SuperSense by Bruce M. Hood

[JuliiannaCh]

I LOVE YOU ♥ and your book ..

[ksmith1164]

I just finished reading this book and I enjoyed it very much.

[blueeye007]

supernatural or not... what is supernatural? Is remote viewing supernatural??? Many would say it is. I learned it from a man teaching it for 20 years in FBI. I am not supernatural but after i learned his technique I saw and heared as well as smelled things which where my target I literarly described it and painted it. I belive in remote viewing because I suprised myself that those abillities are learnable by everyone.

[eoosen]

cogito2, you're supporting Hood's thesis.

[brucehood9]

They might but I doubt it as it would require a complete revision of our current scientific understanding. Simply put these demonstrations do not reliably replicate. If they did, there would be a Nobel Prize in it for the discover, not to mention a huge wad of cash. No I wonder what I would remote view?????

[cogito2]

Some people are working on such a revision -- such things do happen, and fundamental physics is in quite a state of disarray at this time. Taking up your argument though, since what is commonly characterised as 'falling in love' is something that is hard to reproduce reliably, should we conclude that people who believe that it does happen are deluding themselves? Or do different rules apply there?

[gregmuffinman]

where is their any other information about these supernatural beliefs, it seems like this book is the only research

[cogito2]

Re supersense: When the BBC tried to replicate remote viewing, in a programme in which I had a part, the drawings and narratives produced by their research assistant as viewer seem to fit remarkably well what was at the actual location, picked out of 4 in just one trial (to see a clip, search at Google Video for Successful Remote Viewing Experiment on TV). How do you explain that, Bruce: illusory correlation, fluke, fraud by the BBC? Or might some people actually be able to view things remotely?