5 minutes with dawkins

[loveisallneed]

test

[doloftlema]

this guy has a limited awareness of the false propaganda of religion, sectism,dogma, political systems ,you have to walk away from every form of label imposed on the mind by the gurus and politicians. You still have to live in society, so you have to understand the jpropaganda of that particular society you live in , to be free of it.Basically there is very littie difference between the so called religious lifeand the fsscist, communist, capitaliast ,racialist--nationalist citezens,

[forzaitalia2]

what richard does is simple. he has not proof, he mearly point out an alternative way of thinking. which is all very well.

[trident3b]

forzaitalia2: not 100% sure what you mean, but I will say this: religious people simply have absolutley no proof at all. And that is chiefly R. Dawkin's point. What he claims and shows can all be proved. Other things that cannot (yet) be proved may be proved when the human is further up the learnig code, but creating stories for the sake of having any old answer is the less convincing arguement. Way back when, people wanted answers, so authors of bibles etc. tried to provide them, with no proof.

[Nemesis000000]

@forzaitalia2 Has no proof of what? If you mean the non-existence of God, then true. On the other hand, you have no proof that we aren't living in The Matrix or that Lord Xenu isn't out there or that invisible aliens do not live on Saturn. Would you call not believing in those things "an alternative way of thinking"?

If you mean no proof of evolution/big bang cosmology then I'm wasting my time. I assume that isn't the case.

[forzaitalia2]

@Nemesis000000 true but we have no proof that we are living in the matric, that lord Xenu is out there and so on, so until there is something then....i dont really see why that could be used as an example to prove weather those things exist or not

[Nemesis000000]

@forzaitalia2 You are right, there is no proof of them. Therefore it's logical to say they do not exist.

Why doesn't that apply to God? Just because there isn't proof that he doesn't exist, doesn't mean he does. Just like the examples I gave.

[pulipuli777]

A crash course in rational thinking!

thanks for posting...cheers!

[evacuationplanb]

Great little interview, criminally underwatched, Sundried. Rated and fav'd.

[kipps2]

Not really "underwatched" - it's been available on the BBC website ever since, every now and then, appearing in the "Most Watched" list. Mind you, not sure if only available in the UK.

Yep, great little interview.