When the predator becomes the prey, could it be God working in mysterious ways? I'll bet it is. Afghanistan 31 US Special Forces and seven Afghan soldiers were killed when a helicopter crashed. Just like the Russian helicopters were shot down in Afghanistan with Stinger Missiles manufactured by the warmongers at General Dynamics, down goes this US. What goes around comes around.
@impulse626 The ignorance of people is amazing. Do you honestly believe they are there for the freedom of the people? Stop watching your main stream media and get the whole picture. Stop being bloody sheep and wake up. The US Government are nothing but thugs out for profit, in fact most governments of the UN are in the banks pockets. Don't you think it's amazing that all the countries they are calling to attchk are not in the Federal Reserve banking system? and OIL!!! What a bunch of lies
"Embedded Reporters" = powers that be propaganda mouthpieces. Its sickening. People actually listen to these sellouts like they are reporting the truth. The only thing they will ever report on in on things they want you to hear, never what is actually happening.
"Humanitarian Aid" "No fly zone". Is that what they call INVASION now ? You brain washed sheep need to realize, we are not in control of our government. Orwell rolls in his grave.
Since it's a declaration of war it will be fun to watch if Gaddafi strikes back and bomb some of the allied enemies cities fair and square. It's then that these invaders will realize the peril of wars at their doorsteps than watch the suffering of others from a distance. Despicable assholes vultures.
So instead of the Libyan government chasing the rioters out of the city, we bomb the city and kill more people than Gaddafi ever has? So do we now allow the Shiite rioters to go west and slaughter the crippled governing tribes?
Aren't there MANY Middle Eastern nations whose people are protesting and revolting against their leaders for freedom right now?? I remember hearing something about protests in Bahrain, new ones in Syria (or something related to that) and a few in Yemen. WHY are we only focusing on Libya?? Not that I support this stupid-ass intervention and think it might do more harm than good, but if you're gonna support one Middle Eastern nation's uprising, support them all, dammit. Don't play favorites!
@whoo689 First, others may not have asked for help, Lybians did, though we decided to give them more than they asked for, which they shouldnt like. If they ask for a no-fly zone and we bombard them, thats just stupid and imperialist on our part. The idea that we have rule anywhere to do anything
As for coverage, I have been watching discussion of bahrain on the news, maybe you just missed it all. But then I am subscribed to a few news channels. Mox can only do so much. Not sure what hes covered
@whoo689 I want to add, I am for the missile strikes of tomahawk missile locations, but just listening how the US liberally interpreted the UN charter, and possibly the bombing of "enemy forces" outside any AA-base is the major cause of civilian casualties due to enemy forces being in inhabited areas.
wouldnt you like to have an interest in the company that provides tomahawk missles to the u.s. government? in other words wouldnt it be a great time to be a politician?
And we all ask again, where does the president get the authority to attack another country militarily?
Not to mention, most of the foreign fighters that went to fight with Al Queda in IRAQ came from eastern Libya. The same region that we're now protecting.
It just goes to show you that msnbc, cnn, fox are all corporate owned by the same sources. They all have the two basic functions: 1) spew out disinfo and propaganda, and 2) keep the people politically polarized and the left vs. right delusion alive.
@keithburgun I don't hate gays... I hate tards like you on youtube who say shit like "its just for oillll wahhh wahhh" as if we don't need oil, and as if we're not one of the greatest countries there is. Would you rather have the U.S. intervening all over the world or china, or iran? quit being a liberal douche and look at reality.
@Grevlo First off I didn't say *ANY* of that stuff, so I don't know why you're lumping me in with that group. Furthermore, you might want to stop using the word "fag" since apparently gay people have NOTHING TO DO with what you are talking about. Finally, why are you so hostile? You'd get your message across much better if you weren't so.
SixthtySixthSix, nice fonts! That said, there is a clear difference!
It didn't take false yellow cake stories, compromised CIA agents, or letting Osama Bin Forgotten get away at Tora Bora to garner missile strikes in Libya! All it took was genocide committed by Muammar!
WTF, Obama is doomed! If he did nothing, some would have called him a coward! If he does something, he's killing Americans and is a war criminal! For him, and in every way, being president is a no win situation, period!
Obama: "Today we are part of a broad coalition. We are answering the calls of a threatened people. And we are acting in the interests of United States and the world..." March 19, 2011
BUSH: "American and coalition forces are in the early stages of military operations to disarm Iraq, to free it's people and to defend the world from grave danger..." March 19, 2003
@TitParty Incase you lost track of reality or had your head stuck in sand, US was the first to launch missile attacks. UN approval pretty much means US approval otherwise have you seen hundreds of UN resolutions against Israel and 1 negative vote by US has blocked every single resolution. So I don't know if you are actually awake or you pretend you are awake, you definately need a good dose of reality check!
@TitParty I beg to differ,the US wanted it to seem like they were reluctant,they didn't want to do this alone,they continually called on an international support.This war is part of a grander scale of things,do the research. "US had to be dragged kicking and screaming into this conflict by France and UK." Your comment begs believe.The new world order is upon us,if you cant see the signs then your blinded by your own ignorance.
How long will we be there? hmm I know till the bankruptcy. The Arab league has changed its mind so fuck them end this shit right now. Why can't we let the world solve its own problems?
our money will be accepted as long as we are at a state of war with and occupying those countries... the oil will continue to flow into the veins of those occupying militaries, to keep those militaries viable as long as our monies are accepted for the oil.
@SixthtySixthSix Guess what it doesn't work that way. We are going broke fighting unfunded wars right now. We invaded Afghanistan for obvious reasons we invaded Iraq after Saddam said he doesn't want to accept the dollar any more just like Venezuela & Iran, see a pattern? We are on borrowed time & we will go broke if we don't change our ways.
Why is my comment with 15 likes not in Top Rated anymore while 7 and 9 likes are. Censorship at it's best!! Moxy care to respond how that is possible???
Frankly I see the air strikes as a lesser of two evils. How many civilians would have died if Gaddafi's (can't believe MSNBC misspells Gaddafi so badly)forces were allowed to continue to shell, and bomb his own cities? How many civilians would have died if we continued to do nothing? It's about time the world (Arab league specifically) understands that shit happens when you fight a war. Some collateral damage should be expected. I suspect the civilian deaths are mostly fabricated by Gaddafi.
all these revolutions and gaddafi's speech are cast in strange light if you've read "confessions of an economic hitman" , where the author basically provides the blueprint for what the cia does to nations it targets. first they ask politely for all the resources on the cheap, if no they then try to foment a revolution to install a friendly dictator, if that fails, they try to assassinate the leader and install a friendly regime, if that fails, they declare war and use military force.
Whenever you hear a US bureaucrat or politician say the words " he's oppressing his own people" you know the US wants to start yet another war somewhere.
Yep, controlled propaganda to keep the zombies stupid. This is just the beginning for there will be a physical invasion next with more civilian casualties.
@TripleSpeak No, that is not enough!!! We need them to commit to some surgical strikes on those areas and root out the terrorist organizations that are based there.
@PureAsGold Thou shall not speak against the global agenda. If he is lucky he will be given a warning if not then you will never see Him again. It would not surprise me if they allow him to be kidnapped or shot and killed. It is a war zone after all. THIS SHOULD BE A SIGN TO ALL -- FREEDOM OF PRESS IS JUST AN ILLUSION.
@HuxleyWasRight The situation in Iraq was completely different. The entire infrastructure was taken down, while in Libya the only targets are anti-aircraft weapons that are mostly in the desert, and armoured vehicles again mostly outside Bengazi. For the most part they're not attacking in cities.
@01000001011100100111 i didn't compare the two conflicts, i'm talking about supposed "surgical strikes", which are far from surgical, it's just propaganda.
my god... let me guess its the NWO that offed him... Anyone with ANY clue would understand remotes like this have a short time frame due to the Sats in the air etc.. you can clearly hear his audio fading before they even asked that question...
@TitParty Actually if it wasn't for Woodrow Wilson and the League of Nations, Hitler wouldn't have had the political power he needed to control Germany.
@TitParty Of course not, but Hitler did claim the League of Nations violated Germany's soverignty. Ironically it was the same League of Nations that was inept in stopping him as he began invading countries as well.
@DarthKap Hitler would have used any convinient scapegoat. I do believe military intervention is necessary, but one has to be careful choosing and executing them. IMO: just: WWII, Korea, Iraq I, Afgan until the Al Queda was gone.
That's not the point. The American people was not looking for a war in Europe only until we were attacked by Japan. FDR used japan as an excuse to gin up the America public for war. Germany was no threat to America if you look at the history logically.
@xxashyy Jesus Christ, why are you rooting so much for the Nazi Germany? You dont think WWII should have been fought? After fall of UK and USSR, guess who would be left standing alone?
Who said I was rooting? I'm simply saying we should have NOT gotten involved. Hitler would have been dealt with in Europe without are US service men dying in massive numbers. And if you notice almost every war we have been in are "leaders" uses WW2 as a excuse to go after other leaders we don't like. Particularly in the middle east. Not to mention that war paved the way for the apartheid State of Israel and are special "relationship" with them.
I condone that but there was no FULL elimination of anybody. I still see plenty of Jews. Actually I see more Jews than I see American Indians. And this HollowCO$T bussiness is another story in of itself.
@xxashyy You CONDONE full elimination of peoples/ethnicities? Whatever god you pray to, may he have mercy on you. Visit a concentration camp sometime, it'll do you good.
Also WW2 was the result of almost killings of entire ethnicities. Remember Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Were you in favor of the US government taking that action? That was a war crime.
@xxashyy are you fluent in English? Your sentences dont make much sense. "WW2 was the result of almost killings of entire ethnicities" implies WW2 started because someone was killings of entire ethnicities.
@xxashyy "Were you in favor of the US government taking that action? That was a war crime."
No, no I was not, and I resent the straw man position you've taken there.
"WW2 was the result of almost killings of entire ethnicities"
No, formal declaration of war was made due to Germany's rearmament and invasion of neighbouring territories, in direct violation of the treaty of Versailles. Stop twisting history to suit your agenda, it's dishonest at best, and again, an insult at worst.
@xxashyy "Hitler would have been dealt with in Europe without are US service men dying in massive numbers" That is utter crap. The combined efforts of men from several nations, including the US on the D-day landings were a key point of change in the war. It was the first time that the allies had the coordinated strength to punch through the European Axis defences. What you said is a grave insult to all those who died doing their part to overthrow a genocidal, fascist regime.
The war had nothing to do with America. And how the American public was maneuvered into that war by FDR was pure evil and trickery by our own government. Still the US government is using the same WW2 tricks to gin up the public for war.
@xxashyy "The war had nothing to do with America."
Again, I repeat the question: How close would the Axis war machine have to physically get to the Americas for it to have "something to do with" the US? There's such a thing as evil through inaction, and to sit back and watch the world burn because "it's not my problem" is a perfect example of it.
LOL. Are you joking? REAL compassion is to NOT get you're fellow human beings into wars of lies and deceptions like WW2 on up. Being in favor a bloody and senseless war like WW2 is the opposite of compassion my friend.
II) as to US troops elsewhere in the war, without the US to beat back the Japanese forces, who would have stopped them? how close would they have had to get to US soil in full force for it to become reason to be involved? How many nations would have had to have toppled under the axis war machine before a response in force would be acceptable for you?
@pamew by several do you mean the united states and soviet union? I don't know but I think the russians were in Berlin before the americans. It's probably true that the american advance through france from the west drained resources so that the nazi's couldn't hold back the russians from the east. but the germans made a mistake when they tried to penetrate russia in the winter, this weakened their forces significantly and probably was one of the most important factors that lead to defeat.
@pamew yeah if you're going to be technical. go you. but the largest contingent was us, followed by british, I'm sure the canadiens and french were much smaller forces comparably. there's probably good reason why the yalta conference mainly featured uncle joe, churchhill and fdr. and churchill's role in the proceedings was much less than the other two, which also has to say something.
@pistraurder "be technical?" I just listed the countries involved, in no particular order.
The French were a smaller force because their army had been all but destroyed at this point, and the British force was smaller because they had less standing forces, and of them, many were already committed to other operations.
@pamew exactly, someone might say " technically, there were british, french, and canadian forces involved in D-day, but by and large most of the men were american and it was the united states that played the dominant role in this military operation " and it would be accurate. the british and the french already went down to germany, canada's a joke, united states fought that war from pearl harbor on. just like when people think of iraq, they don't think about british forces, but technically.
@pistraurder "most of the men were american" Wow, you're full of shit... Us forces landed: 73,000 British forces landed: 61,715 Populations at time of war: UK: 47 million US: 137 million. So not only is it a case of nowhere near "most", the UK actually committed more troops in comparison to its population size, whilst already being engaged. Learn some real history, seriously.
@pamew you're a beligerent obnoxious asshole. why not list the number of canadians? or the french? maybe because that would lend more credence to what I was saying? every historian knows the united states was the driving force of the allies from pearl harbor on and was in full command, despite relative numbers. you're going to sit there and argue otherwise and call me names for stating as much? also it is generally agreed upon that ww2 was the official end of british hegemony, us became hegemon.
@pistraurder "maybe because that would lend more credence to what I was saying?"
You made the claim that US troops constituted "most of the men" involved. Using just ONE of the many other forces involved as comparison, I showed that to be utter shit. It was in fact you who began the disrespect by distorting and inventing your own history, downplaying the sacrifice of others, and referring the to the Canadians as a "joke".
II) It's odd that you'd say that most commanders were American, as, what with the fact that it's the D-day landings that have been the actual subject at hand (despite your attempts to divert), there were actually 5 British high-ups as opposed to 2 for the Americans. So even that argument falls flat on its face.
@pamew also I know a shit load of history asshole. here's some of the books and authors I have read: "guns germs and steel" "a peoples history of the united states" "nehru: discovery of india", "a russian gentleman" various articles by william cronin, ellen stroud, heather hogan. don't pick this fight asshole and really shouldn't start insulting people when you don't know them at all.
When the predator becomes the prey, could it be God working in mysterious ways? I'll bet it is. Afghanistan 31 US Special Forces and seven Afghan soldiers were killed when a helicopter crashed. Just like the Russian helicopters were shot down in Afghanistan with Stinger Missiles manufactured by the warmongers at General Dynamics, down goes this US. What goes around comes around.
BobbyWarrenMiller 7 months ago
he was probably just going to say, 30 to 40 knee scrapes or something reassuring like that. chill out guys.
stickyktn 11 months ago
probably 30 to 40 hundreds
Terje1337 11 months ago
in us government are the biggest terrorist
lengotin 11 months ago 4
Gotta be thousand!!!! Fuckin insane...
davidmdonaldson 11 months ago
what was he gonna say? around 30 to 40.....thousand?
MrDoobious 11 months ago
fucking american news, cut that dude off, that was so obvious, those zionist sons of bitches
proticalsonn 11 months ago 5
UN murdering cunts,just like gadaffi!
express375 11 months ago
I love oil!
thesoundgrove 11 months ago
Let's hit the golf course!
worryphree 11 months ago
What the fuck abut Bahrain? Don't they count in Operation False Democracy?
1966BOBBY 11 months ago
@1966BOBBY They ain't got no oil, bud.
worryphree 11 months ago
@impulse626 The ignorance of people is amazing. Do you honestly believe they are there for the freedom of the people? Stop watching your main stream media and get the whole picture. Stop being bloody sheep and wake up. The US Government are nothing but thugs out for profit, in fact most governments of the UN are in the banks pockets. Don't you think it's amazing that all the countries they are calling to attchk are not in the Federal Reserve banking system? and OIL!!! What a bunch of lies
Iamawake100 11 months ago
No oil, no no fly zone.
freedomsfart 11 months ago
if you people cant differentiate the moral difference between iraq and libya ....then all I can say is you get the democracy you deserve.
impulse626 11 months ago
Democrats and republicans in america are blood thirsty.
biggestdownloadever 11 months ago 3
Is there going to be a "Survivor Lybia"?
matchu4444 11 months ago
Hide your countries, hide your continents, hide your states, coz they invading everyone up in here!
newo82 11 months ago 5
@newo82 lmaooooooo!!!
83912daniela 11 months ago
America . fuck yeah, coming again to save the mutherfuckin day-ar.
newo82 11 months ago
2:55 Why Did he get cut-off when starting to talk about civilian casualties?
enstillfear 11 months ago 6
@enstillfear Must be a Fox amongst the MSNBC reporters.
AMVDialupDiaries 11 months ago
fucking dickheads coallition you are killing civilians
02daft 11 months ago
2:56 it's almost funny.
nebnubs 11 months ago
Oooooh yeah that's not suspicious at all. Who do you think is responsible for this? The timing was too perfect for it to have been a technical error.
CinemaGaming 11 months ago
"Embedded Reporters" = powers that be propaganda mouthpieces. Its sickening. People actually listen to these sellouts like they are reporting the truth. The only thing they will ever report on in on things they want you to hear, never what is actually happening.
sniper13x 11 months ago 2
Start @ 3:00 - Clearly just a coincidence....
pipewerkz 11 months ago
EVERYTHING told against Gaddafi id a LIE !
The Neocon/Zionist Controlled Mainstream Media sold you the war and people bought it.
0xTRX007 11 months ago
"Humanitarian Aid" "No fly zone". Is that what they call INVASION now ? You brain washed sheep need to realize, we are not in control of our government. Orwell rolls in his grave.
Ecoscienceczar 11 months ago
This is a fine example of why we need to donate to Moxy and make sure the lights are on for em.
russkeller 11 months ago
Since it's a declaration of war it will be fun to watch if Gaddafi strikes back and bomb some of the allied enemies cities fair and square. It's then that these invaders will realize the peril of wars at their doorsteps than watch the suffering of others from a distance. Despicable assholes vultures.
fsxmantra 11 months ago
Let Libya worry about Libya. America has its own problems to focus on here.
Batman83 11 months ago
Geez!! I'm starting to lose count of how many countries we've invaded.
jayrod59 11 months ago 16
Good catch mox.
Macwylee 11 months ago
omg so obvious.. it would be funny if it wasn't so tragic..
good catch Mox. thanks for the upload!
Myaucat 11 months ago
Team America strikes again.
watch?v=ce8CgJRkr_I#t=00m28s
Don't worry, everything is bon!
swiftysmithuk 11 months ago
Comment removed
swiftysmithuk 11 months ago
"Civilian Casualties that can't be verified..."
"CUT"
"CUT"
"I SAID CUT DAMN IT, CUT THE FEED NOW!"
EMPIREofPUPPETS 11 months ago
Tow that party line.....
Mahoivlich 11 months ago
I am living in the twilight zone
PHONEYPOLITICS 11 months ago
So instead of the Libyan government chasing the rioters out of the city, we bomb the city and kill more people than Gaddafi ever has? So do we now allow the Shiite rioters to go west and slaughter the crippled governing tribes?
dodododa 11 months ago
Evidence that the Americans are suppressing the truth.
mahmoud1995 11 months ago
@mahmoud1995 im american and i want to know the truth its fox news and other media that suppresses the truth from us
Tuzzi223 11 months ago
ANYONE that claims to be FOR war FORgets that wars target ANYONE.
EVERYONE that wants troops OUT of everywhere is looking OUT especially for EVERYONE.
RP2012
>:(
iTellYouNoLie 11 months ago
Civilian deaths will rise be wary people
PolakFury 11 months ago
@TheBobSerb or
eating for hunger
double entengre
>:P
iTellYouNoLie 11 months ago
I know this is gonna sound crazy but...has anybody considered that this might just be for the oil ?
luc649 11 months ago
What to you expect from GE's MSNBC?
All of these channels are Defense Industry, and Pentagon run.
EMPIREofPUPPETS 11 months ago 5
hmmm he answered it...he said they cant be independently verified,30 or 40...then the signal goes out from the war zone..
agent1up 11 months ago
This is NOT a NFZ - It is an invasion.
yaplonglong 11 months ago
I'm not a conspiracy theorist but holy SHIT... that was some perfect timing to cut him off...
Farf90 11 months ago
Aren't there MANY Middle Eastern nations whose people are protesting and revolting against their leaders for freedom right now?? I remember hearing something about protests in Bahrain, new ones in Syria (or something related to that) and a few in Yemen. WHY are we only focusing on Libya?? Not that I support this stupid-ass intervention and think it might do more harm than good, but if you're gonna support one Middle Eastern nation's uprising, support them all, dammit. Don't play favorites!
whoo689 11 months ago
@whoo689 First, others may not have asked for help, Lybians did, though we decided to give them more than they asked for, which they shouldnt like. If they ask for a no-fly zone and we bombard them, thats just stupid and imperialist on our part. The idea that we have rule anywhere to do anything
As for coverage, I have been watching discussion of bahrain on the news, maybe you just missed it all. But then I am subscribed to a few news channels. Mox can only do so much. Not sure what hes covered
waltermh111 11 months ago
@whoo689 I want to add, I am for the missile strikes of tomahawk missile locations, but just listening how the US liberally interpreted the UN charter, and possibly the bombing of "enemy forces" outside any AA-base is the major cause of civilian casualties due to enemy forces being in inhabited areas.
Doesnt make the US look good at all.
waltermh111 11 months ago
wouldnt you like to have an interest in the company that provides tomahawk missles to the u.s. government? in other words wouldnt it be a great time to be a politician?
JESUStheATHEIST1 11 months ago
And we all ask again, where does the president get the authority to attack another country militarily?
Not to mention, most of the foreign fighters that went to fight with Al Queda in IRAQ came from eastern Libya. The same region that we're now protecting.
lestliness 11 months ago
It just goes to show you that msnbc, cnn, fox are all corporate owned by the same sources. They all have the two basic functions: 1) spew out disinfo and propaganda, and 2) keep the people politically polarized and the left vs. right delusion alive.
seanlaca 11 months ago 3
Ｏｂａｍａ： ＂Ｔｏｄａｙ ｗｅ ａｒｅ ｐａｒｔ ｏｆ ａ ｂｒｏａｄ ｃｏａｌｉｔｉｏｎ． Ｗｅ ａｒｅ ａｎｓｗｅｒｉｎｇ ｔｈｅ ｃａｌｌｓ ｏｆ ａ ｔｈｒｅａｔｅｎｅｄ ｐｅｏｐｌｅ． Ａｎｄ ｗｅ ａｒｅ ａｃｔｉｎｇ ｉｎ ｔｈｅ ｉｎｔｅｒｅｓｔｓ ｏｆ Ｕｎｉｔｅｄ Ｓｔａｔｅｓ ａｎｄ ｔｈｅ ｗｏｒｌｄ．．．＂ Ｍａｒｃｈ １９， ２０１１
ＢＵＳＨ： ＂Ａｍｅｒｉｃａｎ ａｎｄ ｃｏａｌｉｔｉｏｎ ｆｏｒｃｅｓ ａｒｅ ｉｎ ｔｈｅ ｅａｒｌｙ ｓｔａｇｅｓ ｏｆ ｍｉｌｉｔａｒｙ ｏｐｅｒａｔｉｏｎｓ ｔｏ ｄｉｓａｒｍ Ｉｒａｑ， ｔｏ ｆｒｅｅ ｉｔ＇ｓ ｐｅｏｐｌｅ ａｎｄ ｔｏ ｄｅｆｅｎｄ ｔｈｅ ｗｏｒｌｄ ｆｒｏｍ ｇｒａｖｅ ｄａｎｇｅｒ．．．＂ Ｍａｒｃｈ １９， ２００３
SixthtySixthSix 11 months ago 66
@SixthtySixthSix That looks cool! Thank you for reporting user red... comment that YouTube or somebody else was trying to sensor.
esh1 11 months ago
@SixthtySixthSix Nice parallel statements,Any chance you could let me know where the bush statement was made.Regards
shaoliner2007 11 months ago
@SixthtySixthSix And they were both right.... quit being a bleeding heart fag.
Grevlo 11 months ago
@Grevlo yo what other groups of people do you hate besides gay people?
keithburgun 11 months ago
@keithburgun I don't hate gays... I hate tards like you on youtube who say shit like "its just for oillll wahhh wahhh" as if we don't need oil, and as if we're not one of the greatest countries there is. Would you rather have the U.S. intervening all over the world or china, or iran? quit being a liberal douche and look at reality.
Grevlo 11 months ago
@Grevlo First off I didn't say *ANY* of that stuff, so I don't know why you're lumping me in with that group. Furthermore, you might want to stop using the word "fag" since apparently gay people have NOTHING TO DO with what you are talking about. Finally, why are you so hostile? You'd get your message across much better if you weren't so.
keithburgun 11 months ago
@keithburgun Because it helps relieve stress after reading so many youtube comments.
Grevlo 11 months ago
@Grevlo
...and the dates?
SixthtySixthSix 11 months ago
@SixthtySixthSix Does it matter? They're both true.
Grevlo 11 months ago
SixthtySixthSix, nice fonts! That said, there is a clear difference!
It didn't take false yellow cake stories, compromised CIA agents, or letting Osama Bin Forgotten get away at Tora Bora to garner missile strikes in Libya! All it took was genocide committed by Muammar!
WTF, Obama is doomed! If he did nothing, some would have called him a coward! If he does something, he's killing Americans and is a war criminal! For him, and in every way, being president is a no win situation, period!
MyRiseToHonor 11 months ago
The USA, Russia, Europe, and Israel need to form an alliance against the middle east and north Africa; take it over and split the oil.
LoyalRonin 11 months ago
03:10 EPIC!
Wake up people!
RonPaulSwede 11 months ago
Republican President + Fox News = Everything is wonderful.
Democratic President + MSNBC = Everything is wonderful.
RonPaulSwede 11 months ago
Post by redcomic619 flagged as Spam with 5 Likes:
Obama: "Today we are part of a broad coalition. We are answering the calls of a threatened people. And we are acting in the interests of United States and the world..." March 19, 2011
BUSH: "American and coalition forces are in the early stages of military operations to disarm Iraq, to free it's people and to defend the world from grave danger..." March 19, 2003
esh1 11 months ago
@esh1 Except this time coalition is UK, France, Italy, Spain, etc acting on UN mandate.
TitParty 11 months ago
@TitParty Incase you lost track of reality or had your head stuck in sand, US was the first to launch missile attacks. UN approval pretty much means US approval otherwise have you seen hundreds of UN resolutions against Israel and 1 negative vote by US has blocked every single resolution. So I don't know if you are actually awake or you pretend you are awake, you definately need a good dose of reality check!
esh1 11 months ago
@esh1 US had to be dragged kicking and screaming into this conflict by France and UK.
TitParty 11 months ago
@TitParty I beg to differ,the US wanted it to seem like they were reluctant,they didn't want to do this alone,they continually called on an international support.This war is part of a grander scale of things,do the research. "US had to be dragged kicking and screaming into this conflict by France and UK." Your comment begs believe.The new world order is upon us,if you cant see the signs then your blinded by your own ignorance.
shaoliner2007 11 months ago
@esh1
wow
SixthtySixthSix 11 months ago
How long will we be there? hmm I know till the bankruptcy. The Arab league has changed its mind so fuck them end this shit right now. Why can't we let the world solve its own problems?
sintruder 11 months ago
@sintruder
the US will occupy Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, etc., until the flow of oil from those countries stops...
SixthtySixthSix 11 months ago
@SixthtySixthSix What difference will it make when our money is not accepted?
sintruder 11 months ago
@sintruder
our money will be accepted as long as we are at a state of war with and occupying those countries... the oil will continue to flow into the veins of those occupying militaries, to keep those militaries viable as long as our monies are accepted for the oil.
SixthtySixthSix 11 months ago
@SixthtySixthSix Guess what it doesn't work that way. We are going broke fighting unfunded wars right now. We invaded Afghanistan for obvious reasons we invaded Iraq after Saddam said he doesn't want to accept the dollar any more just like Venezuela & Iran, see a pattern? We are on borrowed time & we will go broke if we don't change our ways.
sintruder 11 months ago
@sintruder
oh yes, you are absolutely right.
the mechanism that is currently at play is despicable at best, but it is working to continue the flow of oil to the physically isolated US military.
there is a far better solution, though, to the option afforded by such a weak, base advance on the subject as is represented by the use of force.
SixthtySixthSix 11 months ago
Why is my comment with 15 likes not in Top Rated anymore while 7 and 9 likes are. Censorship at it's best!! Moxy care to respond how that is possible???
esh1 11 months ago
6:54 "Secretary of Defake"
ONQproductions 11 months ago
yes, at 3min he starts talking about 30 to 40 deaths it sounds like...
pgadeb 11 months ago
This makes me want to vomit.
karenbcz22 11 months ago
@TheBobSerb ...I can get behind that actually...
vinak963 11 months ago
MSNBC Caught Censoring People!!
You're not supposed to talk about collateral damage on television!!
DackIsBack 11 months ago
Frankly I see the air strikes as a lesser of two evils. How many civilians would have died if Gaddafi's (can't believe MSNBC misspells Gaddafi so badly)forces were allowed to continue to shell, and bomb his own cities? How many civilians would have died if we continued to do nothing? It's about time the world (Arab league specifically) understands that shit happens when you fight a war. Some collateral damage should be expected. I suspect the civilian deaths are mostly fabricated by Gaddafi.
vinak963 11 months ago
Holy Fuck...
DackIsBack 11 months ago
Aids and hunger claim 5.700 lives in Africa everyday...Japan & Lybia are PEANUTS compared to Africa. Think about it!
IntelArt 11 months ago
all these revolutions and gaddafi's speech are cast in strange light if you've read "confessions of an economic hitman" , where the author basically provides the blueprint for what the cia does to nations it targets. first they ask politely for all the resources on the cheap, if no they then try to foment a revolution to install a friendly dictator, if that fails, they try to assassinate the leader and install a friendly regime, if that fails, they declare war and use military force.
pistraurder 11 months ago
Obama is REALLY starting to sound like G Dubya now. Scary.
derekxnl 11 months ago 2
Youtube when you fix this site to work with IE9 64 bit please don't fuck up 3 other things like you usually do.
Smarterthanyouarable 11 months ago
Quick in and out, like Iraq was supposed to be?
JokerMouce 11 months ago
Whenever you hear a US bureaucrat or politician say the words " he's oppressing his own people" you know the US wants to start yet another war somewhere.
xxashyy 11 months ago
@xxashyy correction... "another war in a fossil fuel rich country."
PlateauEast 11 months ago
@PlateauEast Exactly! You didn't see them helping darfur, did ya?!
JokerMouce 11 months ago
@xxashyy have you not been paying attention to recent events?
vinak963 11 months ago
Yep, controlled propaganda to keep the zombies stupid. This is just the beginning for there will be a physical invasion next with more civilian casualties.
notyranny1 11 months ago
when the U.S went in to Iraq ostensibly to get rid of
saddam then get out
os·ten·si·ble
–adjective
1. outwardly appearing as such; professed; pretended
gwizzle1 11 months ago
Please world, save the American people from their fascist dictators by enforcing a no-fly zone over DC & Wall St.
TripleSpeak 11 months ago
@TripleSpeak this is the end game
gwizzle1 11 months ago
@TripleSpeak No, that is not enough!!! We need them to commit to some surgical strikes on those areas and root out the terrorist organizations that are based there.
notyranny1 11 months ago
Wow...
WebsterTarpleyDotNet 11 months ago
At 3:00 is when he get's cut off, that's just downright shady!
PureAsGold 11 months ago 2
@PureAsGold Thou shall not speak against the global agenda. If he is lucky he will be given a warning if not then you will never see Him again. It would not surprise me if they allow him to be kidnapped or shot and killed. It is a war zone after all. THIS SHOULD BE A SIGN TO ALL -- FREEDOM OF PRESS IS JUST AN ILLUSION.
notyranny1 11 months ago
Shh we can't let them know Obama is killing civilians cut him off!
Garlannd 11 months ago
thats it, cut him off when he talks about civilian casualties because it dosen't fit the narrative you want...
grendelcatt 11 months ago
@daguy1234 perhaps you should read the constitution before you embarrass yourself in the future.
Daniel44125 11 months ago
Reporter cut off air at 2:55
MutantKush 11 months ago 3
Amazing...
itellsya 11 months ago
It's disgusting how our governments use protection of civilians as the justification for strikes at the same time as killing those civilians.
there is no such thing as "surgical strikes", we leaned this after Iraq, it's a myth, civilians will die in high numbers during this air strike.
HuxleyWasRight 11 months ago 19
@HuxleyWasRight The situation in Iraq was completely different. The entire infrastructure was taken down, while in Libya the only targets are anti-aircraft weapons that are mostly in the desert, and armoured vehicles again mostly outside Bengazi. For the most part they're not attacking in cities.
01000001011100100111 11 months ago
@01000001011100100111 i didn't compare the two conflicts, i'm talking about supposed "surgical strikes", which are far from surgical, it's just propaganda.
HuxleyWasRight 11 months ago
That backdrop image is pathetic. News stations trying to turn this into entertainment.
01000001011100100111 11 months ago
@01000001011100100111 Yes, it is pathetic.
Sickening!
karenbcz22 11 months ago
my god... let me guess its the NWO that offed him... Anyone with ANY clue would understand remotes like this have a short time frame due to the Sats in the air etc.. you can clearly hear his audio fading before they even asked that question...
daddyoca69 11 months ago
The Military at its best right there. Fucking assholes
IlluminatiSeer 11 months ago
Looks like Obama will have to return that Nobel Peace Prize. What a joke that was.
xxashyy 11 months ago
omg 40 bombs
muhammadyousuf1 11 months ago
Why is most blog sphere left in praise these strike by Obama? If Bush did the exact same thing he would be called a warmonger in nanoseconds.
xxashyy 11 months ago
@xxashyy Not really. Bush was praised for invading Afghanistan. Iraq was not swarmed by protesters trying to overthrow Saddam.
Churchx77 11 months ago
Comment removed
xxashyy 11 months ago
@xxashyy Bush did the exactly same thing in 1991. I respect him for that and praised his actions. And I dont remember many calling a warmonger.
TitParty 11 months ago
@TitParty The word wasnt trendy then.
Churchx77 11 months ago
The NeoCon Bush clan are warmongers along with democrats warmongers Woodrow Wilson, FDR, and LBJ.
xxashyy 11 months ago
@xxashyy FDR fought fucking NAZIs. Are you a Hitler sympathizer or something?
TitParty 11 months ago
@TitParty Actually if it wasn't for Woodrow Wilson and the League of Nations, Hitler wouldn't have had the political power he needed to control Germany.
DarthKap 11 months ago
@DarthKap Its wasnt the League of Nations that bankrupted the Germany.
TitParty 11 months ago
@TitParty Of course not, but Hitler did claim the League of Nations violated Germany's soverignty. Ironically it was the same League of Nations that was inept in stopping him as he began invading countries as well.
DarthKap 11 months ago
@DarthKap Hitler would have used any convinient scapegoat. I do believe military intervention is necessary, but one has to be careful choosing and executing them. IMO: just: WWII, Korea, Iraq I, Afgan until the Al Queda was gone.
TitParty 11 months ago
That's not the point. The American people was not looking for a war in Europe only until we were attacked by Japan. FDR used japan as an excuse to gin up the America public for war. Germany was no threat to America if you look at the history logically.
xxashyy 11 months ago
@xxashyy Do you read the history? Germany declared the war on US.
TitParty 11 months ago
Only after several provocative moves by the US. Such as FDR ordereding the American Navy and Air Force to shoot on sight at any German war vessels.
xxashyy 11 months ago
@xxashyy Jesus Christ, why are you rooting so much for the Nazi Germany? You dont think WWII should have been fought? After fall of UK and USSR, guess who would be left standing alone?
TitParty 11 months ago
Who said I was rooting? I'm simply saying we should have NOT gotten involved. Hitler would have been dealt with in Europe without are US service men dying in massive numbers. And if you notice almost every war we have been in are "leaders" uses WW2 as a excuse to go after other leaders we don't like. Particularly in the middle east. Not to mention that war paved the way for the apartheid State of Israel and are special "relationship" with them.
xxashyy 11 months ago
@xxashyy Do you condone full elimination of Jews, Gypsies, gays, Slavs, Mongols?
TitParty 11 months ago
I condone that but there was no FULL elimination of anybody. I still see plenty of Jews. Actually I see more Jews than I see American Indians. And this HollowCO$T bussiness is another story in of itself.
xxashyy 11 months ago
@xxashyy You CONDONE full elimination of peoples/ethnicities? Whatever god you pray to, may he have mercy on you. Visit a concentration camp sometime, it'll do you good.
TitParty 11 months ago
@xxashyy Do you know what the word condone means? Or are you truly in favor of killing off entire ethnicities?
TitParty 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
No I'm not in favor of that and have you stopped beating your wife?
xxashyy 11 months ago
Also WW2 was the result of almost killings of entire ethnicities. Remember Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Were you in favor of the US government taking that action? That was a war crime.
xxashyy 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@xxashyy are you fluent in English? Your sentences dont make much sense. "WW2 was the result of almost killings of entire ethnicities" implies WW2 started because someone was killings of entire ethnicities.
TitParty 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@xxashyy "Were you in favor of the US government taking that action? That was a war crime."
No, no I was not, and I resent the straw man position you've taken there.
"WW2 was the result of almost killings of entire ethnicities"
No, formal declaration of war was made due to Germany's rearmament and invasion of neighbouring territories, in direct violation of the treaty of Versailles. Stop twisting history to suit your agenda, it's dishonest at best, and again, an insult at worst.
pamew 11 months ago
I meant to say I didn't condone it. My error.
xxashyy 11 months ago
@xxashyy "Hitler would have been dealt with in Europe without are US service men dying in massive numbers" That is utter crap. The combined efforts of men from several nations, including the US on the D-day landings were a key point of change in the war. It was the first time that the allies had the coordinated strength to punch through the European Axis defences. What you said is a grave insult to all those who died doing their part to overthrow a genocidal, fascist regime.
pamew 11 months ago
The war had nothing to do with America. And how the American public was maneuvered into that war by FDR was pure evil and trickery by our own government. Still the US government is using the same WW2 tricks to gin up the public for war.
xxashyy 11 months ago
@xxashyy "The war had nothing to do with America."
Again, I repeat the question: How close would the Axis war machine have to physically get to the Americas for it to have "something to do with" the US? There's such a thing as evil through inaction, and to sit back and watch the world burn because "it's not my problem" is a perfect example of it.
pamew 11 months ago
"How close would the Axis war machine have to physically get to the Americas for it to have "something to do with" the US? "
I would say at the Canadian border or somewhere that close up. Then the US entering would have been justified in my eyes.
xxashyy 11 months ago
@xxashyy "I would say at the Canadian border or somewhere that close up. Then the US entering would have been justified in my eyes."
It's nice to see such compassion for your fellow human beings. Truly, you are a pinnacle of the principles of liberty and freedom.
/facepalm.
pamew 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"compassion for your fellow human beings"
LOL. Are you joking? REAL compassion is to NOT get you're fellow human beings into wars of lies and deceptions like WW2 on up. Being in favor a bloody and senseless war like WW2 is the opposite of compassion my friend.
xxashyy 11 months ago
II) as to US troops elsewhere in the war, without the US to beat back the Japanese forces, who would have stopped them? how close would they have had to get to US soil in full force for it to become reason to be involved? How many nations would have had to have toppled under the axis war machine before a response in force would be acceptable for you?
pamew 11 months ago
@pamew by several do you mean the united states and soviet union? I don't know but I think the russians were in Berlin before the americans. It's probably true that the american advance through france from the west drained resources so that the nazi's couldn't hold back the russians from the east. but the germans made a mistake when they tried to penetrate russia in the winter, this weakened their forces significantly and probably was one of the most important factors that lead to defeat.
pistraurder 11 months ago
@pistraurder I mean the troops involved in the D-day landings as I specified, ie British, US, Canadian, and French units.
pamew 11 months ago
@pamew yeah if you're going to be technical. go you. but the largest contingent was us, followed by british, I'm sure the canadiens and french were much smaller forces comparably. there's probably good reason why the yalta conference mainly featured uncle joe, churchhill and fdr. and churchill's role in the proceedings was much less than the other two, which also has to say something.
pistraurder 11 months ago
@pistraurder "be technical?" I just listed the countries involved, in no particular order.
The French were a smaller force because their army had been all but destroyed at this point, and the British force was smaller because they had less standing forces, and of them, many were already committed to other operations.
pamew 11 months ago
@pamew exactly, someone might say " technically, there were british, french, and canadian forces involved in D-day, but by and large most of the men were american and it was the united states that played the dominant role in this military operation " and it would be accurate. the british and the french already went down to germany, canada's a joke, united states fought that war from pearl harbor on. just like when people think of iraq, they don't think about british forces, but technically.
pistraurder 11 months ago
@pistraurder canada is a joke ???
chiefy67 11 months ago
@chiefy67 What are you, new? The entire world agrees that canada is a joke.
canada is the blinking party hat on top of a giant retarded child....mexico is the unwashed groin.
drjacklint 11 months ago
pamew 11 months ago
II) I should add for your benefit that "saving private Ryan" does not count as credit for history class. Go read a book, you ignorant fool.
pamew 11 months ago
@pamew you're a beligerent obnoxious asshole. why not list the number of canadians? or the french? maybe because that would lend more credence to what I was saying? every historian knows the united states was the driving force of the allies from pearl harbor on and was in full command, despite relative numbers. you're going to sit there and argue otherwise and call me names for stating as much? also it is generally agreed upon that ww2 was the official end of british hegemony, us became hegemon.
pistraurder 11 months ago
@pistraurder "maybe because that would lend more credence to what I was saying?"
You made the claim that US troops constituted "most of the men" involved. Using just ONE of the many other forces involved as comparison, I showed that to be utter shit. It was in fact you who began the disrespect by distorting and inventing your own history, downplaying the sacrifice of others, and referring the to the Canadians as a "joke".
pamew 11 months ago
@pistraurder "and was in full command, despite relative numbers."
Oh, so now your argument has gone from "Americans comprised MOST of the men involved" to "well, the leaders were mostly American".
Yeah, at this stage you can't even seem to decide what exactly it is you're arguing.
pamew 11 months ago
II) It's odd that you'd say that most commanders were American, as, what with the fact that it's the D-day landings that have been the actual subject at hand (despite your attempts to divert), there were actually 5 British high-ups as opposed to 2 for the Americans. So even that argument falls flat on its face.
pamew 11 months ago
@pamew also I know a shit load of history asshole. here's some of the books and authors I have read: "guns germs and steel" "a peoples history of the united states" "nehru: discovery of india", "a russian gentleman" various articles by william cronin, ellen stroud, heather hogan. don't pick this fight asshole and really shouldn't start insulting people when you don't know them at all.
pistraurder 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@pistraurder "don't pick this fight asshole and really shouldn't start insulting people when you don't know them at all."
Wow, thanks for that hilarious example of both hypocrisy and Irony...
pamew 11 months ago