K, I tested and packed various trojans with both of them.. Themida protection was detected by one AV: NOD32, and 9 other AVs declared it as suspicious.
But... RDG Tejon Crypter 0.9 was so superb, eventhough it's old ver and not stable and with less functions than 1.2.... absolutely no AV didn't detect it.. not even declare it as suspicious.. 0.o
Yes, it is true that Themida's obfuscation is the strongest I've ever seen, however is possible to reverse engineerer. Its just that virtualized functions are even harder.
where can i download RDG Tejon Crypter 0.9 im looking for it and i cant find it
ledviades 2 years ago
Has anyone of you tried RDG Tejon Crypter?
Some say it's the best, but I don't know... need to test it. I can get my hands only on 0.9, but latest ver, 1.2 is the best as peps say...
M1scV1d 2 years ago
K, I tested and packed various trojans with both of them.. Themida protection was detected by one AV: NOD32, and 9 other AVs declared it as suspicious.
But... RDG Tejon Crypter 0.9 was so superb, eventhough it's old ver and not stable and with less functions than 1.2.... absolutely no AV didn't detect it.. not even declare it as suspicious.. 0.o
M1scV1d 2 years ago
ah damn, nevermind.. the only reason why it wasn't detected by any AV, because it's not a threat after cryption, because it breaks all programs.
M1scV1d 2 years ago
Yes, it is true that Themida's obfuscation is the strongest I've ever seen, however is possible to reverse engineerer. Its just that virtualized functions are even harder.
AES256bit 3 years ago
you can evade A/V with a different compiler too :D
mfyyre 4 years ago
true
Xzun009 4 years ago