Added: 5 years ago
From: gvv3332ca
Views: 77,528
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (91)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • you never had me. you never had your car.

  • @Yplate180 you yourself are ignorant... people say nos because it is a NITROUS OXIDE SYSTEM dumbass. why would you break it down to brands???? "hey are you running nos?....."no im running nex" do you see how stupid that sounds

  • @snow23cross23 Hah you mean chevy's wimp ass 4.3 V6? It's definitely a testament to government motors' superior engineering capabilities.

  • if you werent sleeping at the start the ranger might have won

  • those are both slow a stock 5.0 ho that year would do at quarter in 14sec

  • that time sucks i did that in my stock super duty

  • if the guy in the mustang new how to launch then he wouldve won go ranger

  • not a fan of the 80s mustangs but they were the last of the real stangs

  • @importssuckazz Not anymore, take a good look at the new 2011

  • Comment removed

  • fuck chevys all they are is government made crap

  • @fordcountry217 Fuck I beam suspension...made by FORD...

  • @kawi3000 i agree and the twin traction beam 4x4 i broke an axle and only found one in the whole country used for 180 bucks! not to mention how hard it is to work on anything.

  • not very fast for having nos. should have got a chevy

  • @snow23cross23 i think hed rather go throught the embarisment of running nos then driving a chevy

  • @importssuckazz hahaha thats true

  • why do cars do burnouts before a race??

  • Its to get the tires warm so they stick better on launches.

  • heats up the tires, makes them sticky get more traction that way .

  • are you serious?

  • are you serious

  • @PvtBl4ckburn yup, only works on certain rubber compounds though, drag radials slicks, etc. Street tires it does nothing. They usually have a small water puddle to do the burnout in also cause it heats up the rubber but doesn't strip too much of it off the tires

  • @MrStangaroo Waterboxes are to clean the tires off, has nothing to do with them "heating up" and getting better traction...

  • @RidgeRunner88 I was under the impression the heat gave much more traction... Even remote control cars have tire heaters for racing.

  • @MrStangaroo Heat is bad for street tires as they become hard and slippery, resulting in less traction. Vehicles with street tires should go around the waterbox. Vehicles with drag radials or slicks put their rear tires in the waterbox, spin them quick in the waterbox and then pull forward (out of it) to do their burnout. The waterbox is for cleaning the tires --- the burnout on dry pavement cleans them and heats them up. After the waterbox and about 5-7 seconds of smoke, you're good to go!

  • @RidgeRunner88 Gotcha!

  • @PvtBl4ckburn so the tires get better grip

  • The 4.0s are really fast off the line. I had a 07 FX4, and that thing was FAST. Beat a shit load of Hondas, and Acs, and even a Hemi Dodge. I wish I didnt sell that truck tho

  • OI wish my 93 Ford ranger was fix it was fast i miss my truck i hope to get it fix some day.

  • NOS isfor pussies!!!

  • nah, that's what your momma is for!

    in essence, NOS, is no different than a Turbo or a Supercharger...

  • no need to give thumb down because its true

  • damn that ranger is fast asleep you wouldnt know it until you heard it and saw the nos bypass

  • can someone tell me what he did to that truck

  • well idk everything he did to it but you can see nitrous purging

  • well for one he probally has it cammed, and bored it, then he prolly has headers, and the exhuast comes out under the door. He also has NOS and probally running on octane fuel. Thats probally only a few of the things he has done to it

  • if it was bored out it wouldnt be a 4.0 anymore.

    and if he had it cammed bored and new headers then he might as well stroked it too while hes at it lol.

    and with the things you think he has done if hes still running 14.13 then he wasted his money

  • 4.0 rangers are fast i have one 2006 4.0 sport

    even faster had a 2 lane road and nobdy didn't wanna let me over cause i guess they thought i was gon be to slow so i smash the gas and beat 5 cars before the lane ended

    but again i bought it used to i think he might have done something to the truck because it works diffrent then most rangers

  • Im working on putting a 4.0 in my pickup. Due to laws around here I cant put a V8 or anything like that in my truck... But i might be able to slide buy with an emissions passing 4.0.

    The 3.0 is a fun engine, but its just to weak. Plenty of passing power... but outrunning the local ricer gang just isint enough for me.

  • Mazda B4000 2009(...Ranger...), stock with 207hp: 0 - 100km/h : under 7 sec! Yeah baby!

  • Nitrous anyone?

  • go ranger!

  • ford when u really wanna haul ass

  • ill give it to fords too well there v8s

  • sweet welds. (rims)

  • that ranger is freakin fast. i have a stock 4.0 97 ranger and i was almost keepin up to my homies cobra. so i think even stock it comes with a pretty good engine

  • cobra i dunno bout that 0-60:8 seconds compared to 0-60:4-5 seconds

  • o yeah!!! I drive my moms 95 all the time its got the 4.0 and i smoke just about anyone that trys to race me! its really funny cause you wouldnt think that little truck would be so fast but they hall ass! i want to buy it from her then turbo charge it and make it alcohol injected. just cause people think they are gonna smoke you everytime

  • Ha, you drive your moms truck.

  • uuhhmmm ya its a truck you can haul things in it unlike a supra...DUH!

    If your mom had a tool you needed would you use it?

    what an idiot!

  • sorry bro...but your never going to make it burn alcohol....andi if you turbo it your wasting money. i had a ranger once and it came with the 4.0. sold it as fast as i could. theyre good for towing shit but theyre not fast.buy youself a 240sx,civic,mustang or anything else. but dont buy some shit like that from your mom to waste money on.

  • sorry people. posted this shit in the wrong place

  • sorry bro...but your never going to make it burn alcohol....andi if you turbo it your wasting money. i had a ranger once and it came with the 4.0. sold it as fast as i could. theyre good for towing shit but theyre not fast.buy youself a 240sx,civic,mustang or anything else. but dont buy some shit like that from your mom to waste money on. and you say you smoke people all day....here in miami you will get spanked. sorry to say

  • Comes from a guy telling me to buy a CIVIC yeah....HONDA BLOWS unless your buying a bike. 240's okay ill give you that. Mustangs i beat in my truck no problem why would i want a heavier car anyways? Plus its not the only car i have so its just a fun project for me. I rarely drive cars anyways im a bike guy. And yes id love to come downt there a spank a...LOL... CIVIC. HAHAHA do that all the time stock. VS Civic turbos they are fucking PUSSY dude

  • come see me my eg will romp anything you have...yeah its a civic cuz you prolly dont even know wat an eg is.. and yeah its turboed pushing 501whp on pump gas

  • I like how you get all defensive.

    Its cute!

  • wow are you gay or somthing faggot

  • ONLY ON TUESDAYS AND THURSDAYS;)

  • My ranger smashes on GTO's that are fixed up so... and Mustang GT's that are fixed up so... yeah Rangers are GOOD trucks with a LOT of power

  • @WikedBiPola You know why don't you? The 4.0 is the identical engine that's in the mustang v6. Thats why they rev so high. For a small truck, 0-60 in 7 seconds stock isn't bad (mines a manual) I know the autos rev to 5,500 rpms before changing gears.

  • I know of a couple of 4.0 OHV rangers that run 12's. Which is very fast for a truck.

  • does it have NOS and a supercharger?

  • For the guy below kickin77 ur ranger would kill his anyday fool his aint got shit on urs

  • i would love to race that ranger against mine. check it out at DANGER RANGER.

  • yeah ive seen your videos and the danger ranger would walk all over this ranger

  • damn, it beat a 5.o?!?!

  • no it didn't. the mustang won on a whole shot.

  • That's an older pushrod 4.0L. Them things were slow as S**T from the factory and barely had a step on the 3.0L's. That ranger was modded for sure besides the nitrous! Perhaps an RPS ride? The newer 4.0L SOHC is pretty bad ass, and has EASY potential to be a heck of a sleeper. I had an 04 with >>ONLY<< bolt-ons and rear end upgrades. 210.0WHP 239.6trq, 14:87@91.55. Kill list included a 2006 5spd Eclipse 3.8L(260HP factory claims).

  • That Ranger is not all that quick. He simply had a better launch. The Mustang had a higher trap speed by 5mph! By the way, Nos (Nitrous Oxide Systems) is one of many companies that produces nitrous kits, only the ignorant uses the term Nos when referring to nitrous, how do you know he is not using NEX or Nitrous Express????

  • I'm sorry, a fourteen second ranger isn't all that quick? He hooked incredibly well too, i wonder what his 60 foot time was?

    I'm impressed.

  • @Yplate180 SHH. no one likes a wise ass

  • @Yplate180 Sometimes when I say Kleenex I really mean a tissue... Ohhh 3 years ago.. oh well.

  • @Yplate180 i'am glad somebody else thinks the same way as me

  • @Yplate180 the mustang had a better start lol

  • @Yplate180 the mustang had a better start then the ranger, your just mad cause the mustang lost

    .

  • @Yplate180 just be quiet. guys like you ruin youtube. the point is the ranger won.

  • the only cool thing about using nos is when they purge the lines and you see the spray..other than that its a cheap way to go fast...you can put nos on anything and have decent times

  • that ranger is not stock

  • 90's 5.0 Might have been under 200 hp. the Newer 4.0 V6's put out over 200 HP. When it comes down to it, it's all got to do with luck, skill, and preformance. Hooah

  • mustangs fuckin rock but the ranger won....that fucked!!!

  • hell yea power 2 the rangers lol

  • NICE!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • hollllllllllllllllllllllllllll­lllllllllla

  • Damn that Ranger is pretty quick!

  • How the hell did the Ranger win?

  • ranger was blowing nos, but why did the W light go on for the mustang

  • people underestimate the ranger, a stock 4.0 is amazingly fast,(for a truck), and you add in engine mods, and the fact that the ford ranger weighs about 900 pounds less then a mustang and you have yourself a fun race.=-D

  • ur right people do i have a 2002 4.0 v6 200plus hp and it goes fast for a truck ive timed my truck and it dose 0-60 in 5.2 seconds bgeing stock and v6 4.0 its good for me so rangers are good trucks and mine tows like 7,500 pounds and i think its amazing, yea nice trucks.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more