Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)
Link to this comment:
Share to:
Loading...
- Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
or sign in to load a different list.
Loading...Saving...
not a patch on the proper bee gees version, still a great song though
SpacehotelMusic 2 months ago
one of the best versions. . . so mellow . . . so pleasant .
jabellarjr1 4 months ago
oh man, such a great cover ...
Rsoul71 1 year ago
I heard that Robert Stigwood signed her to his label and he had prolific artists in his stable at the time so there You have it...she was put with the brothers...
opendtuning 1 year ago
where is the bee gees version????
ssjbroly374 2 years ago
no original bee gees in my channel.
copyright issues....
65Seasons 2 years ago
Ahm ... nice song .... better feature the song & the composer ... she's so lucky to get into the music industry ahmmmm...
malouunggoy 2 years ago
better bee gees!!
tumivida1 2 years ago
Very odd, I'm not sure why Samantha Sang would be singing a Bee Gee's song that they had wrote and put on their Mr. Natural album. Still pretty nice though. :3
Resanub 2 years ago
Perhaps, they being friends and fellow Australians....
that's what friends are for :)
in their early days the Beatles (Lennon-McCartney) wrote songs for their friends such as the Rolling Stones, the Badfinger, Mary Hopkin.... :)
65Seasons 2 years ago
@Resanub
The reason is because Samantha used to be a backup singer for the Bee Gees in Australia. They proposed to Samantha to make this album for her and switch things around, that's why the Bee Gees are the backup singers for her on this album. Truly a rare opportunity not too many others have enjoyed. Sounds great!
laraweb 2 years ago