@JustAnotherGay96 yeah fecal freaks...not good for the booty over the long haul...again a "family" value. i could really give 2 burning shits about what two or more same sex people do in the privacy of their own home. but to try to influence in a public forum that packing fudge is wholesome and creative, that is another story.
@istepharella You can join our barbeque, but do you think you'll be well received when you snap angrily at people who look askance at you for putting ice cream on your steak? Because that's kind of what you've done with me.
@istepharella OK, ya blocked me. I feel so blocked. What I don't get is how you can't come to terms with the fact that not everyone is going to accept your lifestyle choices, or who you think you are. I really don't care if someone dislikes me. For example, I get called "evil" for my libertarian views of self-ownership. Now THOSE bastards would actually want to see me come to harm for my views. THAT'S bigotry! I really don't seek your destruction for your lifestyle. But I DO have an opinion.
@istepharella OK, you like yours manufactured. That's fine. There's always a market for women who dislike naturally made dildos. Hey, I prefer natural tits to silicon, but I wouldn't expect that if you yourself had a boob job, you wouldn't be somewhat offended by that stated preference.
@istepharella You have a right to your OWN property, and to your OWN self. But marriage involves legal binding to the property of OTHERS, so legality is more at issue than assumptions of the church. You shouldn't let your emotions make you so short-sighted. What good will that mean to you when your lover gets tired of experimenting with women and decides she wants to hook up with dudes again?
@istepharella Oh please. I can appreciate art, but I happen to know where it belongs, in the tertiary sector of the market. Drawing doodles is what you do AFTER class, and AFTER all the real bread-winning chores are done.
Bigot? Once again, I'm not stopping you from deciding whom or what you want to rub your female parts on. That's the libertarian in me. Your feelings for someone ELSE does NOT elevate you to any kind of status, moral or otherwise. That's what makes Obastard's nominee wrong too.
@istepharella Whores, eh? We can descend to that level of spite. That said, congratulations on being able to leave the trailer park. No doubt you now have enough money to pay the girl you love to pretend to love you back for the past 3 years.
@istepharella Yes, they are raised without fathers all the time, and it's unfortunate. It's been shown that boys grow up to be thugs and girls into sluts. Hell, most of my high school bullies were fatherless trailer park spawn. Nature won't be denied; kids ALWAYS look up to and require patriarchal affirmation. Without a father, they'll just seek out the nearest male dominance. With boys, it's gangs, with girls, it's the first jerk that'll use her.
@istepharella Well, beware judgment day yourself. It may not be what you expect. Just because you WANT something may not be reason enough to HAVE it. You really don't see the correlation of empires collapsing? Well...Rome actually DECLINED over years, but we'll collapse...and very soon. The ones that don't care are the ones I'm gathering ammo for. They'll be the ones without anything, and they'll try to take what I have.
Anyway, you can't properly raise a kid without a father. Sorry.
@istepharella I won't make excuses for marital infidelity. I personally believe it's as amoral as gay sex. These things are not exclusive. Divorce and infidelity SHOULD have legal repercussions.
Anyway, with the coming economic collapse and resultant lawlessness of a new dark age, this will all soon become a non-issue again, save for the peculiar tastes of those in power who are rich enough to buy same-sex concubines. It happened with Rome, after all.
@istepharella Yes it it. And I only imply what I think: that it's freakish. But I'm not going to demand that you stop. It's your choice how you live your life. You can have sex with whomever consenting adult you want, and I'll do nothing to stop it. There, you see? I tolerate it. And the only thing I did was give my opinion...we are, after all, entitled to our opinions.
@istepharella I DID define tolerance correctly, because by my own tolerance, I have not accosted you in any way. Your attitude and what you think about my OPINION, be it aggravated or conciliatory, is YOUR responsibility. I can be as insensitive and tactless as I want, but if I'm not demanding that you think or speak a certain way, I'm still being tolerant.
@istepharella You still seem to get the definition of tolerance mixed up with acceptance. Tolerance is tolerating the existence of another without trying to penalize, imprison, or kill them. Acceptance is doing the whole joining hands and singing kumbaya thing.
I'm not going to kill you, rob you, or throw you in jail. That makes me tolerant.
@istepharella No. I won't ACCEPT gay for gayness sake. I'll TOLERATE it, though. There's a difference.
Honestly, I'm not passionate about it one way or the other, except where our military's concerned, since troop morale and cohesive efficiency is far more important than someone's activism.
@istepharella Well, what can I say? I'm not an emotional woman. I don't blame the world for my design flaws (this part goes here, that part goes there...wait a minute the fitting parts are confusing to me!) and I certainly wouldn't attempt to attribute genetics to defer my proclivities.
@istepharella Love is a word that means so many things that it's almost subjective in context. But it almost never means the same thing as lust. You can love a painting or a parent, but what kind of fetish makes you want to actually fuck either?
@istepharella No child left behind IS a flop. And the Make-A-Wish Foundation is a private organization, created through the good will of like-minded individuals. It was never FORCED into being. There is no such thing as "forced charity" since the proper term is called "theft."
And it's not that gays are lesser; it's the insistence of institutionalizing a fetish.
@istepharella One kid's problem is not the responsibility of the other kids. There is absolutely NO way that anyone can presume to legislate attitudes. And I see no reason for a society to bend over backwards to treat with the whimsy of a few who want to change the name of civil union to marriage.
@istepharella Most of us see this for what it truly is: a Marxist intent to disrupt the nuclear family. The root view is that a family breeds a "patriarchal society" which leads to "fascism," or "capitalism" given current terms.
Yes, I'm sure you're not a total Marxist or a total socialist -whatever the case may be. But consider that you may be a mere stepping stone for those who are. And consider the ancient Greeks and Romans. Being gay was no big thing with them...but marriage was still hetero
@istepharella Well, I find myself becoming more able to get along with you than the typical leftist. For one thing, I see no reason, gay or not, why someone shouldn't see another in the hospital.
But I don't see how marriage and adoption will help anything. Because, you see, everyone is entitled to their own opinion (when have either one of us last heard THAT before?) but NOBODY is entitled to happiness. Pursuit of it, yes, but entitlement? No. That can never be given by others.
@istepharella Right, because any resistance to trying to institute a FETISH makes soooo many victims! And if you're "victim" enough, maybe you can get some free munnie!!! Gawd, how I despise entitlement whores!
I don't care what adults do in the privacy of their own bed room. I don't want to know. As long as it doesn't involve kids , animal , rape or adultery. Why do we need to know that someone sexually gets off by way of gay sex. Keep such info in the bedroom.
you know why? because "overpopulation"is deemed morally bad so more homosexual relationships which produce no children is morally good for the environment and the world.
There is a bigger agenda than the bs she is spouting
I dont think that the atmosphere is anti homosexual at all...I think that alot of laws past have been pro homosexuality...i think gat people fool themselves into thinking that they are not anti hetero...you just want to live your lives...the truth is that homosexuality would eventually cause an end to humanity if it where to be the standard...that is simply a fact...hope you have a chance to look at your argument for what it is...God bless...and you are loved.
India.. why you always gotta take the high road.. lol.. ok.. I'll try to be more like you... anyway.. we both know that the government is actually pro homosexual and that's where the problem lies.. see ya in a few.. lol
@kiryoku25 so planned parenthood exists as a creation of heterosexuals to get rid of heterosexuals who desire to destroy their own babies because they hate heterosexuals ? lmao. you make no sense!
I've studied real history and not only that I see real world experience with how this anti-homosexual atmosphere produces negativity
@kiryoku25 The world is overpopulated, why do we need people pushing for more babies either due to hetero-normality or religious reasons? I have a friend who is pregnant and wants to abort it but her parents won't let her because christ says no just as this christ asshole says no supposedly to homosexuality as well
This jewbag 'Equal Opportunity Czar' is yet another cog in the wheels of Obama's plan to "fundamentally transform America". This is "change" and "hope" for you.
Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders
I think that what is scary is how she discusses how to promote homosexuality in the culture. It is not what she said that is scary, it is that this is going on behind the scenes and she is one of the few with the courage to at least let us all know about it.
@edwardsson homosexuality SHOULD be promoted. heterosexuality should be stopped, we don't need more babies, and homosexuality will make people live more better
@kiryoku25@kiryoku25 you know you've got to be the stupidest son of a bitch i've ever heard from. is it not the heterosexuals that are going to planned parenthood? so how do you make sense of anything you just said.
All I meant by my statement is that homosexuality should be promoted in society, that way people feel more comfortable expressing that.
Oh dear me, I never knew that there was so little love in the world. Reading some of these comments makes me feel very sad and helpless.
Being gay is not a disease nor is it a 20th-century phenomenon. There have always been gay people in the world, and the percentage is not mounting. The only difference is that nowadays people dare to speak up for their rights. They are not trying to pervert anyone. They just want to pursuit their happiness, as everyone else does.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Ok a lot of people are wrong here! gay sex is niether wrong nor right! it is a completely nuetral act! It takes no sides! homosexuality itself is a completely neutral thing. Gay sex (behind closed doors, as well as straight sex) doesnt affect the well beings of any straight or gay person, unless that straight or gay person has issues to deal with themselves! Anyways I think most of you here are 100% wrong cus being gay and gay sex is nuetral completely!
Johns Hopkins University and the Albert Einstein School of Medicine already proved that no one is born "gay" it is a result of emotional, environmental & psychological influences. But you never heard that because the affluent wealthy gay community makes sure no one becomes informed. I will tell you one thing:I will never allow these sick reprobates to brainwash & pervert my children, which is a huge goal of theirs.
Stand up America. Fight for our nation! We are becoming a moral cesspool.
Could you please cite this claim about proof? Also I doubt that they claimed to "prove" this because in science there are very few things that are absolutely proved especially in psychological and medical fields.
I agree with you Jane5828. Would that more Americans would rise up and stand against this perverted, nasty stuff. The gays push and push to put their sex lives in everyone's faces. Let's send them a message. That we're not interested in their filthy, twisted ways.
She says "How can we do this that is strategically smart?" If gay sex is so positive and normal, why would you need any strategy???? Where on earth do the democrats dig up these perverts from??
When was it exactly that the disease of homosexuality became normal behavior?
As Obama-nation continues to de-construct the very moral fiber of this country we can only hope that reversal of this degeneracy and human blight can be reversed once we kick him and his socialist team out of here...2012.
Reading news today is a journey into the abyss. Heal homosexuals...don't encourage them.
Listen to the way she spits out "heterosexual sex." These so-called gays (who are actually the opposite of "gay" - i.e., vicious as hell) DESPISE heterosexuality and all it represents. Homos see themselves as terribly wronged victims, victims of heterosexuality. They will be happy only when they have made any expression of heterosexuality illegal (except the creation of children for them), take all your children and give them to homosexuals, and utterly destroy society as we know it.
"Those negroes won't be happy until all of them have five white families working for them....."
This is the equivalent to what you said. Why do you really feel this way there must be some reason you hate orphans and want to increase the amount of children that don't have any sort of parents.
You more so than any religious zealot have said the most despicable things and should realize what you are saying.
coolthomas, "negroes" as you put it (I didn't put it, you did), aren't forcing children as young as 5 years old to learn about homosexual sex. In fact, most blacks are clued in to the homo agenda and realize that the homo propaganda that claims "gay is the new black" is just b.s. Blacks, for the most part, are repulsed by homosexuality.
You are seriously misrepresenting the facts when you are talking about 5 year-old children. Showing children that there are different types of families and who makes up these families is not teaching children about gay sex.
"Blacks" as you called them are no more repulsed by homosexuality as a whole than other groups. There are religious people who are more likely to have an issue with homosexuality because of their religious beliefs.
Coolthomas2011 - blacks are indeed repulsed by homosexualtiy, and pissed off that homos pretend that they share the same civil rights violations history.
And 5 year olds ARE being taught about gay sex - including "transgenders." Homos are a big part of the New World Order, however you construe that. They represent the demise of the family, and foundation of civilization. The only way homos can "reproduce" without huge expense, is by accepting the babies and children that CPS steals.
Child Protective Services is where your problem apparently lies. I'm not positive about this, but I'm pretty sure that heterosexual couples receive children from them as well. I'm also pretty sure that if you had it your way you would rather a child stay in an abusive home with a heterosexual couple rather than live with a homosexual couple because without CPS who would have help children in unsafe home environments.
There are African Americans who feel both ways, don't try and deny that. Coretta Scott King, wife of the late Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, a leader in the Civil Rights Movement 40 years ago, was a huge supporter of gay rights and same-sex marriage.
She compared the present struggle of the LGBT community to that of African Americans only a few decades ago.
"t's not that the Red Cross won't except it. They WANT to openly allow MSM's donate. They are restricted by the government."
The FACT is the red cross won't accept blood from gays, the government does that to protect the blood supply from Gay blood.... my facts are correct, you should check yours coolthomas2011
No your facts are not...There is a big difference between the words can't and won't. The Red Cross, America's Blood Centers, and AABB have all urged the FDA to reevaluate THEIR policy. The Red Cross has to follow FDA rules.
Wake up people, homos won't be happy until heterosexuality is outlawed, all your children have been adopted by them, and sex with children is legal and celebrated. Watch my video on Frank Lombard - homos are hiding the real truth from you.
Barack Obama I hope both your daughters turn out to be GAY. That way you want have any grandkids. Sasha & Malia be sure you run out and find you a girl friend to hitch up with as you grow up, if you want mommy and daddy proud of you. You have to go against Gods will, and whatever is immoral to be a real Obama.
LMarlow, even if Obama's daughters aren't gay, their children could very well be stolen by CPS and given to homos. Where do people think gays "children" come from? It is much easier and cheaper to steal children than to get artificial insem.
Yay! Let's just all CELEBRATE those hotspot mattresses listed on craigslist, where AIDS is transmitted, in front of little Billy and Susie Smith, or at the Faire, or wherever, because our government says its good, in the face of our God.
OK what did he prove: he would fired a person and hired one lesbian, to replace another employee which already was doing the job.Isn't that reverse discrimination? How can it be called Equal Employment Opportunity when you are hired only because of your Sexual orientation? I want to see equal rights not the reverse side of it. That's like saying I'll show you Your Sexual Preference should not have a barren on any job. Unless you are a child molester, or sex pervert.
VonHelton, not only does homosexuality NOT produce children, it destroys children and families. It is an absolute fact that CPS is stealing children from good parents. It is also an absolute fact that CPS gives these children to homosexuals. It is also an absolute fact that these children get raped, in foster "care" and when they are adopted. The homo dominated media won't report it though, but the foster children will tell you the truth.
another Zionist promoting fag sex... excuse me... they also are behind the entire Gay Rights movement too... Homosexuality is a brainchild of family destroying Zionist agendas.
"A primary goal of the homosexual agenda is to promote the lifestyle in public schools. This occurred quickly and intensely after gay marriage was imposed in Massachusetts, where homosexual relationships are taught to children as young as kindergartners, as recounted by the decision of Parker v. Hurley.[4] " Wikipedia
If you were to actually read the link in your quote, a book that showed different types of families is not promoting homosexuality.
That would be that same as not showing interracial couples because some parents may object to that.
Where would parental control of schools end?
You can't teach about WWII because Timmy's parents are Holocaust deniers. Think about what schools would be like if everything had to be approved by all parents.
This lady, sorry, woman, keeps spouting off about "moral values". She hasn't got a clue what morals are!!!
Yes, sex brings intimacy in a relationship, however, it needs to be a moral relationship. Morals "used" to be defined by biblical terms, however, today they are based on "man's" interpretation, which is based on what personal wants and desires, no absolute.
Tolerance is for those that want others to tolerate their immoral behaviour.
That may be, but that's not what you stated. Using the Bible to define your personal morals is fine, but what about those that don't believe in the Bible?
You have a right to your personal beliefs, but you cannot force your beliefs upon others.
Also you say you are against immoral relationships, so why are there not groups of people who are vigorously working to criminalize sex out of wedlock or single parents?
You're right about sex out of wedlock. We should have. However, if a couple lives together, they are considered married under common law, man and woman. Common law does not recognise same sex unions. Legal law does.
If you don't believe in the law of gravity, I won't force my "belief on you if you want to jump off a cliff, unless of course I want to save your life.
Morals are absolutes, have been, are and will be, whether you believe them or not. You don't have to believe in them to make
By saying that you are claiming to know the future. This means that you know of God's plan, and therefore you are considering yourself a prophet. Hmmm...isn't there something in the Bible about self-proclaimed prophets
"I can predict the future based on history, someone's actions, and knowing basic truths."
You say you can PREDICT the future. Christians believe God is the only one who knows what will happen. God can tell his plans to prophets. You therefore claim you are a prophet. This is what you just said think about your actual statement prior to making it.
Say someone jumps from a cliff, there is a chance that they won't fall; it's not a high probability, but it does exist as a probability.
No, everyone won't agree. You forget there is greed, pride, and selfishness. People want what they want and they are going to get it.
Would you agree that murder and robbery is absolutely wrong? Someone robs a bank and shoots 10 unarmed people in the process. Well, that person didn't believe in that moral. Still doesn't make it right.
Morals apply to ALL, whether you agree or not. There are always consequences to going against basic morals.
While I personally feel it's wrong, there is a legal, logical reasoning for murder and robbery being illegal. If murder was legal there would be no structure to our society because everyone would be afraid of being killed. Robbery is illegal because if it was legal there would be no point in owning or doing anything, because it could be taken from you at any moment.
In various cultures women must be escorted by a man or face punishment. This is accepted as a moral in these cultures therefore morals are not absolute.
No, that is a ritual, a tradition, in order to protect the morality of the woman. The moral is that no man shall have that woman until she is married. WHat you described is how they protect that moral.
That's not a moral. In cultures women cannot physically leave their home with her husband, or other male to walk with her. Your moral doesn't make sense in that instance. Well to protect the morals of women in this country we should institute a law that requires women to not leave the home unless escorted by a man?
I'm not the one claiming "gay sex is moral." You prove that. I have no cause to be on the defensive, which is more than you can say for a group of people a large segment of which knowingly engages in practices that they know will lead to fatal illness (i.e., AIDS), and who don't bother to check the provenance of babies and children they adopt (e.g., babies stolen by CPS). You prove you're moral; you're the one who needs to defend yourself, not me.
Any one who lives in a city knows that homos spend huge amounts of their time in bars getting drunk (and possibly doing drugs) and having sex - all ages, all the time. They couldn't give a damn about spreading disease, and they only want children because it's a celebrity fad and they think it gives them cache. They also like taking children from heterosexuals.
Okay, maybe not "all" the time, but obviously enough of the time to have created and perpetuated the worst disease known, that being AIDS. Quit playing the victim - people are getting tired of it. I couldn't care less what people do in privacy of their homes, but don't be teaching 5 year olds that homo sex is good.
The origin of AIDs actually stems from Africa. Your claim only further shows that you are intent on condemning a group of people regardless of your reasoning.
You confuse homosexual sex and homosexuality. These are to different things MSM can even include mainly heterosexual men, however, the idea that two men or women can love each other in the same way that a heterosexual couple does is no different than children discussing why their family may look different than others.
AIDS was spread by gays - regardless of where it came from, the epidemic was caused by gays who were having sex and drug fueld orgies. Are you actually going to deny that there is a large percentage of gays who are obsessed with sex? How come in every single city you can go to a seedy park or bathhouse or whatever and they'll be having sex like dogs? I know they are in the city I live in. And it's no different anywhere else, probably worse.
People got sucked in by the "tolerance" scam - wait until their children and grandchildren are getting kidnapped for gay "parents" - let's see how tolerant they are then. Wake up, people; it's already almost too late.
These tyrants won't be happy until every child is ripped from their heterosexual parents and given to homos. It's already happening - babies and children are being taken from heterosexual parents and given to gays. Gays LOVE destroying heterosexual families, especially Christian families.
what a sick bitch... unbelievable... this arrogant witch with a warped mind is now a tax sucking pig telling us what is moral - shit this president and admin have to go - RISE UP FOLKS... ENOUGH IS ENOUGH -THROW THE SHITS OUT!!!
The CDC has recently issued a report stating that gay & bi-sexual men are fifty(50) times more likely to contract HIV/Aids and all forms of Hepatitis. They have known for decades how Hiv/Aids is transmitted yet they keep on doing it at a record pace. Homos only care about having sick perverted sex, they care nothing about each other or society. The Red Cross won't even accept blood donations from them because there is too much risk in their blood having or carrying a contagious disease.
It's not that the Red Cross won't except it. They WANT to openly allow MSM's donate. They are restricted by the government. You should check your alleged "facts"
You homosexuals astound me... you think anyone who sees homosexuality for what it is must be a Christian. Common sense tells most that Homosexuality is SICK for a variety of reasons, the least of which comes from the Bible.
o...k... Jjjs14, so you are either one of those terribly insecure men who are terrified of challenging traditional gender rolls of male and female, of what is masculine or feminine. or you're just some rednecked bible-thumper.
Heterosexual sex is good. Sure it is. It fits within the laws of nature and results on continuation of the species. Anal sex breaks the laws of nature and only results in stink.
Head of EEOC??? Good luck America. I guess this is the Hope and Change Obama kept mentioning in the campaign but failed to give any specifics.
So Chai... we're all "units" .. and the family ideal is a political morality war. My advice, never get married.
westernciviliznation 1 week ago
This is the united states of whatever goes.
XBlackWolf10 1 month ago
Anyone who would nominate this extremist is not a Christian.
DeeJaeGrl 1 month ago
@JustAnotherGay96 yeah fecal freaks...not good for the booty over the long haul...again a "family" value. i could really give 2 burning shits about what two or more same sex people do in the privacy of their own home. but to try to influence in a public forum that packing fudge is wholesome and creative, that is another story.
jonesey5168 5 months ago
Comment removed
QuartuvLarry 1 year ago
getting plowed in the arse and then ingesting it is a family value in that wackjob's opinion...grosss
jonesey5168 1 year ago
Comment removed
QuartuvLarry 1 year ago
@istepharella You can join our barbeque, but do you think you'll be well received when you snap angrily at people who look askance at you for putting ice cream on your steak? Because that's kind of what you've done with me.
QuartuvLarry 1 year ago
@istepharella OK, ya blocked me. I feel so blocked. What I don't get is how you can't come to terms with the fact that not everyone is going to accept your lifestyle choices, or who you think you are. I really don't care if someone dislikes me. For example, I get called "evil" for my libertarian views of self-ownership. Now THOSE bastards would actually want to see me come to harm for my views. THAT'S bigotry! I really don't seek your destruction for your lifestyle. But I DO have an opinion.
QuartuvLarry 1 year ago
@istepharella OK, you like yours manufactured. That's fine. There's always a market for women who dislike naturally made dildos. Hey, I prefer natural tits to silicon, but I wouldn't expect that if you yourself had a boob job, you wouldn't be somewhat offended by that stated preference.
QuartuvLarry 1 year ago
@QuartuvLarry you have the right to be offended.
XBlackWolf10 1 month ago
@XBlackWolf10 Anyway, Chai (who names their kid after a tea?) is a raging looney, which would trump anything else she rages on.
QuartuvLarry 1 month ago
@istepharella That's your opinion. Which one of you secretly wants to be a man, though?
QuartuvLarry 1 year ago
@istepharella You have a right to your OWN property, and to your OWN self. But marriage involves legal binding to the property of OTHERS, so legality is more at issue than assumptions of the church. You shouldn't let your emotions make you so short-sighted. What good will that mean to you when your lover gets tired of experimenting with women and decides she wants to hook up with dudes again?
QuartuvLarry 1 year ago
@istepharella Oh please. I can appreciate art, but I happen to know where it belongs, in the tertiary sector of the market. Drawing doodles is what you do AFTER class, and AFTER all the real bread-winning chores are done.
Bigot? Once again, I'm not stopping you from deciding whom or what you want to rub your female parts on. That's the libertarian in me. Your feelings for someone ELSE does NOT elevate you to any kind of status, moral or otherwise. That's what makes Obastard's nominee wrong too.
QuartuvLarry 1 year ago
@istepharella Whores, eh? We can descend to that level of spite. That said, congratulations on being able to leave the trailer park. No doubt you now have enough money to pay the girl you love to pretend to love you back for the past 3 years.
QuartuvLarry 1 year ago
@istepharella Yes, they are raised without fathers all the time, and it's unfortunate. It's been shown that boys grow up to be thugs and girls into sluts. Hell, most of my high school bullies were fatherless trailer park spawn. Nature won't be denied; kids ALWAYS look up to and require patriarchal affirmation. Without a father, they'll just seek out the nearest male dominance. With boys, it's gangs, with girls, it's the first jerk that'll use her.
QuartuvLarry 1 year ago
@istepharella Well, beware judgment day yourself. It may not be what you expect. Just because you WANT something may not be reason enough to HAVE it. You really don't see the correlation of empires collapsing? Well...Rome actually DECLINED over years, but we'll collapse...and very soon. The ones that don't care are the ones I'm gathering ammo for. They'll be the ones without anything, and they'll try to take what I have.
Anyway, you can't properly raise a kid without a father. Sorry.
QuartuvLarry 1 year ago
@istepharella I won't make excuses for marital infidelity. I personally believe it's as amoral as gay sex. These things are not exclusive. Divorce and infidelity SHOULD have legal repercussions.
Anyway, with the coming economic collapse and resultant lawlessness of a new dark age, this will all soon become a non-issue again, save for the peculiar tastes of those in power who are rich enough to buy same-sex concubines. It happened with Rome, after all.
QuartuvLarry 1 year ago
@istepharella In what manner have I "shat" on your rights?
QuartuvLarry 1 year ago
@istepharella Yes it it. And I only imply what I think: that it's freakish. But I'm not going to demand that you stop. It's your choice how you live your life. You can have sex with whomever consenting adult you want, and I'll do nothing to stop it. There, you see? I tolerate it. And the only thing I did was give my opinion...we are, after all, entitled to our opinions.
QuartuvLarry 1 year ago
@istepharella I DID define tolerance correctly, because by my own tolerance, I have not accosted you in any way. Your attitude and what you think about my OPINION, be it aggravated or conciliatory, is YOUR responsibility. I can be as insensitive and tactless as I want, but if I'm not demanding that you think or speak a certain way, I'm still being tolerant.
QuartuvLarry 1 year ago
@istepharella You still seem to get the definition of tolerance mixed up with acceptance. Tolerance is tolerating the existence of another without trying to penalize, imprison, or kill them. Acceptance is doing the whole joining hands and singing kumbaya thing.
I'm not going to kill you, rob you, or throw you in jail. That makes me tolerant.
QuartuvLarry 1 year ago
@istepharella No. I won't ACCEPT gay for gayness sake. I'll TOLERATE it, though. There's a difference.
Honestly, I'm not passionate about it one way or the other, except where our military's concerned, since troop morale and cohesive efficiency is far more important than someone's activism.
QuartuvLarry 1 year ago
@istepharella Well, what can I say? I'm not an emotional woman. I don't blame the world for my design flaws (this part goes here, that part goes there...wait a minute the fitting parts are confusing to me!) and I certainly wouldn't attempt to attribute genetics to defer my proclivities.
QuartuvLarry 1 year ago
@istepharella Love is a word that means so many things that it's almost subjective in context. But it almost never means the same thing as lust. You can love a painting or a parent, but what kind of fetish makes you want to actually fuck either?
QuartuvLarry 1 year ago
@istepharella No child left behind IS a flop. And the Make-A-Wish Foundation is a private organization, created through the good will of like-minded individuals. It was never FORCED into being. There is no such thing as "forced charity" since the proper term is called "theft."
And it's not that gays are lesser; it's the insistence of institutionalizing a fetish.
QuartuvLarry 1 year ago
@istepharella One kid's problem is not the responsibility of the other kids. There is absolutely NO way that anyone can presume to legislate attitudes. And I see no reason for a society to bend over backwards to treat with the whimsy of a few who want to change the name of civil union to marriage.
QuartuvLarry 1 year ago
@istepharella Most of us see this for what it truly is: a Marxist intent to disrupt the nuclear family. The root view is that a family breeds a "patriarchal society" which leads to "fascism," or "capitalism" given current terms.
Yes, I'm sure you're not a total Marxist or a total socialist -whatever the case may be. But consider that you may be a mere stepping stone for those who are. And consider the ancient Greeks and Romans. Being gay was no big thing with them...but marriage was still hetero
QuartuvLarry 1 year ago
@istepharella Well, I find myself becoming more able to get along with you than the typical leftist. For one thing, I see no reason, gay or not, why someone shouldn't see another in the hospital.
But I don't see how marriage and adoption will help anything. Because, you see, everyone is entitled to their own opinion (when have either one of us last heard THAT before?) but NOBODY is entitled to happiness. Pursuit of it, yes, but entitlement? No. That can never be given by others.
QuartuvLarry 1 year ago
@istepharella Right, because any resistance to trying to institute a FETISH makes soooo many victims! And if you're "victim" enough, maybe you can get some free munnie!!! Gawd, how I despise entitlement whores!
QuartuvLarry 1 year ago
Gay sex must be good. It lets istepharella feel good about being bitched by other males.
forwardmover 1 year ago
@istepharella Does your mother know what you are doing?
forwardmover 1 year ago
(1) Homosexuality is an abomination
(2) Heterosexual sex is not morally good. Outside the confines of marriage heterosexual sex is FORNICATION! Married Heterosexual sex is morally good!
(3) No one should be attacking individuals who engage in homosexuality, we should all be attacking homosexuality!
SuperDude2569 1 year ago
Foreclosure and unemployment are way up. Iran is going nuclear. Let's talk about gay sex!!!! God have mercy on us all.
farrier616 1 year ago
Hopefully no government funds are going toward this loon.
forwardmover 1 year ago
If I have to listen to this completly stupid Bullsh!t much longer....
I will blow my stack....
Just....STFU, You Moronic Idiot!!!
lorrainegate 2 years ago
That stupid bitch actually thinks the government even deserves to tell us what;s "good?" She can just shut the fuck up!
QuartuvLarry 2 years ago
I don't care what adults do in the privacy of their own bed room. I don't want to know. As long as it doesn't involve kids , animal , rape or adultery. Why do we need to know that someone sexually gets off by way of gay sex. Keep such info in the bedroom.
computerpurple 2 years ago
The American public is not anti-homosexual. Just predjudiced racist, bigot evangelists.
luvguins 2 years ago
Perverted freaks.
onecelticwarrior 2 years ago
"strategically smart." good luck with that.. we really aren't that dumb
RestrainedNoMore 2 years ago 2
you know why? because "overpopulation"is deemed morally bad so more homosexual relationships which produce no children is morally good for the environment and the world.
There is a bigger agenda than the bs she is spouting
RestrainedNoMore 2 years ago
I dont think that the atmosphere is anti homosexual at all...I think that alot of laws past have been pro homosexuality...i think gat people fool themselves into thinking that they are not anti hetero...you just want to live your lives...the truth is that homosexuality would eventually cause an end to humanity if it where to be the standard...that is simply a fact...hope you have a chance to look at your argument for what it is...God bless...and you are loved.
indiahandy 2 years ago
India.. why you always gotta take the high road.. lol.. ok.. I'll try to be more like you... anyway.. we both know that the government is actually pro homosexual and that's where the problem lies.. see ya in a few.. lol
kiryoku25 2 years ago
Heterosexuality is perverted and immoral
devaloki 2 years ago
Comment removed
kiryoku25 2 years ago
@kiryoku25 so planned parenthood exists as a creation of heterosexuals to get rid of heterosexuals who desire to destroy their own babies because they hate heterosexuals ? lmao. you make no sense!
I've studied real history and not only that I see real world experience with how this anti-homosexual atmosphere produces negativity
devaloki 2 years ago
Comment removed
kiryoku25 2 years ago
@kiryoku25 Dude SIR the Church supported Hitler during WW2, i guess that is an un-convient fact for you
devaloki 2 years ago
Comment removed
kiryoku25 2 years ago
Comment removed
devaloki 2 years ago
Comment removed
kiryoku25 2 years ago
Comment removed
devaloki 2 years ago
Comment removed
kiryoku25 2 years ago
Comment removed
devaloki 2 years ago
Comment removed
kiryoku25 2 years ago
Comment removed
devaloki 2 years ago
Comment removed
kiryoku25 2 years ago
stop faking my account!
kiiryoku25 2 years ago
Comment removed
devaloki 2 years ago
Comment removed
devaloki 2 years ago
Comment removed
kiryoku25 2 years ago
Comment removed
devaloki 2 years ago
Comment removed
kiryoku25 2 years ago
Comment removed
devaloki 2 years ago
Comment removed
kiryoku25 2 years ago
Comment removed
kiryoku25 2 years ago
@kiryoku25 The world is overpopulated, why do we need people pushing for more babies either due to hetero-normality or religious reasons? I have a friend who is pregnant and wants to abort it but her parents won't let her because christ says no just as this christ asshole says no supposedly to homosexuality as well
devaloki 2 years ago
Comment removed
kiryoku25 2 years ago
@kiryoku25 I'm a girl.
But fuck Christ and your god anyway
devaloki 2 years ago
Comment removed
kiryoku25 2 years ago
@kiryoku25 what pic?
and misunderstood? misunderstood with what?
devaloki 2 years ago
um... your profile... lol
kiryoku25 2 years ago
@kiryoku25 whatever
devaloki 2 years ago
This jewbag 'Equal Opportunity Czar' is yet another cog in the wheels of Obama's plan to "fundamentally transform America". This is "change" and "hope" for you.
earlturner2 2 years ago 2
1 Corinthians 6:9
Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders
practicaljokes 2 years ago 2
I think that what is scary is how she discusses how to promote homosexuality in the culture. It is not what she said that is scary, it is that this is going on behind the scenes and she is one of the few with the courage to at least let us all know about it.
edwardsson 2 years ago
@edwardsson homosexuality SHOULD be promoted. heterosexuality should be stopped, we don't need more babies, and homosexuality will make people live more better
devaloki 2 years ago
Comment removed
kiryoku25 2 years ago
Comment removed
devaloki 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@kiryoku25 @kiryoku25 you know you've got to be the stupidest son of a bitch i've ever heard from. is it not the heterosexuals that are going to planned parenthood? so how do you make sense of anything you just said.
All I meant by my statement is that homosexuality should be promoted in society, that way people feel more comfortable expressing that.
devaloki 2 years ago
Oh dear me, I never knew that there was so little love in the world. Reading some of these comments makes me feel very sad and helpless.
Being gay is not a disease nor is it a 20th-century phenomenon. There have always been gay people in the world, and the percentage is not mounting. The only difference is that nowadays people dare to speak up for their rights. They are not trying to pervert anyone. They just want to pursuit their happiness, as everyone else does.
Please consider this.
Seehundmaulwurf 2 years ago
*pursue
Seehundmaulwurf 2 years ago
So true.
yehuda86 2 years ago
Ooh, scary, gay people are just as morally good as straight people!
Such a scary idea, oooooh!
She's right. Morality demands full equality for gay people.
KevinMossVT 2 years ago
Gobbledygook
D4ZZ4 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Ok a lot of people are wrong here! gay sex is niether wrong nor right! it is a completely nuetral act! It takes no sides! homosexuality itself is a completely neutral thing. Gay sex (behind closed doors, as well as straight sex) doesnt affect the well beings of any straight or gay person, unless that straight or gay person has issues to deal with themselves! Anyways I think most of you here are 100% wrong cus being gay and gay sex is nuetral completely!
sadguyfoundout1 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Not only is it good, but it's great! Amazing even.
snipzor 2 years ago
This woman is stupid. gay sex is a crime.
Derisa22 2 years ago 2
I have seen Him in the watch-fires of a hundred circling camps,
They have builded Him an altar in the evening dews and damps;
I can read His righteous sentence by the dim and flaring lamps:
His day is marching on.
oneblessedmom83 2 years ago
What a Obama-nation contradiction!!!
oneblessedmom83 2 years ago
Johns Hopkins University and the Albert Einstein School of Medicine already proved that no one is born "gay" it is a result of emotional, environmental & psychological influences. But you never heard that because the affluent wealthy gay community makes sure no one becomes informed. I will tell you one thing:I will never allow these sick reprobates to brainwash & pervert my children, which is a huge goal of theirs.
Stand up America. Fight for our nation! We are becoming a moral cesspool.
Jane5828 2 years ago 3
Could you please cite this claim about proof? Also I doubt that they claimed to "prove" this because in science there are very few things that are absolutely proved especially in psychological and medical fields.
coolthomas2011 2 years ago
i agree say it like it is!God almightys got something called fire and brimstone for this activity.
stevo5806 2 years ago
I agree with you Jane5828. Would that more Americans would rise up and stand against this perverted, nasty stuff. The gays push and push to put their sex lives in everyone's faces. Let's send them a message. That we're not interested in their filthy, twisted ways.
tim23z 2 years ago
She says "How can we do this that is strategically smart?" If gay sex is so positive and normal, why would you need any strategy???? Where on earth do the democrats dig up these perverts from??
Jane5828 2 years ago
college campusus,where else?also hollywood movies loaded with there immoral crap perverted a generation!
stevo5806 2 years ago
the streets of San Fran
RestrainedNoMore 2 years ago
When was it exactly that the disease of homosexuality became normal behavior?
As Obama-nation continues to de-construct the very moral fiber of this country we can only hope that reversal of this degeneracy and human blight can be reversed once we kick him and his socialist team out of here...2012.
Reading news today is a journey into the abyss. Heal homosexuals...don't encourage them.
SensibleFella 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Heal bigotry open your mind....
coolthomas2011 2 years ago
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Derisa22 2 years ago
this is dissapointing...just Morally and ethically dissapointing..
nelson101st 2 years ago 2
She and the whole Obama administration is a train wreck waiting to happen.
mindtickler 2 years ago 2
yeah wat she said! :)
Jardinami 2 years ago
Listen to the way she spits out "heterosexual sex." These so-called gays (who are actually the opposite of "gay" - i.e., vicious as hell) DESPISE heterosexuality and all it represents. Homos see themselves as terribly wronged victims, victims of heterosexuality. They will be happy only when they have made any expression of heterosexuality illegal (except the creation of children for them), take all your children and give them to homosexuals, and utterly destroy society as we know it.
CPSSucks 2 years ago
"Those negroes won't be happy until all of them have five white families working for them....."
This is the equivalent to what you said. Why do you really feel this way there must be some reason you hate orphans and want to increase the amount of children that don't have any sort of parents.
You more so than any religious zealot have said the most despicable things and should realize what you are saying.
coolthomas2011 2 years ago
coolthomas, "negroes" as you put it (I didn't put it, you did), aren't forcing children as young as 5 years old to learn about homosexual sex. In fact, most blacks are clued in to the homo agenda and realize that the homo propaganda that claims "gay is the new black" is just b.s. Blacks, for the most part, are repulsed by homosexuality.
CPSSucks 2 years ago
You are seriously misrepresenting the facts when you are talking about 5 year-old children. Showing children that there are different types of families and who makes up these families is not teaching children about gay sex.
"Blacks" as you called them are no more repulsed by homosexuality as a whole than other groups. There are religious people who are more likely to have an issue with homosexuality because of their religious beliefs.
coolthomas2011 2 years ago
Coolthomas2011 - blacks are indeed repulsed by homosexualtiy, and pissed off that homos pretend that they share the same civil rights violations history.
And 5 year olds ARE being taught about gay sex - including "transgenders." Homos are a big part of the New World Order, however you construe that. They represent the demise of the family, and foundation of civilization. The only way homos can "reproduce" without huge expense, is by accepting the babies and children that CPS steals.
CPSSucks 2 years ago
Child Protective Services is where your problem apparently lies. I'm not positive about this, but I'm pretty sure that heterosexual couples receive children from them as well. I'm also pretty sure that if you had it your way you would rather a child stay in an abusive home with a heterosexual couple rather than live with a homosexual couple because without CPS who would have help children in unsafe home environments.
coolthomas2011 2 years ago
Okay, well it's nice that you can read my thoughts.
CPSSucks 2 years ago
Well that's what you are implying with your statements.
coolthomas2011 2 years ago
There are African Americans who feel both ways, don't try and deny that. Coretta Scott King, wife of the late Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, a leader in the Civil Rights Movement 40 years ago, was a huge supporter of gay rights and same-sex marriage.
She compared the present struggle of the LGBT community to that of African Americans only a few decades ago.
coolthomas2011 2 years ago
No, blacks are not interested in gay rights.
CPSSucks 2 years ago
And as a Mexican-American, my only interests are washing dishes and not knowing English.
coolthomas2011 2 years ago
Wow. This is ridiculous! And totally not true!
daughterandlover 2 years ago
"t's not that the Red Cross won't except it. They WANT to openly allow MSM's donate. They are restricted by the government."
The FACT is the red cross won't accept blood from gays, the government does that to protect the blood supply from Gay blood.... my facts are correct, you should check yours coolthomas2011
Jjjs14 2 years ago
No your facts are not...There is a big difference between the words can't and won't. The Red Cross, America's Blood Centers, and AABB have all urged the FDA to reevaluate THEIR policy. The Red Cross has to follow FDA rules.
coolthomas2011 2 years ago
Wake up people, homos won't be happy until heterosexuality is outlawed, all your children have been adopted by them, and sex with children is legal and celebrated. Watch my video on Frank Lombard - homos are hiding the real truth from you.
CPSSucks 2 years ago
Barack Obama I hope both your daughters turn out to be GAY. That way you want have any grandkids. Sasha & Malia be sure you run out and find you a girl friend to hitch up with as you grow up, if you want mommy and daddy proud of you. You have to go against Gods will, and whatever is immoral to be a real Obama.
VLMarlow 2 years ago
LMarlow, even if Obama's daughters aren't gay, their children could very well be stolen by CPS and given to homos. Where do people think gays "children" come from? It is much easier and cheaper to steal children than to get artificial insem.
CPSSucks 2 years ago
Yay! Let's just all CELEBRATE those hotspot mattresses listed on craigslist, where AIDS is transmitted, in front of little Billy and Susie Smith, or at the Faire, or wherever, because our government says its good, in the face of our God.
I'm NOT with those "folks", God!
(Barack Obama= Antichrist)
xistntial 2 years ago
OK what did he prove: he would fired a person and hired one lesbian, to replace another employee which already was doing the job.Isn't that reverse discrimination? How can it be called Equal Employment Opportunity when you are hired only because of your Sexual orientation? I want to see equal rights not the reverse side of it. That's like saying I'll show you Your Sexual Preference should not have a barren on any job. Unless you are a child molester, or sex pervert.
VLMarlow 2 years ago
Heterosexual is good because it produces children. Homosexuality does not.
VonHelton 2 years ago
VonHelton, not only does homosexuality NOT produce children, it destroys children and families. It is an absolute fact that CPS is stealing children from good parents. It is also an absolute fact that CPS gives these children to homosexuals. It is also an absolute fact that these children get raped, in foster "care" and when they are adopted. The homo dominated media won't report it though, but the foster children will tell you the truth.
CPSSucks 2 years ago
Comment removed
coolthomas2011 2 years ago
More of your unsupported lies.
coolthomas2011 2 years ago
another Zionist promoting fag sex... excuse me... they also are behind the entire Gay Rights movement too... Homosexuality is a brainchild of family destroying Zionist agendas.
anutarasamyat 2 years ago
Here's my real beef though:
"A primary goal of the homosexual agenda is to promote the lifestyle in public schools. This occurred quickly and intensely after gay marriage was imposed in Massachusetts, where homosexual relationships are taught to children as young as kindergartners, as recounted by the decision of Parker v. Hurley.[4] " Wikipedia
CPSSucks 2 years ago
First, that's from conservapedia not wikipedia.
If you were to actually read the link in your quote, a book that showed different types of families is not promoting homosexuality.
That would be that same as not showing interracial couples because some parents may object to that.
Where would parental control of schools end?
You can't teach about WWII because Timmy's parents are Holocaust deniers. Think about what schools would be like if everything had to be approved by all parents.
coolthomas2011 2 years ago
This lady, sorry, woman, keeps spouting off about "moral values". She hasn't got a clue what morals are!!!
Yes, sex brings intimacy in a relationship, however, it needs to be a moral relationship. Morals "used" to be defined by biblical terms, however, today they are based on "man's" interpretation, which is based on what personal wants and desires, no absolute.
Tolerance is for those that want others to tolerate their immoral behaviour.
hcciam 2 years ago
Morals existed long before the Bible.
coolthomas2011 2 years ago
so did man's stubbornness, greed and willfulness.
The bible only put into words what was already there before.
hcciam 2 years ago
That may be, but that's not what you stated. Using the Bible to define your personal morals is fine, but what about those that don't believe in the Bible?
You have a right to your personal beliefs, but you cannot force your beliefs upon others.
Also you say you are against immoral relationships, so why are there not groups of people who are vigorously working to criminalize sex out of wedlock or single parents?
coolthomas2011 2 years ago
Homos want to force their beliefs on others. As in 5 year olds.
CPSSucks 2 years ago
You're right about sex out of wedlock. We should have. However, if a couple lives together, they are considered married under common law, man and woman. Common law does not recognise same sex unions. Legal law does.
If you don't believe in the law of gravity, I won't force my "belief on you if you want to jump off a cliff, unless of course I want to save your life.
Morals are absolutes, have been, are and will be, whether you believe them or not. You don't have to believe in them to make
hcciam 2 years ago
true.
We have a right to choose what we believe.
Choose wisely. Both sides can't be right. There is no gray area.
The Obama admin has an agenda for change, its not going to be a good change.
hcciam 2 years ago
By saying that you are claiming to know the future. This means that you know of God's plan, and therefore you are considering yourself a prophet. Hmmm...isn't there something in the Bible about self-proclaimed prophets
coolthomas2011 2 years ago
I can predict the future based on history, someone's actions, and knowing basic truths.
I don't need to be a prophet, don't proclaim to be one. Based on where he is leading, it doesn't look good.
If I see someone running towards a cliff, I don't need to be a prophet to see something bad about to happen
hcciam 2 years ago
"I can predict the future based on history, someone's actions, and knowing basic truths."
You say you can PREDICT the future. Christians believe God is the only one who knows what will happen. God can tell his plans to prophets. You therefore claim you are a prophet. This is what you just said think about your actual statement prior to making it.
Say someone jumps from a cliff, there is a chance that they won't fall; it's not a high probability, but it does exist as a probability.
coolthomas2011 2 years ago
Oh come on now. Thought you were intelligent.
Quit playing the child games with semantics.
Lots of people knew Hitler was evil, they were just wise men who could read the signs.
Weather people can predict the weather based on the signs.
They aren't prophets.
hcciam 2 years ago
Morality is not absolute, if that was the case everyone would all agree on all morals. Therefore it cannot be an absolute.
coolthomas2011 2 years ago
No, everyone won't agree. You forget there is greed, pride, and selfishness. People want what they want and they are going to get it.
Would you agree that murder and robbery is absolutely wrong? Someone robs a bank and shoots 10 unarmed people in the process. Well, that person didn't believe in that moral. Still doesn't make it right.
Morals apply to ALL, whether you agree or not. There are always consequences to going against basic morals.
hcciam 2 years ago
However, you are FREE to choose to live your life according to whatever you choose to believe.
Again, choose wisely.
There are a LOT of differing beliefs out there.
If you just want to be happy, pick one and live it, no one will bother you.
If you want to stand for truth, be prepared to take a lot of heat.
hcciam 2 years ago
While I personally feel it's wrong, there is a legal, logical reasoning for murder and robbery being illegal. If murder was legal there would be no structure to our society because everyone would be afraid of being killed. Robbery is illegal because if it was legal there would be no point in owning or doing anything, because it could be taken from you at any moment.
coolthomas2011 2 years ago
Yeah, what's your point. If morals aren't absolute, then if you can't defend yourself, too bad. Might makes right. Who's to say its wrong.
Sure there would be structure. It just wouldn't be based on the peaceful lives we have today.
Hitler had lots of structure. It was damned scary, but it was structure.
We count freedom as an absolute, that's why so many died to keep it.
Morals are absolute, but when it inhibits someone's bedroom activities, look out.
hcciam 2 years ago
Just curious, maybe you know.
AS far as I know, Jews, Muslims, Pakistani, Philippines, most races find homosexuality immoral, except for our "enlightened civilized" society.
Were there/Are there any tribes in Africa, any small island, native americans, that found it moral? any where it was openly practiced and accepted?
hcciam 2 years ago
In various cultures women must be escorted by a man or face punishment. This is accepted as a moral in these cultures therefore morals are not absolute.
coolthomas2011 2 years ago
No, that is a ritual, a tradition, in order to protect the morality of the woman. The moral is that no man shall have that woman until she is married. WHat you described is how they protect that moral.
BTW, good diversion.
hcciam 2 years ago
That's not a moral. In cultures women cannot physically leave their home with her husband, or other male to walk with her. Your moral doesn't make sense in that instance. Well to protect the morals of women in this country we should institute a law that requires women to not leave the home unless escorted by a man?
coolthomas2011 2 years ago
Moral people oppose immorality.
CPSSucks 2 years ago
Prove you are moral. Prove anyone is immoral.
coolthomas2011 2 years ago
I'm not the one claiming "gay sex is moral." You prove that. I have no cause to be on the defensive, which is more than you can say for a group of people a large segment of which knowingly engages in practices that they know will lead to fatal illness (i.e., AIDS), and who don't bother to check the provenance of babies and children they adopt (e.g., babies stolen by CPS). You prove you're moral; you're the one who needs to defend yourself, not me.
CPSSucks 2 years ago
Does a mattress in the woods, by a pulloff, and listed on Craig'slist, count as "someone's bedroom"?
xistntial 2 years ago
Any one who lives in a city knows that homos spend huge amounts of their time in bars getting drunk (and possibly doing drugs) and having sex - all ages, all the time. They couldn't give a damn about spreading disease, and they only want children because it's a celebrity fad and they think it gives them cache. They also like taking children from heterosexuals.
CPSSucks 2 years ago
I hope you are being sarcastic, because this is a blatant lie.
Although, here are some things that you may also agree with:
All Asians are awful drivers and good at math.
All Black people are criminals.
All White people are either white collar criminals or rednecks.
All Hispanics are illegal immigrants.
All Catholic priest rape alter boys.
All Jewish people are great accountants and have big noses.
All Muslims are terrorists
Aren't gross generalizations just great.
coolthomas2011 2 years ago
Okay, maybe not "all" the time, but obviously enough of the time to have created and perpetuated the worst disease known, that being AIDS. Quit playing the victim - people are getting tired of it. I couldn't care less what people do in privacy of their homes, but don't be teaching 5 year olds that homo sex is good.
CPSSucks 2 years ago
The origin of AIDs actually stems from Africa. Your claim only further shows that you are intent on condemning a group of people regardless of your reasoning.
You confuse homosexual sex and homosexuality. These are to different things MSM can even include mainly heterosexual men, however, the idea that two men or women can love each other in the same way that a heterosexual couple does is no different than children discussing why their family may look different than others.
coolthomas2011 2 years ago
AIDS was spread by gays - regardless of where it came from, the epidemic was caused by gays who were having sex and drug fueld orgies. Are you actually going to deny that there is a large percentage of gays who are obsessed with sex? How come in every single city you can go to a seedy park or bathhouse or whatever and they'll be having sex like dogs? I know they are in the city I live in. And it's no different anywhere else, probably worse.
CPSSucks 2 years ago
Are you going to deny that there are large group of PEOPLE in general obsessed with sex? We are sexual beings.
How are strip clubs any worse in nature? It's all about sex or at least the idea of sex.
The percentage of MSM AIDs cases has decreased, while the percentage of high-risk heterosexual cases has increased.
Allowing gay people to marry would instill an idea of monogamy.
coolthomas2011 2 years ago
People got sucked in by the "tolerance" scam - wait until their children and grandchildren are getting kidnapped for gay "parents" - let's see how tolerant they are then. Wake up, people; it's already almost too late.
CPSSucks 2 years ago
These tyrants won't be happy until every child is ripped from their heterosexual parents and given to homos. It's already happening - babies and children are being taken from heterosexual parents and given to gays. Gays LOVE destroying heterosexual families, especially Christian families.
CPSSucks 2 years ago
what a sick bitch... unbelievable... this arrogant witch with a warped mind is now a tax sucking pig telling us what is moral - shit this president and admin have to go - RISE UP FOLKS... ENOUGH IS ENOUGH -THROW THE SHITS OUT!!!
Baadj5 2 years ago
The CDC has recently issued a report stating that gay & bi-sexual men are fifty(50) times more likely to contract HIV/Aids and all forms of Hepatitis. They have known for decades how Hiv/Aids is transmitted yet they keep on doing it at a record pace. Homos only care about having sick perverted sex, they care nothing about each other or society. The Red Cross won't even accept blood donations from them because there is too much risk in their blood having or carrying a contagious disease.
Jjjs14 2 years ago
It's not that the Red Cross won't except it. They WANT to openly allow MSM's donate. They are restricted by the government. You should check your alleged "facts"
coolthomas2011 2 years ago
You homosexuals astound me... you think anyone who sees homosexuality for what it is must be a Christian. Common sense tells most that Homosexuality is SICK for a variety of reasons, the least of which comes from the Bible.
Jjjs14 2 years ago
o...k... Jjjs14, so you are either one of those terribly insecure men who are terrified of challenging traditional gender rolls of male and female, of what is masculine or feminine. or you're just some rednecked bible-thumper.
MrRockythesquirrel 2 years ago
She's a kook no matter how to slice it.
Heterosexual sex is good. Sure it is. It fits within the laws of nature and results on continuation of the species. Anal sex breaks the laws of nature and only results in stink.
Head of EEOC??? Good luck America. I guess this is the Hope and Change Obama kept mentioning in the campaign but failed to give any specifics.
This is downright disgusting.
dmfdmf1 2 years ago 4