@liveAk47 даже у знаменитых людей заслуживающих уважение есть много ненавистников а ты вообще всего лишь жалкая единица толпы как и все... с какой стати тебе должны быть рады здесь если ты ничего полезного не сделаешь а как и все родился, вырос, отдашь физический труд за деньги на которые сможешь существовать, будешь думать что крут, оставишь такое же бесполезное потомство и отправишься на тот свет... если тебе тут должны быть рады то и всем и каждому в этом мире...
try ramming you're head into the metal dashboards of the pre 1960's cars and you will wish you were ramming your head into the hard plastic of your 80's car!!!!!!!!!!!!
Lol at 4:06-4:08 How that guy didn't die from whiplash is beyond me...
Also liked the bit that cars have "modern safety features" like padded dashes WTF!? I had a 90' Park Avenue similar to the first car shown crashing and the dash was hard as hell
Not culturally. On the calendar it is, but the "80s" as is thought of by the mainstream was more of 1982-1992. 1980 was in the 80s technically, but it is often identified as having more "70s" trends.
how god damn stuåid can ypu be when yoou dont put on your belt, really.... I hear you ahve ltos of problems in america even nowadays with people dont buckling up.
thin air LOL, but look at some of these 3pt seat belts, my dad has a '78 Camaro and it has 3pt. belts but the damn things don't have any tensioners so whats the point of the upper part of the belt?, that's what I was referring to.
really? my '94 Jimmy doesn't seem to have tensioners (seatbelts don't lock when you yank on them), but when you slam on the brakes or get in an accident they lock up. Maybe your camaro did the same?
That´s my problem with reasoning for total individual freedom when it comes to things like public safety. "Public" is the hey word because we are never alone on the roads when we go for a ride. It´s an organized chaos.
If two cars hit eachother at 100km/h the chances of leaving the wrecks with just bruises are low.
A small fairly modern car are often better than an old larger one but like you said in a bad accident that could be a theoretical question.
A practical question to your idea however is if you carpool with someone who´s not wearing a seatbelt or the other way around and you have an accident. Who´s responsible if one is thrown around the car and ends up injuring or killing the other passengers?
That´s an interesting point. The media rarely mentions if a person was useing the seatbelt. But in those cases where they do and also shows pictures and descriptions of the accident the crash happened at very high speeds and/or against other speeding cars, trucks or rocks that the chances of survival were very slim despite impactzones, air-bags and seatbelts.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
i guess i'm a dummy, cause the seat belt laws are a big pile of BULL$#!+ and it violates my right to choose. i guess before long our flag will have a star, and sickle.
I would imagine it will be you splatterd all over the road after you went through the windscreen before the soviet flag is raised. Think of what your saying...!
that may be true, but it just burns me to the core, that sooo much is wrong with our system that needs to be focused on, and they have to waste time and our money to pass stupid laws like this one, yet our taxes are keeping people like Charles Manson alive in jail, when they could have given that useless waste of a soul the electric chair back in the 60's. I can't understand what they get out of having that control over us, so really, I ask What next. Are they gonna take our classic cars away
I try not to let it get to me, but I tend to lean ttowards the small cars, and if the wreck is very sevier, then being confined in my car is just going to insure my death, with no chance at all being thrown from my car. Notice how you never hear the news say that people wearing their seatbelts that are killed in a wreck "The victim was wearing his/her seat belt"? No, they say "The driver/passenger was killed" BUT! DON'T wear a seat belt, the story will be followed by a lesson on seat belt safety
...and the courts are where the system is messed up. Do you think they really care about you, are the going to all funerals of victims killed that were wearing their seat belts?...I think it's just about revenue, and control
Seat belts work...you shoudn't need to choose. You make it sound like communism or socalism... which aren't totally bad systems. They work very well in some countrys. Charitys are distrubute wealth...
True seatbelts work, but there has also been studies that seatbelts along w/airbags can be more dangerous than belts, or bags alone. I came up with that theory years before I saw it on the news. (wish I'd said something) The airbag is designed to catch you like a ball glove, so when the belt stop at it's limit, here comes a 200mph slap in the face. OUCH! (had it happen). but really, making laws to wear belts?, fingerprint for drivers license? What's next? Too much control to be called free
It´s common knowledge that airbags are to be used with belts. Hitting just an airbag will probably break your neck. It has to be fully inflated just to be used. Safety features are designed to function within speed limits. Drive into a rock at 150km/h and it´s just a question what kills you. You might get lucky and be thrown out and land in United Inflatable Castles backyard sale.
Idividual freedom is an important thing. But with your reasoning you would also have to accept the fact that other private citizens, government and insurance should be able to use the same reasoning. If you were to be injured or handicaped in an accident (even one where you isn´t responsible) because you didn´t wear a belt. They could simply say "No fucking money for a wheelchair to him, it was his choice not to wear a belt."
I can understand that there are many angles to look at this, but to make it LAW "You Have To Do This" to me is just wrong. I prefer to drive small cars myself, which in a really bad wreck the cance of survival is slim. Wearing a seatbelt in this event would just insure my death. The really sad thing about it all, is that the news wouldn't say a damn thing that the person killed was wearing his seatbelt. Just "The driver was killed", but you'd damn sure hear it if not wearing one.
when you have to go only a couple of miles from your place... what happens if a drunk guy comes across you, fast, and hits you? you think you'll be fine "because you didn't have to go far"?
In my job, I see accidents every day, and most are not in places where people drive fast, like highways. They happen mostly in the cities where you come across people who "don't have to go far"
Riiiiight. Ok, nevermind. I'm sure that GM would show their product in an honest light, no matter what, because that's what large corporations do. Honesty is number one, self promotion is waaay down the list. Yu huh.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I know somebody that was in a crash and they said if he was wearing a seatbelt, he would have gotten killed. I have to wear a seatbelt because I slide everywhere whenever I make a turn because I have the leather seats. I would have gotten cloth seats to help prevent that sliding but, they are not heated.
in most accidents if you dont wear the belt you fly out from the car and die for sure...i have read about several accidents where ppl died because they didnt wear the belt.
First, learn proper English! Second, Toyota is not number one alone, they have the same number as GM. Third, some of the cars you named are not available in the US. Toyota, Honda, and Nissan have some of the most popular sedans; however when it comes to SUVs, and Trucks, American brand still has the edge. Finally, Toyota, Honda and Nissan are made in the states. It's noteworthy to mention that many of the "Japanese" cars are built in cooperation with General Motors (Suzuki, Subaru, and Toyota)
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Yup wear seatbelts and you will never ever die. It's funny, "saved lives" eventually die. Are they really saved? If in a crash you survive that particular incident.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Unfair liberal crash safety, fuel economy laws and unions have resulted in increased costs which have made American cars uncompetitive, unaffordable, unprofitable and undesireable. Lets go back to free economics and let the market decide who should win. Voluntary corporate changes are always more manageable and fair than government mandated changes. Vote NO to loss. Vote YES to jobs.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
When people close to my have died in unsafe cars I didn't blame it on somebody else. I didn't blame it on automakers. I didn't blame it on politics. I took personal responsibility and assumed it was GOD who decided to take them. When you have faith in the Lord you don't need seatbelts.
Wow, that Oldsmobile 98 and Pontiac Grand AM did pretty well in the crashes. I guess that's because cars today hit offset barriers (only about 40% of the car's frontal portion is impacted) and its a much tougher test than hitting a wall with the full front of the car.
I use to own this car really safe hit a SUV at 60 MPH had seetbelt on only a cut leg
homelifehome 9 months ago
is that garfield
RogerHerhard 10 months ago
Russia FOREVER
liveAk47 1 year ago
че вы все тут накарякали?
liveAk47 1 year ago
@liveAk47 а ты хочешь чтобы изначально англоязычный сайт был переполнен русским языком?
qblp 1 year ago
@qblp да
liveAk47 1 year ago
@liveAk47 тебе на rutube.. или хотя-бы на русские видео, а здесь тебе не рады.
qblp 1 year ago
@qblp рады будут ,если захочу
liveAk47 1 year ago
@liveAk47 это уж точно не от тебя зависит
qblp 1 year ago
@qblp Почему
liveAk47 1 year ago
@liveAk47 даже у знаменитых людей заслуживающих уважение есть много ненавистников а ты вообще всего лишь жалкая единица толпы как и все... с какой стати тебе должны быть рады здесь если ты ничего полезного не сделаешь а как и все родился, вырос, отдашь физический труд за деньги на которые сможешь существовать, будешь думать что крут, оставишь такое же бесполезное потомство и отправишься на тот свет... если тебе тут должны быть рады то и всем и каждому в этом мире...
qblp 1 year ago
the end was really cheesy...
piercen10 1 year ago
backlit glass blocks! classy!! lol
cs028 1 year ago
yeah thats why they make cars that crumple a little before stopping to make deceleration less painful.
redmastif01 1 year ago
@redmastif01 Exactly, although in engineering speak there's no such thing as deceleration, it's all acceleration.
G1NZOU 1 year ago
@G1NZOU exatcly: acceleration opposite the direction the object is traveling
redmastif01 1 year ago
lol zaje biste
KamilGratis 1 year ago
crash tests with real ppl???holy shit
GTAcrazyfan12 1 year ago
they could have taken out the "soft sell" part around 5:15 - i think the crashes gave a better point. WEAR YOUR F***IN BELT!!!!
whattheheck1000 1 year ago
Now your safe to have an enormus accident little child in the back of a pick up... since uve buckled up low and tight... :|
chrisbaker121924 1 year ago
The crash test at 4.00 in the mercedes 118 or 108?? is pretty intense!!! good strong car :P
chrisbaker121924 1 year ago
W 108, 1965-1972. I'd never crash a 1960s car :) Maybe a 2005+ car.
whattheheck1000 1 year ago
"safety features, like padded dashes" haha
corey4406 1 year ago
There was a Darwin Award to a guy a few years back. He was against putting on seatbelts, and died when flung out of the car in an accident.
I must say, those "tests" almost seemed worse than many crashes that actually happen.
AmayaYuukuno 1 year ago
OMFG !! ARE THEY IDIOTS??? jhahaahahahahahahahah 3:35
guilhermerrrr 1 year ago
The voice of the dummy in the passenger is Lorenzo Music. He was the voice of Garfield in the 1980's animated series :p
DukeFilmsInc 1 year ago
76gremlinguy, you are definitely a dummy. Your judgment cracks me up!
VideoJoeYo 2 years ago
1:04
Actually it was the carbon fiber body
zenith828 2 years ago
OMG pass me my blue pastel eyeliner and my Vuarnet sunglasses Buffy!!
CityandcountyofSF 2 years ago
Wow. Testing out those safety belts in Europe must have been quite the job.
BurberryShades 2 years ago
The Science technologie its great!!!!!!!
anassgame 2 years ago
try ramming you're head into the metal dashboards of the pre 1960's cars and you will wish you were ramming your head into the hard plastic of your 80's car!!!!!!!!!!!!
TurboRanger96 2 years ago 6
@TurboRanger96
1950s car - Metal - you're dead.
1980s car - Hard plastic - you're hurt.
2000s car - Air bags - you're okay.
whattheheck1000 1 year ago
@whattheheck1000 Makes me worried in my 1967 car.
G1NZOU 1 year ago
@G1NZOU Drive safely and you'll likely be fine.
whattheheck1000 1 year ago
@whattheheck1000 I will, scientists say you drive more carefully in a car you don't feel safe in anyway so it should keep me on my toes.
I think I'll upgrade the brakes to modern ones though, I wouldn't want to have them fail on me.
G1NZOU 1 year ago
hahaha is funny
az6700 2 years ago
I use a seatbelt if I'm in a car at all, even just sitting in the garage.
whattheheck1000 2 years ago
Lol at 4:06-4:08 How that guy didn't die from whiplash is beyond me...
Also liked the bit that cars have "modern safety features" like padded dashes WTF!? I had a 90' Park Avenue similar to the first car shown crashing and the dash was hard as hell
xXdigitalX 2 years ago
OMG i would have never tested safety belts xD
bixxius 2 years ago
i was born in 91...how come it seems like ive seen the talking dummies before
cool12291 2 years ago
yeah, they were def in something else...i was born in 88, but i def dont think im remember ads from when i was under a year old.
jmiller006 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I in 93 and I have seen these
pancakewafflebacon 2 years ago
So was I, I'm pretty sure they showed it to us in drivers ed.
Pavilion615 2 years ago
lol aahhhhhhh the 80's glad that 10 years is over
shattered79 2 years ago
decade of shame
panictactics 2 years ago
9 years. 1980 is not really an "80s" year.
whattheheck1000 2 years ago
yes it is
jakethegreatable 2 years ago
Not culturally. On the calendar it is, but the "80s" as is thought of by the mainstream was more of 1982-1992. 1980 was in the 80s technically, but it is often identified as having more "70s" trends.
whattheheck1000 2 years ago
how god damn stuåid can ypu be when yoou dont put on your belt, really.... I hear you ahve ltos of problems in america even nowadays with people dont buckling up.
Fucking idiots.
volvo145 2 years ago 4
I remember seeing this up until 1992 or so......those talking crash dummies use to weird me out though
sirmasterpimp 2 years ago 6
whos is that crashing at 1 minute?
ETBzocka 2 years ago
Some 1980s race car?
whattheheck1000 2 years ago
Actually a 1982 CART car with Dick Simon as driver. The crash was on August 29, 1982.
whattheheck1000 2 years ago
OMG...they showed us this in drivers ed...and i took that class 3 years ago!
laserturbo90 2 years ago 9
@laserturbo90 - the 80s live on! :)
Toni7859 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I like tosee that sweater wearing bitch test those belts.
How much dothey pay those fucking people
MUDLUVSME 2 years ago
LOL 3:19 The kid does the matrix over his dad! XD
ReventonF22 2 years ago 20
haha cool commercial. its funny as hell
brandonya1990 2 years ago 7
This has been flagged as spam show
What dick has been downspamming good comments? I'm giving +1 to every good comment.
whattheheck1000 2 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
govnari
Pajaribarac 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
shoulder belts suck....lap belts rock!
DamnStraightM35A2 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
fucking idiot
fliedlice88 2 years ago
then what's gonna hold your upper body down in a crash?
Artyfil 2 years ago 2
thin air LOL, but look at some of these 3pt seat belts, my dad has a '78 Camaro and it has 3pt. belts but the damn things don't have any tensioners so whats the point of the upper part of the belt?, that's what I was referring to.
DamnStraightM35A2 2 years ago 2
really? my '94 Jimmy doesn't seem to have tensioners (seatbelts don't lock when you yank on them), but when you slam on the brakes or get in an accident they lock up. Maybe your camaro did the same?
Artyfil 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
classifields
aligathor1979 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
hahahahahahaa look at the position at 3:27
pacothepimp1 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
omg .. those peoples necks, must have snapped...
C9H13NO3Adrenaline 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ha I remember watching this in driver's ed!
ianfigures 3 years ago
That´s my problem with reasoning for total individual freedom when it comes to things like public safety. "Public" is the hey word because we are never alone on the roads when we go for a ride. It´s an organized chaos.
ArgHamster 3 years ago 2
If two cars hit eachother at 100km/h the chances of leaving the wrecks with just bruises are low.
A small fairly modern car are often better than an old larger one but like you said in a bad accident that could be a theoretical question.
A practical question to your idea however is if you carpool with someone who´s not wearing a seatbelt or the other way around and you have an accident. Who´s responsible if one is thrown around the car and ends up injuring or killing the other passengers?
ArgHamster 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The chances of leaving the wreck at all are low...
JasloMilwaukee 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The driver is responsible as well as the unbelted occupant.
whattheheck1000 3 years ago
That´s an interesting point. The media rarely mentions if a person was useing the seatbelt. But in those cases where they do and also shows pictures and descriptions of the accident the crash happened at very high speeds and/or against other speeding cars, trucks or rocks that the chances of survival were very slim despite impactzones, air-bags and seatbelts.
ArgHamster 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i guess i'm a dummy, cause the seat belt laws are a big pile of BULL$#!+ and it violates my right to choose. i guess before long our flag will have a star, and sickle.
76gremlinguy 3 years ago
I would imagine it will be you splatterd all over the road after you went through the windscreen before the soviet flag is raised. Think of what your saying...!
baileys60 3 years ago 5
that may be true, but it just burns me to the core, that sooo much is wrong with our system that needs to be focused on, and they have to waste time and our money to pass stupid laws like this one, yet our taxes are keeping people like Charles Manson alive in jail, when they could have given that useless waste of a soul the electric chair back in the 60's. I can't understand what they get out of having that control over us, so really, I ask What next. Are they gonna take our classic cars away
76gremlinguy 3 years ago
ahhh I see the issue you are chipping away at. Frankly thats a matter for the courts to decide. Don't let it do your nut to much mate.
baileys60 3 years ago
I try not to let it get to me, but I tend to lean ttowards the small cars, and if the wreck is very sevier, then being confined in my car is just going to insure my death, with no chance at all being thrown from my car. Notice how you never hear the news say that people wearing their seatbelts that are killed in a wreck "The victim was wearing his/her seat belt"? No, they say "The driver/passenger was killed" BUT! DON'T wear a seat belt, the story will be followed by a lesson on seat belt safety
76gremlinguy 3 years ago
...and the courts are where the system is messed up. Do you think they really care about you, are the going to all funerals of victims killed that were wearing their seat belts?...I think it's just about revenue, and control
76gremlinguy 3 years ago
Seat belts work...you shoudn't need to choose. You make it sound like communism or socalism... which aren't totally bad systems. They work very well in some countrys. Charitys are distrubute wealth...
leeanator 3 years ago
True seatbelts work, but there has also been studies that seatbelts along w/airbags can be more dangerous than belts, or bags alone. I came up with that theory years before I saw it on the news. (wish I'd said something) The airbag is designed to catch you like a ball glove, so when the belt stop at it's limit, here comes a 200mph slap in the face. OUCH! (had it happen). but really, making laws to wear belts?, fingerprint for drivers license? What's next? Too much control to be called free
76gremlinguy 3 years ago
It´s common knowledge that airbags are to be used with belts. Hitting just an airbag will probably break your neck. It has to be fully inflated just to be used. Safety features are designed to function within speed limits. Drive into a rock at 150km/h and it´s just a question what kills you. You might get lucky and be thrown out and land in United Inflatable Castles backyard sale.
ArgHamster 3 years ago 2
Idividual freedom is an important thing. But with your reasoning you would also have to accept the fact that other private citizens, government and insurance should be able to use the same reasoning. If you were to be injured or handicaped in an accident (even one where you isn´t responsible) because you didn´t wear a belt. They could simply say "No fucking money for a wheelchair to him, it was his choice not to wear a belt."
ArgHamster 3 years ago
I can understand that there are many angles to look at this, but to make it LAW "You Have To Do This" to me is just wrong. I prefer to drive small cars myself, which in a really bad wreck the cance of survival is slim. Wearing a seatbelt in this event would just insure my death. The really sad thing about it all, is that the news wouldn't say a damn thing that the person killed was wearing his seatbelt. Just "The driver was killed", but you'd damn sure hear it if not wearing one.
76gremlinguy 3 years ago
LMAO, its ironic that GM called seatbelts a waste of money when they first came out.
CNiallDeMencha 3 years ago
that was ford.
starionorscott 3 years ago
gilipollas callate la boquita anda
Aturuxo32 3 years ago
Yeah!!!Funny oldie! ...we are dummies, we don't wear safety belts, Larry, you really know how to build a guy, Hit it!!hehehe
aramendi 3 years ago 4
lol, I like the intro
Tidersexual 3 years ago
Ha, haaaa...uncle Joey is the host of this segment, ha, haaa...Look at that good old Mercedes, how well it does on the crash.
sanchorb 3 years ago
We'll all be laughing at you when you get into a head-on and go flying through the windscreen.
volvomantom 3 years ago 4
That's funny that they used a Ford Futura as the intro to a GM movie
fordcontour 3 years ago
omg! they showed me this in Drivers ed!!
TjallingProductions 3 years ago
Great video . I always use my seatbelt even if it`s just very short journey . I was saved by it once.
fontheking3 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Stupid video. I only use seatbelt if I have to go far. No point in it otherwise.
tannalv 3 years ago
when you have to go only a couple of miles from your place... what happens if a drunk guy comes across you, fast, and hits you? you think you'll be fine "because you didn't have to go far"?
In my job, I see accidents every day, and most are not in places where people drive fast, like highways. They happen mostly in the cities where you come across people who "don't have to go far"
mcfly0570 3 years ago 3
I only use my seatbelt if I'm in a vehicle at all, no matter if it's a 582 inch or 582 mile trip.
whattheheck1000 2 years ago
iam working with the met police and ive seen a lots of horrible accidents with no restraind driver.
becky334 3 years ago
Nice plasma TV at 5.20 :D cool
andronickvll 3 years ago
LOL, the BMW in the tree !
lepivert 3 years ago
nice music in the last!
krille470t 3 years ago
can they crash test a m1a2 army tank with reinforced armor? or will that just rip right past the wall
commanderofwar 3 years ago 2
they tested on people :D
balivyta 3 years ago
One of the dummies sounds like Homer Simpson. Maybe he got fed up with doing a voice-over for a dummy and got a job doing a voice over for, a dummy.
kingspunkbubble 3 years ago 4
Comment removed
GMminivans9968 3 years ago
Comment removed
GMminivans9968 3 years ago
Comment removed
GMminivans9968 3 years ago
Comment removed
GMminivans9968 3 years ago
Comment removed
GMminivans9968 3 years ago
Comment removed
GMminivans9968 3 years ago 2
Sent what?
GMminivans9968 3 years ago
Okay, sure.
GMminivans9968 3 years ago
Give me the directions!
GMminivans9968 3 years ago
Comment removed
GMminivans9968 3 years ago
Comment removed
GMminivans9968 3 years ago
Comment removed
GMminivans9968 3 years ago
4:05 omfg that was hard!
slovakmath 3 years ago
Comment removed
GMminivans9968 3 years ago
The start of the video says General Motors on it.
DrRodMunch 3 years ago
It's a GM propoganda film, dumbass.
Still, check out the car at 4:00 :)
streetvan1 3 years ago
Comment removed
GMminivans9968 3 years ago
What's proof of what now?
streetvan1 3 years ago
Comment removed
GMminivans9968 3 years ago
HUH? How?
streetvan1 3 years ago
Comment removed
GMminivans9968 3 years ago
Riiiiight. Ok, nevermind. I'm sure that GM would show their product in an honest light, no matter what, because that's what large corporations do. Honesty is number one, self promotion is waaay down the list. Yu huh.
streetvan1 3 years ago
Comment removed
GMminivans9968 3 years ago
Well, your wrong :P
D4ndi 3 years ago
Comment removed
GMminivans9968 3 years ago
isnt that one dummy bill murrary or the voice of garfield?
jamesfrancis5 3 years ago
lol, garfield's voice
NortierNR 3 years ago
luv 80's yayaya
zxcvbad 3 years ago
good video
flatground900 3 years ago
Nice sweater! lol
rayban5016 3 years ago
was the car a car?
Was the car damaged?
smartestinUSA 3 years ago
no,the car was in first class condition after the srash.
Tom741 3 years ago
wtf's a srash?
whattheheck1000 3 years ago
i mastaked it for crash,
no,the car was in first class condition after the crash
Tom741 3 years ago
no it was wrecked. Can you not see that
smartestinUSA 3 years ago
miss the 80's :(
odelgado78 3 years ago
4:06 - Think the guy knew what he was in for?
Mercedes scientist: Du must ein auto at 120 km in oder auto krashen.
Driver : uh, I don't think this is what I signed up for...
Mercedes scientist: DU MUST CONTINUE MIT DIE EXPERIMENT!!!!
pigjamelectric 3 years ago 3
lol he nearly stuck the nut in the steering wheel. ha ha love your interpretation
SXI1972 3 years ago
2:36 - P4WN3D! I lovw how they fly back after they hit the dash.
knobcheese69 3 years ago
lolololol
nofgood 3 years ago
4:03 NO! Don't crash that classy car!... damn.
oh well back to the film.
jonnda 3 years ago 2
lol,.. real live crach dummys,.. love the 80s :)
nofgood 4 years ago 3
Yeah and one of them sounds like Garfield. ^_^
jonnda 3 years ago
it is the voice of garfield.
the guys name is lorenzo music weird name tho
SXI1972 3 years ago
I noticed that too!
88Buick225 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I know somebody that was in a crash and they said if he was wearing a seatbelt, he would have gotten killed. I have to wear a seatbelt because I slide everywhere whenever I make a turn because I have the leather seats. I would have gotten cloth seats to help prevent that sliding but, they are not heated.
Kreepiting67 4 years ago
in most accidents if you dont wear the belt you fly out from the car and die for sure...i have read about several accidents where ppl died because they didnt wear the belt.
mrsngamegbu 3 years ago
First, learn proper English! Second, Toyota is not number one alone, they have the same number as GM. Third, some of the cars you named are not available in the US. Toyota, Honda, and Nissan have some of the most popular sedans; however when it comes to SUVs, and Trucks, American brand still has the edge. Finally, Toyota, Honda and Nissan are made in the states. It's noteworthy to mention that many of the "Japanese" cars are built in cooperation with General Motors (Suzuki, Subaru, and Toyota)
jackjohns01 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I do remember two things we built that were absolutely amazing. Then we put them in an airplane and dropped them on your shitty country.
Treycq 4 years ago
there are actualy 3 crashes
the first 2 crashes and you internal organs moving to fast is the 3 crash
pj8guy 4 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Yup wear seatbelts and you will never ever die. It's funny, "saved lives" eventually die. Are they really saved? If in a crash you survive that particular incident.
ebuhman29 4 years ago
The best saftey feature is stay alert and don't hist stuff.
ebuhman29 4 years ago 4
hmm maby if they had AIR BAGS!!!
coolboy454 4 years ago
just watch 3:18
the back guy is like "sup" to the other guy upside down
pj8guy 4 years ago
how much did they get payed
poopoomum 4 years ago
hey man this is great
djrionblack 4 years ago
I expected him to say "Hi, I'm Troy McClure..." at the start!
Great stuff.
ludocrat 4 years ago 3
Yea....when you get sick do not use any drug just keep the faith....well I'm so sorry of you.
wydaniu 4 years ago
lol
sgtcht92 4 years ago
The guy who did the voice for that one Crash Test Dummy also did the voice for Garfield and Peter Venkman on The Ghostbusters cartoon show.
deadredeyes 4 years ago
WOW! NO SEATBELTS
1987ian 4 years ago
the talking and singing dummies were disturbing...
1972volkswagen 4 years ago
rofl :D is there a movie about psycho killer crash test dummies? it might be scary shit
followtheraver 4 years ago
Why does the one crash test dummy sound like Garfield?
fokofpolisiekar07 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
THAT GUY IS A FAG!!!
sk8stevenbrock1 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Unfair liberal crash safety, fuel economy laws and unions have resulted in increased costs which have made American cars uncompetitive, unaffordable, unprofitable and undesireable. Lets go back to free economics and let the market decide who should win. Voluntary corporate changes are always more manageable and fair than government mandated changes. Vote NO to loss. Vote YES to jobs.
LatteLiberal 4 years ago
you're joking... right?
tastyorange 4 years ago
yep, and then when the ppl closest to you die in unsafe cars, who will you whine to then?
Picquet 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
When people close to my have died in unsafe cars I didn't blame it on somebody else. I didn't blame it on automakers. I didn't blame it on politics. I took personal responsibility and assumed it was GOD who decided to take them. When you have faith in the Lord you don't need seatbelts.
LatteLiberal 4 years ago
But God gives you a brain to think and wear seatbelts. That was the dumbest shit I've heard in a long time.
MizzPrincezz 4 years ago 2
for a "latte liberal" you sound just like ron paul
maddog24637 4 years ago
He sounds like a 4-year-old AND Ron Paul!
whattheheck1000 4 years ago
Wow, that Oldsmobile 98 and Pontiac Grand AM did pretty well in the crashes. I guess that's because cars today hit offset barriers (only about 40% of the car's frontal portion is impacted) and its a much tougher test than hitting a wall with the full front of the car.
landongendur 4 years ago
keiwata262
older cars had a rubber seal holding the windowscreen in
new cars windscreens are bonded in
DEEJAYBELL1976 4 years ago