@max8xxxzzz .Read below first. Ravana is the follower of siva.- yes it is. buy why he took sita. this concept is to explain no matter how great you are if you don't have discipline and morals in your life you will punished . so it is not the screen play to comments. you have to understand the concept and meaning behind the any activities. not only ramayanam, Our forefathers are great 100 times more knowledgeable than us. you die die also you can find fault .encourage others to read
@max8xxxzzz you have to read the complete Ramayanam to understand and to find out the answers for your questions. by watching few episodes of tv series you can not come to any conclusion. Rama pleased monkey - answer- " This concept is to explain to every human being have to love animals and every animal has their own skills and power. 2nd. Rama killed vaali- The answer -this concept to explain that there is no justice to any human who took other's wife. - understand?
@max8xxxzzz Don't post the same comment in multiple videos - make it to the point. As I mentioned in the Kumbhakarna falling asleep in battlefield thread, Sita never crossed any line, Vali had a boon to get half of his enemy's strength if he fought, and Ravan being a bhakt of Mahadev has nothing to do w/ whether Ramayan is fake.
How can one be a "partial incarnaton?" Either you are or you aren't, right? How can Hanuman be a partial incarnation of Shiva? I think there is something wrong here.
There used to be a race of monkey people complete with tails, etc. They are no longer with us. They must have been all killed off? Are there no skeletons in the area of monkey people in Shri Lanka to prove this? The land bridge is there and can be seen from satellite view....it is on Google maps. It is called Adams Bridge.
@maricarbo Partial incarnation means that when the avatar is there, the original god is still there in his abode: Shiva didn't disappear from Kailash when Hanuman was created, and Hanuman is immortal and doesn't affect Shiva's presense there. But when Rama & Krishna were on earth, Vishnu was not in Vaikuntha (unlike what some serials show) and so, in that way, they were complete avatars. In other words, in order to get Vishnu back, Rama had to be persuaded to end his avatar
well, what I dont understand is how could Rava's Rath be in Skies after His sarathy was killed? could Ravan control His Chariot and get engaged in Battle at The same Time?
@humbleRaj Vibhishan's wife is Sarama. Trijata was described in some accounts as his daughter, but not all, she was a common Rakshashi. In Krittivas Ramayan, Vibhishan & Sarama had a son Taranisen, who was sent by Ravan to fight Rama, and died fighting him, even though he worshipped Rama, since he wanted to be freed of the cycles of re-birth, which happens if one gets killed by Narayan or Mahadev
@humbleRaj Some of the books are available online, like valmikiramayan . net (does not include the Uttarkand, last I looked) and mahabharataonline . com. Other places you might find them are sacredtexts . com
According to The Books I read, It is Maathili who advises SriRam to use Agneyastrato dry up Amrit in Nabi and then use Bramhastra to kill Ravan. But, this version shows its Vibhishan who informs Ravan about Ravan's Secret
I don't know why the scriptures say that Shiva and Brama, Vishnu and Rama are different entities. I know them as being the same entity, just different incarnations.
For example, Krishna and Buddha are another two incarnations of the same list. You can find all of that in the listings of 1001 names of Krishna, or 1001 names of Rama, or just pick any one of them and do a search...I don't see Hanuman as an incarnaton of Rama because he was on the earth when Rama was...and you can't be split in 2
@maricarbo I think it's a tad presumptious to assume that what you know is more true than the scriptures - that's what you seem to be saying.
Buddha is listed as an avatar in some, but not all versions of Dasha avatar. He misses a lot of the characterestics of Vishnu, and also, it's not evident that he was listed as an avatar b4 his appearance, the way Kalki is.
Hanuman was a partial avatar of Shiva, not of Rama or Vishnu.
@maricarbo The scriptures do have Brahma, Vishnu & Shiva being different entities. Hanuman was derived from a bone from Shiva's limbs, but the important aspect about him - unlike Rama, who ceased to be in Vaikuntha when he was on earth, Hanuman existed and exists on earth the same time that Shiva does. In other words, Hanuman is immortal, but not a complete avatar in that Shiva still exists as a separate entity!!!
Anyone is free to write or make there own ideas about such puranas that does not mean they are correct. People with wisdom always stick or quote the righteous author. To write ramyana after reading original version is easy go for poets like kamban but to create one such own means real capability or blessing. Only 2 version of ramayan is right 1st is adi ramayan or valmiki ramayan next is tulasi ramayan. Plz note tulasi das has not written anything else expect just translated it into hindi.
@samlivi Tulsidas didn't even USE Valmiki for his sourcing - he used Vyasa's Adhyatma Ramayan. His version is very different - like on who used the Shakti on Lakshman, how the payasa was divided b/w KKS, where did Parashurama encounter Rama, the Lakshman Rekha (not there in Valmiki), and so on.
I agree w/ you though - Valmiki is the original, and authentic author: others are just starters of derivative sects. Vashistha is said to have written a version, and if true, that would be on par.
It is also said that Bajrang Bali, Mahvir Hanuman Ji has Authoured A Ramayan around the same time as Maharshi Valmiki. However, it seems Valmiki felt sad that Hanuman's version was better than His own and to make sure that Valmiki remains Adi Kavi, Hanuman tore His Version. For this Valmiki felt ashamed and in His Next Avatar as "Tulsi Das" Composed Hanuman Chalisa
@humbleRaj I've heard of this one, but it's more an act of belief, since there are huge differences b/w Valmiki & Tulsidas. In fact, Tulsidas follows the Adhyatma Ramayan, written by Vyasa or one of his disciples/sons. I think the Hanuman influencing Tulsidas is just an attempt by some to lend legitimacy to someone whose version was written in Kalyug, or else, nobody would have believed it over the writings of Valmiki, who alone was given the boon by Brahma on the immortality of the Ramayan
I don't think even kamban has written such controversial matters. Then Banasur was a adharmi who was doing all nonsense because of lord shiva boon. So lord Shiva deliberately let lost the battle with sri krishna and appeared as if he was in sleep because of mohna astra send my krishna. Plz note all destructive astras originate frm Lord shiva he is sole master of destruction Plz read .Sri Bagavatham written by Sage Suha son Of Sage Vayasa author of mahabaratham.
uploader should read valmiki ramayan 1st and also know what does kothandam means in tamil 1st.. Rama was given the bow called VISHNAV DANUSH by sage agasthya at time of vanvas and before battel between rama & ravana sage agasthya gave him the upadesha of SRI ADITYA HRIDAYAM which protected rama as a spiritual armor during the batter. With request from lord bhrama , Indra send his chariot & charioteer MATHRI . And It was VIBISHNA who requested sri rama to make of indira's help. Frm Valmiki
There is no bow called the Vaishnav dhanush. The bow Rama got from Parashuram after their encounter was Vishnu's, but Rama returned it to Varuna very early - didn't use it. The Kodanda is what he used throughout his war against Ravan and the rakshashas. That's the one Agastya gave him.
In Valmiki, Vibhishan played no role in the killing of Ravan, only in that of Indrajit. It was Matali who advised Rama to use the Brahmastra
hi every body yes this is the dead body of ravan coz there is no body can be 17foot tall i love ravan.ravan is the super hero who died in the battle with that guy called ram rum whatever.i like ravan i am the big fan of ravan i respect ravan too much that none of u guys can even imagine.ravan was undefeatable that assshole bhivishan was an gaddar who told the mystery of ravan ji death to that guy ram rum.other wise if that gaddar bhivashna never do an betray with ravan then ravan was immortal.
This is good for cartoon story lovers like you. If you read all the versions of Ramayana with an unbiased mind you will find the truth. Actually Ravana is the Good king. All the stories created in Ramayana are done by foolish brahmins who thought only of their own power and survival. Most of the unbiased scholars and scientists around the world have found the real story and the truth. Try to find them.
yupp! we all know tht ravan was a good king...he was the most intelligent person on the earth at tht time...he know all the vedas purans etc. he was a great devotee of Shiva....but he did only one mistake...
@anirudhkrishnamani siva is the destroyer n a part of life itself. hence he does not pray to anyone. rama is incarnation of vishnu and a demi god at that.so even if ram prayed to siva, siva doesnt pray to anyone.
ravan also was a siva devotee and spent years by siva's side practicing tapas. and also i never heard of ram being a siva devotee.
@heavyironmusic okay to make things clear... hanuman is an avatara of shiva and he prays to rama -
i hope u get the point. if u havent heard of rama being a shiva devotee then you must be a complete idiot not to know that.
and stop calling rama as a demi-god,he's an avatara not a "demi-god" so if he had willed he could've burnt ravana and his entire army into ashes in an instance but he didn't because he acted like a human!
@anirudhkrishnamani so ur saying that rama could have burnt ravana's army in moments but didnt cause he acted like a human. so he sent hanumans army to war, and let thousands of hanumans warriors die, just cause he fancied acting like a human. when he could have prevented all of it. yeah your argumant there has no grounds.
i have not found any evidence of ramam being a siva devotee.
and finally i dont see why any one should be offended when i called rama a demigod. its pretty much the same.
shiva did not incarnate as hanuman.u know both rama and ravana are disciples of Lord Shiva. Ravana is a very great devotee & bows only before Lord Shiva and has got many varams from Lord Shiva.Actually speaking Ravana is more powerful than Rama.rama begged before Shiva for getting victory in the war between ram and ravana.Since justice is with rama (whose wife ravana has taken) Lord Shiva blessed him to kill Ravana else he can never be won.
As miraclebelief1 said, Shiva did not incarnate as Hanuman. Hanuman was born out of one of his limbs, where he had part of his shakti enter the progeny of Vayu & Anjana. Had Shiva incarnated as Hanuman, he'd not be there, just as Vishnu wasn't there in Vaikuntha when Rama was on Bhulok.
Was Vibheeshan Ji an Incarnation of Dharma(Yama). I see that He was always Truthful, Benovalent and Impartial. Is there any source to support the same?
Its said that Mahatma Vidhur was an Incarnation(Atleast A Partial Incarnation) of Lord of Dharma, Yama. Just as Vidhur.
Also, just as Vidhur pleads with Dhrtrashtr, Vibheesan did with Ravan. While Vidhur wasnt kicked out of court(except once during Pandava's exile) Vibheesan was. Also Vidhur didnt move into Pandava's camp while Vibheesan did.
and if ur actually asking why he prayed then i have a very simple answer.. shiva loves vishnu as vishnu loves shiva.everyone prays to the person they love most its that they just don't realize it.
Can't be - Virbhadra long preceded Banasur, and may have been amar. When Shiva incinerated Kama-deva after Sati's death, but before his marriage to devi Parvati, Kama-deva got reborn to Krishna as Pradyumna, and it was during their time that Banasura lived. So chronologically, Banasura may have been Virbhadra reborn, but not vice versa.
Vishnu lost because he was supporting adharm by preventing Daksha from being punished, and being on the opposite side of Sati. No one can oppose Sati and win
Check the comment section of my video 'Bharat's confrontation with Kaikeyi - part 2' - there, I explain why Rama's avatar had to be kept secret until Ravan was killed.
Still today Kirat (indo-Mongoloid) people in Nepal follow their own traditions and culture. While many Nepalese became Hindus, Kiratas had their own religion called "Mundhum" based on nature, ancestors worship and also shamanistic.
Kirat people do not cremate the dead but bury and pork and alcohol are central parts to Kirati culture unlike Hindus.
For more, watch "Sakela~the greatest festival of kirat people"
and
"Connexion of Mongolia-Kirat:Revealing the Mystery of Origin of Phallus Stone"
Normally, maybe, but when Virbhadra was sent by Shiva to avenge Sati's humiliation for which she took agni-samadhi, Vishnu was among those who tried to protect Daksha, since he was one of the invited guests, and therefore, it was his duty to help protect the host. Virbhadra nonetheless trounced Vishnu and went on to behead Daksha
Its good to follow Ramcharitmanas, as in Valmiki Ramayan Shri Ram is shown only as a good and pious king and not as an incarnation of Bhagwan Shri Vishnu!
It's bunk to say that Valmiki didn't show Rama as an avatar of Vishnu. He did, but the major difference from RCM was that he didn't show Rama's avatar being common knowledge, since that would have alerted Ravan. I've explained this in another video of mine. In short, in Valmiki, Rama's divinity was a well kept secret, and disclosed only after he killed Ravan.
As for Tulsidas, he wrote his RCM in the 16th century, millennia after Valmiki. His credibility doesn't even come close: there were a lot of Ramayan authors in between, including Rishi Vyasa, who composed the Adhyatma Ramayan, from which RCM was largely derived.
Brahma granted Valmiki the var that as long as the rivers and mountains exist, so would the Ramayan. He never granted this to even Maharshi Vyasa, let alone Tulsidas.
So I reject anything that contradicts Valmiki, as RCM does often
This is supposed to be very similar to Adhyatma and Tulsidas' version. However, your (and others') opinions aside, the boon Brahma granted was to VALMIKI - that as long as the mountains and seas exist, so will the Ramayan. He didn't grant that to anyone else - not Hanuman, not Rishi Vyasa (let alone Tulsidas).
While in Valmiki itself, nothing is said about Shiva's reaction, it's almost absolutely certain that Shiva knew that Ravan (w/ Kumbhakarna) was the 2nd iteration of the curse on Vishnu's guards Jaya & Vijaya (See my earlier clip 'The curse on Jaya & Vijaya' in my channel.) So it would be natural for the gods to rejoice when their disciples were liberated from such curses.
I disagree w/ your last observation that this is concocted to show the supremacy of Vaishnava over Shaiva - for that to happen, they'd have to show some sort of a contest between Vishnu and Shiva.
In the Dwapar Yuga, Shiva fought Krishna at the behest of Banasura, and was defeated in this battle. In the Sati-Shiva story, Vishnu along w/ the devas protected Sati's father Daksha after Sati had cremated herself, but Virbhadra, who Shiva created to punish Daksha, defeated Vishnu in battle
This is the serial 'Ramayan' by Sagar Arts, the same outfit that produced the DD hit serial of the same name 23 years ago. The producer of this serial is Anand Sagar, since Ramanand Sagar died I think a couple of years back.
It started being telecast early last year on NDTV Imagine. At the time of this writing, they are currently showing Sita's vanvas. Note that the serial does not follow Valmiki, but rather an assortion of versions, such as Adhyatma, Ananda and Tulsidas Ramayan.
Comment removed
rosh2266 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
what the ffuck did i just watch
ElitePremium 1 month ago
lord ram won the battle against ravanan this shows that only the dharma will win always...there is no end for dharma...jai marutiram!!!
vinothiniramsingh 1 month ago
this people has done raawan is a beast.truth is not that.he is an innocent person. I will reject this
MrUdayakantha 1 month ago
@max8xxxzzz .Read below first. Ravana is the follower of siva.- yes it is. buy why he took sita. this concept is to explain no matter how great you are if you don't have discipline and morals in your life you will punished . so it is not the screen play to comments. you have to understand the concept and meaning behind the any activities. not only ramayanam, Our forefathers are great 100 times more knowledgeable than us. you die die also you can find fault .encourage others to read
apjgtr2001 2 months ago
@max8xxxzzz you have to read the complete Ramayanam to understand and to find out the answers for your questions. by watching few episodes of tv series you can not come to any conclusion. Rama pleased monkey - answer- " This concept is to explain to every human being have to love animals and every animal has their own skills and power. 2nd. Rama killed vaali- The answer -this concept to explain that there is no justice to any human who took other's wife. - understand?
apjgtr2001 2 months ago
@max8xxxzzz Don't post the same comment in multiple videos - make it to the point. As I mentioned in the Kumbhakarna falling asleep in battlefield thread, Sita never crossed any line, Vali had a boon to get half of his enemy's strength if he fought, and Ravan being a bhakt of Mahadev has nothing to do w/ whether Ramayan is fake.
Vrishasena 3 months ago
very intresting because i like films about hindu gods like hanuman krishana
and ramayan.
prarupr 4 months ago
Comment removed
prarupr 4 months ago
god is one
TurkishSolider344 4 months ago
I remember watching this when I was a little kid. This part a lot more. Still a trip man
harashiSAN 5 months ago
Hpy dusshera 2 al...!!
Mrnamangoel208 5 months ago
Can someone pleassssssssse tell me the name of the song playing in the background at 5 36, pleassssssse>
Fameeyes 6 months ago
Hello everybody good to see you back on net i want to futhure more discussions
sriram1282 7 months ago
How can one be a "partial incarnaton?" Either you are or you aren't, right? How can Hanuman be a partial incarnation of Shiva? I think there is something wrong here.
There used to be a race of monkey people complete with tails, etc. They are no longer with us. They must have been all killed off? Are there no skeletons in the area of monkey people in Shri Lanka to prove this? The land bridge is there and can be seen from satellite view....it is on Google maps. It is called Adams Bridge.
maricarbo 7 months ago
@maricarbo Partial incarnation means that when the avatar is there, the original god is still there in his abode: Shiva didn't disappear from Kailash when Hanuman was created, and Hanuman is immortal and doesn't affect Shiva's presense there. But when Rama & Krishna were on earth, Vishnu was not in Vaikuntha (unlike what some serials show) and so, in that way, they were complete avatars. In other words, in order to get Vishnu back, Rama had to be persuaded to end his avatar
Vrishasena 7 months ago
@Vrishasena
well, what I dont understand is how could Rava's Rath be in Skies after His sarathy was killed? could Ravan control His Chariot and get engaged in Battle at The same Time?
humbleRaj 6 months ago
@humbleRaj Yeah, this looks like a howler on part of the Sagars
Vrishasena 6 months ago
@Vrishasena
well, is Trijata Vibhishan's wife/Daughter?
Some sources mention her as Vibhishan's wife while some others as Vibhishan's daughters
humbleRaj 6 months ago
@humbleRaj Vibhishan's wife is Sarama. Trijata was described in some accounts as his daughter, but not all, she was a common Rakshashi. In Krittivas Ramayan, Vibhishan & Sarama had a son Taranisen, who was sent by Ravan to fight Rama, and died fighting him, even though he worshipped Rama, since he wanted to be freed of the cycles of re-birth, which happens if one gets killed by Narayan or Mahadev
Vrishasena 6 months ago
@Vrishasena
where can I get All These Books?
humbleRaj 6 months ago
@humbleRaj Some of the books are available online, like valmikiramayan . net (does not include the Uttarkand, last I looked) and mahabharataonline . com. Other places you might find them are sacredtexts . com
Vrishasena 1 month ago
@Vrishasena
Thank You Vrishasena!!!
humbleRaj 1 month ago
@humbleRaj
According to The Books I read, It is Maathili who advises SriRam to use Agneyastrato dry up Amrit in Nabi and then use Bramhastra to kill Ravan. But, this version shows its Vibhishan who informs Ravan about Ravan's Secret
humbleRaj 1 month ago
I don't know why the scriptures say that Shiva and Brama, Vishnu and Rama are different entities. I know them as being the same entity, just different incarnations.
For example, Krishna and Buddha are another two incarnations of the same list. You can find all of that in the listings of 1001 names of Krishna, or 1001 names of Rama, or just pick any one of them and do a search...I don't see Hanuman as an incarnaton of Rama because he was on the earth when Rama was...and you can't be split in 2
maricarbo 7 months ago
@maricarbo I think it's a tad presumptious to assume that what you know is more true than the scriptures - that's what you seem to be saying.
Buddha is listed as an avatar in some, but not all versions of Dasha avatar. He misses a lot of the characterestics of Vishnu, and also, it's not evident that he was listed as an avatar b4 his appearance, the way Kalki is.
Hanuman was a partial avatar of Shiva, not of Rama or Vishnu.
Vrishasena 7 months ago
Ravan dies by taking Lord Ram's name.........
prasshantaspp 7 months ago
You are all wrong! Shiva and Rama are just different incarnations of the same soul.
Rama or Shiva are not Hanuman. Hanuman is another soul. Hanuman is a devotee of Rama.
maricarbo 9 months ago
@maricarbo The scriptures do have Brahma, Vishnu & Shiva being different entities. Hanuman was derived from a bone from Shiva's limbs, but the important aspect about him - unlike Rama, who ceased to be in Vaikuntha when he was on earth, Hanuman existed and exists on earth the same time that Shiva does. In other words, Hanuman is immortal, but not a complete avatar in that Shiva still exists as a separate entity!!!
Vrishasena 8 months ago
You are all wrong! Shiva and Rama are just different incarnations of the same soul.
maricarbo 9 months ago
The Ravan from the 1980s Ramayan was way scarier and also that King Sugriv dude was scary as hell lol. IMO.
tb049 11 months ago
Anyone is free to write or make there own ideas about such puranas that does not mean they are correct. People with wisdom always stick or quote the righteous author. To write ramyana after reading original version is easy go for poets like kamban but to create one such own means real capability or blessing. Only 2 version of ramayan is right 1st is adi ramayan or valmiki ramayan next is tulasi ramayan. Plz note tulasi das has not written anything else expect just translated it into hindi.
samlivi 1 year ago
@samlivi Tulsidas didn't even USE Valmiki for his sourcing - he used Vyasa's Adhyatma Ramayan. His version is very different - like on who used the Shakti on Lakshman, how the payasa was divided b/w KKS, where did Parashurama encounter Rama, the Lakshman Rekha (not there in Valmiki), and so on.
I agree w/ you though - Valmiki is the original, and authentic author: others are just starters of derivative sects. Vashistha is said to have written a version, and if true, that would be on par.
Vrishasena 7 months ago
@Vrishasena
It is also said that Bajrang Bali, Mahvir Hanuman Ji has Authoured A Ramayan around the same time as Maharshi Valmiki. However, it seems Valmiki felt sad that Hanuman's version was better than His own and to make sure that Valmiki remains Adi Kavi, Hanuman tore His Version. For this Valmiki felt ashamed and in His Next Avatar as "Tulsi Das" Composed Hanuman Chalisa
humbleRaj 6 months ago
@humbleRaj I've heard of this one, but it's more an act of belief, since there are huge differences b/w Valmiki & Tulsidas. In fact, Tulsidas follows the Adhyatma Ramayan, written by Vyasa or one of his disciples/sons. I think the Hanuman influencing Tulsidas is just an attempt by some to lend legitimacy to someone whose version was written in Kalyug, or else, nobody would have believed it over the writings of Valmiki, who alone was given the boon by Brahma on the immortality of the Ramayan
Vrishasena 6 months ago
I don't think even kamban has written such controversial matters. Then Banasur was a adharmi who was doing all nonsense because of lord shiva boon. So lord Shiva deliberately let lost the battle with sri krishna and appeared as if he was in sleep because of mohna astra send my krishna. Plz note all destructive astras originate frm Lord shiva he is sole master of destruction Plz read .Sri Bagavatham written by Sage Suha son Of Sage Vayasa author of mahabaratham.
samlivi 1 year ago
uploader should read valmiki ramayan 1st and also know what does kothandam means in tamil 1st.. Rama was given the bow called VISHNAV DANUSH by sage agasthya at time of vanvas and before battel between rama & ravana sage agasthya gave him the upadesha of SRI ADITYA HRIDAYAM which protected rama as a spiritual armor during the batter. With request from lord bhrama , Indra send his chariot & charioteer MATHRI . And It was VIBISHNA who requested sri rama to make of indira's help. Frm Valmiki
samlivi 1 year ago
@samlivi & anirudhakrishnamani
There is no bow called the Vaishnav dhanush. The bow Rama got from Parashuram after their encounter was Vishnu's, but Rama returned it to Varuna very early - didn't use it. The Kodanda is what he used throughout his war against Ravan and the rakshashas. That's the one Agastya gave him.
In Valmiki, Vibhishan played no role in the killing of Ravan, only in that of Indrajit. It was Matali who advised Rama to use the Brahmastra
Vrishasena 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
hi every body yes this is the dead body of ravan coz there is no body can be 17foot tall i love ravan.ravan is the super hero who died in the battle with that guy called ram rum whatever.i like ravan i am the big fan of ravan i respect ravan too much that none of u guys can even imagine.ravan was undefeatable that assshole bhivishan was an gaddar who told the mystery of ravan ji death to that guy ram rum.other wise if that gaddar bhivashna never do an betray with ravan then ravan was immortal.
jatts11 1 year ago
sagars' creativity didnt grow even in decades... still de same arrow-to-arrow combat... same style of arrows splitting into many...
sudhanshu266 1 year ago
this film is not truth
shottte 1 year ago
anirudhakrishnamani
u have a phenolumusdeep and great knowledge about ramayana
and according to u there is hanumadh ramayana u r correct
but u r wrong dat no one is having the material of this ramayana
my great grand father had it with him but unfortunately heis noo more in this world and hanumad ramayana was burnt in an fire tragrdy
but there are still some of the pages of it writtn by my great grand father in samporna parthia sanskrit
which is not understood by any one in this country
MsRockey123 1 year ago
this drama had poor acting, the guy that plays raavan is more of a comical character
indrajeet 1 year ago
i'm really disappointed as i have never seen a proper hanuman in any of these.
he was supposed to be of grey langur category.
so his face was black with a body covered with white fur
anirudhkrishnamani 2 years ago
big mistake!
lord rama wore an armor given to him by lord indra when he fought ravana.
the chariot also belonged to indra so did the bow.
i.e. he didn't use the kothandam when he fought ravana.
rama also had matted hair like the hair of sadhus you see in rishikesh..
as always i've never seen a proper depiction of ramayana..
they could have use the actual text as the script.. it would have been much better.
anirudhkrishnamani 2 years ago 8
@anirudhkrishnamani
Are you going by Kamban, or some other version?
Vrishasena 1 year ago
@Vrishasena
nope i'm going buy the original valmiki ramayana.
and one more thing.. rama was dark in complexion and not some guy who used fair n lovely.
anirudhkrishnamani 11 months ago
This is good for cartoon story lovers like you. If you read all the versions of Ramayana with an unbiased mind you will find the truth. Actually Ravana is the Good king. All the stories created in Ramayana are done by foolish brahmins who thought only of their own power and survival. Most of the unbiased scholars and scientists around the world have found the real story and the truth. Try to find them.
matalekalum 1 year ago
@matalekalum u r really foolish...y does a good king need to abduct wife of other and moreover Rama was kshatriya...
anubala82 1 year ago
@matalekalum
yupp! we all know tht ravan was a good king...he was the most intelligent person on the earth at tht time...he know all the vedas purans etc. he was a great devotee of Shiva....but he did only one mistake...
abhii2787 1 year ago
@matalekalum
only an Imbicile Dharma Haters like you would appreciate Ravan
Ravan was No Dravidian.
you must be some dmk member
humbleRaj 6 months ago
@anirudhkrishnamani it seems that u r wrong in that aspect son the only armor raam had was latchman
sembonzakrakagayoshi 11 months ago
@sembonzakrakagayoshi
nope he got his armor from indra in the end.
also indra gave rama his chariot and some of his weapons as well.
read the ramayana!
anirudhkrishnamani 11 months ago
miraclebelief
lol you don,t know much about vishnu you think he is a human and non god
and you say that shiva is not incarnation off hanuman no one could believe you
in shiva puran states shiva incarnated hanuman and ramayan also and you don,t know there are milliopns off vishnu
please go read shiva puran and ramayan
gewooneerlijk 2 years ago
i need english subs
shivpatel 2 years ago
siva prays to rama as rama prays to shiva.
because they both love each other like brothers because they are.
anirudhkrishnamani 2 years ago 9
@anirudhkrishnamani siva is the destroyer n a part of life itself. hence he does not pray to anyone. rama is incarnation of vishnu and a demi god at that.so even if ram prayed to siva, siva doesnt pray to anyone.
ravan also was a siva devotee and spent years by siva's side practicing tapas. and also i never heard of ram being a siva devotee.
heavyironmusic 11 months ago
@heavyironmusic okay to make things clear... hanuman is an avatara of shiva and he prays to rama -
i hope u get the point. if u havent heard of rama being a shiva devotee then you must be a complete idiot not to know that.
and stop calling rama as a demi-god,he's an avatara not a "demi-god" so if he had willed he could've burnt ravana and his entire army into ashes in an instance but he didn't because he acted like a human!
anirudhkrishnamani 11 months ago
@anirudhkrishnamani so ur saying that rama could have burnt ravana's army in moments but didnt cause he acted like a human. so he sent hanumans army to war, and let thousands of hanumans warriors die, just cause he fancied acting like a human. when he could have prevented all of it. yeah your argumant there has no grounds.
i have not found any evidence of ramam being a siva devotee.
and finally i dont see why any one should be offended when i called rama a demigod. its pretty much the same.
heavyironmusic 10 months ago
@heavyironmusic
not interested in arguing with an idiot.
anirudhkrishnamani 10 months ago
why was shiva incarnated as hanuman
and prayed rama.?
jai sri ram
gewooneerlijk 2 years ago
shiva did not incarnate as hanuman.u know both rama and ravana are disciples of Lord Shiva. Ravana is a very great devotee & bows only before Lord Shiva and has got many varams from Lord Shiva.Actually speaking Ravana is more powerful than Rama.rama begged before Shiva for getting victory in the war between ram and ravana.Since justice is with rama (whose wife ravana has taken) Lord Shiva blessed him to kill Ravana else he can never be won.
miraclebelief 2 years ago
@gewooneerlijk
As miraclebelief1 said, Shiva did not incarnate as Hanuman. Hanuman was born out of one of his limbs, where he had part of his shakti enter the progeny of Vayu & Anjana. Had Shiva incarnated as Hanuman, he'd not be there, just as Vishnu wasn't there in Vaikuntha when Rama was on Bhulok.
Vrishasena 11 months ago
@Vrishasena
Was Vibheeshan Ji an Incarnation of Dharma(Yama). I see that He was always Truthful, Benovalent and Impartial. Is there any source to support the same?
Its said that Mahatma Vidhur was an Incarnation(Atleast A Partial Incarnation) of Lord of Dharma, Yama. Just as Vidhur.
humbleRaj 6 months ago
@Vrishasena
Also, just as Vidhur pleads with Dhrtrashtr, Vibheesan did with Ravan. While Vidhur wasnt kicked out of court(except once during Pandava's exile) Vibheesan was. Also Vidhur didnt move into Pandava's camp while Vibheesan did.
humbleRaj 6 months ago
@gewooneerlijk
i agree
and if ur actually asking why he prayed then i have a very simple answer.. shiva loves vishnu as vishnu loves shiva.everyone prays to the person they love most its that they just don't realize it.
anirudhkrishnamani 11 months ago
vishnu doesn,t fight virabhadra if vishnu use his sudarshan chakra he could cut virabhadra head off like banasur
virabhadra was the incarnation off banasur.
gewooneerlijk 2 years ago
Can't be - Virbhadra long preceded Banasur, and may have been amar. When Shiva incinerated Kama-deva after Sati's death, but before his marriage to devi Parvati, Kama-deva got reborn to Krishna as Pradyumna, and it was during their time that Banasura lived. So chronologically, Banasura may have been Virbhadra reborn, but not vice versa.
Vishnu lost because he was supporting adharm by preventing Daksha from being punished, and being on the opposite side of Sati. No one can oppose Sati and win
Vrishasena 2 years ago
@Vrishasena hahaha you got all your FACTS wrong SUNNY!!
karan30612 1 year ago
@karan30612
Which ones?
Vrishasena 11 months ago
What's that song playing in background anybody know?
Angad1826 2 years ago
Parth2488
Check the comment section of my video 'Bharat's confrontation with Kaikeyi - part 2' - there, I explain why Rama's avatar had to be kept secret until Ravan was killed.
Vrishasena 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Still today Kirat (indo-Mongoloid) people in Nepal follow their own traditions and culture. While many Nepalese became Hindus, Kiratas had their own religion called "Mundhum" based on nature, ancestors worship and also shamanistic.
Kirat people do not cremate the dead but bury and pork and alcohol are central parts to Kirati culture unlike Hindus.
For more, watch "Sakela~the greatest festival of kirat people"
and
"Connexion of Mongolia-Kirat:Revealing the Mystery of Origin of Phallus Stone"
diliprai 2 years ago
Bhagvan Vishnu Is Invincible and omnipotent. Virbhadra or even his creator can't win over him. Om Namo Narayan!
parth2488 2 years ago 3
Normally, maybe, but when Virbhadra was sent by Shiva to avenge Sati's humiliation for which she took agni-samadhi, Vishnu was among those who tried to protect Daksha, since he was one of the invited guests, and therefore, it was his duty to help protect the host. Virbhadra nonetheless trounced Vishnu and went on to behead Daksha
Vrishasena 2 years ago
My point - one can't categorically say that Vishnu is superior to Shiva, or vice versa. Each surpassed the other, depending on the situation.
Vrishasena 2 years ago
Its good to follow Ramcharitmanas, as in Valmiki Ramayan Shri Ram is shown only as a good and pious king and not as an incarnation of Bhagwan Shri Vishnu!
parth2488 2 years ago
It's bunk to say that Valmiki didn't show Rama as an avatar of Vishnu. He did, but the major difference from RCM was that he didn't show Rama's avatar being common knowledge, since that would have alerted Ravan. I've explained this in another video of mine. In short, in Valmiki, Rama's divinity was a well kept secret, and disclosed only after he killed Ravan.
Vrishasena 2 years ago
As for Tulsidas, he wrote his RCM in the 16th century, millennia after Valmiki. His credibility doesn't even come close: there were a lot of Ramayan authors in between, including Rishi Vyasa, who composed the Adhyatma Ramayan, from which RCM was largely derived.
Brahma granted Valmiki the var that as long as the rivers and mountains exist, so would the Ramayan. He never granted this to even Maharshi Vyasa, let alone Tulsidas.
So I reject anything that contradicts Valmiki, as RCM does often
Vrishasena 2 years ago
according to me the most accurate will be hanumadh ramayana.
which was written by hanuman him-self.
unfortunately no one has any material of this ramayana.
anirudhkrishnamani 2 years ago
This is supposed to be very similar to Adhyatma and Tulsidas' version. However, your (and others') opinions aside, the boon Brahma granted was to VALMIKI - that as long as the mountains and seas exist, so will the Ramayan. He didn't grant that to anyone else - not Hanuman, not Rishi Vyasa (let alone Tulsidas).
Vrishasena 2 years ago
Rama is an avatar of Vishnu. Ravana was a great devotee of Shiva.
I do not understand how they ca show that Shiva is happy after Ravana is killed.
After all, all demons who were killed by Vishnu's avatars were great devotees of Shiva (and have received special boon from Brahma).
I am myself a great devotee of Vishnu but I think that this element of Ramayana has been concocted to show the supremacy of Vaisnism over Shaivinism
ecrdab747 2 years ago
While in Valmiki itself, nothing is said about Shiva's reaction, it's almost absolutely certain that Shiva knew that Ravan (w/ Kumbhakarna) was the 2nd iteration of the curse on Vishnu's guards Jaya & Vijaya (See my earlier clip 'The curse on Jaya & Vijaya' in my channel.) So it would be natural for the gods to rejoice when their disciples were liberated from such curses.
Vrishasena 2 years ago
HELLO
but god brahma was borned out vishnu navel what would happens if brahma and vishnu goes to one.?
gewooneerlijk 2 years ago
I disagree w/ your last observation that this is concocted to show the supremacy of Vaishnava over Shaiva - for that to happen, they'd have to show some sort of a contest between Vishnu and Shiva.
In the Dwapar Yuga, Shiva fought Krishna at the behest of Banasura, and was defeated in this battle. In the Sati-Shiva story, Vishnu along w/ the devas protected Sati's father Daksha after Sati had cremated herself, but Virbhadra, who Shiva created to punish Daksha, defeated Vishnu in battle
Vrishasena 2 years ago
Thank you for posting!
What is the title of this series?
Thank you.
Om Namah Shivaya
muktikirtan 2 years ago
This is the serial 'Ramayan' by Sagar Arts, the same outfit that produced the DD hit serial of the same name 23 years ago. The producer of this serial is Anand Sagar, since Ramanand Sagar died I think a couple of years back.
It started being telecast early last year on NDTV Imagine. At the time of this writing, they are currently showing Sita's vanvas. Note that the serial does not follow Valmiki, but rather an assortion of versions, such as Adhyatma, Ananda and Tulsidas Ramayan.
Vrishasena 2 years ago
wonderful! thank you for this information!
blessings
muktikirtan 2 years ago
jai shri ram
fijitec 3 years ago
sucks
jambolambosya 3 years ago
What does - Rama killing Ravan, or this video, or me posting it?
Vrishasena 3 years ago