Added: 2 years ago
From: testskriftene
Views: 646
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (27)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • You are reading too much anti mormon literature and not seeing the real facts:

    - Marinda had no children until his husband came to Nauvoo from Jerusalem in 7 December 1842

    - Orson Washington Hyde was born 9 November 1843

    - Orson Hyde went to washington between 4 April 1844 and 6 August 1844

    - Joseph martyrdom 27 June 1844

    - Frank Hyde birth in 23 january 1846 according his death certificate

    Joseph couldn't be Frank's father and Hyde was with Marinda in the Orson conception.

  • Hey man you so funny?!!! You are saying "eyewitness accounts from dozens of people ". Well Brodie said they were only EIGHT. and she also wrote "It can clearly be seen that the affidavits were written by Hurlbut, since the style is the same throughout. It may be noted also that although five out of the eight had heard Spaulding's story only once, there was a surprising uniformity in the details they remembered after twenty-two years" (Brodie - No Man knows my history) Brodie is anti mormon

  • Well Antis also changed their doctrines too. Loool

    The Spaulding theory is a good example of it. Until the spaulding manuscript was found no one talked about 2 manuscripts. Only after that you guys somehow discovered there were 2 of them. No wonder other well known antis (like brodie and the Tanners) rejected that theory.

    Is also recorded that Rigdon was converted in 1830 reading the BOM and he never meet JS before BOM was published.

  • Well there's enough evidence to convince any jury that antis will invent anything to disacredit JS!!!

    Don't forget many others babies were "accused" as being JS sons and DNA science has shown they weren't..

    I think you are talking about Frank Hyde who was born in 1846 (according his death certificate) after JS death, but Brodie in error said he was born in 1845 and didn't cited sources. Well there's enough proof to shown any jury who are in error! Don't you think?

  • Well Baurak the true is that there's no proof!!! Faw brodie appointed a few children has been children of JS and DNA tests proved they were not!!!

    The anti mormons still are using the marinda hyde baby argument because he died enfant and we don't have descendants to compare with JS descendants.

    That's a common anti mormon tatic!!! they did the same with the BOM DNA. Has we don't know how the Lehi DNA looks like they say there's no lehi descendants in America.

  • Same tactic was used with the spaulding theory. They hide the book and they said BOM was copied from it. Unfortunally for them the book was discovered and everybody can see today that they are very different and theory was rejected by other anti mormon (ex Brodie)

  • Didn't Lehi have Jewish heritage (Alma 10:3)? and if so why does DNA deny any link between Indians and the Jews?

  • Exodus

    I wonder if you ever read Alma 10:3!!! That scripture says Lehi was a MANASSEH descendant (he is not Jewish). You may not know but they are different tribes.

  • So then what about 2 Nephi 30:4 "And then shall the remnant of our seed know concerning us, how that we came out from Jerusalem, and that they are descendants of the JEWS."

    Journal of Discourses 22:173 "The Lamanites, now a down-trodden people, are a remnant of the house of Israel. The curse of God has followed them as it has done the Jews, though the Jews have not been darkened in their skin as have the Lamanites"

  • Exodus and his copy+paste expertise Loool.

    Let me remember what is going on. You wrongly said Lehi had jewish heritage. I correct your inacuracy with your own quote of the BOM. You in place of correcting yourself (as a good Christian should do), you used a scripture out of context. It's sad you are showing your ignorance about the BOM. Nephi in II Nephi 30 is talking about 2 kind of people, the gentiles and Jews. The word Jews is used in a broader sense and meaning the entire House of Israel

  • The Nave's topical Bible confirms this context to the word "Jews":

    "After the dissolution of the kingdom of Israel the name was applied to all Israelites, as well as to those of the two remaining tribes"

    Jod is loved by the Antis lool You couldn't resist to quote it. But if you really read it you will see Lamanites and the jews are shown as 2 different people but with a common ground (the house of Israel).

    Just an advice before you copying stuff from your anti books you better read it first.

  • There's nothing terrible about the Mormon Church. For me is more terrible people who have a way of life saying bad things about the the CoJCoLDS and gaining money with it. They don't follow the scripture (eph 4:29-32) and they called themselves Christians. They called their intolerance work as some kind of missionary work but if we check the Bible we never saw Christ criticizing other religions on contrary we see him saying: (continues)

  • (continuation) Saying, The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat:

    3 All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do; but do not ye after their works: for they say, and do not. (Mathew 23:2-3)

    Anti cult ministers are not doing missionary work they are preaching hate. No wonder ADL and other civil righs organizations have been criticizing this kind of crimes

  • plastic pretty people parading phalsly

  • Why don't you answer the accusation instead of resorting to ad hom attacks? Your Church bears no resemblence to the historical church of Jesus Christ.

  • Answer the accusation?! HA ha -That would require HONOR.. You'll find none of that in omiolo or the Mormon church.

    No one lies more about mormons than mormons.

  • the fail is strong with omiolo. yes it is.

  • lying about the mormon church when HE'S READING YOUR OWN BOOKS BACK TO YOU WORD FOR WORD!

  • Omi,

    Are you still lying and saying Joe Smith was not a polygamist?

    I have shown you on the LDS website Joe Smith had many wives. Are you going to admit the truth now? Or are you going to continue to demonstrate you will lie and expose yourself as a poser?

  • oh don't forget that Some of Joe's wives were already married when he took them as wives. That little bit i'll never forget.

  • 33+ to be more exact, I was LDS 18 years all of the stuff shawn mccranee talks about is 99% accurate which is more than I can say for the LDS church who changes constantly with timexs

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more