Of the people on there, Mort is the one I agree with most. The final resolution will likely be the 1967 border with land swaps but that should not the starting point to begin negotiations. The principal for peace has been land for peace. Not give land and then negotiation for peace. The final resolution will be something close to the Clinton Parameters but that is not the starting point. That offer has expired and should not be the starting point so Palestinians can demand more now.
continued - The main problems with this is that moderates like Fayyad who may want to negotiate for sincere peaceful resolution do not have the publc backing of the Palestinians. The Palestinians are split between support of Hamas and Fatah. A leader that would be able to support a two state solution is questionable.
On the other side, Bibi may not be the one who will bring forward a peace proposal (unlike in 1947,1978,2000, 2008) that would even satisfy a moderate Pal leader
The United States does not believe what he is saying. Two states.
I think he is going to start backsliding and change his story concerning the 67 lines. (obama)
The women in the blue dress needs to stay home and bake cookies for her grandchildren. She calls Netanyahu weak???? How would you like to have his job???
The Israel area was a barren unused land prior to the Belfour Declaration. It is a well known fact that the Arabs encouraged their people to move there to occupy so that when the Jewish state went into effect, they would have established a population claim. Why are all those Arab refugees not being accepted back into Arab countries? Because it looks bad for Israel if they are looking like they have no where to go. "Cold Arabs" is the only reason those people have no home, not Israel. God knows!
@wayinoutreach I really shouldn't be responding to your comment, since it is so ridiculously false. Where in God's name are you getting your "facts". I guess you were gullible enough to believe that Palestine was "a land for a people, for a people without a land"? It doesn't take very much to debunk this myth. The Balfour Declaration, which was incorporated into the Mandate for Palestine provided for a homeland for the Jews in Palestine. Key word being...IN, not all of Palestine. Cont.>>>>>>.
@wayinoutreach The documents clearly acknowledge the presence of a indigenous non-Jewish population, i.e.Arab Palestinians. The document insisted that nothing should be done which might prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine. Direct quote.
@steute "insisted that nothing should be done which might prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine. Direct quote"
Right, & diplomatic language is not used to run to the meaning that if a single Arab insists that Islam must reign for 100% of the region, with no exception, that's not the extent that any diplomat or politician would accept, yet that's their interpretation. I'm sure the Islamic Imperialists appreciate your absolutist solidarity.
@steute "insisted that nothing should be done which might prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine. Direct quote"
In fact you've touched on the crux of the matter. They are insisting that any lack of dhimmitude violates that 'promise.' Please research dhimmi in Islam to understand precisely what they expect from Jews. If you still want to fight for the irony of "the right to take away rights" of Jews, then you'll rate even higher on the scale.
@steute "insisted that nothing should be done which might prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine. Direct quote"
Thanks for bringing that up. It's so much more powerful when YOU or THEY try to use it. Nobody would believe me saying that anyone thinks this way. I should pay you.
@steute2011 Go to mideast web .org & read it for yourself. It is in God's name that I get my facts. Israel was a nation before Palestine ever was. God gave the land & it's borders. The people that left did so of their own accord, & the land that was won in the 6 day war would never have been taken, had Israel not been attacked. The only thing holding back the Peace talks is the Palestinian/Hamasians unwillingness to say Israle has a RIGHT TO EXIST. WHY????
@wayinoutreach While I disagree with your version of the facts, I respect your position. Since you are looking at it mostly through religious belief and I am making a mostly legal argument, I do not believe there would ever be a common ground. So I agree to disagree.
Obama is setting up Israel for a fall. He knows that the 1967 borders are indefensible. Netanyahu is trying to keep Israel together, completely surrounded by 1 billion hostile Arabs or at least all the Arab leaders. why have the Arabs helped their brother Arabs? Necause they want the end of Israel!! Pple have a look at PMW
Can we get at least more than one competent leader in this world that cares about the lives of the Jewish people that isn't Netanyahu? And who is that woman calling him weak?! He's kept a cool head with organized attacks coming from all sides and Israel is still standing strong because they have those regions that GOD GAVE THEM BECAUSE THE PALESTINIANS WEREN'T FOLLOWING HIM. This is a total mess, it seems Truman didn't have an issue with letting them keep those regions, why is Obama ruining us?
@luettem Better hope so, because they are making enemies faster than they can keep up with. I can't imagine that God has anything to do with the way they are treating the Arab Palestinian people. It is always troubling to me when people use religion to justify illegal occupation, illegal settlements and human rights violations. I can't imagine what is so holy about that?
@steute2011 thats BS--another person who reads liberal propaganda....The only people hurting the palistinians are their fellow Arabs....you better find the truth, and you are a LONG way from it at this point. The Arabs teach Hate to their children from their first breath, how to become human bombs, and the only civilized people existing there is ISRAEL
@luettem My blind friend, all you need to do is look at the votes in the UN on the hundreds of resolutions passed against Israel to see that out of 192 nations, the vote is never less than 170 nations in favor, with only seven at most against and the rest abstain. Read some of the international condemnations of Israels actions. The international community is not very keen on nations that thumb there nose at international law /Norms and ignore the hundreds of UN Resolutions that have been passed.
@steute2011 "My blind friend, all you need to do is look at the votes in the UN"
You jackass. I just explained to you the Islamic conference, driven by religious bigotry, is used to attack Israel illegally & you buy it not because you didn't know about Islam, because you didn't care. You hate the same people as them. For you, that is all that counts. Grow up little girl! I am done with my patience, you are rude & ignorant not because of misfortune, but because you hate the inconvenient facts.
@constructivereconcil Hey dick cheese, unfortunately your math is not as good as your ability to spew garbage. Even if you took away the 57 Muslim Nations form the UNGA, you still have 135 nations, of which most always vote in favor of the resolutions against Israel. Even a large number of Israelis are against the illegal occupation and illegal settlements. I guess we are all stupid and you are the enlighten one. Stop trying to convince the world that Israel is doing nothing wrong and get a life
@steute2011 You're a real Machiavelli of the post-modern generation, a master at politician...great vocabulary too. I guess I shouldn't worry about anyone who has no problem with Islam being the only organized religion to manipulate the UN. In your imagination, the only thing that ever happens are voting sessions with no dialog before or after, just voting or not.
@steute2011 "Even a large number of Israelis are against the illegal occupation and illegal settlements"
Yes they are. There are liberal fools everywhere, and many who actually have to live among militants who threaten them. Nazis had lots of 'democratic' elections too, but you probably slept through that part of history.
Idiot. If you ever advance to adulthood, study the concepts of 'human rights' & "facts" in a democracy. Pure democracy itself does not actually give anyone any rights.
@steute2011 Moron, please study Nazism. They were elected in a democratic vote too. Dumbfucks don't learn from history after all. What lesson did you learn from the Nazis? Crazy white motherfuckers with short mustaches will never get elected, EVER again!
@constructivereconcil We can't all be as smart as you...Einstein! It's too bad your parents survived the Holocaust. NOW GET BACK UNDER YOUR ROCK COCKROACH!!!!
@steute "It's too bad your parents survived the Holocaust"
Not many gentiles in California were victims of the holocaust. I think none that I know of.
"NOW GET BACK UNDER YOUR ROCK COCKROACH"
You imagine yourself talking to insects? I hope you heal some day. Be well, & start thinking more about what you say FIRST, & there's less chance someone will feel compelled to correct you. It's not about you, jackass. I don't give a damn about your sensitive ego in comparison to spreading hateful lies.
So you care only about your fragile ego, but you can haul off and act condescending yourself? Hypocrisy in action. Go lick your wounds and if you learn to be nice, you might get more from conversations, that may even lead to your own personal growth rather than ending with you pouting petty insults.
"When the blind lead the blind..."
Germany 1920s, plenty of democracy there. Study the parallels before you pontificate about impressions you glean casually.
@luettem She doesn't care. I've been trying to explain to her, I encouraged her to look for the evidence rather than ranting loudly over headlines, but she got pissed when I explained the Islamic nations illegally working together to use religion as a political tool against Jews and eventually everyone else if we allow it.
Of the people on there, Mort is the one I agree with most. The final resolution will likely be the 1967 border with land swaps but that should not the starting point to begin negotiations. The principal for peace has been land for peace. Not give land and then negotiation for peace. The final resolution will be something close to the Clinton Parameters but that is not the starting point. That offer has expired and should not be the starting point so Palestinians can demand more now.
hometv1970 7 months ago
@hometv1970
continued - The main problems with this is that moderates like Fayyad who may want to negotiate for sincere peaceful resolution do not have the publc backing of the Palestinians. The Palestinians are split between support of Hamas and Fatah. A leader that would be able to support a two state solution is questionable.
On the other side, Bibi may not be the one who will bring forward a peace proposal (unlike in 1947,1978,2000, 2008) that would even satisfy a moderate Pal leader
hometv1970 7 months ago
Wow .. looks like Israel is in trouble :(
krisv001 9 months ago
The United States does not believe what he is saying. Two states.
I think he is going to start backsliding and change his story concerning the 67 lines. (obama)
The women in the blue dress needs to stay home and bake cookies for her grandchildren. She calls Netanyahu weak???? How would you like to have his job???
blinko656 9 months ago
The Israel area was a barren unused land prior to the Belfour Declaration. It is a well known fact that the Arabs encouraged their people to move there to occupy so that when the Jewish state went into effect, they would have established a population claim. Why are all those Arab refugees not being accepted back into Arab countries? Because it looks bad for Israel if they are looking like they have no where to go. "Cold Arabs" is the only reason those people have no home, not Israel. God knows!
wayinoutreach 9 months ago
@wayinoutreach I really shouldn't be responding to your comment, since it is so ridiculously false. Where in God's name are you getting your "facts". I guess you were gullible enough to believe that Palestine was "a land for a people, for a people without a land"? It doesn't take very much to debunk this myth. The Balfour Declaration, which was incorporated into the Mandate for Palestine provided for a homeland for the Jews in Palestine. Key word being...IN, not all of Palestine. Cont.>>>>>>.
steute2011 7 months ago
@wayinoutreach The documents clearly acknowledge the presence of a indigenous non-Jewish population, i.e.Arab Palestinians. The document insisted that nothing should be done which might prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine. Direct quote.
steute2011 7 months ago
@steute "insisted that nothing should be done which might prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine. Direct quote"
Right, & diplomatic language is not used to run to the meaning that if a single Arab insists that Islam must reign for 100% of the region, with no exception, that's not the extent that any diplomat or politician would accept, yet that's their interpretation. I'm sure the Islamic Imperialists appreciate your absolutist solidarity.
constructivereconcil 7 months ago
@steute "insisted that nothing should be done which might prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine. Direct quote"
In fact you've touched on the crux of the matter. They are insisting that any lack of dhimmitude violates that 'promise.' Please research dhimmi in Islam to understand precisely what they expect from Jews. If you still want to fight for the irony of "the right to take away rights" of Jews, then you'll rate even higher on the scale.
constructivereconcil 7 months ago
@steute "insisted that nothing should be done which might prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine. Direct quote"
Thanks for bringing that up. It's so much more powerful when YOU or THEY try to use it. Nobody would believe me saying that anyone thinks this way. I should pay you.
constructivereconcil 7 months ago
@steute2011 Go to mideast web .org & read it for yourself. It is in God's name that I get my facts. Israel was a nation before Palestine ever was. God gave the land & it's borders. The people that left did so of their own accord, & the land that was won in the 6 day war would never have been taken, had Israel not been attacked. The only thing holding back the Peace talks is the Palestinian/Hamasians unwillingness to say Israle has a RIGHT TO EXIST. WHY????
wayinoutreach 7 months ago
@wayinoutreach While I disagree with your version of the facts, I respect your position. Since you are looking at it mostly through religious belief and I am making a mostly legal argument, I do not believe there would ever be a common ground. So I agree to disagree.
steute2011 7 months ago
Obama is setting up Israel for a fall. He knows that the 1967 borders are indefensible. Netanyahu is trying to keep Israel together, completely surrounded by 1 billion hostile Arabs or at least all the Arab leaders. why have the Arabs helped their brother Arabs? Necause they want the end of Israel!! Pple have a look at PMW
1Daphdong 9 months ago
Pray for the Peace of Israel.
RANJO517 9 months ago
Can we get at least more than one competent leader in this world that cares about the lives of the Jewish people that isn't Netanyahu? And who is that woman calling him weak?! He's kept a cool head with organized attacks coming from all sides and Israel is still standing strong because they have those regions that GOD GAVE THEM BECAUSE THE PALESTINIANS WEREN'T FOLLOWING HIM. This is a total mess, it seems Truman didn't have an issue with letting them keep those regions, why is Obama ruining us?
TheFoilGuy 9 months ago
wow this is serious !
wkn9 9 months ago
Amen! Israel is an unmovable Rock!
Zalahblue 9 months ago
This is the Lord Gods real estate- no one moves the boundary stone without incurring His wrath
awaitthegroom 9 months ago 4
"The United States beleives?" NO, Obama believes
luettem 9 months ago 4
@luettem Obama, the United States and the rest of the world, with one exception...Guess Who? Yeah, it's Israel.
steute2011 7 months ago
@steute2011 There is One defender of Israel, that will suddenly 'show up' in the very near future. God, read Ezekiel 38-39, for the outcome.
luettem 7 months ago
@luettem Better hope so, because they are making enemies faster than they can keep up with. I can't imagine that God has anything to do with the way they are treating the Arab Palestinian people. It is always troubling to me when people use religion to justify illegal occupation, illegal settlements and human rights violations. I can't imagine what is so holy about that?
steute2011 7 months ago
@steute2011 thats BS--another person who reads liberal propaganda....The only people hurting the palistinians are their fellow Arabs....you better find the truth, and you are a LONG way from it at this point. The Arabs teach Hate to their children from their first breath, how to become human bombs, and the only civilized people existing there is ISRAEL
luettem 7 months ago
@luettem My blind friend, all you need to do is look at the votes in the UN on the hundreds of resolutions passed against Israel to see that out of 192 nations, the vote is never less than 170 nations in favor, with only seven at most against and the rest abstain. Read some of the international condemnations of Israels actions. The international community is not very keen on nations that thumb there nose at international law /Norms and ignore the hundreds of UN Resolutions that have been passed.
steute2011 7 months ago
@steute2011 "My blind friend, all you need to do is look at the votes in the UN"
You jackass. I just explained to you the Islamic conference, driven by religious bigotry, is used to attack Israel illegally & you buy it not because you didn't know about Islam, because you didn't care. You hate the same people as them. For you, that is all that counts. Grow up little girl! I am done with my patience, you are rude & ignorant not because of misfortune, but because you hate the inconvenient facts.
constructivereconcil 7 months ago
@constructivereconcil Hey dick cheese, unfortunately your math is not as good as your ability to spew garbage. Even if you took away the 57 Muslim Nations form the UNGA, you still have 135 nations, of which most always vote in favor of the resolutions against Israel. Even a large number of Israelis are against the illegal occupation and illegal settlements. I guess we are all stupid and you are the enlighten one. Stop trying to convince the world that Israel is doing nothing wrong and get a life
steute2011 7 months ago
@steute2011 You're a real Machiavelli of the post-modern generation, a master at politician...great vocabulary too. I guess I shouldn't worry about anyone who has no problem with Islam being the only organized religion to manipulate the UN. In your imagination, the only thing that ever happens are voting sessions with no dialog before or after, just voting or not.
Pleasant dreams, psycho.
Moron.
constructivereconcil 7 months ago
@steute2011 "Even a large number of Israelis are against the illegal occupation and illegal settlements"
Yes they are. There are liberal fools everywhere, and many who actually have to live among militants who threaten them. Nazis had lots of 'democratic' elections too, but you probably slept through that part of history.
Idiot. If you ever advance to adulthood, study the concepts of 'human rights' & "facts" in a democracy. Pure democracy itself does not actually give anyone any rights.
constructivereconcil 7 months ago
@steute2011 Moron, please study Nazism. They were elected in a democratic vote too. Dumbfucks don't learn from history after all. What lesson did you learn from the Nazis? Crazy white motherfuckers with short mustaches will never get elected, EVER again!
Simpletons.
constructivereconcil 7 months ago
@constructivereconcil We can't all be as smart as you...Einstein! It's too bad your parents survived the Holocaust. NOW GET BACK UNDER YOUR ROCK COCKROACH!!!!
steute2011 7 months ago
@steute "It's too bad your parents survived the Holocaust"
Not many gentiles in California were victims of the holocaust. I think none that I know of.
"NOW GET BACK UNDER YOUR ROCK COCKROACH"
You imagine yourself talking to insects? I hope you heal some day. Be well, & start thinking more about what you say FIRST, & there's less chance someone will feel compelled to correct you. It's not about you, jackass. I don't give a damn about your sensitive ego in comparison to spreading hateful lies.
constructivereconcil 7 months ago
@steute2011 "@luettem My blind friend"
So you care only about your fragile ego, but you can haul off and act condescending yourself? Hypocrisy in action. Go lick your wounds and if you learn to be nice, you might get more from conversations, that may even lead to your own personal growth rather than ending with you pouting petty insults.
"When the blind lead the blind..."
Germany 1920s, plenty of democracy there. Study the parallels before you pontificate about impressions you glean casually.
constructivereconcil 7 months ago
@luettem She doesn't care. I've been trying to explain to her, I encouraged her to look for the evidence rather than ranting loudly over headlines, but she got pissed when I explained the Islamic nations illegally working together to use religion as a political tool against Jews and eventually everyone else if we allow it.
constructivereconcil 7 months ago