if there is a question of whether magnets have energy in them, take a big rock, heavy as you can lift. lift it and place your foot under it........then let go of the rock...........
LOL
if there is a scream..............then there is energy in a magnet and the energy from the screem
exactly, of course how to use it is a different question; it's already in use, but we want more, longer...and free (lol)...sun shining long enough, so can do work magnet, we can run solar panels already and we will run magnet motors as well, and as long as magnet last, will we? (lol)...
well, why should i block anyone giving reasonable comments?
aster just keep saying "magnets are NOT a source of energy", and i already pointed him where he's wrong, why should i spend more time on this?
magnets are the source of energy, POTENTIAL, the more energy was injected in it (magnetization) the more time this energy can be released, is it so hard to understand?
if magnet is not source of energy, then the sun, wind, hydro, thermal, capacitors, batteries are neither...
they call it "quick charging system", it's not OU, it's a recuperation system, and if it works so efficient as it claims it makes it remarkable different from hundreds claims of "working OU", which is not
.
the term FE is not meaning perpetual motion, it means having extra useful energy, say, solar battery is a FE, wind, hydro, radio, magnets...till it lasts, and this's FE at least by humans standards
@Mopozco Your motor will NEVER be more efficient through having a Willis or Magnacoaster system attached. Conceivably, tuning energy pulses to the rate of rotation of a *brushed* motor could reduce its inefficiency, but this is unrelated to the FREE ENERGY lunacy of converting DC to pulsed DC at a reduced overall power, and calling it over-unity. Test the mechanical output of the motor itself at full load; it is reduced with the Willis system compared to a clean power source.
Imagine if someone made a system that somehow got energy from magnets; if you left it running for long enough, at some point, more energy would have been extracted than the total annihilation energy bound up in the atoms of the constituent elements of the magnets!! Think about that for a second. No, make that a week.
For magnets to provide energy, they would have to undergo nuclear decay, which they don't.
if something was injected with energy it has a potential to release it, that's why they call it a "potential energy", means has ability to do a work;
a magnet releasing it's energy just by having a field passing through which a wire inducing current to drive a motor to do a work, no magnet - no work done,
so magnet is a source of energy;
actually it's a school's physics program, i'm very surprised...
and besides, a magnet really is a magic, since nobody till now do not know exactly what the magnetic field itself is, which gives us a big field for exploring and experimenting...
@Mopozco You contradict yourself. 12 hours ago you said "magnets're a potential energy the same like sun or wind", now you say "if something was injected with energy it has a potential to release it".
According to your new definition of an energy source, any component of a system that does work is an energy source; no conductor - no work done. You don't call electricity magical, despite being as well understood as magnetism (both components of electromagnetism). You demonstrate your ignorance.
We currently use the force of gravity in many ways to subsidize energy production in many systems. Though the rock is not 'on' there is a potential for energy to be released if its movement stops being hindered by normal force- read 'the ground' - (it slips down a hill, etc.) Why can we not harness the pulling force of magnets in much the same way. The biggest obstacle so far is the application of outside force, necessary to harness the energy, takes the 'momentum' from the system.
@FullyRealized A rock at one height may release energy by descending, but its energy is then spent, and at least an equal amount of energy is required to raise it back to its original height to start again. In practice, more energy is required to raise it, and energy is lost on the descent, due to friction and inefficiencies.
This is the same for magnets moving closer to one another and then being pulled back apart again.
Reading your responses have been very disappointing. Asteroceras has taken the time to give you reasonable arguments based in logical examples, and you turn around and respond using circumstantial observations that have no discernible correlation to the noted discrepancy. At least for the sake of interesting debate, one would expect there to be some answers in regards to how this would not violate the first and second law of thermodynamics (pretty fundamental laws).
And besides, if this was the real deal and provided limitless magnet-fed electricity, wouldn't it be reasonable to think that this would be pretty big news and in common use after a minimum of a year of existence? It would be nice to have a little bit of logic and theory to read from your end, instead of bickering with and threatening to block your viewers.
@asteroceras Correct that the energy required to raise it is more than we can generally harness, but you have to consider that we find ways around this in modern science. Hydroelectric dams harness tons of energy from gravity, but only because it has a constant input of potential energy and the right circumstances to harvest it (e.g. location, millions of dollars worth of equipment, etc.).Magnets repel against gravity like systems that require application of energy or force to do so
@FullyRealized There are no "ways around" the laws of thermodynamics.
Hydroelectric dams get their energy from the sun evaporating water, which rains down on hills to be collected by the dam; the water does not just magically appear in order to power a generator, just as energy does not magically appear in order to be extracted from magnets.
@asteroceras How does it necessarily violate the laws of thermodynamics? My physics teacher couldn't explain it. I can't say that your wrong, but how can a magnet apply force to an object without energy? That seems more to defy the laws of physics. I am intrigued to hear your response.
@FullyRealized A magnet can apply a STATIC force to an item indefinitely.
If the distance between them changes (i.e. the system is NOT static), then energy is either released (if the distance decreases), or required (to increase the distance) [reverse this in the case of opposed poles].
The "free energy" systems you see on YouTube claim to skip or reduce the energy requirement to move a magnet back to its original position, which would create energy... violating thermodynamics.
@Mopozco Magnacoaster claims "This head is an add on to the house that needs to add more power to the existing solar or wind project". It clearly states that it ADDS power, which is a lie; it takes away power through EM emissions, heat and noise; it causes -ve efficiency.
FE *is* used as a term for perpetual motion. To clarify for you and others, magnets are NOT a source of energy; magnets have a static field, like gravity; only by first expending energy can that energy be extracted.
@FREEGARYMCKINNON It does not have an efficiency, as for something to have the property of efficiency, it must do useful work. FREE ENERGY machines reduce the efficiency of anything connected to them, while doing nothing of value themselves. Magnacoaster et al are SCAMS.
this's a motor, and yes it's running under a load, so it has COP and efficiency;
but i'm not claiming it's over1...
self-sustaining systems (say, Vorktex) are not OU, but i would say are "energy exchangers", means capable to run closed system under the load for prolong period of time
@Mopozco Vorktex claims to be OU, therefore it is a scam.
What you have is a motor outputting less work than it would if it were powered directly from a battery, without the "Willis" system, therefore it has lost efficiency, which makes the Willis component less than worthless.
@asteroceras Im not sure i completely agreee. so i will continue my research. free energy isnt the best phrase for engineers to use. do you not agree that there are highly efficient devices for alternative energy generation being made by several clever people ?
@FREEGARYMCKINNON FREE ENERGY (in capitals) is the phrase used by most people who believe in perpetual motion machines.
Nobody in the field of FREE ENERGY is "clever". If they were clever, they would: A. Not waste their time trying to make perpetual motion machines, B. Have something else of commercial value to sell that's not a scam.
This is not "alternative energy generation", as no energy is being generated. This is easily verified by qualified third parties.
if there is a question of whether magnets have energy in them, take a big rock, heavy as you can lift. lift it and place your foot under it........then let go of the rock...........
LOL
if there is a scream..............then there is energy in a magnet and the energy from the screem
lol
irondmax 1 month ago
@irondmax
exactly, of course how to use it is a different question; it's already in use, but we want more, longer...and free (lol)...sun shining long enough, so can do work magnet, we can run solar panels already and we will run magnet motors as well, and as long as magnet last, will we? (lol)...
cheers
Mopozco 1 month ago
well, why should i block anyone giving reasonable comments?
aster just keep saying "magnets are NOT a source of energy", and i already pointed him where he's wrong, why should i spend more time on this?
magnets are the source of energy, POTENTIAL, the more energy was injected in it (magnetization) the more time this energy can be released, is it so hard to understand?
if magnet is not source of energy, then the sun, wind, hydro, thermal, capacitors, batteries are neither...
what a joke...
Mopozco 1 month ago
asteroceras
never seen this claim, would you quote it pls;
they call it "quick charging system", it's not OU, it's a recuperation system, and if it works so efficient as it claims it makes it remarkable different from hundreds claims of "working OU", which is not
.
the term FE is not meaning perpetual motion, it means having extra useful energy, say, solar battery is a FE, wind, hydro, radio, magnets...till it lasts, and this's FE at least by humans standards
.
and if i get my motor more effi-
Mopozco 2 months ago
- cient with ANY components, it would be a progress; less power in, more power out till balance will close to 1, is it impossible?..
cheers
Mopozco 2 months ago
@Mopozco Your motor will NEVER be more efficient through having a Willis or Magnacoaster system attached. Conceivably, tuning energy pulses to the rate of rotation of a *brushed* motor could reduce its inefficiency, but this is unrelated to the FREE ENERGY lunacy of converting DC to pulsed DC at a reduced overall power, and calling it over-unity. Test the mechanical output of the motor itself at full load; it is reduced with the Willis system compared to a clean power source.
asteroceras 2 months ago
never say never (lol)
i said ANY components, not Willis's only (and i do not see any proves of his so far)
.
i believe you needa figure out for yourself what's the FE means,
if my motor will run from solar panel it's pretty free to me, and it's not perpetual...
so from magnets...
.
magnets're a potential energy the same like sun or wind, so it means it could be actuated in the same way;
if we can't do it (so far) it does not mean it's impossible; just a few years ago men can't fly...
Mopozco 2 months ago
@Mopozco Magnets are NOT a source of energy.
Imagine if someone made a system that somehow got energy from magnets; if you left it running for long enough, at some point, more energy would have been extracted than the total annihilation energy bound up in the atoms of the constituent elements of the magnets!! Think about that for a second. No, make that a week.
For magnets to provide energy, they would have to undergo nuclear decay, which they don't.
Magnets are NOT a source of energy.
asteroceras 2 months ago
@asteroceras
yes they are (lol), potential one, seems you have to think about it...a month...
it's energy used in all electro-magnetic devices rite now before your own eyes;
how long - long enough, we all be off but magnets still on;
of course eventually they will be expired too by that reason or another, but what's not?...
Mopozco 2 months ago
@Mopozco Magnets are NOT a source of energy.
Magnets can be used to facilitate the conversion of one form of energy into another, but they cannot release energy of themselves.
Neither can they multiply or amplify any form of energy.
Magnets are not magic.
Magnets are not always "on"; they are no more "on" than a rock is "on" by gravitationally attracting the Earth and vice-versa.
Magnets are not doing work just by existing; their fields are static.
Magnets are NOT a source of energy.
asteroceras 2 months ago
@asteroceras
a big one, and getting bigger;
if something was injected with energy it has a potential to release it, that's why they call it a "potential energy", means has ability to do a work;
a magnet releasing it's energy just by having a field passing through which a wire inducing current to drive a motor to do a work, no magnet - no work done,
so magnet is a source of energy;
actually it's a school's physics program, i'm very surprised...
Mopozco 2 months ago
and besides, a magnet really is a magic, since nobody till now do not know exactly what the magnetic field itself is, which gives us a big field for exploring and experimenting...
cheers
Mopozco 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Mopozco You contradict yourself. 12 hours ago you said "magnets're a potential energy the same like sun or wind", now you say "if something was injected with energy it has a potential to release it".
According to your new definition of an energy source, any component of a system that does work is an energy source; no conductor - no work done. You don't call electricity magical, despite being as well understood as magnetism (both components of electromagnetism). You demonstrate your ignorance.
asteroceras 2 months ago
We currently use the force of gravity in many ways to subsidize energy production in many systems. Though the rock is not 'on' there is a potential for energy to be released if its movement stops being hindered by normal force- read 'the ground' - (it slips down a hill, etc.) Why can we not harness the pulling force of magnets in much the same way. The biggest obstacle so far is the application of outside force, necessary to harness the energy, takes the 'momentum' from the system.
FullyRealized 1 month ago
@FullyRealized A rock at one height may release energy by descending, but its energy is then spent, and at least an equal amount of energy is required to raise it back to its original height to start again. In practice, more energy is required to raise it, and energy is lost on the descent, due to friction and inefficiencies.
This is the same for magnets moving closer to one another and then being pulled back apart again.
Momentum is irrelevant.
Magnets are NOT a source of energy.
asteroceras 1 month ago
@asteroceras
yes, they are, and you're using it's energy right now before your own eyes...
pls do not waste my time, if you have nothing to say
or i have to block you,sorry
cheers
Mopozco 1 month ago
@Mopozco
Reading your responses have been very disappointing. Asteroceras has taken the time to give you reasonable arguments based in logical examples, and you turn around and respond using circumstantial observations that have no discernible correlation to the noted discrepancy. At least for the sake of interesting debate, one would expect there to be some answers in regards to how this would not violate the first and second law of thermodynamics (pretty fundamental laws).
eldelectable 1 month ago
@Mopozco
And besides, if this was the real deal and provided limitless magnet-fed electricity, wouldn't it be reasonable to think that this would be pretty big news and in common use after a minimum of a year of existence? It would be nice to have a little bit of logic and theory to read from your end, instead of bickering with and threatening to block your viewers.
eldelectable 1 month ago
@asteroceras Correct that the energy required to raise it is more than we can generally harness, but you have to consider that we find ways around this in modern science. Hydroelectric dams harness tons of energy from gravity, but only because it has a constant input of potential energy and the right circumstances to harvest it (e.g. location, millions of dollars worth of equipment, etc.).Magnets repel against gravity like systems that require application of energy or force to do so
FullyRealized 1 month ago
@FullyRealized There are no "ways around" the laws of thermodynamics.
Hydroelectric dams get their energy from the sun evaporating water, which rains down on hills to be collected by the dam; the water does not just magically appear in order to power a generator, just as energy does not magically appear in order to be extracted from magnets.
Magnets are NOT a source of energy.
asteroceras 1 month ago
@asteroceras
Well done.
eldelectable 1 month ago
@asteroceras How does it necessarily violate the laws of thermodynamics? My physics teacher couldn't explain it. I can't say that your wrong, but how can a magnet apply force to an object without energy? That seems more to defy the laws of physics. I am intrigued to hear your response.
FullyRealized 3 weeks ago
@FullyRealized A magnet can apply a STATIC force to an item indefinitely.
If the distance between them changes (i.e. the system is NOT static), then energy is either released (if the distance decreases), or required (to increase the distance) [reverse this in the case of opposed poles].
The "free energy" systems you see on YouTube claim to skip or reduce the energy requirement to move a magnet back to its original position, which would create energy... violating thermodynamics.
asteroceras 3 weeks ago
@Mopozco Magnacoaster claims "This head is an add on to the house that needs to add more power to the existing solar or wind project". It clearly states that it ADDS power, which is a lie; it takes away power through EM emissions, heat and noise; it causes -ve efficiency.
FE *is* used as a term for perpetual motion. To clarify for you and others, magnets are NOT a source of energy; magnets have a static field, like gravity; only by first expending energy can that energy be extracted.
asteroceras 2 months ago
Great work! Thanks 4 sharing
sMartcreations2010 1 year ago
Whats the efficiency/cop if this set up ?
FREEGARYMCKINNON 1 year ago
@FREEGARYMCKINNON It does not have an efficiency, as for something to have the property of efficiency, it must do useful work. FREE ENERGY machines reduce the efficiency of anything connected to them, while doing nothing of value themselves. Magnacoaster et al are SCAMS.
asteroceras 2 months ago
@asteroceras
yes it does;
this's a motor, and yes it's running under a load, so it has COP and efficiency;
but i'm not claiming it's over1...
self-sustaining systems (say, Vorktex) are not OU, but i would say are "energy exchangers", means capable to run closed system under the load for prolong period of time
cheers
Mopozco 2 months ago
@Mopozco Vorktex claims to be OU, therefore it is a scam.
What you have is a motor outputting less work than it would if it were powered directly from a battery, without the "Willis" system, therefore it has lost efficiency, which makes the Willis component less than worthless.
asteroceras 2 months ago
@asteroceras Im not sure i completely agreee. so i will continue my research. free energy isnt the best phrase for engineers to use. do you not agree that there are highly efficient devices for alternative energy generation being made by several clever people ?
FREEGARYMCKINNON 2 months ago
@FREEGARYMCKINNON FREE ENERGY (in capitals) is the phrase used by most people who believe in perpetual motion machines.
Nobody in the field of FREE ENERGY is "clever". If they were clever, they would: A. Not waste their time trying to make perpetual motion machines, B. Have something else of commercial value to sell that's not a scam.
This is not "alternative energy generation", as no energy is being generated. This is easily verified by qualified third parties.
asteroceras 2 months ago
it's funny, the electron is a slave that doesn't like to work if it can help it.
onthecuttingedge2005 1 year ago
Excellent work! Very clean setup.
marthale7 1 year ago
Thanks for your efforts for sharing with us.
But is there any way to increase video resolution at least 350p.
It will be much helpful to everybody. Thanks.
chungsan1 1 year ago