this man faith is only in lies and deception, justifying an illegal war in a tribunal willing to sacrafice those young men who did not need sacraficeing at the same time rallying for another war with Iran, with more lies and deception. 666
@TheMarkOfTheBeast1 interesting choice of words dude, I see ya got the male genitalia on your mind with ALL your GAY komments huh pussy! Just nod your head yes like the puppy U are, good boy, here's a biscuit! *pats head*
I hear from kind and good jews that some groups of USA jews are the most asholes in the world because they kill over 18 soliders that came home from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan every day and they play that its suicide. They kill them because jews have stealed gold from under the world trade center and this jews have done the 911 attack on Pentagon and on WTC the 11 of sep 2001. And they have stealed Saddams gold to. And they kill the soliders because they think a non jew is nothing worth.
What Tony Blair is clearly saying is that God told him to go to war in Iraq (he has admitted this in a far clearer fashion in an interview with Michael Parkinson). If I was in the British Cabinet at that time and he had said that to me, I would have said, "Prime Minister, these men in white coats are not going to hurt you. They are here to help you." What a spineless load of imbeciles those Government ministers must have been for going along with that luny half wit (except Robin Cook of course.)
Some of the comments here are absolutely ridiculous. He's one of the most reasoned men of faith I've ever heard speak. I'm an atheist with a passionate distaste for religion, but to say that Tony Blair is akin to George Bush when it comes to religion is absolutely laughable.
And again, more people that are disgraceful enough to speak about Iraq without knowing the first thing about it.
@ubernaffa THANK YOU! I am a fellow atheist that shares you passionate distaste for religion. I agree that Tony Blair seems far more reasonable about faith than most. Too many people speak about people or situations, most notably Iraq, with a laughable amount of knowledge about that subject, but act as if they know everything.
Two words describe Tony Blair: war criminal. He can go on about God all he likes, but God will see Tony like we see him: a lying, devious crook who fools the gullible - and himself - with phony emotionalism and pious preaching. One day this man will answer for what he has done to Britain and Iraq
I can't believe he has gotten away with it too. I really can't understand why the media and politicians still consult this lying, deluded has-been. Blair is one of those people who can get away with anything. If he were an African, Asian or someone from a poor East European country he would have been tried for war crimes by UN. But, as he is British poodle to the Americans, he just walks away with his grin and loads of cash. It is no wonder our society is in decline
Anyone in a such a position of power such as Prime Minister who believes that religious faith (ie belief in an unprovable supernatural being) is a solid foundation for making decisions should be removed from that position immediately on grounds of mental instability.
Religion is the biggest obstacle to world peace. Communism is second. Blair is the ultimate religious hypocrite, he thinks he's above others due to it, when in fact he's far less righteous. Thou shalt not lie, dick head.
Yet another example of a moronic, childish, simplistic, you tube comment. Not interested in a debate, not interested in the arguments for both sides, but seeing the world in purely simple terms.
Incase you didn't notice, this is a comments section to give your opinions. That was mine. I love a debate as much as the next person, but I shall give bLIAR the same amount of recognition and respect that he gave the British people (and indeed the world) when he ignored the huge public opposition and marched headfirst into an illegal war.
Parliament voted to support the war, and it had cross-party support (including the Tories).
Blair, like everyone at the time, believed Iraq had WMD. His intelligence confirmed this. He was terrified that these would end up in the hands of Al Queda and be used against us in 5, 10 years time. So he took a decision to protect us. He hardly benefitted from it personally - his reputation was greatly damaged.
Leaders can't give in to public opposition - we need conviction politicans
@THthefirst BLAIR has bennifitted personely to the tune of around £20 million since he did a runer 2 years ago inclueding a check for over one million pounds after helping an south correan oil company secure an oil contract .his estimated earnings will be 100 million over the next 10 years.his intellgence confirmed nothing at the time but blair was hell bent on impressing bush.he talks about religus conviction then after he did a runer converted the cathlic faith.
You make it sound like he waged the war single-handedly - this is nonsense. As I said, he had cross-party support and the support of other nations around the world (Italy, Spain, Australia, Holland, Sweden, US etc).
Sometimes leaders have to take hard decisions, even if these make them unpopular. You can disagree with his judgment. That doesn't make him a liar and an evil man, though, does it? It makes him someone that took a view you disagree with.
if he had joined the catholic church when in power, he wouldnt have lasted 2 minutes. and quite rightly so, that ancient barbaric religion should fade away
I Read somewhere that this Bastard bought his son an apartment worth over a million pounds. Selfish Nest Feathering slimey shitbag. His witch of a wife was on newsnight once trying to justify why she bought her other son TWO FLATS.
She is a Greedy , self serving Hag faced Trollop who is also a patronising , condescending, shitbag frogeyed liar aswell.
This man is beguiled by power and money , a complete Charlatan.....that's why he's a fully paid-up member of the Zionist cause and finds time in his ' busy ' schedule of one week per month in Jerusalem to accept money from his 'masters'. Example : 2 days after Israel IDF slaughtered 1300 arabs in Gaza he was in Tel Aviv accepting an award and a prize of $1 MILLION. At least Cherie was pleased !! I wonder if SHE spared a thought for the dead women and children whilst counting the money ?
I'm not sure I agree.. He has stated several times that religion doesn't have a big influence on his political beliefs, at least compared to G.W. Bush.
He's just another puppet frontman, he handed over the control of interest rates to the bank of england (rothschild) and lead his nation in a war.
and now he is rewarded by getting advisory positions at JPMorgan Chase and swiss banks. Seriously its so obvious...
And to think in his past he opposed the bank of england. I think somewhere in his career he got the offer to enforce their agenda and be payed generously or be killed/blackmailed/framed.
he is a high ranking member in the order of the knights of malta,hes not just a puppet,hes a major player,not as big as the bankers,council of 13 or jesuits or rosicrucians but non the less a major player,time will prove that.
This SATANIST piece of shit wanna be witch asshole who has tried to push us all into tyranny should be struck by lightening talking about his faith,,,please Tony shut the fuck up we all know you and your wife are luciferian slime
You think you have to mix religion and politics together to be a complete disaster? I'm sure he rationalised his decision to go to war with the help of his naive religious beliefs.
your right, one does not have to mix religion and politics together to create disaster, unfortunately the UK did not have a choice but to assist the USA in their "coalition of the willing" due to a pact that has been in force since world war 1. I dont believe Blair had religious motivations to join the war in Iraq, the poor sod did not have a choice in the matter.
I believe his motivations came from his ego and his personal finances. He did have a choice - as much of a choice as France and Germany - but he didn't want to disconnect himself personally from the US. He knew that if he engendered goodwill there, he could milk that cow for all it's worth in public appearances and have a chance at being remembered as a great statesman. He isn't and he won't be.
well that may be a moot point but there was overwhelming disapproval of the war from the start so he could not have done it for his personal ego or to leave a lasting legacy.
He will be remembered for a few things such as brokering the northen ireland/ireland peace deal, passing of the human rights act, not to mention his admirable debate skills used in the house of commons.
Globalisation is shit wanker, , you fucking dirty lying pig get back to George Bush'es scullery or his bedroom you little French Maid Blair, and no your "Sugar Daddy " George Bush can't make you total European President you fucking money grabbing warmongering dog
Win a war ? What the hell does that mean ? In my opinion only, no one wins a war ! For someone of Blair`s intellect, it is a remarkably childish notion that a war can be won !
He did omit that religion informed him on how to start a war, i guess that takes us back to bush rumsfeld etc a but Tony Blair is a well known socio path here in england along with peter mandelson, power mad if you ask me.
anyone with a religious belief should certainly be restricted from positions of high political power. also, i do find it curious how tony blair, who is clearly an intelligent man, can truly believe in a God. i very much doubt he does believe in God in the conventional sense. one thing is for sure, his belief in the importance of religion for the continued moral guidance and control of the masses
willybarton, i agree with you on the comment that he may not actually believe in God in the conventional sense. However, from your comments I assume that you do not believe. My question to you is, does it take more belief to believe in a divine being who created the universe, or more faith that just a occurence of events that had perfect timing from which everything came from. If you have ever worked on your car, what do you think the chance is it all come together? Can a car reassemble itself.
hello. yes you assume right, i am not a theist, and it confuses me why so many people are. The notion of everything 'coming together' like a car as you put it, isnt really a relevant question to me, i dont believe anything came together for us, we are just a by-product of a long chain of events. That we have been created in the image of our creator is absurd to me- more so with each day and each advance in the sciences Is merely having a faith enough for you? would you not like more answers?
The events did not have perfect timing. Our solar system formed from an exploding star and thus the allocation of particles that make up our planet was completely random. The Earth is 4 billion years old and the human race is only 22000 years old. The evolution process was also random. Thus, our creation by no means was planned or controlled, unlike the development of a car. If God cannot intervene in events in the universe and no proof of one exists, why is he/she/it relevant?
just another sickening speach from blairs mouth,this time he uses his faith to justify killing over 200,000 iracis including women and children,i hope your fucking god is proud of you blair.
Tony Blair plays a major part in perpetrating an immoral and ILLEGAL war that kills tens of thousands of innocent civilians, and he has the cheek to lecture the world on religion?
Every time I hear him speak I throw up a little bit in my mouth.
He is without a doubt amongst the lowest form of life on this planet and he broke a new low for the British government whom I'd always respected in the past.
No, he/she doesn't. The rash claim that has been made is supported by one paragraph of poorly developed prose. To substantiate this claim requires an awareness of many factors. There is a dearth of anything intelligent in that remark, and it is this reactionary rubbish, which dissuades deep discussion - it's largely the province of immaturity.
I seek no fight, but I seek substance.
It's quite embarrassing that you would be swayed by the junk he/she wrote.
What it's quite embarrassing is the fact that you're supporting a war criminal. Therefore if you seek substance then go to Abu Graib or Basora and ask natives about Blair's brilliant vocabulary and nice bombs.
I'm not swayed by the junk anybody wrote, I'm swayed by the fact you seem to support the horrible politican which brought the world to an unnecesary war supported by two retarded neocons Bush and Aznar.
And now you can go and drink your tea in buckingham palace.
So, cheddyrod, are these people "dumb" for beliving in God or not? Yes or No? Newton, Pasteur, Einstein, Michaelangelo, Copernicus, Bacon, Kepler , Galileo, Descartes, Boyle, Faraday, Mendel and many others. Yes or No?
"cheddyrod" said "bright people cannot have religious faith", he therefore thinks he is more intelligent than Newton, Pasteur, Einstein, Michaelangelo, Copernicus, Bacon, Kepler , Galileo, Descartes, Boyle, Faraday, Mendel and countless others. How about that eh?
That is what is said at the precipice of WW II. He had to say that because of political reasons. Now answer the question. Why did Einstein say religion was childish and primitive?
cheddyrod, are these people "dumb" for beliving in God or not? Yes or No? Newton, Pasteur, Einstein, Michaelangelo, Copernicus, Bacon, Kepler , Galileo, Descartes, Boyle, Faraday, Mendel and many others. Yes or No?
1. I do know about Einstein's views on religion and how they affected his scientific work and it is his scientific work that I am mainly interested in. The others that you mentioned I have no interest in investigating whether they were or were not religious and which religion if any they followed.
2. Now getting back to Einstein, why did he say that religion was childish and primitive? When you answer that question you can also answer this question. What troubled Einstein about his Quantum Theory and did his Quantum Theory affect his views on religions? If you read the works of the three philosophers that I previously had mentioned you wouldnt ask such inane questions.
I'm sorry, this isnt just about one Scientist, no matter how much you wish to skew this debate. Einstein wasn't, unlike you, an athiest. It was you who said anyone who believe in God is dim; are you prepared to withdraw that statement or not?
You are the one who brought scientists into this argument. I didn't mention God. You did. You do not understand the difference between belief, true belief and knowledge and until you know the difference you will continue to write garbage and SKEW this argument all over hell's half acre. I never said Einstein was an atheist. There is little point in continuing this argument until you become educated. Find out something about Einstein and not just his interview in Time.
You did say bright people cannot have religious beliefs, or are you now denying that? I have quite easily demonstrated that many, many bright people, many of them among the most prominment scientists in history also were religious men. According to your reasoning they are "dim." That's what you said, and now you can't defend it becuase you know you are wrong.
That is a contradiction. Blair believes but beliefs are not knowledge. Blair believed that Iraq had WMDs but the knowledge was that there was none. Blair believes there is a Christian God and the knowledge is that there isn't a Christian God. Bright people cannot have religious faith because it is a ridiculous concept and an oxymoron.
Absolute arrogant rubbish. "Bright people cannot have religious faith", would you include Newton, Einstien, Michaelangelo,... Furhtermore, for a "bright" person, you don't seem to know the difference between knowledge and faith.
Look up Platos and Socrates arguments for and against the ideas that true belief (true faith) is knowledge. Also read Edmund Gettiers arguments that true faith is not knowledge. All of this should have been covered in your introductory philosophy class. If and when you understand these arguments your silly idea that true faith is knowledge will become clear. These arguments should be clear to anyone who has reasonable intellectual capacity.
No, you don't seem to be able to grasp the simple understanding, that faith and knowledge are different concepts. Once again the Dawkins disciplies setting up a straw man; no one is saying faith is knowledge apart from you. And please answer my earlier point; you say "bright people cannot have religious faith" where does this leave Newton, Einstein and many many others?
You obviously have never studied philosophy. Do some research into the conflict that Einstein's religious faith and the knowledge he gained caused him in his later years. When Einstein was young he was trained to believe in religion and when he got older that training caused him a great deal of conflict. All animals can be trained and that has nothing to do with intelligence. When you understand my previous post you will understand. There is a relationship between beliefs and knowledge .
If you read Edmund Gettiers, Plato and Socrates you will understand the relationship between faith and knowledge. When you have finished reading these get back to me.
Much has been written about Einsteins views on religion. Some Einstein wrote and some have been falsely attributed to him. In Einsteins latter years he did state religious beliefs are childish and primitive. Is that news to you? If you had read Edmund Gettiers, Plato and Socrates like I asked you too you might become a little less dim. Until you learn the basics of philosophy you will never hope to become bright.
Eistein believed in God, and that's a fact as did numerous other geniuses, and that is also a fact. Which means you are wrong in your statement. So are we to assume that unless we agree with you we are "dim"? Get over yourself please.
You are a liar. When you distort the truth and use lies there is no point in continuing the argument. I gave no personal abuse. You lied and that makes you a liar.
I'm sorry to have to contradict you once more, but Einstein wasn't an athiest, look up the interview he gave to Time magazine. And what do you have to say about Newton, Pasteur, Copernicus, Marconi, Kant, Hume....all believied in God, they also on your dim list? You're a biggot.
Globalization will never be a true reality because every country has its own culture and its traditions but I think that a meltingpot in a country is absoulutely necessery but I just don't want to see mc donalds or sushis bars remplacing french restaurant in my country ! our food is quite better than buggers isn't it ? LOL
Most people are never smart. No matter what country it would be. People are not equal thus intellectual elite is always a minority. College degree means nothing nowadays.
If religion leaders are good enough they teach that religion is not about killing each other. Anyway nevermind, I'm an atheist from a country where it's regarded as sth really negative (catholic Poland) so I don't care about religion till it doesn't harm me.
"Your founders said they're not going 2 repeat European mistakes & want to live in peace in their own continent, didn't they?"
That was isolationist speaking in the 18th century . Today the 'Global Village' makes that impossible . "When the rights of one man are threatened the rights of all men are in peril" . Pretty simple concept to understand that people avoid like the plauge because they have no answer to the problem that the only price that freedom will accept is blood . Live w/it .
'Global village' is just an ideological bullshit. I don't want USA go to Poland no matter what would happen there. And as far as I am concerned politicians always go to war with some of their interest they do not declare a war just because someone seems dangerous to their country. And non-inteventionism is not the same as isolationism. It's good that USA entered WW2 and helped UK but I don't like seeing american troops in Somalia/etc.
"It's so offensive the way ppl of "faith" claim monopoly on spiritualism & morality"
Wait untill the cry's of terror come to your town after a bomb explodes , you'll be "offended" even more when you see the after effects of zealots with a apocalyptic vision of the future , were hero's are in martyrdom.
What I mean is that most people are stupid and they need religion. Religion is a stabilizer and keeps society in order. Religion was founded by politicians - in ancient times religion leaders were rulers and vice versa. Anyone that is intelligent enough don't believe it - but also know that it is good for common people. When there's no faith people start to seek security from government, thus socialistic ideas seem for them to be good, etc.
I don't think world needs less religion - though I'm an atheist - it is good when normal people has some stable moral values to follow. They just have a better leaders that will explain to them that their religion is not about violence.
And if there's no religion people start believing in anything like Big Brother or UFOs, only a few are intelligent enough to find values for themselves like Nietzsche once said.
What the terrotists have to do with Iraq? The war on terror was the oen in Afghanistan after 9/11 - Iraq was just a kid's play fo Bush.
I wonder why Bush wants to restore democracy only in Iraq don't care about Belaraus for example - because it was one of the main issue, wasn't it? 'Promoting democracy in the world' - what a crap.
"I wonder y Bush wants 2 restore democracy only in Iraq ... Promoting democracy in the world - what a crap"
The war in Iraq was about getting rid of a man who tried 2 kill GHWB & destabilise the Gulf region by attacking Iran & Kuwait, gasing the Kurds .
That wasn't so bad but when he got close 2 Saudi Arabia thru Kuwait , IMO it was time 2 act . Hussien was a man of big ambitions & evil : See the video 'The Fires of Kuwait' were he ruined the ecology 4 yrs 2 come .
OK, but you will agree that America wasn't founded to be interested in the world affairs? Your founders said they're not going to repeat European mistakes and want to live in peace in theie own continent, didn't they?
And I don't oppose this war a priori - I am only concerned about this bullshit that media trying to tell us. And 'restoring democracy'was one of the most common lie I heard on TV.
It's so offensive the way people of "faith" claim monopoly on spiritualism and morality, as if secular works of art and a science based morality (like saving women and children from AIDS by distributing condoms in Africa) doesn't even exist.
America does not need people haters and political bigots like you. America is a place of diversity and individuality that welcomes all kinds of differing people and their differing ideas - including Conservatives and Republicans. Take your stereotyped hatred against millions & millions of Americans and leave this nation now you stupendous OAF
Intelligent people are not necessarily good, even if they enounce how religious they are.
Imho - Blair is a very talented politician, sth rather quite rare nowadays, but he is not a guy I'd like have as a friend - I don't like cynic people. Cynic in a recent understanding, of course, because the ancient meaning was far more noble.
I do not think he belives in this faith ****.....religion is the best remedy for an ignorant wo cant comprehend the fact that our world is milions of years old and life has existed lllllllllllllooooooooooooooooooong b4 jesus phenomen....
Britain in fact has two governments, one a parliamentary charade for the edification of the credulous, the other the real monarchial government of the Queen and her Privy Council.
500 people under the Queen run the British Empire, including the mou;d of its old Colonial Office, which was never abandoned. It is the Overseas Development Office now. The Crown Agents who ran the colonies still function. They operate whole countries around the world. The mercenary forces in Africa are British.
So that's what Bambi Blair is up to these days? Pontificating, preening & lying to a US audience.
No change there then.
How depressing to witness this arch hypocrite & liar still spouting his Neo Labour right wing garbage. Globalisation is not bringing anyone together...it is driving the World apart with its exploitation & profiteering. Look how old this fey little lickspittle looks in his girl's pink tie. "God told me to"...yes, blame God for hundreds of thousands of corpses you weak coward.
Sure, it may sound wonderful at first, but it is only severl years through progess when one sees the real chaos globalisation creates. It only benefits the ultra rich and coporations.
Tony lost her spirit in Catholicism, he need to repent and understnd Who is Jesus really and baptize into the water to be saved...my suggestion Tony, go to a Penticostal Church where you can be born again
How the Left has descended. Instead of rational premises and conclusions, they parrot words like "evil, bad, greed and hate" like a 1st grade argument. Leftist cant grasp that their freedom to criticize the government is forbidden in societies they praise. Once the Berlin Wall came tumbling down, you'd think they'd concede the disaster Marxism was and note that capitalism flourishes. But Communist rhetoric still flows and makes a new movement in global warming, environmentalist nonsense.
IS there a website for the most hypocritical people of all time? I can think of someone who should be no. 1 ;)
nowthatsinteresting1 9 months ago
this man faith is only in lies and deception, justifying an illegal war in a tribunal willing to sacrafice those young men who did not need sacraficeing at the same time rallying for another war with Iran, with more lies and deception. 666
kocktoe 10 months ago
Kangaroo court for war criminal Tony Blair !
nedeljko18 10 months ago
Hang this man for war crimes!
TheMarkOfTheBeast1 1 year ago
@TheMarkOfTheBeast1 interesting choice of words dude, I see ya got the male genitalia on your mind with ALL your GAY komments huh pussy! Just nod your head yes like the puppy U are, good boy, here's a biscuit! *pats head*
genxxxersize 1 year ago
I hear from kind and good jews that some groups of USA jews are the most asholes in the world because they kill over 18 soliders that came home from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan every day and they play that its suicide. They kill them because jews have stealed gold from under the world trade center and this jews have done the 911 attack on Pentagon and on WTC the 11 of sep 2001. And they have stealed Saddams gold to. And they kill the soliders because they think a non jew is nothing worth.
honnnesty 1 year ago
What Tony Blair is clearly saying is that God told him to go to war in Iraq (he has admitted this in a far clearer fashion in an interview with Michael Parkinson). If I was in the British Cabinet at that time and he had said that to me, I would have said, "Prime Minister, these men in white coats are not going to hurt you. They are here to help you." What a spineless load of imbeciles those Government ministers must have been for going along with that luny half wit (except Robin Cook of course.)
njorl99 1 year ago
@njorl99 Dear friend,"God told him" is a just his rationalization for the "voices" that he perhaps experienced,he should see the doctor.
nedeljko18 10 months ago
PM for 10 years, and it shows on his face. But he will no doubt be fine. He has friends in low places.
valarmanwe 1 year ago
Tony,im shitting on your face!!!
dicktp 1 year ago
Tony Blair's "value system". LOL.
Self-serving, lying, slime-bag lawyer.
perspexscreen 1 year ago
Some of the comments here are absolutely ridiculous. He's one of the most reasoned men of faith I've ever heard speak. I'm an atheist with a passionate distaste for religion, but to say that Tony Blair is akin to George Bush when it comes to religion is absolutely laughable.
And again, more people that are disgraceful enough to speak about Iraq without knowing the first thing about it.
ubernaffa 1 year ago
@ubernaffa THANK YOU! I am a fellow atheist that shares you passionate distaste for religion. I agree that Tony Blair seems far more reasonable about faith than most. Too many people speak about people or situations, most notably Iraq, with a laughable amount of knowledge about that subject, but act as if they know everything.
dye0610 1 year ago
Two words describe Tony Blair: war criminal. He can go on about God all he likes, but God will see Tony like we see him: a lying, devious crook who fools the gullible - and himself - with phony emotionalism and pious preaching. One day this man will answer for what he has done to Britain and Iraq
DavyTom71 1 year ago 2
@DavyTom71 spot on mate, I can't beleive he has got away with invading Iraq based on lies about WMD's, that should be classed as a war crime.
Wardogz1z 1 year ago
Comment removed
DavyTom71 1 year ago
@Wardogz1z
@Wardogz1z
I can't believe he has gotten away with it too. I really can't understand why the media and politicians still consult this lying, deluded has-been. Blair is one of those people who can get away with anything. If he were an African, Asian or someone from a poor East European country he would have been tried for war crimes by UN. But, as he is British poodle to the Americans, he just walks away with his grin and loads of cash. It is no wonder our society is in decline
DavyTom71 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@DavyTom71 spot on mate, I can't believe he has got away with invading Iraq based on lies about WMD's, that should be classed as a war crime.
Wardogz1z 1 year ago
Worst PM ever. Complete knobjockey. Full of BS and ego trips. Why do so many Yanks love this ponce?
JMR83 1 year ago
Why every British politician is wearing pink ties?
mullaahmed 1 year ago
Anyone in a such a position of power such as Prime Minister who believes that religious faith (ie belief in an unprovable supernatural being) is a solid foundation for making decisions should be removed from that position immediately on grounds of mental instability.
jolly246 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
CUNT CUNT CUNT CUNT
tommydoing50 1 year ago
you can see when blair lies he mounth opens, he and brown has fucked this country
tommydoing50 1 year ago
Religion is the biggest obstacle to world peace. Communism is second. Blair is the ultimate religious hypocrite, he thinks he's above others due to it, when in fact he's far less righteous. Thou shalt not lie, dick head.
kkwillsaveus 1 year ago
WHATEVER COMES FROM HIS MOUTH IS SHIT, SHIT, SHIT.
KillTheBlairs 1 year ago
hes not the prettiest guy is he? bad teeth uni brow no hair cut cheap suit big forehead receding hairline......idk
sirblingsalot 1 year ago
Blair a great Prime Minister..
7777777759 1 year ago
why are politicians attacked so much more than businessmen are? I mean businessmen are naive, pseudo-intellectuals.
shackle5 1 year ago
Bring back Tony Blair!!!! Now!!!
NumberDne 1 year ago
Blair is a hypocritical, lying, butt-sucking, war-mongering fool.
tristessa56079 1 year ago
Yet another example of a moronic, childish, simplistic, you tube comment. Not interested in a debate, not interested in the arguments for both sides, but seeing the world in purely simple terms.
THthefirst 1 year ago
@THthefirst
Incase you didn't notice, this is a comments section to give your opinions. That was mine. I love a debate as much as the next person, but I shall give bLIAR the same amount of recognition and respect that he gave the British people (and indeed the world) when he ignored the huge public opposition and marched headfirst into an illegal war.
tristessa56079 1 year ago
Parliament voted to support the war, and it had cross-party support (including the Tories).
Blair, like everyone at the time, believed Iraq had WMD. His intelligence confirmed this. He was terrified that these would end up in the hands of Al Queda and be used against us in 5, 10 years time. So he took a decision to protect us. He hardly benefitted from it personally - his reputation was greatly damaged.
Leaders can't give in to public opposition - we need conviction politicans
THthefirst 1 year ago
@THthefirst BLAIR has bennifitted personely to the tune of around £20 million since he did a runer 2 years ago inclueding a check for over one million pounds after helping an south correan oil company secure an oil contract .his estimated earnings will be 100 million over the next 10 years.his intellgence confirmed nothing at the time but blair was hell bent on impressing bush.he talks about religus conviction then after he did a runer converted the cathlic faith.
thedavewalkershow 1 year ago
You make it sound like he waged the war single-handedly - this is nonsense. As I said, he had cross-party support and the support of other nations around the world (Italy, Spain, Australia, Holland, Sweden, US etc).
Sometimes leaders have to take hard decisions, even if these make them unpopular. You can disagree with his judgment. That doesn't make him a liar and an evil man, though, does it? It makes him someone that took a view you disagree with.
THthefirst 1 year ago
@THthefirst
all the parties who join the gung ho party are not in power anymore ,that's start idiot!
johnfowler100 1 year ago
@tristessa56079
You said: "when he ignored the huge public opposition and marched headfirst into an illegal war."
"The hardest thing about politics is doing what you know to be the right thing even though it may not be the popular thing."
-The great Tony Blair from this video.
DoNotBeHighandMighty 1 year ago
if he had joined the catholic church when in power, he wouldnt have lasted 2 minutes. and quite rightly so, that ancient barbaric religion should fade away
kaypaxian1 1 year ago
I Read somewhere that this Bastard bought his son an apartment worth over a million pounds. Selfish Nest Feathering slimey shitbag. His witch of a wife was on newsnight once trying to justify why she bought her other son TWO FLATS.
She is a Greedy , self serving Hag faced Trollop who is also a patronising , condescending, shitbag frogeyed liar aswell.
321flyer 2 years ago 2
@321flyer well said mate 100% agree
with you hes evil to the core so is she
newall7 1 year ago
the worst thing he did is helping muslim extremists in britain,,,
argys1111 2 years ago
This man is beguiled by power and money , a complete Charlatan.....that's why he's a fully paid-up member of the Zionist cause and finds time in his ' busy ' schedule of one week per month in Jerusalem to accept money from his 'masters'. Example : 2 days after Israel IDF slaughtered 1300 arabs in Gaza he was in Tel Aviv accepting an award and a prize of $1 MILLION. At least Cherie was pleased !! I wonder if SHE spared a thought for the dead women and children whilst counting the money ?
AhmadAmor 2 years ago 2
I likwe Charlie Rose talking with everyone... He is great......
MarcusLeepapi 2 years ago
Politicians like Blair have always used the abstract nature of a 'higher power' to justify their evil deeds.
Franky000 2 years ago 10
I'm not sure I agree.. He has stated several times that religion doesn't have a big influence on his political beliefs, at least compared to G.W. Bush.
JeppeVJ 2 years ago
evil deeds? Removing a dictator who murdered and oppressed hundreds of thousands of his own people?
THthefirst 1 year ago
@Franky000 or are already in thrall to a 'higher power', but not one which you or I would call 'high'
JonnyInfinite 1 year ago
The Americans like him more than the British. The Yanks can fucking keep him, the lying cunt.
insomniajo 2 years ago 15
@insomniajo Good comment my friend,but can you tell me how is possible that the great British nation tolerate this layer for long time.
nedeljko18 10 months ago
globalisation is a bad idea, it will kill many cultures ... and make many ethnic problems!
dalefantom 2 years ago 2
wow, what a good little psychopath he is.
the25thman 2 years ago 5
This has been flagged as spam show
Blair blood on your hands motherfucker!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
princecharlesansooty 2 years ago
He is probably no satanist and not an initiate.
He's just another puppet frontman, he handed over the control of interest rates to the bank of england (rothschild) and lead his nation in a war.
and now he is rewarded by getting advisory positions at JPMorgan Chase and swiss banks. Seriously its so obvious...
And to think in his past he opposed the bank of england. I think somewhere in his career he got the offer to enforce their agenda and be payed generously or be killed/blackmailed/framed.
stabhappyj 2 years ago
he is a high ranking member in the order of the knights of malta,hes not just a puppet,hes a major player,not as big as the bankers,council of 13 or jesuits or rosicrucians but non the less a major player,time will prove that.
MoneyMaker4Ads 2 years ago
this is the most informed answer of all down this line and explains blair best of all.
BiffaTW 2 years ago
This SATANIST piece of shit wanna be witch asshole who has tried to push us all into tyranny should be struck by lightening talking about his faith,,,please Tony shut the fuck up we all know you and your wife are luciferian slime
candiceevans1 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I would help PBS but only of there we're not such liberal hippies....sigh
Snotra 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
What a scumbag.
He succeeded a doing what he went into politics to do: make a tonne of money.
Honestly, I don't know why Charlie - and Americans in general - seem so enamored by him.
jimbopumbapigsticks 2 years ago
well for one he did not mix religion and politics together, which spells disaster and prime example being BUSH.
he cant b n e worse then that wanker cameron honestly
jonno2019 2 years ago
You think you have to mix religion and politics together to be a complete disaster? I'm sure he rationalised his decision to go to war with the help of his naive religious beliefs.
And why do you think Cameron is a wanker?
jimbopumbapigsticks 2 years ago
your right, one does not have to mix religion and politics together to create disaster, unfortunately the UK did not have a choice but to assist the USA in their "coalition of the willing" due to a pact that has been in force since world war 1. I dont believe Blair had religious motivations to join the war in Iraq, the poor sod did not have a choice in the matter.
jonno2019 2 years ago
I believe his motivations came from his ego and his personal finances. He did have a choice - as much of a choice as France and Germany - but he didn't want to disconnect himself personally from the US. He knew that if he engendered goodwill there, he could milk that cow for all it's worth in public appearances and have a chance at being remembered as a great statesman. He isn't and he won't be.
jimbopumbapigsticks 2 years ago
well that may be a moot point but there was overwhelming disapproval of the war from the start so he could not have done it for his personal ego or to leave a lasting legacy.
He will be remembered for a few things such as brokering the northen ireland/ireland peace deal, passing of the human rights act, not to mention his admirable debate skills used in the house of commons.
jonno2019 2 years ago
how much slap is that twit wearing?
whalefish83 2 years ago
Thats true globalisation will happen. And a one world government, religion, and economic system. Its fact.
easilysaid 2 years ago
Globalisation is shit wanker, , you fucking dirty lying pig get back to George Bush'es scullery or his bedroom you little French Maid Blair, and no your "Sugar Daddy " George Bush can't make you total European President you fucking money grabbing warmongering dog
DerVampyrEngel 2 years ago
a religious man should not run a country and neither should gordon
cheekyegg 2 years ago 3
Why not?
Boonanzar 2 years ago
makes them impartial. bush is a christian and brown is depressed
cheekyegg 2 years ago 2
blair faithful! stop pulling my leg
mico2020 2 years ago 3
Win a war ? What the hell does that mean ? In my opinion only, no one wins a war ! For someone of Blair`s intellect, it is a remarkably childish notion that a war can be won !
morgandrim 2 years ago
He did omit that religion informed him on how to start a war, i guess that takes us back to bush rumsfeld etc a but Tony Blair is a well known socio path here in england along with peter mandelson, power mad if you ask me.
womblefree 2 years ago
you're all pathetic arguing on the internet, grow some balls you moochers
RetardedWelchee 2 years ago
This is called a discussion, not and argument. Grow some balls yourself and join us.
Boonanzar 2 years ago
I see you use my own words against me to try and start an argument which I stated I was against, grow up you childish fool.
RetardedWelchee 2 years ago
No, I simply think your point is complete rubbish! Oh no! We seem to be arguing!
Boonanzar 2 years ago
No, we're discussing thoughts with each other.
RetardedWelchee 2 years ago
anyone with a religious belief should certainly be restricted from positions of high political power. also, i do find it curious how tony blair, who is clearly an intelligent man, can truly believe in a God. i very much doubt he does believe in God in the conventional sense. one thing is for sure, his belief in the importance of religion for the continued moral guidance and control of the masses
willybarton 2 years ago
willybarton, i agree with you on the comment that he may not actually believe in God in the conventional sense. However, from your comments I assume that you do not believe. My question to you is, does it take more belief to believe in a divine being who created the universe, or more faith that just a occurence of events that had perfect timing from which everything came from. If you have ever worked on your car, what do you think the chance is it all come together? Can a car reassemble itself.
southchatguy 2 years ago
hello. yes you assume right, i am not a theist, and it confuses me why so many people are. The notion of everything 'coming together' like a car as you put it, isnt really a relevant question to me, i dont believe anything came together for us, we are just a by-product of a long chain of events. That we have been created in the image of our creator is absurd to me- more so with each day and each advance in the sciences Is merely having a faith enough for you? would you not like more answers?
willybarton 2 years ago
The events did not have perfect timing. Our solar system formed from an exploding star and thus the allocation of particles that make up our planet was completely random. The Earth is 4 billion years old and the human race is only 22000 years old. The evolution process was also random. Thus, our creation by no means was planned or controlled, unlike the development of a car. If God cannot intervene in events in the universe and no proof of one exists, why is he/she/it relevant?
Clearinator 2 years ago
just another sickening speach from blairs mouth,this time he uses his faith to justify killing over 200,000 iracis including women and children,i hope your fucking god is proud of you blair.
thedavewalkershow 2 years ago
Might want to learn to spell Iraq before you look like a retard..... too late.
ibbbbdfklbvjhiaerhbk 2 years ago
wierd, as soon as i was about to watch it i thought "he is going to say i think umm that", so close eh XD
mitchverr 2 years ago
Bautisnemo,
I'm sorry, but what a terrible diatribe you wrote. It's barely comprehensible, and proves my point.
Thank you, and goodnight.
TOAF1981 2 years ago
Tony Blair plays a major part in perpetrating an immoral and ILLEGAL war that kills tens of thousands of innocent civilians, and he has the cheek to lecture the world on religion?
Every time I hear him speak I throw up a little bit in my mouth.
He is without a doubt amongst the lowest form of life on this planet and he broke a new low for the British government whom I'd always respected in the past.
A truely horrible man.
liberaluk10 2 years ago 2
And you are a "truely" - btw, it's truly - horrible speller.
TOAF1981 2 years ago
The guy above you explained himself really well, with or without the need of grammatical corrections.
Bautisnemo 2 years ago
No, he/she doesn't. The rash claim that has been made is supported by one paragraph of poorly developed prose. To substantiate this claim requires an awareness of many factors. There is a dearth of anything intelligent in that remark, and it is this reactionary rubbish, which dissuades deep discussion - it's largely the province of immaturity.
I seek no fight, but I seek substance.
It's quite embarrassing that you would be swayed by the junk he/she wrote.
TOAF1981 2 years ago
What it's quite embarrassing is the fact that you're supporting a war criminal. Therefore if you seek substance then go to Abu Graib or Basora and ask natives about Blair's brilliant vocabulary and nice bombs.
I'm not swayed by the junk anybody wrote, I'm swayed by the fact you seem to support the horrible politican which brought the world to an unnecesary war supported by two retarded neocons Bush and Aznar.
And now you can go and drink your tea in buckingham palace.
Bautisnemo 2 years ago
i can read what they have said fine, maybe you should learn to read more effectively?
mitchverr 2 years ago
Tony Blair is a Global Fascist Slave Master THUG. They are treasonous Terrorists to freedom
SupraSovereign 2 years ago
So, cheddyrod, are these people "dumb" for beliving in God or not? Yes or No? Newton, Pasteur, Einstein, Michaelangelo, Copernicus, Bacon, Kepler , Galileo, Descartes, Boyle, Faraday, Mendel and many others. Yes or No?
gladiator3543 2 years ago
"cheddyrod" said "bright people cannot have religious faith", he therefore thinks he is more intelligent than Newton, Pasteur, Einstein, Michaelangelo, Copernicus, Bacon, Kepler , Galileo, Descartes, Boyle, Faraday, Mendel and countless others. How about that eh?
gladiator3543 2 years ago
Einstein said that religion was childish and primitive. Why did he say that?
cheddyrod 2 years ago
"Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind."
Albert Einstein, "Science, Philosophy and Religion: a Symposium", 1941
gladiator3543 2 years ago
That is what is said at the precipice of WW II. He had to say that because of political reasons. Now answer the question. Why did Einstein say religion was childish and primitive?
cheddyrod 2 years ago
cheddyrod, are these people "dumb" for beliving in God or not? Yes or No? Newton, Pasteur, Einstein, Michaelangelo, Copernicus, Bacon, Kepler , Galileo, Descartes, Boyle, Faraday, Mendel and many others. Yes or No?
gladiator3543 2 years ago
1. I do know about Einstein's views on religion and how they affected his scientific work and it is his scientific work that I am mainly interested in. The others that you mentioned I have no interest in investigating whether they were or were not religious and which religion if any they followed.
cheddyrod 2 years ago
2. Now getting back to Einstein, why did he say that religion was childish and primitive? When you answer that question you can also answer this question. What troubled Einstein about his Quantum Theory and did his Quantum Theory affect his views on religions? If you read the works of the three philosophers that I previously had mentioned you wouldnt ask such inane questions.
cheddyrod 2 years ago
I'm sorry, this isnt just about one Scientist, no matter how much you wish to skew this debate. Einstein wasn't, unlike you, an athiest. It was you who said anyone who believe in God is dim; are you prepared to withdraw that statement or not?
gladiator3543 2 years ago
You are the one who brought scientists into this argument. I didn't mention God. You did. You do not understand the difference between belief, true belief and knowledge and until you know the difference you will continue to write garbage and SKEW this argument all over hell's half acre. I never said Einstein was an atheist. There is little point in continuing this argument until you become educated. Find out something about Einstein and not just his interview in Time.
cheddyrod 2 years ago
You did say bright people cannot have religious beliefs, or are you now denying that? I have quite easily demonstrated that many, many bright people, many of them among the most prominment scientists in history also were religious men. According to your reasoning they are "dim." That's what you said, and now you can't defend it becuase you know you are wrong.
gladiator3543 2 years ago
Isn't Tony Bliar going to be the President of the EU? Is that the prize he received for covering up the 7/7 London Bombings!
Bastard!
UKNWOLee 2 years ago
Richard Dawkins is quite correct when he described Tony as not being very bright.
cheddyrod 2 years ago
No, it's just that it irritates Dawkins that bright people can have religious faith.
gladiator3543 2 years ago
That is a contradiction. Blair believes but beliefs are not knowledge. Blair believed that Iraq had WMDs but the knowledge was that there was none. Blair believes there is a Christian God and the knowledge is that there isn't a Christian God. Bright people cannot have religious faith because it is a ridiculous concept and an oxymoron.
cheddyrod 2 years ago
Absolute arrogant rubbish. "Bright people cannot have religious faith", would you include Newton, Einstien, Michaelangelo,... Furhtermore, for a "bright" person, you don't seem to know the difference between knowledge and faith.
gladiator3543 2 years ago
Look up Platos and Socrates arguments for and against the ideas that true belief (true faith) is knowledge. Also read Edmund Gettiers arguments that true faith is not knowledge. All of this should have been covered in your introductory philosophy class. If and when you understand these arguments your silly idea that true faith is knowledge will become clear. These arguments should be clear to anyone who has reasonable intellectual capacity.
cheddyrod 2 years ago
No, you don't seem to be able to grasp the simple understanding, that faith and knowledge are different concepts. Once again the Dawkins disciplies setting up a straw man; no one is saying faith is knowledge apart from you. And please answer my earlier point; you say "bright people cannot have religious faith" where does this leave Newton, Einstein and many many others?
gladiator3543 2 years ago
You obviously have never studied philosophy. Do some research into the conflict that Einstein's religious faith and the knowledge he gained caused him in his later years. When Einstein was young he was trained to believe in religion and when he got older that training caused him a great deal of conflict. All animals can be trained and that has nothing to do with intelligence. When you understand my previous post you will understand. There is a relationship between beliefs and knowledge .
cheddyrod 2 years ago
If you read Edmund Gettiers, Plato and Socrates you will understand the relationship between faith and knowledge. When you have finished reading these get back to me.
cheddyrod 2 years ago
For a third time; you wrote: "bright people cannot have religious faith" where does this leave Newton, Einstein and many many others?
gladiator3543 2 years ago
I'll give you a hand since you are finding this difficult. There are 2 possible answers:
1. The likes of Newton and Einstein are not "bright" since they had religiious faith.
2. The likes of Newton and Eistein are bright and your point is demonstrably false.
Which is it?
gladiator3543 2 years ago
Much has been written about Einsteins views on religion. Some Einstein wrote and some have been falsely attributed to him. In Einsteins latter years he did state religious beliefs are childish and primitive. Is that news to you? If you had read Edmund Gettiers, Plato and Socrates like I asked you too you might become a little less dim. Until you learn the basics of philosophy you will never hope to become bright.
cheddyrod 2 years ago
Eistein believed in God, and that's a fact as did numerous other geniuses, and that is also a fact. Which means you are wrong in your statement. So are we to assume that unless we agree with you we are "dim"? Get over yourself please.
gladiator3543 2 years ago
You are a liar. Piss off!
cheddyrod 2 years ago
I'll take the option for personal abuse as an implicit admission you have run out of "arguments."
gladiator3543 2 years ago
You are a liar. When you distort the truth and use lies there is no point in continuing the argument. I gave no personal abuse. You lied and that makes you a liar.
cheddyrod 2 years ago
And this coming from the person who says Newton, Einstein and others are 'dim' becuase of their religious beliefs; I think i'm in good company.
gladiator3543 2 years ago
You said Einstein believed in God. You lied. Einstein said that religion was childish and primitive. Einstein was not dim. You are.
cheddyrod 2 years ago
I'm sorry to have to contradict you once more, but Einstein wasn't an athiest, look up the interview he gave to Time magazine. And what do you have to say about Newton, Pasteur, Copernicus, Marconi, Kant, Hume....all believied in God, they also on your dim list? You're a biggot.
gladiator3543 2 years ago
Why did Einstein say that religion was childish and primitive?
cheddyrod 2 years ago
Why did he say "i'm not an athiest"? Are you still saying all religious people are dim or have you withdrawn that?
gladiator3543 2 years ago
Einstein said that religion was childish and primitive. Why did he say that?
cheddyrod 2 years ago
Hi Tony Evil Blair! Bye Tony Evil Blair!
RealTrueTarget 2 years ago
Blair's always up to no good.
capricious71 3 years ago
blair made the world a worse place by following america
thatcheritescot 3 years ago
Damn, Charlie Rose's American English is pollution to the ears! wonder what Blair was thinking during this interview.
georgexxx83 3 years ago
Yes,I find his "yee haw" accent hilarious.
capricious71 3 years ago
man he look soo old
connaught2008 3 years ago
Globalization will never be a true reality because every country has its own culture and its traditions but I think that a meltingpot in a country is absoulutely necessery but I just don't want to see mc donalds or sushis bars remplacing french restaurant in my country ! our food is quite better than buggers isn't it ? LOL
charlyinthespace91 3 years ago
Most people are never smart. No matter what country it would be. People are not equal thus intellectual elite is always a minority. College degree means nothing nowadays.
If religion leaders are good enough they teach that religion is not about killing each other. Anyway nevermind, I'm an atheist from a country where it's regarded as sth really negative (catholic Poland) so I don't care about religion till it doesn't harm me.
asmodeus585 3 years ago
"Your founders said they're not going 2 repeat European mistakes & want to live in peace in their own continent, didn't they?"
That was isolationist speaking in the 18th century . Today the 'Global Village' makes that impossible . "When the rights of one man are threatened the rights of all men are in peril" . Pretty simple concept to understand that people avoid like the plauge because they have no answer to the problem that the only price that freedom will accept is blood . Live w/it .
cdddraftsman 3 years ago
'Global village' is just an ideological bullshit. I don't want USA go to Poland no matter what would happen there. And as far as I am concerned politicians always go to war with some of their interest they do not declare a war just because someone seems dangerous to their country. And non-inteventionism is not the same as isolationism. It's good that USA entered WW2 and helped UK but I don't like seeing american troops in Somalia/etc.
asmodeus585 3 years ago
"It's so offensive the way ppl of "faith" claim monopoly on spiritualism & morality"
Wait untill the cry's of terror come to your town after a bomb explodes , you'll be "offended" even more when you see the after effects of zealots with a apocalyptic vision of the future , were hero's are in martyrdom.
cdddraftsman 3 years ago
What I mean is that most people are stupid and they need religion. Religion is a stabilizer and keeps society in order. Religion was founded by politicians - in ancient times religion leaders were rulers and vice versa. Anyone that is intelligent enough don't believe it - but also know that it is good for common people. When there's no faith people start to seek security from government, thus socialistic ideas seem for them to be good, etc.
asmodeus585 3 years ago
I don't think world needs less religion - though I'm an atheist - it is good when normal people has some stable moral values to follow. They just have a better leaders that will explain to them that their religion is not about violence.
And if there's no religion people start believing in anything like Big Brother or UFOs, only a few are intelligent enough to find values for themselves like Nietzsche once said.
asmodeus585 3 years ago
We had to go to war, there was no choice, so stop moeaning and face it. it you wish to blame someone is to blame the terroist. Tony the man that can!
CynicallyBritish 3 years ago
What the terrotists have to do with Iraq? The war on terror was the oen in Afghanistan after 9/11 - Iraq was just a kid's play fo Bush.
I wonder why Bush wants to restore democracy only in Iraq don't care about Belaraus for example - because it was one of the main issue, wasn't it? 'Promoting democracy in the world' - what a crap.
asmodeus585 3 years ago
"I wonder y Bush wants 2 restore democracy only in Iraq ... Promoting democracy in the world - what a crap"
The war in Iraq was about getting rid of a man who tried 2 kill GHWB & destabilise the Gulf region by attacking Iran & Kuwait, gasing the Kurds .
That wasn't so bad but when he got close 2 Saudi Arabia thru Kuwait , IMO it was time 2 act . Hussien was a man of big ambitions & evil : See the video 'The Fires of Kuwait' were he ruined the ecology 4 yrs 2 come .
cdddraftsman 3 years ago
OK, but you will agree that America wasn't founded to be interested in the world affairs? Your founders said they're not going to repeat European mistakes and want to live in peace in theie own continent, didn't they?
And I don't oppose this war a priori - I am only concerned about this bullshit that media trying to tell us. And 'restoring democracy'was one of the most common lie I heard on TV.
Besides, think globally, act locally.
asmodeus585 3 years ago
Tony Blair should be charged with crimes of misleading the U.K on the war on Iraq. this is why we sacked him. he will be held accountable.
from a U.K citizen
minteko 3 years ago
It's so offensive the way people of "faith" claim monopoly on spiritualism and morality, as if secular works of art and a science based morality (like saving women and children from AIDS by distributing condoms in Africa) doesn't even exist.
madashelldude 3 years ago 2
@madashelldude
America does not need people haters and political bigots like you. America is a place of diversity and individuality that welcomes all kinds of differing people and their differing ideas - including Conservatives and Republicans. Take your stereotyped hatred against millions & millions of Americans and leave this nation now you stupendous OAF
!
Hail2theRepubs 8 months ago
zeroman
beatelman 3 years ago
Blair seems smart, eloquent, and charismatic.
Makes you almost forget that he is, along with Bush, responsible for what happened in Iraq...
fuhrerschein2008 3 years ago 2
Intelligent people are not necessarily good, even if they enounce how religious they are.
Imho - Blair is a very talented politician, sth rather quite rare nowadays, but he is not a guy I'd like have as a friend - I don't like cynic people. Cynic in a recent understanding, of course, because the ancient meaning was far more noble.
asmodeus585 3 years ago
Whether you agree with his politics or not, there aren't many people who are more impressive in the world.
urcky 3 years ago
I do not think he belives in this faith ****.....religion is the best remedy for an ignorant wo cant comprehend the fact that our world is milions of years old and life has existed lllllllllllllooooooooooooooooooong b4 jesus phenomen....
bcQike 3 years ago
Five hundred years from now, Historians will say, when did Anglo-America begin to fray
such was the day
when Tony Blair had his way
8data 3 years ago
Well done. =)
asmodeus585 3 years ago
Hes a good politician, bad leader
Dont be fooled by his demeanor, he had other choices
no one was putting his feet to the fire to join USA in
its quixotic stupidity, he should not have chased waterfalls
it was not in his nature.
8data 3 years ago 2
Cash for Dishonour.
8data 3 years ago
Err, mould of its Colonial Office.
ludachris475 3 years ago
Britain in fact has two governments, one a parliamentary charade for the edification of the credulous, the other the real monarchial government of the Queen and her Privy Council.
500 people under the Queen run the British Empire, including the mou;d of its old Colonial Office, which was never abandoned. It is the Overseas Development Office now. The Crown Agents who ran the colonies still function. They operate whole countries around the world. The mercenary forces in Africa are British.
ludachris475 3 years ago
So that's what Bambi Blair is up to these days? Pontificating, preening & lying to a US audience.
No change there then.
How depressing to witness this arch hypocrite & liar still spouting his Neo Labour right wing garbage. Globalisation is not bringing anyone together...it is driving the World apart with its exploitation & profiteering. Look how old this fey little lickspittle looks in his girl's pink tie. "God told me to"...yes, blame God for hundreds of thousands of corpses you weak coward.
abusivecomments 3 years ago
Yeah you;ve got bloody Obama destroying your country
ashamed3333 3 years ago
Globalisation, another term for global order.
Sure, it may sound wonderful at first, but it is only severl years through progess when one sees the real chaos globalisation creates. It only benefits the ultra rich and coporations.
Consumerofknowledge 3 years ago
"Doing the right thing when it may not turn out to be the popular thing"
Like calling off an investigation into the Saudi arms deal Tony? Hypocrite.
CM1032 3 years ago
i think he is brilliant and did a super job as pm for the uk and also on a globle scale!
jonbob1 3 years ago 2
Very few people agree with you & those that do don't live in the UK.
abusivecomments 3 years ago
glob scale
globs of money for his buddies
8data 3 years ago
tony the paper tiger, what a flaming arsehole
puppet for the new world order.
jackinla8 3 years ago
Tony lost her spirit in Catholicism, he need to repent and understnd Who is Jesus really and baptize into the water to be saved...my suggestion Tony, go to a Penticostal Church where you can be born again
agapelove4you 3 years ago
Chat shite when did he ever have faith, a good politician no doubt he is a leader.
Thetruthisone 3 years ago 2
As a good ole' Brit would say:
Load of bollocks.
rfcbeilfuss 3 years ago
tony blair knows how to talk a load of bullshit. hes an asshole, but good at bullshitting.
sammygee17 3 years ago
He is a worthless war propagandist.
ludachris475 3 years ago
I hope he gets eaten by an elephant.
ludachris475 3 years ago
Hes still a compelling person. Not an ethical person, but compelling.
8data 3 years ago
Oh, please, Tony Blair is an eager puppet, a demogogic opportunist, and a bawdy rapscallion to boot.
He is the hemorrhoid of Parliament.
ludachris475 3 years ago
I agree with your assessment of him as compelling. Whether for good or ill he seems a very able communicator
thatdrattedcat 2 years ago
its talk anyone is capable of
your just looking for something to
believe in. hes a greedy person
i doubt god will agree with some of things
this person does
newall7 2 years ago
How the Left has descended. Instead of rational premises and conclusions, they parrot words like "evil, bad, greed and hate" like a 1st grade argument. Leftist cant grasp that their freedom to criticize the government is forbidden in societies they praise. Once the Berlin Wall came tumbling down, you'd think they'd concede the disaster Marxism was and note that capitalism flourishes. But Communist rhetoric still flows and makes a new movement in global warming, environmentalist nonsense.
jkirk1626 3 years ago
i don't really see how global warming and environmentalism are leftist arguments. Freedom to critisise governments is inherent