WTC Towers... not so much. We ran a lot of analysis in our steel courses in college, and tested out a lot of these conspiracy theories-- shaped charges weren't the cause, primarily because it would have been too impractical and obvious. Controlled demolitions are a lot of work, and certainly not invisible. For example a controlled implosion, steel cables are installed at a diagonal ceiling to floor within the structure to control its path down.
And come on, it's the Federal Government. Do you honestly believe they are organized enough to keep a secret of this magnitude with so many organizations/people involved? For crying out loud, the CIA couldn't even PLANT WMDs in Iraq to justify the president's concerns! lol
The one instance of that day that I'm suspicious about is the Pentagon strike... no footage, and it would have taken one hell of a pilot to pull that off
Of course it's not some rediculously convoluted and complicated plot by the Federal Government. Geeze. Okam's Razor man.
The Pentagon is one big fucking building. Hitting it would by NP. Scores of motorists saw the plane. "Rivers jet fuel" flowing down corridors accounted for some of the burn victims. These conspiracy theorists are scary stupid. They are even allowed to vote!
How much more debris needs to be found to convince people the plane did, in fact, hit the Pentagon? I don't need a video. Pilots agree that Hani Hanjor (sp) was more that able to pull off what he did. Even Bernard Marcell, the instructor who trained Hani said he was capable of it.
I've heard from VERY reliable sources (A friend of a friend's wife's brother in law) that the 9/11 American Air Lines jets landed in Guantanamo where they offloaded the original passengers. The "Al Qaeda hijackers" were drugged, placed aboard, and the planes were really flown by remote.
The "original" passengers were waterboarded FOR A YEAR, until they said they wouldn't tell...
The details don' t matter than much. The whole point of the operation was to create a reason for attacking. Standard practice. Those people are always calculating how they can get the public to go along with what they want to get done.
Now all that is over with. Some very reliable people have been talking about how they will try to attack Sudan and Pakistan next. Thats the plan of the new crew. They are already trying to imprison Bashir. Time will tell.
You are too fucking stupid to see the dripping sarcasm in my reply. Oh yeah! The GOVERNMENT did it! For an EXCUSE! The details of the OPERATION AREN'T important! Poor Sudan! Please God don't let them be NEXT!! LOL
Sarcasm would be over your head because you are too dumb to recognize it.
I am in the Air Force, and was on 9/11. I live in Colorado Springs. Guess where NORAD is? Cheyanne Mountain baby! We were not set up to quickly intercept airliners on 9/11.
"missed that WON" Don't you mean "ONE"? Is English your first language? Do you have a High School Diploma? LOL Fucking morons...
No, they didn't jump off the plane right before it crashed. One plausible theory, however, would be that the planes were remotely controlled drone planes with explosives on-board. Don't think this could happen? Think again. This technology was actually invented in the 50's. In operation Northwoods, the CIA talked about using drone planes with explosives on-board to stage a hijacking as a prefix for war against Cuba, in conjunction with a NYC/D.C. bombing campaign. Quit drinking the flouride.
dont you think the equipment would be too large to just bring in the pilots cabin, abnd before that just walking through airport security. Or do you think the airlines are compromised, and they want theyre stocks to drop ground low. What youre saying is just a circle argument. Because whta youre saying is- this happened because in some cicumstances in 50s it was possible.
Equipment? What equipment? The real commercial planes could have landed at some military strip and a painted drone with explosives on them could have been sent up into the air. Once again, this is exactly what the CIA wanted to do in operation northwoods. You wouldn't need to bring any equipment. I believe these men, hired by the CIA, went through the same airport security and the actual planes took off with them, then they landed at a strip and then drones were sent up. It happened before.
this information would have came up. i shall not ask why CIA would do this, because (i bet) youre fulll of such arguements. still youre saying that a shaped charge was involved, and a repainted airplain with "a drone", hit the WTC. CIA was involved in hijacking, repainting, planting shaped charges, and managing to build in a drone, in a plane, which then was piloted with a remote control. U underestimate a group fundamentalists, thats your problem.
The fact that you said the flights were monitored just made my side of the arguement even stronger. If they were monitored that strictly, then it would not have taken NORAD so long to act. Most of the so-called 'debunkers' say they did not monitor the jets properly. Come on, even if you don't believe my theory, you'd at least know why they'd do such a thing if it were an 'inside job.' Simple. They needed a pretext for war, just like CUBA. Fundamentalists? You mean Al-CIA-da, who we trained?
Furthermore, if ypu believe these 'terrorists' attacked us because we are free then I have a bridge I want to sell you. Maybe you should learn about the history of Iraq and Iran and how we overthrew their governments and put in dictators who killed their own people, like the Shah(operation Ajax). The CIA talked about painting drone plains and making it look like a commercial plane in oepration northwoods, which was in 153. It CAN and HAS happened before.
youre right about the pretext for war. i never said al qaeda. i said " a group of fundamentalists". there is no al qaeda. although there are extremists. plainjackings, and bombings happened more often than "civilian painted, drone piloted, 747". i never knew what happened. if you believe that you know than cheers. you are a believer.
how many planes were hijacked that day? 10? dont you think that some of them left a huge pile of ruble to analise for non-compromised officers of the law?
Arguing with retarded "conspiracy nuts" is a waste of typing. NORAD is NOT poised to intercept stray air liners. Did we go to war with Cuba? Must have missed that won. Maybe the CIA will do us all a favor and inject these morons with some magic "higher IQ brain formula".
WTC Towers... not so much. We ran a lot of analysis in our steel courses in college, and tested out a lot of these conspiracy theories-- shaped charges weren't the cause, primarily because it would have been too impractical and obvious. Controlled demolitions are a lot of work, and certainly not invisible. For example a controlled implosion, steel cables are installed at a diagonal ceiling to floor within the structure to control its path down.
rabidteddy 3 years ago
And come on, it's the Federal Government. Do you honestly believe they are organized enough to keep a secret of this magnitude with so many organizations/people involved? For crying out loud, the CIA couldn't even PLANT WMDs in Iraq to justify the president's concerns! lol
The one instance of that day that I'm suspicious about is the Pentagon strike... no footage, and it would have taken one hell of a pilot to pull that off
rabidteddy 3 years ago
Of course it's not some rediculously convoluted and complicated plot by the Federal Government. Geeze. Okam's Razor man.
The Pentagon is one big fucking building. Hitting it would by NP. Scores of motorists saw the plane. "Rivers jet fuel" flowing down corridors accounted for some of the burn victims. These conspiracy theorists are scary stupid. They are even allowed to vote!
gedgar2000 3 years ago
How much more debris needs to be found to convince people the plane did, in fact, hit the Pentagon? I don't need a video. Pilots agree that Hani Hanjor (sp) was more that able to pull off what he did. Even Bernard Marcell, the instructor who trained Hani said he was capable of it.
vnvnation20006 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I've heard from VERY reliable sources (A friend of a friend's wife's brother in law) that the 9/11 American Air Lines jets landed in Guantanamo where they offloaded the original passengers. The "Al Qaeda hijackers" were drugged, placed aboard, and the planes were really flown by remote.
The "original" passengers were waterboarded FOR A YEAR, until they said they wouldn't tell...
True Story!!
gedgar2000 3 years ago
The details don' t matter than much. The whole point of the operation was to create a reason for attacking. Standard practice. Those people are always calculating how they can get the public to go along with what they want to get done.
Now all that is over with. Some very reliable people have been talking about how they will try to attack Sudan and Pakistan next. Thats the plan of the new crew. They are already trying to imprison Bashir. Time will tell.
gosciu555 3 years ago
You are too fucking stupid to see the dripping sarcasm in my reply. Oh yeah! The GOVERNMENT did it! For an EXCUSE! The details of the OPERATION AREN'T important! Poor Sudan! Please God don't let them be NEXT!! LOL
gedgar2000 3 years ago
Dripping sarcasm what in the fuck are you talking about, you're a dumbass.
"NORAD is NOT poised to intercept stray air liners"
Wrong. Shows how "smart" you are.
"Must have missed that won. "
You're just spoiling us aren't you, haha.
gosciu555 3 years ago
Sarcasm would be over your head because you are too dumb to recognize it.
I am in the Air Force, and was on 9/11. I live in Colorado Springs. Guess where NORAD is? Cheyanne Mountain baby! We were not set up to quickly intercept airliners on 9/11.
"missed that WON" Don't you mean "ONE"? Is English your first language? Do you have a High School Diploma? LOL Fucking morons...
gedgar2000 3 years ago
Who said that? Dylan Avery or Jason Bermas? Oh, I know, it was Alex Jones. Funny.
vnvnation20006 2 years ago
LOL. your all sheep. albeit ones that can thinkand rationalize, but still sheeps none the less.lol
GoldenShaolinNutz 3 years ago
Thats what they used on 9/11 alright.
JackNeedles 4 years ago
yeah! those bastardars jumped of the plane right before the impact, and placed a charge, whick was detonated by the plane crash. get over it
flach99 4 years ago
No, they didn't jump off the plane right before it crashed. One plausible theory, however, would be that the planes were remotely controlled drone planes with explosives on-board. Don't think this could happen? Think again. This technology was actually invented in the 50's. In operation Northwoods, the CIA talked about using drone planes with explosives on-board to stage a hijacking as a prefix for war against Cuba, in conjunction with a NYC/D.C. bombing campaign. Quit drinking the flouride.
JackNeedles 3 years ago
dont you think the equipment would be too large to just bring in the pilots cabin, abnd before that just walking through airport security. Or do you think the airlines are compromised, and they want theyre stocks to drop ground low. What youre saying is just a circle argument. Because whta youre saying is- this happened because in some cicumstances in 50s it was possible.
flach99 3 years ago
Equipment? What equipment? The real commercial planes could have landed at some military strip and a painted drone with explosives on them could have been sent up into the air. Once again, this is exactly what the CIA wanted to do in operation northwoods. You wouldn't need to bring any equipment. I believe these men, hired by the CIA, went through the same airport security and the actual planes took off with them, then they landed at a strip and then drones were sent up. It happened before.
JackNeedles 3 years ago
all the flights are very strictly monitored.
this information would have came up. i shall not ask why CIA would do this, because (i bet) youre fulll of such arguements. still youre saying that a shaped charge was involved, and a repainted airplain with "a drone", hit the WTC. CIA was involved in hijacking, repainting, planting shaped charges, and managing to build in a drone, in a plane, which then was piloted with a remote control. U underestimate a group fundamentalists, thats your problem.
flach99 3 years ago
The fact that you said the flights were monitored just made my side of the arguement even stronger. If they were monitored that strictly, then it would not have taken NORAD so long to act. Most of the so-called 'debunkers' say they did not monitor the jets properly. Come on, even if you don't believe my theory, you'd at least know why they'd do such a thing if it were an 'inside job.' Simple. They needed a pretext for war, just like CUBA. Fundamentalists? You mean Al-CIA-da, who we trained?
JackNeedles 3 years ago
Furthermore, if ypu believe these 'terrorists' attacked us because we are free then I have a bridge I want to sell you. Maybe you should learn about the history of Iraq and Iran and how we overthrew their governments and put in dictators who killed their own people, like the Shah(operation Ajax). The CIA talked about painting drone plains and making it look like a commercial plane in oepration northwoods, which was in 153. It CAN and HAS happened before.
JackNeedles 3 years ago
youre right about the pretext for war. i never said al qaeda. i said " a group of fundamentalists". there is no al qaeda. although there are extremists. plainjackings, and bombings happened more often than "civilian painted, drone piloted, 747". i never knew what happened. if you believe that you know than cheers. you are a believer.
how many planes were hijacked that day? 10? dont you think that some of them left a huge pile of ruble to analise for non-compromised officers of the law?
flach99 3 years ago
Arguing with retarded "conspiracy nuts" is a waste of typing. NORAD is NOT poised to intercept stray air liners. Did we go to war with Cuba? Must have missed that won. Maybe the CIA will do us all a favor and inject these morons with some magic "higher IQ brain formula".
gedgar2000 3 years ago
Flach99, quit being a sheeple and wake up. Start by researching the truth. 9/11 = inside job. Period.
1776in2008 3 years ago
Is that a new STD...thought aids was bad
jsmallwood2007 4 years ago
damn, wonder if home made or military
gosciu555 4 years ago
That looked like one of the shaped charges that I saw in Korea.
defenderofliberty 4 years ago