Russian Heavy Artillery MSTA-B Военное дело МСТА Б

[mikero1369]

anyone notice Russians of the Caribbean?

[kueto666]

i agree.... i guess?

[papandosik]

@Saxe333

they serve as basic aiming assistance, perhaps its practice targeting, then soldiers will get the feeling of aiming (easier for them if officer is not around.)

or if they need to fire and cover large area (target) each system (cannon) fire at its own angle.

[Saxe333]

Does anyone know the purpose of the wooden frame through which the guns fire?

[777sable]

it says, that this weapon can be used with projectile with small nuclear charge

[matterenown]

obviasley i know more than you and archer outclass MSTA-S in allmost eveything archer has better range with 50 km vs 36 km its lighter, faster, needs less crew, fire bigger rounds, can fire in a higher angle, so archer wins in almost everything so shutt upp. SWEDEN WIN AGAIN

[Militarija]

@matterenown In fact archer is far otperformed in terms of crossroad capabilites by MSTA S tank platform, and your maximum range compare is kinda wrong, in fact MSTA S can use rocket assisted rounds that can hit targets up to 48km away. Then there is price...Archer it far more expencive in start then MSTA complex, i prefer to have 2 MSTA then 1 Archer. Then there is other problem, how much Archers is out there? And then the last thing...MSTA is 20+ years old...

[matterenown]

@Militarija 48 km vs 50 sweden win more expensiv maby, but sweden got money quality befor quantity and yes it is 20 years old but still it is outclassed by the new artellerypeases. and we are not talking about rockets her...

[joebryer]

is there any one else that thinks that the flag combo on the desk is a bit odd... The flags of Sweden, Finland, China, and USA...i live in Sweden and it dont make any sens :P

[matterenown]

stone age artillery...

[bittemeinrammstein]

@matterenown - Stone age artillery who fire precision rounds Krasnopol? Who fire laser guided ammunitons, who fire rocket assestance rounds? Opposed to M198 who USA use or Archer from your country who you only have 24? You compare it with Archer? Archer is not even same class as this weapon... compare MSTA-S for that. Learn weapons before you speak.

[Musfl]

Russia sucks,yeah!

[Streiktiel]

@Musfl you suck

[matterenown]

YES FUCK USA AND RUSSIA IM FROM SWEDEN RETARD

[Ahamster1]

@matterenown dude relax c'mon lol

[DaSurot]

this was a 1987 artillery I bet they've got something more way better than this now today.

[NUcpl11]

US Marines.......M777A2....Fielde­d since 2005

155m towed Howitzer.....crew 6

95-110lbs rounds.....50m kill radius 100m casualty

Range 18.6 miles

towed to firing in 3 min

digital firing system...accurate to .01mill

can fire mine laying, grenade laying, illumination, gas, HE, rocket, and guided rounds

I know this because its my job

Romeo Battery best in the Corps

[matterenown]

@NUcpl11 but still sweden winns with archer bofors, 155 mm, crew 2 and 50 km range

[maxgrbesa]

Russian  weapons.set a standard in modern artillery,and modern warfare

[Unit987654321]

This thing has controllable shells that have a 90% hit ratio.

[keldn]

Ааа сцуко "повышенная мобильность, 8 человек могут..." ыыы

после ролика Archer-а хочется ржать )))

[matterenown]

FUCK RUSSIA

[Rustanly]

@matterenown FUCK USA, and for YOU

[inferno1708]

@matterenown Respect only the strong! And the weak shout from for a corner only!

[daniyar331313]

Метелалом!

У американцев самое лучшее!

[Rustanly]

@daniyar331313 Сосо детка

[elgorro1970]

the Russian Helmets looks like eggs ;-))

[Boombastik87]

Куда пропала эта ОЧЕНЬ ХОРОШАЯ и позновательная передача?

Американцы - сосать бля - сами переводите! Не для вас пендосов это делалось! =)

[vintagesurvivor]

Looks very similar to US M198. All the bickering over whose gun is best is silly. I was M110 8" SP gun, great artillery piece...accurate, great range, many types of shells, etc. However, I do have great respect for our Russian (at the time I was in Army, Soviet) counterparts. Their guns were no less accurate, and thier crews no less dedicated to the mission. After all we're ALL artillerymen, a brotherhood of sorts. Lets be grateful we never fired these things in anger at each other...

[grrisssa]

american army dislikes this.

[olsku360]

nice finnish flag :)

[DSpirith]

@robroy904

Hey bitch, how about a nice big cup of stfu?

"Ne pokupayte russkoe oruzhie" - Dude, like 1/3 of the world uses our weapons. Now gtfo.

[Anfariuss]

@robroy904 lol... do not buy? lol all YtUb viewers buy weapons like this...

stupid chechens or gay georgian internet fighters from britain

[RatedRsupeRme]

Can anyone translate, i would like to know why there is Swedish, Finnish & US flags too =)

[olsku360]

@RatedRsupeRme veikkaan että sen takii koska ollaan "pääkohteita" hehehe :D

[InfernalThunder]

compare this garbage to 777

[aviomaster]

CCCP should have destroyed USA long time ago . we would be having these problems in the world today.

[559x831]

@aviomaster r u kidding me we all had and have our sights on the middle east

all super powers do lol

[nedeljko031]

Is that "black pearl theme" from Pirates of the carribean :D?

[ImWatchinTheTube]

This video really makes me wish I could speak Russian, as I do not I'm really just in it for the big boomers, lol makes me feel retarded.

[InRUSSIAweTRUST]

wow, nearly a man can climb in these barrels

[renea222]

nice video.

[Raonisk]

sistemu probliema

[borderpatrol05]

damn, upto 7 rounds per minute

[nedeljko031]

in fact theoreticaly it can fire even 9 per minute....but realy it can fire 8....

[nedeljko031]

it depends on crew xD i saw crew firing 10 155mm rounds for one minute....but next minute it was 6 xD

[dgcrew]

@nedeljko031 Exactly. It doesn't only depends in the type of artillery, it also depends on the crew. That's why if I had an artillery crew I would be sure that the ones that I have to kill are killed. For the motherland, RUSSIA!

[nedeljko031]

@dgcrew Mother Russia ;))))

[559x831]

@nedeljko031 yep thats why technology is the great equalizer haha USA rocks shit

DEMOCRATIC COUNTRYS ROCK THE WESTERN WORLD BITCHES

[nedeljko031]

@559x831 MSTA is fully automated...so....go shit somewhere else....

[559x831]

@nedeljko031 no it int if so why do i see a ramrod and ppl loading the charge?

not like many advanced and western guns but dont get me wrong russia and the ussr

are a power to behold but why do ppl say that their old shit is great its not i mean for

the time being it was but now the only russian militera i see of value is T-80s and

and newer AKs and their trucks

[nedeljko031]

@559x831 MSTA C is fully automated, MSTA B is thowed field howtizer....and its crew operated as almost every howtizer of that kind. Self propelled howtizers are automated and you can see that MSTA C is automated as every Western counterpart. And ššššššš dont talk me about Crusader or similar systems....wait....Koalistia is also there....

[nedeljko031]

@559x831 AK....is God of battlefield, russian trucks...are ubreakable....and T80 is quality factor in amored forces of Russia and i dont see why T80 is obsolete....

[559x831]

@nedeljko031 its not just outclassed by western designs i wouldnt say the AK is

god but it oblivously works and is a good weapon but its to old needs to be updated

[nedeljko031]

@559x831 I think you are wrong son...i served 20 years in army...artilery cannot be outclassed... Ever heard for AK74, AK101, AK103, AK107, AK 108.....?

[559x831]

@nedeljko031 REALY what where you and nation and you did you serve under?

and artilery out classed simply but the newer aks dont come close to the greatness

of which the ak47 has

[nedeljko031]

@559x831 1. I think that you never saw AK in your life....or you saw chinese one 2. I served in PVO (KUB M1 and P15 Flat Face sighting radar, after that for years in Electronic Jamming and Electronic Warfare forces and at last in artilery command site as communication and IT officer) 3. Howtizer is Howtizer same 50 years ago and now...there are no extraodinary changes in that part of equpment, in radar and rocket tech yeah. in artilery...NO

[559x831]

@nedeljko031 right i spent 5 years in the army 2 in korea and 3 one year rotations in

iraq and in artilery yes the tech has changed idk what country you fought for but artilery

has changed like the U.S. paladin is fully automated all you have to do is hit 3 buttons

and boom 15 ppl dead a hadji assualt force stopped lol but if you ask what i know your gonna ask 89th MP BDG

[nedeljko031]

@559x831 in artilery i served as officer on Nora A (towed 152mm howtizer from 1996-2000) later on NORA B52 (self propelled howtizer 2005-2009) google it....

[fcbcdl]

@559x831 this artillery could shoot nuclear heads for 24 km

[559x831]

@fcbcdl if u ask me the ableity to fire nuclear shells

is a plus no matter what lol that i will give them that !!

[GodwinCarpenter]

@nedeljko031 It kind of is in a head to head with most western tanks. However I believe that the Russian army is equipped as it would be for a large conflict. For example if USA and Russia had a war then the Russian would continue to manufacture and field T80's, the Americans though could not afford to build Abrahams on the scale that they would need to be built. The same goes for the Challenger, best tank in the world head to head but not cost effective.

[Istvan56]

The problem with towed artillery today is enemy radar connected to counter-battery fire. Towed artillery can't "shoot and scoot" effectively to avoid it. Up against rebels and other low tech forces it is more than adequate though. Notice the battery was firing together for greater effect - time on target is the same. More modern artillery can rapidly fire several shells on different arcs to all hit at the same moment increasing lethality.

[Sellos23]

ahhh man this is ownage

[Diemorder]

english version anyone?

[BitnikGr]

@Diemorder

/watch?v=R7KheIidOHY

[Diemorder]

thanks man

[vladimirrrkasi666]

@Diemorder i dont think there is any english versions of this)) well havent seen any russian tv show on english yet;))