The constitution is a trust. We the people are the grantors and settlors...and we are the beneficiaries. So when you go to court for another bogus charge...tell the judge this: Your honor, I am a beneficiary of the preamble and a constituent member of the constitutional trust. Also, I am the Executor and beneficiary of the JOHN ROBERT DOE estate. I am hereby appointing you as my fiduciary trustee and I am directing you to discharge the charges.
That sounds great and all, but more likely the judge would say you are being held in contempt for saying something like that. Oh I agree you are right, but try telling the courts this truth.
(Part done of done) (…) The history of America is just like the history of any other country on this planet. It is a history of deception, fraud and corruption. There is nothing to return to for the integrity was never there to begin with. We must move forward, not backwards.~ Peter Joseph: Where Are We Going
(Part 10 of done) They certainly are but we need to hone our focus to resolving the actual problem. And by the way, for all the nationalists out there I am not attacking the US Constitution once again. However, it is not the answer and it’s naive to think that this document really has that much relevance.
(Part 9 of done) The Fourth Amendment is an attempt to protect people from State power abuse. That is clear. But it avoids the real issue, and that is: Why would the state have an interest to search and seize to begin with? How do you remove the mechanisms that generate such behavior? We need to focus on the real cause. To be clear again, I’m not saying that laws, rights are not needed at this time.
(Part 8 of done) It is meaningless semantically, therefore it cannot be trusted. None of them can. In other words, legal definitions are not empirical. All the amendments are subject to the whims of interpretation which is why they are abused by the police Homeland Security and the IRS on a daily basis. Therefore, back to my original point: There is no such thing as rights as the reference can be altered at will.
(Part 7 of done) What is “probable cause”? The only way to figure this out is to find a legal working definition that is culturally accepted. A common definiton of probable cause in this context is: A reasonable belief that a person has committed a crime. So the qualifier is now reasonable, right? Reasonable: This is often defined as “fair” not excessive or extreme. Then I guess we have to move on to the word “excessive”. You see my point, I hope.
(Part 6 of done) I know many people like this. I’m a fan of many people who are proponents of this, in part, because I think there’s a place for it. But this document is not the “savior” of America. (...) The Fourth Amendment details how people have “Protection from unreasonable searches and seizures”. This statement is basically qualified by the termed notion of “probable cause” in the amendment.
(Part 5 of done) Now, while I understand the value of this document and the temporal brilliance of it in the context of the period of its creation that does not excuse the fact that it is a product of social inefficiency and nothing more. In other words, declarations of laws and rights are actually an acknowledgment of failures of the social design. There are many people today in the so-called “Patriot” and “Liberty” movements.
(Part 4 of done) An intelligent commandment would be something like: “Thou shalt continually re-orient thyself and society to reduce reactionary propensities that lead to aberrated consequences such as stealing and murder.” The same surface irrelevancy applies to any Constitution or Bill of Rights of any country on this planet. In the Bill of Rights of the United States, there is an attempt to secure certain freedoms and protections by way again of mere text on paper.
(Part 3 of done) As a classic example of this, let’s take the notion of divine law the famed Ten Commandments: “Thou shalt not steal. Thou shalt not murder”. Why? These are surface notion cop-outs created by men who didn’t have any real information who did not understand that we live in a cause-and-effect reality. Telling people this does virtually nothing, as history has proven. Morality is an empty idea that has no empirical referent.
(Part 2 of done) And once again, instead of seeking a true solution to a problem we invent these patches by way of paper proclamations in an attempt to resolve them. This does not work. It has never worked. There is really no such thing as an unalienable right outside of the culture in which it is assumed. We are making this up! Therefore, liberties need to be inherent in a social system by design not alluded to ambiguously on paper.
(Part 1 of done) Today we use paper proclamations, as we call them to denote a person’s so-called rights. And just like laws, they are culturally biased artificial concoctions, which attempt to solve reoccurring problems by simply declaring something with words on paper usually. Rights, infact, have been invented to protect ourselves from the negative by-products of the social system itself.
Democrats should consider voting in the republican primaries for Ron Paul, based upon the national discussion it could create for the notion of international Peace and corporatism.
Even if they don't vote for him in the general election.
Do you Really want Newt or Romney to run any risk of being president? Really?
A nomination for Ron Paul to be GOP nominee at least keeps the possiblity of a warmonger out of the equation.
while the concept is true, anyone has the right, and thus uses to self concract. thus making the consti. void and overriding it with other contracts. a speeding ticket is unconstitutional. but its void since u signed the dmv(bmv) contract which 99.9999% doesnt read. u can superceed a contract with another contract. did u sign the constitution...? no.. there for, u aint a party to it... go to court...
Mr. Ott, this is the Best use of YouTube I have ever seen! I am looking forward to the next installment. May our Lord and Savior bring our country back from the brink.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
The constitution is the problem. Freedom can not last in a system based on public law. Democracies, Republics etc. will inevitably become totalitarian no matter where they start. There is no reason to like the constitution or any constitution. Read David Friedman, Hans Hermann Hoppe and search for "Stefbot" here on Youtube for more info on why Anarchism is the only peaceful system
@niklasbastholmhansen Peaceful until someone with more power than you enforces their will on you and you have no recourse. I'm bigger, better armed, and have more money than you so I should kill you and take your stuff, there isn't any law to stop me in your anarchy because I'll just bribe people to take my side. Oh, wait, that's pretty much how it works now anyway.
Hi Dragdamar. Thanks for your post. I understand your worries, but they are completely unfounded. I have had the same worries. Anarchy is not chaos, many people seem to believe so. Anarchism would prevent the sort of violence you write about much better than any statist system. I Have sent you a link to a book you can download so that you can understand yourself. The book is only 64 pages. Its worth the read ;)
@niklasbastholmhansen Anarchy is not chaos? try living in a world with no jail time threat to criminals and people on drugs. More crime, women raped, MEN RAPED!. all until people run back to the government for help.
Hi there Chipareu. The definition of Anarchy is "stateless" society, a society without a state with the monopoly on force. Just like any other monopoly the business model does not disappear because you break up that monopoly. You would still have jails and you would still have the rule of law in a stateless society. It might seem difficult to comprehend because anarchism is such a different system from state mafias. If you are interested in learning about anarchism text me.
Anarchy is super interesting, because no one has ever taught you about how society would work without a central monopoly based on violence. If you want a 3 hour quick info on anarchism then download the free book "chaos theory" by Robert Murphy. The book explains how military defense, police, law, judges etc. are provided in a free society where you don't have a violent state. It is really a fascinating read. You will be surprised what the free market would give you ;)
Dr. Paul NEEDS US. If you have not given, and can, please do so now. Let's show the liberals and neocons that there is another voice in America. Dr. Paul can win! Liberty can win! The globalists and bankers think they can control the very minutes of our lives. NOW is the time to show them they cannot.
I find that Americans ignore unconstitutional laws, bills, acts, etc. until they find something that ignores them and then they just focus on that particular thing. Sad.
Sometimes pjtv is cool. Other times it shows how this country will fail because of the terrorists that make these stupid videos and the ones who enjoy them. How about you slaughter the left and get it over with. I know it's what you want
youtube.com Suffolk County Court Corruption. They have violated Color of Law, Due process, and all my rights.
corruptioncourts 4 weeks ago
wow i kinda want to be the first to dislike this video
CompilationsRus 1 month ago
The constitution is a trust. We the people are the grantors and settlors...and we are the beneficiaries. So when you go to court for another bogus charge...tell the judge this: Your honor, I am a beneficiary of the preamble and a constituent member of the constitutional trust. Also, I am the Executor and beneficiary of the JOHN ROBERT DOE estate. I am hereby appointing you as my fiduciary trustee and I am directing you to discharge the charges.
solutionist1014 1 month ago
@solutionist1014
That sounds great and all, but more likely the judge would say you are being held in contempt for saying something like that. Oh I agree you are right, but try telling the courts this truth.
pluto4847 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Lol, the constitution is littered with religious connotations and/or primitive assumptions of reality.
MyMindTank 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
(Part done of done) (…) The history of America is just like the history of any other country on this planet. It is a history of deception, fraud and corruption. There is nothing to return to for the integrity was never there to begin with. We must move forward, not backwards.~ Peter Joseph: Where Are We Going
MyMindTank 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
(Part 10 of done) They certainly are but we need to hone our focus to resolving the actual problem. And by the way, for all the nationalists out there I am not attacking the US Constitution once again. However, it is not the answer and it’s naive to think that this document really has that much relevance.
MyMindTank 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
(Part 9 of done) The Fourth Amendment is an attempt to protect people from State power abuse. That is clear. But it avoids the real issue, and that is: Why would the state have an interest to search and seize to begin with? How do you remove the mechanisms that generate such behavior? We need to focus on the real cause. To be clear again, I’m not saying that laws, rights are not needed at this time.
MyMindTank 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
(Part 8 of done) It is meaningless semantically, therefore it cannot be trusted. None of them can. In other words, legal definitions are not empirical. All the amendments are subject to the whims of interpretation which is why they are abused by the police Homeland Security and the IRS on a daily basis. Therefore, back to my original point: There is no such thing as rights as the reference can be altered at will.
MyMindTank 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
(Part 7 of done) What is “probable cause”? The only way to figure this out is to find a legal working definition that is culturally accepted. A common definiton of probable cause in this context is: A reasonable belief that a person has committed a crime. So the qualifier is now reasonable, right? Reasonable: This is often defined as “fair” not excessive or extreme. Then I guess we have to move on to the word “excessive”. You see my point, I hope.
MyMindTank 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
(Part 6 of done) I know many people like this. I’m a fan of many people who are proponents of this, in part, because I think there’s a place for it. But this document is not the “savior” of America. (...) The Fourth Amendment details how people have “Protection from unreasonable searches and seizures”. This statement is basically qualified by the termed notion of “probable cause” in the amendment.
MyMindTank 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
(Part 5 of done) Now, while I understand the value of this document and the temporal brilliance of it in the context of the period of its creation that does not excuse the fact that it is a product of social inefficiency and nothing more. In other words, declarations of laws and rights are actually an acknowledgment of failures of the social design. There are many people today in the so-called “Patriot” and “Liberty” movements.
MyMindTank 1 month ago
(Part 4 of done) An intelligent commandment would be something like: “Thou shalt continually re-orient thyself and society to reduce reactionary propensities that lead to aberrated consequences such as stealing and murder.” The same surface irrelevancy applies to any Constitution or Bill of Rights of any country on this planet. In the Bill of Rights of the United States, there is an attempt to secure certain freedoms and protections by way again of mere text on paper.
MyMindTank 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
(Part 3 of done) As a classic example of this, let’s take the notion of divine law the famed Ten Commandments: “Thou shalt not steal. Thou shalt not murder”. Why? These are surface notion cop-outs created by men who didn’t have any real information who did not understand that we live in a cause-and-effect reality. Telling people this does virtually nothing, as history has proven. Morality is an empty idea that has no empirical referent.
MyMindTank 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
(Part 2 of done) And once again, instead of seeking a true solution to a problem we invent these patches by way of paper proclamations in an attempt to resolve them. This does not work. It has never worked. There is really no such thing as an unalienable right outside of the culture in which it is assumed. We are making this up! Therefore, liberties need to be inherent in a social system by design not alluded to ambiguously on paper.
MyMindTank 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
(Part 1 of done) Today we use paper proclamations, as we call them to denote a person’s so-called rights. And just like laws, they are culturally biased artificial concoctions, which attempt to solve reoccurring problems by simply declaring something with words on paper usually. Rights, infact, have been invented to protect ourselves from the negative by-products of the social system itself.
MyMindTank 1 month ago
I am glad the US Consititution gives us freedom of religion, speaks and other rights.
TheTigger3212 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Search "Blue Republican"
Democrats should consider voting in the republican primaries for Ron Paul, based upon the national discussion it could create for the notion of international Peace and corporatism.
Even if they don't vote for him in the general election.
Do you Really want Newt or Romney to run any risk of being president? Really?
A nomination for Ron Paul to be GOP nominee at least keeps the possiblity of a warmonger out of the equation.
Plus it irks the neocons.
Premier112 1 month ago
try it out for urslef
logicisreasonable 1 month ago
while the concept is true, anyone has the right, and thus uses to self concract. thus making the consti. void and overriding it with other contracts. a speeding ticket is unconstitutional. but its void since u signed the dmv(bmv) contract which 99.9999% doesnt read. u can superceed a contract with another contract. did u sign the constitution...? no.. there for, u aint a party to it... go to court...
logicisreasonable 1 month ago
@logicisreasonable well said
chipareu 1 month ago
Our President and American people need to be required to read and recite this.
imhbao 4 months ago
Thumbs up if you know the background music was J.S. Bach, Brandenburg Concerto #1, first movement.!
koyunbaba73 4 months ago
Nice to meet you Scott Ott. I am Charlie Arlie.
chuck3668831 4 months ago
Mr. Ott, this is the Best use of YouTube I have ever seen! I am looking forward to the next installment. May our Lord and Savior bring our country back from the brink.
kruegerhaus 4 months ago 2
Whoa, Scott! Did you just lose a bunch of weight? You seem ... smaller. Good job, Bro.
HumbleWillis 4 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The constitution is the problem. Freedom can not last in a system based on public law. Democracies, Republics etc. will inevitably become totalitarian no matter where they start. There is no reason to like the constitution or any constitution. Read David Friedman, Hans Hermann Hoppe and search for "Stefbot" here on Youtube for more info on why Anarchism is the only peaceful system
niklasbastholmhansen 4 months ago
@niklasbastholmhansen Peaceful until someone with more power than you enforces their will on you and you have no recourse. I'm bigger, better armed, and have more money than you so I should kill you and take your stuff, there isn't any law to stop me in your anarchy because I'll just bribe people to take my side. Oh, wait, that's pretty much how it works now anyway.
Dragdamar 1 month ago
@Dragdamar
Hi Dragdamar. Thanks for your post. I understand your worries, but they are completely unfounded. I have had the same worries. Anarchy is not chaos, many people seem to believe so. Anarchism would prevent the sort of violence you write about much better than any statist system. I Have sent you a link to a book you can download so that you can understand yourself. The book is only 64 pages. Its worth the read ;)
niklasbastholmhansen 1 month ago
@niklasbastholmhansen Anarchy is not chaos? try living in a world with no jail time threat to criminals and people on drugs. More crime, women raped, MEN RAPED!. all until people run back to the government for help.
chipareu 1 month ago
@chipareu
Hi there Chipareu. The definition of Anarchy is "stateless" society, a society without a state with the monopoly on force. Just like any other monopoly the business model does not disappear because you break up that monopoly. You would still have jails and you would still have the rule of law in a stateless society. It might seem difficult to comprehend because anarchism is such a different system from state mafias. If you are interested in learning about anarchism text me.
niklasbastholmhansen 1 month ago
@niklasbastholmhansen ok understood anarchy usually mean no law, no police, etc.
chipareu 1 month ago
@chipareu
Anarchy is super interesting, because no one has ever taught you about how society would work without a central monopoly based on violence. If you want a 3 hour quick info on anarchism then download the free book "chaos theory" by Robert Murphy. The book explains how military defense, police, law, judges etc. are provided in a free society where you don't have a violent state. It is really a fascinating read. You will be surprised what the free market would give you ;)
niklasbastholmhansen 1 month ago
@Dragdamar
Where can I send the book to? email address?
niklasbastholmhansen 1 month ago
Thanks.
OccidentalSoapbox 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dr. Paul NEEDS US. If you have not given, and can, please do so now. Let's show the liberals and neocons that there is another voice in America. Dr. Paul can win! Liberty can win! The globalists and bankers think they can control the very minutes of our lives. NOW is the time to show them they cannot.
wicker762 4 months ago 2
yes, yes!
nottinmatterz2day 4 months ago
I find that Americans ignore unconstitutional laws, bills, acts, etc. until they find something that ignores them and then they just focus on that particular thing. Sad.
tolynette 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Sometimes pjtv is cool. Other times it shows how this country will fail because of the terrorists that make these stupid videos and the ones who enjoy them. How about you slaughter the left and get it over with. I know it's what you want
Veredika 4 months ago
@Veredika Educating them is preferable, but challenging, since they already believe themselves to be educated.
frogsoda 4 months ago in playlist More videos from Pajamasmedia
@Veredika We would but it's unconstitutional. See what I did there?
trottheblackdog 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Veredika That sounds like hate speech to me. Who said anything about liberals in the video anyway?
1uphydro 4 months ago
Thank you Sir.
U2XM202 4 months ago
Thanks for educating the masses!
stratkeeper 4 months ago 6
Looking forward to the rest of the series. Keep it up PJTV
Covermeporkins11 4 months ago 10
Good series Idea Mr. Ott.
I'm looking forward to the rest.
stxrobstar 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Excellent and simple presentation. I'm looking forward to next parts. Thanks.
1magistus 4 months ago 3
Comment removed
1magistus 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You have a thesaurus. Congrats faggot.
Veredika 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Veredika: "Congrats faggot."
Stay away from mirrors, Braintrust. You'll go blind doing that.
PoliticallyBlazed 4 months ago 2
@Veredika cool story bro.
TacticalNotIncluded 4 months ago 2
Comment removed
richardcadbury 4 months ago
first and nice video scott as always.
xHippieHunter 4 months ago