Lets all do science like creationist, we will point out all the anomalies in opposing theories, and then we must use the great false dichotomy to say,therefore our theory is true, but you must never reveal that your theory has so many holes,you could fly a 747 through it.Any person, who brings them up, just speaks so much nonsense,that no person will ever have time to answer them, and thus you will win the debates against them godless Satan worshipers who secretly believe in god but chose Satan
Lets all do science like creationist, we will point out all the anomalies in opposing theories, and then we must use the great false dichotomy to say,therefore our theory is true, but you must never reveal that your theory has so many holes,you could fly a 747 through it.Any person, who brings them up, just speaks so much nonsense,that no person will ever have time to answer them, and thus you will win the debates against them godless Satan worshipers who secretly believe in god but chose Satan
Is this guy for real - he sounds like he has a bad case of village atheist syndrome.
There are many factors that are still a research issue within the macro/micro evolution and origin of life debate. Most scientists don't really know how life came to be. Even Stanley Miller, whose experiments are cited in most biology text books, says that the origin of life is still unknown. The idea that dead material can come to life all by itself is not consistent with scientific observation.
@Thechristiancullen a better question would be are u for real? Evolution has nothing to do with life origins, that is a branch of science called abiogenesis, and they have better answers than the damn buybull
@mikee047x1 True evolution/marco/micro and the origin of life are different topics and debated within christianity.
Abiogenesis is still a research issue; Even Stanley Miller, whose experiments are cited in most biology text books, later recanted and said that the origin of life is still unknown. The idea that dead material can come to life all by itself is not consistent with scientific observation.
@Thechristiancullen "macro-" and "micro-" evolution are arbitrary terms, invented by creationists, that no self-respecting biologist would ever use. It's akin to calling 2+2 microarithmetic and 2,000,000+2,000,000 macroarithmetic.
@Kerberoz01 It has never been observed in any laboratory that mutations can cause one species to turn into another. Despite this, you atheists believe that given enough time, some animals will eventually evolve into other creatures.
@Thechristiancullen Except it has. There have been numerous studies where they bred fruit flies and they reached several points where the current generation couln't mate with prior generations. That, in the broadest sense, is speciation. once you have that, it's easy enough to see the new 'species' of fruit fly having a different probiscus(for example) and hence a different species
@TheAsaoirc Only smug atheists would regard this as fact - most scientists would still quietly regard this as a research issue. Under normal circumstances, creatures give birth to the same kind of creatures. It is established scientific fact that like begets like. If the DNA in an embryo is damaged, results in a mutant child that differs in some respect from its parent. Although a few mutations have been scientifically observed that are beneficial, most mutations produce inferior offspring.
@TheAsaoirc creationists will just tell you that fruit flies are all the same "kind" and won't be happy until you show them a lobster giving birth to a jaguar.
And the crocoduck is the very thing that would disprove evolution. These dimwits don't even know, that the very thing they DEMAND to prove evolution is the very thing that would DISPROVE evolution. I doubt they understand the depth of their ignorance. If they demand that dogs give birth to cats to prove evolution, they have understood absolutely ZERO about evolution. So which is it? Are they breaching the 9th commandment knowlingly or because of ignorance?
@tdjdk Firslty, evolution is not exclusive to atheism
2/ Evolution is debated within christianity
3/ Evolution like calivinsm are not issues of salvation
4/ More scientific evidence is casting doubts on the theory of macro evolution, for example: The Fossil Record, Living "Fossils", The Cambrian Explosion, New T.Rex Discoveries, "Missing Links" etc.
5/ Most scientists who queitly acknowledge that many areas of evolution are still a research issue - it is only atheists who are ignorant
@Kerberoz01 Sir Fred Hoyle, of Cambridge University stated that statistically the chances of one cell evolving was the same as a tornado passing through a junkyard and giving you a fully functional Boeing 747.
... ah, quote mining again, are we? You MUST be a religious fanatic. Such a poor tactic, and so frequently used by the loosing side in an argument. Why don't you also quote the rest of his statement? Obviously because that would excempt you from quote mining, and quote mining is clearly your agenda here
"Check out my videos "Religion is Ridiculous" (specifically christianity)...good stuff...rate it! Christians i CHALLENGE you to watchit with an open mind.....Anti-theists watch my vids and give them a thumbs up! Help spread the truth!"
@MultiPaulinator What'd a chimp ever do to you that you want to insult them like that? I mean perhaps a babboon but most of the other great apes look docile when compared to humans.
Except we have continually updated it since then. I.e. genetics and the grand synthesis. A lot of what Darwin said doesn't really apply to the newer theories anymore.
@apsdil Exactly, and you know what, that's the great thing about real science. We keep finding new information previously unknown to us and then update our theories.
@coltsrule5150 Darwin got his ideas from other scientists from his time and before him. By the way, many other scientists way before Darwin believed the world was older than the Bible says it is.
'I "see" and your "blind." I believe you meant, 'you're blind," not "your blind." Just because you are "holier than thou" does not mean you can trash the English language.
I suppose the world has always had and will always have individuals who hinder progress. Let them remain skeptical the world has already passed them by. Those who cannot accept the irrefutable evidence will be weeded out as time goes on.
@co2isgoodal Genesis is only an "ancient myth" that has no scientific background. The only scientific connections it does have are faulty interpretations made by inexperienced "scientists."
@co2isgoodal Correction, "biological evolution" (there are multiple evolutionary theories for different things; you certainly didn't mean cosmological evolution, since while that DID at one point challenge the church, the vast majority of theists have since come to accept that the earth isn't 6000 years old and at the center of the universe) is a scientific theory (theories aren't less than facts, they are greater than them...) that required a law to circumvent idiots decreeing things contrary.
law = the current best answer to a problem a society has.
It says nothing about how good the answer actually is.
And for the record: we should be in a society where we don't need laws to protect reason and logic, but sadly we do and so sadly we did have to make such a law...
@Truthiness231 I'm glad you qualified law as being the "Current" best answer and as tyranny. Except for it being the best answer I guess I'm in agreement. My religious experience was that it was voluntary and inclusive. Not so for the law. So you still get my tax dollars to teach my kids what i'm not particularly fond of them learning and from those I'm not particularly trusting to do.
@Truthiness231 You know it is funny that it is reasonable to pass a law that a persons religion has to be checked at the door of an institution that, by law, he or she defacto, must attend. Meaning public schools. Zimmerman mocks Christianity in this song by the name of "Creation Science" in the academic setting. In reality, religion is banned in the public schools. This is tyranny by totalitarians who ought to be challenged at every opportunity. But I am old enough to remember that simple...
...lack of the exercize of this right anihilated the right in totality. But being more realistic to todays world it is a shame that Zimmerman's joke is so pointedly appropos. Because I think students in public schools would have a much richer experience and become more mature and broad minded if exposed to a study of comparative religions than to be denied so much as a mere mention of something that is still held true by millions living in the real world today of which they will soon be a part.
@prrolg Some find it difficult to see the difference between "creation science" and theological study.
I remember studying the various religions in history class, but only up to their effects on history (that is to say, we'd discuss how Christianity spread; nothing supernatural).
"Creation science", however, doesn't even qualify as science. It's purely a belief thing. If there was anything testable about creation science - any validity whatsoever - it would be acceptable as science.
@Truthiness231 This is not an answer. You said that you are defending that which is testable and not above scrutiny. And this is the reason that religion must be mocked and destroyed? The truth of evolution is that a species over time will become an entirely different species. There is as much fact to support this theory as there is that Christ was divine. It is no more possible for scientists, especially the idiots that comment against religion on YT pages, to prove that the evolution I....
...have described is fact than it is to prove that God exists. Both require belief. It is also necessary to have an opened mind. I've known Christians who have an opened mind about science and even evolutionary science. An opened mind enables them to hold to their beliefs and accept scientific advance. I've yet to meet one who does not believe in the divinity of Christ, believes in evolution and has an opened mind. You are not willing to have a conversation with someone who you cannot ...
dismiss quickly. I'm fairly sure you won't consider my ideas so I'll say that you are fairly typical. You seem to be a cut above but like the morons that comment here and on other YT pages that deal with evolution science it's really all about bullying and making fun of Christians in the most idiotic way possible. I don't think you have the slightest problem with it either.
Have you ever heard of antibiotic resistance? The fact that we can't cure AIDS should be enough for an educated mind to pick up on where I'm going, but I'll continue. The fact that labradoodles exist (this is just one example of a hybrid species). The fact that we've seen the path of evolution in DNA. Evolution is currently happening. That's like saying test gravity, you currently are testing it. It's just a matter of realizing it.
@JAB63096 I kind of see what you are saying. I wasn't very polite to Truthiness231 but he was interesting and intelligent (probably more than I) and I was hoping he would reply. But he didn't so maybe I was a bit too impolite before we got into a longer discussion. Serves me right. But I see you all over this comment board. I've read some of your comments and I think you are ignorant. You're kind of dumb too and you don't know much. So I'm not interested in you
@prrolg I see you all over this comment board. I've read some of your comments and I think you are ignorant. You're kind of dumb too and you don't know much. Besides god and you, who else gets to judge?
@prrolg Also, knowing how the majority of the theists in this country are motivated: wouldn't you think that even most Christians in the US would be upset too if we taught all "view points" as you suggested (keeping in mind the one I'm defending is testable and not above scrutiny, the one you're defending has been torn apart multiple times and yet some still feel it's somehow beyond scrutiny)? I for one know a lot of southern baps that would flip if any "catholic talk" were going on at school =P
@Truthiness231 I'm not defending anything. I'm suggesting. Removal of religion from those who enter the hallowed halls of public school, abortion, gay rights, affirmative action etc etc have all been forced on those "Southern baps" and you worry about a little comparative religion course? When you get home to Mars, please don't tell them about me. OK? And I'm not sure what you're defending but tell me what it is. I'm betting it's not testable.
@prrolg Uh, just stick with that faq page, I think I'm done... you're rather incoherent and I have a sneaking suspicion you're being an ass about it, but then again I can't really tell on account of the incoherence...
@Truthiness231 Buddy I'm not incoherent. I have more than a sneaking suspicion that you'll comment on YT as long as you don't have to deal with ideas.
@co2isgoodal And yet you Christians believe that we should be basing our educational system, laws, and lives around some 2000 year old papyrus rags found in a cave. Brilliant.
This cell to cell fusion would have slowly become the dominant form of reproduction in certain populations of organisms and as the organisms themselves evolve so to would their reproduction eventually resulting in something that we would today recognize as sexual reproduction. The instantaneous switch to sexual reproduction your suggesting would not be neccessary (or possible) as the organism would be able to reproduce both sexually and asexually.
You heard people say- "it will never be found", "it ain't true", "it just can't be".
I'm here to tell you these People are wrong- I found it. Using Google Earth -
I found God's Watermarks of the REAL Garden of Eden. Look at my Channel and see the short Video I made of it. I didn't point all of it out either- there are many things still hid for you to find. Come see !
Christianity: The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree.
@wensel911 You forgot that you must drink his blood and confess every sinful thought (roughly defined as "anything except worshipping me") to the priesthood. Or the whole "Seven Plagues" thing, ending with the mass murder of every first-born child in Egypt. Sodom and Gomorra - two cities erased wholesale, because some random dude couldn't find any "innocents". Or the holy text encouraging incest.
And then we have things like the Knights Templar, the Inquisition, Indulgences, etc...
@wensel911 Evolution: The belief that all other beliefs are illegal. Just ask the government. Of course they'll lie. You have to use observation and reason to know it.
MUST SEE !! The Garden of Eden's Location as been discovered !! I've discovered something amazing on Our Planet !! God/Father left His Watermarks all over this planet !! LOOK AT MY VIDEOS !! LOOK WHAT I FOUND !!!!
The thing that kills me about this guy is what a good guitarist he is. That wouldn't be an easy song to play all the way through unless you were a professional caliber musician.
@stillmattwest: I totally agree. I saw him perform last weekend and he knocked my socks off!. While being funny as hell and a great lyricist he’s also a crackerjack guitarist. Can’t wait to hear him on banjo too. Zimmerman definitely knows his chops.
@ManardGCrebs How do you know people who have proven scientific facts know less than you? Prove it to us. These people who are quoted gave proof of their intellectual superiority to the average person and their ability to do something with this trait. You, have not. You have no basis for claiming to be smarter or knowing more than any of those people.
@ManardGCrebs Science has done things about disproving the existence of a god without even trying. And good luck getting your moral compass from a jealous god who endorses slavery, genocide, capture and rape of virgins, incest, and labels cutting any of your hair, wearing blended fabric (which you probably are now), homosexuality, masturbation, and planting 2 crops in 1 furrow as abominations. Morality comes from evolutionary need to help each other in order to survive. Not a rage filled god.
@ManardGCrebs Science has proven evolution to be fact as far as a theory can be proven (seeing as you clearly have only received a Christian "education" the definition of a theory states that a theory is impossible to be proven. Gravity would be a good parallel to evolution in that sense). Science does tell us where our conscious minds are as well. You see, we've figured out how the brain works. And when you die, your brain shuts down. So your "spirit" will have no way to consciously think.
@ManardGCrebs Science uses experimentation and changes it's claims based on the results of said experiments. Religion is voided once it is proven wrong on any of it's major aspects (which it has been) because it claims to have all of the answers through it's deity, and therefore can not change.
@ManardGCrebs Seeing as you copied the "Albert" part when you pasted this from your Google search in order to find ground to support your views, I would guess Albert Einstein. I agree that science is never going to know all of the answers, but assuming a god and especially YOUR god is the only other answer is outright dumb. Science is the best place we have for answers as to the questions we don't know. I'd trust ever-changing science over thousand year old never-changing books any day.
@ManardGCrebs Cursing isn't necessarily a personal attack. Cursing can come from many different places. If someone told me my decedents' education would be payed for for the rest of eternity, I might say something like "Fuck yeah!". This is not an attack by any means. This being an over exaggerated example, but it expresses my point. P.S.1) I've never seen Dawkins curse out of context, ever. 2) Atheists offer facts a good 90-95% of the time. Christians being on the receiving end.
@MrThePachuco Pretty sure if you use a broad vocabulary and show a basic scientific basis for your assertion fucking cursing doesn't show any motherfucking intellectual weakness. ;)
We're all on the same side. It isn't GOD who offers wrath. The Lord of Hostes offers wrath. Get it? HOST. It's a picture. Science people SHOULD understand if they're about science.
Wrath = YOUR measuRED FILL = "Lord's Wrath"
Some of you are REALLY harsh. You're filling up your judgment. You judge you. That's the balance. That's the beauty of it.
Be careful people. Love your family. Hate not others. Believe it not, you feel good & bad energy already. Peace.
Lifelong agnostic who has Seen a lot. We were born naked, screaming, blind & babbling. BORN INTO BABYLON. Created in Eternity and born into Knowledge. We're here to learn what's known as Divine Law. Patience over frustration. Your choice. Compassion over aggression. Choice. Eternal Life over neverending death. YOUR CHOICE. (What did you think Tree was? A tree with leaves? Seriously?) Who judges you? YOU JUDGE YOURSELF. Judge another as "stupid" or "bad" = YOURS.
Anybody saying the 1611 King James Bible contains messages that limit Heaven as a special eternal club for "Christians" where all gays, atheists & those refusing slavery go to hell KNOW IT NOT. Rather, they're selling the Image of the Beast.
No conflicts w/ science.
We're Children of Light. We ALL go. You'll be Saved, Damn it, whether you like it or not. BELIEVE IT NOT! Beliefs are little boxes limiting sight. Just keep your eyes open. Look in the mirror: YOU'RE PERFECT. Judge not = Sight.
-beliefs are little boxes limiting Sight. If a scientist claims that science & God are at odds with one another, then he's not practicing science, but rather a religion. Science is remaining open to what may be. Essentially, science is agnostic. The facts are the facts. No agenda should limit discovery.
Unfortunately, Christians by & large, know not the language of Prophesy (Grace) & Prideful "scientists" fight like children over their own misunderstandings.
Many believers of "science" color their view of being "logical" behind a disgust that limits sight & puts the mind behind a vaile of confusion. BeLIEvers trumpet false "science" that turns the scientific method upside down by setting limits of observation during the observation & discovery phase ironically enough. Self congratulations are had while mocking the picture book known as The Bible because they ridiculously took it literally. "SCIENCE" is often championed by those who know it not.
Many believers of "science" color their view of being "logical" behind a disgust that limits sight & puts the mind behind a vaile of confusion. BeLIEvers trumpet false "science" that turns the scientific method upside down by setting limits of observation during the observation and discovery phase ironically enough. Self congratulations are had while mocking the picture book known as The Bible because they ridiculously took it literally. "SCIENCE" is often championed by those who know it not.
This was a failure I'm making a note here: TRAGIC LOSS It's hard to understate their contribution Creation Science We lie when we can because we must To preserve the Bible's word the way we wanted it read But there's no use hiding all the Bible's mistakes we'll just claim it's context when there's a talking snake and we'll say they will burn if they dare try to learn that our "theory" is still just a lie
@helenchedar, because there isn't now and never has been any evidence whatsoever of a "God." Science deals in observations of the natural world. Religion simply isn't relevant.
@helencheddar Because there's no evidence that even remotely suggests that. If there were, then it would be, but science is the observation of phenomenal through natural causes.
@adamchrome a belief is an opinion that something is true. In many people's opinions, science is true, therefore science has belief in it. Do you not BELIEVE in scientific facts.
As long as a belief has evidence going for it (i.e: NOT faith), then it's science.
Most theists nowadays believe that god guided evolution (Over 99% of the scientific community, as far as biology majors go, accepts evolution, yet 51% believes in a god in some form)
Most creationists are against this, because it goes against their version of a holy book (quran, bible, torah and ,to a lesser extent, baghavad gita).
@adamchrome a belief is an opinion that something is true. In many people's opinions, science is true, therefore science has belief in it. Do you not BELIEVE in scientific facts.
@helencheddar Not in the same way, no. If I scientific fact, or even a scientific theory, is proven to be false then I will no longer think that it is true... If something fundamental to natural law like electromagnetism was discovered to be something other than what it is, there would need to be plenty of evidence to do so but provided that there is, then science will change. Science always changes and there is no 'belief'. There is logic and reason.
@Xgya2000 Clearly I meant 'belief' as in faith, as that's the way in with the original comment was proposing it. 'Believe' that god started evolution? That is not how science works at all. No rationalist would say that they 'believe' something on faith (which is how religion works... there is no evidence-based argument that doesn't fall either outside of personal experience or unless you assume that the diety exists in the first place).
creationism- the belief in a God who gives all apes and humans vitamin C genes which he then switched off and turns into unusable pseudogenes. A god who sticks vestigal legs on whales for shits and giggles, and gives ostriches hollow bones even though they don't fly. They're notion of God is insane.... but then, what else is new?
@JuniusFaction Well said, the fucked up part is that they're explanation for those observations is that God just did it and we don't understand why. lol
I don't understand the resistance to accepting evolution. It's a beautiful explanation to how we got here. It also tells us life is constantly evolving, we're always moving, changing, growing.
@Zerafinel You don't understand? Seriously? It completely negates the necessity of a deity to explain the existence of life. It fucks up the minds of religious people.
@MrBretowsky Well, you know, in Europe every* believer is fine with evolution, even the catholic cult. (*except for some muslim immigrants). But don't ask them where original sin then comes from when not from Adam....
@Zerafinel the resistance is because it is a direct contradiction against the literal explanation of the Bible. Only religious people have a problem against evolution, I've yet to meet an atheist who is against evolution.
@Casshyr Actually there are a number of evolutionists who start to look at the quack science behind it then later become Christians. Evolution survives only because of a naturalistic precondition. The math underlying evolution is utterly impossible. Evolution is a religion - a modern day creation myth. Have a look at the DNA video on my channel. Cheers!
@alyosha24601 still, based on last time i check, over 99% of scientists believe in evolution, and the proportion of theistic evolutionists are climbing. Creationists, on the other hand, are declining, from 45% in 2005 to 40% in 2009. I haven't check the latest 2011 results yet, but i'm sure it's even lower.
@Casshyr I think about 70%(?) of scientists believe in evolution. Of course almost no scientist can aggressively question it, as they'll lose careers and the ability to publish. As one Chinese paleontologist said last year: "In my country you can criticize Darwin but not the government, in America you can criticize the government but not Darwin." As for me, I am happy to ignore the Bible. The science alone is enough to devastate the evolution religion. We observe DNA degrading, not evolving.
@Casshyr No, micro-evolution (misnamed) does occur. But micro-evolution cannot be used as evidence for evolution as adaptation occurs by removing information, not creating it. When Napoleon got all the tall Frenchmen killed in Russia, France became short. That's not evolution. All dog breeds were created in the last 400 years. They were bred intentionally by removing unwanted traits. Otherwise we're actually saying new genetic material was created in 400 years? Evolution is quack science.
@Casshyr (Part I:) No, "micro-evolution" does occur. Such adaptations are used as "proof" of evolution but this is dishonest as micro-e is *removing* information, not creating it. It's a bait 'n switch! When peppered moths switch color or finches change beak size it's a temporary adaptation (both have returned to the prior condition. They don't tell you that!) All 400 dog breeds have been produced since 1500 (?). People did it by selecting the traits they wanted, (cont)
@Casshyr (cont from below) ...undesirable traits were deliberately selected out - information removed. Otherwise we are faced with claiming that 400 new creatures "evolved" in just 500 years! If that were the case, don't you think there would be some mutant pooches along the way, considering deleterious mutations outnumber beneficial ones in the lab 1 million to one? See my channel: "The Degeneration of DNA: Mutation Rates Invalidate "Evolution" " Evolution is a religion, it's "science-free".
@alyosha24601 1. Look up the definition of religion, your clearly confused.
2. I'm not even going to begin to tell you all that's wrong with what you just said. Impossible in under 500 characters. Let's for argument's sake say that evolution is wrong. You still have yet to prove creationism. You try to poke these tiny holes in evolution and fail, yet you still have no basis for saying we were created from dirt and a rib then incestuously populated the Earth. Go ahead, I'm listening.
@JAB63096 Look, I'm not your enemy, and I'm not stupid either. Creation is quite self-consistent if you just change your frame of reference from man to God. Once that is done, you can follow the science without a naturalistic precondition. Let's look at this issue: Sexual reproduction. How could this possibly begin? There have to be many millions of perfectly corresponding mutations, none recessive, occur in two creatures at once, they find each other - all in ONE GENERATION!! This is impossible
@alyosha24601 You need to learn the difference between impossible and improbable. Out of millions of years and generations, probability would dictate that that would happen at least once. Still, you are trying to disprove evolution. Pretend evolution never even existed. Now prove creation.
@JAB63096 Not improbable. An event that requires a six digit exponent can NEVER occur, much less in a 4 billion year blink of an eye. Your chance of picking a single electron in the universe has a two digit exponent - but even that impossible event is a number followed by 299,920 zeroes more likely to happen than the spontaneous creation of a living cell, or "spontaneous split to sexual reproduction" . You have the freedom to curse God, use it - but creation is a mathematical fact. God is real.
@alyosha24601 Incredibly incomplete thought. You filled in the numerator, then left out the denominator. An event might only happen one in a million times, yet given 100 million opportunities it will happen roughly 100 times. With the size of our universe, a planet with all of the correct conditions is more than probable for what occurred on Earth, to occur.
@alyosha24601 I'm not sure how you pulled that number out of your ass but it sounds like you’re under the impression that sexual reproduction was the result of an entire generation of multicellular eukaryotic organisms undergoing millions of simultaneous mutations that all happened to be beneficial for the occurrence of sexual reproduction.
Evolution does not work like it does in Pokémon, Cats don’t evolve into dogs, monkeys don’t evolve into humans and species don’t spontaneously grow penises.
@alyosha24601 There are several theories as to how sexual reproduction started that you can read up on but first of all you’re going to need to understand that the jump from asexual reproduction and sexual reproduction isn’t black and white. It would have involved numerous generations of single celled organisms undergoing some sort of cell to cell fusion as a result of an external stressor which would have eventually resulted in the mixing of genes and a meiosis like process occuring.
There are quite a few arguments going on in here. Both sides need to approach this just like any other argument. You need to see the oppositions side and if you're going to win you better know it pretty darn well. It would help to know some facts about your subject matter. Facts are just that. Facts. They do not lean left or right they are only facts. You cannot use opinion as fact. That never wins. If you have some evidence that would be real handy as well.
When comedy is made of the political extremist clowns, isn't that like a double negative? Which would therefore result in a positive? Religious fundamentalist extremism is terrorizing and inegalitarian by nature, no matter which religion mankind decides to fall headfirst into and use as a weapon upon others!
What does atheism tell young people in Britain riots = you are an animal - a pig sitting around on your XBOX with no sense of respect, values, or hard work ethic = lawlessness, islam and godless youths.
Two thousand years of blind denial. You are following pale illusions. As you listen to the false preachers. You delight in this ignorant slavery. The enslavery that is chist. He is the ultimate deception of life. Adorning his empty words. Drown your mind his weakened holiness. The parasite of arrogance. Satan appears to halt this endless folly. Open your eyes and see the dark master. As he crushes your savior into the ground. The blood of christ washes along the shores of hell.
@garrettdw2 Same here. I went from Christianity to Satanism, and didn't like either. I started studying physics and eventually decided it was all BS. FYI, true Satanists don't worship Satan. Those people are called pseudo-satanists, and they're classified as a cult, not a religion. Satanists believe that the strong will inherit the Earth, the weak don't deserve it. Being a LaVeyan Satanist is a bit of an egotistical view, but a very nice one for Evolutionists. Their deadly sins are quite a read.
@Fragacide Yeah, I tried learning physics on my own(Only 16 going into Alegbra 2). I was like, damn....This is hard. Idk, I've always loved physics for some reason.
This has been flagged as spam show
Lets all do science like creationist, we will point out all the anomalies in opposing theories, and then we must use the great false dichotomy to say,therefore our theory is true, but you must never reveal that your theory has so many holes,you could fly a 747 through it.Any person, who brings them up, just speaks so much nonsense,that no person will ever have time to answer them, and thus you will win the debates against them godless Satan worshipers who secretly believe in god but chose Satan
KevZen2000 5 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Lets all do science like creationist, we will point out all the anomalies in opposing theories, and then we must use the great false dichotomy to say,therefore our theory is true, but you must never reveal that your theory has so many holes,you could fly a 747 through it.Any person, who brings them up, just speaks so much nonsense,that no person will ever have time to answer them, and thus you will win the debates against them godless Satan worshipers who secretly believe in god but chose Satan
KevZen2000 5 days ago
Is this guy for real - he sounds like he has a bad case of village atheist syndrome.
There are many factors that are still a research issue within the macro/micro evolution and origin of life debate. Most scientists don't really know how life came to be. Even Stanley Miller, whose experiments are cited in most biology text books, says that the origin of life is still unknown. The idea that dead material can come to life all by itself is not consistent with scientific observation.
Thechristiancullen 5 days ago
@Thechristiancullen a better question would be are u for real? Evolution has nothing to do with life origins, that is a branch of science called abiogenesis, and they have better answers than the damn buybull
mikee047x1 3 days ago in playlist Favorite videos
@mikee047x1 True evolution/marco/micro and the origin of life are different topics and debated within christianity.
Abiogenesis is still a research issue; Even Stanley Miller, whose experiments are cited in most biology text books, later recanted and said that the origin of life is still unknown. The idea that dead material can come to life all by itself is not consistent with scientific observation.
Thechristiancullen 3 days ago
@Thechristiancullen "macro-" and "micro-" evolution are arbitrary terms, invented by creationists, that no self-respecting biologist would ever use. It's akin to calling 2+2 microarithmetic and 2,000,000+2,000,000 macroarithmetic.
Kerberoz01 2 days ago
@Kerberoz01 It has never been observed in any laboratory that mutations can cause one species to turn into another. Despite this, you atheists believe that given enough time, some animals will eventually evolve into other creatures.
Thechristiancullen 2 days ago
@Thechristiancullen Except it has. There have been numerous studies where they bred fruit flies and they reached several points where the current generation couln't mate with prior generations. That, in the broadest sense, is speciation. once you have that, it's easy enough to see the new 'species' of fruit fly having a different probiscus(for example) and hence a different species
TheAsaoirc 1 day ago
@TheAsaoirc Only smug atheists would regard this as fact - most scientists would still quietly regard this as a research issue. Under normal circumstances, creatures give birth to the same kind of creatures. It is established scientific fact that like begets like. If the DNA in an embryo is damaged, results in a mutant child that differs in some respect from its parent. Although a few mutations have been scientifically observed that are beneficial, most mutations produce inferior offspring.
Thechristiancullen 1 day ago
@TheAsaoirc creationists will just tell you that fruit flies are all the same "kind" and won't be happy until you show them a lobster giving birth to a jaguar.
Kerberoz01 1 day ago
@Kerberoz01
And the crocoduck is the very thing that would disprove evolution. These dimwits don't even know, that the very thing they DEMAND to prove evolution is the very thing that would DISPROVE evolution. I doubt they understand the depth of their ignorance. If they demand that dogs give birth to cats to prove evolution, they have understood absolutely ZERO about evolution. So which is it? Are they breaching the 9th commandment knowlingly or because of ignorance?
tdjdk 22 hours ago
@tdjdk Firslty, evolution is not exclusive to atheism
2/ Evolution is debated within christianity
3/ Evolution like calivinsm are not issues of salvation
4/ More scientific evidence is casting doubts on the theory of macro evolution, for example: The Fossil Record, Living "Fossils", The Cambrian Explosion, New T.Rex Discoveries, "Missing Links" etc.
5/ Most scientists who queitly acknowledge that many areas of evolution are still a research issue - it is only atheists who are ignorant
Thechristiancullen 20 hours ago
@Thechristiancullen I'm pretty sure no one has ever counted to a trillion, either. By your logic, that would make its existence a research issue.
Kerberoz01 1 day ago
@Kerberoz01 Sir Fred Hoyle, of Cambridge University stated that statistically the chances of one cell evolving was the same as a tornado passing through a junkyard and giving you a fully functional Boeing 747.
Thechristiancullen 1 day ago
@Thechristiancullen
... ah, quote mining again, are we? You MUST be a religious fanatic. Such a poor tactic, and so frequently used by the loosing side in an argument. Why don't you also quote the rest of his statement? Obviously because that would excempt you from quote mining, and quote mining is clearly your agenda here
tdjdk 22 hours ago
@Thechristiancullen
Go away troll, you are SO easily recognized it's embarassing, even to your quote mining peers
tdjdk 22 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Check out my videos "Religion is Ridiculous" (specifically christianity)...good stuff...rate it! Christians i CHALLENGE you to watchit with an open mind.....Anti-theists watch my vids and give them a thumbs up! Help spread the truth!"
gasmask4poop 1 week ago
To really understand Evolution, there are many other areas one must also have at least basic understanding of.
To really, really, really believe in Creationism, one need not KNOW or Understand much at all. The Less, the Better!
The more scientifically literate one is, the less likely one to believe Gods & Creationism.
psycotria 1 week ago 3
@psycotria Your statement is actually proven by the bible.
The apple represented knowledge, and the pursuit of which was seen as sin.
AKA: Learn more, go to hell.
spiderpig85 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MaximusArurealius
That Cheerleader for the retard trans, Foxlake02 said
"So far there have been no credible challenges to the basic darwinian principles"
hahahahahahahahaha Her friend trans thinks her evo faith is a joke.
trans said " Darwinian evolution"..... LOLOL what's next planckinian atoms? LOLOLOL"
hahahahahahahahahahaha
WildCatsKitten1 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@foxlake02
Hi odinata aka claire etc
WildCatsKitten1 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@foxlake02 So far there have been no credible challenges to the basic darwinian principles"
hahahahahahahahaha
Hey Cheerleader, Your retarded friend trans thinks your evo faith is a joke.
trans said " Darwinian evolution"..... LOLOL what's next planckinian atoms? LOL LOLOL"
hahahahahahahahahahaha
WildCatsKitten1 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
WildCatsKitten1 3 weeks ago
brilliant !
butterflyhugsopera 3 weeks ago
"Blind faith in Science and empirical inquiry and observable reality and... other myths." :'D
XplosivCookie 3 weeks ago 2
he's a good musician and an average comedian.. his timing is good but the humor is a little stale :)
XplosivCookie 3 weeks ago
1566 people are still apes :D
outcast569 3 weeks ago
@outcast569 Correction: 10,731... oops 10,732 people are proud to be apes. 1566 are violent, female-subjugating chimpanzees. Cheers. :-D
MultiPaulinator 3 weeks ago
@MultiPaulinator Touche :D
outcast569 3 weeks ago
@MultiPaulinator What'd a chimp ever do to you that you want to insult them like that? I mean perhaps a babboon but most of the other great apes look docile when compared to humans.
ratholin 3 weeks ago
@RoyZimmerman are you an atheist? Cause we need every single secular person telling the government to stop fucking with church-state separation.
MoralRapist 3 weeks ago
darwins theory is over 150 years old,think about it
in all that time the greatest creationist arguments havent been able to top the theory of evolution
keep trying tho
you are a good laugh ill have to say
coltsrule5150 1 month ago 3
@coltsrule5150
Except we have continually updated it since then. I.e. genetics and the grand synthesis. A lot of what Darwin said doesn't really apply to the newer theories anymore.
That said, he had the basics right.
apsdil 1 month ago 3
@apsdil Exactly, and you know what, that's the great thing about real science. We keep finding new information previously unknown to us and then update our theories.
TheKrihus 1 month ago
@coltsrule5150 Darwin got his ideas from other scientists from his time and before him. By the way, many other scientists way before Darwin believed the world was older than the Bible says it is.
multisnootylives1 4 weeks ago
religion: because thinking is hard!
MoralRapist 1 month ago 29
@MoralRapist Simple and to the point, I like it.
tbearpartytime 2 weeks ago
i want to marry him
Frog869 1 month ago 3
1565 are creationist.
TheCanadianDude 1 month ago
@TheCanadianDude true, but also brainwashed/ignorant/rejecting reality
ladev91 1 month ago
@ladev91 Lol also true :)
TheCanadianDude 1 month ago
yaay the shortest comment :P
MineCraftForever100 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ummm...the first day of week is Sunday.
andiroo42 2 months ago
@ManardGCrebs
'I "see" and your "blind." I believe you meant, 'you're blind," not "your blind." Just because you are "holier than thou" does not mean you can trash the English language.
Dougibert 2 months ago
Comment removed
SaintBoot7 2 months ago
I suppose the world has always had and will always have individuals who hinder progress. Let them remain skeptical the world has already passed them by. Those who cannot accept the irrefutable evidence will be weeded out as time goes on.
pj141406 2 months ago
Evolution is the only "scientific theory" that needs laws to protect it!"
co2isgoodal 3 months ago
@co2isgoodal Genesis is only an "ancient myth" that has no scientific background. The only scientific connections it does have are faulty interpretations made by inexperienced "scientists."
multisnootylives1 3 months ago 3
@co2isgoodal Correction, "biological evolution" (there are multiple evolutionary theories for different things; you certainly didn't mean cosmological evolution, since while that DID at one point challenge the church, the vast majority of theists have since come to accept that the earth isn't 6000 years old and at the center of the universe) is a scientific theory (theories aren't less than facts, they are greater than them...) that required a law to circumvent idiots decreeing things contrary.
Truthiness231 3 months ago 21
@Truthiness231 Everybody knows law = truth and decree = tyranny.
prrolg 2 months ago
@prrolg law != truth/decree/tyranny
law = the current best answer to a problem a society has.
It says nothing about how good the answer actually is.
And for the record: we should be in a society where we don't need laws to protect reason and logic, but sadly we do and so sadly we did have to make such a law...
Truthiness231 2 months ago
@Truthiness231 I'm glad you qualified law as being the "Current" best answer and as tyranny. Except for it being the best answer I guess I'm in agreement. My religious experience was that it was voluntary and inclusive. Not so for the law. So you still get my tax dollars to teach my kids what i'm not particularly fond of them learning and from those I'm not particularly trusting to do.
prrolg 2 months ago
@Truthiness231 You know it is funny that it is reasonable to pass a law that a persons religion has to be checked at the door of an institution that, by law, he or she defacto, must attend. Meaning public schools. Zimmerman mocks Christianity in this song by the name of "Creation Science" in the academic setting. In reality, religion is banned in the public schools. This is tyranny by totalitarians who ought to be challenged at every opportunity. But I am old enough to remember that simple...
prrolg 2 months ago
...lack of the exercize of this right anihilated the right in totality. But being more realistic to todays world it is a shame that Zimmerman's joke is so pointedly appropos. Because I think students in public schools would have a much richer experience and become more mature and broad minded if exposed to a study of comparative religions than to be denied so much as a mere mention of something that is still held true by millions living in the real world today of which they will soon be a part.
prrolg 2 months ago
@prrolg Some find it difficult to see the difference between "creation science" and theological study.
I remember studying the various religions in history class, but only up to their effects on history (that is to say, we'd discuss how Christianity spread; nothing supernatural).
"Creation science", however, doesn't even qualify as science. It's purely a belief thing. If there was anything testable about creation science - any validity whatsoever - it would be acceptable as science.
Truthiness231 2 months ago
@Truthiness231 What's testable about evolution?
prrolg 2 months ago
@prrolg Your question and many others can be found here: evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/misconceptions_faq.php#e1
Truthiness231 2 months ago
@Truthiness231 This is not an answer. You said that you are defending that which is testable and not above scrutiny. And this is the reason that religion must be mocked and destroyed? The truth of evolution is that a species over time will become an entirely different species. There is as much fact to support this theory as there is that Christ was divine. It is no more possible for scientists, especially the idiots that comment against religion on YT pages, to prove that the evolution I....
prrolg 2 months ago
...have described is fact than it is to prove that God exists. Both require belief. It is also necessary to have an opened mind. I've known Christians who have an opened mind about science and even evolutionary science. An opened mind enables them to hold to their beliefs and accept scientific advance. I've yet to meet one who does not believe in the divinity of Christ, believes in evolution and has an opened mind. You are not willing to have a conversation with someone who you cannot ...
prrolg 2 months ago
dismiss quickly. I'm fairly sure you won't consider my ideas so I'll say that you are fairly typical. You seem to be a cut above but like the morons that comment here and on other YT pages that deal with evolution science it's really all about bullying and making fun of Christians in the most idiotic way possible. I don't think you have the slightest problem with it either.
prrolg 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@prrolg Your question and many others can be found here: evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/misconceptions_faq.php#e1
Truthiness231 2 months ago
@prrolg "What's testable about evolution?"
Have you ever heard of antibiotic resistance? The fact that we can't cure AIDS should be enough for an educated mind to pick up on where I'm going, but I'll continue. The fact that labradoodles exist (this is just one example of a hybrid species). The fact that we've seen the path of evolution in DNA. Evolution is currently happening. That's like saying test gravity, you currently are testing it. It's just a matter of realizing it.
JAB63096 1 month ago
@JAB63096 I kind of see what you are saying. I wasn't very polite to Truthiness231 but he was interesting and intelligent (probably more than I) and I was hoping he would reply. But he didn't so maybe I was a bit too impolite before we got into a longer discussion. Serves me right. But I see you all over this comment board. I've read some of your comments and I think you are ignorant. You're kind of dumb too and you don't know much. So I'm not interested in you
prrolg 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@prrolg Well isn't that the pot calling the kettle black...
JAB63096 1 month ago
@prrolg I see you all over this comment board. I've read some of your comments and I think you are ignorant. You're kind of dumb too and you don't know much. Besides god and you, who else gets to judge?
pchtermino1 1 month ago
@pchtermino1 You do. Go ahead and judge away moron.
prrolg 1 month ago
@pchtermino1 Look! a cowards faceless troll channel.
prrolg 1 month ago
@prrolg Also, knowing how the majority of the theists in this country are motivated: wouldn't you think that even most Christians in the US would be upset too if we taught all "view points" as you suggested (keeping in mind the one I'm defending is testable and not above scrutiny, the one you're defending has been torn apart multiple times and yet some still feel it's somehow beyond scrutiny)? I for one know a lot of southern baps that would flip if any "catholic talk" were going on at school =P
Truthiness231 2 months ago
@Truthiness231 I'm not defending anything. I'm suggesting. Removal of religion from those who enter the hallowed halls of public school, abortion, gay rights, affirmative action etc etc have all been forced on those "Southern baps" and you worry about a little comparative religion course? When you get home to Mars, please don't tell them about me. OK? And I'm not sure what you're defending but tell me what it is. I'm betting it's not testable.
prrolg 2 months ago
@prrolg Uh, just stick with that faq page, I think I'm done... you're rather incoherent and I have a sneaking suspicion you're being an ass about it, but then again I can't really tell on account of the incoherence...
Truthiness231 2 months ago
Comment removed
prrolg 2 months ago
@Truthiness231 Buddy I'm not incoherent. I have more than a sneaking suspicion that you'll comment on YT as long as you don't have to deal with ideas.
prrolg 2 months ago
@co2isgoodal And yet you Christians believe that we should be basing our educational system, laws, and lives around some 2000 year old papyrus rags found in a cave. Brilliant.
LordBizarre112233 2 months ago
This cell to cell fusion would have slowly become the dominant form of reproduction in certain populations of organisms and as the organisms themselves evolve so to would their reproduction eventually resulting in something that we would today recognize as sexual reproduction. The instantaneous switch to sexual reproduction your suggesting would not be neccessary (or possible) as the organism would be able to reproduce both sexually and asexually.
094250001 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You heard people say- "it will never be found", "it ain't true", "it just can't be".
I'm here to tell you these People are wrong- I found it. Using Google Earth -
I found God's Watermarks of the REAL Garden of Eden. Look at my Channel and see the short Video I made of it. I didn't point all of it out either- there are many things still hid for you to find. Come see !
downyourtube 3 months ago
If there's one thing I know in this life . . . it's that there is a God.
fungusundies 3 months ago
@fungusundies How could you possibly know that. Knowing something means you have undeniable evidence of it. Please present said evidence of your god.
JAB63096 3 months ago
@fungusundies XD
KissMeQuenley 3 months ago
Christianity: The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree.
wensel911 3 months ago 43
@wensel911 when you put it that way they belong in an asylum :) very funny lol
totallykeet 3 months ago
@wensel911 when you put it like that all religions sound stupid. also that just shows ignorance about the message behind the bible.
TheSpeedy0504 2 months ago
@wensel911 You forgot that you must drink his blood and confess every sinful thought (roughly defined as "anything except worshipping me") to the priesthood. Or the whole "Seven Plagues" thing, ending with the mass murder of every first-born child in Egypt. Sodom and Gomorra - two cities erased wholesale, because some random dude couldn't find any "innocents". Or the holy text encouraging incest.
And then we have things like the Knights Templar, the Inquisition, Indulgences, etc...
LordSia13 2 months ago
@wensel911 Evolution: The belief that all other beliefs are illegal. Just ask the government. Of course they'll lie. You have to use observation and reason to know it.
prrolg 2 months ago
@wensel911
You're misrepresenting Christianity by omitting this:
Technically, Jesus is not a zombie. He may have risen from the dead, but instead of eating other people - they eat him.
Also, you forgot to mention that he sacrificed himself to himself to create a loophole for a rule that he himself created.
CallMeMrNameless 1 month ago
@wensel911 you hit the nail on the head
1RWF1 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
MUST SEE !! The Garden of Eden's Location as been discovered !! I've discovered something amazing on Our Planet !! God/Father left His Watermarks all over this planet !! LOOK AT MY VIDEOS !! LOOK WHAT I FOUND !!!!
downyourtube 3 months ago
@ManardGCrebs No cop out there... smh
JAB63096 3 months ago
The thing that kills me about this guy is what a good guitarist he is. That wouldn't be an easy song to play all the way through unless you were a professional caliber musician.
stillmattwest 3 months ago in playlist stillmattwest's favorites
@stillmattwest He's a great lyricist aswell
ThePariahLivesOn 3 months ago
@stillmattwest: I totally agree. I saw him perform last weekend and he knocked my socks off!. While being funny as hell and a great lyricist he’s also a crackerjack guitarist. Can’t wait to hear him on banjo too. Zimmerman definitely knows his chops.
nightbirdbabe 3 months ago
@ManardGCrebs How do you know people who have proven scientific facts know less than you? Prove it to us. These people who are quoted gave proof of their intellectual superiority to the average person and their ability to do something with this trait. You, have not. You have no basis for claiming to be smarter or knowing more than any of those people.
JAB63096 3 months ago
Science doesn't wait for anybody, it is up to man to discover. If man doesn't want to discover, then let's go to church.
sebasp777 3 months ago
@ManardGCrebs Science has done things about disproving the existence of a god without even trying. And good luck getting your moral compass from a jealous god who endorses slavery, genocide, capture and rape of virgins, incest, and labels cutting any of your hair, wearing blended fabric (which you probably are now), homosexuality, masturbation, and planting 2 crops in 1 furrow as abominations. Morality comes from evolutionary need to help each other in order to survive. Not a rage filled god.
JAB63096 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
« Man is MORE than 5 senses or some chemicals and electrical impulse »
Really? How do you know?
XGralgrathor 3 months ago
@ManardGCrebs "why would I want to let myself be influenced by people who know less than I do?" Well, you follow the Bible.
filorps 3 months ago
@ManardGCrebs Talkorigins[dot]org you might learn a thing or two if you educate yourself in a school rather than a church.
JAB63096 3 months ago
@ManardGCrebs Science has proven evolution to be fact as far as a theory can be proven (seeing as you clearly have only received a Christian "education" the definition of a theory states that a theory is impossible to be proven. Gravity would be a good parallel to evolution in that sense). Science does tell us where our conscious minds are as well. You see, we've figured out how the brain works. And when you die, your brain shuts down. So your "spirit" will have no way to consciously think.
JAB63096 3 months ago
@ManardGCrebs Science uses experimentation and changes it's claims based on the results of said experiments. Religion is voided once it is proven wrong on any of it's major aspects (which it has been) because it claims to have all of the answers through it's deity, and therefore can not change.
JAB63096 3 months ago
@ManardGCrebs Seeing as you copied the "Albert" part when you pasted this from your Google search in order to find ground to support your views, I would guess Albert Einstein. I agree that science is never going to know all of the answers, but assuming a god and especially YOUR god is the only other answer is outright dumb. Science is the best place we have for answers as to the questions we don't know. I'd trust ever-changing science over thousand year old never-changing books any day.
JAB63096 3 months ago
@ManardGCrebs Cursing isn't necessarily a personal attack. Cursing can come from many different places. If someone told me my decedents' education would be payed for for the rest of eternity, I might say something like "Fuck yeah!". This is not an attack by any means. This being an over exaggerated example, but it expresses my point. P.S.1) I've never seen Dawkins curse out of context, ever. 2) Atheists offer facts a good 90-95% of the time. Christians being on the receiving end.
JAB63096 3 months ago
Because cus words just show lack of vocabulary and it makes you sound dumber
MrThePachuco 4 months ago
@MrThePachuco Pretty sure if you use a broad vocabulary and show a basic scientific basis for your assertion fucking cursing doesn't show any motherfucking intellectual weakness. ;)
JAB63096 4 months ago
Why is everybody so polite in these arguments aboutreligion
MrFudgecake98 4 months ago
We're all on the same side. It isn't GOD who offers wrath. The Lord of Hostes offers wrath. Get it? HOST. It's a picture. Science people SHOULD understand if they're about science.
Wrath = YOUR measuRED FILL = "Lord's Wrath"
Some of you are REALLY harsh. You're filling up your judgment. You judge you. That's the balance. That's the beauty of it.
Be careful people. Love your family. Hate not others. Believe it not, you feel good & bad energy already. Peace.
-Agnostic always
likwidshoe 4 months ago
Lifelong agnostic who has Seen a lot. We were born naked, screaming, blind & babbling. BORN INTO BABYLON. Created in Eternity and born into Knowledge. We're here to learn what's known as Divine Law. Patience over frustration. Your choice. Compassion over aggression. Choice. Eternal Life over neverending death. YOUR CHOICE. (What did you think Tree was? A tree with leaves? Seriously?) Who judges you? YOU JUDGE YOURSELF. Judge another as "stupid" or "bad" = YOURS.
Your biggest opponent is you.
likwidshoe 4 months ago
Anybody saying the 1611 King James Bible contains messages that limit Heaven as a special eternal club for "Christians" where all gays, atheists & those refusing slavery go to hell KNOW IT NOT. Rather, they're selling the Image of the Beast.
No conflicts w/ science.
We're Children of Light. We ALL go. You'll be Saved, Damn it, whether you like it or not. BELIEVE IT NOT! Beliefs are little boxes limiting sight. Just keep your eyes open. Look in the mirror: YOU'RE PERFECT. Judge not = Sight.
likwidshoe 4 months ago
There's no arguing with PRIDE.
-beliefs are little boxes limiting Sight. If a scientist claims that science & God are at odds with one another, then he's not practicing science, but rather a religion. Science is remaining open to what may be. Essentially, science is agnostic. The facts are the facts. No agenda should limit discovery.
Unfortunately, Christians by & large, know not the language of Prophesy (Grace) & Prideful "scientists" fight like children over their own misunderstandings.
likwidshoe 4 months ago
Many believers of "science" color their view of being "logical" behind a disgust that limits sight & puts the mind behind a vaile of confusion. BeLIEvers trumpet false "science" that turns the scientific method upside down by setting limits of observation during the observation & discovery phase ironically enough. Self congratulations are had while mocking the picture book known as The Bible because they ridiculously took it literally. "SCIENCE" is often championed by those who know it not.
likwidshoe 4 months ago
Many believers of "science" color their view of being "logical" behind a disgust that limits sight & puts the mind behind a vaile of confusion. BeLIEvers trumpet false "science" that turns the scientific method upside down by setting limits of observation during the observation and discovery phase ironically enough. Self congratulations are had while mocking the picture book known as The Bible because they ridiculously took it literally. "SCIENCE" is often championed by those who know it not.
likwidshoe 4 months ago
I love that this is the top result for creation science.
scottyelf 4 months ago
Creationism is the funniest fairy tale ever.
soadpwnsyou 4 months ago in playlist Atheism Songs
rkyeun 4 months ago
@helenchedar, because there isn't now and never has been any evidence whatsoever of a "God." Science deals in observations of the natural world. Religion simply isn't relevant.
janisbmom23 4 months ago
Nice.
jeffreydebra1 4 months ago
Why can't people believe that evolution was caused by god? That would solve a lot of problems.
helencheddar 4 months ago
@helencheddar Because there's no evidence that even remotely suggests that. If there were, then it would be, but science is the observation of phenomenal through natural causes.
PullyElbow27 4 months ago
@helencheddar There is no such thing as belief in science.
adamchrome 4 months ago
@adamchrome a belief is an opinion that something is true. In many people's opinions, science is true, therefore science has belief in it. Do you not BELIEVE in scientific facts.
helencheddar 4 months ago
@helencheddar
As long as a belief has evidence going for it (i.e: NOT faith), then it's science.
Most theists nowadays believe that god guided evolution (Over 99% of the scientific community, as far as biology majors go, accepts evolution, yet 51% believes in a god in some form)
Most creationists are against this, because it goes against their version of a holy book (quran, bible, torah and ,to a lesser extent, baghavad gita).
Xgya2000 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@adamchrome a belief is an opinion that something is true. In many people's opinions, science is true, therefore science has belief in it. Do you not BELIEVE in scientific facts.
helencheddar 4 months ago
@helencheddar Not in the same way, no. If I scientific fact, or even a scientific theory, is proven to be false then I will no longer think that it is true... If something fundamental to natural law like electromagnetism was discovered to be something other than what it is, there would need to be plenty of evidence to do so but provided that there is, then science will change. Science always changes and there is no 'belief'. There is logic and reason.
adamchrome 4 months ago
@adamchrome
There is belief in everything.
I guess what you wanted to say is "There is no such thing as faith (belief without evidence) in science"
Xgya2000 4 months ago
@Xgya2000 Clearly I meant 'belief' as in faith, as that's the way in with the original comment was proposing it. 'Believe' that god started evolution? That is not how science works at all. No rationalist would say that they 'believe' something on faith (which is how religion works... there is no evidence-based argument that doesn't fall either outside of personal experience or unless you assume that the diety exists in the first place).
adamchrome 4 months ago
creationism- the belief in a God who gives all apes and humans vitamin C genes which he then switched off and turns into unusable pseudogenes. A god who sticks vestigal legs on whales for shits and giggles, and gives ostriches hollow bones even though they don't fly. They're notion of God is insane.... but then, what else is new?
JuniusFaction 4 months ago 25
@JuniusFaction Well said, the fucked up part is that they're explanation for those observations is that God just did it and we don't understand why. lol
Krooksbane 3 months ago
I LOVE YOU! ♥
N0tsaved 4 months ago
I don't understand the resistance to accepting evolution. It's a beautiful explanation to how we got here. It also tells us life is constantly evolving, we're always moving, changing, growing.
Zerafinel 4 months ago 20
@Zerafinel You don't understand? Seriously? It completely negates the necessity of a deity to explain the existence of life. It fucks up the minds of religious people.
MrBretowsky 3 months ago in playlist Roy
@MrBretowsky Well, you know, in Europe every* believer is fine with evolution, even the catholic cult. (*except for some muslim immigrants). But don't ask them where original sin then comes from when not from Adam....
SeltsamerAttraktor 3 months ago
@Zerafinel the resistance is because it is a direct contradiction against the literal explanation of the Bible. Only religious people have a problem against evolution, I've yet to meet an atheist who is against evolution.
Casshyr 3 months ago
@Casshyr Actually there are a number of evolutionists who start to look at the quack science behind it then later become Christians. Evolution survives only because of a naturalistic precondition. The math underlying evolution is utterly impossible. Evolution is a religion - a modern day creation myth. Have a look at the DNA video on my channel. Cheers!
alyosha24601 3 months ago
@alyosha24601 still, based on last time i check, over 99% of scientists believe in evolution, and the proportion of theistic evolutionists are climbing. Creationists, on the other hand, are declining, from 45% in 2005 to 40% in 2009. I haven't check the latest 2011 results yet, but i'm sure it's even lower.
Casshyr 3 months ago
@Casshyr I think about 70%(?) of scientists believe in evolution. Of course almost no scientist can aggressively question it, as they'll lose careers and the ability to publish. As one Chinese paleontologist said last year: "In my country you can criticize Darwin but not the government, in America you can criticize the government but not Darwin." As for me, I am happy to ignore the Bible. The science alone is enough to devastate the evolution religion. We observe DNA degrading, not evolving.
alyosha24601 3 months ago
@alyosha24601 "We observe DNA degrading, not evolving." => are you denying micro-evolution as well then?
Casshyr 3 months ago
@Casshyr No, micro-evolution (misnamed) does occur. But micro-evolution cannot be used as evidence for evolution as adaptation occurs by removing information, not creating it. When Napoleon got all the tall Frenchmen killed in Russia, France became short. That's not evolution. All dog breeds were created in the last 400 years. They were bred intentionally by removing unwanted traits. Otherwise we're actually saying new genetic material was created in 400 years? Evolution is quack science.
alyosha24601 3 months ago
@Casshyr (Part I:) No, "micro-evolution" does occur. Such adaptations are used as "proof" of evolution but this is dishonest as micro-e is *removing* information, not creating it. It's a bait 'n switch! When peppered moths switch color or finches change beak size it's a temporary adaptation (both have returned to the prior condition. They don't tell you that!) All 400 dog breeds have been produced since 1500 (?). People did it by selecting the traits they wanted, (cont)
alyosha24601 3 months ago
@Casshyr (cont from below) ...undesirable traits were deliberately selected out - information removed. Otherwise we are faced with claiming that 400 new creatures "evolved" in just 500 years! If that were the case, don't you think there would be some mutant pooches along the way, considering deleterious mutations outnumber beneficial ones in the lab 1 million to one? See my channel: "The Degeneration of DNA: Mutation Rates Invalidate "Evolution" " Evolution is a religion, it's "science-free".
alyosha24601 3 months ago
@alyosha24601 1. Look up the definition of religion, your clearly confused.
2. I'm not even going to begin to tell you all that's wrong with what you just said. Impossible in under 500 characters. Let's for argument's sake say that evolution is wrong. You still have yet to prove creationism. You try to poke these tiny holes in evolution and fail, yet you still have no basis for saying we were created from dirt and a rib then incestuously populated the Earth. Go ahead, I'm listening.
JAB63096 3 months ago
@JAB63096 Look, I'm not your enemy, and I'm not stupid either. Creation is quite self-consistent if you just change your frame of reference from man to God. Once that is done, you can follow the science without a naturalistic precondition. Let's look at this issue: Sexual reproduction. How could this possibly begin? There have to be many millions of perfectly corresponding mutations, none recessive, occur in two creatures at once, they find each other - all in ONE GENERATION!! This is impossible
alyosha24601 3 months ago
@alyosha24601 You need to learn the difference between impossible and improbable. Out of millions of years and generations, probability would dictate that that would happen at least once. Still, you are trying to disprove evolution. Pretend evolution never even existed. Now prove creation.
JAB63096 3 months ago
@JAB63096 Not improbable. An event that requires a six digit exponent can NEVER occur, much less in a 4 billion year blink of an eye. Your chance of picking a single electron in the universe has a two digit exponent - but even that impossible event is a number followed by 299,920 zeroes more likely to happen than the spontaneous creation of a living cell, or "spontaneous split to sexual reproduction" . You have the freedom to curse God, use it - but creation is a mathematical fact. God is real.
alyosha24601 3 months ago
@alyosha24601 Incredibly incomplete thought. You filled in the numerator, then left out the denominator. An event might only happen one in a million times, yet given 100 million opportunities it will happen roughly 100 times. With the size of our universe, a planet with all of the correct conditions is more than probable for what occurred on Earth, to occur.
JAB63096 3 months ago
@alyosha24601 I'm not sure how you pulled that number out of your ass but it sounds like you’re under the impression that sexual reproduction was the result of an entire generation of multicellular eukaryotic organisms undergoing millions of simultaneous mutations that all happened to be beneficial for the occurrence of sexual reproduction.
Evolution does not work like it does in Pokémon, Cats don’t evolve into dogs, monkeys don’t evolve into humans and species don’t spontaneously grow penises.
094250001 3 months ago
@alyosha24601 There are several theories as to how sexual reproduction started that you can read up on but first of all you’re going to need to understand that the jump from asexual reproduction and sexual reproduction isn’t black and white. It would have involved numerous generations of single celled organisms undergoing some sort of cell to cell fusion as a result of an external stressor which would have eventually resulted in the mixing of genes and a meiosis like process occuring.
094250001 3 months ago
@alyosha24601 Consistent Creationism? you kidding? theres the Fon creation myth, Kaang creation,
Kintu creation, Mandé creation, Mbombo creation, Ngai creation, Unkulunkulu creation, Yoruba creation, Coatlicue, Mayan creation, Popol Vuh, Anishinaabeg creation, Cherokee creation, Choctaw creation, Creek creation, Hopi creation, Kuterastan, Diné Bahaneʼ, Zuni creation,Ancient Egyptian creation, Genesis creation, Islamic creation, Sumerian creation and thats just a few that I had room to name.
094250001 3 months ago
@Casshyr (your numbers are closer to the actual numbers than the ones he threw out. Just sayin'.)
JAB63096 3 months ago
"you are just beginning to educate yourself when you shun evoultion"
couldn't have put it better myself. thank you
peterjsege 4 months ago
There are quite a few arguments going on in here. Both sides need to approach this just like any other argument. You need to see the oppositions side and if you're going to win you better know it pretty darn well. It would help to know some facts about your subject matter. Facts are just that. Facts. They do not lean left or right they are only facts. You cannot use opinion as fact. That never wins. If you have some evidence that would be real handy as well.
Good luck campers!
pchtermino1 4 months ago
Now arma-get your homework done. lmao
LordBizarre112233 5 months ago
Christians already have the proof of gods non-existence: It's the same as their proof that all the other gods and mythical beings don't exist.
FHomeBrew 5 months ago
I like how he's actually good at guitar, haha.
MistahCamblinSir 5 months ago
i wanna be in this guys class.
thenotliving666 5 months ago
When comedy is made of the political extremist clowns, isn't that like a double negative? Which would therefore result in a positive? Religious fundamentalist extremism is terrorizing and inegalitarian by nature, no matter which religion mankind decides to fall headfirst into and use as a weapon upon others!
whosrunningthisplace 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What does atheism tell young people in Britain riots = you are an animal - a pig sitting around on your XBOX with no sense of respect, values, or hard work ethic = lawlessness, islam and godless youths.
Thechristiancullen 5 months ago
Brilliant. The CS ppl will watch this and say hooray,
that Zimmerman fella is one of "us" & not one
of "them" infidels. The rest of us will see it & laugh at
"them" & know that the internet will turn "them" into
"us" but we won't be laughing if they make that
Bircher fella Gov Perry of Tehas into Pres. Perry in the mean time.
Perry Bachmann in 2012,-(
danger0usknowledge 5 months ago
Awesome !!!! Best thing I have seen on YouTube lately !
alvarovirtual 5 months ago
1,550 people are just plain over-sexed.
mindlessdrone1991 6 months ago
Arma-ged-your-homework-done. You are KILLING me here!
randomsilliness1 6 months ago
I fucking love him<3
garrettdw2 6 months ago
Now Armaget your homework done!
Aphradonis 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@creationistroll
why would i believe in your religious creationism, if you can't explain AB resistance or Plant speciation without using evolution theory?
transtlantic 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@WildCatsKitten1
why would i believe in your religious creationism, if you can't explain AB resistance or Plant speciation without using evolution theory?
transtlantic 7 months ago
wwwdot666BlackSundotcom
wwwdotExposingChristianitydotom
GahdeMalprigi1488x 7 months ago
i love the guy that knows what "scientology" is and laughs immediately
STLshark2013 7 months ago 33
TheDarkLordLucifer 7 months ago
@TheDarkLordLucifer Wow, when I was a satanist I would say your correct. Then I looked deeper into "religion and noticed it's all bullshit. :DD
garrettdw2 6 months ago
@garrettdw2 Same here. I went from Christianity to Satanism, and didn't like either. I started studying physics and eventually decided it was all BS. FYI, true Satanists don't worship Satan. Those people are called pseudo-satanists, and they're classified as a cult, not a religion. Satanists believe that the strong will inherit the Earth, the weak don't deserve it. Being a LaVeyan Satanist is a bit of an egotistical view, but a very nice one for Evolutionists. Their deadly sins are quite a read.
Fragacide 6 months ago
@Fragacide Yeah, I tried learning physics on my own(Only 16 going into Alegbra 2). I was like, damn....This is hard. Idk, I've always loved physics for some reason.
garrettdw2 6 months ago
@Fragacide 'Scuse... how's LaVeyan Satanism good for evolutionists?
Dan7Bow 6 months ago