In Fox news world,anything that questions America or challeges it is "far-left" and any person who doesn't get on there knees for Bush are "Bush-haters", it's funny because he's never once called Beck, Coulter,Rove or any of the other idiots "Obama-haters" or "Far-right loons" despite the constant bashing and lies they say about Obama.
What I think BA should've done here was to impress upon BOR the nature of the class (i.e. as one intending to teach students about the deconstruction of political discourse), and stress that he would be happy to apply the same methodology to the rhetoric of a "leftie" (Carter, say). Thereby, he could've presented his own inscription of the quasi-foundationalist quality of "balance". Not that is anything other than set-piece bullshit; but it might've been discoursively interesting to try that.
That would have been easily countered by, "But you don't have that in your curriculum."
I understand that the political ideologies espoused by the books aren't neccessarily relevant, but you have to admit it's a bit coincidental that every single one of them is leftist in nature.
@LivesUnderABridge No, that misses the point. The whole idea about "balancing" the module's bibliography presumes that the intent of the class is substantive/normative. How does one "balance" texts which intend to give students tools for deconstructing political discourse? With books that argue against deconstructing political discourse because, cyuh, it's all just obviously transparent?
BA *does* "have that in [his] curriculum", if "that" is a methodology for deconstructing leftist discourse.
@LivesUnderABridge Anyway, depending upon your definition of "leftist" (and considering what BOR's definition almost certainly *is*), it's probably the case that most worthwhile books about political deconstruction are written by "leftist" authors.
Which unabashed "conservative"/"right-wing"/whatever scholars would you like to see BA teach? Most right-wing academics are hostile to deconstruction in the first place, since they associate it with the bogey of "postmodernism".
@LivesUnderABridge And, thirdly, who the fuck cares about the argumentative/linguistic abuses committed by the "left" as *Andrews* probably thinks of it (Trotskyists, etc.)? Such people have absolutely no power in America. It would be an exercise in masturbation.
I have this prof. at fordham and though i agree with the fact that students should be able to see both sides.. not just pro-capitalist point of view.. Andrews seriously does not offer any other point of view besides his own. everything we read is very very liberal.. and as someone who considers herself liberal... i think its weird that i feel like i am not getting an unbiased account of the government through this class.
Bill says a liberal ideal is anti-American which means only conservative mindset is correct. The Irony of the matter is that Billo the clown is teaching one world view. If he is so against being closed minded perhaps he should try not being so closed minded. Love ya billo you're my sunshine ^_^
"liberal ideal is anti-American which means only conservative mindset is correct."
Love ya mate Prototalos you just made my day with that fine piece of bullshit reasoning. (Signed, with much love, your friendly neighbour across the pond)
When OReilly comes on, I switch to Fox BUSINESS News and watch Judge Andrew Napolitano on "Freedom Watch." I get the news of the day and learn about the Constitution! What a deal!
Pro capitalist... equates to fair and balanced. Because yes, socialists and communists are just lunatics, and the far left can't be trusted! Oh, sorry, I forgot about the far right! Ha ha! Silly me.
The whole purpose of academic studies is to evoke thought and debate about current issues. Bill accuses him of preaching anti-American rhetoric then dismisses his explanation. How is it anti-American to discuss and analyze topics related to the government? I'm sure the students are asked to research the claims made in the book and form their own conclusions.
He's not really worth getting angry over, he's just a psychologically 'ill O'reilly. PROJECTION is the name of his perverted game. Normal people's minds get muddled when trying to communicate with someone suffering 'ills disorder. You can tell Mr. Andrews is wondering why he agreed to go on a 'show' hosted by a child.
Bill is so infuriating. He is overwhelmingly disrespectful to his guests and cuts them off when they are successfully refuting his points. This shows how much of a joke FoxNews is to allow this to go on.
You're right.. He hates liberals, is pro-war, a racist, have no mercy for other countries etc.. I've studied something very similar to this, and O'Reilly have no clue what it is about.
O'Reilly is just pissed because there are no republican books in the recuired reading..
mind your own business billo... your not even in the class so keep your nose out of it. you wouldnt have said anything if all the required texts were conservative bias.
Required Reading doesn't mean Required Thinking.....Think for yourselves, people.
Also, the Zapruder film does show a Secret Service agent turning around and aiming something at JFK right before he bolts back from being shot by whoever.
I was actually in his class when this interview happened. He showed it in class and it was overall fun times. In any case, yeah, Bill takes this quite out of context. I don't think either of them do very well in this interview.
Mainstream-media in USA is frightening propaganda. The fact is that O´reilly uses the word "unamerican" is despicable, and when you come to think of it, the only countries who uses that kind of nationalism is totalarian states like the soviet union did etc. I feel sorry for americans being brainwashed every day and haven´t learned to think for theirself.
would all of you leftists please move to Canada like you promised. This nutcase prof is an assclown. The scary thing is our universities are full of these moonbats. Luckily most college students return to reality when they hit 30. If they didnt this country would be in some serious shit
Bill O'Reilly gets on my mantits. I think people should spend a lot less time uploading this twat. The less we see of this closet Satanist, the better. He is infecting the minds of all mentally challenged people everywhere. Obviously they are too dense to see it. The less we add to this loser's cause the better. Boycott his show and write for his dismissal from the air. Take a stand and fight for your god given rights America.
It doesn't matter what school Bill went to...he plainly does not understand the purpose of the course (or of critical thinking for that matter) and has just invited his guest on to portray him as anti-american...the world cannot be neatly divided into the "conservative"/"secular-procresive" world view he has conjured up in his mind and now in his book
Sorry I don't care how many colleges Bill went to; it doesn't seem like Bill can hang with Bruce at all. Bill looks intelligent when he's taking on Letterman or other opinionated, but uninformed guess, but against a true intellectual the roles are reversed; Bill just gets emotional and loud.
Setting him up against a professor is just too much. This whole interview is a testiment to Bill's problem: He's so anti-everything he doesn't agree with, he won't even let other people make up thier own mind about something. Ok Bill, we understand that you're so narrow minded not a even needle would get through, but don't push it on others. These "kids" you talk about have problably read more on other cultures, political ideas and theories than you ever had and will.
Jeezzzz, This guy owns Oreilly without even trying. Since when does history have to be viewed thru the lense of either GOOD OR BAD??? At the collegiate level students need classes that helps them understand and evaulates political or economic systems. According to Orielly, students need to be taught how as well as what to think. THAT SHOULDN'T BE THE PURPOSE OF ANY COLLEGE CLASS!!!!!!!!
Oreily is an idiot, look at his expression 1:10, he is an ignorant idiot. He has not clue wat so ever about politics or economics etc... He just read from his notes and yell hust up, thats it. Ignorant bastard.
Bruce Andrews is good on here - this so-called anti-Americanism sounds like the Nazis' "anti-German" or more recently the expression and actions in the 1950s of the McCarthy era. Andrews doesn't even agree with Scheer! He is a poet and politics professor who has written some funny and innovatve poetry (see Language Poets). He is trying to make people think. The US (I'm from NZ) needs people like him - left wing or not.
o'reilly's a fag. putting words in people's mouths is not journalism. What's he aftaid of? Free speech? you would think he would support free speech, since he makes his living on bullshit.
Why this man thinks that we should stick our fingers in our ears and scream "lalalalalalwe are the best lalalalaalal" and not actually evaluate susbsantive evidence is beyond me. maybe its because when people think, O'reilly's BS becomes painful, and people stop listening
youtube is full of fail liberals
doudoub2005 8 months ago
take your "america is perfect" glasses of Bill...you are not helping us
Rorix9 11 months ago
In Fox news world,anything that questions America or challeges it is "far-left" and any person who doesn't get on there knees for Bush are "Bush-haters", it's funny because he's never once called Beck, Coulter,Rove or any of the other idiots "Obama-haters" or "Far-right loons" despite the constant bashing and lies they say about Obama.
TheDalinkwent 1 year ago
What I think BA should've done here was to impress upon BOR the nature of the class (i.e. as one intending to teach students about the deconstruction of political discourse), and stress that he would be happy to apply the same methodology to the rhetoric of a "leftie" (Carter, say). Thereby, he could've presented his own inscription of the quasi-foundationalist quality of "balance". Not that is anything other than set-piece bullshit; but it might've been discoursively interesting to try that.
isitme88 1 year ago
@isitme88
That would have been easily countered by, "But you don't have that in your curriculum."
I understand that the political ideologies espoused by the books aren't neccessarily relevant, but you have to admit it's a bit coincidental that every single one of them is leftist in nature.
LivesUnderABridge 1 year ago
@LivesUnderABridge No, that misses the point. The whole idea about "balancing" the module's bibliography presumes that the intent of the class is substantive/normative. How does one "balance" texts which intend to give students tools for deconstructing political discourse? With books that argue against deconstructing political discourse because, cyuh, it's all just obviously transparent?
BA *does* "have that in [his] curriculum", if "that" is a methodology for deconstructing leftist discourse.
isitme88 1 year ago
@LivesUnderABridge Anyway, depending upon your definition of "leftist" (and considering what BOR's definition almost certainly *is*), it's probably the case that most worthwhile books about political deconstruction are written by "leftist" authors.
Which unabashed "conservative"/"right-wing"/whatever scholars would you like to see BA teach? Most right-wing academics are hostile to deconstruction in the first place, since they associate it with the bogey of "postmodernism".
isitme88 1 year ago
@LivesUnderABridge And, thirdly, who the fuck cares about the argumentative/linguistic abuses committed by the "left" as *Andrews* probably thinks of it (Trotskyists, etc.)? Such people have absolutely no power in America. It would be an exercise in masturbation.
isitme88 1 year ago
I hate Bill...but I gotta say that yeah the book is kinda inappropriate as required reading.
dtran29 1 year ago
I have this prof. at fordham and though i agree with the fact that students should be able to see both sides.. not just pro-capitalist point of view.. Andrews seriously does not offer any other point of view besides his own. everything we read is very very liberal.. and as someone who considers herself liberal... i think its weird that i feel like i am not getting an unbiased account of the government through this class.
can0lliii 2 years ago
Lemme guess, your Italian?
mongol311 2 years ago
@mongol311 no fordham is in america and i am not of italian descent
can0lliii 1 year ago
i love how people bash on the succesfull guy, but never mention the flaws of other people (cmon thumb me down)
baconstory 2 years ago
@baconstory No thumbs down in 6 months. I say you fail :)
Uhndrash 1 year ago
Would have been more fun if they made O'Reilly read some of Andrews' poetry :)
simpelesoul 2 years ago
Bill says a liberal ideal is anti-American which means only conservative mindset is correct. The Irony of the matter is that Billo the clown is teaching one world view. If he is so against being closed minded perhaps he should try not being so closed minded. Love ya billo you're my sunshine ^_^
Prototalos 2 years ago 2
"liberal ideal is anti-American which means only conservative mindset is correct."
Love ya mate Prototalos you just made my day with that fine piece of bullshit reasoning. (Signed, with much love, your friendly neighbour across the pond)
Rocketeer1001 2 years ago
What the hell does "why does a government do something" have anything to do with left or right?
Isnt that a "how" question?
truemonolith 2 years ago 2
Its incredible that such a jack ass like Bill o Reilly is allowed to waste airwave time.
geeoogle 2 years ago
Isn't it hilarious though?
brockjarrett789 2 years ago
jcbydwi you are the problem with this country....you are so unintelligent and moronic its unspeakable
Oreillyisthebest 2 years ago
O'Reilly is an idiot.
jcbydwi 2 years ago 3
O'Reilly completely missed the point of the class and then continued on his misguided course until he looked like a complete fool!!!
zephyrboys 2 years ago 6
This has been flagged as spam show
When OReilly comes on, I switch to Fox BUSINESS News and watch Judge Andrew Napolitano on "Freedom Watch." I get the news of the day and learn about the Constitution! What a deal!
vechorik 3 months ago
thats my professor :)
chrisbear77 3 years ago
you are so lucky I would love to be in that class!
Prototalos 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
another far left loon teaching our students to hate america
Dovey4424 3 years ago
Pro capitalist... equates to fair and balanced. Because yes, socialists and communists are just lunatics, and the far left can't be trusted! Oh, sorry, I forgot about the far right! Ha ha! Silly me.
BassVirtual 3 years ago
Boy is this guy a nutjob!
rjl2000 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
nerds bill o reilly won dis arguments everyone jus mad cuz they hate bush but bush is decent president
imagoodkid69 3 years ago
The whole purpose of academic studies is to evoke thought and debate about current issues. Bill accuses him of preaching anti-American rhetoric then dismisses his explanation. How is it anti-American to discuss and analyze topics related to the government? I'm sure the students are asked to research the claims made in the book and form their own conclusions.
bobdiver7 3 years ago
He's not really worth getting angry over, he's just a psychologically 'ill O'reilly. PROJECTION is the name of his perverted game. Normal people's minds get muddled when trying to communicate with someone suffering 'ills disorder. You can tell Mr. Andrews is wondering why he agreed to go on a 'show' hosted by a child.
TeleCumber 3 years ago 2
Bill is so infuriating. He is overwhelmingly disrespectful to his guests and cuts them off when they are successfully refuting his points. This shows how much of a joke FoxNews is to allow this to go on.
aibrean00 3 years ago 5
here is what one of your former students said, bruce andrews"
lol is billo dyslexic or just plain stupid to read?
BAYYtalibanGOhard 3 years ago
How many times does O'reilly say left and liberal durring his show. He's beginning to sound like a Nazi.
jrmsher33 4 years ago 4
You're right.. He hates liberals, is pro-war, a racist, have no mercy for other countries etc.. I've studied something very similar to this, and O'Reilly have no clue what it is about.
O'Reilly is just pissed because there are no republican books in the recuired reading..
aurorablind 3 years ago
mind your own business billo... your not even in the class so keep your nose out of it. you wouldnt have said anything if all the required texts were conservative bias.
BAYYtalibanGOhard 4 years ago 3
Ah, he so eloquent.
steppsteph 4 years ago
Down with o'reily- a human devil among many others.
babylonsfalling 4 years ago
there goes billO trying to use character assasination to make his point. tell tale signs of a corporate cock sucker.
digitalslavery 4 years ago 2
Required Reading doesn't mean Required Thinking.....Think for yourselves, people.
Also, the Zapruder film does show a Secret Service agent turning around and aiming something at JFK right before he bolts back from being shot by whoever.
spartydrew5 4 years ago
Am I missing something? The point of the class is how governments weasel out of trouble, right? How is that being one-sided?
serialclone 4 years ago
I was actually in his class when this interview happened. He showed it in class and it was overall fun times. In any case, yeah, Bill takes this quite out of context. I don't think either of them do very well in this interview.
smiledammit24 4 years ago
Yeah it's a good thing we live in America isn't it? And retards like you aren't in charge. Wait a minute....
amdonov 4 years ago
I think the students also have the right to disagree with whats in the book don't they?
exdoode 4 years ago
damn right
Drummur 4 years ago
oh, and the mainstream media can suck my dick too.
Drummur 4 years ago
Mainstream-media in USA is frightening propaganda. The fact is that O´reilly uses the word "unamerican" is despicable, and when you come to think of it, the only countries who uses that kind of nationalism is totalarian states like the soviet union did etc. I feel sorry for americans being brainwashed every day and haven´t learned to think for theirself.
appof 4 years ago
To anyone who actually respects Bill, I pity you. Screw Bush, screw Bill, and screw all the government corruption.
Drummur 4 years ago
first of all childrenofkornf9 you are a tool.
second the spin runs deep in this interview.
Mattspeakstruth911 4 years ago
would all of you leftists please move to Canada like you promised. This nutcase prof is an assclown. The scary thing is our universities are full of these moonbats. Luckily most college students return to reality when they hit 30. If they didnt this country would be in some serious shit
bohemond4 4 years ago
Glad the leftists control the congress and the money. Soon we will control the Presidency, and you will get even more angry.
bobc1002 4 years ago
Facts aren't "fair and balanced" just like Fox News.
overmind25 4 years ago
Bill O'Reilly gets on my mantits. I think people should spend a lot less time uploading this twat. The less we see of this closet Satanist, the better. He is infecting the minds of all mentally challenged people everywhere. Obviously they are too dense to see it. The less we add to this loser's cause the better. Boycott his show and write for his dismissal from the air. Take a stand and fight for your god given rights America.
TheFocGroup 4 years ago
It doesn't matter what school Bill went to...he plainly does not understand the purpose of the course (or of critical thinking for that matter) and has just invited his guest on to portray him as anti-american...the world cannot be neatly divided into the "conservative"/"secular-procresive" world view he has conjured up in his mind and now in his book
9Rolex9 4 years ago
This is so funny because Bill has abosolutely no iea what this guys class is about, even though the guy is just plainly telling him.
damdarch 4 years ago
Sorry I don't care how many colleges Bill went to; it doesn't seem like Bill can hang with Bruce at all. Bill looks intelligent when he's taking on Letterman or other opinionated, but uninformed guess, but against a true intellectual the roles are reversed; Bill just gets emotional and loud.
drnoj1 4 years ago
hey zlimness shit, Bill went to multiple colleges, Harvard being one of them. Yeah I bet these kids at Fordham University are smarter than him.
patej830 4 years ago
i would love to see Bill get fucked by two huge black guys at the same time.
yying2 4 years ago
Setting him up against a professor is just too much. This whole interview is a testiment to Bill's problem: He's so anti-everything he doesn't agree with, he won't even let other people make up thier own mind about something. Ok Bill, we understand that you're so narrow minded not a even needle would get through, but don't push it on others. These "kids" you talk about have problably read more on other cultures, political ideas and theories than you ever had and will.
zlimness 4 years ago
George W Bush is the Real War Criminal, He is just another Hitler Wannabe Dictator, set on taking over the world one Oil rich country at a time....
bostonbruins4 4 years ago
Jeezzzz, This guy owns Oreilly without even trying. Since when does history have to be viewed thru the lense of either GOOD OR BAD??? At the collegiate level students need classes that helps them understand and evaulates political or economic systems. According to Orielly, students need to be taught how as well as what to think. THAT SHOULDN'T BE THE PURPOSE OF ANY COLLEGE CLASS!!!!!!!!
KushKing99 4 years ago
bitch o'reilly
scarecrowmex 4 years ago
since when is Anti Bush, anti american????
Questioning is American.
wookieproductions 4 years ago
SOMEONE GETS IT
mossytreehead 4 years ago
i hate bill.
i hate bill oreilly
i hate you bill.youre a piece of shit.
rangeroverlover 4 years ago
telling truth, divirge fom script bad, capitalism gooooood
billoreilly hes a macarthy with a lower Iq
capelipl 4 years ago
Oreily is an idiot, look at his expression 1:10, he is an ignorant idiot. He has not clue wat so ever about politics or economics etc... He just read from his notes and yell hust up, thats it. Ignorant bastard.
swingbabu2006 4 years ago
that was hilarious, bill o'rielly is a huge blubbering vagina.
aqaspecification 4 years ago
fuck all you guys
god bless you o'reilly
lokidafool 4 years ago
Bruce Andrews is good on here - this so-called anti-Americanism sounds like the Nazis' "anti-German" or more recently the expression and actions in the 1950s of the McCarthy era. Andrews doesn't even agree with Scheer! He is a poet and politics professor who has written some funny and innovatve poetry (see Language Poets). He is trying to make people think. The US (I'm from NZ) needs people like him - left wing or not.
quagapp 4 years ago
o'reilly's a fag. putting words in people's mouths is not journalism. What's he aftaid of? Free speech? you would think he would support free speech, since he makes his living on bullshit.
hiimbrady 4 years ago
Anti-Bush doesn't mean anti-America. Infact, anti-Bush, is more pro-America than being pro-Bush!
darrentom 5 years ago
haha O'Reily is such a tard. I cant belive Fox is still saying anyone who is against Bush is anti-american. Didnt that stop working years ago?
BigCatR 5 years ago
Bruce Andrews is a scumbag. He is an insult to the left, and a fitting nemesis for a goon like O'Reilly.
AlexMarkey 5 years ago
"what's the course about?" "it's about, seems to me, America's Bad."
ROFL!!!! does bill even fucking listen to himself?
blrn 5 years ago
woooo hooooo, go Bruce! Thats my Politics prof. right there!
sublime1398 5 years ago
who is this tedious guy o'reilly? he's an idiot.
eyeballhatred 5 years ago
Why this man thinks that we should stick our fingers in our ears and scream "lalalalalalwe are the best lalalalaalal" and not actually evaluate susbsantive evidence is beyond me. maybe its because when people think, O'reilly's BS becomes painful, and people stop listening
lorescribe 5 years ago