considering the way that animation was done back then this is beyond fantastic. A superb piece of music and that pre-digital animation...wow! But the waddling giant emerald still makes me wonder....
@TarotDona - whereas this piece is what made Fantasia for me and I saw it as the future of how music can be expressed and have seen elements of this in many current and past music videos. Great piece of music and great piece of animation to go with it, though crucially that is in my opinion. many may differ and that is the beauty of it all.
Honestly, I was disappointed in this piece. I feel as if the Disney animators didn't capture enough of the music, like they had done with the other more lively pieces. Where they made freaking centaurs come to life and prance around the screen, or yo-yoing flamingos... and this one...just kinda lacks the story interpretation the others have. Such a shame in my opinion. Could've done more with such a famous piece. : \
really??? this one was actually one of my favorites because it brought attention and emphasis to the orchestra themselves. It's what made it so different from the animated pieces was what i liked. Also it was the 50's....err 40's.. idk, haha! Anyway, it was a different period for artistic expression. But if you were disappointed, you were disappointed. Sorry you didn't like it so much. When you explain it like you did, i can understand. :)
@TarotDona I think the intention was to preserve the artistic integrity of the piece, since it is a Baroque piece after all, and programmatic music (i.e. music that associates itself with things outside of the music) was looked down upon. As such, in my opinion, Disney didn't really need a narrative interpretation, since it would most likely detract from the piece's musicality.
(Whether or not the interpretation here 'captures the music' effectively though, is really up to personal opinion)
@TarotDona - This is 'absolute music', which means the composer did not associate his work with a specific narrative. Instead, it is music to be appreciated for its own sake, hence why abstraction accurately dismantles it.
the old Fantasia is AMAZING. And I think each parent should show that to their kid at least once when they are young. It's amazing how much this helps their imagination. I remember from me when I was very young. Disney has done an outstanding work! This piece is amazing with all the lines and shapes, it just lets the child's mind to think in a more unconventional and inventive way. Not like today that everything is served on a plate. Imagination should not become eclipsed. We need more like this
The colours are...REALLY different from the first DVD in most of the animated portion. It's really quite puzzling to me as to why they would be so different... The clarity is really great though. Thanks a lot for the upload!
@Pluto002 Because the restorations have been done in different ways. This Lowry restoration is near enough 100% accurate compared to how anyone has seen the film for decades, backed up by original production documents.
The reason for this is because Lowry scanned the original RGB (Red Green Blue) Technicolor film strips and digitally re-composited them, whereas in the past, old single CYMK prints (Cyan Yellow Magenta Black) have been used.
In short, this is how the film looked on its premiere
@miniroll32 Ohh, I see. I kind of liked the darker/more saturated colour scheme since that's the version I've had for years, but I think I'll easily adjust to these original colours since the clarity makes up for it in the long run. I can't wait to get a copy when it comes out in the US!
I really think that, once watching this on a big TV, you'll appreciate the colours more because this colour timing actually 'makes sense', as it were. I've seen the restoration all the way through, and you won't be disappointed bud. Even say in the sorcerers apprentice, when Mickey is on the mountain top the colours reflect the moon-light accurately - they don't look washed out.
i'm getting the blu-ray on 8th November here in the U.K, woo!
@miniroll32 Haha, well I have a decently sized TV, though it's probably considered small by today's standards. I'm very much looking forward to seeing a less washed out version of Fantasia on it eventually though. That's great that you'll be able to buy it so early! I've realised that with every consecutive Disney film that gets a DVD/Blu release, my patience seems to increase so I've become accustomed to waiting.
this is some brains-to-the-floor-and-wall epicness
BlueDemon555 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I suspect Walt Disney took acid and listened to Bach with his eyes closed.lol
I can picture it happenig:)
Old Walt running into the studio the next day, wide eyed and still half tripping screaming :
"GUYS,,, I HAVE THE GREATEST IDEA,,,,, EVER!!!"
M139NG 1 month ago
Comment removed
M139NG 1 month ago
...Hard to believe that this movie was made in 1940...
tlagudtjq 1 month ago
...what the fuck did I just see?
orimarc 1 month ago
genial
dchaveztec 2 months ago
これはもう、表現の域ではなく文化財ですね。これまで何度見たことか。子供らにも見せた。いまは孫たちがDVDで見ている。
hazikami1 3 months ago
2:24 Sousaphones? ... why? lol
1texaseagle 3 months ago
@1texaseagle Philadelphia Orchestra used Sousaphones instead of tuba during 1920s to 1940s.
tlagudtjq 2 months ago
@1texaseagle Pretty sure they are tubas with front facing bells, rather than straight up. more common then than now, I believe.
musicgeek2007 1 month ago
considering the way that animation was done back then this is beyond fantastic. A superb piece of music and that pre-digital animation...wow! But the waddling giant emerald still makes me wonder....
tastyhorses 4 months ago
@tastyhorses i would taht this handdrawn animation over any HD animation done today done by computers in CGI
djuro20 4 months ago 5
lol it looks like the conducter is like suck it at 0:52
jacobmohawk 4 months ago
@TarotDona - whereas this piece is what made Fantasia for me and I saw it as the future of how music can be expressed and have seen elements of this in many current and past music videos. Great piece of music and great piece of animation to go with it, though crucially that is in my opinion. many may differ and that is the beauty of it all.
Thanairobian 5 months ago
Honestly, I was disappointed in this piece. I feel as if the Disney animators didn't capture enough of the music, like they had done with the other more lively pieces. Where they made freaking centaurs come to life and prance around the screen, or yo-yoing flamingos... and this one...just kinda lacks the story interpretation the others have. Such a shame in my opinion. Could've done more with such a famous piece. : \
TarotDona 5 months ago
@TarotDona
really??? this one was actually one of my favorites because it brought attention and emphasis to the orchestra themselves. It's what made it so different from the animated pieces was what i liked. Also it was the 50's....err 40's.. idk, haha! Anyway, it was a different period for artistic expression. But if you were disappointed, you were disappointed. Sorry you didn't like it so much. When you explain it like you did, i can understand. :)
shortypingi 5 months ago
@TarotDona
also, as a kid, this part did confuse the crap out of me... but as an adult now, i appreciate it for what it is.
shortypingi 5 months ago
@TarotDona I think the intention was to preserve the artistic integrity of the piece, since it is a Baroque piece after all, and programmatic music (i.e. music that associates itself with things outside of the music) was looked down upon. As such, in my opinion, Disney didn't really need a narrative interpretation, since it would most likely detract from the piece's musicality.
(Whether or not the interpretation here 'captures the music' effectively though, is really up to personal opinion)
TheWanderingNight 4 months ago
@TarotDona - This is 'absolute music', which means the composer did not associate his work with a specific narrative. Instead, it is music to be appreciated for its own sake, hence why abstraction accurately dismantles it.
miniroll32 4 months ago
the old Fantasia is AMAZING. And I think each parent should show that to their kid at least once when they are young. It's amazing how much this helps their imagination. I remember from me when I was very young. Disney has done an outstanding work! This piece is amazing with all the lines and shapes, it just lets the child's mind to think in a more unconventional and inventive way. Not like today that everything is served on a plate. Imagination should not become eclipsed. We need more like this
MystiqueBliss 5 months ago
This always needs to be in HD. Always.
Luciferdesrea 6 months ago
08:34 Walking coffin!
struwelpet 7 months ago
@struwelpet For some reason, that part ALWAYS freaked me out...still does. Couldn't tell you why, though! Haha
barrypotter09 5 months ago
@barrypotter09 Me too! It was kind of haunting.
meowkie 5 months ago
love this. Although not visually my favorite part of Fantasia, it might be my favortie musical piece of the film.
slugworth99 8 months ago
I wonder what it would be like to watch this in theaters!
O__O
Doughboy123x 8 months ago
@Doughboy123x I'd shit bricks
cookiemwonsta 8 months ago
@cookiemwonsta Especially at the Night On Bald Mountain part.
Doughboy123x 8 months ago
@Doughboy123x I did, both Fantasias,absolutely amazing. I dont think thats the original narration by Deems Taylor though
b3a5t1e 5 months ago
@b3a5t1e Is this shown in theaters anywhere anymore?
Doughboy123x 5 months ago
@Doughboy123x I dont know, it may be. I watced Fantasia 2000 alone in a theatre.
b3a5t1e 5 months ago
@b3a5t1e Well, you're lucky!
And, when was the last time you saw this in theaters?
Doughboy123x 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
quite simply amazing.
gibsonutd28 9 months ago
I'm speachless... No less...
WeThoughtWrong 9 months ago
i feel like in a Akira Kurosawa movie :O
SELFlnsurance 10 months ago
The colours are...REALLY different from the first DVD in most of the animated portion. It's really quite puzzling to me as to why they would be so different... The clarity is really great though. Thanks a lot for the upload!
Pluto002 1 year ago
@Pluto002 Because the restorations have been done in different ways. This Lowry restoration is near enough 100% accurate compared to how anyone has seen the film for decades, backed up by original production documents.
The reason for this is because Lowry scanned the original RGB (Red Green Blue) Technicolor film strips and digitally re-composited them, whereas in the past, old single CYMK prints (Cyan Yellow Magenta Black) have been used.
In short, this is how the film looked on its premiere
miniroll32 1 year ago 2
@miniroll32 Ohh, I see. I kind of liked the darker/more saturated colour scheme since that's the version I've had for years, but I think I'll easily adjust to these original colours since the clarity makes up for it in the long run. I can't wait to get a copy when it comes out in the US!
Pluto002 1 year ago
I really think that, once watching this on a big TV, you'll appreciate the colours more because this colour timing actually 'makes sense', as it were. I've seen the restoration all the way through, and you won't be disappointed bud. Even say in the sorcerers apprentice, when Mickey is on the mountain top the colours reflect the moon-light accurately - they don't look washed out.
i'm getting the blu-ray on 8th November here in the U.K, woo!
miniroll32 1 year ago
@miniroll32 Haha, well I have a decently sized TV, though it's probably considered small by today's standards. I'm very much looking forward to seeing a less washed out version of Fantasia on it eventually though. That's great that you'll be able to buy it so early! I've realised that with every consecutive Disney film that gets a DVD/Blu release, my patience seems to increase so I've become accustomed to waiting.
Pluto002 1 year ago
Thanks dude! :D
miniroll32 1 year ago