Nuclear Fusion

[killcarmine]

Nice music lol

[MrJonkelp]

very interesting thanks

[deadmanbalckhorse]

Could you please tell me what is the balanced nuclear reaction of Uranium into

U -- Ba + Kr+ n + Energy ??????

[streincorp]

@deadmanbalckhorse

There is nothing to balance, because is not a chemical reaction. The number of neutrons is never the same. Statistically for each reaction are produced 2.5 neutrons, that means a reaction can emit two neutrons and another emits three neutrons or only one... and so on.

The 235U -->138Ba +86Kr +11n is a pretty improbable reaction. Supposing are emitted two neutrons a typical fission is 235U -->137Ba +96Zr +2n +about 200 MeV. But these are the final stable products.

[2110kop]

Nuclear fusion is going to be our energy future. Star Scientific's muon catalysed fusion. See their youtube video "In the Footsteps of Fusion"

[godinferno2]

Just a question, how does energy actually get released from Nuclear fusion reactions? I've been looking the answer to this for some time and can't find any convincing answers. Cheers.

[streincorp]

@godinferno2

In a fusion reaction for energetic purposes - like reaction in the sun - the DIFFERENCE OF MASS between the final nucleus and the sum of the colliding nuclei masses becomes energy (E=mc^2).

This energy is partially released with the emission of photons and the remaining part is the nucleus recoil that contributes to thermal agitation. Photons may be absorbed by the medium and became thermal energy too.

So the energy of fusion is, at the end, thermal energy

[godinferno2]

@streincorp Oh right, that makes sense cheers. I guess that this is a similar principle in fission too, whereby the binding energy is released from the split nuclei?

[SinchanPaul]

@godinferno2 hey bro, actually in such a fusion some percentage of mass is anhillated(lost and converted into energy).dats y if 2 hydrogen atoms fuse d resulting helium atom has lesser mass dan d combined mass of d hydrogen atms.

[markymark443]

i really needed this vid for my physics project! thank you so much! :)

[streincorp]

@markymark443 you're welcome

[nasca11buziaczek]

nuclear fusion its nothing good for humans, we must stop produce nuclear energy !!!

[streincorp]

@nasca11buziaczek NO, you are wrong. Today are used only nuclear FISSION of unstable elements that produces dangerous waste; nuclear FUSION does NOT produce radioactive waste.

And there are no nuclear fusion reactors yet.

Scientific research about this new kind of energy shouldn't be stopped! - it represents a solution for the problem of the energy on Earth (together with the solar, wind and geothermal energies).

[meronmotors]

@streincorp I think you are right and wrong. The fission produces unstable elements (radioactive) The research should DEFINATLY not be stopped. It could in a sence let us live anywhere. We could create our own oxygen, we could build our own sun. However where I think your are wrong is that Fusion does not produce radioactive waste. However The sun (which is a big nuclear fusion reactor) is emiting radioactive waste. A very large amount of it. (or is this because of the rays and not the reaction?

[streincorp]

@meronmotors

1) Depends from what you use as reagents for the FUSION: using Deuterium to produce Helium and energy shouldn't produce any unstable waste. And "controlled nuclear fusion" doesn't means to create a "little Sun" on Earth (no it isn't like in Spiderman II movie xD), a nuclear reactor can't be compared to the little inferno inside the Sun - except for a H-bomb.

[streincorp]

@meronmotors

2) the Sun emits a lot of radiations, but mainly in form of photons, heat, gamma and X rays (all electromagnetic waves) and a lot of neutrinos (they are supposed not dangerous).

Anyway, it is NOT the same thing of Uranium, Plutonium, etc.

The rays coming out from a nuclear fusion reaction can be reflected using adequate screens and mirrors.

Oh, I forgot the solar wind (mainly made of protons) but it comes only from the Sun.

[meronmotors]

@streincorp If I walked on the sun with a good sun screen would I still get radiation? Does it produce the same kind of radiation that comes from our uranium 235 or is the radiation only from the rays it prduces?

[Racer5103]

@nasca11buziaczek

We must also stop the use of oil, coal, and gas................ lets all go back to horse and buggies

idiot

[JonThm]

We see nuclear fusion from steam

[halcyonylove]

So is that all about fusion

[JonThm]

Turbulent steam does nuclear fusion

[JonThm]

Do fusion from H2O

[JonThm]

turbines do fusion from H2O

[adlinasnap]

hey, do you know what application i can use to make something like this? please reply asap.

[streincorp]

@adlinasnap do u mean 3d effects? I suggest u to use 3DStudio max or Maya3D, with particles systems and meshes melting together.

See also Blender, LightWave, Cinema4D or other 3d software using the "METABALLS" technique.

[adlinasnap]

@streincorp thank you so much! :)

[JonThm]

Fusion goes off from H2O

[trbomkiv]

Physics porn at its best.

[PBmunchkin]

@trbomkiv lol i myself am a freshman and im already taking my last year of physics

[psychobillylx]

now that's a song to fuck too:D

[splashisland69]

sexy beat :)

[zaloniii]

Sexy video!! Nice.

[JonThm]

Nature does nuclear fusion from water! Shining a laser into H gas also does it

[nickharvey7]

Neat graphics!!

[scientificboysclub]

DUDE I am downloading this and showing it in my class ROOM !! OK !

I will tell to my teacher that you did it LOL...

But if explanation is included it would be cool !

[streincorp]

O_O  amazing!

[damuschka]

Nuclear Fusion gehddostyle... i even expected a rap to that sound.

[monod01]

whats the name of the sound/song?

[streincorp]

ehmm... I'm not sure... I've extracted it from an old PC game, a lot of years ago: Winstar95 by Monolith.

But I never found any traces of it on the web...

[ZenonDorinPower]

man this is awsome

[Hammeron2M]

Do the particles have become one mass of particle could they bond normally as in regularly understood atomic bonding into a molecule?

[streincorp]

Some theories tries to explain it in this way; but are actually unknow how the forces works inside a compound nucleus, yet

[JonThm]

We also see nuclear fusion from the turbuelnt flow of H2O

[Lishy1]

Omg I'm looking those as danmaku and not nuclei.

I haz played too much Touhou ~_~

[mrnuage]

@Lishy1 I guess you typed something like "nuclear fusion" in order to find the final boss theme and you got there.

[DanieleAndreani95]

fantastica!

[scientificboysclub]

you r really very good at Max .. that's cool !

I love this vdo !

[Noatato]

woooooooooow thts amazing

[Santoslhelpa]

i find it a highly interesting hteory

the answer to it all is in SPACE and the subatomic world

and the electromagnetism

it would be an incredibly simple world when it consists of one subatomic partcle in different energy states

btw doesnt wave mean the photon consists of two parts _? one neutral and one wiht charge? so the wave is that photons SPIN ?

[arthenor007]

You should read about string theory and you will find that it's perfectly possible that the basic compound of all matter is truly one and the same. But whatever holds true, it is definitely NOT the photon, had you read any of my comments you would know why, apparently you didn't. That's not how a debate works, you know?

[Santoslhelpa]

a debate..aha..

look

im strafing an internet cafe for ten minutes and im not interested in a debate right now

consider a private message when you want a debate.

greets

[arthenor007]

So basically what you are doing is going to the internet café to promote some bullshit unproven and unprovable theory of spinning photons creating mass and gravity, but you are not interested in somebody challenging your notion of its correctness.

Maybe you should restrain yourself to your own area of expertise and stop making claims about things you don't understand.

[Santoslhelpa]

dont get so hostile because im not even slightly interested in your sensless provocation based on hte disappointment that i couldnt discuss waht you had to say.look dont see it as attack consider it. give it a try thats how inventions are made usually thats how great things are. you would be a nay sayer in theory of gravity or heliocentric worldviews donthostilisise it away so cheaply giveitatry andwhenyouresmarter check it its abeautiful thesis/tehroy like a spitfire warbird

[arthenor007]

There is no need to give theories a try which can be unproved in the blink of an eye.

THAT's how science works. You approach everything with scepticism. You listen to what the other one has to say, compare it to the facts and realize it does or doesn't work.

Your theory, as fascinating as it may be, is false. It's as simple as that.

Science never gives 'a try' to a theory it can prove to be incorrect.

[Santoslhelpa]

AAAAAAAAAAAAWESOME!! fits all pretty well

very interesting

so its true

the nuclei are not so clearly separated asi thoght

i have this theory that its all just a photon that spins in circle or many

at lgiht speed and htat would make mass

so that gravity is just movement

and that space planets gravitty is just energy trasfer on a photon level subatimocally before gravity have effect

there is effects of graivrty on the photons but that doesnt keep em from transmitting energy

[A15KaldrinJAB]

youre stupid, dont make up some bullshit and say this is my theory to sounds mart. Everyone knows that that is wrong and it always has been wrong.

[arthenor007]

If gravity was transmitted by photons, there would be no gravity in a place without photons. The presence of photons can be measured and documented, even though this process is a bit fussy due to the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.

As there clearly is gravity in rooms without photons, i find it hard to believe they are the transmitter.

[Santoslhelpa]

gravity is the EFFECT

its Electromagnetism OR gravity

remember

we look at the b a s i s

BENEATH the atoms

i consider gravity as a macro phenomenon

photons but as a subatmic phenomenon where hte rules of electromagnetism describe that htere is happening something but not exactly WHAT

[arthenor007]

Additionally spinning in a circle won't make the photon create mass any more than flying in a straight line.

[Santoslhelpa]

no when the photn has mass and spins in a circle fast it would create gravity towards hte center in theory wouldnt it? liek a gyro scope heisenbergs uncetrtainty principle supports the theory REMEMBER THAT ALL HAPPENS IN SPACE. all on earth in subatomic world HAPPENS IN THE NATURE OF SPACE

[arthenor007]

The problem with this is that a photon has no inclination to spin in a circle in the first place. Unless there's an external force acting on the point-mass it's trajectory will remain unchanged. We must not forget that the gravitational pull exerted by mass is always directed 'toward' the mass, never away from it. So basically, your spinning photon creates gravity leading away from the center toward the orbital circumference.

[Santoslhelpa]

in the sun there is no

way

to

dodge

hte natural wave movement plus reroute adn rereoute and rereroute forms waht??????

A CIRCLE

[arthenor007]

That's complete bullshit, sorry to say it so bluntly. It's true that the photons in the sun are constantly rerouting, being absorbed and re-emitted. However, the orientation of their velocity vector remains.

[arthenor007]

This can be visualized intuitively:

Imagine you are within the circle and the photon spins around you at high speed. Let's say you are a little left of the circles center. Every time the photon passes on the left, you will receive a gravitational pull from it which is larger than the gravitational pull you will receive every time it passes to your right because the force of gravity decreases by the inverse square of the distance (Fg=GmM/r²).

So eventually you hit the circles left boundary.

[Santoslhelpa]

its density

its a matter of density

EXPERIMENT:

HOW

DO LASERS ACT WHEN THEY HIT EACH OTHER

AND WHY DO THEY WANNA STICK TOGETHER ASSUMING HTEY WANT

IN A CERTAIN BOUNDARY

WHEN THEY HIT EACH OTHER

HOW PHOTONS BEHAVE THERE IS THE KEY

[arthenor007]

If you are approaching the photon from outside it's orbital circumference the gravitational pull would indeed be directed toward the center. But i don't see where this supports a theory of spinning photons creating gravity.

Photons don't spin in circles and gravity is present when photons are not. There's as much gravity in bright daylight as there is in a darkroom. And that's true for the entire spectrum from radio to gamma waves.

[JonThm]

Fluid turbulance can overcome teh strong atomic force, for atomic and molecular H.

[wefiyhigh56]

Intresting

[dormiroM]

Bellissimo !

[cabbotron]

Based on the energy required to collide these particles with a significant energy to surmount the so-called coulomb barrier, a reaction like this--if indeed it could occur by proton-proton collision, which it can not--would require more energy than the outcome of those anti-neutrinos that spray off near the end of the flick. How ridiculous!

no one understands what causes nuclear fusion in the first place!

[streincorp]

Do you really think that the goal of this vid is the production of energy?In this animation are showed some reactions that could occour in the collision of weakly bound nuclei. In this case, some experiments revealed an enhancement of the fusion cross section at energy below the barrier. Other experiments showed a reduced fusion cross section due to the breakup of the incident nucleus.

The resulting compound nucleus can emits neutrons, protons, alfa particles and obviously gamma rays as shown.

[streincorp]

You can read some articles about study of exotic and/or weakly bound nuclei by L.F. Canto et al.

[indiasrainbow]

hi streincorp i heard that it will take at least 30 years before this type of energy will be availible to the public , do you know why it will take so long? :)

[streincorp]

In this animation is shown a normal laboratory fusion, where is spent a lot of energy for experimental purposes!

But today hasn't been realized a fusion that produces energy by itself.

[indiasrainbow]

thanks :) great 3d video, hey just noticed you use 3ds max , check out "lifeform" on my youtube i used camera match and made a little animation too, you can see the match dots but its pretty cool! :P thanks again

[Germanjorge]

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa­aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa­aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

very good quality.

[streincorp]

thanks!

[MightyMaul]

nice. don't wanna be near one of those atoms when it decides to go a-bomb.