There will be no contest but a one sided victory. The level of technology of Star Trek is far superior to the best of Star Wars. If in a campaign the Empirer will surely fall the the Federation. A couple Transphasic or quantum torpedoes will distroy the most powerful death star.
Okay I think its retarded that it didn't even give the chance for the starwars ship to fight back... it would of destroyed startrek... I love startrek but this was a terrible fight... that wasn't even accurate..
@whitemanwii Dude, Star Trek technology, especially late TNG technology was far more advanced than Star Wars. It was only the scale of Star Wars ships that gave them any real power, like needing to build a device the size of a moon to destroy a planet.
i enjoy these videos so much....but i love the comments even more...the way ppl think that you are for star wars. or for star trek.....and god for bid if you watch a video that shows your scifi film world lose....well turns out i may be the only person in the whole world that enjoy good films/movies so i enjoy both. but i just lol when they try and to compair one fictional tech, with another fictional tech...
@onlypeaceindeath I knew it was based upon Dune! What an amaizing book, I'm reading it right now! Oh, and there's a quote from George Lucas in the first page: "Without Dune, Star Wars would have never existed."
@nadohawk So can Star Wars, besides inducing a supernova isn't that impressive since they would need to actually get to their target, and cannot use this against starships in deep space. Considering how slow Warp Drive is the only real use they could have for it is a poisoning of the wells strategy.
Picard would have followed the Prime Directive and not mindlessly attacked like that, and if the Emperor were to engage the Confederation it wouldnt be lightly, he'd plan some devious evil plot that would take them completely by surprise
All the Q-obsessed-fanwhores should realize that the Q are interested in humanity itself, not the government. The Empire is human. So the Q wouldnt give a crap whether the Empire or Federation won.
@elwat5 That is not entirely accurate. Trek ships move faster because they are smaller. The length of a federation sovereign class ship(like the Enterprise-E) reached around 700 meters. A star destroyer's length can reach over 3,000 meters(hence they are slower). And Federation tech is a bit inferior as well. A 25 isoton photon torpedo detonates with 64 megatons of force, while a quad turbolasers from the Clone Wars Era are rated at 200 gigatons with a single shot.
The federation has temporal weapons and that means Starwars are like a kid with a rock tring to take down a B-2 Bomber ... SW can't do shit vs temporal weapons.
@ISSFIPhoenix And yet, ST have mostly weaker weapons, shields, engines, inferior FTL travel and communication. Sensors can be blocked by most funky forms of radiation or materials. How can that make them more superior in technology? Besides, the Death Star II is pretty much proof that the Empire have access to replicator/rapid-fabrication technology. And who wants transporters when pretty much the slightest interferance can render it useless.
@ISSFIPhoenix Imperials have Replicators both for food and industrial, hell they have Replicators on such a scale unheard of in the Federation, even capable of replicating things like Neutronium (otherwise they wouldn't be able to Replicate ships worth replicating)
@ISSFIPhoenix it is not superior. the transporters. sure. but star wars is more superior their ships are faster weapons are stronger and the dont wear tight little space suits that even further questions their sexuality. star wars is more creative far more diverse and out numbers ST
@Sismiques Federation isn't very advanced by imperial standards, the Transporters are easily thwarted by dense materials, shields and electromagnetic interference. And to be fair Stormtrooper suits at least have plating so it doesn't make them look like they are wearing a unitard.
@Perion Teleportation is something so technologically advanced that it's almost unrealistic that they have it in Star Trek; especially considering how it works there: they don't even need pods or capsules to teleport objects, they just need to lock on something anywhere in space. That's impressive, no matter how useless or easily countered in battle. I think a technology like that would be too much even for a GE-like civilization.
@Perion Ignoring Non-canon: Blaster weapons cannot penetrate "magnetic seals" or "ray shields" at all. Starfleet Shields are both. Not to mention, the old Enterprise can destroy cities with just it's phasers, (torpedoes are more powerful) and can level an M-class planet's surface, as per the Original Series episodes "Mirror, Mirror", and "A Taste of Armageddon". The old Enterprise is 86 years old in Trek time, making it the OUTDATED MODEL. Also, the "unitard" thing was uncalled for.
@Perion Stormtrooper uniforms have as many weaknesses as they do advantages. The protection they have will only protect them from a reflected shot, not a direct hit. One disadvantage they have is vision. Their eye pieces were only designed to protect them from the flash of weapons fire. The troops suffer in the field.
@Sismiques The Jedi would deal with V'ger in a heart beat. all it took was telepathy, and the jedi don't have to touch the thing like the Vulcans do. The Empire would just blow it up with the death star.
@monokhem Not true. Spock said V'ger had 12th power energy. That alone would tell me that the Death Star wouldn't even get a shot off. Plus, if you will remember the movie, Spock saw planets, stars, whole solar systems when he went through the portal to mind meld with V'ger. The Death Star wouldn't have a chance.
I think if Star Trek and Star Wars were to actually fight each other, it would be a pretty harsh fight but I say that Trek AT LEAST has a fighting chance.
Clearly i am going to get trolled for saying this but, Star trek was made BEFORE star wars, That left room for them to say everything they had was 20 times as powerfull as federation tech. As an example, The enterprise can travel at warp speed. Star wars come ans said that NOTHING was faster then light speed, In reality it would take YEARS traveling at light speed to get to the nearest star, Im not picking one side or the other but Warp is seen as basicly foding space and traveling over it.
@jabathehutt5555 uh, Star Wars has Faster than Light, the term "Lightspeed" in Star Wars is a slang or extremely general term for "FTL" We see them cross tens or even hundreds of thousands of Light years in a single film.
I don't think Star Wars figures are high to compete with anything, to think otherwise is to subscribe to some form of conspiracy theory which is just plain loony.
guess Starwars would pwn Startrek in longterm Battle cause of a more intense Millitary fighting style and way bigger ships (eclipse class at 19kilometers eg.) and overall more firepower. Also Startrek misses some realy reliable infintary or other landforces. Also Warp is a bit slow it seems but Startrek would put up a good fight thanks to way better Shield Techs hmm thinking about it would go as far as to say they could never win but also never lose
"Way better Shield Tech" uh, you realize that Imperial ship shields can withstand a full half hour's bombardment from another ship of the same type, and their ships can carry upwards of (and beyond) 60 million times the firepower of the Enterprise D.
@Blutwind How could they have better shield technology when they don't even dare to move into calm fields of slow moving rocks when Star Destroyers can charge right into the huge and violent Hoth asteroid belt with barely any losses? That's a good indication on how strong Star Wars shields are against physical impacts. Hell, even smaller Star Wars ships can survive without shields around Stars without any problem.
@JAGTHEGEMINI So that is why Star Wars can travel through the galaxy in matter of hours, build moon sized battle stations that can blow planets up, treat heavy injuries by giving the victim a soak, instant communication through the entire galaxy etc.
@DarthVenomis Well, ok, the Priors are limited, but the Ori are godlike, I think their powers are comparable to those of the Siths. Anyway, I don't like this idea of magic going beyond whatever technology can do. It's like barbarism beating civilization. I'd like SW's setting more if there could be some kind of scientific way for normal people to stand against Force-sensitives.
@MorteIncarnata Ysalamiri and various kinds of drugs could do the trick against MOST Force-sensitives. However, I'm talking about ancient Sith Lords here - many of which were 'wounds in the Force' that killed those around them by merely existing. These Sith could kill off entire star systems and all that dwelled within with their powers. The Ori spent their time sitting doing nothing in a temple. An ancient Sith could just go up there and Force drain them into oblivion.
@DarthVenomis The Ori and the Ancients are immaterial beings. The Ori reside on another galaxy and use the Priors as gateways to extend their power to the Milky Way. That is because the Ancients, who protect our galaxy, are blocking them. If there were no Ancients, the Ori wouldn't need Priors, ships or any kind of technology to conquer the Milky Way. They'd be like the Q's from Star Trek.
@MorteIncarnata I know all about the Ori and the Ancients. :P That said, the Ori remain in their temple, whereas Sith spirit-wraiths a la Nihilus can go anywhere, and kill off worlds... with a thought. Again, this is Star Trek vs. Star Wars, though, not Stargate, so I'm not sure how exactly the Ori are relevant. The truth is a bunch of humans with advanced technology just couldn't stand up to the power of the Force, to the power of ancient Sith magic.
@MorteIncarnata So if the Enterprise came near the Ravager, for example, the Enterprise would lose. Why? No technological terror is a match for the Force, as Vader said. An ancient Sith Lord standing on the Ravager could kill the crew of the Enterprise instantly, and there would be no defense against it... heck, even if the Enterprise's crew were powerful Force users, they couldn't stop it, for Force Drain is a power against which there is NO Force defense. Star Wars wins.
@DarthVenomis I see the "Star Wars wins" part is very important for you. Anyway, how did these Sith Lords die in the end? Did someone defeat them? Did they die of old age? I'm curious.
@Duotwk Right, Sith Lords kill each other all the time! But why were ancient Sith more powerful than the modern ones? Did less powerful Siths manage to kill more poweful ones through trickery or something like that?
@MorteIncarnata no its because a sith named Darth Bane thought it would be great if there were only 2 sith at a time, so he destroyed all the sith holocrons & texts, meaning that future sith couldnt learn the powers of the older ones
@Exile499 Ahhh yes I remember reading of a guy who came up with this idea of 2 siths at a time. Doesn't seem to make much sense to me, but I guess the Dark Side makes people more egocentric and power-hungry, so they're hard to control and organize in large groups.
@Exile499 what, no, wtf are you talking about, he killed all the current sith, he didnt do anything to the holocrons, in fact he created his own, stop giving false information
@MorteIncarnata The sith were usually beaten by Darth Revan when he turned to the light - again. Or the Jedi Exile, who was a wound in the force, when Nihillus stood on the Ravenger and tried to force drain the planet Telos, he firstly tried to kill the exile, but just feasted purely on nothing - yet everything, which weakened him, then he got sabered, sabers work well in A LOT of scenarios :P
@MorteIncarnata Sith Lords are defeated by their apprentice(sometimes in their sleep)who takes over the Sith master role. They then start training a new apprentice.
@MorteIncarnata In the stories the Sith never die. They always dissapear but they never die. So long as the darkside is inside everyone. Luke in the events after Return of the Jedi turns to the darkside.
Then Q shows up, snaps his fingers, and all Sith, Jedi, their friends, and their starships hang from our Christmas trees, totally harmless. Star Trek wins.
@finalfrontier1701 Star Trek definately wins. With people like Charlie X, Q, Borg, and others, along with the Vulcan Nerve Pinch thing, they can't lose. Plus, there is the entire Q continuum, which means hundreds of Q. That beats the Force, the Death Star, and ANY starcruiser. Star trek has beaming from one place to another, Star Wars still has to travel in a spaceship. Star Trek is centuries from now, and Star Wars is "a long time ago".
Charlie X and Q wouldn't care, so they are a non factor.
Vulcan Nerve Pinch requires physical contact, kindof hard to do when you've got a burning hole in your chest from a blaster.
Trek Transporters are unreliable and easily blocked, and the largest ship in the federation that can land is Voyager, and even it has trouble, meanwhile the Executor's sister ship could tear it's way out from under a mountain without concern.
@aprillo considering Q has never helped them when faced with other groups that's not going to happen.
Only reason he helped them against the Borg the first time was because he introduced them, and then only because Picard admitted he was wrong about being ready to face whatever was out there.
Well the last time humanity was about to be destroyed why has the Q intervene ? Now add to this the fact that there is a HUMAN Q(well more or less his parents where Q but she was born and raised in the federation) and then think what would happen ...
Q can snap his fingers and destroy all the StarWars reality.
@finalfrontier1701 Thank You! How can you debate the strength of these two Universes without talking about Q? There is no way around it, the Continuum wins.
@DarthVenomis Actally, one would have to be in the others universe. If the Sith came into the Star Trek universe, the force wouldn't even work, because the Star Trek World is realistic.
Star Wars universe vs. Star Trek universe? Star Wars wins. What good are Star Trek energy weapons if Darth Nihilus instantly drains and consumes their life force? There is NO defense against that Force technique either. Some Sith Lords could blow up stars using the Force. Some could survive as undying wraith-like spirits after death! Star Wars WINS.
@MorteIncarnata First off, that's Stargate, not Star Trek, and, no, Sith are far more powerful. They ARE more advanced than the futuristic humans you speak of, and many could destroy entire worlds with their dark side hunger alone. The Priors had to engineer plagues and use technology to create black holes and so on to do that; the ancient Sith could just drain an entire planet, and even ignite clusters of stars, aside from their talismans which had various effects; invulnerability for example.
Nice vid. And for all those who are fighting over SW and ST, even those of SW are forgetting the other Imperial superweapons-Galaxy Gun, Sun Crusher, World Devastator, Imperium Class Ultra Star Destroyer (never built though). And on the side of SW, compare the sizes and numbers of ships. The Empire had Imperial (II) Class Star destroyers as their main ships, almost replacing the Victory (II) Class Star Destroyers. And they had at least 10 Executor Class SSDs, two Eclipse SSDs, and the Sovereign.
I bring a message to all hate what YouTube is becoming. I hate the new appearance of the viewing system, I hate the reorientation of the video selection, comments, and description system, and most importantly, I hate the new rating system. I will spread this message everywhere until the designers of YouTube will concede with my complaints and restore it all
Well to be realistic, the only thing in Star Trek that would put up a good fight would be the Borg, maybe Species 4872. The Q is simply rigged and no force in any film/tv show could stop them. But if the Star Wars weapons could overpower the Borg shields (pretty sure no Borg ship has had to go up against a Death Star),Star Wars would win in a battle.
As for there being "hundreds of millions" Borg Cubes, in the SW Clone Wars, the CIS built 4 quintillion battle droids,So the scale of SW is big too
@Chessbama Yeah umm, don't believe any lies the Starwars fans say. Over 80% of their facts are complete lies. Hint: when they bring up megatons they have no idea what they're talking about.
One second they say explosive megatons, the next it's megatons of Energy. They are lying.
@MorteIncarnata Well... based on observed weapon power... SW would win hands down. As to the MMOs... STO is a fun game and I really enjoy it. But considering that BioWare is making SW's MMO (not gonna be out till next year I think) ya just know that it's gonna kick-ass :) Bioware just makes awesome games and their Knights of the Old Republic and Mass Effect proves it :) I have a feeling that TOR (The Old Replublic) is going to redefine MMOs :D
the SW ships Don't use lasers they use tibana gas so its not lasers its plasma oh and the transporter can not go through sheilds ether, besides the SD is 1 mile long and 650m wide its way bigger and has more power than any ST ship.
@Starkiller22475 Actually the Borg cube is 2 miles in diameter and would probably assimilate the technology rendering SW weapons useless. And go ahead, use you're Tabana gas as much as you want, the Borg still have several hundred million cubes lined up to replace the one you destroyed.
I see the warsies are at it again. the ISD firepower estimates are based on numerous fallacies and it's futile to attempt a technical debate on youtube
@YourSisterIsMyWhore right... next thing you'll be saying is that a ST ship can withstand a blast from the Death Star... you moron... try learning about what lasers actually are and then compare them against what we see ONSCREEN. You can call an bazooka a 'gun' but it doesn't mean it shoots little bullets.
As for trasporting... ever hear of shields or jamming?
You know, I just Created an account Today, interesting thing, out of Boredom today I was looking at these Videos and see the same People on many of them in related Videos Just Bad Mouthing anyone who is opposed to them and their point of Views, This is interesting, all Hot and Bothered over Fictitious encounters, using all kinds of Technical Manuals to bolster their position.
Fascinating, why one would waste their time doing this is beyond me. People need to stop wasting time and think of Jesus
Trek Obviously would win, One thing Not mentioned is that a federation ship would easily defeat an Empire ship by use of it's Transporters, Something the Empire does not have, One Phton beamed onto the engine room and it's over, Or ? Just beam the entire crew out into Space
First off, the Galactic Empire employs shields on all their ships that will halt transporters, and they are of a far more advanced variety than that of which Star Trek possesses. When is the last time that we saw planetary shields in Trek, or a shield that could stand the pummeling of an exploding planet from 75.000 km away?
Second, the Feds must acquire a lock through heavy jamming which the Imps constantly use in battle.
Third, the Empire will crush the Feds utterly for so many reasons.
Star Trek would PWN the Star Wars universe. What no one understands is that Star Trek EVOLVED from lasers. In fact, in one TNG episode, A ship used lasers against a Federation vessel. The lasers bounced off and actually DAMAGED the ship firing. And also Star Wars has very primitive society. If we invaded, they would be so unorganized, we would destroy each planet at once. And finally, the Borg can adapt to any weapon thrown at them. Even the death star would only work once
uuuum, you obviously don't know what you are talking about.
Star Wars ships are able to cross the entire galaxy in a day and can communicate with ships over 100,000ly from them in real time, Star Trek ships take decades to travel across their galaxy and have a very limited communications range
Star Wars ships call their weapons lasers because thousands of years before they did use them and the term stuck (as of even KOTOR they don't use lasers, but they still use the word.)
Borg cannot adapt to every weapon thrown at them, here's a shortlist of weapons they could never adapt to.
Solar Flares (Star Wars Turbolasers are effectively weaponized and concentrated Solar flares with even greater firepower than the one that destroyed a borg ship)
Ion Storms (again, Star Wars use Weaponized Ion Storms with far greater power)
8472 beams
Knives
Guns
Borg Adaptation is not absolute, nor is it some kind of comic book superpower, it has limits and the Empire is far beyond them.
Ah haha, i get it. Green explosions = green screen. Makes it easier to take out the gray/blackish borg hull.and place a StarWars ship behind it. Clever.
Their maneuverability is low but their straightline acceleration is huge, about twice that of an Impulse engine, their sensors have a minimum range and blind spots close to the hull, but they have a huge maximum range.
Also the advantages they have make such things as low relative maneuverability and minimum range sensors, meaningless trivia.
also an ISD is about the same maneuverability (and larger) as a Jem'hadar Battleship from the episode "Valiant". a Galaxy Class ship isn't much better.
SW tech follows the rule of adding a boatload of zeros to the end of power values, resulting in ludicrous things like hyperspace speeds of millions of times the speed of light just to explain throwaway lines like "they must be halfway across the galaxy by now"
ST tech follows the rule of technobabble and last second out of the ass jury-rigged BS of the sort that would make even MacGyver blush
It's actually rather probable that they couldn't have detected the Falcon. Consider; it hid itself in the blind spot of the destroyer's sensors, and also by choosing to hide itself so close to the reactor and engine quadrants of the larger ship which would be producing large amounts of stray EM interference, it could remain undetected by any other sister ships within Vader's squadron.
Hm i like both O.o star trek a little more though but thats because of the quantity i mean there are like 7 starwars movies (including the animated one) and a couple of comics while startrek has like what 12 movies? + a couple of tv series and a couple of comics (dont read or watch the comics though :D)
yes, but look at the merchandising that star wars has in comparison with star trek, and also, each one of the star wars movies has been labeled one of the greatest movies of our time, wheras most of the star trek movies, although good, have sort of been put down as a good movie and then safely stored away on the back row of a rental stores sci-fi section, its all about quality, not quantity my friend
In a power vrs power match, SW beats ST, as the writers of the SW tech books made sure their numbers are higher. Their respective techs are completely different in design, and ST has several unique tech advantages:
FTL weapons - ST ships routinely use their weapons and transporters in warp, and I remember several TNG episodes where they specifically used FTL torpedoes. They can easily manuver in warp, and have sensors that work in warp. SW ships in Hyperspace fly blind in a straight line.
actually that's not necessarily true, in Hyperspace they can make course corrections according to "The Clone Wars" and they can use communications with other ships as well,
also FTL weapons are only useful up against other ships flying at FTL,
the writers of the SW tech books did not "make sure their numbers were higher than Star Trek" they simply worked to figure out what it would take to achieve the sorts of things that occur in the films and EU, Trek didn't even enter many of their minds.
They're movies dude... I think you need to spend more time in reality rather than escaping into your little fantasy world. Get a life and stop obsessing over things that dont matter. Seriously!
Fan of both but a bigger fan of SW. That being said, ST had the superior tech. The millenium falcon is the fastest ship the rebels have and it barely does light, no contest for a warp drive. The transporter matter conversion technology pawns anything tech wise that SW has. Without the force, SW would get beaten badly. As for SW shields being better, they can't even stop a single seat fighter from making a kamikaze run and taking out the entire bridge. Dyson Sphere>Death Star.
um, the shields were down by the way, Transporters can be blocked by all sorts of things, shields, funny ore, 20th century power lines, radioactive interference, inhibitors the size of a camera tripod, tractor beams etc.
"the 0.5 past lightspeed" statement means that his FTL drive is rated as a class 0.5, and as seen on screen, routinely makes trips that even Slipstream can only dream of.
the Dyson Sphere and Star Destroyers are made out of similar materials, Durasteel is a Neutronium alloy.
in case you didn't notice, the Super Star Destroyer Executor had it's shields knocked out by Admiral Akbar's Mon Cal fleet and as the shields collapsed two A-wings destroyed their port long range sensor dome.
the A-wing also careened
Fun Fact: A-wings are one of the few fighters that have Durasteel fuselages rather than Titanium.
so no, Star Trek does NOT have Superior tech in any way shape or form.
Doesn't anyone know the Star Destroyer is like 1,500 meters long with like 300 cannons on it...?
Along with a super powered radar system (except when finding the Millenium Falcon 2 feet away) and a pretty big fighter escort....
DarkEmperorRay13 5 days ago
Thats all wrong nothing like phasers or photon torpedios will ever penitrate a star distroyer's shields cause it has particle and energy shields.
DarthRevan1177 1 month ago
@DarthRevan1177 Not really, the Enterprise-D drilled through the crust of a planet using one phaser, this would take multipul teratons.
NANOFORGE 2 weeks ago
Technology-wise, Star Trek is ahead.
JAGTHEGEMINI 1 month ago
There will be no contest but a one sided victory. The level of technology of Star Trek is far superior to the best of Star Wars. If in a campaign the Empirer will surely fall the the Federation. A couple Transphasic or quantum torpedoes will distroy the most powerful death star.
jgguitar76 1 month ago
@jgguitar76
I think not.
watch?v=k4mfkw9gV5k
watch?v=YeyjxCubYoc
mechaghostman2 1 month ago
@mechaghostman2 Except thatStar Wars number crunchers lie.
Idazmi7 1 week ago
You misspelled destroy. Therefore Star Wars wins.
Lenwelocked 1 month ago
Star Wars changes its technology whenever a scene requires it...
So the AT-AT`s had a special armour - why didn`t they build the star destroyers or Tie Fighters out of it?!
Star Wars vessels have a shield - But everyone can walk through it?!
SuperJuliusC 2 months ago
Okay I think its retarded that it didn't even give the chance for the starwars ship to fight back... it would of destroyed startrek... I love startrek but this was a terrible fight... that wasn't even accurate..
whitemanwii 4 months ago
@whitemanwii Aw man, it's just a scene from Star Trek with a Borg cube replaced with an ISD. The original Borg cube wasn't shooting either.
MorteIncarnata 4 months ago
@whitemanwii Dude, Star Trek technology, especially late TNG technology was far more advanced than Star Wars. It was only the scale of Star Wars ships that gave them any real power, like needing to build a device the size of a moon to destroy a planet.
stalkingalizee 4 months ago
@whitemanwii
Are you kidding? Star Wars technology is way more advanced than Star Wars.
ThirdRAILKink 3 months ago
@whitemanwii I'm pretty sure it wasn't meant to be serious...
Pyroketox 2 weeks ago
i enjoy these videos so much....but i love the comments even more...the way ppl think that you are for star wars. or for star trek.....and god for bid if you watch a video that shows your scifi film world lose....well turns out i may be the only person in the whole world that enjoy good films/movies so i enjoy both. but i just lol when they try and to compair one fictional tech, with another fictional tech...
1crazyfocker 5 months ago
Okay, who filled the Star Destroyer with green paint?
FleishDawg 6 months ago
I think they would be friends.
calapanpo 7 months ago
@calapanpo that's a great point! :)
AdMaker3000 7 months ago
aww, wish star wars won xD, anyway Awsome video for such simple editing :)
magickingsly 7 months ago
A few sweaty Warsies on here.
kitchenaut 10 months ago
I think star wars is based upon star trek in any way!!!
tzasas1 11 months ago
@tzasas1 It's based upon Flash Gordon and Samurai movies, or that's what i've heard.
onlypeaceindeath 11 months ago
@onlypeaceindeath I knew it was based upon Dune! What an amaizing book, I'm reading it right now! Oh, and there's a quote from George Lucas in the first page: "Without Dune, Star Wars would have never existed."
MorteIncarnata 11 months ago
You may have destroyed one Star Destroyer, but you haven't killed the entire Empire.
FATE522 11 months ago
@FATE522 Star Trek tech can destroy whole planetary systems though.
nadohawk 10 months ago
@nadohawk So can Star Wars, besides inducing a supernova isn't that impressive since they would need to actually get to their target, and cannot use this against starships in deep space. Considering how slow Warp Drive is the only real use they could have for it is a poisoning of the wells strategy.
Perion 6 months ago
Star Trek wins.
ISSFIPhoenix 1 year ago
U can't put the two worlds together as the force won't exist in star trek as st is realistic, but I do like the the outcome of this. GO STAR TREK!!
Riker7392 1 year ago
@finalfrontier1701 Maybe, of course maybe not o.o.
invalid000able 1 year ago
Ah, yes! The classic sci-fi battle! :D
AdMaker3000 1 year ago
Picard would have followed the Prime Directive and not mindlessly attacked like that, and if the Emperor were to engage the Confederation it wouldnt be lightly, he'd plan some devious evil plot that would take them completely by surprise
furfeyl 1 year ago
All the Q-obsessed-fanwhores should realize that the Q are interested in humanity itself, not the government. The Empire is human. So the Q wouldnt give a crap whether the Empire or Federation won.
fajner1 1 year ago
Why wouldn't that have been the Death Star instead of a Star Destroyer?
Technology-wise, Star Trek def has the upper hand, and can definitely move ships around faster.
elwat5 1 year ago
@elwat5 That is not entirely accurate. Trek ships move faster because they are smaller. The length of a federation sovereign class ship(like the Enterprise-E) reached around 700 meters. A star destroyer's length can reach over 3,000 meters(hence they are slower). And Federation tech is a bit inferior as well. A 25 isoton photon torpedo detonates with 64 megatons of force, while a quad turbolasers from the Clone Wars Era are rated at 200 gigatons with a single shot.
ZurBar8 1 year ago
@elwat5 According to Dr. Michio Kaku, the Federation is a Type 2 civilization, the Empire is Type 3, which means the Fed would have ZERO chance.
TonyN737 1 year ago
@TonyN737
The federation has temporal weapons and that means Starwars are like a kid with a rock tring to take down a B-2 Bomber ... SW can't do shit vs temporal weapons.
xxan84 1 year ago
@elwat5 tech wise they most certainly do not
furfeyl 1 year ago
@elwat5 Techwise Star Wars is actually higher, sorry to tell you.
DarkPagan2035 1 year ago
@DarkPagan2035 sorry but its not. Techwise ST is higher, i.e. transporters, replicators, etc... compared to slow shuttle craft, no replicators...
ISSFIPhoenix 1 year ago
@ISSFIPhoenix And yet, ST have mostly weaker weapons, shields, engines, inferior FTL travel and communication. Sensors can be blocked by most funky forms of radiation or materials. How can that make them more superior in technology? Besides, the Death Star II is pretty much proof that the Empire have access to replicator/rapid-fabrication technology. And who wants transporters when pretty much the slightest interferance can render it useless.
onlypeaceindeath 11 months ago
@ISSFIPhoenix Imperials have Replicators both for food and industrial, hell they have Replicators on such a scale unheard of in the Federation, even capable of replicating things like Neutronium (otherwise they wouldn't be able to Replicate ships worth replicating)
Perion 11 months ago
@ISSFIPhoenix it is not superior. the transporters. sure. but star wars is more superior their ships are faster weapons are stronger and the dont wear tight little space suits that even further questions their sexuality. star wars is more creative far more diverse and out numbers ST
1993Conner 10 months ago
@1993Conner
So Imperial Stormtrooper suits aren't tight?
Besides, this is just the Federation here, never mind much more powerful species like V'Ger.
Sismiques 9 months ago
@Sismiques Federation isn't very advanced by imperial standards, the Transporters are easily thwarted by dense materials, shields and electromagnetic interference. And to be fair Stormtrooper suits at least have plating so it doesn't make them look like they are wearing a unitard.
Perion 6 months ago
@Perion Teleportation is something so technologically advanced that it's almost unrealistic that they have it in Star Trek; especially considering how it works there: they don't even need pods or capsules to teleport objects, they just need to lock on something anywhere in space. That's impressive, no matter how useless or easily countered in battle. I think a technology like that would be too much even for a GE-like civilization.
MorteIncarnata 6 months ago
@MorteIncarnata doubtful, but it is rather silly.
Perion 6 months ago
@Perion Ignoring Non-canon: Blaster weapons cannot penetrate "magnetic seals" or "ray shields" at all. Starfleet Shields are both. Not to mention, the old Enterprise can destroy cities with just it's phasers, (torpedoes are more powerful) and can level an M-class planet's surface, as per the Original Series episodes "Mirror, Mirror", and "A Taste of Armageddon". The old Enterprise is 86 years old in Trek time, making it the OUTDATED MODEL. Also, the "unitard" thing was uncalled for.
Idazmi7 4 months ago
@Perion Stormtrooper uniforms have as many weaknesses as they do advantages. The protection they have will only protect them from a reflected shot, not a direct hit. One disadvantage they have is vision. Their eye pieces were only designed to protect them from the flash of weapons fire. The troops suffer in the field.
rpsmith221 3 months ago
@Sismiques The Jedi would deal with V'ger in a heart beat. all it took was telepathy, and the jedi don't have to touch the thing like the Vulcans do. The Empire would just blow it up with the death star.
monokhem 4 months ago
@monokhem V'ger is 82 AU in length. Big as the Solar system.
Idazmi7 4 months ago
@monokhem Not true. Spock said V'ger had 12th power energy. That alone would tell me that the Death Star wouldn't even get a shot off. Plus, if you will remember the movie, Spock saw planets, stars, whole solar systems when he went through the portal to mind meld with V'ger. The Death Star wouldn't have a chance.
rpsmith221 3 months ago
@monokhem The death star has only one main "gun port" aka "that big whole there" - It would be dead in the water...
SuperJuliusC 2 months ago
@1993Conner actually, it's opposite, except for suits and numbers
Picard578 8 months ago
startrek always winz
4dojo 1 year ago
@4dojo lies
furfeyl 1 year ago
I think if Star Trek and Star Wars were to actually fight each other, it would be a pretty harsh fight but I say that Trek AT LEAST has a fighting chance.
Neurotoast 1 year ago
@Neurotoast I used to think so too, but then I read what the firepowers/performance figures were for the respective ships/series.
It can be very surprising.
Perion 1 year ago
Clearly i am going to get trolled for saying this but, Star trek was made BEFORE star wars, That left room for them to say everything they had was 20 times as powerfull as federation tech. As an example, The enterprise can travel at warp speed. Star wars come ans said that NOTHING was faster then light speed, In reality it would take YEARS traveling at light speed to get to the nearest star, Im not picking one side or the other but Warp is seen as basicly foding space and traveling over it.
jabathehutt5555 1 year ago
@jabathehutt5555 uh, Star Wars has Faster than Light, the term "Lightspeed" in Star Wars is a slang or extremely general term for "FTL" We see them cross tens or even hundreds of thousands of Light years in a single film.
I don't think Star Wars figures are high to compete with anything, to think otherwise is to subscribe to some form of conspiracy theory which is just plain loony.
Perion 1 year ago
oh well fanbattle ftw
guess Starwars would pwn Startrek in longterm Battle cause of a more intense Millitary fighting style and way bigger ships (eclipse class at 19kilometers eg.) and overall more firepower. Also Startrek misses some realy reliable infintary or other landforces. Also Warp is a bit slow it seems but Startrek would put up a good fight thanks to way better Shield Techs hmm thinking about it would go as far as to say they could never win but also never lose
Blutwind 1 year ago
"Way better Shield Tech" uh, you realize that Imperial ship shields can withstand a full half hour's bombardment from another ship of the same type, and their ships can carry upwards of (and beyond) 60 million times the firepower of the Enterprise D.
Perion 1 year ago
@Blutwind How could they have better shield technology when they don't even dare to move into calm fields of slow moving rocks when Star Destroyers can charge right into the huge and violent Hoth asteroid belt with barely any losses? That's a good indication on how strong Star Wars shields are against physical impacts. Hell, even smaller Star Wars ships can survive without shields around Stars without any problem.
onlypeaceindeath 1 year ago
Star Wars is inferior to Star Trek technological wise.
JAGTHEGEMINI 1 year ago
@JAGTHEGEMINI So that is why Star Wars can travel through the galaxy in matter of hours, build moon sized battle stations that can blow planets up, treat heavy injuries by giving the victim a soak, instant communication through the entire galaxy etc.
onlypeaceindeath 1 year ago
Comment removed
onlypeaceindeath 1 year ago
ROFL @ the star destroyer appearing out of nowhere & blowing up. I nearly bust my ass laughing. Nicely made. Star Trek PWNS.
QuantumNova 1 year ago
Even by itself.... the Enterprise E would have won this battle!!!!
wabmorgan 1 year ago
@wabmorgan Enterprise would be destroyed before it even noticed the Star Destroyer.
onlypeaceindeath 1 year ago
Nice Video.
Hate to point this out but the force might not work on the ST characters because they are from a different universe where the force doesn't exist.
ISSFIPhoenix 1 year ago
@DarthVenomis Well, ok, the Priors are limited, but the Ori are godlike, I think their powers are comparable to those of the Siths. Anyway, I don't like this idea of magic going beyond whatever technology can do. It's like barbarism beating civilization. I'd like SW's setting more if there could be some kind of scientific way for normal people to stand against Force-sensitives.
MorteIncarnata 1 year ago
@MorteIncarnata Ysalamiri and various kinds of drugs could do the trick against MOST Force-sensitives. However, I'm talking about ancient Sith Lords here - many of which were 'wounds in the Force' that killed those around them by merely existing. These Sith could kill off entire star systems and all that dwelled within with their powers. The Ori spent their time sitting doing nothing in a temple. An ancient Sith could just go up there and Force drain them into oblivion.
DarthVenomis 1 year ago
@DarthVenomis The Ori and the Ancients are immaterial beings. The Ori reside on another galaxy and use the Priors as gateways to extend their power to the Milky Way. That is because the Ancients, who protect our galaxy, are blocking them. If there were no Ancients, the Ori wouldn't need Priors, ships or any kind of technology to conquer the Milky Way. They'd be like the Q's from Star Trek.
MorteIncarnata 1 year ago
@MorteIncarnata I know all about the Ori and the Ancients. :P That said, the Ori remain in their temple, whereas Sith spirit-wraiths a la Nihilus can go anywhere, and kill off worlds... with a thought. Again, this is Star Trek vs. Star Wars, though, not Stargate, so I'm not sure how exactly the Ori are relevant. The truth is a bunch of humans with advanced technology just couldn't stand up to the power of the Force, to the power of ancient Sith magic.
DarthVenomis 1 year ago
@MorteIncarnata So if the Enterprise came near the Ravager, for example, the Enterprise would lose. Why? No technological terror is a match for the Force, as Vader said. An ancient Sith Lord standing on the Ravager could kill the crew of the Enterprise instantly, and there would be no defense against it... heck, even if the Enterprise's crew were powerful Force users, they couldn't stop it, for Force Drain is a power against which there is NO Force defense. Star Wars wins.
DarthVenomis 1 year ago
@DarthVenomis I see the "Star Wars wins" part is very important for you. Anyway, how did these Sith Lords die in the end? Did someone defeat them? Did they die of old age? I'm curious.
MorteIncarnata 1 year ago 7
@MorteIncarnata killed by other sith lords usually
Duotwk 1 year ago
@Duotwk Right, Sith Lords kill each other all the time! But why were ancient Sith more powerful than the modern ones? Did less powerful Siths manage to kill more poweful ones through trickery or something like that?
MorteIncarnata 1 year ago
@MorteIncarnata no its because a sith named Darth Bane thought it would be great if there were only 2 sith at a time, so he destroyed all the sith holocrons & texts, meaning that future sith couldnt learn the powers of the older ones
Exile499 1 year ago
@Exile499 Ahhh yes I remember reading of a guy who came up with this idea of 2 siths at a time. Doesn't seem to make much sense to me, but I guess the Dark Side makes people more egocentric and power-hungry, so they're hard to control and organize in large groups.
MorteIncarnata 1 year ago
@MorteIncarnata Darth Bane, rule of 2
furfeyl 1 year ago
@Exile499 what, no, wtf are you talking about, he killed all the current sith, he didnt do anything to the holocrons, in fact he created his own, stop giving false information
furfeyl 1 year ago
@MorteIncarnata The sith were usually beaten by Darth Revan when he turned to the light - again. Or the Jedi Exile, who was a wound in the force, when Nihillus stood on the Ravenger and tried to force drain the planet Telos, he firstly tried to kill the exile, but just feasted purely on nothing - yet everything, which weakened him, then he got sabered, sabers work well in A LOT of scenarios :P
DarthChess 1 year ago
@MorteIncarnata well sidous was about 80, aand vader couldnt breathe without a respirator... so maybe it was old age...
BlueCloneTrooper521 1 year ago
@MorteIncarnata
In the case of Nihilus, he was killed by the Jedi Exile, who was a wound in the force, making her his one true weakness.
Zorc620 1 year ago
@MorteIncarnata Sith Lords are defeated by their apprentice(sometimes in their sleep)who takes over the Sith master role. They then start training a new apprentice.
riptorn311 1 year ago
@MorteIncarnata what ones? theres far too many who have died to give any one reason lol
furfeyl 1 year ago
@MorteIncarnata In the stories the Sith never die. They always dissapear but they never die. So long as the darkside is inside everyone. Luke in the events after Return of the Jedi turns to the darkside.
LordHannigan 1 year ago
@LordHannigan Yeah I read about a resurrected Emperor corrupting Luke at a certain point.
MorteIncarnata 1 year ago
@DarthVenomis
Then Q shows up, snaps his fingers, and all Sith, Jedi, their friends, and their starships hang from our Christmas trees, totally harmless. Star Trek wins.
finalfrontier1701 1 year ago
@finalfrontier1701 Then the Bedlam spirits comes and restores everything again, and Star Wars wins.
onlypeaceindeath 1 year ago
@finalfrontier1701 Star Trek definately wins. With people like Charlie X, Q, Borg, and others, along with the Vulcan Nerve Pinch thing, they can't lose. Plus, there is the entire Q continuum, which means hundreds of Q. That beats the Force, the Death Star, and ANY starcruiser. Star trek has beaming from one place to another, Star Wars still has to travel in a spaceship. Star Trek is centuries from now, and Star Wars is "a long time ago".
PressALTandF4now 1 year ago
Charlie X and Q wouldn't care, so they are a non factor.
Vulcan Nerve Pinch requires physical contact, kindof hard to do when you've got a burning hole in your chest from a blaster.
Trek Transporters are unreliable and easily blocked, and the largest ship in the federation that can land is Voyager, and even it has trouble, meanwhile the Executor's sister ship could tear it's way out from under a mountain without concern.
Star Wars Civilization is 25,000 years old
The federation is only 300
Perion 1 year ago
@Perion not necessarily. If it was the Enterprise-D fighting the Star Wars people, Q would prob help.
aprillo 1 year ago
@aprillo considering Q has never helped them when faced with other groups that's not going to happen.
Only reason he helped them against the Borg the first time was because he introduced them, and then only because Picard admitted he was wrong about being ready to face whatever was out there.
Such would not be the case with the Empire.
Perion 1 year ago
@finalfrontier1701 q snaps his fingers only to get owned by the emperor.
ztunelover 1 year ago
@ztunelover Well that sounds a little... impossible. But Q's intervention seems also unlikely to me.
MorteIncarnata 1 year ago
@MorteIncarnata
Well the last time humanity was about to be destroyed why has the Q intervene ? Now add to this the fact that there is a HUMAN Q(well more or less his parents where Q but she was born and raised in the federation) and then think what would happen ...
Q can snap his fingers and destroy all the StarWars reality.
xxan84 1 year ago
@finalfrontier1701 including omnipotent figures isnt allowed lol
furfeyl 1 year ago
@finalfrontier1701 Thank You! How can you debate the strength of these two Universes without talking about Q? There is no way around it, the Continuum wins.
AsaphProject 1 year ago
@AsaphProject Star Wars do also have its share of omnipotent beings, so I would say that using the Q's would be pretty much a stalemate.
onlypeaceindeath 1 year ago
@DarthVenomis Yeah but the Q continuum woud PWN all of the siths in one go.
TSMK900 1 year ago
shame Q wouldn't give a crap, and would be too busy laughing and enjoying the show to bother saving anyone.
Perion 1 year ago
@Perion he would have picard watch enterprise blow up thousands of times. so picard lives
fuhrerkingbradley 1 year ago
@DarthVenomis And Q would trump anyone in Star Wars. Star Trek WINS!!!
wabmorgan 1 year ago
No technological terror.... but Q is > the Force. Star Treks WINS!!!!
wabmorgan 1 year ago
@DarthVenomis Actally, one would have to be in the others universe. If the Sith came into the Star Trek universe, the force wouldn't even work, because the Star Trek World is realistic.
aprillo 1 year ago
@DarthVenomis how come this was never used in other Star Warsbattles?
TOK150 1 year ago
Star Wars universe vs. Star Trek universe? Star Wars wins. What good are Star Trek energy weapons if Darth Nihilus instantly drains and consumes their life force? There is NO defense against that Force technique either. Some Sith Lords could blow up stars using the Force. Some could survive as undying wraith-like spirits after death! Star Wars WINS.
DarthVenomis 1 year ago
@DarthVenomis Well, I've seen the SGC defeat the Priors and the Ori... that's something close to having futuristic humans defeat Siths Lords...
MorteIncarnata 1 year ago
@MorteIncarnata First off, that's Stargate, not Star Trek, and, no, Sith are far more powerful. They ARE more advanced than the futuristic humans you speak of, and many could destroy entire worlds with their dark side hunger alone. The Priors had to engineer plagues and use technology to create black holes and so on to do that; the ancient Sith could just drain an entire planet, and even ignite clusters of stars, aside from their talismans which had various effects; invulnerability for example.
DarthVenomis 1 year ago
Nice vid. And for all those who are fighting over SW and ST, even those of SW are forgetting the other Imperial superweapons-Galaxy Gun, Sun Crusher, World Devastator, Imperium Class Ultra Star Destroyer (never built though). And on the side of SW, compare the sizes and numbers of ships. The Empire had Imperial (II) Class Star destroyers as their main ships, almost replacing the Victory (II) Class Star Destroyers. And they had at least 10 Executor Class SSDs, two Eclipse SSDs, and the Sovereign.
SteelGunner4104 1 year ago
I bring a message to all hate what YouTube is becoming. I hate the new appearance of the viewing system, I hate the reorientation of the video selection, comments, and description system, and most importantly, I hate the new rating system. I will spread this message everywhere until the designers of YouTube will concede with my complaints and restore it all
soundmixer6393 1 year ago
Well to be realistic, the only thing in Star Trek that would put up a good fight would be the Borg, maybe Species 4872. The Q is simply rigged and no force in any film/tv show could stop them. But if the Star Wars weapons could overpower the Borg shields (pretty sure no Borg ship has had to go up against a Death Star),Star Wars would win in a battle.
As for there being "hundreds of millions" Borg Cubes, in the SW Clone Wars, the CIS built 4 quintillion battle droids,So the scale of SW is big too
tennispro3782 1 year ago
If a SD can lay down 800 mil megatons in one second all it would take is one sec to destroy a planet.....why build a death star?
Chessbama 1 year ago
@Chessbama Yeah umm, don't believe any lies the Starwars fans say. Over 80% of their facts are complete lies. Hint: when they bring up megatons they have no idea what they're talking about.
One second they say explosive megatons, the next it's megatons of Energy. They are lying.
QuantumNova 1 year ago
damn i gotta say that was awesome that would be so true cuz star wars sux
GB69ER1 1 year ago
@GB69ER1 Lol c'mon it doesn't suk... but like you I think Star Trek is much more interesting than Star Wars.
And I think the new Star Trek MMO is better than the Star Wars one (although I haven't played them).
MorteIncarnata 1 year ago
@MorteIncarnata Well... based on observed weapon power... SW would win hands down. As to the MMOs... STO is a fun game and I really enjoy it. But considering that BioWare is making SW's MMO (not gonna be out till next year I think) ya just know that it's gonna kick-ass :) Bioware just makes awesome games and their Knights of the Old Republic and Mass Effect proves it :) I have a feeling that TOR (The Old Replublic) is going to redefine MMOs :D
ncruhk 1 year ago
why are there multible star trek ships but only one star wars star destroyer
justin162311 1 year ago
the SW ships Don't use lasers they use tibana gas so its not lasers its plasma oh and the transporter can not go through sheilds ether, besides the SD is 1 mile long and 650m wide its way bigger and has more power than any ST ship.
Starkiller22475 1 year ago
@Starkiller22475 Actually the Borg cube is 2 miles in diameter and would probably assimilate the technology rendering SW weapons useless. And go ahead, use you're Tabana gas as much as you want, the Borg still have several hundred million cubes lined up to replace the one you destroyed.
Dms12444 1 year ago
A hundred million cubes for the scrap yard then.
onlypeaceindeath 1 year ago
Even though they're called "Turbo lasers"
lieutenanterrrrrrrr 1 year ago
@Starkiller22475 actually its pure energy.
1993Conner 10 months ago
wow that was cool , someone made the video the right way ,It is so becouse I said so.
erwintipton 1 year ago
I see the warsies are at it again. the ISD firepower estimates are based on numerous fallacies and it's futile to attempt a technical debate on youtube
watcher998 1 year ago
they re all full of so much shit. dont believe them, lasers cant even penetrate navigation deflectors.
and Star Trek can tranport photon torpedoes into a star destroyers reactors.
YourSisterIsMyWhore 1 year ago
@YourSisterIsMyWhore right... next thing you'll be saying is that a ST ship can withstand a blast from the Death Star... you moron... try learning about what lasers actually are and then compare them against what we see ONSCREEN. You can call an bazooka a 'gun' but it doesn't mean it shoots little bullets.
As for trasporting... ever hear of shields or jamming?
ncruhk 1 year ago
ST > SW ships
That is all ^.^
EnigmusBruticus 1 year ago
"ST > SW ships
That is all a lie"
fix'd
Perion 1 year ago
You know, I just Created an account Today, interesting thing, out of Boredom today I was looking at these Videos and see the same People on many of them in related Videos Just Bad Mouthing anyone who is opposed to them and their point of Views, This is interesting, all Hot and Bothered over Fictitious encounters, using all kinds of Technical Manuals to bolster their position.
Fascinating, why one would waste their time doing this is beyond me. People need to stop wasting time and think of Jesus
TheLightning50 2 years ago
I agree.
Except "stop wasting time and think of Jesus". Sounds weird in that context.
MorteIncarnata 2 years ago
Perhaps in some respects But appropriate as This silly Fictional debate accomplishes Nothing, However Keeping your mind on things above
(Col.3:1) Does
slickyboy40 2 years ago
@TheLightning50
You are right. I am a fan of both Star Trek and Star Wars, but the way we (including myself) waste our lives over minutia is pathetic.
Time is precious. Instead of wasting it over fiction and fantasy, we should seek the Truth with all our heart.
Knowledge of the Truth will set us free.
Ignorance of the Truth leads to eternal destruction.
nehru0310 2 years ago
Comment removed
LopperSydney 2 years ago
@TheLightning50
Hello, blowme23/slictyler.
How is the weather today?
ImperatorDerGalaxis 1 year ago
fuck jebus.
marcelthemaoist 1 year ago
please check out my star trek video, it's called star trel meets E.T.
seclairty31 2 years ago
People your comments are becoming increasingly retarded.
MorteIncarnata 2 years ago
Trek Obviously would win, One thing Not mentioned is that a federation ship would easily defeat an Empire ship by use of it's Transporters, Something the Empire does not have, One Phton beamed onto the engine room and it's over, Or ? Just beam the entire crew out into Space
slickyboy40 2 years ago
First off, the Galactic Empire employs shields on all their ships that will halt transporters, and they are of a far more advanced variety than that of which Star Trek possesses. When is the last time that we saw planetary shields in Trek, or a shield that could stand the pummeling of an exploding planet from 75.000 km away?
Second, the Feds must acquire a lock through heavy jamming which the Imps constantly use in battle.
Third, the Empire will crush the Feds utterly for so many reasons.
ImperatorDerGalaxis 2 years ago 2
Damn, someone should just turn off the comments.
Too many asshole getting into arguments over who would win when it was just an experimental video.
SeanConnery9000 2 years ago
You're right lol.
MorteIncarnata 2 years ago
Thanks. You do know that you can remove douchebag comments right?
SeanConnery9000 2 years ago
Star Trek would PWN the Star Wars universe. What no one understands is that Star Trek EVOLVED from lasers. In fact, in one TNG episode, A ship used lasers against a Federation vessel. The lasers bounced off and actually DAMAGED the ship firing. And also Star Wars has very primitive society. If we invaded, they would be so unorganized, we would destroy each planet at once. And finally, the Borg can adapt to any weapon thrown at them. Even the death star would only work once
indianajoneszilla 2 years ago
uuuum, you obviously don't know what you are talking about.
Star Wars ships are able to cross the entire galaxy in a day and can communicate with ships over 100,000ly from them in real time, Star Trek ships take decades to travel across their galaxy and have a very limited communications range
Star Wars ships call their weapons lasers because thousands of years before they did use them and the term stuck (as of even KOTOR they don't use lasers, but they still use the word.)
Perion 2 years ago
Borg cannot adapt to every weapon thrown at them, here's a shortlist of weapons they could never adapt to.
Solar Flares (Star Wars Turbolasers are effectively weaponized and concentrated Solar flares with even greater firepower than the one that destroyed a borg ship)
Ion Storms (again, Star Wars use Weaponized Ion Storms with far greater power)
8472 beams
Knives
Guns
Borg Adaptation is not absolute, nor is it some kind of comic book superpower, it has limits and the Empire is far beyond them.
Perion 2 years ago 2
they were shooting at a borg cube. seriusly make them better.
ingloable 2 years ago
u do better and then u have credible evidence to commit that statement
noobsbane283 2 years ago
star trek sucks ass
Masterjedirebel95 2 years ago
true
524K4LT 2 years ago
This sucks... they were not even shooting at the star destroyer. :)
YaTuberculosis 2 years ago 2
Yeah it show what Star Trek can do!!!
obartt 2 years ago
yeah beat them up.
martinfischer11 2 years ago
Ah haha, i get it. Green explosions = green screen. Makes it easier to take out the gray/blackish borg hull.and place a StarWars ship behind it. Clever.
B8Av3 2 years ago
that isx a borg cube
ingloable 2 years ago
pfft
billhaley1868 2 years ago
All of the numbers for both series are made up almost always by writers who no nothing about physics.
ayanel00 2 years ago
last I checked you had to know a helluva lot about physics in order to get a PHD in it.
Perion 2 years ago
Curtis J. Saxton
Has a PHD in theoretical Astrophysics. So at least the SW writers still have 1 up on the trek writers.
blacksun2175 2 years ago
I didn't know Saxton wrote Star Wars? Did he just do the new movies?
slicktyler 2 years ago
And the fact the imperials can't even steer those clunkers, nor can they detect a freighter stuck on the rear of a fellow ship.
SW tech is mostly the "I got a small penis" sorta style.
TheCastellan 2 years ago
I guess you missed the whole they were on the blind spot, part
blacksun2175 2 years ago
Their maneuverability is low but their straightline acceleration is huge, about twice that of an Impulse engine, their sensors have a minimum range and blind spots close to the hull, but they have a huge maximum range.
Also the advantages they have make such things as low relative maneuverability and minimum range sensors, meaningless trivia.
also an ISD is about the same maneuverability (and larger) as a Jem'hadar Battleship from the episode "Valiant". a Galaxy Class ship isn't much better.
Perion 2 years ago
SW tech follows the rule of adding a boatload of zeros to the end of power values, resulting in ludicrous things like hyperspace speeds of millions of times the speed of light just to explain throwaway lines like "they must be halfway across the galaxy by now"
ST tech follows the rule of technobabble and last second out of the ass jury-rigged BS of the sort that would make even MacGyver blush
I'm kind of torn on which one is more retarded.
ancalites 2 years ago
It's actually rather probable that they couldn't have detected the Falcon. Consider; it hid itself in the blind spot of the destroyer's sensors, and also by choosing to hide itself so close to the reactor and engine quadrants of the larger ship which would be producing large amounts of stray EM interference, it could remain undetected by any other sister ships within Vader's squadron.
ImperatorDerGalaxis 2 years ago
Hm i like both O.o star trek a little more though but thats because of the quantity i mean there are like 7 starwars movies (including the animated one) and a couple of comics while startrek has like what 12 movies? + a couple of tv series and a couple of comics (dont read or watch the comics though :D)
TheOneOwner 2 years ago
yes, but look at the merchandising that star wars has in comparison with star trek, and also, each one of the star wars movies has been labeled one of the greatest movies of our time, wheras most of the star trek movies, although good, have sort of been put down as a good movie and then safely stored away on the back row of a rental stores sci-fi section, its all about quality, not quantity my friend
noobsbane283 2 years ago
While I prefer Star Trek over Star Wars, The Empire's technology completely outclasses the Federation.
YellowPainting 2 years ago 2
In a power vrs power match, SW beats ST, as the writers of the SW tech books made sure their numbers are higher. Their respective techs are completely different in design, and ST has several unique tech advantages:
FTL weapons - ST ships routinely use their weapons and transporters in warp, and I remember several TNG episodes where they specifically used FTL torpedoes. They can easily manuver in warp, and have sensors that work in warp. SW ships in Hyperspace fly blind in a straight line.
jacevicki 2 years ago
actually that's not necessarily true, in Hyperspace they can make course corrections according to "The Clone Wars" and they can use communications with other ships as well,
also FTL weapons are only useful up against other ships flying at FTL,
the writers of the SW tech books did not "make sure their numbers were higher than Star Trek" they simply worked to figure out what it would take to achieve the sorts of things that occur in the films and EU, Trek didn't even enter many of their minds.
Perion 2 years ago
They're movies dude... I think you need to spend more time in reality rather than escaping into your little fantasy world. Get a life and stop obsessing over things that dont matter. Seriously!
djxtasyjr 2 years ago
Fan of both but a bigger fan of SW. That being said, ST had the superior tech. The millenium falcon is the fastest ship the rebels have and it barely does light, no contest for a warp drive. The transporter matter conversion technology pawns anything tech wise that SW has. Without the force, SW would get beaten badly. As for SW shields being better, they can't even stop a single seat fighter from making a kamikaze run and taking out the entire bridge. Dyson Sphere>Death Star.
Fektthis 2 years ago
um, the shields were down by the way, Transporters can be blocked by all sorts of things, shields, funny ore, 20th century power lines, radioactive interference, inhibitors the size of a camera tripod, tractor beams etc.
"the 0.5 past lightspeed" statement means that his FTL drive is rated as a class 0.5, and as seen on screen, routinely makes trips that even Slipstream can only dream of.
the Dyson Sphere and Star Destroyers are made out of similar materials, Durasteel is a Neutronium alloy.
Perion 2 years ago
in case you didn't notice, the Super Star Destroyer Executor had it's shields knocked out by Admiral Akbar's Mon Cal fleet and as the shields collapsed two A-wings destroyed their port long range sensor dome.
the A-wing also careened
Fun Fact: A-wings are one of the few fighters that have Durasteel fuselages rather than Titanium.
so no, Star Trek does NOT have Superior tech in any way shape or form.
Perion 2 years ago