lorsque le prolétariat aura de sa main de fer écrasé la bourgeoisie rapace et capitaliste,on ne jouera plus sur les nerfs du peuple affamé avec l"archet de la démagogie
National socialism is by far the best system that can be achieved however not to the extent and radicalism of that of hitler's. people need to put history aside for Germany was the best place to live in b4 the war started... in 1936 it hosted the olympics! This system does work once u have the right people in power...
@ofer100000 You know that you're talking realt shit here right? Millions of people (alot of germans themselves amongst others) were killed in Nazi Germany. And a lot of these people cause they we're communists. What Hitler did was as far away from socialism as china is today. Fascism is never a good system, never forget that.
The massive amount of deaths attributed with Stalin come from a Cold War-era Historian named Robert Conquest and Khrushchev. Conquest's 20 million deaths claim comes from Khrushchev's secret speech. Modern Historian John Getty has proven that the real number wasn't anywhere near 20 million, rather 1.5 million. Grover Furr's new book "Khrushchev Lied" has also proven that Khrushchev's secret speech wasn't honest.
Face it, the USA uses propaganda just like any other country.
Socialism means equal opportunities for all and meeting basic human needs in health, housing, education and energy. If these things are missing in your life it's because someone else is stealing your rights, in other words the Capitalist system is allowing them to do so.
depuis 1945 le PCF n a pas arrete de pactiser avec la droute pour envoyer dans le mur les revoltes populairesvous voulez un exemple dans une municipalite PCF-CGT on trouve des terrains constructibles a 900 euros mettre a genoux un petit proprietaire pour faire un lycee a la causecsu et sucrer les apparachick au passage
@mrdeathbycheese12 You're right, I actually intended it to say "Socialism is not synonymous..." when I wrote it out, but sadly Youtube doesn't have an edit feature so I just left it as is.
Though, it is important to realize that Lenin himself was forced to reshape Leninism, case in point being the NEP. Truth be told, neither Stalinism, Maoism, nor even Leninism is perfectly concordant with Lenin's aspirations as they are laid out in, say, "State and Revolution."
The French Revolution was the ugliest bloodbath in History so far. Never before had so many human beings be slaughtered in the name of "liberty, equality, fraternity".
Before the French Revolution, people (in many Europeans countries including France, Austria, Spain, Prussia or Russia) were slaves of their Kings. In 1789 French decided to be free.
And the Revolution was a bloodbath because others countries attacked France, they want the death of the Republic because they fear for their own crown.
@Iggy3d If you think the guillotine is ugly(It was made to be painless.), take a look at what the monarchs of Europe were doing right before the revolution. Some monarchs had killed tens of thousands of people during their reigns (Although monarchs rule for life. So, the timespan is more larger.) 18-century execution techniques in Europe were often horrifically cruel. And, the monarchists were also causing terror in France during the revolution. Ever know about the White Terror.....
@DinodudeEpic The monarchy was corrupt and brutal, that is true. However, when you preach the great ideals of "Liberty, Equality and Fraternity" and THEN go on slaughtering hundreds of thousands of your own citizens, let alone the foreign country that you attack and destroy, you are bound to be called a sadistic hypocrite, just like the king and his henchmen that you pretend to replace. As for your remark about the guillotine being painless, I would suggest you try it out and then let me know.
@Iggy3d I was merely saying the Revolution wasn't the ugliest bloodbath in History so far(That title would go to the Mongols.). Also, Robespierre's regime wasn't the entire revolution. There was the Directory, which didn't commit a Reign of Terror.
Also, I never said the guillotine was painless, I said it was MADE to be painless. The purpose of it was to give everyone painless and equal executions. Whether it fulfilled it's purpose is unknown.
@Iggy3d Also, speaking of ugly things. The bourbon kings AND queen had hordes of prostitutes....Either way, I do agree that Robespierre was a douche-bag. But, he wasn't around for the entirety of the revolution (The directory.) and the revolution wasn't the worst bloodbath of it's time. The Spanish inquisition was still in place, and there were lots of WAY more brutal and deadly events before the French Revolution.
I am so ashamed of my country when I listen to this. 90 million human being slaughtered by this sick ideology and still no Nurnberg trial for Communists and henchmen.
@Iggy3d We first need a Nurnberg trial for the neoliberals and their sick ideology that starved to death hundreds of millions around the globe. An inhuman ideology that usually was imposed using traditional dictatorship methods and tortures. An ideology that still is alive while Communism belongs to the past. And a ideology that is promoted by a tiny stratum of mega bankers and money makers that think that human genes or software code are patent-able... Grow up and face real enemies dear...
communism is inherently anti human instinct which is greed and selfishness, the world is not yet ready for the egalitarian socialist utopia where we are not self serving but other serving, the time will come when all in society are valued equally, when we do truly own the means of production and we are valued beyond the elites reach and the capatilist nightmare is once and truly demolished
Communism and socialism could never work, and will never work. It's impossible. The same as national socialism. Hungary lived both of them and thank you, it was enough. Every socialist party should be ignored.
As a general response to the comments: don't lump Stalin and Lenin together as one person, they are completely different. Lenin hated Stalin and there was a dramatic shift in policy when Stalin took over. Do you think there would have been a NEP in response to the Krondstand rebellion had Stalin been in power?
Communism is not synonymous with Stalinism, Maoism, or Leninism. Do some research before you make statements like this.
And even so, only the regimes of Stalin or Mao could even be remotely compared to Hitler's. Stalin for all of his megalomania was actually an ardent socialist who thought his actions would bring happiness to Russia. Admittedly looney man.
Socialism is hardly an evil ideology. Turn off Glenn Beck for a couple minutes son.
@CEShannVfB Stalin was doing exactly what his financiers were telling him to do. The millions of death in the Ukraine was to satisfy the demands of the British banks and the Rothschilds. Stalin was in no position in the 1930's to fight the Jews who held the USSR's existence in their hands. The banks demand their return on investment and they don't care if millions died in the Ukraine or in the World Trade Center to satisfy their balance sheets.
Eugene V Debs is the finest example of a socialist
You are right but wrong comrade. Communism is synonymous with Stalinism, Maoism and Leninism, but The following idealogies only achieved socialism in that given time. Communism was another step, and will need new leaders building upon the genius of Stalin, lenin and Mao.
@CEShannVfB Why is it that in implementing Socialism/Communism/Nation Socialism, the most evil persons rise to the top? For a good explanation, read Chapter 10, "Why the Worst Get on Top" in F.A. Hayek's book THE ROAD TO SERFDOM.
@CEShannVfB What do you mean by "evil"? Do you mean some people banded together and concocted Socialist Ideology while thinking:"This is Evil, and we gonna destroy the whole humanity with it", (caclkes)?
In fact , Socialism is evil, despite and BECAUSE, people engage in the Cause with the best intentions in the World!
@ErnstJoy You are thinking way too much into this. Don't turn what was originally intended as a refutation to anti-socialist propagandists, who associate socialism with ideologies which idolize warfare and oppression, into a philosophical or semantic debate.
@CEShannVfB Socialism has failed everywhere it has been tried. True Capitalism has succeded everywhere its been tried. True Capitalism has and can exist, yet every communist says that communism is either impossible to implant or hasnt been implanted so far. Capitalism has a huge advantage, we've seen it work hundreds of times for nearly two hundred years. Socialism has only failed for one hundred years. 100 years of failure versus 200 years of soaring success.
@GermanConquistador08 Truly and utterly false. Socialism is succeeding in numerous European nations, and true capitalism fails. Look at the Great Depression. It literally could have killed the United States if there hadn't been a world war to fuel the awful thing that is capitalism.
@Max17766 "and true capitalism fails" -Where? "ook at the Great Depression. It literally could have killed the United States if there hadn't been a world war to fuel the awful thing that is capitalism." - Oh right the great depression. Well, it DIDNT kill the US and while the US had a depression and the worse that happened was mass inflation and unemployment, in Russia during the depression there was famine, death by the millions and tyranny of the worst order.
@Max17766 And WWII did NOT fixed the great depression. Yes they took all of the unemployeed and sent them either off to war or work in factories but it was the economic BOOM when the soldiers came back that brought the US over the hump of the depression, NOT the war. Yes the war helped because they employeed the population to go and fight but wars dont create anything. The rebuilding does however.
@GermanConquistador08 You're kidding, aren't you? You do realise that the massive amount of equipment, the aircraft, everything that needs to be built during a war effort was the blood of the US economy in the war. Not to mention income taxation spreading the wealth.
@Max17766 "You do realise that the massive amount of equipment, the aircraft, everything that needs to be built during a war effort was the blood of the US economy in the war" - No it wasnt. War material has no economic worth if its used by the military of the country which is producing it, only military worth. Equipment is only economically useful when its sold to other countries otherwise its just stockpiled or junked after wars end, no wealth is created in its creation.
@Max17766 Yeah it was the blood of the US economy because there wasnt ANYTHING else produced at that time. Consumer good production was at an all time low, debt was still higher than ever. War economies arent geared for wealth theyre geared for war. This is basic economics, war doesnt produce in fact it destroys material. "Not to mention income taxation spreading the wealth." -Wealth redistribution ALWAYS, always causes LESS wealth because it takes resources even if you....
@Max17766 ACTUALLY spread the wealth, even though tax money during the war usually ONLY lead to the making of war. An economy is measured on wealth creation and employment. You cant count the military in employment either. We could eliminate all umeployment by drafting every unemployed person into the army. Everyone would have a job but there would be no one to make food and consumer goods, in fact more would have to be produced unable to. DO you see why war doesnt create a better economy yet?
@GermanConquistador08 Socialism has failed everywhere? What exactly is Sweden? Or the economic miracle in Britain after WWII? And Captialism has succeeded everywhere? Modern Russia is a glowing example of failed capitalism. They have gone from totalitarian communism to vicious and unrestrained capitalism... and they are doing so wonderfully.
@CEShannVfB "What exactly is Sweden?" - The only reason Scandinavia was able to impliment socialistic systems is because of the economic surplus' they've had since the begining of the 20th century through capitalism. Also, Sweden had a significantly lower population, a far better established middle class, more capital investment (through war countries, particularly German in both World wars) and has almost no diversity. Thats why socialistic system have been stable in Scandinavia.
@CEShannVfB Places like Britain and Germany before WWI implimented moderate social welfare systems with the use of their colonies, as for the economic mircale in post-WWII European nations two things must be remembered 1. Massive loss in the workforce and industrial expansion meant that most of these countries were saddled with MASSIVE debt, but had a smaller population, more jobs being converted from war to consumer material which significantly boasted demand and thus supply.
@CEShannVfB The destruction brought on by war means rebuilding, and the conductor of that rebuilding was the UNITED STATES, the only country in the equation WITHOUT a social economy. The marshall plan and American military support largely allowed these countries to grow solely on their consumer needs, thus the economic "mircales" of post-WWII Europe. Thats another reason why socialism works well in Europe, most of these countries have VERY small militaries because the US military supports them
@CEShannVfB If NATO didnt exist, ALL of Europe would be bankrupt or running huge deficits, not just Spain, Portugal, Italy and Greece (all examples of how unrestricted socialism fails) "Modern Russia is a glowing example of failed capitalism" - So the ONLY example you can find to counter my several examples is a country where previously communism reigned supreme economically and totalitarianism reigned unchecked ffor more than 70 years? See why socialism fails yet?
@CEShannVfB "They have gone from totalitarian communism to vicious and unrestrained capitalism" - In communist Russia if you buy something for 1 ruble and sell it for 3 its called profiteering and punishable by years of jail time. Do you see why socialism fails yet? So these people having had NO buisness for 70 years and NO democratic experience for...EVER (the fall of the USSR was Russia's FIRST taste of true democracy) you expect them to magically have rule of law and private property?
@CEShannVfB "and they are doing so wonderfully" - They're doing better than under the USSR. You know who else? Poland. Poland is an excellent example of capitalism. Over 400 hundred years of occupation broken by only a 40 year stint of freedom and with capitalism they're able to become the most successful eastern european countries to break free from the iron curtain. Are you convinced yet or do you need more? Chile, Mexico, China, India, South Korea. See it yet?
@GermanConquistador08 You need to come down. Talk about overposting. Fact of the matter is: You said capitalism is always successful, socialism is never successful. Both of which are false. You can make as many excuses as you want, but the words always and never are going to trip you up no matter what.
@CEShannVfB "Talk about overposting" - Its one of those situations where youre claims are so incorrect on multiple levels it takes longer to explain why youre wrong than the actual statement you made. "You said capitalism is always successful" - Which is true and you havnt made a point to counter it that was correct. "socialism is never successful" - They're not sustainable, radical socialists are always failures and social democracies are fiscally unstable.
@CEShannVfB "you can make as many excuses as you want" - Excuses to you= historical examples, economic points, etc. "By the way, Mexico is a chaos right now" -The Mexican economy is the 16th largest in the world and is an industrializing nation with a large and growing middle class, the crime problem is partially due to socialism. For 70 years the leftist party PRI (Partitdo Revolutionario Institucional) ruled the country in a virtual dictatorship.
@CEShannVfB Which is why I referenced Mexico. A growing economy which is actually causing Mexicans to move BACK to Mexico, and growing due to the election of the PAN (Partido Accion Nacional) party which is slowly dismanteling the socialist systems that have been in place there. India's poverty rate was cut in half in the 1970s and 80s due to the opening up of markets, the implimentation of less regulation and greater rule of law.
@CEShannVfB The political corruption continues due to the still massive amount of regulation within the Indian economy. China using select capitalistic ideas is the only reason why its able to feed its people where before tens of millions were starving. These countries are FAR from in good condition, but my examples were that the implimentation of capitalism in favor of socialism vastly improves the standard of living for the people of these countries. Can you argue against that?
@GermanConquistador08 So Sweden's success is thanks in large part to its history of capitalist surplus, but China's success is due completely to modern reform in favor of Capitalism? That's called a double-standard
I'm sorry, but you are judging on broad political and economic theory by the soviet model, and that alone undermines your credibility. You are manipulating facts to fit your conclusion, so I am done here.
@CEShannVfB "So Sweden's success is thanks in large part to its history of capitalist surplus, but China's success is due completely to modern reform in favor of Capitalism?" - Yes, how is that contradictory? And no, these countries economic stability is due to capitalism, their current state of affairs are very different still, they are in different development stages after all.
@CEShannVfB "but you are judging on broad political and economic theory by the soviet model, and that alone undermines your credibility" - I'm judging the "broad political and economic theory BY the soviet model" No i'm not judging socialism by the USSR, radical socialism is communism and its not the same thing as socialism I understand that. Socialism is a blanket statement, and I made the distinction between radical socialism and social democracy, so I'm not manipulating anything.
Germany never gave up the fight for world control. With the US stuck in Afghanistan and Irak wasting its wealth making new enemies, Germany made a large leap forward. Having lost two open wars to become the dominating power on earth, Germany reverted to the tactics used before 1914 and between1918-1939: Infiltrating other countries with snitchers, manipulating them and draw as much wealth as possible from these victims of German greed. My brother Markus Bott was murdered because of our homepage
Maybe I'm just being a romantic, but I feel like politics were different some hundred years ago or so. People just seemed more willing to change things. There wasn't as much cynicism as there is now. People had hope. It was just completely different. Liberty and freedom meant something. Now they're just used as talking points by politicians.
cyllansse Pour répondre a ton odieux message, la France, qu'est ce qu'elle est actuellement ? Elle est capitaliste ! Pour te mettre a jour lit l'Humanité tu comprendra ce que c'est le capitalisme. Et par la même occasion les actions de gauche...
Tio Lenin, que pena. Nos combatieron, nos utilizaron, nos pusieron palos en las ruedas, decian que eramos peligrosos. Ya ves... no hemos destruido el mundo, otros ya se encargan de eso. Que razon tenias cuando nos avisastes de quien era Stalin. Ahora hay mas guerras que nunca, los ricos son mas ricos, los pobres son mas pobres, ¿no sabes como le llaman a esto? dicen que es el "nuevo orden mundial. ¡ La madre que los pario¡ Ahhh...una cosa mas: lo estan consiguiendo. Hay mas tontos que nunca.
@johnross12 Right...explain how it is "evil." I would rather die in a collectivist military Gulag than in the factories of 19th Century England. Go check out the sadler report. Then tell me that communism is evil. skip to the portion with Mr. Matthew Crabtree. If you type "Sadler Report" into wikipedia you should be able to scroll down to their sources and find the excerpts from "History.hanover.edu"
Brought to you in the best quality the imploding socialist state can afford! Praise the Premier!
cerickNY 3 days ago
lorsque le prolétariat aura de sa main de fer écrasé la bourgeoisie rapace et capitaliste,on ne jouera plus sur les nerfs du peuple affamé avec l"archet de la démagogie
RAZBOUDINE 4 days ago
Glória e honra aos povos que lutaram e deram suas preciosas vidas pelo socialismo. Hurra!
Armando1735 1 week ago
Remember this time when workers from the whole world united
. Greetings from France !
ThePalador 1 month ago
National socialism is by far the best system that can be achieved however not to the extent and radicalism of that of hitler's. people need to put history aside for Germany was the best place to live in b4 the war started... in 1936 it hosted the olympics! This system does work once u have the right people in power...
ofer100000 1 month ago
Comment removed
dave59934 3 weeks ago
@ofer100000 You know that you're talking realt shit here right? Millions of people (alot of germans themselves amongst others) were killed in Nazi Germany. And a lot of these people cause they we're communists. What Hitler did was as far away from socialism as china is today. Fascism is never a good system, never forget that.
dave59934 3 weeks ago
@ofer100000 Germany is still the best place to live! Einigkeit und Recht und Freiheit!
2XxManUnitedxX2 2 weeks ago
@2XxManUnitedxX2 Unfortunately Germany is not the best place to live anymore... when u consider all the dirty Muslims
ofer100000 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
2XxManUnitedxX2 2 weeks ago
The massive amount of deaths attributed with Stalin come from a Cold War-era Historian named Robert Conquest and Khrushchev. Conquest's 20 million deaths claim comes from Khrushchev's secret speech. Modern Historian John Getty has proven that the real number wasn't anywhere near 20 million, rather 1.5 million. Grover Furr's new book "Khrushchev Lied" has also proven that Khrushchev's secret speech wasn't honest.
Face it, the USA uses propaganda just like any other country.
havee3333333 1 month ago
Vive la France
MonsieurSM7 1 month ago
The top comment is bullshit.
AtheismCentral 3 months ago
Comment removed
havee3333333 1 month ago
@AtheismCentral
I thought it was an alright comment. It had mostly truth in it.
havee3333333 1 month ago
Ебет сталина. Слава марксу енгелсу и ленину!
lukazz434 3 months ago
Glory to Socialism!
Glory to Communism!
Down with stalinist traitors!
TheSmirlis 3 months ago 8
All the history of my grand-parents... Greetings from France !
1981Badfish 3 months ago
ironically, labor day originated in Detroit, Michigan
eddielung31 3 months ago
Dude you need to connect your recordplayer to ground!
lustigerhuppifluppi 4 months ago
long live revolution.....
any way, to demolish this fucking capitalism and for equality between people in the world........ SOCIALISM IS THE ONLY ALTERNATIVE.
midhunmohanvm 4 months ago 4
Muito me emociona ouvir esta versão da Internacional em francês. Viva a França.
virduarte100 5 months ago
Socialism means equal opportunities for all and meeting basic human needs in health, housing, education and energy. If these things are missing in your life it's because someone else is stealing your rights, in other words the Capitalist system is allowing them to do so.
homeros8000 5 months ago
depuis 1945 le PCF n a pas arrete de pactiser avec la droute pour envoyer dans le mur les revoltes populairesvous voulez un exemple dans une municipalite PCF-CGT on trouve des terrains constructibles a 900 euros mettre a genoux un petit proprietaire pour faire un lycee a la causecsu et sucrer les apparachick au passage
bollargeau 6 months ago
@mrdeathbycheese12 You're right, I actually intended it to say "Socialism is not synonymous..." when I wrote it out, but sadly Youtube doesn't have an edit feature so I just left it as is.
Though, it is important to realize that Lenin himself was forced to reshape Leninism, case in point being the NEP. Truth be told, neither Stalinism, Maoism, nor even Leninism is perfectly concordant with Lenin's aspirations as they are laid out in, say, "State and Revolution."
But yes, you are right.
CEShannVfB 7 months ago 2
Communism is a utopia, but socialism is righteous for all people ,in essence the communists must fight for socialism.
Mikele22000 8 months ago
Trés belle chanson, vive la france et le communisme !
beu1345 9 months ago
The French Revolution was the ugliest bloodbath in History so far. Never before had so many human beings be slaughtered in the name of "liberty, equality, fraternity".
Iggy3d 10 months ago
@Iggy3d
Before the French Revolution, people (in many Europeans countries including France, Austria, Spain, Prussia or Russia) were slaves of their Kings. In 1789 French decided to be free.
And the Revolution was a bloodbath because others countries attacked France, they want the death of the Republic because they fear for their own crown.
Aerilmellon 9 months ago
@Iggy3d If you think the guillotine is ugly(It was made to be painless.), take a look at what the monarchs of Europe were doing right before the revolution. Some monarchs had killed tens of thousands of people during their reigns (Although monarchs rule for life. So, the timespan is more larger.) 18-century execution techniques in Europe were often horrifically cruel. And, the monarchists were also causing terror in France during the revolution. Ever know about the White Terror.....
DinodudeEpic 7 months ago
@DinodudeEpic The monarchy was corrupt and brutal, that is true. However, when you preach the great ideals of "Liberty, Equality and Fraternity" and THEN go on slaughtering hundreds of thousands of your own citizens, let alone the foreign country that you attack and destroy, you are bound to be called a sadistic hypocrite, just like the king and his henchmen that you pretend to replace. As for your remark about the guillotine being painless, I would suggest you try it out and then let me know.
Iggy3d 7 months ago
@Iggy3d I was merely saying the Revolution wasn't the ugliest bloodbath in History so far(That title would go to the Mongols.). Also, Robespierre's regime wasn't the entire revolution. There was the Directory, which didn't commit a Reign of Terror.
Also, I never said the guillotine was painless, I said it was MADE to be painless. The purpose of it was to give everyone painless and equal executions. Whether it fulfilled it's purpose is unknown.
DinodudeEpic 7 months ago
@Iggy3d Also, speaking of ugly things. The bourbon kings AND queen had hordes of prostitutes....Either way, I do agree that Robespierre was a douche-bag. But, he wasn't around for the entirety of the revolution (The directory.) and the revolution wasn't the worst bloodbath of it's time. The Spanish inquisition was still in place, and there were lots of WAY more brutal and deadly events before the French Revolution.
DinodudeEpic 7 months ago
Well , the number one is US Navy anthem, this Internationale song should be number two , whatever the language .
huynhminhtri 11 months ago
costruiamo un mondo più giusto e più libero. abbattiamo il capitale vera schiavitù dell'umanità
gattuso63 1 year ago
I am so ashamed of my country when I listen to this. 90 million human being slaughtered by this sick ideology and still no Nurnberg trial for Communists and henchmen.
Iggy3d 1 year ago
@Iggy3d Ideologies don't kill people. People kill people.
SomeoneCrazy2 10 months ago
@Iggy3d We first need a Nurnberg trial for the neoliberals and their sick ideology that starved to death hundreds of millions around the globe. An inhuman ideology that usually was imposed using traditional dictatorship methods and tortures. An ideology that still is alive while Communism belongs to the past. And a ideology that is promoted by a tiny stratum of mega bankers and money makers that think that human genes or software code are patent-able... Grow up and face real enemies dear...
overthrowtheIMFjunta 5 months ago
communism is inherently anti human instinct which is greed and selfishness, the world is not yet ready for the egalitarian socialist utopia where we are not self serving but other serving, the time will come when all in society are valued equally, when we do truly own the means of production and we are valued beyond the elites reach and the capatilist nightmare is once and truly demolished
symphonythree 1 year ago
being 12 isn't an excuse.
TCharlieA 1 year ago 22
@TCharlieA It is not an excuse, it is a reason
markinbohol 1 year ago
Communism and socialism could never work, and will never work. It's impossible. The same as national socialism. Hungary lived both of them and thank you, it was enough. Every socialist party should be ignored.
Vincenzo19901218 1 year ago
@Vincenzo19901218
neither does capitalism. as long as people are selfish enough to want more than the others have, no system can actually work.
@johnross12
no, they don't!
what could possibly make pure racism look nice?
of course, millions of people have been killed under Stalin's regime, like under Hitler's.
Still i think the idea itself of communism or a society in which all people are equal isn't bad. people just refuse to make it work.
kuyrli 1 year ago
As a general response to the comments: don't lump Stalin and Lenin together as one person, they are completely different. Lenin hated Stalin and there was a dramatic shift in policy when Stalin took over. Do you think there would have been a NEP in response to the Krondstand rebellion had Stalin been in power?
MyVacillation 1 year ago 3
Used as football fight song at East Louisiana U. Go Chevaliers!!
BrokenneckYgor 1 year ago
@BrokenneckYgor R U lying? That's pretty funny! I suppose Go Chevaliers!
darthnarodnik 1 year ago
keep fighting we do the same in greece....
keep fighting comrades!
G7Stalin 1 year ago
don't complain about the quality if your a communist.
mysterion2626 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Communists make Nazis seem like nice people.
johnross12 1 year ago
@johnross12
Communism is not synonymous with Stalinism, Maoism, or Leninism. Do some research before you make statements like this.
And even so, only the regimes of Stalin or Mao could even be remotely compared to Hitler's. Stalin for all of his megalomania was actually an ardent socialist who thought his actions would bring happiness to Russia. Admittedly looney man.
Socialism is hardly an evil ideology. Turn off Glenn Beck for a couple minutes son.
CEShannVfB 1 year ago 116
@CEShannVfB
Hitler thought his actions would bring happiness to Germany, too.
SquidFan 1 year ago
@CEShannVfB Nothing like ignorance. I guess Stalin, Lenin, and Mao were good capitalists. The only place communism works is in cartoons.
johnross12 1 year ago
@CEShannVfB Ты лушче переведи на русский.
TheDement68 1 year ago
@CEShannVfB Stalin was doing exactly what his financiers were telling him to do. The millions of death in the Ukraine was to satisfy the demands of the British banks and the Rothschilds. Stalin was in no position in the 1930's to fight the Jews who held the USSR's existence in their hands. The banks demand their return on investment and they don't care if millions died in the Ukraine or in the World Trade Center to satisfy their balance sheets.
Eugene V Debs is the finest example of a socialist
InfiniteMushroom 1 year ago
@CEShannVfB You cant compare them in that they all killed millions of their own people ?
lilwillywicked 10 months ago
@CEShannVfB
indeed, comerade.
kennykyle133 8 months ago
@CEShannVfB
You are right but wrong comrade. Communism is synonymous with Stalinism, Maoism and Leninism, but The following idealogies only achieved socialism in that given time. Communism was another step, and will need new leaders building upon the genius of Stalin, lenin and Mao.
Peace and love comrade
AtheismCentral 8 months ago
@CEShannVfB Why is it that in implementing Socialism/Communism/Nation Socialism, the most evil persons rise to the top? For a good explanation, read Chapter 10, "Why the Worst Get on Top" in F.A. Hayek's book THE ROAD TO SERFDOM.
powertothebees 6 months ago
@CEShannVfB What do you mean by "evil"? Do you mean some people banded together and concocted Socialist Ideology while thinking:"This is Evil, and we gonna destroy the whole humanity with it", (caclkes)?
In fact , Socialism is evil, despite and BECAUSE, people engage in the Cause with the best intentions in the World!
ErnstJoy 4 months ago
@ErnstJoy You are thinking way too much into this. Don't turn what was originally intended as a refutation to anti-socialist propagandists, who associate socialism with ideologies which idolize warfare and oppression, into a philosophical or semantic debate.
CEShannVfB 4 months ago
@CEShannVfB Socialism has failed everywhere it has been tried. True Capitalism has succeded everywhere its been tried. True Capitalism has and can exist, yet every communist says that communism is either impossible to implant or hasnt been implanted so far. Capitalism has a huge advantage, we've seen it work hundreds of times for nearly two hundred years. Socialism has only failed for one hundred years. 100 years of failure versus 200 years of soaring success.
GermanConquistador08 1 week ago
@GermanConquistador08 Truly and utterly false. Socialism is succeeding in numerous European nations, and true capitalism fails. Look at the Great Depression. It literally could have killed the United States if there hadn't been a world war to fuel the awful thing that is capitalism.
Max17766 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Max17766 "and true capitalism fails" -Where? "ook at the Great Depression. It literally could have killed the United States if there hadn't been a world war to fuel the awful thing that is capitalism." - Oh right the great depression. Well, it DIDNT kill the US and while the US had a depression and the worse that happened was mass inflation and unemployment, in Russia during the depression there was famine, death by the millions and tyranny of the worst order.
GermanConquistador08 1 week ago
@Max17766 And WWII did NOT fixed the great depression. Yes they took all of the unemployeed and sent them either off to war or work in factories but it was the economic BOOM when the soldiers came back that brought the US over the hump of the depression, NOT the war. Yes the war helped because they employeed the population to go and fight but wars dont create anything. The rebuilding does however.
GermanConquistador08 1 week ago
@GermanConquistador08 You're kidding, aren't you? You do realise that the massive amount of equipment, the aircraft, everything that needs to be built during a war effort was the blood of the US economy in the war. Not to mention income taxation spreading the wealth.
Max17766 1 week ago
@Max17766 "You do realise that the massive amount of equipment, the aircraft, everything that needs to be built during a war effort was the blood of the US economy in the war" - No it wasnt. War material has no economic worth if its used by the military of the country which is producing it, only military worth. Equipment is only economically useful when its sold to other countries otherwise its just stockpiled or junked after wars end, no wealth is created in its creation.
GermanConquistador08 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Max17766 Yeah it was the blood of the US economy because there wasnt ANYTHING else produced at that time. Consumer good production was at an all time low, debt was still higher than ever. War economies arent geared for wealth theyre geared for war. This is basic economics, war doesnt produce in fact it destroys material. "Not to mention income taxation spreading the wealth." -Wealth redistribution ALWAYS, always causes LESS wealth because it takes resources even if you....
GermanConquistador08 1 week ago
@Max17766 ACTUALLY spread the wealth, even though tax money during the war usually ONLY lead to the making of war. An economy is measured on wealth creation and employment. You cant count the military in employment either. We could eliminate all umeployment by drafting every unemployed person into the army. Everyone would have a job but there would be no one to make food and consumer goods, in fact more would have to be produced unable to. DO you see why war doesnt create a better economy yet?
GermanConquistador08 1 week ago
@GermanConquistador08 Socialism has failed everywhere? What exactly is Sweden? Or the economic miracle in Britain after WWII? And Captialism has succeeded everywhere? Modern Russia is a glowing example of failed capitalism. They have gone from totalitarian communism to vicious and unrestrained capitalism... and they are doing so wonderfully.
CEShannVfB 22 hours ago
@CEShannVfB "What exactly is Sweden?" - The only reason Scandinavia was able to impliment socialistic systems is because of the economic surplus' they've had since the begining of the 20th century through capitalism. Also, Sweden had a significantly lower population, a far better established middle class, more capital investment (through war countries, particularly German in both World wars) and has almost no diversity. Thats why socialistic system have been stable in Scandinavia.
GermanConquistador08 21 hours ago
@CEShannVfB Places like Britain and Germany before WWI implimented moderate social welfare systems with the use of their colonies, as for the economic mircale in post-WWII European nations two things must be remembered 1. Massive loss in the workforce and industrial expansion meant that most of these countries were saddled with MASSIVE debt, but had a smaller population, more jobs being converted from war to consumer material which significantly boasted demand and thus supply.
GermanConquistador08 21 hours ago
@CEShannVfB The destruction brought on by war means rebuilding, and the conductor of that rebuilding was the UNITED STATES, the only country in the equation WITHOUT a social economy. The marshall plan and American military support largely allowed these countries to grow solely on their consumer needs, thus the economic "mircales" of post-WWII Europe. Thats another reason why socialism works well in Europe, most of these countries have VERY small militaries because the US military supports them
GermanConquistador08 21 hours ago
@CEShannVfB If NATO didnt exist, ALL of Europe would be bankrupt or running huge deficits, not just Spain, Portugal, Italy and Greece (all examples of how unrestricted socialism fails) "Modern Russia is a glowing example of failed capitalism" - So the ONLY example you can find to counter my several examples is a country where previously communism reigned supreme economically and totalitarianism reigned unchecked ffor more than 70 years? See why socialism fails yet?
GermanConquistador08 21 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@CEShannVfB "They have gone from totalitarian communism to vicious and unrestrained capitalism" - In communist Russia if you buy something for 1 ruble and sell it for 3 its called profiteering and punishable by years of jail time. Do you see why socialism fails yet? So these people having had NO buisness for 70 years and NO democratic experience for...EVER (the fall of the USSR was Russia's FIRST taste of true democracy) you expect them to magically have rule of law and private property?
GermanConquistador08 21 hours ago
@CEShannVfB "and they are doing so wonderfully" - They're doing better than under the USSR. You know who else? Poland. Poland is an excellent example of capitalism. Over 400 hundred years of occupation broken by only a 40 year stint of freedom and with capitalism they're able to become the most successful eastern european countries to break free from the iron curtain. Are you convinced yet or do you need more? Chile, Mexico, China, India, South Korea. See it yet?
GermanConquistador08 21 hours ago
@GermanConquistador08 You need to come down. Talk about overposting. Fact of the matter is: You said capitalism is always successful, socialism is never successful. Both of which are false. You can make as many excuses as you want, but the words always and never are going to trip you up no matter what.
CEShannVfB 18 hours ago
@CEShannVfB "Talk about overposting" - Its one of those situations where youre claims are so incorrect on multiple levels it takes longer to explain why youre wrong than the actual statement you made. "You said capitalism is always successful" - Which is true and you havnt made a point to counter it that was correct. "socialism is never successful" - They're not sustainable, radical socialists are always failures and social democracies are fiscally unstable.
GermanConquistador08 16 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@CEShannVfB "you can make as many excuses as you want" - Excuses to you= historical examples, economic points, etc. "By the way, Mexico is a chaos right now" -The Mexican economy is the 16th largest in the world and is an industrializing nation with a large and growing middle class, the crime problem is partially due to socialism. For 70 years the leftist party PRI (Partitdo Revolutionario Institucional) ruled the country in a virtual dictatorship.
GermanConquistador08 16 hours ago
@CEShannVfB Which is why I referenced Mexico. A growing economy which is actually causing Mexicans to move BACK to Mexico, and growing due to the election of the PAN (Partido Accion Nacional) party which is slowly dismanteling the socialist systems that have been in place there. India's poverty rate was cut in half in the 1970s and 80s due to the opening up of markets, the implimentation of less regulation and greater rule of law.
GermanConquistador08 15 hours ago
@GermanConquistador08 By the way, Mexico is a chaos right now, India has rampant political corruption, and China is still COMMUNIST....
You cannot be that stupid.
CEShannVfB 18 hours ago
@CEShannVfB The political corruption continues due to the still massive amount of regulation within the Indian economy. China using select capitalistic ideas is the only reason why its able to feed its people where before tens of millions were starving. These countries are FAR from in good condition, but my examples were that the implimentation of capitalism in favor of socialism vastly improves the standard of living for the people of these countries. Can you argue against that?
GermanConquistador08 15 hours ago
@GermanConquistador08 So Sweden's success is thanks in large part to its history of capitalist surplus, but China's success is due completely to modern reform in favor of Capitalism? That's called a double-standard
I'm sorry, but you are judging on broad political and economic theory by the soviet model, and that alone undermines your credibility. You are manipulating facts to fit your conclusion, so I am done here.
CEShannVfB 11 hours ago
@CEShannVfB "So Sweden's success is thanks in large part to its history of capitalist surplus, but China's success is due completely to modern reform in favor of Capitalism?" - Yes, how is that contradictory? And no, these countries economic stability is due to capitalism, their current state of affairs are very different still, they are in different development stages after all.
GermanConquistador08 8 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@CEShannVfB "but you are judging on broad political and economic theory by the soviet model, and that alone undermines your credibility" - I'm judging the "broad political and economic theory BY the soviet model" No i'm not judging socialism by the USSR, radical socialism is communism and its not the same thing as socialism I understand that. Socialism is a blanket statement, and I made the distinction between radical socialism and social democracy, so I'm not manipulating anything.
GermanConquistador08 8 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Germany never gave up the fight for world control. With the US stuck in Afghanistan and Irak wasting its wealth making new enemies, Germany made a large leap forward. Having lost two open wars to become the dominating power on earth, Germany reverted to the tactics used before 1914 and between1918-1939: Infiltrating other countries with snitchers, manipulating them and draw as much wealth as possible from these victims of German greed. My brother Markus Bott was murdered because of our homepage
wwwtotalitaerde 1 year ago
Maybe I'm just being a romantic, but I feel like politics were different some hundred years ago or so. People just seemed more willing to change things. There wasn't as much cynicism as there is now. People had hope. It was just completely different. Liberty and freedom meant something. Now they're just used as talking points by politicians.
jasezer 1 year ago
this is not the original, it is actually with the melody from la marseillaise, and this is not the marseillaise.
ShayCarlFan1000 1 year ago
cyllansse Pour répondre a ton odieux message, la France, qu'est ce qu'elle est actuellement ? Elle est capitaliste ! Pour te mettre a jour lit l'Humanité tu comprendra ce que c'est le capitalisme. Et par la même occasion les actions de gauche...
Cirnosius 1 year ago
you done good kid merci beaucoup comrade!
MrBillcale 1 year ago
Poor audio
Flossferry 1 year ago
POURQUOI LE DRAPEAU FRANCAIS EST IL ASSOCIE A CETTE MERDE ?
HEUREUSEMENT QUE LA FRANCE C EST AUTRE CHOSE QUE LE CAPITALISME ET LE COMMUNISME !!!!!!!
cyllansse 1 year ago
Great for Labour Day. Thanks.
TedMichaelMorgan 1 year ago
very bad quality
Blad771 1 year ago
(A)
anarksee 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Tio Lenin, que pena. Nos combatieron, nos utilizaron, nos pusieron palos en las ruedas, decian que eramos peligrosos. Ya ves... no hemos destruido el mundo, otros ya se encargan de eso. Que razon tenias cuando nos avisastes de quien era Stalin. Ahora hay mas guerras que nunca, los ricos son mas ricos, los pobres son mas pobres, ¿no sabes como le llaman a esto? dicen que es el "nuevo orden mundial. ¡ La madre que los pario¡ Ahhh...una cosa mas: lo estan consiguiendo. Hay mas tontos que nunca.
mikibcnes 1 year ago
Good job there Korean Kol :). Also good job for posting up the words. I never knew them before. Now I can sing along :)!
Sunflowers159 1 year ago
"i'm only 12" why would you ever mention that Chris Hansen
CommieThreat 1 year ago
Thank you frenchs... for teaching your marxism to Pol Pot
Im sure he did a good job
All Europeans ideologies are good, we have to copy here in America
trifulquita15 1 year ago
@trifulquita15 Marx wasn't french you fucking idiot
TheBlindPowerslave 1 year ago
@TheBlindPowerslave If somebody says: "cubans were teaching marxism to Hugo Chavez", you´ll say "Marx wasn´t cuban you fucking idiot"
trifulquita15 1 year ago
@trifulquita15 What did America teach Pinochet?
shaygahweh 1 year ago
@shaygahweh America or Nixon administration?
trifulquita15 1 year ago
I sing this b aby in the shower.---Gamal Nasser
BrokenneckYgor 1 year ago
tets
cakgopar 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Loose Change
Loose Change Final Cut
911 mysteries
HAARP
Lait, Mensonges et Propagande
diet for a new America
reddemocary 1 year ago
Ok! stavo per perdere la pzienza.. ehm.
dorapezzilli 1 year ago
C'est Gavroche aux barricades! A quand les nouvelles barricades?
ANTOONMAKA 1 year ago
I love it!!
380800 1 year ago
hahahha you're only 12. Little communist :)
dawar1 2 years ago
Finally! I've been looking for a version in French just like this? Where can I download this version?
appledozeLeonTaz 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
wow i didnt know that the internationale is from French :O Gay Stalin, fuck the dictators! damn USSR
gabrocki 2 years ago
Where does the recording come from? It actually sounds quite interesting. Thanks for posting this.
Sundialonthejob 2 years ago
perfect!!!
thx for sharing dude
120891314 2 years ago 4
Good job. Well done!
canyoutu 2 years ago 8
Great song!!!!
Ninelon 2 years ago 24
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@Ninelon Nice melody for an evil ideology.
johnross12 1 year ago
@johnross12 Right...explain how it is "evil." I would rather die in a collectivist military Gulag than in the factories of 19th Century England. Go check out the sadler report. Then tell me that communism is evil. skip to the portion with Mr. Matthew Crabtree. If you type "Sadler Report" into wikipedia you should be able to scroll down to their sources and find the excerpts from "History.hanover.edu"
CaeserAexix 1 year ago
@johnross12 dude! watch it! your retardation is flooding the internet
CaptainFluffy6644 1 year ago 2
@CaptainFluffy6644 I guess your love of insults shows just how advanced and superior you are.
johnross12 1 year ago
Video doesn't until about 0:08.
KoreanKol 3 years ago 7
@KoreanKol. Well done and greetings from Ireland
RamsesIreland 1 year ago
How can you upload if your 12, don't you need to be 18 and above?
AJ15ist 1 year ago