Thus, the main pollutants meet are: sulfur dioxide, fluorine derivatives, nitrogen oxides, ozone and many other substances produced by different industries as hydrochloric acid, particulates, carbon monoxide. They limit the photosynthetic active leaf area.
Various tree plantings, hedges or woodlands will play a large physical dispersion of pollutants, changing the natural roughness of the soil, causing changes in local humidity and temperature, all favoring better dispersing or fixing the ground of various pollutants emitted in the atmosphere. This implies first of all, knowledge of the mechanisms of plant poisoning of air pollutants, to then be able to imagine a way to mitigate the effects, or a selection of resistant species.
Polar bears need ice to survive, is hunting for seals, no ice = no seal = no food = starvation = extinction (ps: polar bears can not hunt in water)
It is perhaps appropriate to recall that the role of the ambient air scrubber, the plant is attributed to limited however, so it is illusory to believe that the oxygen produced by a forest can compensate for that consumed by the jets taking off from an airfield. In turn, the physical plant is more important.
How can CO2 be a poisonous gas if plants need it to survive? Photosynthesis anyone? "Climate Change" is a fraud. Respond to this comment asking for proof and I will provide you with irrefutable evidence.
P.S. Polar bears can swim and are NOT endangered! In fact, their population has increased by 25% or so in the last 10 years!
Thus, the main pollutants meet are: sulfur dioxide, fluorine derivatives, nitrogen oxides, ozone and many other substances produced by different industries as hydrochloric acid, particulates, carbon monoxide. They limit the photosynthetic active leaf area.
daydanos 1 year ago
Various tree plantings, hedges or woodlands will play a large physical dispersion of pollutants, changing the natural roughness of the soil, causing changes in local humidity and temperature, all favoring better dispersing or fixing the ground of various pollutants emitted in the atmosphere. This implies first of all, knowledge of the mechanisms of plant poisoning of air pollutants, to then be able to imagine a way to mitigate the effects, or a selection of resistant species.
daydanos 1 year ago
Polar bears need ice to survive, is hunting for seals, no ice = no seal = no food = starvation = extinction (ps: polar bears can not hunt in water)
It is perhaps appropriate to recall that the role of the ambient air scrubber, the plant is attributed to limited however, so it is illusory to believe that the oxygen produced by a forest can compensate for that consumed by the jets taking off from an airfield. In turn, the physical plant is more important.
daydanos 1 year ago
How can CO2 be a poisonous gas if plants need it to survive? Photosynthesis anyone? "Climate Change" is a fraud. Respond to this comment asking for proof and I will provide you with irrefutable evidence.
P.S. Polar bears can swim and are NOT endangered! In fact, their population has increased by 25% or so in the last 10 years!
cjm720 1 year ago