Not really a "beautiful" ship, in my opinion. But it sure is big! It really looks top heavy, although I'm sure it's well engineered. It must have one a heck of a ballast tank in the hull. I'm still not sure I'd like to be on a top deck during heavy swells!
@1294wor, I don't think modern cruise ships carry ballast for stability. It's the same as driving a car with a bag of cement in the trunk all the time. The ships are designed so that the center of gravity is low enough without additional weight. Also, if there was ballast and the center of gravity would be too low, the rolling in waves would be more violent and, well, then it would be really uncomfortable in the upper decks. Therefore the ships is made stable enough, but not over-stable.
OK, sorry, 2fast...I imagine what happens to you depends on which side of the prop you fall. If you fall on the "back" side of the prop, physically hitting the prop would hurt, but because you'd be hitting the "flat" part of the prop, you wouldn't be cut apart. The action of the prop/water would then push you away from the stern. If you fell on the "front" part of the propeller, the action of the prop would draw you in, and the leading edges would chop you into pieces. It'd be over quick!
Does anyone wish they would have one of those big launching events where they would slide the ship down the dock into the water where it would splash in like in the olden days. That would be awesome.
Your intuition is right that the heavy stuff is important.
The fuel and water tanks and the heavy engines/propulsion systems are in the lower part of the ship. Also the kitchens and dining areas are also always placed on the first couple of decks because they involve massive weight..The higher you go on a ship the less weight is allowed by design. If you think about it the cabins are like honeycomb and the materials used in them are not sold typically. They empty the top pools in rough seas.
@jadventur, they don't use space-age materials when building ships like this because they are too expensive. It's just normal steel, high-strength steel and sometimes aluminium.
@tupsumato Aluminium is used quite extensively in modern cruise ships today. It's used to make the ship less top heavy, by using aluminium instead of steel in the top superstructure of the ship. The only downsides are that aluminium is not as strong as steel, so the structures can't support as much weight and aluminium structures have a shorter lifespan then steel, so they need frequent repairs when the ship reaches an age of about 25 years.
@xphs, aluminium has some issues, so I think they are mostly using high-strength steel to make the superstructure lighter in large cruise ships. There are also other modern materials such as steel sandwich panels that can be used in some places.
@tupsumato. Well, I don't think, I know. :) That is, atleast on the Voyager, Freedom and Genesis class ships that were made in Finland, the top decks and structures were all built from aluminium, with some steel support ofcource, but mainly aluminium.
@xphs, then I stand corrected. I've missed all our excursions to Turku, so I have never seen any of those ships up close with my own eyes. Hopefully I'll get a chance to visit the Allure before she leaves :)
This has been flagged as spam show
I Love Celebrity Cruises -CHANDRIS !! ( Chandris - Celebrity ss Gallileo 1985 )
PREROV866 1 year ago
i was on that ship
mario2002ify 1 year ago
I spent 18 months in Bremerhaven.
ausbegosh 1 year ago
HUGE
fivepoints 1 year ago
That's freaking huge
ps2nolimits 1 year ago
Not really a "beautiful" ship, in my opinion. But it sure is big! It really looks top heavy, although I'm sure it's well engineered. It must have one a heck of a ballast tank in the hull. I'm still not sure I'd like to be on a top deck during heavy swells!
1294wor 1 year ago
@1294wor, I don't think modern cruise ships carry ballast for stability. It's the same as driving a car with a bag of cement in the trunk all the time. The ships are designed so that the center of gravity is low enough without additional weight. Also, if there was ballast and the center of gravity would be too low, the rolling in waves would be more violent and, well, then it would be really uncomfortable in the upper decks. Therefore the ships is made stable enough, but not over-stable.
tupsumato 1 year ago
what do you think will happen if you fall right into the spinning propeller
2fast4u510 2 years ago
You will win a free dinner for two at McDonalds.
beyondonethousand 1 year ago
@beyondonethousand haha very funny jackass!
2fast4u510 1 year ago
Nothing good, I'd imagine...
1294wor 1 year ago
@1294wor ok thank you thats all you had to say
2fast4u510 1 year ago
OK, sorry, 2fast...I imagine what happens to you depends on which side of the prop you fall. If you fall on the "back" side of the prop, physically hitting the prop would hurt, but because you'd be hitting the "flat" part of the prop, you wouldn't be cut apart. The action of the prop/water would then push you away from the stern. If you fell on the "front" part of the propeller, the action of the prop would draw you in, and the leading edges would chop you into pieces. It'd be over quick!
1294wor 1 year ago
Comment removed
1294wor 1 year ago
@2fast4u510 GAME OVER then :DDD
12558654 1 year ago
must be bigger from the Olympic Class Liners but still i prefer the old and classic style these ships had. far more beautiful than this one
LosAlimosSixx 2 years ago
small
ageofempires619 2 years ago
wer hats gebaut :) ICH
Papenburger88 2 years ago
to risky it might tip over cause these ships are much more top heavy
spikeymikey1123 2 years ago
Does anyone wish they would have one of those big launching events where they would slide the ship down the dock into the water where it would splash in like in the olden days. That would be awesome.
hop208 2 years ago 6
haha.. i wish!
TheSecretWindowSpott 2 years ago
I'm surprised that one cable or chain (I can't tell) isn't snapping.
hop208 2 years ago
Your intuition is right that the heavy stuff is important.
The fuel and water tanks and the heavy engines/propulsion systems are in the lower part of the ship. Also the kitchens and dining areas are also always placed on the first couple of decks because they involve massive weight..The higher you go on a ship the less weight is allowed by design. If you think about it the cabins are like honeycomb and the materials used in them are not sold typically. They empty the top pools in rough seas.
jadventur 2 years ago
Also this ship has a ballast tank that,acts a counter weight of the ship...to trim the stability ..
VXxXAzzAXxXV 2 years ago
@jadventur, they don't use space-age materials when building ships like this because they are too expensive. It's just normal steel, high-strength steel and sometimes aluminium.
tupsumato 2 years ago
@tupsumato Aluminium is used quite extensively in modern cruise ships today. It's used to make the ship less top heavy, by using aluminium instead of steel in the top superstructure of the ship. The only downsides are that aluminium is not as strong as steel, so the structures can't support as much weight and aluminium structures have a shorter lifespan then steel, so they need frequent repairs when the ship reaches an age of about 25 years.
xphs 1 year ago
@xphs, aluminium has some issues, so I think they are mostly using high-strength steel to make the superstructure lighter in large cruise ships. There are also other modern materials such as steel sandwich panels that can be used in some places.
tupsumato 1 year ago
@tupsumato. Well, I don't think, I know. :) That is, atleast on the Voyager, Freedom and Genesis class ships that were made in Finland, the top decks and structures were all built from aluminium, with some steel support ofcource, but mainly aluminium.
xphs 1 year ago
@xphs, then I stand corrected. I've missed all our excursions to Turku, so I have never seen any of those ships up close with my own eyes. Hopefully I'll get a chance to visit the Allure before she leaves :)
tupsumato 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
oh that's gay man the ships like titanic have better designs ans the launch better not in some boring way
mexiacn100boy 2 years ago
It looks so animated. Like a drawing. So huge!!!
ManWhoLovesTheMary 3 years ago
hello i was on the ship for solstice undocking you can see me at the back top floor to the right i lay the external floors eg: future teak
Kane92UK 3 years ago
You can also see photos from this on Google Earth; you must search for Meyerwerft - Papenburg.
johanstoppels 3 years ago
Englisches Datum = monat/Tag/Jahr,
um Irrtümer zu vermeiden kann man den monat mit Buchstaben schreiben.
Das Schiff find ich nicht schön, sieht irgendwie auf maximale Passagiere getrimmt aus.
Zottl1234 3 years ago
10-8-08 didn't happen yet. Is that 9-8-08? :)
Krystle2007 3 years ago
Sunday morning 10/08/2008 and not 09/08/2008.
johanstoppels 3 years ago
10-08-08 is August 10, 2008 not October 8, 2008.
FFiB64 3 years ago
Okay, Thanks. I get it now, it was August 10, 2008. I thought it was October 8, 2008.
Krystle2007 3 years ago
8-8-08 is aug 8th , 9-8-08 is sept 8th - 10-8-08 is oct 8th
flya11 3 years ago
einfach nur geil(=
gutschies 3 years ago
A wonderful ship
NicolaFank 3 years ago
Che nave Fantastica!!!
Lingoss79 3 years ago
infinity que paso por aca
mauroelbueno 3 years ago
impresionante ....hola desde sur de chile puerto montt chile es te barco es el celebrity que pasado por aca........
mauroelbueno 3 years ago