Nephilimfree's Morphology: The Final Nail in the Coffin

[rottencranberry]

Someone is smelling the paint once more...

[TheLiberalSoup]

I? You?.... Why do you have both pro evolution and anti-evolution videos? Im so confused.

[owchywawa]

@TheLiberalSoup Because both sides are wrong sometimes and both sides have their crazies. Really, you can see my videos as in one of two categories: (1) Debunking factual inaccuracies and (2) playing devil's advocate (sort of).

[hugesinker]

Guess what, the damsel fly and the dragon fly are different 'kinds'!! Hahahah!! Neph TV is right about one thing. It does indeed contain "Laughs and more!"

[grits011]

Pretty good nephy pwnage. While the form and structure definition is technically correct, he twists the definition to suggest different kinds of dogs aren't examples of morphological change when they clearly are. Then when you give an example of morphological change with the dragonfly/damselfly, suddenly they aren't related at all. He just draws an arbitrary line and says, 'This is different morphology, but they're not related!'

[finchfrance]

Just saw Dumb-dumb's "debunking" video of yours. Of course he didn't put a link to it, so it took me a while to find it. Good job, it's easy to see you successfully made a monkey out of him because you forced him to stop drinking long enough to make a video response, albeit it took him 3 months.

Thumbs up and playlisted.

[Wulfshade]

Nephilimfree is a narcist. He wants fans, admirers, worshippers. He even claims to be a prophet of God.

I don't think he's even intertested in the truth.

[pilgrimpater]

Looks like you are seriously undersubbed, so you got mine.

[pilgrimpater]

According to Neph's definition then a cat is morphologically the same as a dog.

[acdobens]

Excellent job. Enjoy my subscription.

[adrenacrumb]

This is good work.

[hugesinker]

Are you going to enter this vid as a scientific pwnage? Also, what is the + sign in the tree you showed? Does that mean extinction?

[owchywawa]

@hugesinker Yeah, I already made it a video response, but youtube changed everything again, so it doesn't show. :\

And yeah the † sign means extinction. I actually didn't make the chart though. It comes from the last link in the description.

[LithodidMan]

Very good treatment of the subject!

[Terrencje]

Nice video, I'm always curious with what you will come up with in the next video. You are almost a kind of your own on this subject. You provided some excellent examples. I don't think nephilimfree will ever accept these, he would say 'those are still wings and those are still eyes, he didn't grew another wing out of a leg' or something like that. Still many other people will learn from this so it is worth debunking him.

[owchywawa]

@Terrencje Yeah, I have some more open minded creationists subscribed to me and others will find this video, so that's more my target audience than Nephilimfree lol.

[UtherPendragan]

Change over time would indicate a creator. Lack of change over time would tend to indicate lack of intelligent design. The earth is not static and unchanging therefore the creator of the earth and all life on it would have designed it to continue, instead of being wiped out at the first ice age or flood that came about. It is interesting how some forms change faster than others. The shark is still the same creature after millions of years yet dogs and horses seem to be on the fast track.

[MrJmm999]

@UtherPendragan Nice. I like how NOW you creationists accept change over time..but claim it is ONLY evidence of a creator.  The intellectual dishonesty never ceases to amaze me.

You guys deny every single scientific proof of evolution..then..when faced with the mountain of evidence in front of you...you simply change your tune and say.."see how smart god is.".

[UtherPendragan]

@MrJmm999 intellectual dishonesty was also created by God. Atheist belive in nothing therefore never have to defend what they belive. They just attack others and hide behind this very self serving little trick. Its like when you ask someone what they would like to eat and they say "I don't care" then sit back and shoot down every thing you suggest.

[MrJmm999]

@UtherPendragan "Atheists believe in nothing"???? No...atheists simply don't believe in your magical sky daddy since there is no evidence for his/her/its existence. "Hide behind this self serving trick". What trick? You mean the trick of denying scientific evidence until you cannot ignore it any more......then giving your god credit for the very evidence you spent a lifetime denying. Honestly, you creationists have no shame

[UtherPendragan]

@MrJmm999 Ok cry baby. Tell me what you belive. Explain how life on earth came about. Step out from behind your bullshit smoke screen. Make a real point. Take a stand. Quit attacking what others say and say something yourself. You can't because atheist belive in nothing.

[MrJmm999]

@UtherPendragan Explain how life on earth came about? LOL. Well..the best scientific explanation is abiogenesis. Scientists have already produced RNA from what they believe was early earth conditions. That is the first step. Now, if you look at the study..the scientists didn't actually "do" anything...they simply put the chemicals that they think were in early earth conditions and the chemicals "did their thing". Now, this has NOTHING to do with being an atheists...only an informed person

[UtherPendragan]

@MrJmm999 Abiogenesis = Shit happens. This is my point. This the best you can come up with. This is the bullshit with which you want to replace God the creator with. A bumper sticker. You just proved atheist are idiots. God created those scientists and God created that RNA and all they did or ever will be able to do is attempt to figure out how he did it.

[MrJmm999]

@UtherPendragan You simply like putting "god dun it" as the reason for everything science currently does not absolutely know.  Man has done this since the beginning of time. We once thought that lighting and rain were caused by god(s)...but we now know that is not the case.

Can you provide EVIDENCE that your god created the scientists...or RNA?? You base everything on 100% blind faith. Must be great going through life believing in fairy tales and magic sky daddies.

[UtherPendragan]

@MrJmm999 If a policeman followed you around every moment of your life. He has his gun drawn and pointed at you ready to arrest you on a moments notice 24/7 every second of your life you are being watched. Would you ever break the law? How about if you are only watched half the time? What if there were no police, no jails, no courts? Is a magic sky daddy really such a bad thing? Or do you belive in the basic goodness of people?

[MrJmm999]

@UtherPendragan Yes...a magic sky daddy is such a bad thing when you consider the utter lack of evidence for his existence. Are you telling me that the only reason you behave humanely is because you think your god is watching? I don't break the law because doing so generally harms another person. Theism is no guide to good behavior. Look up statistics for Christians vs. Atheists prison population PERCENTAGE. Atheists are 10% of the U.S. population..yet less than 1% of the prison population

[UtherPendragan]

@MrJmm999 Atheist are not moral. Atheist are not even human. But thats ok because there really is no such thing as an atheist. I don't belive in them so they are not real. Right?

[MrJmm999]

@UtherPendragan Your inability to distinguish between things that do exist and things that do not exist is troublesome. Whether you BELIEVE something exists does not make it exist. Likewise..because you don't believe something exists..does not make it non existent. As far as atheists not being moral...i think the statistics i mentioned point out the fallacy in your statement. Also, did you know that married Christians have a better higher divorce rate than a married Atheists.

[UtherPendragan]

@MrJmm999 Atheist can not be married. If I don't belive something then it does not exist. There is no fallacy I am merely using the world view of an atheist to argue with an atheist. Nothing is so wonderful because there are no rules or limits. Nothing matters, there is no meaning, everything is subject to me and what I say. In other words there is no God because I am God.

[MrJmm999]

@UtherPendragan You don't seem to understand the difference between the belief in something and the existence of something. I can demonstrate/test/observe things that do indeed exist. My belief in something has no bearing on its existence.

Not to be rude..but you appear to be unable to make a coherent argument.

[UtherPendragan]

@MrJmm999 No by all means go ahead and be rude. You godless savage. Atheist are always rude. They always insult others. Atheist claim how smart they are and use terms like unimformed or you don't quite understand. Atheist always claim the high ground of logic and reason. The claim that in order for something to exist it must be proven. Do you love your mother? Ok now prove it. Is rock and roll better than rap? Prove it.

[MrJmm999]

@UtherPendragan Love is not a THING. It is an emotional feeling. Do you not understand the difference between feelings/emotions and actual entities?

You may indeed feel like many atheist "claim the high ground". However, that stems from conversations with people who are not able to distinguish reality from fantasy or who are unable to distinguish between existence and belief in existence.

[UtherPendragan]

@MrJmm999 Love is not a thing however it is something. It is real. It does not matter if you can touch it, or see it. Taste it or smell it. Faith is real also, beliving in something, knowing something because of a feeling is just as real and just as valid as any other test of reality. Being able to see something does not make it more real it just makes it easier to find. There is no difference belief is existence. Without belief nothing is real.

[grits011]

@UtherPendragan 'Without belief nothing is real.'

No, you're completely wrong. I believe there is no God. Just because I happen to believe it doesn't mean there isn't a God. There is either a God or there isn't, and my beliefs do nothing to change that. It goes the same for you. Your belief in God doesn't make it so.

[grits011]

@grits011 MrJmm999 made a good point before the conversation got off track. Biological change over time isn't evidence of design. It is caused by imperfections in the copying of genetic material and the cumulative change in that material over time. It isn't DESIGNED to change, unless you consider the flaws in the process part of the design. Genetic change in populations over time is a prediction based on random mutation/natural selection, not design.

[finchfrance]

Good vid! Another way you pwn him, is the fact that you list sources in the description, something neph has yet to do.

[sweatytoothmadman]

@finchfrance Anyone can pwn Nephy, its really equivalent to taking candy from a retarded child.