you made things much clearer for me on this, all though I did have to watch the video about 10 times,( rewinding numerous more) because I was trying to figure out numbers....and it doesn't help that you're very beautiful. I'm still having trouble figuring out the sig. diff. when 'mu' and "std. dev." is not known..
@Sam10947 I loved studying Markov processes. Brownian motion, as I am sure you are aware of, is just a strong Markov process. Now the interesting thing is that you are apparently using the Brownian motion to describe something. So, are you using the nonirreduceable stochasitc optimal control to model behavior in nature, machines, or in finances? This is a very interesting little project. I would love to see what problems you are specifically talking about if you can handle a CHICK showing you up
A chick would show me up if she comes up with Lemme or theorems or some sort of algorithm to solve exponentially complex divergent problems, or solve the next challenges, like the control of a fusion plasma profile. so what is ur point ? am i sensing the fact that u r trying to portray ur offense or is it the fact that u didn't construe and distinguish a sensical observation from sarcasm
@IbanezV70CE The significance level is our rejection region. It is the maximum area that we require to reject the null. The P-value is the area of our data (the test statistic). It is our evidence against the null. If the P-value is inside the rejection region, we have the evidence to reject. If any of the area of the P-value is outside the rejection region, we don't have enough evidence.
I'm sorry, in finding the Z-value of the critical value 2.05 (by going down to 2.0 and over to 0.05) I get 0.4798. Only after subtracting this number (0.4798) from .5 do I get 0.0202, and that should be made much clearer than is explained in this video (position 3:13). From the Z-Table, 0.0202 can not be found at 2 + .05, but rather from subtracting the actual number found (0.4798) from the half. Isn't that so? Thanks for the otherwise great lessons. Please don't miss important steps.
@BTRUIIU It actually depends on the z-table you are looking at. Most z-tables give you the area to the entire left of a certain z-value. When I am referring to the z-table I am referring to the one that is found through Weiss' Elementary Statistics. So, I didn't miss any steps, you just weren't looking at the correct formatted table.
I thought beauty and brains were not correlated. I have been proved wrong by you. I would attend all your classes and fail on purpose just to attend them again. You are very attractive.
I would like to tell you that your explanation helped a lot. But , in thus case, what about if the confidence interval is not given? What's the P-Value?
Thanks for the video. I have an exam in 2 weeks and this really helped me understand the material. Could you please do another tutorial on hypothesis testing using a proportion instead of mew?
Really love ur efforts, But one question.....Why you always uses that complicated numbers to demostrate ... almost EVERY SINGLE TIME. Using simple numbers, whole numbers to make what you want to teach us----the concept more outstanding and we will not be distracted by that weird numbers. .... FYI
Thank you so much for this great video! As a college student taking a very difficult statistics course, this is a great supplement to fill in some blanks I missed along the way. Again, thank you very much. So helpful!
@Catheranne You need to look up the value in the z-table. Go down to 2, then go across to .05, which shows you .4798. You then need to subtract it from 0.50 (because each side is 50% of probabilities), so 0.50 - 0.4798 = 0.0202.
I do find all of your videos very useful and you are a great teacher. Thanks a lot for that.
In this particular one I spotted a tiny little mistake with the Za values shown at the two-tails. Normally, they should be 1.96 and not 0.0202 (i.e Za/2 and not Za as in the case of one-tail test)
Hi, thanks for your radio for us first, butI still have a question for it. What's the difference between the Z value that you wirte on the whiteboard and t value in Teststatistic because i mentioned that the formula for caculating is the same, thus,are they the same things? Hope for your answers. thanks so much.
Hi, thanks for your radio for us first, butI still have a question for it. What's the difference between the Z value that you wirte on the whiteboard and t value in Teststatistic because i mentioned that the formula for caculating is the same, thus,are they the same things? Hope for your answers. thanks so much.
Hi, thanks for your radio for us first, butI still have a question for it. What's the difference between the Z value that you wirte on the whiteboard and t value in Teststatistic because i mentioned that the formula for caculating is the same, thus,are they the same things? Hope for your answers. thanks so much.
t-test and z is not calculated together, you use t-test when the sample size is large enough (>30) and also when the population variance is unknown only.
otherwise you could have just used z value instead (I might be wrong through)
A very useful video just one question about your conclusion. Since your alternate hypothesis was that U is not equal to 7.4 wouldnt your conclusding setence be "we are 95% certain that the ... is different from 7.4?
I think you made a mistake when you calculated 0.0202...0.0202 is the total P value, not 0.0404 because the two tails each have 0.0101. Good lecture though, it helped me ALOT for my midterm.
Sorry, this is not working for me. I find those curves and their point of inflection very very distracting. I couldn't listen to five words in a row. Please wear something more conservative so that the words can get to me. Good work.
The video forgot to mention how the p-value was derived in case the statistic is positive. The Z table shows .9798 for positive val 2.05. P-val = 2(1-.9798)=0.0404
@acutegrl yes that was confusing for me and i had to drill into my brain it's 1 - (value from the z table. I thought others will have an issue w/that as well. Good luck :)
you should make more videos explaining Stat concepts and submit them for review. once stamped approve. send them off to the Online universities for distribution, cuz some of us onliners need a show and tell.
It's so reassuring to see how someone who clearly knows the mathematics nonetheless has trouble getting her mouth around the jargon.....I have exactly the same problem.
Hi just thought to thank you. I watched all your lectures. They are wonderful. I understand talking in front of camera with no students present, feels boring. However see more than this lecture has been watch more than six thousand times. A professor would not be able to deliver this many times in his/her entire career. Appreciated for the effort. Hopefully there would be more lectures in future.
@tcreelmuw - actually, the way a presentation such as yours is useful is when you (or any presenter) makes one or two statements in a way that is different from all other explanations that one reads in various books. Such statements helps the student to expand the thinking in a different direction and things then become very clear. That is exactly what happened to me when I watched this video. Thank you.
thank you very much for this vid. I have the most horrible professor who's new this semester and barely speaks or understands english.... nuff' said... THANK YOU!!! :)
you made things much clearer for me on this, all though I did have to watch the video about 10 times,( rewinding numerous more) because I was trying to figure out numbers....and it doesn't help that you're very beautiful. I'm still having trouble figuring out the sig. diff. when 'mu' and "std. dev." is not known..
newbiostat 2 weeks ago
Right after she says "hi", I was thinking bye, get back to the kitchen x DDD
Heavymetalisforlife 1 month ago
since when chicks know statistics..i guess they can stick to the basics. Try non irreduceable stochastic optimal control and brownian motion problems
Sam10947 1 month ago
@Sam10947 I loved studying Markov processes. Brownian motion, as I am sure you are aware of, is just a strong Markov process. Now the interesting thing is that you are apparently using the Brownian motion to describe something. So, are you using the nonirreduceable stochasitc optimal control to model behavior in nature, machines, or in finances? This is a very interesting little project. I would love to see what problems you are specifically talking about if you can handle a CHICK showing you up
tcreelmuw 1 month ago 6
@tcreelmuw
A chick would show me up if she comes up with Lemme or theorems or some sort of algorithm to solve exponentially complex divergent problems, or solve the next challenges, like the control of a fusion plasma profile. so what is ur point ? am i sensing the fact that u r trying to portray ur offense or is it the fact that u didn't construe and distinguish a sensical observation from sarcasm
Sam10947 1 month ago
@tcreelmuw
i'm just grown up man with warrior heart and a kid attitude, hence the joke
Sam10947 1 month ago
I want this video on my T707 phone.
bobdaugherty820 1 month ago
This is a very "hysterical" video. =p
enarolloyd49g 1 month ago
Thanks
WizDone 2 months ago
You are the best. Thank you so much. And you are beautiful too. Have my final today, and u made things easier in less than 5 minutes. WOW!
Saronaist 2 months ago
Incredibly helpful, thank you. Not sure why my prof couldn't articulate this in a two hour lecture, when you managed in seven minutes!
marniemarie1 2 months ago
get them boobies out and flyin
milfhuntah17 2 months ago
:29 cuutiiie
oqendro 2 months ago
Hottttieeeeeeeee
Amarz05 2 months ago
why do we reject the null hypothesis when the p value is less than the level of significance?
could you please give me an english explaination to why its rejected?
IbanezV70CE 2 months ago
@IbanezV70CE The significance level is our rejection region. It is the maximum area that we require to reject the null. The P-value is the area of our data (the test statistic). It is our evidence against the null. If the P-value is inside the rejection region, we have the evidence to reject. If any of the area of the P-value is outside the rejection region, we don't have enough evidence.
tcreelmuw 2 months ago
@tcreelmuw I see. Thanks for clearing that up. And thanks for posting the video.
IbanezV70CE 2 months ago
@tcreelmuw Can I calculate the P value this way for a T-test?
POLAK1Nysa 3 weeks ago
Do smaller alpha's indicate greater degrees of significance?
S4disticJ0k3r 3 months ago
@S4disticJ0k3r Yes it does.
tcreelmuw 3 months ago
thanks for the help lady... you real good.. besbelieeeedat
9006615 3 months ago
Thanks you helped me out :) Appreciate it and I look forward to youtube-ing more of your videos during exams.
nicholden1 3 months ago
This has been very helpful to me...You really know how to simplify stuff. hats off!!!
MwilaKN 4 months ago
Thank you for your help! Ignore the unwanted comments.
TheWingsofJustice 4 months ago
Defffff gonna get on that...Deffffff
maxclark1991 4 months ago
I'm sorry, in finding the Z-value of the critical value 2.05 (by going down to 2.0 and over to 0.05) I get 0.4798. Only after subtracting this number (0.4798) from .5 do I get 0.0202, and that should be made much clearer than is explained in this video (position 3:13). From the Z-Table, 0.0202 can not be found at 2 + .05, but rather from subtracting the actual number found (0.4798) from the half. Isn't that so? Thanks for the otherwise great lessons. Please don't miss important steps.
BTRUIIU 4 months ago
@BTRUIIU It actually depends on the z-table you are looking at. Most z-tables give you the area to the entire left of a certain z-value. When I am referring to the z-table I am referring to the one that is found through Weiss' Elementary Statistics. So, I didn't miss any steps, you just weren't looking at the correct formatted table.
tcreelmuw 4 months ago
By FAR the hottest math teacher I have ever seen.
zogger64 4 months ago 2
why would you divide the sigma by n for finding z?
2010aurnob 4 months ago
@2010aurnob yeah that's completely wrong.
lonilittleboots 4 months ago
MILF
gopaulnarin 5 months ago
I thought beauty and brains were not correlated. I have been proved wrong by you. I would attend all your classes and fail on purpose just to attend them again. You are very attractive.
youpipeify 5 months ago
I had trouble concentrating because you're too beautiful
TheManGuyDude 5 months ago
On step 4, when I looked at the table, 2.05 came up as .4798. How'd you get .0202?
disasterVoiceNZ 6 months ago 2
You seem really nice - thanks for the help, I have a test Friday!!!
Ms4dmin 6 months ago
good job!
Maree131 7 months ago
U r too cute. I cannot concentrate. I guess I will scroll down and watch a bald, old, ugly guy explaining statistics...
Butch1982 7 months ago
There needs to be more women math instuctors to make the subject matter of a higher interest
DAtNizzaYOuKnOw 8 months ago
you're so hot, i couldn't concentrate and i failed the final because of your tits
hohohee1 9 months ago 4
@hohohee1 hahahahahah this is so much typical and can apply to so many people...good you're saying it out loud man!
rac2450 1 month ago in playlist Favorite videos
I would like to tell you that your explanation helped a lot. But , in thus case, what about if the confidence interval is not given? What's the P-Value?
Aklilusas 9 months ago
......wow
raj4221423 9 months ago
best boobs i ever saw.......wow
raj4221423 9 months ago
EVERYONE WATCH 5.13 WOAH!
anndrewzZz 9 months ago
@anndrewzZz Yes! me too! 5:13 is awesome!
Butch1982 7 months ago
oh god, milf.
anndrewzZz 9 months ago
thank you, very helpful
ixsolis 10 months ago
Yes lots of help I appreciate it and you are smokin' hot
BMFWarwick11 10 months ago
thank you.
rafuzibitch 10 months ago
gezz.....really open my mind....thanks 4 d help....
fernandoatan 10 months ago
Thanks for the video. I have an exam in 2 weeks and this really helped me understand the material. Could you please do another tutorial on hypothesis testing using a proportion instead of mew?
Like...
Ho : p = 9.2
H1 : p > 9.2
highonsugar25 10 months ago
Really love ur efforts, But one question.....Why you always uses that complicated numbers to demostrate ... almost EVERY SINGLE TIME. Using simple numbers, whole numbers to make what you want to teach us----the concept more outstanding and we will not be distracted by that weird numbers. .... FYI
bobichina 10 months ago
God I hate stats
ultimateinfinite 10 months ago
You just explained in 7 minutes what took my prof 3 50minute classes to explain, thank you very much!
logimage2 10 months ago
Great tutorial! I've been reading a book on statistics, these videos supersedes my book.
Scubapops 10 months ago
She has two nice normal distributed tities.
jasonmason29 11 months ago 2
Thanks..........
RickyPipez 11 months ago
Thank you so much for this great video! As a college student taking a very difficult statistics course, this is a great supplement to fill in some blanks I missed along the way. Again, thank you very much. So helpful!
MountainSleeper 11 months ago
your boobs are too distracting, im so failing tomorrows test :P
ROLNIKxPL 11 months ago
How did you find .0202...I can't figure that out?
Catheranne 11 months ago
@Catheranne You need to look up the value in the z-table. Go down to 2, then go across to .05, which shows you .4798. You then need to subtract it from 0.50 (because each side is 50% of probabilities), so 0.50 - 0.4798 = 0.0202.
kaizomi 10 months ago 6
Comment removed
ozantiii 11 months ago
This is amazing! Thanks for the help.
uberjuberduber 11 months ago
any vidz on ANOVA. multiple regression. F ratio's , errors etc?
Creolebway 1 year ago
your a stats teacher!? booooooooooooobs :)
Creolebway 1 year ago
how did you get the p-value 0.202???? im lost
spuntaneousent 1 year ago
good looks but what's more important is that you explain this in a coherent manner.
Thank you.
BullGuy87 1 year ago
Love it
Rawshangar 1 year ago
I do find all of your videos very useful and you are a great teacher. Thanks a lot for that.
In this particular one I spotted a tiny little mistake with the Za values shown at the two-tails. Normally, they should be 1.96 and not 0.0202 (i.e Za/2 and not Za as in the case of one-tail test)
GEORGEBELG 1 year ago
Hi, thanks for your radio for us first, butI still have a question for it. What's the difference between the Z value that you wirte on the whiteboard and t value in Teststatistic because i mentioned that the formula for caculating is the same, thus,are they the same things? Hope for your answers. thanks so much.
jiaoyingxi 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hi, thanks for your radio for us first, butI still have a question for it. What's the difference between the Z value that you wirte on the whiteboard and t value in Teststatistic because i mentioned that the formula for caculating is the same, thus,are they the same things? Hope for your answers. thanks so much.
jiaoyingxi 1 year ago
Hi, thanks for your radio for us first, butI still have a question for it. What's the difference between the Z value that you wirte on the whiteboard and t value in Teststatistic because i mentioned that the formula for caculating is the same, thus,are they the same things? Hope for your answers. thanks so much.
jiaoyingxi 1 year ago
@jiaoyingxi
t-test and z is not calculated together, you use t-test when the sample size is large enough (>30) and also when the population variance is unknown only.
otherwise you could have just used z value instead (I might be wrong through)
etismyname 1 year ago
They chose her to do it for her big thingies. I think the explaination helped a lot though
tomyo669 1 year ago
Thank you for this video. It was very helpful.
UHUO 1 year ago
massive tits on ya
niallsp 1 year ago 12
A very useful video just one question about your conclusion. Since your alternate hypothesis was that U is not equal to 7.4 wouldnt your conclusding setence be "we are 95% certain that the ... is different from 7.4?
aTerranWraith 1 year ago
@aTerranWraith The significance level is 1 - the confidence level, which gives us (in this case the 95%)
tcreelmuw 1 year ago
You can ask Questions in Statistics or Math to "reviewermath"
reviewermath 8 months ago
Thank you so much! Your lecture actually made things so much clearer!
pulchritudeness 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Latino wives alone and try to chat her rockmycity.info
danyellhirdlgo 1 year ago
thank you very much for this
LordGaara1983 1 year ago
any chance you can make a videos on upper and lower tail using proportions?
2415Jan 1 year ago
excellent video..thanks for posting!
sky6533 1 year ago
my stupid professor made this so much more difficult! I've been trying to get this for hours and you explained it 5 min. Thank you!!
TheShoalinstyle 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hi brother needs to chat a, Asian women busizz4me.info
RouksAdtas 1 year ago
excellent lecture...this very much helped me and the material was presented very clearly, thanks again!
ixelerate 1 year ago
I think you made a mistake when you calculated 0.0202...0.0202 is the total P value, not 0.0404 because the two tails each have 0.0101. Good lecture though, it helped me ALOT for my midterm.
kalahello 1 year ago
Very helpful! Thank you!
acutegrl 1 year ago
Great job! Simple, objective and clear. Thank you
goodguy74 1 year ago
Sorry, this is not working for me. I find those curves and their point of inflection very very distracting. I couldn't listen to five words in a row. Please wear something more conservative so that the words can get to me. Good work.
TubeCactus 1 year ago
EXCELLENT !
altamashansar 1 year ago
The video forgot to mention how the p-value was derived in case the statistic is positive. The Z table shows .9798 for positive val 2.05. P-val = 2(1-.9798)=0.0404
djaia 1 year ago
Comment removed
djaia 1 year ago
@djaia Thanks for explaining this part. This was the part that I was missing and kept getting lost on :)
acutegrl 1 year ago
@acutegrl yes that was confusing for me and i had to drill into my brain it's 1 - (value from the z table. I thought others will have an issue w/that as well. Good luck :)
djaia 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@djaia Thanks for explaining this part. This was the part that I was missing and kept getting lost on :)
acutegrl 1 year ago
great video. very helpful.
mlmiles1 1 year ago
use a teleprompter
iud101 1 year ago
arent you suppose to divide the alpha by 2 because its a two tailed test? need help thanks
humza101 1 year ago
wow, thank u soooo much !!! GREAT JOB!!!
MegaSpeedyGonzalez 1 year ago
thanks! now it actually makes sense :D
TrueShadowJS 1 year ago
you got nice tits
Chattice 1 year ago 37
im just going through all your videos and taking notes on each test to cram for aps. thank god i found your channel, it is such help
MsChoEnglish 1 year ago
Thank u, it is so helpful god bless u
karmooooooosh 1 year ago
Thanks for this video tutorial! It was definitely helpful to me!
rachelwong111 1 year ago
Thank you :)
mistryman112 1 year ago
Comment removed
oshahzad1988 1 year ago
Thanks very much. As already comment, you are very beautiful!.
vinatox 1 year ago
you should make more videos explaining Stat concepts and submit them for review. once stamped approve. send them off to the Online universities for distribution, cuz some of us onliners need a show and tell.
systemaddictshock 1 year ago
you are hot
awake me from my drowsiness of ap stats....
crazy40906 2 years ago
You are so beautiful, I watched the video more than once. I wish you were my teacher. Nice breasts!
2121555 2 years ago 47
@2121555 terrible.
MasterFreespirit 9 months ago
is the number of samples are effective to reject or accept the null hypothesis?
sanger786 2 years ago
It's so reassuring to see how someone who clearly knows the mathematics nonetheless has trouble getting her mouth around the jargon.....I have exactly the same problem.
wlwak 2 years ago
I felt somewhat like an idiot talking to the camera with no students to listen to me. :)
Plus, my mind always seems to go ahead of my mouth. A hazard of the profession.
tcreelmuw 2 years ago
@tcreelmuw you are quite pretty no worries now uve got loads of students :D
EvansdiAl 9 months ago
Nice accent. A real southern belle. My my what a treat.
wlwak 2 years ago
u r cute.
Keep going!
Interesting subject
spand3244 2 years ago
thanks a lot, I hope to see more of your videos
jaci1011 2 years ago
How did you obtain .0202 ?
fej3a 2 years ago
ah you make stats a little more bearable :)
iloveseattle123 2 years ago
excellent, well done!!!!
mercywater 2 years ago
great video. You are a great teacher.
bartstanz 2 years ago
thank god there are cute ladies with brains like you. MAKE this into video lectures for small subsciptions. I will buy to be in you class on the net
gkodii 2 years ago 8
I didn't think I was being that helpful. But, thanks.
tcreelmuw 2 years ago
Hi just thought to thank you. I watched all your lectures. They are wonderful. I understand talking in front of camera with no students present, feels boring. However see more than this lecture has been watch more than six thousand times. A professor would not be able to deliver this many times in his/her entire career. Appreciated for the effort. Hopefully there would be more lectures in future.
jamesscottemail 2 years ago
@tcreelmuw - actually, the way a presentation such as yours is useful is when you (or any presenter) makes one or two statements in a way that is different from all other explanations that one reads in various books. Such statements helps the student to expand the thinking in a different direction and things then become very clear. That is exactly what happened to me when I watched this video. Thank you.
RSKALAGNANAM 1 year ago
thanks so much. :). This is way better than reading those long, complicated instructions lol.
EcraM33 2 years ago
thank you very much for this vid. I have the most horrible professor who's new this semester and barely speaks or understands english.... nuff' said... THANK YOU!!! :)
butlerdawgs78 2 years ago 2
thanks for the refresher. i second the comment earlier that you're cute too. i'd turn up to all your classes.
tommygunn8888 2 years ago
thank god for people like you!
tguevara06 2 years ago
i sit through a class thats an hour and 15 mins long and im lost. i watch this for 6:55 and i understand completely. THANK YOU!!
AUtiger07 2 years ago 2
I just wanted to say thanks for this video. My teacher's not the greatest at explaining but I completely understand it now!
tloef 2 years ago
Thank you... You are a terrific teacher. I think you just helped me pass my midterm :)
tweakedmofo 2 years ago
helpful vid, but quite distracting because you are cute
maxwellthedog 2 years ago
It's so helpful, It's breifly explained thank you for posting!!! A
bhlkassahun 2 years ago 3