If you were to do this, the frequency picked up by the aerial would have to match the frequency of the whole device. One could use an impedance, or spark gap as in "Device for the Utilization of Radiant Energy" to power the device. If you get a good aerial going with a good ground, I hear you can really get a spark gap roaring.
@tortuga0303 yes, your device is basically a Tesla radiant energy transmitter, with tuned coils that resonate at a certain frequency. You could just as easily tune your device to optimise a certain frequency.
This seems to me a version of Teslas magnifying transformer or I am wrong. You probably calculated the resonant f of the secondary in relation to input f?
I wish you would post more often, as you are one of few that are approaching the subject scientifically, making it clear for novices.
Yes very similar. You could calculate the resonant F, and you want input to match. Every thing you change however, primary, pick up etc changes the whole tone of the device. Change anything, and you have a different sweet spot. I will try to post more, if you have questions message me and I will answer.
You could also say this is an impedance matching transformer. It transfers energy, but does not create it, but the concept of how it works is useful in understanding circuits that do not rely solely on conduction.
I tought it is not relying on conduction. As I understand this circuit, we have one stationary wave or odd multiple. What do you think is a mechanism that manipulates the field in and arround the secondary. When we have conduction, there must be something in the wire that puts in motion the electricity, being electrons or whatever, but in this secondary what we got is a pulsating stationary wave, which when in resonance needs very little energy to mantain the action which can be very powerful..
I would say that in a proper circuit, there is both conduction and induction. In fact each successive winding on a coil, induces onto its neighbor, this gives it inductance, so conduction is a product of induction, and vice versa, both need be present, but most circuits only take advantage of conduction.
Also, what happens if you move the second primary ( with the load) up and down and when calculating the resonant f, do you take in account one primary or both?
This depends on what resonant mode you are running the coil in, the best way to find resonnance is to hunt for it. Change your setup however you want, then sweep with the signal gen to find the maximum response by your near by scope probe, you will learn a ton doing this exercise.
I guess the main point of this is to show that the secondary, with the long fine windings, has capacitance between the windings and thus although it is open circuit, it acts like a closed circuit secondary when the capacitance and inductance, of that secondary, reach minimal resistance at resonant frequency.
I think this is so because normally we expect the secondary to be shorted or else the third, far left coil would not have any induced electric flow, like a transformer. I like it.
Hello,tortuga!, why haven't you been doing more of your videos> Or is it I am not looking in the right spots,, anyway I just noticed that two months ago you didn't know Luc which is short for gotoluc, he is quite impreeive and really tired of me wriiing and takeing up HIS time with all my questions,,got to leave him alone for awhile LOL.
I really enjoy ALL of These videos, but have dialup only real slow dwnldg! Luc sent me a video afew wks back to help me out with his vids on them ,,nice guy
Hello, I have not posted much more because I have been very busy. I suggest reading everything you can on the subject, Hans Jenny and other resonance greats. if you still have direct questions send em my way.
Ah, you want the holy grail? my goal is not to prove overunity, my goal is to help people understand a more fundamental form of energy. Resonance governs our lives, its time we learned to engineer around it.
You are a fool Luc for blocking me. Tell me that you haven't read hundreds and hundreds of postings made by me trying to help out people doing stuff on YouTube. Where is your backbone?
Aaron posted an "educatonal" clip about coils on YouTube about two years ago and when I found it I challenged him on it. It was on principle, it was supposed to be an educational clip. Guess what Luc, after he got kicked off YT and then came back, he reposted and got it right. I was just in challenging him.
I was going to help you. Unfortunately Luc, Rosemary's circuit does nothing, it's anoter classic case of not understanding what's going. Both the OU thread and the Energetic Forum thread are dead ends. None of you right now understand how an inductor works, and Rosemary is blocking out some critical facts. You are doing the same thing to me. You let yourself become Aarons' flunky by blocking me. Your choice, be a man.
'tortuga' , if I could bother you with another question; is the signal generator powering the loads and also the lamp in the input impedance test?
Or are you using an amplifier?
Nabo00o 1 year ago
can you connet it to an aerial and tune that as your your power source?
MattBlytheTheOne 2 years ago
If you were to do this, the frequency picked up by the aerial would have to match the frequency of the whole device. One could use an impedance, or spark gap as in "Device for the Utilization of Radiant Energy" to power the device. If you get a good aerial going with a good ground, I hear you can really get a spark gap roaring.
tortuga0303 2 years ago
@tortuga0303 yes, your device is basically a Tesla radiant energy transmitter, with tuned coils that resonate at a certain frequency. You could just as easily tune your device to optimise a certain frequency.
MattBlytheTheOne 2 years ago
@MattBlytheTheOne ...Yes that is the point. what is interesting is the impedance matching possibilities.
tortuga0303 2 years ago
Hi.
This seems to me a version of Teslas magnifying transformer or I am wrong. You probably calculated the resonant f of the secondary in relation to input f?
I wish you would post more often, as you are one of few that are approaching the subject scientifically, making it clear for novices.
Thanks
bbojbboj 2 years ago
Yes very similar. You could calculate the resonant F, and you want input to match. Every thing you change however, primary, pick up etc changes the whole tone of the device. Change anything, and you have a different sweet spot. I will try to post more, if you have questions message me and I will answer.
tortuga0303 2 years ago
You could also say this is an impedance matching transformer. It transfers energy, but does not create it, but the concept of how it works is useful in understanding circuits that do not rely solely on conduction.
tortuga0303 2 years ago
I tought it is not relying on conduction. As I understand this circuit, we have one stationary wave or odd multiple. What do you think is a mechanism that manipulates the field in and arround the secondary. When we have conduction, there must be something in the wire that puts in motion the electricity, being electrons or whatever, but in this secondary what we got is a pulsating stationary wave, which when in resonance needs very little energy to mantain the action which can be very powerful..
bbojbboj 2 years ago
I would say that in a proper circuit, there is both conduction and induction. In fact each successive winding on a coil, induces onto its neighbor, this gives it inductance, so conduction is a product of induction, and vice versa, both need be present, but most circuits only take advantage of conduction.
tortuga0303 2 years ago
Also, what happens if you move the second primary ( with the load) up and down and when calculating the resonant f, do you take in account one primary or both?
And thank you for a response..
bbojbboj 2 years ago
This depends on what resonant mode you are running the coil in, the best way to find resonnance is to hunt for it. Change your setup however you want, then sweep with the signal gen to find the maximum response by your near by scope probe, you will learn a ton doing this exercise.
tortuga0303 2 years ago
I guess the main point of this is to show that the secondary, with the long fine windings, has capacitance between the windings and thus although it is open circuit, it acts like a closed circuit secondary when the capacitance and inductance, of that secondary, reach minimal resistance at resonant frequency.
I think this is so because normally we expect the secondary to be shorted or else the third, far left coil would not have any induced electric flow, like a transformer. I like it.
definitionofis 2 years ago
Hello,tortuga!, why haven't you been doing more of your videos> Or is it I am not looking in the right spots,, anyway I just noticed that two months ago you didn't know Luc which is short for gotoluc, he is quite impreeive and really tired of me wriiing and takeing up HIS time with all my questions,,got to leave him alone for awhile LOL.
I really enjoy ALL of These videos, but have dialup only real slow dwnldg! Luc sent me a video afew wks back to help me out with his vids on them ,,nice guy
Eddlipton 2 years ago
Hello, I have not posted much more because I have been very busy. I suggest reading everything you can on the subject, Hans Jenny and other resonance greats. if you still have direct questions send em my way.
tortuga0303 2 years ago
What are you talking about man??? Luc? Who is that? I am totally lost.
tortuga0303 2 years ago
Not in this video
tortuga0303 2 years ago
Hi,
could you try to build a selfrunning circuit
with a low power oscillator powering your primary and the secondary charging up a big cap which will power the primary oscillator ?
Great videos ! Keep them coming.
Regards, Stefan.
overunitydotcom 3 years ago
Ah, you want the holy grail? my goal is not to prove overunity, my goal is to help people understand a more fundamental form of energy. Resonance governs our lives, its time we learned to engineer around it.
tortuga0303 3 years ago
Great video! What are the ends of the secondary connected to?
codygillespie 3 years ago
nothing! it is not a traditional circuit through and through, there is no return path, could be considered an "open" path
tortuga0303 3 years ago
Excellent video,Thx for the input
-gmeatdaddy
gmeatdaddy 3 years ago
Great demo! Thanks!
Jetijs 3 years ago
Thank you tortuga0303 for this new video. Excellent video demonstration and information.
Thanks for sharing
Luc
gotoluc 3 years ago
You are a fool Luc for blocking me. Tell me that you haven't read hundreds and hundreds of postings made by me trying to help out people doing stuff on YouTube. Where is your backbone?
Aaron posted an "educatonal" clip about coils on YouTube about two years ago and when I found it I challenged him on it. It was on principle, it was supposed to be an educational clip. Guess what Luc, after he got kicked off YT and then came back, he reposted and got it right. I was just in challenging him.
Drevtoobe 2 years ago
I was going to help you. Unfortunately Luc, Rosemary's circuit does nothing, it's anoter classic case of not understanding what's going. Both the OU thread and the Energetic Forum thread are dead ends. None of you right now understand how an inductor works, and Rosemary is blocking out some critical facts. You are doing the same thing to me. You let yourself become Aarons' flunky by blocking me. Your choice, be a man.
Drevtoobe 2 years ago
Please stop littering my video with this chat.
tortuga0303 2 years ago
I am not luc
tortuga0303 2 years ago
WHO are you and why are you being so vicious with your attacks on these good people? BACKBONE? Where is yours and where are you chump?
Eddlipton 2 years ago