From the Party of DEREGULATION of business that has led to the demise of the Lower and then the Middle Classes, RON PAUL AND HIS ASSHOLE SUPPORTERS WANT MORE DEREGULATION.
Claiming he's a defender of freedom, his TRUE AIM IS A TOTAL OLIGARCHY.
NO SOCIAL PROGRAMS, NO RETURN OF BUSINESS TO THE US, NO
TAXES IN BUSINESS. ANARCHISTIC CAPITALISM AT ITS WORST.
He;s Reagen reincarnated and his supporters are American
Go to ronpaul2012 . com and purchase a $12 insulated mug, $6 yard sign, maybe a $30 hoodie to keep you warm when out in the cooling autumn air. Or, just donate a cash amount of your choice to the cause of liberty.
Fucking Youtube altered the "news & politics" section!
You the people can no longer access the "most viewed" rankings which is part of how videos become viral by people checking out the rankings!
Instead Youtube now dictates the "top news" and what is "popular around the web" and even only displays a dozen or so of those where before you could browse thru ten pages of rankings!
This is like a mayor brain seizure in our collective brain.
DEAR RON PAUL SUPPORTERS -- please type "Fox news Happening Now" into google, bring up the site and vote for Ron Paul -- Cain is winning the poll at the moment, Ron Paul is in second. With your help, we can push Ron Paul's name to the top of the list. Thank you.
I switched my designation by internet/mail last week from Independent to Republican in California. (I had to hold my nose). It takes less than 10 minutes. Just google register to vote and you're in. Just do it right now, folks. GO!
@TheOneartist You've heard "if you can't beat 'em, join 'em"?
It goes differently if you can't stomach joining them - then you smear them.
Those of an authoritarian slant hate Paul's argument for liberty and smear him.
Those of an anarchic* slant hate Paul's belief that we need government for some things - and so they smear him even though what he wants is FAR closer to what they want than anyone else is proposing.
* "anarchy" to be read as the dictionary definition, not the emotive one.
@thirteenfingers I don't even know why the anarchists are getting involved. The only way we can live without government is when we die, in Heaven. They're on the wrong videos.
@RyanR3volution - well look at his plan you dumbfuck, he wants to eliminate most of the Gov departments. Also he is NOT for pardoning drug offenders, he wants to leave it to the States. Also he is not against war, he just doesn't want to pay for it, he would hire mercinaries to take care of all problems, and his plan would leave 250,000 unemployed, and would do nothing to help the debt.
@clownporn1 The video you linked to is him arguing for the exact opposite of "tyranny of the State".
What on earth do you get from that that you're now using against him?
His position is in the federal government. His efforts have always been to pull the federal government back to its constitutional limits and defer to the states anything not explicitly granted to it.
Once that is done the next step is to prevent the states overstepping their remit.
@clownporn1 Again you've linked a video, and again it doesn't say what you seem to be claiming it does.
He says government is a reflection of the people which is why the onus to make things better is upon the people. He wants the government back in its place.
How about we act like adults for a moment... let's cut off the conversation we've been having so far, and instead - can you outline exactly, and maturely, what you think Ron Paul is proposing and what you think should happen instead?
well Dr.Dumbfuck, he is only pro-government when the GOP is charge, isn't that something..
Ron Paul is all things to all people. To millions of Burmese cyclone victims, he is also a heartless bastard. Last Thursday, when a congressional resolution merely offering "condolences and sympathy" to the victims came up for a vote, Ronny was the only member of the entire US Congress to vote "NO"
@clownporn1 Why is the government spending money to offer "condolences and sympathy"?
It costs money to form, table, debate and draft everything that goes through government... then costs more to process everything that comes after a YES vote.
What use are hollow "condolences and sympathy" to victims of a cyclone? Consider that they have lost homes and livelihoods and will likely NEVER receive the "condolences and sympathy" and it becomes clear that it's a hollow, self-serving gesture.
@thirteenfingers - resolution: In policy debate, a resolution or topic is a normative statement which the affirmative team affirms and the negative team negates. Resolutions are selected annually by affiliated schools...
the big crayon version: should congress give "condolences and sympathy" to Burma which was destroyed, Ron Paul said NO.. he was the only one, HE WAS THE ONLY ONE!
@clownporn1 And yet that still cost the taxpayer money. EVERYTHING that government does - from fighting wars to having a brainless vote on hollow gestures of sympathy which will do NOTHING to help ANYBODY and will NOT make them feel any better.
@thirteenfingers - 'It was self-serving, hollow, feel-good nonsense.' - Charity and selflessness are universally hailed as virtues. Therefore, Altruism is for sheeple!
@clownporn1 Charity and selflessness are virtues. That which I called self-serving, hollow, feel-good nonsense was not charity and was not selflessness.
If the members of congress were motivated by charity and selflessness they wouldn't have had a vote - the would have individually put their hands in their pockets, taken out some of their money and given it to the charities working to help the cyclone victims.
@thirteenfingers - 'the would have individually put their hands in their pockets, taken out some of their money and given it to the charities working to help the cyclone victims.' - a free market solution lmao XD, what bullshit. plus why should you giva a shit in the first place, you don't even live here?
States rights were never used to impose slavery, that is just a monstrosity of a lie and ahistorical.
You know who also opposed States rights? Hitler did, but yeah... you are right, only bigoted support states rights, you and Hitler could not be that :D
@RyanR3volution - 'States rights were never used to impose slavery, that is just a monstrosity of a lie and ahistorical' - States' rights in U.S. politics refers to political powers reserved for the U.S. state governments rather than the federal government. It is often considered a loaded term because of its use in opposition to federally mandated racial desegregation, hence racism. Jefferson Davis stated States Rights as his excuse to hold slaves.
No states rights were NEVER used to defend slavery, in fact it was the opposite, one of the reasons why the South Ceded was because the Northern states were using states rights to nullify the fugitive slave laws, the South wanted the federal government to force those states to abide with the federal fugitive slave laws.
@RyanR3volution - Resolved, That the union of these States rests on the equality of rights and privileges among its members, and that it is especially the duty of the Senate, which represents the States in their sovereign capacity, to resist all attempts to discriminate either in relation to person or property, so as, in the Territories—which are the common possession of the United States—to give advantages to the citizens of one State which are not equally secured to those of every other State.
The greatest threats to personal liberty come in the form of centralization, the most accountable governments are those of localities, you cannot say that centralized states protect rights.
Hitler say states rights as a enemy of his tyranny.
Advantages?
Everyone has the same rights, local governments can govern as they see fit as long as they do not infringe on the rights of others, your entire arguement is a ahistorical strawman
@RyanR3volution - The Preamble to the Confederate States Constitution begins: "We, the people of the Confederate States, each State acting in its sovereign and independent character..."
how is the tyranny of the local any different from tyranny of state?
in most cases local governments may be more corrupt and unaccountable than the federal government.
'your entire arguement is a ahistorical strawman ' - google - projection.
@clownporn1 Who would pay the "hired" mercenaries? Your comment makes no sense.
I'm not even FROM the USA and I know that Paul has repeatedly said we (and I say "we" as our army fights alongside yours) shouldn't be empire building, we shouldn't have invaded Iraq or Afghanistan and that we should "just come home".
@thirteenfingers - well the taxpayers you dumbfuck, most of the people in the army are poor. does Ron Paul have a JOB for them, maybe they should get rich. lmao XD
@thirteenfingers - 'Paul would not just disband the military, he would bring them home. To reduce their numbers would be a gradual process.' - well you got my point about his plan
a FREE MARKET SOLUTION, and he did vote for the war in Afganistan.
@clownporn1 It is not unemployment when you train up the troops for civilian jobs, meanwhile reducing taxes and restrictions so allowing businesses to create many, many more jobs than they currently can and then cutting back military numbers.
It's not unemployment when you retrain them and they get right into new jobs they are properly skilled for right away.
Paul voted to go after the perpetrators of 9/11, NOT to fight ongoing wars in Afghanistan or Iraq nor to engage in nation building.
@thirteenfingers - 'It's not unemployment when you retrain them and they get right into new jobs they are properly skilled for right away.' - that are 1$/hour, would you work 1$/hour. Because people cannot survive on slave wages, plus Ronny is for free trade so some mexican will get that job first. I repeat 'close to a million will be unemployed'.
how do YOU feel about the minimum wage? <------------- english, do you speak it!
The ONLY two reasons American companies have for employing Mexican labour are 1> The individual is better for the job than the American he competes against. OR 2> Government makes domestic labour too expensive so they employ illegal labour.
Paul's proposals would remove the motivation to employ foreign labour outright.
I speak English well enough to know the difference between ! and ? ;)
@clownporn1 Don't make the mistake of thinking that because you dislike what I'm saying that I know nothing about those things.
I run my own business on a shoestring budget. I know more about those things than most.
I know that I can't afford minimum wage for someone to come in and clean or sort out some clerical work I don't want to do. I can't provide the job as I would be BREAKING THE LAW. Instead, there's no job at all. I stay late and do it myself.
@thirteenfingers - 'Minimum wage means fewer jobs' - if you're a greedy cunt.
'I run my own business on a shoestring budget. I know more about those things than most' - well then you're a knowlegable cunt, who owns a dildo shop
'I know that I can't afford minimum wage for someone to come in and clean or sort out some clerical work I don't want to do.' - you're a lazy cunt, because your lazy ass should give a fuck about YOUR buisness. and you're a lying cunt, tax breaks for small Busness
@clownporn1 If I had to choose between no job at £6 an hour and a job at £1 an hour... yes, I'd take it.
I'd do what I've always done... work hard at any job I can get while building skills to get more.
If my business folded tomorrow (and being related to the construction industry it's an ever-present danger right now) I would work for £1/hour if that's the best I could get.
Question is, why does anyone pay MORE than minimum wage? The answer to that is why your $1/hour point is moot.
@thirteenfingers - moot, no it's legit because Ron Paul wants everyone to work 1$/hour, that would lower demand and that would cause massive inflation.
'If my business folded tomorrow (and being related to the construction industry it's an ever-present danger right now) I would work for £1/hour if that's the best I could get' - bullshit, you would be on Government bitching about socalism, lmao XD
@clownporn1 I've been unemployed. I had saved to get me by.
Usually I got a job here, at other times I left the country to get work. I take responsibility for myself and do not need the government to pick up the pieces when I end up out of work. Don't judge everyone by your standards.
Paul doesn't want everyone on $1/hour. He wants individuals to make private agreements with employers to work for a mutually satisfactory wage. I've already addressed the effect of minimum wage on PRICES.
@thirteenfingers ' He wants individuals to make private agreements with employers to work for a mutually satisfactory wage' - yeah we had that already, they were called sweatshops. and corporations with an absolute top-down hierarchy that make their peons piss into a jar. yeah 'Unions' are a thing Ron Paul is against, so knock that shit off ya dumb cunt.
@clownporn1 In the 4 years I was a hard-working unskilled worker I got ONE raise or 20p/hour. Minimum wage is an anchor to unskilled wages, it increases the cost of goods and services and makes them LESS affordable for those who live on minimum wage. it skews the job market, it skews trade and causes more harm than it solves.
@thirteenfingers - 'Minimum wage is an anchor to unskilled wages, it increases the cost of goods and services and makes them LESS affordable for those who live on minimum wage.' - do you know about supply/demand?
more money into the economy increses demand, so more jobs. ok! you get get that you cunt
@clownporn1 Does he have jobs for them? Not government/taxpayer-funded ones, no.
He proposes to make America an irresistable prospect for businesses, to reduce business costs and allow private industry to provide more jobs.
It would work, it would create enough jobs to end the unemployment problem virtually overnight and (I know this from friend I have the US army) thanks to how good the military is at equipping their staff with useful skills they would be well placed to take up civilian jobs.
@thirteenfingers - 'He proposes to make America an irresistable prospect for businesses, to reduce business costs and allow private industry to provide more jobs' - how do you feel about the minimum wage?
and private industry has done a great job as far as freedoms go, right?
well his plan would cut the military in half, millions would be out of work.
Ron Paul Money Bomb Oct 19th!!!!!!!! Go to Ronpaul2012[dot]com. Ron Paul Money Bomb Oct 19th!!!!!!!!Ron Paul Money Bomb Oct 19th!!!!!!!! Go to Ronpaul2012[dot]com.Ron Paul Money Bomb Oct 19th!!!!!!!!Go to Ronpaul2012[dot]com.Ron Paul Money Bomb Oct 19th!!!!!!!!Ron Paul Money Bomb Oct 19th!!!!!!!!Ron Paul Money Bomb Oct 19th!!!!!!!!
@TMOvids This is a fan-based ad by Revolution PAC. But check out the new official Ron Paul ad called "Consistent". It attacks Cain, Romney and Perry with their own quotes!
I love the frat boy Paul cultists who never question where his money comes from for all these ads. You tools are as bad as the Obama drones. Change We Can Believe In! Obama had more individual support than any candidate ever, he must be a good, independant guy then. He also had more financial money than any candidate in history. Ron Paul gets most of his money from wealthy private donors, fundamentalist christian groups, and corporations. Shhhh! Don't tell the frat boys, they have their messiah.
@youngbuck189 LOLWUT? Ron Paul gets most of his money from military donors and very devoted supporters. Sounds like you're describing Romney.
Besides, this ad isn't even an official one. It's run by a fan organization that went through all the trouble to air this nationally. And I applaud them.
Obama's "Change We Can Believe In" was an empty campaign slogan. Ron Paul actually has consistency and a detailed plan to back him up. Plus, he doesn't flip-flop or lie like Obama.
@StrandEvent Obama claimed the same thing, he had more average people donations than any candidate in American history, the most populary supported candidate in America history. It doesn't mean shit when he also gets much more money from financial institutions. You need to drop the Ron Paul cultism and realize he is just another career politician who is pandering to anti-imperialist Americans. Words mean nothing, Ron Paul's record DOES NOT prove him to be the man he claims to be.
@StrandEvent yea i did drop acid, but i knew the same things before as i do now. why don't you stop being a cowardly white supremest and just grow a set and let em drop
@youngbuck189 I'll drop my "Ron Paul cultism" when you drop your self worship and grow passed your "I drop acid therefore I know all" psycho babble. - peace
This last debate sucked. I was so sick of hearing the two meatheads bicker back and forth about each other's past and eating up all the time. I tried to think if Ronald Reagan would have involved himself in a pissing match like that and NO I don't think he would. Nor would he sling mud like these new guys. He was diplomatic like Ron Paul is and it's sad that the mainstream is just putting salt on the festering soar that the debates have become. Vote Ron Paul if you want a diplomat.
I'll guarantee this....if Ron Paul wins the 2012 election then I would say you all have been swallowed by the biggest trap ever. Ron Paul getting elected in 2012 is virtually impossible UNLESS the campaign finance laws are changed.
Why?
Because Ron Paul doesn't have the backing of industry. And big business runs the world regardless of how you feel about it or how you vote.
@tinylittlegnat2 sorry, but a great number of scientist have signed a letter explaining that evolution doesn't truly exist… that is in Darwin's definition.
@DaBroskiBro Really because over 99% of biologists say it is true. So does over 100 years of research. What scientists signed this document? Do you have a link or are you talking out of your ass?
You taxes payed for those, correct. Do you vote for the guy you want to marry or what´s up with these personal beliefs? Ron can believe in Santa Claus for all I care, who gives a shit.
@TheOneartist Damn straight I wouldnt vote for a man who would deny reality. over 99% of biologists not only say evolution is true but it is used in medical research and in medicine used for decades. What kind of doctor doesnt believe in the science behind the medicine?
@tinylittlegnat2 Oh wow, seriously? I thought you were joking! So you'd seriously choose Cain or Romney or Perry over Ron Paul just because of this!?
The theory of evolution is still a theory. Otherwise, it wouldn't be called a theory. Yes, it is backed up by a lot of fact, but it's considered a theory. Besides, Ron Paul never even denied the theory of evolution. That's misreporting. In fact, in the video where he addressed this, he seemed to stand in the middle.
@TheOneartist First off none of those dishonest retards you named believe in evolution.
Seond you have no understanding of what the word theory means. Gravity is a theory. The earth going around the sun is a theory. A theory is the highest achievement a hypothesis can achieve in the scinetific world.
Ron paul said in previosu debates he denies evolution.
@tinylittlegnat2 So what? What does believing in evolution really have to do with being president? It is not like he is going to force creationism and many of his other beliefs down peoples' throats. I know evolution is a fact but am I going to let some red herring issue like that overshadow the real issues such as the economy, our domestic and foreign policies? No. But if someone wants an athiestic messiah so badly then go ahead and write in Christopher Hitchens.
@jsu401 Because I want my president to have the correct answers to the questions. And if he isnt smart enough to choose science over the box that says "god did it" then he isnt good enough to answer the hard questions like should we or should we not nuke an invading country that also has nuclear arms.
Also Christopher Hitchens is not elligible for president. Try again.
@tinylittlegnat2 Good luck finding a president that fits into that small box of criticism, simply put you will not find a person who agrees with every thing you to believe in unless of course you decide to run for president in which case you could vote for yourself. He has answered many of the relevent tough questions intelligently atleast, that have made other candidates squirm and squeal. I dont care if you believe in the FSM just so long as you will do your job & have a record to back it up.
@jsu401 I dont need a president to agree with everything I agree with but I do need him to have a basic fundemental understanding of science if he is going to be making choices on my childrens educational sysytem.
@tinylittlegnat2 Except he is going to give choice of education and its standards back to the states so again his personal views are irrelevent. Try again. Though please tell who would you rather vote for, if anyone.
@jsu401 No he wouldnt. Because that is not what the people want. America is a center left country. They like their public education and without federal funding most states couldnt afford to educate anyone past the fifth grade.
As president his personal views still matter because people look to a president for views and guidance. They do that with all peoples of authority. If he doesnt believe in reality then it hurts the education sysytem and the country. Look at the last idiot from texas.
@tinylittlegnat2 Yes he would. This country is more center right than left. What good has our federally run education system done for us? It hasn't raised grades more the opposite. And throwing more money at the problem isn't going to fix it, case and point with the bank and GM bailouts.
"As president his personal views still ..." And that is the crux of the matter. People trust the Government way too much and allow things like the Patriot Act to pass whether it be under Bush or Obama.
@jsu401 Study after study and poll after poll says this country is more left than right. People like the things govt has given them. And our education system is good its the work ethic given to our children that is bad. If a child in the 50s got bad grades it is his fault now its the teachers fault. Thats a big part of the problem.
The govt is a tool to be weilded by the people. You dont blame the hammer for bending the nail you blame the shitting carpenter holding the hammer.
@tinylittlegnat2 I like to see these polls and studies you speak of. Ever hear of the ignorant majority? People like gov't taking care of them from cradle to grave, but one of the many problems with this is that it costs mucho dinero and it adds on to the national debt making it unsustainable, around 60 trillion worth of unfunded liabilities from Medicare and SS. I don't like the idea that the money I put into these programs knowing that they will not be here when I retire.
@jsu401 The congressional budget office has stated repeatedly that ss has enough money to pay out for the next 20 to 30 years and after that pay out 80% full size payments in perpetuity. And that is if nothing is done to improve it. Your money will be there.
Social Security has no actual money, the federal government used that money as soon as they got it, they used the social security funds to purchase treasury bonds.
We currently borrow the money to send out the social security checks, that is why people say it doesn't have any funds left.
As they push inflation on the US dollar it will devalue and reduce the US debt, with the side effect of also ruining US treasury bonds (of which the SS trust fund is currently invested.
@tinylittlegnat2 "And our education system is good its the work ethic given to our children that is bad. " Disagree with the first part, agree with the last. Though in defense of students they have grown in an society of "Me" and instant gratification so one shouldn't be too suprised that many students do poorly, there are other factors too but these are a few of the biggest. If states could compete with one another and/or globally on education then best wins and others will follow that state.
@jsu401 Competition between states does happen. Thats how we have some states being better at education than others. BTW notice high on the list are the liberal "Socialist" states.
And global competition is a race to the bottom. Notice how since clinton opened up NAFTA wages and benefits have dropped like a rock for Americans because the chinese will do back breaking labor for a dollar a day. It destroys the middle class.
@tinylittlegnat2 Gov't is indeed a tool, like a shield, but it was intended to be used to protect our rights spelled out in our constitution with the bill of rights and to leave the things unmentioned to the states. Though this is where you vehemently disagree that gov't was intended to be big correct? When the carpenter (Federal Gov't) starts to be doing something outside of its contract (Constitution) then it is in error.
@jsu401 You are right that I disagree. The govt is what people want it to be. If it stayed small like you wanted it to we would have no dams, no interstate, no hospital systems, no electrical grid, etc etc. Things that make this country awesome. Things that make other people look at us and demand their country have.
Look at countries with small to no govt. Somalia comes to mind. Looks fantastic doesnt it.
@tinylittlegnat2 Also I do not look to gov't for my morals. Assuming you are an athiest I like to think you are on the same page that you don't need/want Big gov't for that matter to tell you what to believe in and what morals to follow. Obama=Bush. Now I ask who you would vote for, if anyone, for president?
@jsu401 Yes I am an atheist but that has nothing to do with my political views. I view govt as a useful tool just like a carpenter would have. It may be used for demolition, or building roads and bridges, or defenses or other useful things. But if the tools make a mess of situation do you blame the tools or the carpenter weilding them.
Govt doesnt give me my morals society does.
Who would I vote for? I have always voted third party. My first vote was in 2000 for Nader.
Do you want a President or a scientist? The President is the Commander in Chief, he has the command to move the armed forces around, where will he fail in his mission as Commander in Chief if he doesn´t think like you? What the hell happened to America, to become President you have to be some sort of Miss America and answer all the questions right or else you can not command the troops? This isn´t a personality contest.
@RonPaulSwede How about a presiedent who is science literate? Is that such a bad choice?
America has always been like this with its presidents you moron. It is a personality contest. The biggest one there is. Unfortunately for you RP has a shitty one and is unelectable as president.
Of course it is a bad choice, you think personal beliefs go above and beyond KILLING PEOPLE WITH DRONES? Who gives a shit what they believe in, it has nothing to do with being President?
@RonPaulSwede And his personal beliefs dictate how he interprets the constitution and also how he chooses to sign amendments into it as well as the laws he signs thinking them constitutional or unconstitutional.
You can read plain and simple in the federalist papers how to interpret the consititution.
If you really think Obama even thinks if it is constitutional or not when he signs a bill then you are pretty far off, Obama doesn´t care about the Constitution at all, he ignores it. Look at foreign policy, it is the same shit as Bushy did yet liberals love Obama for it, it´s fuckin amazing to watch all these people on MSNBC laughing about killing people.
@RonPaulSwede And there is more than the federalist papers offers to interpreting the constitution. Why do you think our supreme court has more than 1 member in it and they always disagree on on decissions?
I never once said I was an Obama supporter. You are grasping at straws now.
The original intent is in the papers during that time, even I (who do not live in USA) have read some of it.
Supreme court? Ever heard of Excecutive order? Today the President can override any law and write an excecutive order, this was not it´s original intent and this goes the very fabric of the Constitution.
Did I say you were a Obama supporter? What I am saying is that he is doing the same thing as Bushy did but the left love him for it.
@RonPaulSwede Wrong. The FP was written by only 9 authors not all the founders and mostly by Madison. Its a narrow view.
Executive orders are nothing new the first having been done by Washington. They are essential to the ability of this govt to make quick decisions such as disaster relief. And an executive order doesnt override law completely. It gives the president certain abilities but not the power to override the constitution for anything but emergencies and only short periods.
From himself. Clearly he is utterly depressed at the current state of affairs in our country, and has decided to commit suicide. I know, it's irrational and hard to believe, but its the only reason why an honest, moral and ethical person would come against the mainstream establishment, pushing sound money, and non intervention, (Missile sales going down like.. Missiles?) This is what killed Lincoln and Kennedy. It's suicide I tell ya! Someone stop him! Don't jump!
this isn't a "Campaign" ad MOX it's from LibertyPAC, they are not from the official campaign, and if you donate the maximum to his campaign, but still have more to give, they can still accept it.
money bomb today goes to his official campaign at RonPaul2012
Basically its going to come down to... if ur voting for anyone BUT RonPaul, then u either have no idea and shouldn't be voting, or you are getting trickle down benefits from the Elite's Pyramid. - Ask sheeple if they are getting $ from Elite Bilderburger run businesses ;)
@aetheistnalabama if that isn't voting for someone based on their religious beliefs I don't know what is.... "if you're an atheist only vote for someone that's an atheist"... Cult mentality
@PostPetroleumPrepper The founding fathers didn't deal with the economics we do. $10,000 American dollars then is around $300,000 now. In fact the founding fathers for a large part of American history had a simple flat tax. Anyone who made more then that $10,000 a year, surrendered all of their income to the government.
They didn't have to worry about mundane stuff like groundwater reserves, oil spills thousands of miles deep and a war on drugs south of the border nearing civil war.
Ron Paul should run regardless of this BS nomination. He is the only one who can possibly make a difference. He is in it to win it so I see him on the ballot regardless as either a republican, or independent. Either way he has my vote.
@MutantKush Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, just to name a few. Sadly, it's now a requirement that republican candidates not only deny, but fight against, all science which doesnt agree with their theological position.
@MutantKush "(insert name) on creationism"....google it. Just because one is a christian, doesn't mean one is a creationist. They are two distinct entities, granted they are BOTH wrong, one is far more accepting of scientific progress. Most christians have come to terms with reality and accepted the fact that animals evolved by natural means, the earth is ~4.5 billion years old, etc. Creationists OTOH go to great lengths to deny it all in the face of conclusive evidence.
I just don't know what you mean. you said it's too hard to believe that he's really for the people if he doesn't actively support OWS. He's more "for the people" than any other candidate, including Barry. Dare you argue that? name one that represents individual rights more than Paul. if he doesn't get your vote, then who?
when as dereg ever happened? over the last 140 years or so, there has been a steady increase in government power and regulation, and subsequently, a steady decrease in individual liberty. sure, the government may provide a service for you, but when you accept that service, you forfeit your freedom of choice.
any government that is powerful enough to give you everything you want, is also powerful enough to take it all away. why not just have the freedom to do it yourself?
@MrDubDisciple We don't truly deregulate, we re-regulate. It is the growth of regulation that has lead to economic decline. The market has a tendency toward working out these problems on their own, in a stable way. The things that truly do need regulation can be better managed on the state level, where these things can be handled effectively. States will face different problems and different solutions are necessary.
@rpkymadisonco Good luck with 52 different battles for EACH individual regulation we end up deciding we actually need after some pure and moronic experiment with de-regulation. Ron Paul could moderate himself ever so slightly and win a lot of people like me.
I'll make you a deal, you get me a perp walk of the CEO's and Board of Directors of Chase, AIG, Goldman Sachs and any other you can think off and I'll vote Ron Paul. If Ron Paul promises me a perp walk I'll vote for him no questions asked.
Life is one big road with lots of signs. So when you riding through the ruts, don't complicate your mind. Flee from hate, mischief and jealousy. Don't bury your thoughts, put your vision to reality. Wake Up and Live!
Go Ron!!
cultofedward 3 months ago
Ron paul or die isnt enough. It is now Ron Paul or kill yourself before we kill you! God bless ron paul
M1LkYdUdS123 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ron Paul is the MOST DECEITFUL BASTARD RUNNING!!!
From the Party of DEREGULATION of business that has led to the demise of the Lower and then the Middle Classes, RON PAUL AND HIS ASSHOLE SUPPORTERS WANT MORE DEREGULATION.
Claiming he's a defender of freedom, his TRUE AIM IS A TOTAL OLIGARCHY.
NO SOCIAL PROGRAMS, NO RETURN OF BUSINESS TO THE US, NO
TAXES IN BUSINESS. ANARCHISTIC CAPITALISM AT ITS WORST.
He;s Reagen reincarnated and his supporters are American
yourtreat2 4 months ago
Powered by Duracell! Lol. GO RON PAUL!!!
kodguerrero 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
165 signatures left to our 10,000 strong petition to get Dr. Paul on 60 minutes. Please go to Change.org and help us save our country. For liberty!
IlluminatusAAA 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Youtube this:
"How To Vote For Ron Paul - Watch And Understand"
Then pass it on to help others elect Dr. Paul POTUS.
Vote4RonPaulLiberty 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Go to ronpaul2012 . com and purchase a $12 insulated mug, $6 yard sign, maybe a $30 hoodie to keep you warm when out in the cooling autumn air. Or, just donate a cash amount of your choice to the cause of liberty.
*** THANK YOU! ***
Vote4RonPaulLiberty 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Fucking Youtube altered the "news & politics" section!
You the people can no longer access the "most viewed" rankings which is part of how videos become viral by people checking out the rankings!
Instead Youtube now dictates the "top news" and what is "popular around the web" and even only displays a dozen or so of those where before you could browse thru ten pages of rankings!
This is like a mayor brain seizure in our collective brain.
virtusapiensrex 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DEAR RON PAUL SUPPORTERS -- please type "Fox news Happening Now" into google, bring up the site and vote for Ron Paul -- Cain is winning the poll at the moment, Ron Paul is in second. With your help, we can push Ron Paul's name to the top of the list. Thank you.
Halfstar3 4 months ago
I switched my designation by internet/mail last week from Independent to Republican in California. (I had to hold my nose). It takes less than 10 minutes. Just google register to vote and you're in. Just do it right now, folks. GO!
TheNameOfMyAccount 4 months ago
@TheNameOfMyAccount You dont have to swith parties to vote for Ron Paul in the primaries or for 2012 in California.
baydood510 4 months ago
What is with the sudden influx of trolls on this video?
TheOneartist 4 months ago
@TheOneartist You've heard "if you can't beat 'em, join 'em"?
It goes differently if you can't stomach joining them - then you smear them.
Those of an authoritarian slant hate Paul's argument for liberty and smear him.
Those of an anarchic* slant hate Paul's belief that we need government for some things - and so they smear him even though what he wants is FAR closer to what they want than anyone else is proposing.
* "anarchy" to be read as the dictionary definition, not the emotive one.
thirteenfingers 4 months ago
@thirteenfingers I don't even know why the anarchists are getting involved. The only way we can live without government is when we die, in Heaven. They're on the wrong videos.
TheOneartist 4 months ago
RON PAUL is the Freedom BOMB!
Oceanno69 4 months ago
it was soooo awesome to see this on CNN!!!!!!!!!!!!
DCUPtoejuice 4 months ago 2
wow Ron Paul is a fucktard, and shame on CNN for selling their souls to the tea baggers.
clownporn1 4 months ago
@clownporn1
why is he a fucktard?
Ending the wars, getting serious on the debt, pardening all non-violent drug offenders, stopping mass murder?
LOL, what are you a Dick Cheney supporter?
RyanR3volution 4 months ago
@RyanR3volution - well look at his plan you dumbfuck, he wants to eliminate most of the Gov departments. Also he is NOT for pardoning drug offenders, he wants to leave it to the States. Also he is not against war, he just doesn't want to pay for it, he would hire mercinaries to take care of all problems, and his plan would leave 250,000 unemployed, and would do nothing to help the debt.
I am a Alvin Greene supporter.
clownporn1 4 months ago
@clownporn1
Nice ad hominem.
Good, he wants to end government programs, that is great, this government is wasteful and inefficent.
Ron Paul would pardon all non-violent drug offenders, that is his word, look it up.
What?
He is against very anti war and would only fight in a declared war against a attacker.
LOL, it would balance the budget in 3 years, yes it would help the debt.
Good, 250,000 welfare employees that need to get a real job instead of sucking off the private market.
RyanR3volution 4 months ago
@RyanR3volution - watch?v=ws7Zp41fByE
He is for the tyranny of the State, not Big Brother Government.
'Good, he wants to end government programs, that is great, this government is wasteful and inefficent' - which parts?
and how is throwing people out of work good for the market?
clownporn1 4 months ago
@clownporn1 The video you linked to is him arguing for the exact opposite of "tyranny of the State".
What on earth do you get from that that you're now using against him?
His position is in the federal government. His efforts have always been to pull the federal government back to its constitutional limits and defer to the states anything not explicitly granted to it.
Once that is done the next step is to prevent the states overstepping their remit.
There's no tyranny in what he's saying.
thirteenfingers 4 months ago
@thirteenfingers - well if the the states descriminate, it's descrimination. get that!
the government is we the people, Ronny wants to burn that to the ground. I just think its hilarious.
watch?v=n3c5ZyVq-Hw
clownporn1 4 months ago
@clownporn1 Again you've linked a video, and again it doesn't say what you seem to be claiming it does.
He says government is a reflection of the people which is why the onus to make things better is upon the people. He wants the government back in its place.
How about we act like adults for a moment... let's cut off the conversation we've been having so far, and instead - can you outline exactly, and maturely, what you think Ron Paul is proposing and what you think should happen instead?
thirteenfingers 4 months ago
@thirteenfingers - google -hypocracy.
well Dr.Dumbfuck, he is only pro-government when the GOP is charge, isn't that something..
Ron Paul is all things to all people. To millions of Burmese cyclone victims, he is also a heartless bastard. Last Thursday, when a congressional resolution merely offering "condolences and sympathy" to the victims came up for a vote, Ronny was the only member of the entire US Congress to vote "NO"
he is also a Hipocrite
clownporn1 4 months ago
@clownporn1 Why is the government spending money to offer "condolences and sympathy"?
It costs money to form, table, debate and draft everything that goes through government... then costs more to process everything that comes after a YES vote.
What use are hollow "condolences and sympathy" to victims of a cyclone? Consider that they have lost homes and livelihoods and will likely NEVER receive the "condolences and sympathy" and it becomes clear that it's a hollow, self-serving gesture.
thirteenfingers 4 months ago
@thirteenfingers - resolution: In policy debate, a resolution or topic is a normative statement which the affirmative team affirms and the negative team negates. Resolutions are selected annually by affiliated schools...
the big crayon version: should congress give "condolences and sympathy" to Burma which was destroyed, Ron Paul said NO.. he was the only one, HE WAS THE ONLY ONE!
clownporn1 4 months ago
@clownporn1 And yet that still cost the taxpayer money. EVERYTHING that government does - from fighting wars to having a brainless vote on hollow gestures of sympathy which will do NOTHING to help ANYBODY and will NOT make them feel any better.
It was self-serving, hollow, feel-good nonsense.
thirteenfingers 4 months ago
@thirteenfingers - 'It was self-serving, hollow, feel-good nonsense.' - Charity and selflessness are universally hailed as virtues. Therefore, Altruism is for sheeple!
clownporn1 4 months ago
@clownporn1 Charity and selflessness are virtues. That which I called self-serving, hollow, feel-good nonsense was not charity and was not selflessness.
If the members of congress were motivated by charity and selflessness they wouldn't have had a vote - the would have individually put their hands in their pockets, taken out some of their money and given it to the charities working to help the cyclone victims.
Don't mistake government for charity.
thirteenfingers 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@thirteenfingers - 'the would have individually put their hands in their pockets, taken out some of their money and given it to the charities working to help the cyclone victims.' - a free market solution lmao XD, what bullshit. plus why should you giva a shit in the first place, you don't even live here?
you're just a government bigot, I pity you.
clownporn1 4 months ago
@clownporn1
HAHAHA
States rights were how this country was founded, the greatest threats in history came from centralized powers, not Witchita, Kansas.
The states are the ones who stood up to the fugitive slave laws, military consriction, censorship, embargoes. and so on
Which parts? All the beuracracy, and he handled that nicely in his plan.
Those jobs are workfare, not real jobs, the gov cannot create jobs, ever, only hire workfare.
RyanR3volution 4 months ago
@RyanR3volution - ask your parents about "states rights" - the secret word starts with N
clownporn1 4 months ago
@clownporn1
States rights were never used to impose slavery, that is just a monstrosity of a lie and ahistorical.
You know who also opposed States rights? Hitler did, but yeah... you are right, only bigoted support states rights, you and Hitler could not be that :D
RyanR3volution 4 months ago
@RyanR3volution - 'States rights were never used to impose slavery, that is just a monstrosity of a lie and ahistorical' - States' rights in U.S. politics refers to political powers reserved for the U.S. state governments rather than the federal government. It is often considered a loaded term because of its use in opposition to federally mandated racial desegregation, hence racism. Jefferson Davis stated States Rights as his excuse to hold slaves.
clownporn1 4 months ago
@clownporn1
No states rights were NEVER used to defend slavery, in fact it was the opposite, one of the reasons why the South Ceded was because the Northern states were using states rights to nullify the fugitive slave laws, the South wanted the federal government to force those states to abide with the federal fugitive slave laws.
You need to read some books
RyanR3volution 4 months ago
@RyanR3volution - Resolved, That the union of these States rests on the equality of rights and privileges among its members, and that it is especially the duty of the Senate, which represents the States in their sovereign capacity, to resist all attempts to discriminate either in relation to person or property, so as, in the Territories—which are the common possession of the United States—to give advantages to the citizens of one State which are not equally secured to those of every other State.
clownporn1 4 months ago
@clownporn1
The greatest threats to personal liberty come in the form of centralization, the most accountable governments are those of localities, you cannot say that centralized states protect rights.
Hitler say states rights as a enemy of his tyranny.
Advantages?
Everyone has the same rights, local governments can govern as they see fit as long as they do not infringe on the rights of others, your entire arguement is a ahistorical strawman
RyanR3volution 4 months ago
@RyanR3volution - The Preamble to the Confederate States Constitution begins: "We, the people of the Confederate States, each State acting in its sovereign and independent character..."
how is the tyranny of the local any different from tyranny of state?
in most cases local governments may be more corrupt and unaccountable than the federal government.
'your entire arguement is a ahistorical strawman ' - google - projection.
please at least try and debunk my claims
clownporn1 4 months ago
@clownporn1 Who would pay the "hired" mercenaries? Your comment makes no sense.
I'm not even FROM the USA and I know that Paul has repeatedly said we (and I say "we" as our army fights alongside yours) shouldn't be empire building, we shouldn't have invaded Iraq or Afghanistan and that we should "just come home".
thirteenfingers 4 months ago
@thirteenfingers - well the taxpayers you dumbfuck, most of the people in the army are poor. does Ron Paul have a JOB for them, maybe they should get rich. lmao XD
clownporn1 4 months ago
@clownporn1 YOU said "Also he is not against war, he just doesn't want to pay for it, he would hire mercinaries to take care of all problems."
Paul isn't a moron. He's not about to bring back the troops and then use taxpayer money to fund a MORE EXPENSIVE mercenary war (because it would be).
My point was that your comment made no sense and the question was rhetorical.
Paul would not just disband the military, he would bring them home. To reduce their numbers would be a gradual process.
thirteenfingers 4 months ago
@thirteenfingers - 'Paul would not just disband the military, he would bring them home. To reduce their numbers would be a gradual process.' - well you got my point about his plan
a FREE MARKET SOLUTION, and he did vote for the war in Afganistan.
it is still unempoyment you dumb fuck.
clownporn1 4 months ago
@clownporn1 It is not unemployment when you train up the troops for civilian jobs, meanwhile reducing taxes and restrictions so allowing businesses to create many, many more jobs than they currently can and then cutting back military numbers.
It's not unemployment when you retrain them and they get right into new jobs they are properly skilled for right away.
Paul voted to go after the perpetrators of 9/11, NOT to fight ongoing wars in Afghanistan or Iraq nor to engage in nation building.
thirteenfingers 4 months ago
@thirteenfingers - 'It's not unemployment when you retrain them and they get right into new jobs they are properly skilled for right away.' - that are 1$/hour, would you work 1$/hour. Because people cannot survive on slave wages, plus Ronny is for free trade so some mexican will get that job first. I repeat 'close to a million will be unemployed'.
how do YOU feel about the minimum wage? <------------- english, do you speak it!
clownporn1 4 months ago
@clownporn1 Typical extreme-case arguments.
It doesn't work that way.
Skilled workers DON'T get $1/hour.
The ONLY two reasons American companies have for employing Mexican labour are 1> The individual is better for the job than the American he competes against. OR 2> Government makes domestic labour too expensive so they employ illegal labour.
Paul's proposals would remove the motivation to employ foreign labour outright.
I speak English well enough to know the difference between ! and ? ;)
thirteenfingers 4 months ago
@thirteenfingers - well Ronny is against the Minimum wage... so 'Paul's proposals would remove the motivation to employ foreign labour outright'
clearly you know nothing about free trade
clearly you know nothing about wages
clearly you know nothing about the labour market
clearly you know nothing about states right
clearly you know nothing...
clownporn1 4 months ago
@clownporn1 Don't make the mistake of thinking that because you dislike what I'm saying that I know nothing about those things.
I run my own business on a shoestring budget. I know more about those things than most.
I know that I can't afford minimum wage for someone to come in and clean or sort out some clerical work I don't want to do. I can't provide the job as I would be BREAKING THE LAW. Instead, there's no job at all. I stay late and do it myself.
Minimum wage means fewer jobs.
thirteenfingers 4 months ago
@thirteenfingers - 'Minimum wage means fewer jobs' - if you're a greedy cunt.
'I run my own business on a shoestring budget. I know more about those things than most' - well then you're a knowlegable cunt, who owns a dildo shop
'I know that I can't afford minimum wage for someone to come in and clean or sort out some clerical work I don't want to do.' - you're a lazy cunt, because your lazy ass should give a fuck about YOUR buisness. and you're a lying cunt, tax breaks for small Busness
clownporn1 4 months ago
@clownporn1 What do I think about minimum wage?
I think the government has NO business interfering in the voluntary formation of a contract between me and whoever I want to work for.
I was looking for work when the minimum wage was brought in in the UK. The difference it made was stark.
Job availability went DOWN as a company who couldn't afford the minimum couldn't offer the job any more.
Rather than a low start and working up, minimum wage becomes a price tag.
thirteenfingers 4 months ago
@thirteenfingers - you didn't answer the question, would you work for a price around 1q/hour?
I'll I'm getting from this end is cricket______________cricket
clownporn1 4 months ago
@clownporn1 If I had to choose between no job at £6 an hour and a job at £1 an hour... yes, I'd take it.
I'd do what I've always done... work hard at any job I can get while building skills to get more.
If my business folded tomorrow (and being related to the construction industry it's an ever-present danger right now) I would work for £1/hour if that's the best I could get.
Question is, why does anyone pay MORE than minimum wage? The answer to that is why your $1/hour point is moot.
thirteenfingers 4 months ago
@thirteenfingers - moot, no it's legit because Ron Paul wants everyone to work 1$/hour, that would lower demand and that would cause massive inflation.
'If my business folded tomorrow (and being related to the construction industry it's an ever-present danger right now) I would work for £1/hour if that's the best I could get' - bullshit, you would be on Government bitching about socalism, lmao XD
clownporn1 4 months ago
@clownporn1 I've been unemployed. I had saved to get me by.
Usually I got a job here, at other times I left the country to get work. I take responsibility for myself and do not need the government to pick up the pieces when I end up out of work. Don't judge everyone by your standards.
Paul doesn't want everyone on $1/hour. He wants individuals to make private agreements with employers to work for a mutually satisfactory wage. I've already addressed the effect of minimum wage on PRICES.
thirteenfingers 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@thirteenfingers ' He wants individuals to make private agreements with employers to work for a mutually satisfactory wage' - yeah we had that already, they were called sweatshops. and corporations with an absolute top-down hierarchy that make their peons piss into a jar. yeah 'Unions' are a thing Ron Paul is against, so knock that shit off ya dumb cunt.
clownporn1 4 months ago
@clownporn1 In the 4 years I was a hard-working unskilled worker I got ONE raise or 20p/hour. Minimum wage is an anchor to unskilled wages, it increases the cost of goods and services and makes them LESS affordable for those who live on minimum wage. it skews the job market, it skews trade and causes more harm than it solves.
thirteenfingers 4 months ago
@thirteenfingers - 'Minimum wage is an anchor to unskilled wages, it increases the cost of goods and services and makes them LESS affordable for those who live on minimum wage.' - do you know about supply/demand?
more money into the economy increses demand, so more jobs. ok! you get get that you cunt
clownporn1 4 months ago
@clownporn1 Does he have jobs for them? Not government/taxpayer-funded ones, no.
He proposes to make America an irresistable prospect for businesses, to reduce business costs and allow private industry to provide more jobs.
It would work, it would create enough jobs to end the unemployment problem virtually overnight and (I know this from friend I have the US army) thanks to how good the military is at equipping their staff with useful skills they would be well placed to take up civilian jobs.
thirteenfingers 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@thirteenfingers - 'He proposes to make America an irresistable prospect for businesses, to reduce business costs and allow private industry to provide more jobs' - how do you feel about the minimum wage?
and private industry has done a great job as far as freedoms go, right?
well his plan would cut the military in half, millions would be out of work.
would working 1$/hour help the market
watch?v=Jue6fNL0CaU
would YOU work for 1$/hour?
clownporn1 4 months ago
@DidYouJustMakeThatUp
physical? what do you want him to do? punch Barry in the face? lol
NOLA556 4 months ago
Ron Paul , Ya'll
dholton711 4 months ago
Ron Paul is an ASSHOLE!!!
dunivant66 4 months ago
@dunivant66 really?
jnixongo00 4 months ago
@dunivant66
Takes one to know one.
RonPaulSwede 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ron Paul Money Bomb Oct 19th!!!!!!!! Go to Ronpaul2012[dot]com. Ron Paul Money Bomb Oct 19th!!!!!!!!Ron Paul Money Bomb Oct 19th!!!!!!!! Go to Ronpaul2012[dot]com.Ron Paul Money Bomb Oct 19th!!!!!!!!Go to Ronpaul2012[dot]com.Ron Paul Money Bomb Oct 19th!!!!!!!!Ron Paul Money Bomb Oct 19th!!!!!!!!Ron Paul Money Bomb Oct 19th!!!!!!!!
whippoorwillss 4 months ago
364 views 328 votes. Blacked out.
KenrayCan 4 months ago
@KenrayCan It's a common youtube glitch that fixes itself over time, drop the conspiracy nonsense.
snipzor 4 months ago
Need more ads attacking Mitt Romney! How are people still supporting that guy?
TMOvids 4 months ago
@TMOvids This is a fan-based ad by Revolution PAC. But check out the new official Ron Paul ad called "Consistent". It attacks Cain, Romney and Perry with their own quotes!
TheOneartist 4 months ago
I love the frat boy Paul cultists who never question where his money comes from for all these ads. You tools are as bad as the Obama drones. Change We Can Believe In! Obama had more individual support than any candidate ever, he must be a good, independant guy then. He also had more financial money than any candidate in history. Ron Paul gets most of his money from wealthy private donors, fundamentalist christian groups, and corporations. Shhhh! Don't tell the frat boys, they have their messiah.
youngbuck189 4 months ago
@youngbuck189 LOLWUT? Ron Paul gets most of his money from military donors and very devoted supporters. Sounds like you're describing Romney.
Besides, this ad isn't even an official one. It's run by a fan organization that went through all the trouble to air this nationally. And I applaud them.
Obama's "Change We Can Believe In" was an empty campaign slogan. Ron Paul actually has consistency and a detailed plan to back him up. Plus, he doesn't flip-flop or lie like Obama.
TheOneartist 4 months ago
@youngbuck189 His average donation is $50.00 or less when he raises millions in a day. You have no idea what your talking about.
StrandEvent 4 months ago
@StrandEvent Obama claimed the same thing, he had more average people donations than any candidate in American history, the most populary supported candidate in America history. It doesn't mean shit when he also gets much more money from financial institutions. You need to drop the Ron Paul cultism and realize he is just another career politician who is pandering to anti-imperialist Americans. Words mean nothing, Ron Paul's record DOES NOT prove him to be the man he claims to be.
youngbuck189 4 months ago
@youngbuck189 Couldn't be further from the truth.
brownowaltum 4 months ago
Comment removed
StrandEvent 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@StrandEvent yea i did drop acid, but i knew the same things before as i do now. why don't you stop being a cowardly white supremest and just grow a set and let em drop
youngbuck189 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@youngbuck189 I'll drop my "Ron Paul cultism" when you drop your self worship and grow passed your "I drop acid therefore I know all" psycho babble. - peace
StrandEvent 4 months ago
This last debate sucked. I was so sick of hearing the two meatheads bicker back and forth about each other's past and eating up all the time. I tried to think if Ronald Reagan would have involved himself in a pissing match like that and NO I don't think he would. Nor would he sling mud like these new guys. He was diplomatic like Ron Paul is and it's sad that the mainstream is just putting salt on the festering soar that the debates have become. Vote Ron Paul if you want a diplomat.
Slingblade420 4 months ago
The final batte is ON!
First things first:
1) Please donate for Ron on Oct 19
2) Please register Republican ASAP to vote in Republican primary (given the popularity of Ron some open states might enforce Republican registration)
LORDOFWARS8 4 months ago 8
Did they really air this on CNN!?!?!?
RonPaulSwede 4 months ago
@RonPaulSwede Surprisingly yes. I was at my college when I saw this literally every half hour in the lounge. The TV there is set to CNN.
StormofBladeZ 4 months ago
@RonPaulSwede Yeah apparently. I don't have TV, but I've read comments from people and also found a page that said this was the ad.
TheOneartist 4 months ago
I'll guarantee this....if Ron Paul wins the 2012 election then I would say you all have been swallowed by the biggest trap ever. Ron Paul getting elected in 2012 is virtually impossible UNLESS the campaign finance laws are changed.
Why?
Because Ron Paul doesn't have the backing of industry. And big business runs the world regardless of how you feel about it or how you vote.
koreancook1 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@koreancook1 Why not try?
Jononutoob 4 months ago
How many feel impotent without a gov official leading them through life?
I know how peachy keen you all think Ron Paul is....because, like a good politician, he is saying all the right things.
Wonder why that is? And why is he allowed to say such things without retribution from the PTB?
I think of a wolf in sheeps clothing.
I think you better be careful what you wish for. Stop relying on the gov to change things. I think your being naive and ignorant. Time will tell....
koreancook1 4 months ago
@tinylittlegnat2 sorry, but a great number of scientist have signed a letter explaining that evolution doesn't truly exist… that is in Darwin's definition.
DaBroskiBro 4 months ago
@DaBroskiBro Really because over 99% of biologists say it is true. So does over 100 years of research. What scientists signed this document? Do you have a link or are you talking out of your ass?
tinylittlegnat2 4 months ago
I could never vote for someone who denies evolution. I could never vote for Ron Paul.
tinylittlegnat2 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@tinylittlegnat2
Ok, tell that to the children you bomb in 3rd world countries you could not do anything about it, thank you.
RonPaulSwede 4 months ago
@RonPaulSwede Oh damn is that where my bombs went to. I thought I had lost them.
tinylittlegnat2 4 months ago
@tinylittlegnat2
You taxes payed for those, correct. Do you vote for the guy you want to marry or what´s up with these personal beliefs? Ron can believe in Santa Claus for all I care, who gives a shit.
RonPaulSwede 4 months ago
@tinylittlegnat2 LOL You troll. It's sad that there are actually close-minded people that wouldn't vote for him because of that, though.
TheOneartist 4 months ago
@TheOneartist Damn straight I wouldnt vote for a man who would deny reality. over 99% of biologists not only say evolution is true but it is used in medical research and in medicine used for decades. What kind of doctor doesnt believe in the science behind the medicine?
tinylittlegnat2 4 months ago
@tinylittlegnat2 Oh wow, seriously? I thought you were joking! So you'd seriously choose Cain or Romney or Perry over Ron Paul just because of this!?
The theory of evolution is still a theory. Otherwise, it wouldn't be called a theory. Yes, it is backed up by a lot of fact, but it's considered a theory. Besides, Ron Paul never even denied the theory of evolution. That's misreporting. In fact, in the video where he addressed this, he seemed to stand in the middle.
You're embarrassing yourself.
TheOneartist 4 months ago
@TheOneartist First off none of those dishonest retards you named believe in evolution.
Seond you have no understanding of what the word theory means. Gravity is a theory. The earth going around the sun is a theory. A theory is the highest achievement a hypothesis can achieve in the scinetific world.
Ron paul said in previosu debates he denies evolution.
tinylittlegnat2 4 months ago
@tinylittlegnat2 So what? What does believing in evolution really have to do with being president? It is not like he is going to force creationism and many of his other beliefs down peoples' throats. I know evolution is a fact but am I going to let some red herring issue like that overshadow the real issues such as the economy, our domestic and foreign policies? No. But if someone wants an athiestic messiah so badly then go ahead and write in Christopher Hitchens.
jsu401 4 months ago
@jsu401 Because I want my president to have the correct answers to the questions. And if he isnt smart enough to choose science over the box that says "god did it" then he isnt good enough to answer the hard questions like should we or should we not nuke an invading country that also has nuclear arms.
Also Christopher Hitchens is not elligible for president. Try again.
tinylittlegnat2 4 months ago
@tinylittlegnat2 Good luck finding a president that fits into that small box of criticism, simply put you will not find a person who agrees with every thing you to believe in unless of course you decide to run for president in which case you could vote for yourself. He has answered many of the relevent tough questions intelligently atleast, that have made other candidates squirm and squeal. I dont care if you believe in the FSM just so long as you will do your job & have a record to back it up.
jsu401 4 months ago
@jsu401 I dont need a president to agree with everything I agree with but I do need him to have a basic fundemental understanding of science if he is going to be making choices on my childrens educational sysytem.
tinylittlegnat2 4 months ago
@tinylittlegnat2 Except he is going to give choice of education and its standards back to the states so again his personal views are irrelevent. Try again. Though please tell who would you rather vote for, if anyone.
jsu401 4 months ago
@jsu401 No he wouldnt. Because that is not what the people want. America is a center left country. They like their public education and without federal funding most states couldnt afford to educate anyone past the fifth grade.
As president his personal views still matter because people look to a president for views and guidance. They do that with all peoples of authority. If he doesnt believe in reality then it hurts the education sysytem and the country. Look at the last idiot from texas.
tinylittlegnat2 4 months ago
@tinylittlegnat2 Yes he would. This country is more center right than left. What good has our federally run education system done for us? It hasn't raised grades more the opposite. And throwing more money at the problem isn't going to fix it, case and point with the bank and GM bailouts.
"As president his personal views still ..." And that is the crux of the matter. People trust the Government way too much and allow things like the Patriot Act to pass whether it be under Bush or Obama.
jsu401 4 months ago
@jsu401 Study after study and poll after poll says this country is more left than right. People like the things govt has given them. And our education system is good its the work ethic given to our children that is bad. If a child in the 50s got bad grades it is his fault now its the teachers fault. Thats a big part of the problem.
The govt is a tool to be weilded by the people. You dont blame the hammer for bending the nail you blame the shitting carpenter holding the hammer.
tinylittlegnat2 4 months ago
@tinylittlegnat2 I like to see these polls and studies you speak of. Ever hear of the ignorant majority? People like gov't taking care of them from cradle to grave, but one of the many problems with this is that it costs mucho dinero and it adds on to the national debt making it unsustainable, around 60 trillion worth of unfunded liabilities from Medicare and SS. I don't like the idea that the money I put into these programs knowing that they will not be here when I retire.
jsu401 4 months ago 2
@jsu401 The congressional budget office has stated repeatedly that ss has enough money to pay out for the next 20 to 30 years and after that pay out 80% full size payments in perpetuity. And that is if nothing is done to improve it. Your money will be there.
tinylittlegnat2 4 months ago
@tinylittlegnat2
Social Security has no actual money, the federal government used that money as soon as they got it, they used the social security funds to purchase treasury bonds.
We currently borrow the money to send out the social security checks, that is why people say it doesn't have any funds left.
As they push inflation on the US dollar it will devalue and reduce the US debt, with the side effect of also ruining US treasury bonds (of which the SS trust fund is currently invested.
RP2012
Dethreid 3 months ago
@tinylittlegnat2 "And our education system is good its the work ethic given to our children that is bad. " Disagree with the first part, agree with the last. Though in defense of students they have grown in an society of "Me" and instant gratification so one shouldn't be too suprised that many students do poorly, there are other factors too but these are a few of the biggest. If states could compete with one another and/or globally on education then best wins and others will follow that state.
jsu401 4 months ago
@jsu401 Competition between states does happen. Thats how we have some states being better at education than others. BTW notice high on the list are the liberal "Socialist" states.
And global competition is a race to the bottom. Notice how since clinton opened up NAFTA wages and benefits have dropped like a rock for Americans because the chinese will do back breaking labor for a dollar a day. It destroys the middle class.
tinylittlegnat2 4 months ago
@tinylittlegnat2 Gov't is indeed a tool, like a shield, but it was intended to be used to protect our rights spelled out in our constitution with the bill of rights and to leave the things unmentioned to the states. Though this is where you vehemently disagree that gov't was intended to be big correct? When the carpenter (Federal Gov't) starts to be doing something outside of its contract (Constitution) then it is in error.
jsu401 4 months ago
@jsu401 You are right that I disagree. The govt is what people want it to be. If it stayed small like you wanted it to we would have no dams, no interstate, no hospital systems, no electrical grid, etc etc. Things that make this country awesome. Things that make other people look at us and demand their country have.
Look at countries with small to no govt. Somalia comes to mind. Looks fantastic doesnt it.
tinylittlegnat2 4 months ago
@tinylittlegnat2
correct
geffel 4 months ago
@tinylittlegnat2 Also I do not look to gov't for my morals. Assuming you are an athiest I like to think you are on the same page that you don't need/want Big gov't for that matter to tell you what to believe in and what morals to follow. Obama=Bush. Now I ask who you would vote for, if anyone, for president?
jsu401 4 months ago
@jsu401 Yes I am an atheist but that has nothing to do with my political views. I view govt as a useful tool just like a carpenter would have. It may be used for demolition, or building roads and bridges, or defenses or other useful things. But if the tools make a mess of situation do you blame the tools or the carpenter weilding them.
Govt doesnt give me my morals society does.
Who would I vote for? I have always voted third party. My first vote was in 2000 for Nader.
tinylittlegnat2 4 months ago
@tinylittlegnat2
Do you want a President or a scientist? The President is the Commander in Chief, he has the command to move the armed forces around, where will he fail in his mission as Commander in Chief if he doesn´t think like you? What the hell happened to America, to become President you have to be some sort of Miss America and answer all the questions right or else you can not command the troops? This isn´t a personality contest.
RonPaulSwede 4 months ago
@RonPaulSwede How about a presiedent who is science literate? Is that such a bad choice?
America has always been like this with its presidents you moron. It is a personality contest. The biggest one there is. Unfortunately for you RP has a shitty one and is unelectable as president.
tinylittlegnat2 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@tinylittlegnat2 unfortunately for you , no one cares what you think
OuterDrake7000 4 months ago
@OuterDrake7000 If he wants my vote and the votes of people who give a shit if he is scietifically literate he better.
tinylittlegnat2 4 months ago
@tinylittlegnat2
Of course it is a bad choice, you think personal beliefs go above and beyond KILLING PEOPLE WITH DRONES? Who gives a shit what they believe in, it has nothing to do with being President?
RonPaulSwede 4 months ago
@RonPaulSwede What a candidate believes in has everything to do with being president.
tinylittlegnat2 4 months ago
@tinylittlegnat2
The President is there to uphold the Constitution, NOT use it as a personal ladder. What do they teach you in school?
RonPaulSwede 4 months ago
@RonPaulSwede And his personal beliefs dictate how he interprets the constitution and also how he chooses to sign amendments into it as well as the laws he signs thinking them constitutional or unconstitutional.
Do you even know what logic is?
tinylittlegnat2 4 months ago
@tinylittlegnat2
You can read plain and simple in the federalist papers how to interpret the consititution.
If you really think Obama even thinks if it is constitutional or not when he signs a bill then you are pretty far off, Obama doesn´t care about the Constitution at all, he ignores it. Look at foreign policy, it is the same shit as Bushy did yet liberals love Obama for it, it´s fuckin amazing to watch all these people on MSNBC laughing about killing people.
RonPaulSwede 4 months ago
@RonPaulSwede And there is more than the federalist papers offers to interpreting the constitution. Why do you think our supreme court has more than 1 member in it and they always disagree on on decissions?
I never once said I was an Obama supporter. You are grasping at straws now.
tinylittlegnat2 4 months ago
@tinylittlegnat2
The original intent is in the papers during that time, even I (who do not live in USA) have read some of it.
Supreme court? Ever heard of Excecutive order? Today the President can override any law and write an excecutive order, this was not it´s original intent and this goes the very fabric of the Constitution.
Did I say you were a Obama supporter? What I am saying is that he is doing the same thing as Bushy did but the left love him for it.
RonPaulSwede 4 months ago
@RonPaulSwede Wrong. The FP was written by only 9 authors not all the founders and mostly by Madison. Its a narrow view.
Executive orders are nothing new the first having been done by Washington. They are essential to the ability of this govt to make quick decisions such as disaster relief. And an executive order doesnt override law completely. It gives the president certain abilities but not the power to override the constitution for anything but emergencies and only short periods.
tinylittlegnat2 4 months ago
ALERT: SOMEONE SAVE RON PAUL.
From himself. Clearly he is utterly depressed at the current state of affairs in our country, and has decided to commit suicide. I know, it's irrational and hard to believe, but its the only reason why an honest, moral and ethical person would come against the mainstream establishment, pushing sound money, and non intervention, (Missile sales going down like.. Missiles?) This is what killed Lincoln and Kennedy. It's suicide I tell ya! Someone stop him! Don't jump!
nunyabizbitch 4 months ago
this isn't a "Campaign" ad MOX it's from LibertyPAC, they are not from the official campaign, and if you donate the maximum to his campaign, but still have more to give, they can still accept it.
money bomb today goes to his official campaign at RonPaul2012
If you're already maxed out, go to LibertyPAC
:)
iTellYouNoLie 4 months ago in playlist More videos from MOXNEWSd0tCOM 8
and if they confess trickle down pyramid cash - punch em in the face... lol!
1mmune3 4 months ago
Basically its going to come down to... if ur voting for anyone BUT RonPaul, then u either have no idea and shouldn't be voting, or you are getting trickle down benefits from the Elite's Pyramid. - Ask sheeple if they are getting $ from Elite Bilderburger run businesses ;)
1mmune3 4 months ago
"not a shill for the bankers" - WOW - nice!
1mmune3 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
LAST DAY TO PLEDGE FOR BLACKTHISOUT MONEYBOMB!!! LETS FOLLOW UP THIS DEBATE WITH A STRONG MESSAGE TO THE MEDIA!
blackthisout. com/users/espositoa
MrEmphasys 4 months ago
@Mrdubdisciple where in the hell do you gey your information? Please show me where in the constitution it says that?
PostPetroleumPrepper 4 months ago
Help Ron Paul beat the media blackout and Restore America Now! Donate during the Black THIS Out moneybomb Oct 19 and spread the message!
Taikaru 4 months ago 51
This has been flagged as spam show
LAST DAY TO PLEDGE FOR RON PAUL BLACKTHISOUT MONEYBOMB!!!
blackthisout. com/users/espositoa
MrEmphasys 4 months ago
BIG media buy by R3VOLution PAC!
Was jumping for joy when I saw it on TV!
RosenKrantz666 4 months ago 3
@aetheistnalabama if that isn't voting for someone based on their religious beliefs I don't know what is.... "if you're an atheist only vote for someone that's an atheist"... Cult mentality
PostPetroleumPrepper 4 months ago
@Mrdubdisciple how was this country founded? You don't think america used to be a great country?
PostPetroleumPrepper 4 months ago
@PostPetroleumPrepper The founding fathers didn't deal with the economics we do. $10,000 American dollars then is around $300,000 now. In fact the founding fathers for a large part of American history had a simple flat tax. Anyone who made more then that $10,000 a year, surrendered all of their income to the government.
They didn't have to worry about mundane stuff like groundwater reserves, oil spills thousands of miles deep and a war on drugs south of the border nearing civil war.
MrDubDisciple 4 months ago
I should correct myself, Americans in that time surrendered everything they made upwards of that $10,000. My mistake.
MrDubDisciple 4 months ago
:44 "The prophet" Are they for real?
This is so sad to watch.. Not the video that was pretty funny, but people who think they can elect this man.
If he does become president, please remember only those chosen to be president become president.. By choosing I dont mean by 'we the people' either.
JusticePetitioner 4 months ago
Ron Paul should run regardless of this BS nomination. He is the only one who can possibly make a difference. He is in it to win it so I see him on the ballot regardless as either a republican, or independent. Either way he has my vote.
WCNYBC 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
LAST DAY TO PLEDGE FOR RON PAUL BLACKTHISOUT MONEYBOMB!!!
blackthisout. com/users/espositoa
MrEmphasys 4 months ago
Ron Paul is a creationist, 'nuff said.
atheistNalabama 4 months ago
@atheistNalabama Which president hasn't been a creationist?
MutantKush 4 months ago
@MutantKush Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, just to name a few. Sadly, it's now a requirement that republican candidates not only deny, but fight against, all science which doesnt agree with their theological position.
atheistNalabama 4 months ago
@atheistNalabama No you are wrong. Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton are baptists and Obama is a christian...
MutantKush 4 months ago
@MutantKush "(insert name) on creationism"....google it. Just because one is a christian, doesn't mean one is a creationist. They are two distinct entities, granted they are BOTH wrong, one is far more accepting of scientific progress. Most christians have come to terms with reality and accepted the fact that animals evolved by natural means, the earth is ~4.5 billion years old, etc. Creationists OTOH go to great lengths to deny it all in the face of conclusive evidence.
atheistNalabama 4 months ago
@DidYouJustMakeThatUp
I just don't know what you mean. you said it's too hard to believe that he's really for the people if he doesn't actively support OWS. He's more "for the people" than any other candidate, including Barry. Dare you argue that? name one that represents individual rights more than Paul. if he doesn't get your vote, then who?
NOLA556 4 months ago
@NOLA556 My main gripe with Paul is his deregulation rhetoric. I'm sorry, dereg has never gone well. EVER.
MrDubDisciple 4 months ago
@MrDubDisciple
when as dereg ever happened? over the last 140 years or so, there has been a steady increase in government power and regulation, and subsequently, a steady decrease in individual liberty. sure, the government may provide a service for you, but when you accept that service, you forfeit your freedom of choice.
any government that is powerful enough to give you everything you want, is also powerful enough to take it all away. why not just have the freedom to do it yourself?
NOLA556 4 months ago
@MrDubDisciple We don't truly deregulate, we re-regulate. It is the growth of regulation that has lead to economic decline. The market has a tendency toward working out these problems on their own, in a stable way. The things that truly do need regulation can be better managed on the state level, where these things can be handled effectively. States will face different problems and different solutions are necessary.
rpkymadisonco 4 months ago
@rpkymadisonco Good luck with 52 different battles for EACH individual regulation we end up deciding we actually need after some pure and moronic experiment with de-regulation. Ron Paul could moderate himself ever so slightly and win a lot of people like me.
I'll make you a deal, you get me a perp walk of the CEO's and Board of Directors of Chase, AIG, Goldman Sachs and any other you can think off and I'll vote Ron Paul. If Ron Paul promises me a perp walk I'll vote for him no questions asked.
MrDubDisciple 4 months ago
That's a good ad
russkeller 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
RON PAUL IS BETTER THAN ALL OF THEN. REPUBLICANS ARE DONE. I MUST SAY IM AN OBAMA FAN. BUT RON PAUL DESERVES TO FACE OBAMA.
selmamyspace 4 months ago
this ad is very lol against rick perry and mitt romney
TheEZPAXIIChannel 4 months ago
To the Haters:
Life is one big road with lots of signs. So when you riding through the ruts, don't complicate your mind. Flee from hate, mischief and jealousy. Don't bury your thoughts, put your vision to reality. Wake Up and Live!
Bob Marley.
ShadowSandy 4 months ago 9
Wow those are some shitty political ads. And political ads stink.
snipzor 4 months ago
The NWO is silencing Ron Paul!
...by allowing him to show an ad every half hour on national television.
whatisahumans 4 months ago
Is this really playing every half hour?!? That's fantastic
JoNation1988 4 months ago
May God Bless & Protect Ron Paul
tigglebitty65 4 months ago 42
The media won't report him so I don't truth about Ron Paul. He could win the race.Obama came and win. Peace
zachgre1 4 months ago