Some of you people wouldn't believe bigfoot was real if it was right in front of you. Looks to me like that this video shows alot of proof. If you don't see it, your blind.
Bubba...a nice new eminaz account... lol Lots of hunters have seen a Bigfoot, but they haven't shot or killed one because it seemed too human, and in such a situation you bet there's doubt and reluctance to blast away at it... Actually, there may have been the odd kill, but who wants to known as the first official person to kill another human species specimen.
There never was a Bigfoot! Ever! It's an old Indian joke! That's it. Over and done. All the photos and videos are blurry! Maybe Bigfoot is blurry and that would make it scarier!
For the record...every single argument used against the existence of Big Foot was used against the existence of the mountain gorilla.
No bones..No traces in the fossil record...No photos...No remains..hair or otherwise, etc. etc.
Such arguments did not make the mountain gorilla any less real. I also never read any apologies from the people who mocked those who accepted the mountain gorilla as real.
I just hope one day you all see something that you can just not explain with no logical explanation what you saw and you post it on youtube and are played the fool where you werent their to see or even feel the rush runnin through some of these peoples bodies seeing something thats real but how do you explain your truth would you liked to be called a liar when your truth is seen with your own two eyes.. Your out their why cant something else be..
Be realistic, have you seen a Bigfoot? If not then why do you assume we're all ignorant for thinking its a stupid idea? There is NO evidence out there, if there is then please go and find some...
bigfoots are real teddy roosavelt is a pres. and he is along side us few in believing there real but fu if you cant see the so called writting on the wall
Hey Gilbert, found one person said about Chilcutt, the clown said that the casting process can create lines that appear to be ridges. Chilcutt is a pro, not someone on youtube thinking they are intelligent when they haven't even seen the original, they see the fifteenth copy, then watch a small pix on youtube and all of a sudden their Eisenstein. Back to ridges, lets see the guy make casts of fake prints and show how his theory is correct instead of just flapping his lips.
Why didn't you press "reply?" Its simple. First of all, what original copy? You haven't seen the original because it was "lost" in 1970...so i'm a bit confused as to what you're talking about. Also, google "chilcutt mistaken" and see for yourself, you haven't even read the article and yet you're damning it? haha, ironic since you claimed i was trying to be an "Einstein." Show me ONE paper written by Chillcut... there is none, why? Because he's talking rubbish.
Chillcut has twice given his seal of approval to already established fakes.... even Dahinden had to laugh when Chillcut was amazed my a Freeman fake which Dahinden regarded as "100%" fake, what an embarrassing fail for a supposed expert. An expert who's yet to write even one paper on his findings. Regarding the PGF, there is NO original copy and i guarantee i know more about this film than you or Chillcut, its a fake and if you can't see that then you're blind.
Here's challenge for you, move your ass out of home and spend week in forests of Washington or swamps of florida.I m sure u would run away after one night.But offcourse you wont do that because u are just internet troll. 25% of US is untouched by human foot and there are even more remoat areas in canada.
PGF is 100% real. Watch planet of ape from 68 I mean in those days even hollywod was not able to make suit like that so how in the hell 2 cowboys could do it! Open your mind
Here's a challenge for you, grow up. You're asking me to spend some time out in the forest looking for a giant ape-man? Are you high? Why should i be scared? Show me one incident where a sasquatch harmed a human rather than a human scaring away a sasquatch, haha. I work with response here in UK, i risk being stabbed to death in deprived areas every day, kids here carry sawn-off shotguns daily, google search "Croxteth and Norris Green" and then you tell me i'm scared of Bigfoot, idiot
PGF is 100% real? Really? Is that why Roger Patterson drew a picture of a female Bigfoot with breasts in his book "Abominable Snowmen of America" based on the William Roe encounter, is that also why he intended to make a movie based on the same idea but ran out of funding? The same movie was later re'made by ANE (a company Roger worked for as a "wildlife photographer") and was later re'named "Sasquatch: the Legend of Bigfoot." Open your eyes mate, its a hoax.
I dont ask u to tell me your life story about plastic shout guns and deprive areas so stop wasting my time with stuff that i dont care. P just drew what william roe saw so what is your point?If it looks like creature from movie that convince me even more that those encounters are similar.He wanted to make a movie cause he was interest in this subject -this proves nothing.U want to convince me by discredit patty?.TIll now movie is way more convincing than your trash talk
Haha, plastic shotguns, kid, seriously. Duh, well you don't find it odd that Patterson writes a book about Bigfoot, draws a female Bigfoot a lot like Patty based on the story he was obsessed with from Roe, then he intends to make a movie based on it, runs out of money and then magically shoots a "real" film of a female Bigfoot? What does Patty look like really? Get real, we see it from one angle, for 30 seconds on a grainy film from 40 yards away... pffft, my trash talk, are you 13?
haha maybe u want HD 3D footage from every angle from 60's of creature that is so allusive that with all our knowlage we cant even find it?! .This 30s is psychical prove of bf existence ,its much more veritable than empty trashtalk of bob h.Every 1 can say."HEY IT WAS ME IN THE SUIT"
.Show me facts ABOUT ACTUAL FOOTAGE that proves to u that this is a hoax ,what looks fake to you, what proves to you that this movie is fake beside stories of ppl that wasnt even there.
No, but how can you say we've seen nothing like this when all we see is a blurry, one angled shot of a Bigfoot from 30 yards away? If you saw Chewbacca under the same set of circumstances it might also seem real, use your brain. This footage is physical proof? No, DNA, bones and scat are physical proof, where you born yesterday? Bob H. passed 2 lie detector tests, did Roger or Gimlin? No, they refused to take one. You also avoided what i said about the impossible processing... why?
I watched hundred of movies most of them where fakes and non of them showed as many details as pgf movie and it was made 40 years ago!Footage is good enough to see muscle movment,creature has right hight,they even took foot prints cast,everything in movie proves that this is real.U wanna prove that its fake dont tell me those stupid stories that canot be proven,show me suit, made with 60's technolgy that will show all pg creature characteristic like muscle movement under hair.
What muscle movement?!! The biggest and most flexible muscle that should be moving here is staying completely still - the butt.... why does the butt just remain still and look like a huge diaper? You can even see at the top of the thigh, it looks like a huge pair of underpants, its a joke, haha. Look at the ass cheeks, they don't move, when we walk...our ass moves in conjunction with our legs, its biology, show me where you see that here.
"The process is complex and exacting, requiring technicians with extensive chemistry training, as well as large, difficult-to-operate machinery. This effectively precludes amateurs or small laboratories from processing Kodachrome. Development took anything from 2-3 working days and was most notably completed during the working week as most Kodak labs closed on weekends." - From (a History of Kodachrome) so was Roger a Magician? haha, Jesus
I showed you a fact and you ignored it.... Roger said he sent the film off on Friday evening... (NO MAIL WAS DELIVERED TO OR FROM EUREKA ON WEEKENDS) and said he had it processed in Seatlle on Saturday and ready to view at DeAtleys on Sunday. No he never... why? (BECAUSE KODACHROME TOOK UP TO 3 DAYS TO PROCESS) Go and google search anything about Kodachrome development in the 60's.... Roger got caught lying again, he actually filmed this in early September, just as Bob H. said.
Polygraph proves nothing its not even veritable enough to be used as prove in court and btw patterson passed polygraph test for wild life magazine.Until u wont show me suit with muscle movement that was made using technology available in 60's u can shut up and stop wasting my time with your stories about patti cause that proves nothing!Movie is real prove.Its funny how u believe in bobby stories ,some red neck that has no proves,no costume and even not enough hight.
My God, are you stupid? The point is that Bob H. VOLUNTEERED to take a poly, why the hell would he volunteer if he was a liar? He passed.... then he VOLUNTEERED to take another, why? He was given the test by the worlds leading specialist and he passed again on LIVE TV! He passed twice, on two seperate occassions, and he's a liar? Are you that desperate to believe in Sasquatch? Not enough height? Bob was 6'4"... Patty was 6'5".... even Roger and Gimlin said Patty was 6'5",
John Green, John Napier, Jim Mclarin, Grover Krantz, Roger Patterson and Bob Gimlin ALL SAID that the Bigfoot was about "6 and a half feet..." Bob H was the RIGHT SIZE! Do you know anything about this at all?
Haha, Roger NEVER passed a poly, the magazine you're referring to was one that he worked for, haha, he was the wildlife photographer/filmmaker for ANE, the same company that later re'made the movie Roger was going to make about Bigfoot, and he NEVER took a poly, seriously, do you enjoy being made to look like an idiot?
U post shit that proves nothing i told u show me suit with muscle movment like that ,that will only convince me, until u dont do that u can just shut up.Discovery channel found exact spot where movie was taken and they measure creature hight to be 7.6 foot tall.I said that polygraph its not an evidence and u still say shit that is,Maybe your mom smoke to much when she was pragnet cause U are too stupid for discussion rly check out your head cause u have some brain demage.
Haha, kid, you FAILED! I proved that Roger NEVER had this film processed in one day, it was impossible, what do you have to say about that? You still haven't talked about the big underpants that the Bigfoot seems to be wearing, or the fact that the butt DOESN'T MOVE AT ALL. 7 foot tall? Are you fucking high?
"Well when the creature walked around the creek, it sorta stood up tall, it must have been around 6 feet tall, i'd say even as big as six and a half feet." - Roger Patterson.
So Roger and Gimlin where THERE WHEN IT HAPPENED and they said it was 6 and a half feet tall, and you're saying it was 7 foot six inches? Hahaha, kid, are you 12?
I see u dont know a lot about math so i will explain it to u more clearly , when u have all the data , distance camera frame,etc, u can actually calculate true hight of subject. And they calculate patterson big foot to be at least 7.6 feet tall.---> /watch?v=FdEGrnsYJWY&feature=related 3:00
U didnt know about patty polygraph so again here u are:
/watch?v=85brXp6r3S8&feature=related
11:00 check out , Patterson passed polygraph test for wild life magazine.
Haha, math? Well basically your whole fucking experiment is severely flawed unless you know the distance between the subject and the camera... and since even Bill Munns came out last year and said that none of these details were known its still all guesstimation, so you're pretty wrong. Munns also said that all height and weight measurements were uncertain, go check out the JREF forums, Bill Munns has been posting there for a few years, its all there in his own words.
Like i said, Patterson, Gimlin, Krantz, Green, Dahinden and Mclarin all gave a height of "six and one half feet.." You're truly gullible aren't you? There is NO record of any Patterson polygraph, the supposed story was published in the magazine that Patterson worked for, by his own FRIEND! haha, Heironimus took 2 on national television, both were recorded and the results are available on the internet, they were conducted by the worlds leading polygrapher. Any more errors to show?
Haha, kid, this proves i know nothing? Seriously... okay, lets see how much you know, tell me how Roger got his Kodachrome processed in 24 hours and where he had it done.
Notice how every single piece of footage is blurred, or shaky, or grainy, or some combination of the three, and always at a considerable distance? That's because if it was clear and up close, it would be laughingly obvious that these are nothing more than gorilla suits, like cheap leftovers from the 50's sci-fi dud "Robot Monster." LOL, people are so gullible, it's pathetic.
After seeing the original film from Ms Patterson taken frame by frame with a digital microscope, its the best view of a real bigfoot ever. There is Zero chance barley now then alone 40 tears ago of a suit conforming to every muscle group. Freeman-fake. Wild creek-pathetic. Three toes- pathetic. There are a few, like 10 prints maybe, that were cast from a mud area that showed dermal ridges, absolute proof they were real, and absolute proof there is a bigfoot.
Zero chance? How can you tell? We see the Patterson Bigfoot from a distance of 30 yards, on a grainy camera, from one angle and for about 25 seconds, if we saw Chewbacca under the same circumstances he may also look very real. Dermil ridges are not absolute proof, the whole dermil ridge theory has been proven to be very suspect over the last 2 years by more than one researcher, and Chilcutt has been shown to have made some serious errors in his own research.
Can you post where you read Chilcutt has made mistakes, have never seen anything but him saying the pattern of ridges Leeds him to believe its proof.
I'll try and find it, the last person who gained access to the film at Ms Pattersons
house captured each frame hand feed into through digital scope and then into digital video, then used it to take the shake out of the film in which Patterson was running and unstable. You can see muscle flex in the arms,back,legs.
Chilcutt has been proven wrong more than once, i'll PM you a link. Pattern ridges? They never even started showing up until a few years back, pretty odd unless you consider that hoaxers have been developing a lot more. Dermil ridges can and have been faked, so how is that definitive proof of anything? Thats anti-science and basically a joke. The film that Patricia has isn't even the original, since that went "missing," bit weird.
@GilbertSyndrome I haven't seen any suit til this day that allows definition of
muscular movement from stretching to relax position. If there was a suit and the person wearing it they would have come forward, all the people who claimed to be in the suit couldn't prove jack. Still think this is the best video ever recorded.
Most look like someone in a garage made the suit we see in videos.
What muscle movement? We see some slight movement in the leg but where else? Why don't the glutes work in conjunction with the buttocks as it walks? No biped on earth can walk without such glute movement unless the butt isn't attached to the legs.... so thats a bit of a giveaway right there. Bob Heironimus pretty much proved it all, he had his story corroborated by half of Yakima, he voluntarily took to polys and passed both, why would a liar volunteer to take 2 polys?
@GilbertSyndrome its the one thing that shows its totally fake,,no movement in the glute's at all and there should be..its clearly not attached ,you can see the seam line at the top where the waders bob was wearing i the costume fold under the top half of the suit..
Do you see all the people doing expeditions, not one of them has used sent free
suits, covered their sent and done it the right way. I have bear hunted for 5 years
with sent free and have seen 4 bears without baiting. Something that lives in the woods can detect something that doesn't in a second, and if they see as we see
they could detect object out of place. Until someone does an expedition the right way, no sent, no sound, no talking, their wasting time. Only bigfoot sounds.
How did Roger get his film sent off on a Friday evening and processed in under 24 hours? Its a blatant hoax, Kodachrome took up to 3 days to process in specialized Kodak labs on weekdays.... this film is such a hoax that its ridiculous that it still manages to fool anyone, neither Patterson or Gimlin could ever keep their stories straight, not one ape fossil has ever been found in N.A. does Bigfoot just vanish upon death? This is such a joke of a myth and people are still fooled.
As far as i know, Heironimus is the only man who ever came forward as the Bigfoot, he's the right height and the right build, his story matches up and he was genuinely affiliated with both Patterson and Gimlin. The PGF is basically a visual recreation of the Roe encounter which Patterson was obsessed with and even wrote about in his book which came out before the PGF and even contained a female Bigfoot with breasts....
@odiebugs suit conforming to every muscle group. really show me a biped with glute's like that..its fake padding thats why it doesnt move.and it should..look at the seem line round the middle..
maybe bigfoot used to exist in a small population a long time ago but i doubt it still exists today. If it really did exist dont u think a live specimen or at least a dead one would of popped up by now
seymour, cast grain on any really fake Bigfoot clip out there it'll still look fake, but Patty even drenched in grain does not. Also, watch the AP Bigfoot 1-5 & see why this isn't a hoax but a real unknown creature. Forget Hollywood, this kind of magic they could never perform. Took decades before they even got close with anatomy tricks, flexing muscles convincingly still isn't easy from distance, Bill Munns dares to speak what the little boys don't, even the young f/x guy's impressed by Patty.
That's not so, Seymour. It's a grainy film sure, but put grain on any Hollywood Bigfoot film and we'd still recognize that as a fake... PGF stands the test of time, the more it's cleaned up and the better it looks the clearer does it become that Patty's no suit. There'll always be people who see 'a guy in a suit walking', but that's mostly people with passing interest in it or these casual armchair professors, none can really envision it actual fact. I'm not losing sleep over it.
Nice try mrm, I mean eminbozo... Get over these creatures exist and the PGF is real, all real, no fake. Just happened to be the first known footage, that's all. Deal with it. You can't be a very smart 'f/x guy' falling for rumors and not knowing they didn't have the f/x technology in the mid-60s, basically still working with materials even older than that...
Back in November at Pat Mayse lake, north of Paris, TX back in early 1990's, a couple of friends and myself were camping.
Being November, they had already closed all the showers and so we were literally the only one we saw camping. And no one was ever on the lake itself. We heard something similar to that scream, it freaked us out. A couple of nights before that were had the feeling we were being watched.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
PATTERSON VIDEO COMPLETE FAKE! I have worked in the Hollywood film industry for almost 20 years now...trust me, everyone in the film industry laughs at those standing by the FAKE patterson film, we all know it is a fake..why some of you still argue such nonsense now is simply amazing...100% FAKE. If you look real close you can see the padded "costume" feet on the ape suit. FAKE and laughing at you who think otherwise! HA HA HA! FAKE!
eminaidiot is actually the jerk knowing less than zero about PGF, all dreams and wrong conclusions based on wishful thinking. Mere assumptions, no proof ever the film's fake, in fact so much point to it being real - the fact the f/x industry couldn't have done it then, Patty's too wide for human shoulders to reach the distance to her arms. The arms also bend at the joints, but the bend is not humanly possible as the upper arm bones are too long for a human. Countless points why it's real.
Its not just an american theme, every continent except antartica has reports of a similar creature. im not writing to convince anybody, but its been said " it would be more amazing for people all across the world to all fake the anicent stories and sightings than than it would be for a creature to evade the scientific community. if you can imagine our early ancestors competing / fighting with the "yeti" or gigantopithagus you could imagine the yeti learning avoid people as much as possible.
I can take you to two places to my knowledge where you may have "experiences". One is in Michigan and one is in Ohio. I myself can only attest to the validity of the Michigan experience as I was the witness while deer hunting.
Half of these are fake but i do believe that theres a bigfoot out there otherwise people woldnt be talking about it, or people that said the witness it too..
If these so called bigfoots exist, and people are filming these beasts, why not catch it? I think its all a bunch of crap, these are probably some kind of tribe of people who are very tall and use animals to cover up with.And who knows the "army" may be in on it.
I can't wait to kill and skin my first bigfoot hopefully if i ever find a bigfoot it will be a baby so that it is easier to kill and i can have it mounted...
قد ضأيقنا إنتباه كلّ من أنت أمريكيات حمقاء أنت تعمّر للوقت متأخّرة هكذا الآن كان ذهب أن [كم ينتو] بلدك وفجّرت هو فوققد ضأيقنا إنتباه كلّ من أنت أمريكيات حمقاء أنت تعمّر للوقت متأخّرة هكذا الآن كان ذهب أن [كم ينتو] بلدك وفجّرت هو فوققد ضأيقنا إنتباه كلّ من أنت أمريكيات حمقاء أنت تعمّر للوقت متأخّرة هكذا الآن كان ذهب أن [كم ينتو] بلدك وفجّرت هو فوققد ضأيقنا إنتباه كلّ من أنت أمريكيات حمقاء أنت تعمّر للوقت متأخّرة هكذا الآن كان ذهب أن [كم ينتو] بلدك وفجّرت
video.. quality terrible....weird how videos are always blurry you know who big foot is..some guy who lives in the forest and dresses up as a chimp....
I hope that if these guys really exist , we never find them. Let's just leave them in peace. Mankind needs the element of the unknown in our lives. Not to mention everything Man touches , he ends up destroying. As you know so many uneducated types in America would just shoot one to show off. God help these peaceable critters.
avoid us at all costs! better chance finding lochness. an evolved miniaturized version of species waterdragon. were once real leftover prehistoric creatures that were called "demons" or "satanic creatures"! medeival men killed off the beasts to become heroes but gained NOTHING! killing sasquatch/lochness to prove that it exhists will never happen. they know our ways. they WILL avoid us always. but i know where to find our freind sasquatch. you dont:(
ya now all???......about %98 of the videos shown on youtube of yeti/sasquatch, ARE FAKES!!! have you ever asked yourselves WHY no one has ever been able to find their bones or any solid proof of their existence besides the occaisional "real" videos??? HA!!! they cant hide forever right?? well, they will. they are just physical manifestations of creatures that come out from their worlds and slip into ours for whatever reason and exhist here. ive seen one appear, disappear then re-appear. ;)
How come EVERY video sucks. Shaky, out of focus. You can never accurately freeze frame on any shot. This is all a bunch of shit. Get another hobby. I would pay top dollar for any factual, scientific proof with a credible video of the "BIGFOOT"
ok for ppl that doesnt believe in the patterson film heres something to think on.
when they examined the tape with a high resoultion you see facial struture that a man cant have, you can see muscles ripple through the fur, if a man was in a suit you wouldnt see that. they found tracks and they did a test to see how much it weighed-700lbs.i dont believe all the things i see but we discover animals all the time, it is possible that we havent found it because it is shy and lives in remote areas
i dont believe in any of this stuff ,but i would if concrete evidence came along which i understand there never has been ,i do respect peoples opinions like whatever they believe or not believe ,my opinion evolution comes along and brings new crweatures and takes them away like dinosaurs and such i think stuff like this also did ,do i sound stupid haha
if he showed his brother how to fake it, then why can noone reproduce it? if hes tellin the truth why doesnt he show ppl how to recreate it? he could be lying..
ok i highly doubt they recreated it better, watch monster quest bud, a highly trained athlete couldnt walk the way bigfoot did.
even if they did recreate it today, it wouldnt be that big of a feat for the suit, but that stuff was a long time ago, and to make the muscles ripple...it cant be fake
LOL....you need to quit watching tabloid shows, kid. Go watch 2001: A Space Odyssey, made in 1968. The apes look TEN TIMES better than the ape costume in the Patterson film.
i highly doubt that it looked better in 1968. even if it did it was a movie that had special effects and i doubt patterson had the ability or funds to do something on that level.
dont forget that whne theyt lloked at it in high resolution, they saw a facial structure that NO human can have
so your saying that when you wore the gorilla suit that people could see the layer of muscle out of the suit? i doubt that buddy. you woulld have to weigh 400+ pounds and be ripped like a beast
why would you believe that dude, he could be lying, ill admit that if you can show me a video of someone replicating the video and it looks better than the patterson film that its a fake
Why would you believe Roger Patterson, a well known conman, liar, and hoaxer?
A self admitted hoaxer made this film. His own brother in law has admitted it. We have numerous independent witnesses who saw the costume. What more do you want?
And again, the ape suit in the Patterson film looks fake as hell. Go watch 2001, like I already said.
they could all be lying dude..if i saw the big ape suit that someone said they faked the patterson film with, i would take it or photograph it or do something to prove ive seen it.
Again, as soon as you can show me a recreation that shows someone in a better suit doing exactly what bigfoot was doing in the film from the 60's ill believe.
i saw 2001, hair is to fake, only real looking part is face
all you do is keep saying the same thing. your argument is running out. ive seen 2001 and the only good part is there face, the body is too clean and the fur isnt ruffled.
stop reposting unless you have hard evidence as to it was faked not just "some guy said he saw it!"
ok im tired of fighting with you i believe what i believe.
have you ever lied before? im guessing yes, so therefore you would be a liar and we shouldnt take your word for anything right? thats what we should do to patterson according to you
Patterson lied to EVERYBODY. He ripped off everyone from Safeway to the hospitals that were treating him for cancer. He ran up one of his friend's phone bills to $600 (1967 money!) and an arrest warrant was made for him for not returning his camera. He also had an arrest warrant for assault. The list goes on and on. He was a conman and liar, yet you believe him. End of story.
what is your credentials that gives you any creditability to debunk anything seen in this video? Does anyone who does have ever attempted to prove the patterson video a hoax? (Dr.) Posttoastie?
the answer is no. Where in the patterson video does it show patterson rippin pple off from safeway and so on. why do u keep bringing up something that is obviously overlooked by experts, scientists and biologists alike. The list of irrelevance goes on and on and so does your argument
Posttoastie doesn't know jack about the PGF. I pointed out numerous errors he quoted. Instead of acknowledging them, he banned me instead. This is cult behavior. Example? He said that Bob H. said the suit was made from horsehide. He didn't say that. Bob said his brother Howard toldd him that ROGER claimed that. The video Postoastie has up claims that the BBC tried to recreate the suit. again he was wrong. The BBC was WASN'T trying to recreate it. Your arrogance is showing here.
I have the hoax documentation behind the PGF. Al DeAtley, Roger's brother in law, financed the hoax. He ADMITS the film is bogus. I have pictures of the parts used to build "Patty" in 1967. They came from Hollywood, and not from Morris.
The film was a money scam. It HAS been debunked. The Patty geeks keep claiming that the film "has withstood the test of time" yet NO ONE IS CLAIMING IT IS REAL.
Some of you people wouldn't believe bigfoot was real if it was right in front of you. Looks to me like that this video shows alot of proof. If you don't see it, your blind.
smoothstringsron 4 months ago
Cool vid
technicianfa 5 months ago
Класс! здесь собраны лучшее видео!
Class! Here gather better video!
Monolit47 5 months ago
Bubba...a nice new eminaz account... lol Lots of hunters have seen a Bigfoot, but they haven't shot or killed one because it seemed too human, and in such a situation you bet there's doubt and reluctance to blast away at it... Actually, there may have been the odd kill, but who wants to known as the first official person to kill another human species specimen.
komodoman 6 months ago
There never was a Bigfoot! Ever! It's an old Indian joke! That's it. Over and done. All the photos and videos are blurry! Maybe Bigfoot is blurry and that would make it scarier!
A large blurry monster in the forests!
BubbaBodecker 7 months ago
For the record...every single argument used against the existence of Big Foot was used against the existence of the mountain gorilla.
No bones..No traces in the fossil record...No photos...No remains..hair or otherwise, etc. etc.
Such arguments did not make the mountain gorilla any less real. I also never read any apologies from the people who mocked those who accepted the mountain gorilla as real.
Puck2442 8 months ago
@MiniMimi40
That has got to be the dumbest comment I've ever read on any Youtube site.
No one has run into Bigfoot? What are you stupid? Aren't there a hundred people or more a year reporting running into him?
Puck2442 8 months ago
sorry the rest of evedince i think is rather true but at 2:44 it was proven to be a bear but great work.
LegoTrooper21 9 months ago
Cryptozoology novel about two boys who find something strange on the beach one night see video book trailer
dltanner99 11 months ago
why wont someone hunt down bigfoot
roadofthedeadd 11 months ago
Everything on this vid is fake.
meltz911 1 year ago
patterson nevr ever took a poly so sweaty your talking crap..only bob h has,and passed both.
nastymonsters2 1 year ago
bloke in a suit mate... always was, probably always will be, cheers
gan9e 1 year ago 2
I just hope one day you all see something that you can just not explain with no logical explanation what you saw and you post it on youtube and are played the fool where you werent their to see or even feel the rush runnin through some of these peoples bodies seeing something thats real but how do you explain your truth would you liked to be called a liar when your truth is seen with your own two eyes.. Your out their why cant something else be..
tianaandnickalisuck 1 year ago
@tianaandnickalisuck
Be realistic, have you seen a Bigfoot? If not then why do you assume we're all ignorant for thinking its a stupid idea? There is NO evidence out there, if there is then please go and find some...
GilbertSyndrome 1 year ago
this is obviously fake
sming01 1 year ago
bigfoots are real teddy roosavelt is a pres. and he is along side us few in believing there real but fu if you cant see the so called writting on the wall
gorrilatape 1 year ago
Hey Gilbert, found one person said about Chilcutt, the clown said that the casting process can create lines that appear to be ridges. Chilcutt is a pro, not someone on youtube thinking they are intelligent when they haven't even seen the original, they see the fifteenth copy, then watch a small pix on youtube and all of a sudden their Eisenstein. Back to ridges, lets see the guy make casts of fake prints and show how his theory is correct instead of just flapping his lips.
odiebugs 1 year ago
@odiebugs
Why didn't you press "reply?" Its simple. First of all, what original copy? You haven't seen the original because it was "lost" in 1970...so i'm a bit confused as to what you're talking about. Also, google "chilcutt mistaken" and see for yourself, you haven't even read the article and yet you're damning it? haha, ironic since you claimed i was trying to be an "Einstein." Show me ONE paper written by Chillcut... there is none, why? Because he's talking rubbish.
GilbertSyndrome 1 year ago
@odiebugs
Chillcut has twice given his seal of approval to already established fakes.... even Dahinden had to laugh when Chillcut was amazed my a Freeman fake which Dahinden regarded as "100%" fake, what an embarrassing fail for a supposed expert. An expert who's yet to write even one paper on his findings. Regarding the PGF, there is NO original copy and i guarantee i know more about this film than you or Chillcut, its a fake and if you can't see that then you're blind.
GilbertSyndrome 1 year ago
@odiebugs
Here's a challenge for you, find me one article relating to a footcast found pre-1960 that has dermil ridges.
GilbertSyndrome 1 year ago
@GilbertSyndrome
Here's challenge for you, move your ass out of home and spend week in forests of Washington or swamps of florida.I m sure u would run away after one night.But offcourse you wont do that because u are just internet troll. 25% of US is untouched by human foot and there are even more remoat areas in canada.
PGF is 100% real. Watch planet of ape from 68 I mean in those days even hollywod was not able to make suit like that so how in the hell 2 cowboys could do it! Open your mind
Swiati 1 year ago
@Swiati
Here's a challenge for you, grow up. You're asking me to spend some time out in the forest looking for a giant ape-man? Are you high? Why should i be scared? Show me one incident where a sasquatch harmed a human rather than a human scaring away a sasquatch, haha. I work with response here in UK, i risk being stabbed to death in deprived areas every day, kids here carry sawn-off shotguns daily, google search "Croxteth and Norris Green" and then you tell me i'm scared of Bigfoot, idiot
GilbertSyndrome 1 year ago
@Swiati
PGF is 100% real? Really? Is that why Roger Patterson drew a picture of a female Bigfoot with breasts in his book "Abominable Snowmen of America" based on the William Roe encounter, is that also why he intended to make a movie based on the same idea but ran out of funding? The same movie was later re'made by ANE (a company Roger worked for as a "wildlife photographer") and was later re'named "Sasquatch: the Legend of Bigfoot." Open your eyes mate, its a hoax.
GilbertSyndrome 1 year ago
I dont ask u to tell me your life story about plastic shout guns and deprive areas so stop wasting my time with stuff that i dont care. P just drew what william roe saw so what is your point?If it looks like creature from movie that convince me even more that those encounters are similar.He wanted to make a movie cause he was interest in this subject -this proves nothing.U want to convince me by discredit patty?.TIll now movie is way more convincing than your trash talk
Swiati 1 year ago
@Swiati
Haha, plastic shotguns, kid, seriously. Duh, well you don't find it odd that Patterson writes a book about Bigfoot, draws a female Bigfoot a lot like Patty based on the story he was obsessed with from Roe, then he intends to make a movie based on it, runs out of money and then magically shoots a "real" film of a female Bigfoot? What does Patty look like really? Get real, we see it from one angle, for 30 seconds on a grainy film from 40 yards away... pffft, my trash talk, are you 13?
GilbertSyndrome 1 year ago
@GilbertSyndrome
haha maybe u want HD 3D footage from every angle from 60's of creature that is so allusive that with all our knowlage we cant even find it?! .This 30s is psychical prove of bf existence ,its much more veritable than empty trashtalk of bob h.Every 1 can say."HEY IT WAS ME IN THE SUIT"
.Show me facts ABOUT ACTUAL FOOTAGE that proves to u that this is a hoax ,what looks fake to you, what proves to you that this movie is fake beside stories of ppl that wasnt even there.
Swiati 1 year ago
@Swiati
No, but how can you say we've seen nothing like this when all we see is a blurry, one angled shot of a Bigfoot from 30 yards away? If you saw Chewbacca under the same set of circumstances it might also seem real, use your brain. This footage is physical proof? No, DNA, bones and scat are physical proof, where you born yesterday? Bob H. passed 2 lie detector tests, did Roger or Gimlin? No, they refused to take one. You also avoided what i said about the impossible processing... why?
GilbertSyndrome 1 year ago
@GilbertSyndrome
I watched hundred of movies most of them where fakes and non of them showed as many details as pgf movie and it was made 40 years ago!Footage is good enough to see muscle movment,creature has right hight,they even took foot prints cast,everything in movie proves that this is real.U wanna prove that its fake dont tell me those stupid stories that canot be proven,show me suit, made with 60's technolgy that will show all pg creature characteristic like muscle movement under hair.
Swiati 1 year ago
@Swiati
What muscle movement?!! The biggest and most flexible muscle that should be moving here is staying completely still - the butt.... why does the butt just remain still and look like a huge diaper? You can even see at the top of the thigh, it looks like a huge pair of underpants, its a joke, haha. Look at the ass cheeks, they don't move, when we walk...our ass moves in conjunction with our legs, its biology, show me where you see that here.
GilbertSyndrome 1 year ago
@Swiati
So what i said can't be proven? Okay:
"The process is complex and exacting, requiring technicians with extensive chemistry training, as well as large, difficult-to-operate machinery. This effectively precludes amateurs or small laboratories from processing Kodachrome. Development took anything from 2-3 working days and was most notably completed during the working week as most Kodak labs closed on weekends." - From (a History of Kodachrome) so was Roger a Magician? haha, Jesus
GilbertSyndrome 1 year ago
@Swiati
I showed you a fact and you ignored it.... Roger said he sent the film off on Friday evening... (NO MAIL WAS DELIVERED TO OR FROM EUREKA ON WEEKENDS) and said he had it processed in Seatlle on Saturday and ready to view at DeAtleys on Sunday. No he never... why? (BECAUSE KODACHROME TOOK UP TO 3 DAYS TO PROCESS) Go and google search anything about Kodachrome development in the 60's.... Roger got caught lying again, he actually filmed this in early September, just as Bob H. said.
GilbertSyndrome 1 year ago
@GilbertSyndrome
Polygraph proves nothing its not even veritable enough to be used as prove in court and btw patterson passed polygraph test for wild life magazine.Until u wont show me suit with muscle movement that was made using technology available in 60's u can shut up and stop wasting my time with your stories about patti cause that proves nothing!Movie is real prove.Its funny how u believe in bobby stories ,some red neck that has no proves,no costume and even not enough hight.
Swiati 1 year ago
@Swiati
My God, are you stupid? The point is that Bob H. VOLUNTEERED to take a poly, why the hell would he volunteer if he was a liar? He passed.... then he VOLUNTEERED to take another, why? He was given the test by the worlds leading specialist and he passed again on LIVE TV! He passed twice, on two seperate occassions, and he's a liar? Are you that desperate to believe in Sasquatch? Not enough height? Bob was 6'4"... Patty was 6'5".... even Roger and Gimlin said Patty was 6'5",
GilbertSyndrome 1 year ago
@Swiati
John Green, John Napier, Jim Mclarin, Grover Krantz, Roger Patterson and Bob Gimlin ALL SAID that the Bigfoot was about "6 and a half feet..." Bob H was the RIGHT SIZE! Do you know anything about this at all?
GilbertSyndrome 1 year ago
@Swiati
Haha, Roger NEVER passed a poly, the magazine you're referring to was one that he worked for, haha, he was the wildlife photographer/filmmaker for ANE, the same company that later re'made the movie Roger was going to make about Bigfoot, and he NEVER took a poly, seriously, do you enjoy being made to look like an idiot?
GilbertSyndrome 1 year ago
@GilbertSyndrome
U post shit that proves nothing i told u show me suit with muscle movment like that ,that will only convince me, until u dont do that u can just shut up.Discovery channel found exact spot where movie was taken and they measure creature hight to be 7.6 foot tall.I said that polygraph its not an evidence and u still say shit that is,Maybe your mom smoke to much when she was pragnet cause U are too stupid for discussion rly check out your head cause u have some brain demage.
Swiati 1 year ago
@Swiati
Haha, kid, you FAILED! I proved that Roger NEVER had this film processed in one day, it was impossible, what do you have to say about that? You still haven't talked about the big underpants that the Bigfoot seems to be wearing, or the fact that the butt DOESN'T MOVE AT ALL. 7 foot tall? Are you fucking high?
"Well when the creature walked around the creek, it sorta stood up tall, it must have been around 6 feet tall, i'd say even as big as six and a half feet." - Roger Patterson.
GilbertSyndrome 1 year ago
@Swiati
So Roger and Gimlin where THERE WHEN IT HAPPENED and they said it was 6 and a half feet tall, and you're saying it was 7 foot six inches? Hahaha, kid, are you 12?
GilbertSyndrome 1 year ago
@GilbertSyndrome
I see u dont know a lot about math so i will explain it to u more clearly , when u have all the data , distance camera frame,etc, u can actually calculate true hight of subject. And they calculate patterson big foot to be at least 7.6 feet tall.---> /watch?v=FdEGrnsYJWY&feature=related 3:00
U didnt know about patty polygraph so again here u are:
/watch?v=85brXp6r3S8&feature=related
11:00 check out , Patterson passed polygraph test for wild life magazine.
Swiati 1 year ago
@Swiati
Haha, math? Well basically your whole fucking experiment is severely flawed unless you know the distance between the subject and the camera... and since even Bill Munns came out last year and said that none of these details were known its still all guesstimation, so you're pretty wrong. Munns also said that all height and weight measurements were uncertain, go check out the JREF forums, Bill Munns has been posting there for a few years, its all there in his own words.
GilbertSyndrome 1 year ago
@Swiati
Like i said, Patterson, Gimlin, Krantz, Green, Dahinden and Mclarin all gave a height of "six and one half feet.." You're truly gullible aren't you? There is NO record of any Patterson polygraph, the supposed story was published in the magazine that Patterson worked for, by his own FRIEND! haha, Heironimus took 2 on national television, both were recorded and the results are available on the internet, they were conducted by the worlds leading polygrapher. Any more errors to show?
GilbertSyndrome 1 year ago
@Swiati utter bollocks...6ft 5,,,and a man in a suit..
nastymonsters2 1 year ago
@Swiati
Haha, kid, this proves i know nothing? Seriously... okay, lets see how much you know, tell me how Roger got his Kodachrome processed in 24 hours and where he had it done.
GilbertSyndrome 1 year ago
Notice how every single piece of footage is blurred, or shaky, or grainy, or some combination of the three, and always at a considerable distance? That's because if it was clear and up close, it would be laughingly obvious that these are nothing more than gorilla suits, like cheap leftovers from the 50's sci-fi dud "Robot Monster." LOL, people are so gullible, it's pathetic.
beerbrain420 1 year ago
OMG CHEWBACCA IS REAL!!! =O
dffdcdesacds 1 year ago
After seeing the original film from Ms Patterson taken frame by frame with a digital microscope, its the best view of a real bigfoot ever. There is Zero chance barley now then alone 40 tears ago of a suit conforming to every muscle group. Freeman-fake. Wild creek-pathetic. Three toes- pathetic. There are a few, like 10 prints maybe, that were cast from a mud area that showed dermal ridges, absolute proof they were real, and absolute proof there is a bigfoot.
odiebugs 1 year ago
@odiebugs
Zero chance? How can you tell? We see the Patterson Bigfoot from a distance of 30 yards, on a grainy camera, from one angle and for about 25 seconds, if we saw Chewbacca under the same circumstances he may also look very real. Dermil ridges are not absolute proof, the whole dermil ridge theory has been proven to be very suspect over the last 2 years by more than one researcher, and Chilcutt has been shown to have made some serious errors in his own research.
GilbertSyndrome 1 year ago
@GilbertSyndrome
Can you post where you read Chilcutt has made mistakes, have never seen anything but him saying the pattern of ridges Leeds him to believe its proof.
I'll try and find it, the last person who gained access to the film at Ms Pattersons
house captured each frame hand feed into through digital scope and then into digital video, then used it to take the shake out of the film in which Patterson was running and unstable. You can see muscle flex in the arms,back,legs.
odiebugs 1 year ago
@odiebugs
Chilcutt has been proven wrong more than once, i'll PM you a link. Pattern ridges? They never even started showing up until a few years back, pretty odd unless you consider that hoaxers have been developing a lot more. Dermil ridges can and have been faked, so how is that definitive proof of anything? Thats anti-science and basically a joke. The film that Patricia has isn't even the original, since that went "missing," bit weird.
GilbertSyndrome 1 year ago
@GilbertSyndrome I haven't seen any suit til this day that allows definition of
muscular movement from stretching to relax position. If there was a suit and the person wearing it they would have come forward, all the people who claimed to be in the suit couldn't prove jack. Still think this is the best video ever recorded.
Most look like someone in a garage made the suit we see in videos.
odiebugs 1 year ago
@odiebugs
What muscle movement? We see some slight movement in the leg but where else? Why don't the glutes work in conjunction with the buttocks as it walks? No biped on earth can walk without such glute movement unless the butt isn't attached to the legs.... so thats a bit of a giveaway right there. Bob Heironimus pretty much proved it all, he had his story corroborated by half of Yakima, he voluntarily took to polys and passed both, why would a liar volunteer to take 2 polys?
GilbertSyndrome 1 year ago
@GilbertSyndrome its the one thing that shows its totally fake,,no movement in the glute's at all and there should be..its clearly not attached ,you can see the seam line at the top where the waders bob was wearing i the costume fold under the top half of the suit..
thedemonunderyourbed 1 year ago
Do you see all the people doing expeditions, not one of them has used sent free
suits, covered their sent and done it the right way. I have bear hunted for 5 years
with sent free and have seen 4 bears without baiting. Something that lives in the woods can detect something that doesn't in a second, and if they see as we see
they could detect object out of place. Until someone does an expedition the right way, no sent, no sound, no talking, their wasting time. Only bigfoot sounds.
odiebugs 1 year ago
@odiebugs
How did Roger get his film sent off on a Friday evening and processed in under 24 hours? Its a blatant hoax, Kodachrome took up to 3 days to process in specialized Kodak labs on weekdays.... this film is such a hoax that its ridiculous that it still manages to fool anyone, neither Patterson or Gimlin could ever keep their stories straight, not one ape fossil has ever been found in N.A. does Bigfoot just vanish upon death? This is such a joke of a myth and people are still fooled.
GilbertSyndrome 1 year ago
@odiebugs
As far as i know, Heironimus is the only man who ever came forward as the Bigfoot, he's the right height and the right build, his story matches up and he was genuinely affiliated with both Patterson and Gimlin. The PGF is basically a visual recreation of the Roe encounter which Patterson was obsessed with and even wrote about in his book which came out before the PGF and even contained a female Bigfoot with breasts....
GilbertSyndrome 1 year ago
@odiebugs suit conforming to every muscle group. really show me a biped with glute's like that..its fake padding thats why it doesnt move.and it should..look at the seem line round the middle..
thedemonunderyourbed 1 year ago
just had to have the screaming at the end...
stoagy 1 year ago
great compilation of the most authentic, definitely not faked, video & audio out there. well done.
fbweaver 1 year ago
apparently bigfoot only walks from left to right, never towards or away from anyone
PhillySuBLMinal 1 year ago
Song sounds like the metal gear solid theme.
FandangoProud 1 year ago
The 911 call freaked me out. I can't imagine a creature like bigfoot looking me in the eye.
drewkeener 1 year ago
@drewkeener Same here. When she asked "What's he doing?" And he said "He's looking at ME." A chill ran up my spine.
FandangoProud 1 year ago
I belive that it is highly possible that BigFoot exists and we should not denie that he does until we have actual proof
PissedAvengingAngel 1 year ago
I think if we do discover Bigfoot does exist we will find that they fit the evolutionary chain and us humans do not.
Skull666Bones 1 year ago
maybe bigfoot used to exist in a small population a long time ago but i doubt it still exists today. If it really did exist dont u think a live specimen or at least a dead one would of popped up by now
j23526 1 year ago
wat the crap do any of this people don't shake while recording can't see crap when u see it or even a tripod. wat the fuck!!!!
kjwhite2014 1 year ago
seymour, cast grain on any really fake Bigfoot clip out there it'll still look fake, but Patty even drenched in grain does not. Also, watch the AP Bigfoot 1-5 & see why this isn't a hoax but a real unknown creature. Forget Hollywood, this kind of magic they could never perform. Took decades before they even got close with anatomy tricks, flexing muscles convincingly still isn't easy from distance, Bill Munns dares to speak what the little boys don't, even the young f/x guy's impressed by Patty.
komodoman 1 year ago
That's not so, Seymour. It's a grainy film sure, but put grain on any Hollywood Bigfoot film and we'd still recognize that as a fake... PGF stands the test of time, the more it's cleaned up and the better it looks the clearer does it become that Patty's no suit. There'll always be people who see 'a guy in a suit walking', but that's mostly people with passing interest in it or these casual armchair professors, none can really envision it actual fact. I'm not losing sleep over it.
komodoman 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nice try mrm, I mean eminbozo... Get over these creatures exist and the PGF is real, all real, no fake. Just happened to be the first known footage, that's all. Deal with it. You can't be a very smart 'f/x guy' falling for rumors and not knowing they didn't have the f/x technology in the mid-60s, basically still working with materials even older than that...
komodoman 1 year ago
Comment removed
komodoman 1 year ago
cont.
On those nights we never had any type of wildlife around the camp.
We headed out of there the next day.
We were just too isolated if we needed help.
longsexylegs 2 years ago
Back in November at Pat Mayse lake, north of Paris, TX back in early 1990's, a couple of friends and myself were camping.
Being November, they had already closed all the showers and so we were literally the only one we saw camping. And no one was ever on the lake itself. We heard something similar to that scream, it freaked us out. A couple of nights before that were had the feeling we were being watched.
longsexylegs 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
PATTERSON VIDEO COMPLETE FAKE! I have worked in the Hollywood film industry for almost 20 years now...trust me, everyone in the film industry laughs at those standing by the FAKE patterson film, we all know it is a fake..why some of you still argue such nonsense now is simply amazing...100% FAKE. If you look real close you can see the padded "costume" feet on the ape suit. FAKE and laughing at you who think otherwise! HA HA HA! FAKE!
mrmrsright 2 years ago
mt. rainier. three rangers watched one like on the ridge in this video---2001
riderlifer 2 years ago
eminaidiot is actually the jerk knowing less than zero about PGF, all dreams and wrong conclusions based on wishful thinking. Mere assumptions, no proof ever the film's fake, in fact so much point to it being real - the fact the f/x industry couldn't have done it then, Patty's too wide for human shoulders to reach the distance to her arms. The arms also bend at the joints, but the bend is not humanly possible as the upper arm bones are too long for a human. Countless points why it's real.
komodoman 2 years ago
@komodoman is right,there is WAY more detailed and more convincing proof that bigfoot is real rather than being fake!
MrApplewoodcoyote 1 year ago 14
@MrApplewoodcoyote Not really..
meltz911 1 year ago
Its not just an american theme, every continent except antartica has reports of a similar creature. im not writing to convince anybody, but its been said " it would be more amazing for people all across the world to all fake the anicent stories and sightings than than it would be for a creature to evade the scientific community. if you can imagine our early ancestors competing / fighting with the "yeti" or gigantopithagus you could imagine the yeti learning avoid people as much as possible.
seannyboy85 2 years ago
you would shit yourself hearing that scream in the middle of a forest. worse if it was at night.
they appear to be big fuckers! i wudnt wanna be in thw way of 1 of those things
Mikemetalman 2 years ago 2
I can take you to two places to my knowledge where you may have "experiences". One is in Michigan and one is in Ohio. I myself can only attest to the validity of the Michigan experience as I was the witness while deer hunting.
liabatud67 2 years ago
Half of these are fake but i do believe that theres a bigfoot out there otherwise people woldnt be talking about it, or people that said the witness it too..
wuckit 3 years ago
lol what is he doing in ur back yard sir hes looking at me
tHeViDzS 3 years ago
40 lol actual big feet lolz
tHeViDzS 3 years ago
cool video nice sound effects 2 the end
maurogoldu 3 years ago
If these so called bigfoots exist, and people are filming these beasts, why not catch it? I think its all a bunch of crap, these are probably some kind of tribe of people who are very tall and use animals to cover up with.And who knows the "army" may be in on it.
gohojawa 3 years ago
I can't wait to kill and skin my first bigfoot hopefully if i ever find a bigfoot it will be a baby so that it is easier to kill and i can have it mounted...
tko1979 3 years ago
قد ضأيقنا إنتباه كلّ من أنت أمريكيات حمقاء أنت تعمّر للوقت متأخّرة هكذا الآن كان ذهب أن [كم ينتو] بلدك وفجّرت هو فوققد ضأيقنا إنتباه كلّ من أنت أمريكيات حمقاء أنت تعمّر للوقت متأخّرة هكذا الآن كان ذهب أن [كم ينتو] بلدك وفجّرت هو فوققد ضأيقنا إنتباه كلّ من أنت أمريكيات حمقاء أنت تعمّر للوقت متأخّرة هكذا الآن كان ذهب أن [كم ينتو] بلدك وفجّرت هو فوققد ضأيقنا إنتباه كلّ من أنت أمريكيات حمقاء أنت تعمّر للوقت متأخّرة هكذا الآن كان ذهب أن [كم ينتو] بلدك وفجّرت
WileECoyote383 3 years ago
Half of these are fake!
KB8LA 3 years ago
video.. quality terrible....weird how videos are always blurry you know who big foot is..some guy who lives in the forest and dresses up as a chimp....
chalatenango234 3 years ago
that sound at the end was creepy
newburghzchamp 3 years ago
@newburghzchamp I've heard that sound before. That sequence was borrowed from that docu-movie,BIGFOOT: MAN OR BEAST.
kokujin1014 1 year ago
Good mixture of different clips well done 5*
Quandary121 3 years ago
I hope that if these guys really exist , we never find them. Let's just leave them in peace. Mankind needs the element of the unknown in our lives. Not to mention everything Man touches , he ends up destroying. As you know so many uneducated types in America would just shoot one to show off. God help these peaceable critters.
MasterMark123 3 years ago 2
its just me.
xmobster5 3 years ago
they dont want to hurt us, that is evident.
avoid us at all costs! better chance finding lochness. an evolved miniaturized version of species waterdragon. were once real leftover prehistoric creatures that were called "demons" or "satanic creatures"! medeival men killed off the beasts to become heroes but gained NOTHING! killing sasquatch/lochness to prove that it exhists will never happen. they know our ways. they WILL avoid us always. but i know where to find our freind sasquatch. you dont:(
bikr1975 3 years ago
ya now all???......about %98 of the videos shown on youtube of yeti/sasquatch, ARE FAKES!!! have you ever asked yourselves WHY no one has ever been able to find their bones or any solid proof of their existence besides the occaisional "real" videos??? HA!!! they cant hide forever right?? well, they will. they are just physical manifestations of creatures that come out from their worlds and slip into ours for whatever reason and exhist here. ive seen one appear, disappear then re-appear. ;)
bikr1975 3 years ago
damn , at the end, if i would hear sometin' like that in the woods, i would pee and poooo in my pants en run away!
nubunator2 3 years ago
How come EVERY video sucks. Shaky, out of focus. You can never accurately freeze frame on any shot. This is all a bunch of shit. Get another hobby. I would pay top dollar for any factual, scientific proof with a credible video of the "BIGFOOT"
Happy hunting you fucking idiots.
Give it a rest.
theobviouscritic 3 years ago
the same shit is going on with ghost
so much evidence just still people dont believe
for one thing i believe in ghost for the fact I've seen one with my own eyes
bigfoot never seen for real just pics and video tapes not gonna believe till i see with my eyes
ariseofdarkness33 3 years ago
that is real look at the muscle if it was a costume it would be thinner
momocdg 3 years ago
lol ever seen the movie fantastic four
the thing was actually a costume tat the actor had to where and it weighed like 500lbs
(ok i exaggerated a little bit there)
ariseofdarkness33 3 years ago
wow man holy shit this is real how the hell did u get your hands on this footage ?
pisssss123 3 years ago
REAL!!!!!
GregandNancyW 3 years ago
ok for ppl that doesnt believe in the patterson film heres something to think on.
when they examined the tape with a high resoultion you see facial struture that a man cant have, you can see muscles ripple through the fur, if a man was in a suit you wouldnt see that. they found tracks and they did a test to see how much it weighed-700lbs.i dont believe all the things i see but we discover animals all the time, it is possible that we havent found it because it is shy and lives in remote areas
Jaediz17 3 years ago
still don't believe
ariseofdarkness33 3 years ago
if you dont believe in hard evidence you must be pretty dense
Jaediz17 3 years ago
how did they "fake" the breasts.. Why don't these people ever bring up the bouncing breasts..
Its too bad that people take the simplists explanation and cut off any other possible angles..
I wouldn't say you can prove it is real,but you sure can't prove it is fake...
There are many books out there you can read..
Why has BF been reported since man came to America..
Thats right,the natives made it up to make money and scare people..
Do reasearch,then post yer arguments,don't just say "liar"
bkraven191 2 years ago 8
@bkraven191 You can fake ANYTHIING.
meltz911 1 year ago
wooooooaaaaaaaahhhhhhhh!!!!!!
creechick7 3 years ago
i dont believe in any of this stuff ,but i would if concrete evidence came along which i understand there never has been ,i do respect peoples opinions like whatever they believe or not believe ,my opinion evolution comes along and brings new crweatures and takes them away like dinosaurs and such i think stuff like this also did ,do i sound stupid haha
pont123456789 3 years ago
come on get a life! i dont believe in bigfoot and i'd like to keep it that way. PATTERSON FILM IS FAKE
obiwankenalbie 3 years ago
You don't believe in Bigfoot and you'd like to keep it that way? What does that even mean???
joeyvader 3 years ago
It means if they figure out that bigfoot is real, said person will wet themselves and never go outside again.
fellbladepickle 3 years ago
Amen.
Patterson was a well known conman and hoaxer. His own brother in law, Bruce Mondor, said that Patterson showed him how he faked bigfoot tracks.
That won't convince the Patty lovers, however.
They suffer from "True Believer Syndrome."
eminboztepe 3 years ago
if he showed his brother how to fake it, then why can noone reproduce it? if hes tellin the truth why doesnt he show ppl how to recreate it? he could be lying..
Jaediz17 3 years ago
"noone?"
Is that a word?
This HAS been reproduced.....many times, only better. Watch the movie 2001 if you want to see some better looking ape suits. Or Greystroke.
The ape costume in this film looks too fake.
eminboztepe 3 years ago
ok i highly doubt they recreated it better, watch monster quest bud, a highly trained athlete couldnt walk the way bigfoot did.
even if they did recreate it today, it wouldnt be that big of a feat for the suit, but that stuff was a long time ago, and to make the muscles ripple...it cant be fake
Jaediz17 3 years ago
"Monster Quest?"
LOL....you need to quit watching tabloid shows, kid. Go watch 2001: A Space Odyssey, made in 1968. The apes look TEN TIMES better than the ape costume in the Patterson film.
eminboztepe 3 years ago
i highly doubt that it looked better in 1968. even if it did it was a movie that had special effects and i doubt patterson had the ability or funds to do something on that level.
dont forget that whne theyt lloked at it in high resolution, they saw a facial structure that NO human can have
Jaediz17 3 years ago
How can you say that when you haven't even seen the movie? It was so good that people that they were REAL apes!
And you are wrong about the high resolution bit....it is simply impossible to make these declarations since the subject is too far away and fuzzy.
I find it odd that it doesn't bother you that Patterson was a conman.
Again, do the math.
A conman made this film.
Need I say more?
eminboztepe 3 years ago
dude watch monster quest, it shows the high resolution bit.
Jaediz17 3 years ago
Again, "Monster Quest" is a tabloid show. It doesn't have any credibility.
eminboztepe 3 years ago
As far as the muslces ripple.....uh, well, my muscles rippled too when I wore a gorilla outfit for Halloween one year. It's nothing special.
Don't forget that Patterson was a well known conman, liar, and hoaxer.
Do the math, it's fake.
eminboztepe 3 years ago
so your saying that when you wore the gorilla suit that people could see the layer of muscle out of the suit? i doubt that buddy. you woulld have to weigh 400+ pounds and be ripped like a beast
Jaediz17 3 years ago
Uh....no, you don't have to be.
All you need is a tight fitting ape suit.
This isn't rocket science.
eminboztepe 3 years ago
watch the tape, does that look tight fitting? no
Jaediz17 3 years ago
It was very tight fitting.
How do I know? Because the man who wore the costume, Bob Heironimus, said it was very tight fitting.
He also said the head piece stunk.
eminboztepe 3 years ago
why would you believe that dude, he could be lying, ill admit that if you can show me a video of someone replicating the video and it looks better than the patterson film that its a fake
Jaediz17 3 years ago
Why would you believe Roger Patterson, a well known conman, liar, and hoaxer?
A self admitted hoaxer made this film. His own brother in law has admitted it. We have numerous independent witnesses who saw the costume. What more do you want?
And again, the ape suit in the Patterson film looks fake as hell. Go watch 2001, like I already said.
eminboztepe 3 years ago
where is the suit then?
is 2001 on youtube?
Jaediz17 3 years ago
Where is the suit? Are you being serious? You do know that this was made 40 years ago, right?
You asking me where the suit is is like me asking you where the cut-outs are for the Cottingley Fairy Photographs!
eminboztepe 3 years ago
dude, if people saw the suit and everything where is it? why didnt they photograph it or take it?
Jaediz17 3 years ago
Uh...why would they photograph it? Seriously, you are asking juvenile questions here. Hell, even one of the neighbors tried the head piece on!
You are calling all of these independent witnesses liars and taking the word of a well known conman, liar, and hoaxer instead!
That's doesn't make sense to me.
eminboztepe 3 years ago
they could all be lying dude..if i saw the big ape suit that someone said they faked the patterson film with, i would take it or photograph it or do something to prove ive seen it.
Again, as soon as you can show me a recreation that shows someone in a better suit doing exactly what bigfoot was doing in the film from the 60's ill believe.
i saw 2001, hair is to fake, only real looking part is face
Jaediz17 3 years ago
Again...
Patterson was a known liar, conman, and hoaxer. You are believing him over everyone else? LOL....okaaaaaaayyyy....
The costume in the Patterson film looks fake. 2001 blows it away. So does Planet of the Apes and ones I have seen in movies from decades past.
eminboztepe 3 years ago
all you do is keep saying the same thing. your argument is running out. ive seen 2001 and the only good part is there face, the body is too clean and the fur isnt ruffled.
stop reposting unless you have hard evidence as to it was faked not just "some guy said he saw it!"
Jaediz17 3 years ago
I keep saying the same thing because you CAN'T refute my argument...or at least you haven't yet.
Again, you are taking the word of an admitted liar, conman, and hoaxer. Need I say more?
eminboztepe 3 years ago
ive refuted it many times answer my questions from above or stop posting, show me some HARD EVIDENCE
Jaediz17 3 years ago
You haven't refuted anything, that's the problem.
Your "rebuttals" have been weak at best.
Again, Roger Patterson was a well known conman. You believe a conman? I feel sorry for you....
eminboztepe 3 years ago
ok im tired of fighting with you i believe what i believe.
have you ever lied before? im guessing yes, so therefore you would be a liar and we shouldnt take your word for anything right? thats what we should do to patterson according to you
Jaediz17 3 years ago
No. Again you are not listening.
Patterson lied to EVERYBODY. He ripped off everyone from Safeway to the hospitals that were treating him for cancer. He ran up one of his friend's phone bills to $600 (1967 money!) and an arrest warrant was made for him for not returning his camera. He also had an arrest warrant for assault. The list goes on and on. He was a conman and liar, yet you believe him. End of story.
eminboztepe 3 years ago
what is your credentials that gives you any creditability to debunk anything seen in this video? Does anyone who does have ever attempted to prove the patterson video a hoax? (Dr.) Posttoastie?
the answer is no. Where in the patterson video does it show patterson rippin pple off from safeway and so on. why do u keep bringing up something that is obviously overlooked by experts, scientists and biologists alike. The list of irrelevance goes on and on and so does your argument
jbsuo 2 years ago
Posttoastie doesn't know jack about the PGF. I pointed out numerous errors he quoted. Instead of acknowledging them, he banned me instead. This is cult behavior. Example? He said that Bob H. said the suit was made from horsehide. He didn't say that. Bob said his brother Howard toldd him that ROGER claimed that. The video Postoastie has up claims that the BBC tried to recreate the suit. again he was wrong. The BBC was WASN'T trying to recreate it. Your arrogance is showing here.
eminboztepe 2 years ago
I have the hoax documentation behind the PGF. Al DeAtley, Roger's brother in law, financed the hoax. He ADMITS the film is bogus. I have pictures of the parts used to build "Patty" in 1967. They came from Hollywood, and not from Morris.
The film was a money scam. It HAS been debunked. The Patty geeks keep claiming that the film "has withstood the test of time" yet NO ONE IS CLAIMING IT IS REAL.
eminboztepe 2 years ago
One other thing.
Do a search here on youtube for "quick look at the patterson bigfoot" and then tell me that the ape costume in the film still impresses you.
The video will open your eyes a bit.
eminboztepe 3 years ago
check out
Patterson film a hoax?
by PostToastie
Jaediz17 3 years ago
Already have.
It isn't anything I haven't seen before.
eminboztepe 3 years ago
i for one agree with u
im not gonna believe until i see this so called bigfoot with my own eyes video, recording, pics cant be trusted anymore
ariseofdarkness33 3 years ago
Like the choice of music. Good movie also. One of Denzel Washington's and Gene Hackman's best. Thanks Anixor.
kardiackid75 4 years ago 2
Yes, you're right, bedding or nest as some call it. The music is "Crimson Tide" by Hans Zimmer... Anixor
anixor 4 years ago
ps.. nice music, what is that? .. thanks
SpinachVillage000 4 years ago
cool,.... what is that compost type pile? ... like part of a bedding site?
SpinachVillage000 4 years ago