bart666a 2 months ago 2
Bush is Just a Puppet. Jews Have hijacked & subverted America. The Federal Reserve is Jewish. The media is controlled by Jews,& the government is nearly 70% Jewish. The remaining non-Jewish members of Congress pander to the Jewish lobby AIPAC, and do not represent Americans&that is why we fight all of Israel's wars, even though it is never in this country's best interests.109 locations Jews have been expelled from since 250AD, but it's everyone else's fault.They MUST be expelled from America
4truthjusticefreedom 2 months ago
@4truthjusticefreedom no jewish,zionists!!!
folladordeprostis 1 week ago
I counted only 918; so you lie, you lie. And what kind of name is Cenk? Sounds like some sort of commie name. Wouldn't trust anybody with that kind of name.
jab3785 4 months ago
@jab3785 please tell me your taking the piss
jordanfadestoblack 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
BUSH LIED
IT WAS AN ISIDE JOB
BUSH IS A BIG SHIT
BUSH LIED
AND THAT'S ALL FOLKS!!!
manolino1969 4 months ago
Nothing wrong with war if it serves to better the country via resources, territory/glory/power, and technology. This war in iraq was to gain more puppets in the region to (control) the oil supply.
USAPropaganda 4 months ago
you need to add the youtube address in front of that part of the url or search the title
travelinDame1 4 months ago
Trying again to post the url
watch?v=ps9j22G9HLE
travelinDame1 4 months ago
Boris, you are an idiot. Were you watching the news back then? Check this...and several other videos, just as I remember happening...Clinton Iraq War WMD Speech in 1998 Desert Fox Bush Lied? P1
NOTICE THE DATE...1998. It was on the news every time there were inspectors in Iraq, they were not allowed in and it was also stated ON THE NEWS that Saddam kept moving his weapons before the inspectors were allowed in.
You keep trying to blame Bush, but he didn't start anything, he FINISHED IT.
travelinDame1 4 months ago
Question: Why is Laura Bush alway's on top when they have sex?
Answer: Because George can only fuck up.
cLaX1227 7 months ago 2
@Boris82much GEORGE W BUSH IS THE REASON WHY EVERYTHING YOU JUST STATED HAPPENED! HES A FUCKING WAR CRIMINAL GO SUCK HIS DICK
JamesProable 8 months ago 13
@JamesProable Bush doesn't deserve any blow jobs.
ABC132Acd 5 days ago
THANK YOU PRESIDENT BUSH FOR LIBERATING MILLIONS OF PEOPLE FROM BRUTAL TYRANNY, FOR SAVING MILLIONS OF LIVES IN AFRICA FROM HIV/AIDS, FOR KEEPING AMERICA STABLE AND PRODUCTIVE AFTER THE WORST TERRORIST ATTACK EVER, AND FOR KEEPING US SAFE. JOB WELL DONE. YOUR LEADERSHIP IS SORELY MISSED.
Boris82much 8 months ago
@Boris82much no it wont...if he liberated them why were people throwing shoes at him? millions in Africa still have aids and hiv nothing he can do really and America was so unstable and if we were safe then how could the terrorist have attacked us....his leadership is thankfully gone
BigDJuggalo420 6 months ago
FUCK BUSH
LadyPLo12 10 months ago
All the politician's lie they no longer listen to the voice of the people, read a good book called "how did things get so crazy in america" find it at amazon.com, the time for a change is now before it's to late
concerned7156 11 months ago
When Clinton died, no one died.
JImmy4336 11 months ago
Does someone know where to find an on-line version of that study?
jardabc 11 months ago
If he would tried harder he could complete the 10000 count..
shadowofears 11 months ago
And Obama proudly carries on the Bush lie.
BloodTar 1 year ago
very well said Cenk.
altin2007 1 year ago 2
935 lies about Iraq, no lies about 9/11. Riiiight......
crocfme 1 year ago 2
Bush lied, Ppl died.
Got a nice ring to it.
BadBoo22 1 year ago
The illegal and immoral invasion and occupation of Iraq was based on the lies of 9/11, which was a FALSE FLAG/INSIDE JOB pulled off by the highest levels of our government; elements of the CIA and FBI, plus Israel.
War is good for the economy?
What the hell is that kind of statement, that we need to KILL humans in order to make our economy hum?
That's the job of the Zionist owned, Jewish run Federal Reserve.
LeseMajeste 1 year ago
somebody said, that war is good for the economy. Yet, what I don't get, is that from the day we set foot on Iraq in the war, after 9/11. As of February 2010, around $704 billion has been spent based on estimates of current expenditure rates. So, WTF?
Valkilmer89 1 year ago
@Valkilmer89 It depends how you look at it. For instance, during world war 2, in Britain, employment rose to a point where barely anyone didn't have a job. People unite during war-time, which can essentially be good for the economy. On the flip-side, the amount of money that's pumped into the war effort can topple the economy, for example in Russia, both the world wars and the cold war.
So it's completely debatable
saintofbladez 1 year ago
new slogan: bush lie, people die
awhatzable 1 year ago
the "reporter" I'd rather call him a no talent hack.
ArmoredFelix 1 year ago
This person makes me ashamed that I agree with him. What a fucktard.
ArmoredFelix 1 year ago
@ArmoredFelix the reporter or bush? LOL
PlasmaN0va 1 year ago
we went to invade iraw to find nuclear weapons, very dumb on our parts
salakast 1 year ago
HE LIED TO SAVE HIS SORRY ASS AND TO FINISH WHAT HIS DUMB ASS FATHER COULDNT FINISH BACK IN 1990
Christopher52488 1 year ago
Great dubya impersonation!
xXTurdSandwitchXx 1 year ago
Hi I am from Iraq and trust me this is what saw in Iraq for past 7 year and mabye worse just like US President Franklin Delano Roosevelt said ,,,,I have seen war. I have seen war on land and sea. I have seen blood running from the wounded . . . I have seen the dead in the mud. I have seen cities destroyed . . . I have seen children starving. I have seen the agony of mothers and wives. I hate war."
bardarash 1 year ago 33
@bardarash i have shared your experience, fallujah made me cry with anger, 1million dead people dosent equil liberation, listen to lowkey-cradle of civilisation, beautiful song, about iraq and how this war ruined peoples lives living in and out of the country
iraqiblaze 1 year ago
this reporter is an idiot. bush didn't get people killed for no reason, saying this makes bush supporters think the theory is ridiculous which it is.
bush and various other business men of energy company's made millions from oil and investment off the war. you don't have to be a genius to make that connection. how did this retard get the job ae.
anothermonkeyable 1 year ago
i think the fact that it is out in the open that bush lied... is better than you claim that clinton's lies didn't cause deaths every american president has lied to the public and got away with killing thousands of people bush is the only 1 that has been called out on it by the press...
johnnyd101 1 year ago
He lied alot, because he didn't understand Cheney's instructions.
kenwatch77 1 year ago
wow im not the biggest bush fan but this guy is fucking annoying like forreal shut the fuck up your immature as shit. no wonder your not on cnn, fox, or msnbc cuz your annoying, fat, and immature
AwsomeAndrew2 1 year ago
it's a crime that Obama hasn't prosecuted the Bush's administration for all it's crimes not just against the US but against the Iraqi and Afghanistan people and not just the wars but the corruption of the US government with the corporate criminals..they all should be taken out to sea and pushed overboard after dumping chum into the water until we are sure the water is full of sharks
xadam2dudex 1 year ago
@xadam2dudex excellent excellent thought but........obama now works for the VERY SAME MASTERS the amorals bush cheyney and rice worked for. globalist trillionaire bankers. this wont change untill americans by the MILLIONS understand this fact and stand up. the ENTIRE bush administration STILL BELONGS BEHIND BARS
MrHarry46 1 year ago
@MrHarry46 they are as bad as any Nazi war criminal.. they have blood on their hands..Obama if he wasn't lying to the US people during the campaign was told by those same global masters after he got into office how things work and if he didn't cooperate things can happen not just to him but to his kids etc..don't forget they are above the law both civil and moral codes..don't forget the C Street Family who practice non-christian morals stating god made them above all laws
xadam2dudex 1 year ago
@MrHarry46 what about the 29 democrats that voted to go to war? to they hold ANY responsibility? or is it just big bad bush?
bmyze316 1 year ago
@bmyze316 after reading a few of your comments its obvious you like using the word "liberal"...much like your icon Slush Limpdick. look...the ENTIRE US GOVERNMENT IS OFF THE LEASH. remember:...this left right wing paragidm is nothing more than two wings of the very same bird, Globalist Bankers! liberal, conservative, whatever, Americans by the MILLIONS must get together and support their very own Hallowed, Sacred US Constitution. first by merely READING IT and understanding what it says.
MrHarry46 1 year ago
@xadam2dudex that would be great but you would have to arrest clinton bush snr obama regan carter etc every american president for the last 100 years at least is guilty of terrorism so prosecuting bush while great doesn't get rid of the problem.. america will support terrorism if it's in there own interest to do so.
johnnyd101 1 year ago
WTF. 10,700 views? are only 10,700 people in america that are smart enough to know what is going on in their own country??????? wtf.
mashcash12 1 year ago
Dick Cheney and George Bush are two murderous monsters! They should have been prosecuted and thrown in jail like the violent criminals that they are.
giggilamour 1 year ago
@giggilamour how many murders have you witnessed in iraq? yu must have been there to witness all of bush's crimes right? or are just another liberal loon shooting off at the mouth from your air conditioned house? do the 29 dems who voted to go hold any responsibility? Is Iraq a better place now?
bmyze316 1 year ago
@bmyze316 PROOF? 100,000+ of murders by the instigation of Evil fuctard Bush and Puppet master Cheney.The Blackwater ethnic cleansing army belongs to Cheney and is funded by Bush!His knowledge of the 911 attack and omitting to warn the people makes HIM the killer.LOuisiana levies wich BUSH REFUSED to properly fix makes HIM the killer of the"Louisianans".The 100,000 INNOCENT iraquis KILLED by Bush to fuel his BLOOD FOR oil war and the 30000+ US soldiers KILLED or BUTCHERED makes HIM the killer...
giggilamour 1 year ago
225,000 Iraqi civilians, I wonder how many of them were killed by their fellow Muslim brethren.
CarringtonVilla 1 year ago
Hey BIDEN,CLINTON,KERRY,AND REID WHY DID YOU VOTE TO SEND OUR TROOPS TO IRAQ???
Congressional votes for Iraq 296-133!!
Senatorial votes to go to Iraq 77-23!!
Stop Blaming Bush!!!!
bmyze316 1 year ago
Because Bush lied to them, duh. Most of the time Congress believes the President of the United States, especially after we get attacked.
d00derman 1 year ago
Congress has the duty to know what they are voting on. They have the same evidence/information the president has. thats a cop out and a pathetic excuse to say they just believed the president. The point i was trying to make was that back then almost EVERYBODY in the world thought iraq has wmd's. that seems crazy to think now but it's true. even 29 democrats believed that. because of the same intel that bush was following.
bmyze316 1 year ago
They don't have the same information as the president. Otherwise why are presidential candidates given special intelligence information when they run? Complete bull right there.
Furthermore, UN inspectors were told to get out by Bush and Bush only. So it is all on him. He could've waited to get all the information, but he was itchy to start the bombing. So it is about time you republicans are accountable for your actions.
d00derman 1 year ago
@d00derman The invasion of Iraq was arguably the most justified case of military action the U.S. has ever taken. Because it's VERY COMPLEX, the TRUTH has been sabotaged, but not by the Bush Administration or America's allies! Read what Resolution 1441 stated, then chek my link on what the UN felt on 3/7/2003
ResearchForTruth75 1 year ago
@ResearchForTruth75 What the UN Felt? There were no triggers in the UN Resolution to go to war.
d00derman 1 year ago
@d00derman UNSCR 678 - November 29, 1990
•Iraq must comply fully with UNSCR 660 (regarding Iraq's illegal invasion of Kuwait) "and all subsequent relevant resolutions."
•Authorizes UN Member States "To Use All Necessary Means to Uphold and Implement resolution 660 and all subsequent relevant resolutions and to restore international peace and security in the area."
ResearchForTruth75 1 year ago
@ResearchForTruth75
are you a conservative?
bmyze316 1 year ago
@bmyze316 More of a realist when it comes to foreign policy. I definately lean more on the conservative side. That's one of the areas I was somewhat disappointed about with the Bush Administration. But his presidency was filled with alot of tough decisions.
ResearchForTruth75 1 year ago
@bmyze316 The spending is what I was a little concerned with, not the foreign policy.
ResearchForTruth75 1 year ago
@ResearchForTruth75 That's not 1441
d00derman 1 year ago
@d00derman UNSCR 687 - April 3, 1991
•Iraq must "unconditionally accept" the destruction, removal or rendering harmless "under international supervision" of all "chemical and biological weapons and all stocks of agents and all related subsystems and components and all research, development, support and manufacturing facilities."
ResearchForTruth75 1 year ago
@ResearchForTruth75 That's not 1441
d00derman 1 year ago
@d00derman ( Resolution 1441) # 13. Recalls, in that context, that the Council has repeatedly warned Iraq that it will face "serious consequences" as a result of its continued violations of its obligations; Better go back and read the U.N. Resolutions!
ResearchForTruth75 1 year ago
@ResearchForTruth75 "serious consequences"? That's it? That doesn't mean war or even a trigger for war, that can mean any kind of consequence. Anything from embargoes, blockades, or any other political diplomatic punishment. BTW, there is no 'war' in the resolution, maybe you should read it.
d00derman 1 year ago
There were sanctions against his country, ever hear of the oil for food program? It turned out to be a big UN scandal. EVERYONE at the UN knew "serious consequences" meant military action! Did you read ANY of the links, or do I have to read them for you? Don't be lusk!
ResearchForTruth75 1 year ago
@ResearchForTruth75 EVERYONE at the U.N. knew? EVERY SINGLE PERSON?
"[T]his resolution contains no "hidden triggers" and no "automaticity" with respect to the use of force." John Negroponte, U.S. Ambassador.
"We heard loud and clear during the negotiations the concerns about "automaticity" and "hidden triggers" -- the concern that on a decision so crucial we should not rush into military action;" - U.K. Ambassador
Need to keep researching.
d00derman 1 year ago
@d00derman 1. Decides that Iraq has been and remains in material breach of its obligations under relevant resolutions, including resolution 687 (1991), in particular through Iraqs failure to cooperate with United Nations inspectors and the IAEA, and to complete the actions required under paragraphs 8 to 13 of resolution 687 (1991);
ResearchForTruth75 1 year ago
@d00derman
2. Decides, while acknowledging paragraph 1 above, to afford Iraq, by this
resolution, a final opportunity to comply with its disarmament obligations under
relevant resolutions of the Council; and accordingly decides to set up an enhanced inspection regime with the aim of bringing to full and verified completion the disarmament process established by resolution 687 (1991) and subsequent resolutions of the Council;
ResearchForTruth75 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@d00derman
2. Decides, while acknowledging paragraph 1 above, to afford Iraq, by this
resolution, a final opportunity to comply with its disarmament obligations under
relevant resolutions of the Council; and accordingly decides to set up an enhanced inspection regime with the aim of bringing to full and verified completion the disarmament process established by resolution 687 (1991) and subsequent resolutions of the Council;
ResearchForTruth75 1 year ago
@d00derman 9. Requests the Secretary-General immediately to notify Iraq of this
resolution, which is binding on Iraq; demands that Iraq confirm within seven days of that notification its intention to comply fully with this resolution; and demands5 S/RES/1441 (2002)
further that Iraq cooperate immediately, unconditionally, and actively with
UNMOVIC and the IAEA;
ResearchForTruth75 1 year ago
@d00derman 13. Recalls, in that context, that the Council has repeatedly warned Iraq that it will face serious consequences as a result of its continued violations of its obligations;
Don't be a fool, they knew what "serious consequences" meant. This is a pathetic attempt by yourself!
ResearchForTruth75 1 year ago
@ResearchForTruth75 Oh no: "Syria voted in favour of the resolution, having received reassurances from its sponsors, the United States of America and the United Kingdom, and from France and Russia through high-level contacts, that it would not be used as a pretext for striking against Iraq and does not constitute a basis for any automatic strikes against Iraq."
d00derman 1 year ago
@ResearchForTruth75 Plus, the UN didn't enter the conflict, neither did the Permanent and Temporary Security Council members except for the UK and US. If they knew they had to support military action, like you claim, why weren't they in the coalition?
d00derman 1 year ago
@d00derman They didn't enter because one no vote nullifies everything, and we know Russia, Germany, and France, all of whom made major kickbacks from Saddam being in power, were asking for more time for inspectors. Was this an attempt to move material out of Iraq? Maybe. Public Law 107 243 It's the law of your country. Take notice what it says. Sorry pal, but any way u look at it, you're wrong.
ResearchForTruth75 1 year ago
@ResearchForTruth75 That is the biggest non-sequitur I have seen yet. First off, Germany wasn't on the Security Council during the vote. Next, if Russia and France did receive kickbacks like you said, why did they vote yes? Another point, it's the most damning evidence yet, Syria on the Temporary Security Council voted yes, and an Arab nation would never vote yes on this resolution if it entailed military action on another Arab nation.
So that's some funny twisting and turning there.
d00derman 1 year ago
@d00derman You are so thick! You are the one twisting words. Resolution 1441 was passed unanimously by the 15 members of the security council. It declared Iraq to be in "material breach" of the 16 previous UN Resolutions that had sought to enforce the truce which ended the Gulf War. The SC ruled Iraq had broken the terms of the truce and was in violation of international law.
ResearchForTruth75 1 year ago
@d00derman UN SC Resolution 1441 was also an ultimatum designed to end Iraq's 11 year breaches of agreements by holding out the threat of force. It offered "a final opportunity" to comply or face "serious consequences." Even a staunch opponent of military action as UN chief Hans Blix recognized this ultimatum as "diplomatic language for possible armed action." They also knew because Bush and Blair talked about it often, don't play dumb!
ResearchForTruth75 1 year ago
Comment removed
ResearchForTruth75 1 year ago
@d00derman The resolution gave Saddam a 30 day deadline to comply. When the deadline passed Blix stated " Iraq appears not to have come to a genuine acceptance, not even today, of the disarmament which was demanded of it and which it needs to carry out to win the confidence of the world and to live in peace."
ResearchForTruth75 1 year ago
@d00derman It must also be noted a last minute measure submitted by the US, after Resolution 1441, and less than two weeks before the onset of war. It was submitted at the request of Tony Blair, who was under enormous pressure from the anti-war left. The effort was withdrawn when French foreign minister, Dominique de Villepin told Colin Powell that although France had voted for the original ultimatum, it would now veto any use of force "under any circumstances,"
ResearchForTruth75 1 year ago
@d00derman It was totally evident that Russia and China too, both of which were arms suppliers to Saddam and allies that helped him circumvent the UN sanctions would provide vetoes as well. I've just owned you with FACTS of what happened. If you can't understand the reality of that, sorry. At the present time you may be on the popular side of what the public thinks, BUT you are on the WRONG side of the true history as to what happened!
ResearchForTruth75 1 year ago
Comment removed
ResearchForTruth75 1 year ago
@d00derman It was totally evident that Russia and China too, both of which were arms suppliers to Saddam and allies that helped him circumvent the UN sanctions would provide vetoes as well. I've just owned you with FACTS of what happened. If you can't understand the reality of that, sorry. At the present time you may be on the popular side of what the public thinks, BUT you are on the WRONG side of the true history as to what happened!
ResearchForTruth75 1 year ago
We now know, however, that giving Blix a few more months would not have made a difference. Last month Kay was asked what would have happened if Blix and his team had been allowed to continue their mission. "All I can say is that among an extensive body of Iraqi scientists who are talking to us, they have said: The U.N. interviewed us; we did not tell them the truth, we did not show them this equipment, we did not talk about these programs; we couldn't do it as long as Saddam was in power.
ResearchForTruth75 1 year ago
Comment removed
d00derman 1 year ago
Comment removed
d00derman 1 year ago
@d00derman 4. Decides that false statements or omissions in the declarations submitted
by Iraq pursuant to this resolution and failure by Iraq at any time to comply with,
and cooperate fully in the implementation of, this resolution shall constitute a
further material breach of Iraqs obligations and will be reported to the Council.
ResearchForTruth75 1 year ago
@ResearchForTruth75 Oh no, reported to the council. Well, that means war.
d00derman 1 year ago
Well im not sure if you are a conservative or not but too many conservatives today look to the founders for everything except foreign policy and that is hypocritical. ww1, korea, vietnam, and iraq were all mistakes. we should stay out of other peoples business.
the fact of the matter is we are in 130 countries today. its expensive and it creates more enemies, not to mention it leaves those forces vulnerable and spreads us out. bring everyone home and militarize space
bmyze316 1 year ago
@bmyze316 Almost everybody in the world thought there were WMDs in Iraq? Thats a lie. some intell. agencies said there were WMDs in Iraq but there were many agencies who said there weren't any.
Braves0056 1 year ago
@Braves0056 the agencies that America trusts thought there was. my only point is that Bush wasn't the only person in america that thought Iraq had wmd's. 29 different democrats voted to go to Iraq but everyone acts like Bush went to Iraq against the will of the people. Iraq had MUCH MORE Bi-Partisan support than Obama's healthcare bill but liberals don't think he did that against the will of the people but Bush who had 29 dem votes did? That doesn't make sense, there is an EXTREME dbl standard
bmyze316 1 year ago
congress is completely separate from the executive branch. Congress wouldn't be doing it's job if they just listened to the president. he is not a king. Bush is at fault, BUT so is congress and the senate.
and if healthcare costs a dollar more than they said ONLY the dems will be to blame. if any rationing of care occurs ONLY dems are to blame.
see the difference
bmyze316 1 year ago
Sure, that's why when Bush said that Iraq would only cost $50 billion instead of $740 billion, he and the republicans are to blame.
d00derman 1 year ago
so if healthcare cost more than the dems said they are to blame then right?
Lets wait and see...
bmyze316 1 year ago
740 bill. thats still not as much as healthcare!! lol
New england journal of medicine reports that 46% of doctors will leave the profession if healthcare passes.
So we will add 30 millions new patients and take away 46% of the doctors...hmm lets think about this can you say Rationing of care?? imagine the lines at the doctors office!!
waiting 6 months for an x-ray (yeah that happens in europe)
bmyze316 1 year ago
Over 10 years. Iraq hasn't been 10 years yet., and hopefully it won't. 50 billion....damn, Bush was a lying buffoon.
d00derman 1 year ago
name one bill that cost as much as the government said it would? its not just bush thats where your missing the point. you just want to hate bush.
Bush was a progressive he spent too much...got it. but what does that say about obama?
you liberal loons love to talk about bush, and Iraq. 77 senators voted to go to iraq, 29 dems, they deserve some of the blame as well, RIGHT? if you cant admit that your completely un-reasonable.
lets talk about now, bush is gone.
bmyze316 1 year ago
@bmyze316 Hahaha. Bush was a progressive because he spent too much. Keep lying to yourself. Reagan had the largest debt since WWII, and taxed the most since WWII. Bush had the largest increase in govt with bailouts, the Iraq War and tax cuts . At least Reagan taxed. Bush put it all on credit. Fiscal Conservative my ass.
d00derman 1 year ago
although with obamas spending, sending troops to combat, renewing the patriot act, drone attacks, lies, re-signing military tribunals it feels like Bush never left HUH?
LOL wake up dude, obama is just another dirty politician who mis-represented himself during the campaign so he could fly around on air force one.
stop drinking the kool-aid and start to educate yourself on history and what is going on today.
We won't get fooled again
bmyze316 1 year ago
So Obama "mis-represented himself" and Bush flat out lied about WMDs in Iraq, connections to Al Qaeda, and destroyed the economy with tax cuts that didn't work, and you want to talk about kool aid?
You've been lapping up the Rush/Drudge/Hannity instructions to parrots like you since who knows when.
d00derman 1 year ago
obama said if a president passed healthcare with a 50+1 majority he couldn't govern. now healthcare is being passed in the senate by 51 votes. explain that.
CSPAN-explain that?
he was going to change things in washington and be bi-partisan. but whenever the dems get questioned they say "thats how it's always been done"
YES he mis-represented himself. he was supposed to be DIFFERENT but by his own admission he does things the Same way as every one else wheres the change????
goes both ways
bmyze316 1 year ago
@bmyze316 The vote was 56-43 genius.
d00derman 1 year ago
@d00derman
you need a 60 vote majority so the so 56 is still reconciliation. its them same thing you clown.
and i never said bush was a fiscal conservative. i agree with the bush critics, but that doesnt give obama a free pass does it? bush was wrong to go to iraq. i dont think we should go to war unless we are attacked. period. just like the founders inteded. so please stop talking about bush like i am a fan.
bmyze316 1 year ago
That first sentence made no sense.
Stop defending Bush like you're a fan and maybe people won't get the wrong impression.
BTW, Reagan and Bush Sr. raised taxes and increased the deficit. Clinton lowered the deficit and the debt. Bush Jr. came in and re-increased the deficit again, and by a large numbers. So there is no such thing as a fiscal conservative. Like the easter bunny or santa claus.
d00derman 1 year ago
29 democrats voted to go to iraq how come no one talks baout their lies in this?
bmyze316 1 year ago
Wahhh ! It's the Liberals ! Wahhhh! lol
HAZEVAULT 2 years ago
You guys still defending the last 8 yrs ? While bitching about the new guy pushing Bush policy ? lol
HAZEVAULT 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I can't count how many lies Cenk has made on his youtube posts. He is a very missinformed liberal.
Balzy73 2 years ago
Yeah, you are right, you can't, mainly because he isn't a compulsive liar.
vortigaunt911 2 years ago 2
Give 3
dude1a2z 2 years ago
LOL!
NeedsEvidence 2 years ago
We are not there to help the people of Iraq. We are there for the profit of global banks. War is big money.
Balzy73 2 years ago 26
@Balzy73 Don't forget the oil companies & defense contractors.
Kougeki1000 1 year ago
@Balzy73 WE HAVE A WINNER! :D
cveich 1 year ago
And Barry's(Aka-Barack) has lied how many times to keep us in Iraq. With no plans of taking us out. The global banks who put this puppet(Barry) in office are making too much money off this war to let him pull us out of Iraq. Open your eyes. He's breaking the law(article 1 section 9) by seating himself at the head of the U.N. Security Council(first Pres. to chair the World Body).
Balzy73 2 years ago 2
ANGRY REPUBLICAN IS ANGRY!
vortigaunt911 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this is the stupidest crap ever. SO BIASED. at least be a little impartial. I mean sure, you could say Bush lied. But how do we know that there were no WMD originally. The news of Bush's intentions on going into Iraq (which had started about 4 months before we did) was known around the world. How hard would it be for Sadam to have seen that his WMD's were discovered and move them within 4 months. NOT HARD AT ALL.
"when bush lies people die" AS IF HE KNEW PEOPLE WERE GOING TO DIE
him904 2 years ago
You fucking idiot...
eatfurrypeople 2 years ago
iraq is a far better place now? what the hell are you talking about? the unemployment is 80 percent, most areas dont have consistant water or electricity, when a foreign country attacks you, everything goes to hell. these countries had problems before we attacked, but now they've been devestated. we're just there to destroy them and grab the oil. america was a great country but now the corporations control our policies including the plans to attack and fuck up iran.
zrac09 2 years ago 17
Please explain how 8 years later we still haven't taken any oil. How countries like China and Russia are getting the oil. Oooooh, you were wrong, I get it.
BriansVideoHobby 2 years ago
@BriansVideoHobby
You know your lying when you say that.
paladinee 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The young turds get it wrong again. Bushes quote was dead on, he never said that Iraq was connected to WTC2. Iraq is a far far better place now with the hope of a great future. Liberals just hate that.
BriansVideoHobby 2 years ago
Ya that's why 10% of the population fled the country since we invaded. They must hate freedom.
spiderwebb33 2 years ago
Yes they do because they were the ones benefiting from the Iraqi enslavement.
BriansVideoHobby 2 years ago
Look at you haters at health care rallies? You act like you are going to take out the world, you bunch of misinformed morons!
Painting swastikas on signs and hanging dummies and painting pictures of Obama as Hitler! You people are wackjobs and will be dealt with!
padude64 2 years ago
I am going to make a video that will piss the repubs off!
padude64 2 years ago
You hate Bush because he led your sons and daughters into a wrong war which was Iraq!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The Bush/Cheney administration needs investigated and the republicans are asking Obama for a birth certificate!
To the republicans, i say screw you!
padude64 2 years ago 3
redumlicans are liars & scam artists don't listen to shit republicans tell you they lie to get their way, they lie to get elected & reelected & after the election sometimes they even admit they lie as a "fuck you" to everyone.like hahaha we lie & you still vote for us FUCK OFF REPUBLICANS we've had enough. repubs had the congress for 12+ years, pres for 8 and supreme court since the 80s and have only accomplished fucking the world up.. time to let another party have the wheel for a decade or so
corysmolly 2 years ago
Bush spent 2.4 trillion in Iraq and the republirats are bitching about Obama health care plan! Give me a break already!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
padude64 2 years ago
Congressional Research Service says $600bn over 6yrs. Not $2.4trillion.
Blackrain4xmas 2 years ago
Iraq should send their troops to USA to fight gangs, the taliban of the USA.
FloJSimpson 2 years ago
Your mama is so fat, when she steps on a scale, it says, to be continued.
FloJSimpson 2 years ago
Um.. but we won?! The GOP says we already won the war in Iraq. Really? Against a 3rd world nation, the Bush Administration playing with our once proud military like they were toy soldiers are STILL FIGHTING a war in Iraq, after HOW MANY YEARS? They can't even do what daddy Bush said not to do!? Amazing incompetence. Amazing lack of skill. A bumbling bunch of idiots destroying this nations fighting stock, along with our economy. These brainless hacks should be summarily executed for treason!
medartist01 2 years ago
General comment to you minority-Republicans out there. Your ulcers may be getting worse as you listen, see, and swallow the mountain of evidence confirming that your President (Bush) lied through his teeth to shove this nation into war with Iraq. The facts speak clearly and eloquently. The credibility of every Republican is known. And its ZERO. The only avenue these shameless dolts have left is to attempt, however pathetic, to rewrite recent history. It won't work. We know what happened. Period.
medartist01 2 years ago
You might presume that the Iraqi's live under more freedom now, but do they have the freedom to demand that US soldiers leave Iraq? No, the army of occupation will not leave until there is no more oil to pump out.
kokoaka 2 years ago
100 years from now, GWB will be popular with white trash and hillbillies and other fanatics
exbronco1980 2 years ago
Or he willed be recognized as genius if the democracy remains stable in Iraq.
KoRnphreak88 2 years ago
So you really believe that they did not lie about the reason for going to war in Iraq? What do you believe were the reasons for going to war? Spreading democracy? That only came about after they could NOT find any WMD's. Democracy will collapse as soon as we leave.
kokoaka 2 years ago
WILL collapse? Wild prediction.
He will go down in history as one the best presidents if the democracy remains stable, similar to Lincoln cause of the liberation of the slaves. Honestly i don't know if the word democracy was put forth after they failed to find the WMD's but one thing is certain: Bush always had the freedom (or the lack of it) of the Iraqis on his mind from day 1. But no, who cares if the Iraqis live under a oppressive government?
KoRnphreak88 2 years ago
Who cares if they're put in a meat grinder with their feet first?
It does not make any real sense that a president with sky high ratings would deliberately lie about something like that, deliberately making himself look bad. I don't know anyone like that. Do you?
People don't put the casualties of the war into perspective. How many people do you think Saddam has killed? Most probably more casualties have been caused by him than in the war.
KoRnphreak88 2 years ago
I don't know if you have been following the news, but Bush and Cheney are now repeatedly DENYING any connection btwn Saddam and al Qeda. So are you still deluding yourself as to the reasons for going to war?
kokoaka 2 years ago
Yes I heard Cheney denied it the other day. Doesn't mean there never was a connection because there was. Sheeples like to believe otherwise because the mainstream media never reported them.
Google: Interview Exploring Probable Links Between 9/11 and Saddam Hussein
KoRnphreak88 2 years ago
So even when Cheney denies there was a connection, you deny his admission and and say "there might still be one." Wow, talk about not letting facts get in the way of your conclusions.
kokoaka 2 years ago
So I take it that you just went ahead and blindly accepted what he and said without looking into other possible sources?
KoRnphreak88 2 years ago
i feel sorry for you you are just a victim of u.s. propaganda
2tzu 2 years ago
And how many people will killed under the current democracy? The answer should be obvious.
Hundred thousands of deaths are a small price to pay for the liberty of millions.
KoRnphreak88 2 years ago
We fought WWII to prove that Germany could not invade another country and impose their system of govt on another country. Are you aware that the US does NOT have the right to go into another country and change their government? If you think that the we had to right to remove Saddam because he was an oppressive dictator, why aren't we invading Somalia or other countries in Africa that are run by dictators or warlords?
kokoaka 2 years ago 2
Wow are you seriously confusing the purposes of Bush's and Hitler's invasions? Two completely different things.
And of course it's impossible to liberate every oppressed nation of the world. Did someone tell you otherwise?
KoRnphreak88 2 years ago