To be honest, if you look at the story from a certain lens it could be considered centuries old. Classic French stories, such as Beauty and the Beast, as well as Goethe's Faust, were almost certainly influences for the story.
Don't want to see the characters and their story butchered for future generations?
Then be appalled to know that in Lloyd Webber's unwelcome sequel, entitled LOVE NEVER DIES, which is based on a flop novella by Frederick Forsyth, the Phantom no longer composes opera but trashy vaudeville while not being a bartender, Christine sleeps around, Meg becomes a topless dancer who murders Christine and Raoul becomes an alcoholic and wife abuser.
I hate being compelled to bust balls, but Deepdesert hits the nail on the head. I am a self-proclaimed Phantom History Guru, and I am shocked that the narrator of this documentary says the whole "entertaining for centuries" bit. However, it is not the narrator's fault. What the fuck? If you are going to film a documentary, RESEARCH THE DATES FIRST OR DON'T FILM IT AT ALL! I mean, if a thing's worth doing, it's worth doing right.
Question I have is the way this documentary presents it, or maybe it really was like that, but is't it alot easier to use or acknowledge the template set by the Original in London? As well as sending over a few cast members such as the dancers, fx, behind the scenes, to help.
As well, send key members for a show in London that way they can see what it's supposed to be about vs having to reinvent the wheel.
FYI, this isn't the original version of the Behind the Mask documentary. The first version was aired right before the show opened in September of 1989, before the Phantom music video was made. That version showed more clips of the restoration of the theatre, where the video would have been. I have both versions on VHS.
Is it just me or is EVERY TIME an international production of a "big" RUG show is staged, they always make a big deal about restoring the theatre that hosts the show?!
well it depends on what production you are talking about. If it's the musical "Phamtom" then the restoration of the theatre it's in IS gonna be a big deal, in a sense. . . only because the theatre itself is part of the production, they want you to feel as though you are in that Opera house in Paris (in some places, that is). Others might need the accomodations and repairs or reworks just so they can house the tech work and equipment that goes into the production. IDK I hope this might help you.
I recall seeing this on the CBC when it first aired in 89/90. I would say our friends at Mirvish picked up the pieces of the Livent implosion pretty well.
I call it the 'Canon-Pantages' lol---the architecture and restoration is absolutely beautiful so the name pantages suits it much nicer, I think of a circus when I hear the name "canon" :P
I once asked a Mirvish representative why the name was changed and was told they didn't want to keep the name of a man who was a convicted child molester (Alexander Pantages).
Thank you for posting this. I used to have this on a VHS (taped from TV as well) and lost it over the years.
Budderfly1978 3 months ago
This production debuted 22 years ago this very night ... :o)
dotmacis 5 months ago in playlist The Phantom of the Opera
Yeah, but maybe the actual STORY of the Phantom had existed for centuries. The actual Parisian Opera House IS centuries old.
IMbirdieful 10 months ago
To be honest, if you look at the story from a certain lens it could be considered centuries old. Classic French stories, such as Beauty and the Beast, as well as Goethe's Faust, were almost certainly influences for the story.
jazzandmint 1 year ago
Fan of PHANTOM?
Don't want to see the characters and their story butchered for future generations?
Then be appalled to know that in Lloyd Webber's unwelcome sequel, entitled LOVE NEVER DIES, which is based on a flop novella by Frederick Forsyth, the Phantom no longer composes opera but trashy vaudeville while not being a bartender, Christine sleeps around, Meg becomes a topless dancer who murders Christine and Raoul becomes an alcoholic and wife abuser.
Find out more @ LoveShouldDie [dot] Com
LoveShouldDie 1 year ago
I hate being compelled to bust balls, but Deepdesert hits the nail on the head. I am a self-proclaimed Phantom History Guru, and I am shocked that the narrator of this documentary says the whole "entertaining for centuries" bit. However, it is not the narrator's fault. What the fuck? If you are going to film a documentary, RESEARCH THE DATES FIRST OR DON'T FILM IT AT ALL! I mean, if a thing's worth doing, it's worth doing right.
davidlabelle361 1 year ago
@davidlabelle361
Question I have is the way this documentary presents it, or maybe it really was like that, but is't it alot easier to use or acknowledge the template set by the Original in London? As well as sending over a few cast members such as the dancers, fx, behind the scenes, to help.
As well, send key members for a show in London that way they can see what it's supposed to be about vs having to reinvent the wheel.
at1212b 3 months ago
COLM WILKINSON *FANGIRL SCREAMS*
HE MADE THE BEST JEAN VALJEAN
ImUrFanGirl 1 year ago
3:32
What a shot! :O<3
TheWanderingchild 2 years ago 4
"the story of the phantom has gripped people for centuries"???
It was only written in 1911!
Deepdesert 2 years ago 15
@Deepdesert A century in 1 day! XD
MyArtIsLoved731 1 year ago
I love you Colm-but please, take off the vest xD
Thank you for posting!
DragonHeart06 2 years ago
FYI, this isn't the original version of the Behind the Mask documentary. The first version was aired right before the show opened in September of 1989, before the Phantom music video was made. That version showed more clips of the restoration of the theatre, where the video would have been. I have both versions on VHS.
dotmacis 2 years ago
I edited out the Pantages restoration bits so the clips would not be so long on youtube.
buttertartlover 2 years ago
Is it just me or is EVERY TIME an international production of a "big" RUG show is staged, they always make a big deal about restoring the theatre that hosts the show?!
HouseOnSunset 3 years ago
i guess they just want it to look nice lol
phantomofopera91 2 years ago
well it depends on what production you are talking about. If it's the musical "Phamtom" then the restoration of the theatre it's in IS gonna be a big deal, in a sense. . . only because the theatre itself is part of the production, they want you to feel as though you are in that Opera house in Paris (in some places, that is). Others might need the accomodations and repairs or reworks just so they can house the tech work and equipment that goes into the production. IDK I hope this might help you.
JudaPrising 2 years ago
I recall seeing this on the CBC when it first aired in 89/90. I would say our friends at Mirvish picked up the pieces of the Livent implosion pretty well.
skycron 3 years ago
This show is so beautiful I can't wait to see it again next month.
MichaelCrawfordsFan 3 years ago
For some reason, I'm not sure why, I find it really funny that Colm is wearing a phantom mask vest lol.
kristinalinda 3 years ago
You know what's weird? Colm and Rebecca were in Les Miserables as Valjean and Cosette.
miep8675 3 years ago
Thank you for posting this video. I been looking for this video for a very long time.
TWZ95 4 years ago
yeah lol
paznoth 4 years ago
Just an FYI The Pantages Theatre is now The Canon Theatre.
randomguyme 4 years ago
I call it the 'Canon-Pantages' lol---the architecture and restoration is absolutely beautiful so the name pantages suits it much nicer, I think of a circus when I hear the name "canon" :P
Chrisrex83 4 years ago
I agree, I like The Pantages much more. "Canon" just doesn't sound fancy enough for what that theatre is.
randomguyme 4 years ago
I once asked a Mirvish representative why the name was changed and was told they didn't want to keep the name of a man who was a convicted child molester (Alexander Pantages).
dotmacis 2 years ago
Hah, so true. Pantages has a mystique and grandeur sound that theatre represents.
at1212b 3 years ago