There is a quick simple solution to global warming and climate change. It is called Muon Catalysed Fusion. As worked on Star Scientific. NO CO2. NO Greenhouse Gases. NO Toxic Waste. The source is dueterium from the World's Oceans - virtually limitless. It is cheap to produce. WE NEED IT NOW. See the website "Star Scientific Limited", Blog "The Big Picture by Andrew Horvath", Youtube video - "In the Footsteps of Fusion"
Whilst I welcome a more efficient fuel cell, in this video they come across as overselling it, for example as part of a solar storage system, why is better than a flow-battery? They need to explain, not just make statements, that said I welcome their work and hope it is implemented in products soon.
fuel cells, the last I heard, were inefficient and expensive in comparison with batteries -- and batteries themselves are generally too expensive to use in most large-scale aplications. The most efficient way to store energy? Pump water uphill!
@crescentrv Are we then not limited by the availability of suitable sites (not to mention environmental impact of damns...). Surely fuel cells or batteries gives us far more flexibility in locating the storage where the electricity is being produced or where it's needed. Agree about costs though- a viable solution has got to be efficient and cost effective.
@DrSnicklefritz@crescentrv Fuel cells and batteries can't exactly be compared as fuel cells produce power and batteries store power. To store power in terms of hydrogen, as David King here suggests is still a highly impractical solution today as hydrogen is a very light gas, you need a mammoth space to store it + its hazardous/risky. If you compress it and then store it, well then you will again need energy to do so, beating the whole purpose. The industry has yet to solve this problem!
This has been flagged as spam show
There is a quick simple solution to global warming and climate change. It is called Muon Catalysed Fusion. As worked on Star Scientific. NO CO2. NO Greenhouse Gases. NO Toxic Waste. The source is dueterium from the World's Oceans - virtually limitless. It is cheap to produce. WE NEED IT NOW. See the website "Star Scientific Limited", Blog "The Big Picture by Andrew Horvath", Youtube video - "In the Footsteps of Fusion"
2110kop 7 months ago
ESTOY DESARROLLANDO UNA INVESTIGASION MUY COMPLETA SOBRE LAS AFC
dakaha1 1 year ago
Whilst I welcome a more efficient fuel cell, in this video they come across as overselling it, for example as part of a solar storage system, why is better than a flow-battery? They need to explain, not just make statements, that said I welcome their work and hope it is implemented in products soon.
backacheache 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free Energy is real and its here but the coverup is strong, if you are interested in a REAL free energy machine then
just search for the LT MAGNET MOTOR in the youtube video search , it is probably the ONLY working magnet
motor out there. Join the free energy revolution!!
perplexfraction 1 year ago
We shouldn't have to pay for our energy, str8 up!
Sainter 1 year ago
fuel cells, the last I heard, were inefficient and expensive in comparison with batteries -- and batteries themselves are generally too expensive to use in most large-scale aplications. The most efficient way to store energy? Pump water uphill!
crescentrv 1 year ago
@crescentrv Are we then not limited by the availability of suitable sites (not to mention environmental impact of damns...). Surely fuel cells or batteries gives us far more flexibility in locating the storage where the electricity is being produced or where it's needed. Agree about costs though- a viable solution has got to be efficient and cost effective.
DrSnicklefritz 1 year ago
@DrSnicklefritz @crescentrv Fuel cells and batteries can't exactly be compared as fuel cells produce power and batteries store power. To store power in terms of hydrogen, as David King here suggests is still a highly impractical solution today as hydrogen is a very light gas, you need a mammoth space to store it + its hazardous/risky. If you compress it and then store it, well then you will again need energy to do so, beating the whole purpose. The industry has yet to solve this problem!
ajain111 1 year ago
I think this technology is great, why isn't this being used already!? We need to get off our backs, stop talking about it and put this into action :)
MegaGreenGoddess 1 year ago